Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (9): 1018-1026.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2022.0134
Special Issue: 青藏高原植物生态学:种群生态学
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
DONG Quan-Min1,2(), ZHAO Xin-Quan2,3, LIU Yu-Zhen1, FENG Bin1, YU Yang1, YANG Xiao-Xia1, ZHANG Chun-Ping1, CAO Quan1, LIU Wen-Ting1,*()
Received:
2022-04-11
Accepted:
2022-07-22
Online:
2022-09-20
Published:
2022-10-19
Contact:
DONG Quan-Min,ZHAO Xin-Quan,LIU Yu-Zhen,FENG Bin,YU Yang,YANG Xiao-Xia,ZHANG Chun-Ping,CAO Quan,LIU Wen-Ting
About author:
(qhdxlwt@163.com)Supported by:
DONG Quan-Min, ZHAO Xin-Quan, LIU Yu-Zhen, FENG Bin, YU Yang, YANG Xiao-Xia, ZHANG Chun-Ping, CAO Quan, LIU Wen-Ting. Effects of different herbivore assemblage on relationship between Kobresia humilis seed size and seed number in an alpine grassland[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(9): 1018-1026.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.17521/cjpe.2022.0134
Fig. 2 Plots diagram and area of grazing experiments. CK, no grazing; M1, M2 and M3 representing yak and Xizang sheep grazing ratios with 1:2, 1:4 and 1:6; S, single Xizang sheep grazing; Y, single yak grazing.
Fig. 4 Effects of herbivore grazing assemblage on the seed size (A) and seed number (B) of Kobresia humilis in an alpine grassland (mean ± SE). CK, no grazing; M1, M2 and M3 representing yak and Xizang sheep grazing ratios with 1:2, 1:4 and 1:6; S, single Xizang sheep grazing; Y, single yak grazing. Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference among different grazing treatments (p < 0.05).
Fig. 5 Coefficient variation of seed size (A) and seed number (B) of Kobresia humilis in alpine grassland. CK, no grazing; M1, M2 and M3 representing yak and Xizang sheep grazing ratios with 1:2, 1:4 and 1:6; S, single Xizang sheep grazing; Y, single yak grazing.
放牧处理 Grazing treatment | 种子性状 Seed trait | 生殖相关性状 Reproductive related trait | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
个体总质量 Total individual mass | 生殖枝质量占比 Proportion of reproductive branch mass | 单条生殖枝质量 Mass of single reproductive branch | 个体种子总质量 Total individual seed mass | ||
牦牛单独放牧 Single yak grazing (Y) | 种子大小 Seed size | 0.275 | 0.318 | 0.298 | 0.408* |
藏羊单独放牧 Single Xizang sheep grazing (S) | 0.076 | 0.039 | 0.172 | 0.241 | |
牦牛藏羊1:2混牧 Yak:Xizang sheep grazing ratio of 1:2 (M1) | 0.014 | 0.132 | 0.335 | 0.258 | |
牦牛藏羊1:4混牧 Yak:Xizang sheep grazing ratio of 1:4 (M2) | 0.181 | 0.112 | 0.535** | 0.391* | |
牦牛藏羊1:6混牧 Yak:Xizang sheep grazing ratio of 1:6 (M3) | 0.090 | 0.069 | 0.223 | 0.285 | |
不放牧 No grazing (CK) | 0.234 | 0.280 | -0.114 | 0.432* | |
Y | 种子数量 Seed number | 0.738** | 0.459* | 0.112 | 0.915** |
S | 0.299* | 0.746** | 0.273 | 0.937** | |
M1 | 0.553** | 0.495** | 0.352 | 0.929** | |
M2 | 0.706** | 0.532** | 0.062 | 0.869** | |
M3 | 0.779** | 0.386* | 0.245 | 0.910** | |
CK | 0.594** | 0.626** | -0.019 | 0.965** |
Table 1 Pearson correlation between seed size, seed number and reproductive related traits of Kobresia humilis
放牧处理 Grazing treatment | 种子性状 Seed trait | 生殖相关性状 Reproductive related trait | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
个体总质量 Total individual mass | 生殖枝质量占比 Proportion of reproductive branch mass | 单条生殖枝质量 Mass of single reproductive branch | 个体种子总质量 Total individual seed mass | ||
牦牛单独放牧 Single yak grazing (Y) | 种子大小 Seed size | 0.275 | 0.318 | 0.298 | 0.408* |
藏羊单独放牧 Single Xizang sheep grazing (S) | 0.076 | 0.039 | 0.172 | 0.241 | |
牦牛藏羊1:2混牧 Yak:Xizang sheep grazing ratio of 1:2 (M1) | 0.014 | 0.132 | 0.335 | 0.258 | |
牦牛藏羊1:4混牧 Yak:Xizang sheep grazing ratio of 1:4 (M2) | 0.181 | 0.112 | 0.535** | 0.391* | |
牦牛藏羊1:6混牧 Yak:Xizang sheep grazing ratio of 1:6 (M3) | 0.090 | 0.069 | 0.223 | 0.285 | |
不放牧 No grazing (CK) | 0.234 | 0.280 | -0.114 | 0.432* | |
Y | 种子数量 Seed number | 0.738** | 0.459* | 0.112 | 0.915** |
S | 0.299* | 0.746** | 0.273 | 0.937** | |
M1 | 0.553** | 0.495** | 0.352 | 0.929** | |
M2 | 0.706** | 0.532** | 0.062 | 0.869** | |
M3 | 0.779** | 0.386* | 0.245 | 0.910** | |
CK | 0.594** | 0.626** | -0.019 | 0.965** |
Fig. 6 Trade-off relationship between seed size and seed number of Kobresia humilis under different grazing treatments. CK, no grazing; M1, M2 and M3 representing yak and Xizang sheep grazing ratios with 1:2, 1:4 and 1:6; S, single Xizang sheep grazing; Y, single yak grazing.
Fig. 7 Variable importance in projection values (VIP) of seed size and seed number trade-off by reproductive related traits under different grazing treatments. CK, no grazing; M1, M2 and M3 representing yak and Xizang sheep grazing ratios with 1:2, 1:4 and 1:6; S, single Xizang sheep grazing; Y, single yak grazing. RMP, proportion of reproductive branch mass; SRM, mass of single reproductive branch; TM, total individual mass; TSM, total individual seed mass. The dotted line indicates VIP = 1.
[1] |
Coomes DA, Grubb PJ (2003). Colonization, tolerance, competition and seed-size variation within functional groups. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18, 283-291.
DOI URL |
[2] |
Díaz S, Lavorel S, McIntyre S, Falczuk V, Casanoves F, Milchunas DG, Skerpe C, Rusch G, Sternberg M, Noy-Meir I, Landsberg J, Zhang W, Clark H, Campbell BD (2007). Plant trait responses to grazing—A global synthesis. Global Change Biology, 13, 313-341.
DOI URL |
[3] | Gómez JM (2004). Bigger is not always better: conflicting selective pressures on seed size in Quercus ilex. Evolution, 58, 71-80. |
[4] |
Han DY, Zhang W, Yiliyasi N, Yang YF (2021). Recruitment limitation of plant population regeneration. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 45, 1-12.
DOI URL |
[韩大勇, 张维, 努尔买买提·依力亚斯, 杨允菲(2021). 植物种群更新的补充限制. 植物生态学报, 45, 1-12.] | |
[5] | Kisdi É, Geritz SAH (2003). Competition-colonization trade-off between perennial plants: exclusion of the rare species, hysteresis effects and the robustness of coexistence under replacement competition. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 5, 529-548. |
[6] |
Leishman MR, Murray BR (2001). The relationship between seed size and abundance in plant communities: model predictions and observed patterns. Oikos, 94, 151-161.
DOI URL |
[7] | Li JL, Li XL (2016). Research progress on environmental adaptability of Kobresia humilis in alpine meadow. Ecological Science, 35, 156-165. |
[李积兰, 李希来 (2016). 高寒草甸矮嵩草的环境适应性研究进展. 生态科学, 35, 156-165.] | |
[8] | Liu WT, Dong QM (2021). The Ecology of Seeds. Science and Technology Literature Press, Beijing. |
[刘文亭, 董全民 (2021). 种子生态学. 科学技术文献出版社, 北京.] | |
[9] |
Liu WT, Sun SX, Zhang CP, Lv SJ, Dong QM (2020). Linking plant spatial aggregation with reproductive traits and near- source seed dispersal: ecological adaptation to heavy grazing. Journal of Plant Ecology, 13, 489-498.
DOI URL |
[10] |
Liu WT, Wang TL, Zhang S, Ding LJ, Wei ZJ (2018). Grazing influences Stipa breviflora seed germination in desert grasslands of the Inner Mongolia Plateau. PeerJ, 6, e4447. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4447.
DOI |
[11] | Liu WT, Wei ZJ, Lü SJ, Sun SX, Dai JZ, Yan BL (2015). Above-ground biomass in Stipa breviflora desert grassland at different organizational scales. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 21, 912-918. |
[刘文亭, 卫智军, 吕世杰, 孙世贤, 代景忠, 闫宝龙 (2015). 短花针茅荒漠草原不同组织尺度地上生物量. 应用与环境生物学报, 21, 912-918.] | |
[12] |
Liu YZ, Sun CC, Liu WT, Yang XX, Feng B, Shi G, Zhang X, Li CD, Yang ZZ, Gao J, Zhang XF, Yu Y, Zhang CP, Dong QM (2022). Response of keystone species changes in alpin grassland plant communities to different herbivore assemblage grazing. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 18. DOI: 10.5846/stxb2021110072757.
DOI |
[刘玉祯, 孙彩彩, 刘文亭, 杨晓霞, 冯斌, 时光, 张雪, 李彩弟, 杨增增, 高婕, 张小芳, 俞旸, 张春平, 董全民 (2022). 高寒草地植物群落关键种对不同放牧家畜组合放牧的响应. 生态学报, 18. DOI: 10.5846/stxb2021110072757.]
DOI |
|
[13] |
Lönnberg K, Eriksson O (2013). Rules of the seed size game: contests between large-seeded and small-seeded species. Oikos, 122, 1080-1084.
DOI URL |
[14] |
Lu N, Fu BJ, Jin TT, Chang RY (2014). Trade-off analyses of multiple ecosystem services by plantations along a precipitation gradient across Loess Plateau landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 29, 1697-1708.
DOI URL |
[15] |
MacKay J, Nikiforuk K, Szojka M, Little CJ, Fleri JR, Germain RM (2021). Animals connect plant species and resources in a meta-ecosystem. Landscape Ecology, 36, 1621-1629.
DOI URL |
[16] |
Maron JL, Pearson DE, Potter T, Ortega Y (2012). Seed size and provenance mediate the joint impacts of disturbance and seed predation on community assembly. Journal of Ecology, 100, 1492-1500.
DOI URL |
[17] |
Muller-Landau HC (2003). Seeds of understanding of plant diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 1469-1471.
PMID |
[18] |
Muller-Landau HC (2010). The tolerance-fecundity tradeoff and the maintenance of diversity in seed size. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 4242-4247.
DOI PMID |
[19] |
Orr D, Bui A, Klope M, McCullough IM, Lee M, Motta C, Mayorga S, Konicek K, Young HS (2022). Context- dependent effects of shifting large herbivore assemblages on plant structure and diversity. Journal of Ecology, 110, 1312-1327.
DOI URL |
[20] |
Rees M, Westoby M (1997). Game-theoretical evolution of seed mass in multi-species ecological models. Oikos, 78, 116-126.
DOI URL |
[21] | Rosenthal JP, Kotanen PM (1994). Terrestrial plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 94, 145-148. |
[22] |
Shroff R, Vergara F, Muck A, Svatos A, Gershenzon J (2008). Nonuniform distribution of glucosinolates in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves has important consequences for plant defense. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 6196-6201.
DOI PMID |
[23] | Sun DC, Li YL, Zhao XY, Luo YY, Bi JD (2016). Effects of grazing and enclosure on net ecosystem carbon exchange in the Horqin sandy grassland. Journal of Desert Research, 36, 93-102. |
[孙殿超, 李玉霖, 赵学勇, 罗亚勇, 毕京东 (2016). 围封和放牧对科尔沁沙质草地净生态系统碳交换量的影响. 中国沙漠, 36, 93-102.] | |
[24] |
Wu GL, Shang ZH, Zhu YJ, Ding LM, Wang D (2015). Species- abundance-seed-size patterns within a plant community affected by grazing disturbance. Ecological Applications, 25, 848-855.
DOI URL |
[25] |
Xie LN, Chen WZ, Gabler CA, Han L, Guo HY, Chen Q, Ma CC, Gu S (2016). Effects of grazing intensity on seed production of Caragana stenophylla along a climatic aridity gradient in the Inner Mongolia steppe, China. Journal of Arid Land, 8, 890-898.
DOI URL |
[26] |
Yang XX, Dong QM, Chu H, Ding CX, Yu Y, Zhang CP, Zhang YF, Yang ZZ (2019). Different responses of soil element contents and their stoichiometry (C:N:P) to yak grazing and Tibetan sheep grazing in an alpine grassland on the eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 285, 106628. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2019.106628.
DOI |
[27] |
Zhang H, Zhang Z (2008). Endocarp thickness affects seed removal speed by small rodents in a warm temperate broad-leafed deciduous forest, China. Acta Oecologica, 34, 285-293.
DOI URL |
[28] | Zhang YF, Yang XX, Dong QM, Zhang CP, Yu Y, Yang ZZ, Feng B, Chu H, Wei LN, Zhang XF (2019). Effects of mixed grazing of yak and Tibetan sheep on feed intake of grazing livestock and plant compensation growth. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 27, 1607-1614. |
[张艳芬, 杨晓霞, 董全民, 张春平, 俞旸, 杨增增, 冯斌, 褚晖, 魏琳娜, 张小芳 (2019). 牦牛和藏羊混合放牧对放牧家畜采食量和植物补偿性生长的影响. 草地学报, 27, 1607-1614.] | |
[29] |
Zhang YJ, Zhu JT, Shen RN, Wang L (2020). Research progress on the effects of grazing on grassland ecosystem. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 44, 553-564.
DOI URL |
[张扬建, 朱军涛, 沈若楠, 王荔 (2020). 放牧对草地生态系统影响的研究进展. 植物生态学报, 44, 553-564.]
DOI |
|
[30] |
Zunzunegui M, Ain-Lhout F, Jáuregui J, Barradas MD, Boutaleb S, Álvarez-Cansino L, Esquivias MP (2010). Fruit production under different environmental and management conditions of argan, Argania spinosa (L.). Journal of Arid Environments, 74, 1138-1145.
DOI URL |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn