Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2013, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (11): 1018-1027.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00105
Previous Articles Next Articles
CI Dun-Wei,DAI Liang-Xiang,SONG Wen-Wu,ZHANG Zhi-Meng()
Received:
2013-05-24
Accepted:
2013-10-08
Online:
2013-05-24
Published:
2013-11-06
Contact:
ZHANG Zhi-Meng
CI Dun-Wei,DAI Liang-Xiang,SONG Wen-Wu,ZHANG Zhi-Meng. Genotypic differences in salt tolerance from germination to seedling stage in peanut[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2013, 37(11): 1018-1027.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00105
编号 No. | 名称 Name | 编号 No. | 名称 Name | 编号 No. | 名称 Name | 编号 No. | 名称 Name |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ‘远杂9847’ ‘Yuanza 9847’ | 28 | ‘HR2’ | 55 | ‘D3095’ | 82 | ‘粤油186’ ‘Yueyou 186’ |
2 | ‘花101’ ‘Hua 101’ | 29 | ‘阜花13’ ‘Fuhua 13’ | 56 | ‘粤油85’ ‘Yueyou 85’ | 83 | ‘KB066’ |
3 | ‘豫花15’ ‘Yuhua 15’ | 30 | ‘花育32’ ‘Huayu 32’ | 57 | ‘粤油200’ ‘Yueyou 200’ | 84 | ‘551’ |
4 | ‘丰花6号’ ‘Fenghua 6’ | 31 | ‘Z7’ | 58 | ‘HR5’ | 85 | ‘C005’ |
5 | ‘H3’ | 32 | ‘X3’ | 59 | ‘41156’ | 86 | ‘KB077’ |
6 | ‘G2’ | 33 | ‘F’ | 60 | ‘徐花1号’ ‘Xuhua 1’ | 87 | ‘543’ |
7 | ‘花育34’ ‘Huayu 34’ | 34 | ‘HLN2’ | 61 | ‘湘花11’ ‘Xianghua 11’ | 88 | ‘A021’ |
8 | ‘Z8’ | 35 | ‘白沙1016’ ‘Baisha 1016’ | 62 | ‘HLL3’ | 89 | ‘粤油79’ ‘Yueyou 79’ |
9 | ‘Z6’ | 36 | ‘HLY5’ | 63 | ‘香香’ ‘Xiangxiang’ | 90 | ‘粤油29’ ‘Yueyou 29’ |
10 | ‘阜花10’ ‘Fuhua 10’ | 37 | ‘1018’ | 64 | ‘556’ | 91 | ‘905’ |
11 | ‘HR3’ | 38 | ‘红花生’ ‘Red peanut’ | 65 | ‘XE019’ | 92 | ‘558’ |
12 | ‘HZ10’ | 39 | ‘四粒红’ ‘Silihong’ | 66 | ‘565’ | 93 | ‘豫花9号’ ‘Yuhua 9’ |
13 | ‘Z10’ | 40 | ‘D1035’ | 67 | ‘D1090’ | 94 | ‘冀花4’ ‘Jihua 4’ |
14 | ‘花育24’ ‘Huayu 24’ | 41 | ‘561’ | 68 | ‘湘花13’ ‘Xianghua 13’ | 95 | ‘HLL9’ |
15 | ‘花育19’ ‘Huayu 19’ | 42 | ‘HR4’ | 69 | ‘D1006’ | 96 | ‘HLL20’ |
16 | ‘花育28’ ‘Huayu 28’ | 43 | ‘E172’ | 70 | ‘HLL10’ | 97 | ‘花选9号’ ‘Huaxuan 9’ |
17 | ‘HLN1’ | 44 | ‘花育22’ ‘Huayu 22’ | 71 | ‘D2026’ | 98 | ‘HZ13’ |
18 | ‘HZ14’ | 45 | ‘远育802’ ‘’Yuanyu 802 | 72 | ‘E091’ | 99 | ‘豫花16’ ‘Yuhua 16’ |
19 | ‘潍花6’ ‘Weihua 6’ | 46 | ‘冀油4’ ‘Jiyou 4’ | 73 | ‘E011’ | 100 | ‘汕油27’ ‘Shanyou 27’ |
20 | ‘Z11’ | 47 | ‘D1096’ | 74 | ‘555’ | 101 | ‘莲花3’ ‘Lihua 3’ |
21 | ‘HLY2’ | 48 | ‘淮花6’ ‘Huaihua 6’ | 75 | ‘阜花11’ ‘Fuhua 11’ | 102 | ‘KB001’ |
22 | ‘16-8’ | 49 | ‘海花2’ ‘Haihua 2’ | 76 | ‘557’ | 103 | ‘冀花98-1’ ‘Jihua 98-1’ |
23 | ‘花育25’ ‘Huayu 25’ | 50 | ‘粤油26’ ‘Yueyou 26’ | 77 | ‘HLL2’ | 104 | ‘547’ |
24 | ‘唐科8号’ ‘Tangke 8’ | 51 | ‘粤油101’ ‘Yueyou 101’ | 78 | ‘KB113’ | 105 | ‘09-5’ |
25 | ‘花育39’ ‘Huayu 39’ | 52 | ‘中花57’ ‘Zhonghua 57’ | 79 | ‘粤油7’ ‘Yueyou 7’ | 106 | ‘HLL11’ |
26 | ‘白花生’ ‘White peanut’ | 53 | ‘HLL17’ | 80 | ‘R20’ | 107 | ‘鲁花10’ ‘Luhua 10’ |
27 | ‘H1’ | 54 | ‘R6’ | 81 | ‘D2025’ |
Table 1 Peanut varieties (lines) in the experiment
编号 No. | 名称 Name | 编号 No. | 名称 Name | 编号 No. | 名称 Name | 编号 No. | 名称 Name |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ‘远杂9847’ ‘Yuanza 9847’ | 28 | ‘HR2’ | 55 | ‘D3095’ | 82 | ‘粤油186’ ‘Yueyou 186’ |
2 | ‘花101’ ‘Hua 101’ | 29 | ‘阜花13’ ‘Fuhua 13’ | 56 | ‘粤油85’ ‘Yueyou 85’ | 83 | ‘KB066’ |
3 | ‘豫花15’ ‘Yuhua 15’ | 30 | ‘花育32’ ‘Huayu 32’ | 57 | ‘粤油200’ ‘Yueyou 200’ | 84 | ‘551’ |
4 | ‘丰花6号’ ‘Fenghua 6’ | 31 | ‘Z7’ | 58 | ‘HR5’ | 85 | ‘C005’ |
5 | ‘H3’ | 32 | ‘X3’ | 59 | ‘41156’ | 86 | ‘KB077’ |
6 | ‘G2’ | 33 | ‘F’ | 60 | ‘徐花1号’ ‘Xuhua 1’ | 87 | ‘543’ |
7 | ‘花育34’ ‘Huayu 34’ | 34 | ‘HLN2’ | 61 | ‘湘花11’ ‘Xianghua 11’ | 88 | ‘A021’ |
8 | ‘Z8’ | 35 | ‘白沙1016’ ‘Baisha 1016’ | 62 | ‘HLL3’ | 89 | ‘粤油79’ ‘Yueyou 79’ |
9 | ‘Z6’ | 36 | ‘HLY5’ | 63 | ‘香香’ ‘Xiangxiang’ | 90 | ‘粤油29’ ‘Yueyou 29’ |
10 | ‘阜花10’ ‘Fuhua 10’ | 37 | ‘1018’ | 64 | ‘556’ | 91 | ‘905’ |
11 | ‘HR3’ | 38 | ‘红花生’ ‘Red peanut’ | 65 | ‘XE019’ | 92 | ‘558’ |
12 | ‘HZ10’ | 39 | ‘四粒红’ ‘Silihong’ | 66 | ‘565’ | 93 | ‘豫花9号’ ‘Yuhua 9’ |
13 | ‘Z10’ | 40 | ‘D1035’ | 67 | ‘D1090’ | 94 | ‘冀花4’ ‘Jihua 4’ |
14 | ‘花育24’ ‘Huayu 24’ | 41 | ‘561’ | 68 | ‘湘花13’ ‘Xianghua 13’ | 95 | ‘HLL9’ |
15 | ‘花育19’ ‘Huayu 19’ | 42 | ‘HR4’ | 69 | ‘D1006’ | 96 | ‘HLL20’ |
16 | ‘花育28’ ‘Huayu 28’ | 43 | ‘E172’ | 70 | ‘HLL10’ | 97 | ‘花选9号’ ‘Huaxuan 9’ |
17 | ‘HLN1’ | 44 | ‘花育22’ ‘Huayu 22’ | 71 | ‘D2026’ | 98 | ‘HZ13’ |
18 | ‘HZ14’ | 45 | ‘远育802’ ‘’Yuanyu 802 | 72 | ‘E091’ | 99 | ‘豫花16’ ‘Yuhua 16’ |
19 | ‘潍花6’ ‘Weihua 6’ | 46 | ‘冀油4’ ‘Jiyou 4’ | 73 | ‘E011’ | 100 | ‘汕油27’ ‘Shanyou 27’ |
20 | ‘Z11’ | 47 | ‘D1096’ | 74 | ‘555’ | 101 | ‘莲花3’ ‘Lihua 3’ |
21 | ‘HLY2’ | 48 | ‘淮花6’ ‘Huaihua 6’ | 75 | ‘阜花11’ ‘Fuhua 11’ | 102 | ‘KB001’ |
22 | ‘16-8’ | 49 | ‘海花2’ ‘Haihua 2’ | 76 | ‘557’ | 103 | ‘冀花98-1’ ‘Jihua 98-1’ |
23 | ‘花育25’ ‘Huayu 25’ | 50 | ‘粤油26’ ‘Yueyou 26’ | 77 | ‘HLL2’ | 104 | ‘547’ |
24 | ‘唐科8号’ ‘Tangke 8’ | 51 | ‘粤油101’ ‘Yueyou 101’ | 78 | ‘KB113’ | 105 | ‘09-5’ |
25 | ‘花育39’ ‘Huayu 39’ | 52 | ‘中花57’ ‘Zhonghua 57’ | 79 | ‘粤油7’ ‘Yueyou 7’ | 106 | ‘HLL11’ |
26 | ‘白花生’ ‘White peanut’ | 53 | ‘HLL17’ | 80 | ‘R20’ | 107 | ‘鲁花10’ ‘Luhua 10’ |
27 | ‘H1’ | 54 | ‘R6’ | 81 | ‘D2025’ |
NaCl浓度 NaCl concentration | 指标 Index | 变异幅度 Range | 平均值 Mean | 标准偏差 SD | 中值 Median | 众数 Mode | 偏度 Skewness | 峰度 Kurtosis | 变异系数 CV (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.15% | RET | 0.492-0.962 | 0.791 | 0.098 | 0.793 | 0.667 | -0.295 | -0.253 | 12.33 |
RPH | 0.401-0.992 | 0.759 | 0.112 | 0.776 | 0.776 | -0.552 | 0.509 | 14.79 | |
RSH | 0.258-0.977 | 0.677 | 0.149 | 0.701 | 0.714 | -0.364 | -0.121 | 21.99 | |
RRL | 0.430-0.990 | 0.817 | 0.126 | 0.860 | 0.900 | -1.078 | 0.577 | 15.37 | |
RSFM | 0.367-0.995 | 0.829 | 0.128 | 0.850 | 0.900 | -1.235 | 1.587 | 15.39 | |
RRFM | 0.325-0.989 | 0.797 | 0.153 | 0.850 | 0.900 | -1.123 | 0.635 | 19.22 | |
RPFM | 0.374-0.986 | 0.825 | 0.129 | 0.856 | 0.900 | -1.252 | 1.349 | 15.62 | |
RSDM | 0.101-0.993 | 0.719 | 0.222 | 0.774 | 0.900 | -0.896 | -0.096 | 30.85 | |
RRDM | 0.359-0.990 | 0.767 | 0.166 | 0.805 | 0.900 | -0.740 | -0.328 | 21.64 | |
RPDM | 0.144-0.960 | 0.727 | 0.193 | 0.774 | 0.900 | -0.864 | -0.002 | 26.60 | |
0.30% | RET | 0.333-0.793 | 0.555 | 0.098 | 0.545 | 0.667 | 0.045 | -0.740 | 45.66 |
RPH | 0.080-0.758 | 0.422 | 0.128 | 0.413 | 0.345 | 0.449 | 0.604 | 30.33 | |
RSH | 0.057-0.743 | 0.333 | 0.121 | 0.310 | 0.256 | 0.935 | 1.611 | 36.24 | |
RRL | 0.179-0.995 | 0.682 | 0.182 | 0.707 | 0.500 | -0.643 | 0.167 | 36.24 | |
RSFM | 0.183-0.993 | 0.467 | 0.166 | 0.446 | 0.504 | 0.948 | 1.092 | 26.62 | |
RRFM | 0.043-0.862 | 0.356 | 0.177 | 0.325 | 0.093 | 0.599 | 0.271 | 35.59 | |
RPFM | 0.165-0.963 | 0.442 | 0.159 | 0.416 | 0.259 | 0.844 | 0.912 | 49.64 | |
RSDM | 0.081-1.114 | 0.392 | 0.214 | 0.347 | 0.320 | 0.936 | 0.638 | 36.01 | |
RRDM | 0.048-0.961 | 0.406 | 0.207 | 0.390 | 0.254 | 0.618 | 0.056 | 54.58 | |
RPDM | 0.106-0.995 | 0.403 | 0.184 | 0.363 | 0.395 | 0.972 | 0.823 | 51.06 | |
0.45% | RET | 0.300-0.719 | 0.448 | 0.096 | 0.444 | 0.35 | 0.791 | 0.206 | 21.46 |
RPH | 0.037-0.671 | 0.320 | 0.131 | 0.305 | 0.156 | 0.230 | -0.375 | 40.86 | |
RSH | 0.033-0.623 | 0.244 | 0.119 | 0.212 | 0.184 | 0.587 | -0.102 | 48.87 | |
RRL | 0.164-0.931 | 0.592 | 0.199 | 0.600 | 0.600 | -0.140 | -0.887 | 33.60 | |
RSFM | 0.098-0.691 | 0.287 | 0.127 | 0.269 | 0.144 | 0.963 | 0.576 | 44.45 | |
RRFM | 0.016-0.566 | 0.172 | 0.108 | 0.149 | 0.106 | 1.268 | 1.947 | 62.86 | |
RPFM | 0.085-0.605 | 0.259 | 0.114 | 0.245 | 0.178 | 0.910 | 0.597 | 44.03 | |
RSDM | 0.021-0.783 | 0.191 | 0.127 | 0.168 | 0.068 | 1.575 | 3.949 | 66.71 | |
RRDM | 0.017-0.599 | 0.206 | 0.113 | 0.192 | 0.079 | 1.048 | 1.440 | 54.63 | |
RPDM | 0.005-0.916 | 0.199 | 0.156 | 0.162 | 0.064 | 2.538 | 8.515 | 78.48 |
Table 2 Descriptive statistical analysis of salt-tolerance indices for the varieties (lines) under different salt stresses
NaCl浓度 NaCl concentration | 指标 Index | 变异幅度 Range | 平均值 Mean | 标准偏差 SD | 中值 Median | 众数 Mode | 偏度 Skewness | 峰度 Kurtosis | 变异系数 CV (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.15% | RET | 0.492-0.962 | 0.791 | 0.098 | 0.793 | 0.667 | -0.295 | -0.253 | 12.33 |
RPH | 0.401-0.992 | 0.759 | 0.112 | 0.776 | 0.776 | -0.552 | 0.509 | 14.79 | |
RSH | 0.258-0.977 | 0.677 | 0.149 | 0.701 | 0.714 | -0.364 | -0.121 | 21.99 | |
RRL | 0.430-0.990 | 0.817 | 0.126 | 0.860 | 0.900 | -1.078 | 0.577 | 15.37 | |
RSFM | 0.367-0.995 | 0.829 | 0.128 | 0.850 | 0.900 | -1.235 | 1.587 | 15.39 | |
RRFM | 0.325-0.989 | 0.797 | 0.153 | 0.850 | 0.900 | -1.123 | 0.635 | 19.22 | |
RPFM | 0.374-0.986 | 0.825 | 0.129 | 0.856 | 0.900 | -1.252 | 1.349 | 15.62 | |
RSDM | 0.101-0.993 | 0.719 | 0.222 | 0.774 | 0.900 | -0.896 | -0.096 | 30.85 | |
RRDM | 0.359-0.990 | 0.767 | 0.166 | 0.805 | 0.900 | -0.740 | -0.328 | 21.64 | |
RPDM | 0.144-0.960 | 0.727 | 0.193 | 0.774 | 0.900 | -0.864 | -0.002 | 26.60 | |
0.30% | RET | 0.333-0.793 | 0.555 | 0.098 | 0.545 | 0.667 | 0.045 | -0.740 | 45.66 |
RPH | 0.080-0.758 | 0.422 | 0.128 | 0.413 | 0.345 | 0.449 | 0.604 | 30.33 | |
RSH | 0.057-0.743 | 0.333 | 0.121 | 0.310 | 0.256 | 0.935 | 1.611 | 36.24 | |
RRL | 0.179-0.995 | 0.682 | 0.182 | 0.707 | 0.500 | -0.643 | 0.167 | 36.24 | |
RSFM | 0.183-0.993 | 0.467 | 0.166 | 0.446 | 0.504 | 0.948 | 1.092 | 26.62 | |
RRFM | 0.043-0.862 | 0.356 | 0.177 | 0.325 | 0.093 | 0.599 | 0.271 | 35.59 | |
RPFM | 0.165-0.963 | 0.442 | 0.159 | 0.416 | 0.259 | 0.844 | 0.912 | 49.64 | |
RSDM | 0.081-1.114 | 0.392 | 0.214 | 0.347 | 0.320 | 0.936 | 0.638 | 36.01 | |
RRDM | 0.048-0.961 | 0.406 | 0.207 | 0.390 | 0.254 | 0.618 | 0.056 | 54.58 | |
RPDM | 0.106-0.995 | 0.403 | 0.184 | 0.363 | 0.395 | 0.972 | 0.823 | 51.06 | |
0.45% | RET | 0.300-0.719 | 0.448 | 0.096 | 0.444 | 0.35 | 0.791 | 0.206 | 21.46 |
RPH | 0.037-0.671 | 0.320 | 0.131 | 0.305 | 0.156 | 0.230 | -0.375 | 40.86 | |
RSH | 0.033-0.623 | 0.244 | 0.119 | 0.212 | 0.184 | 0.587 | -0.102 | 48.87 | |
RRL | 0.164-0.931 | 0.592 | 0.199 | 0.600 | 0.600 | -0.140 | -0.887 | 33.60 | |
RSFM | 0.098-0.691 | 0.287 | 0.127 | 0.269 | 0.144 | 0.963 | 0.576 | 44.45 | |
RRFM | 0.016-0.566 | 0.172 | 0.108 | 0.149 | 0.106 | 1.268 | 1.947 | 62.86 | |
RPFM | 0.085-0.605 | 0.259 | 0.114 | 0.245 | 0.178 | 0.910 | 0.597 | 44.03 | |
RSDM | 0.021-0.783 | 0.191 | 0.127 | 0.168 | 0.068 | 1.575 | 3.949 | 66.71 | |
RRDM | 0.017-0.599 | 0.206 | 0.113 | 0.192 | 0.079 | 1.048 | 1.440 | 54.63 | |
RPDM | 0.005-0.916 | 0.199 | 0.156 | 0.162 | 0.064 | 2.538 | 8.515 | 78.48 |
NaCl浓度 NaCl concentration | 指标 Index | RET | RPH | RSH | RRL | RSFW | RRFW | RPFW | RSDW | RRDW | RPDW |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.15% | RET | 1 | |||||||||
RPH | 0.278** | 1 | |||||||||
RSH | 0.246* | 0.934** | 1 | ||||||||
RRL | 0.364** | 0.290** | 0.269** | 1 | |||||||
RSFM | 0.312** | 0.580** | 0.575** | 0.220* | 1 | ||||||
RRFM | 0.284** | 0.344** | 0.329** | 0.356** | 0.593** | 1 | |||||
RPFM | 0.364** | 0.530** | 0.524** | 0.293** | 0.947** | 0.776** | 1 | ||||
RSDM | 0.154 | 0.028 | 0.020 | 0.014 | 0.127 | 0.084 | 0.14 | 1 | |||
RRDM | 0.295** | 0.356** | 0.336** | 0.319** | 0.467** | 0.749** | 0.608** | 0.098 | 1 | ||
RPDM | 0.155 | 0.069 | 0.039 | 0.084 | 0.188 | 0.174 | 0.218* | 0.927** | 0.253* | 1 | |
RET | 1 | ||||||||||
0.30% | RPH | 0.281** | 1 | ||||||||
RSH | 0.231* | 0.920** | 1 | ||||||||
RRL | 0.106 | 0.112 | 0.071 | 1 | |||||||
RSFM | 0.141 | 0.624** | 0.657** | 0.304** | 1 | ||||||
RRFM | 0.266** | 0.540** | 0.479** | 0.206* | 0.648** | 1 | |||||
RPFM | 0.207* | 0.649** | 0.654** | 0.258** | 0.945** | 0.817** | 1 | ||||
RSDM | -0.076 | -0.024 | -0.123 | -0.173 | -0.092 | -0.207* | -0.126 | 1 | |||
RRDM | 0.368** | 0.497** | 0.426** | 0.225* | 0.542** | 0.829** | 0.689** | -0.151 | 1 | ||
RPDM | -0.050 | 0.007 | -0.086 | -0.132 | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.049 | 0.848** | 0.101 | 1 | |
0.45% | RET | 1 | |||||||||
RPH | 0.286** | 1 | |||||||||
RSH | 0.210* | 0.841** | 1 | ||||||||
RRL | 0.133 | 0.360** | 0.233* | 1 | |||||||
RSFM | -0.104 | 0.352** | 0.277** | 0.142 | 1 | ||||||
RRFM | 0.085 | 0.444** | 0.391** | 0.269** | 0.609** | 1 | |||||
RPFM | -0.044 | 0.402** | 0.320** | 0.199* | 0.981** | 0.726** | 1 | ||||
RSDM | -0.037 | 0.094 | 0.049 | -0.001 | 0.129 | 0.155 | 0.152 | 1 | |||
RRDM | 0.236* | 0.415** | 0.364** | 0.312** | 0.417** | 0.763** | 0.529** | 0.136 | 1 | ||
RPDM | 0.063 | 0.199* | 0.074 | 0.023 | 0.172 | 0.408** | 0.245* | 0.711** | 0.370** | 1 |
Table 3 Correlation analysis of salt-tolerance indices for the varieties (lines) under different salt stresses
NaCl浓度 NaCl concentration | 指标 Index | RET | RPH | RSH | RRL | RSFW | RRFW | RPFW | RSDW | RRDW | RPDW |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.15% | RET | 1 | |||||||||
RPH | 0.278** | 1 | |||||||||
RSH | 0.246* | 0.934** | 1 | ||||||||
RRL | 0.364** | 0.290** | 0.269** | 1 | |||||||
RSFM | 0.312** | 0.580** | 0.575** | 0.220* | 1 | ||||||
RRFM | 0.284** | 0.344** | 0.329** | 0.356** | 0.593** | 1 | |||||
RPFM | 0.364** | 0.530** | 0.524** | 0.293** | 0.947** | 0.776** | 1 | ||||
RSDM | 0.154 | 0.028 | 0.020 | 0.014 | 0.127 | 0.084 | 0.14 | 1 | |||
RRDM | 0.295** | 0.356** | 0.336** | 0.319** | 0.467** | 0.749** | 0.608** | 0.098 | 1 | ||
RPDM | 0.155 | 0.069 | 0.039 | 0.084 | 0.188 | 0.174 | 0.218* | 0.927** | 0.253* | 1 | |
RET | 1 | ||||||||||
0.30% | RPH | 0.281** | 1 | ||||||||
RSH | 0.231* | 0.920** | 1 | ||||||||
RRL | 0.106 | 0.112 | 0.071 | 1 | |||||||
RSFM | 0.141 | 0.624** | 0.657** | 0.304** | 1 | ||||||
RRFM | 0.266** | 0.540** | 0.479** | 0.206* | 0.648** | 1 | |||||
RPFM | 0.207* | 0.649** | 0.654** | 0.258** | 0.945** | 0.817** | 1 | ||||
RSDM | -0.076 | -0.024 | -0.123 | -0.173 | -0.092 | -0.207* | -0.126 | 1 | |||
RRDM | 0.368** | 0.497** | 0.426** | 0.225* | 0.542** | 0.829** | 0.689** | -0.151 | 1 | ||
RPDM | -0.050 | 0.007 | -0.086 | -0.132 | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.049 | 0.848** | 0.101 | 1 | |
0.45% | RET | 1 | |||||||||
RPH | 0.286** | 1 | |||||||||
RSH | 0.210* | 0.841** | 1 | ||||||||
RRL | 0.133 | 0.360** | 0.233* | 1 | |||||||
RSFM | -0.104 | 0.352** | 0.277** | 0.142 | 1 | ||||||
RRFM | 0.085 | 0.444** | 0.391** | 0.269** | 0.609** | 1 | |||||
RPFM | -0.044 | 0.402** | 0.320** | 0.199* | 0.981** | 0.726** | 1 | ||||
RSDM | -0.037 | 0.094 | 0.049 | -0.001 | 0.129 | 0.155 | 0.152 | 1 | |||
RRDM | 0.236* | 0.415** | 0.364** | 0.312** | 0.417** | 0.763** | 0.529** | 0.136 | 1 | ||
RPDM | 0.063 | 0.199* | 0.074 | 0.023 | 0.172 | 0.408** | 0.245* | 0.711** | 0.370** | 1 |
0.15% | 0.30% | 0.45% | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | |||
RET | 0.172 | 0.161 | 0.140 | 0.741 | 0.183 | 0.368 | -0.046 | -0.259 | 0.640 | 0.085 | ||
RPH | 0.211 | 0.924 | 0.005 | 0.183 | 0.916 | 0.126 | 0.006 | 0.305 | 0.826 | 0.069 | ||
RSH | 0.201 | 0.934 | -0.013 | 0.149 | 0.941 | 0.049 | -0.101 | 0.254 | 0.783 | -0.018 | ||
RRL | 0.184 | 0.108 | -0.039 | 0.828 | -0.143 | 0.703 | -0.163 | 0.172 | 0.507 | -0.062 | ||
RSFM | 0.707 | 0.545 | 0.105 | 0.020 | 0.715 | 0.492 | 0.012 | 0.940 | 0.036 | 0.017 | ||
RRFM | 0.901 | 0.085 | 0.028 | 0.210 | 0.553 | 0.687 | -0.010 | 0.757 | 0.353 | 0.257 | ||
RPFM | 0.842 | 0.418 | 0.106 | 0.109 | 0.730 | 0.585 | 0.037 | 0.958 | 0.124 | 0.081 | ||
RSDM | 0.028 | 0.016 | 0.982 | 0.035 | -0.049 | -0.183 | 0.937 | 0.059 | -0.049 | 0.896 | ||
RRDM | 0.798 | 0.074 | 0.087 | 0.252 | 0.458 | 0.725 | 0.071 | 0.549 | 0.475 | 0.276 | ||
RPDM | 0.150 | 0.003 | 0.966 | 0.069 | -0.005 | 0.034 | 0.971 | 0.176 | 0.080 | 0.918 | ||
特征值 Eigenvalue | 2.830 | 2.250 | 1.950 | 1.420 | 3.340 | 2.260 | 1.870 | 2.960 | 2.340 | 1.810 | ||
贡献率 Contribution (%) | 28.27 | 22.50 | 19.50 | 14.17 | 33.40 | 22.64 | 18.67 | 29.65 | 23.37 | 18.10 | ||
累计贡献率 Cumulative contribution (%) | 28.27 | 50.77 | 70.27 | 84.44 | 33.40 | 56.04 | 74.72 | 29.65 | 53.02 | 71.12 |
Table 4 Eigenvalues, contribution, and loading matrix of components of salt-tolerance indices for the varieties (lines) under different salt stresses
0.15% | 0.30% | 0.45% | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | |||
RET | 0.172 | 0.161 | 0.140 | 0.741 | 0.183 | 0.368 | -0.046 | -0.259 | 0.640 | 0.085 | ||
RPH | 0.211 | 0.924 | 0.005 | 0.183 | 0.916 | 0.126 | 0.006 | 0.305 | 0.826 | 0.069 | ||
RSH | 0.201 | 0.934 | -0.013 | 0.149 | 0.941 | 0.049 | -0.101 | 0.254 | 0.783 | -0.018 | ||
RRL | 0.184 | 0.108 | -0.039 | 0.828 | -0.143 | 0.703 | -0.163 | 0.172 | 0.507 | -0.062 | ||
RSFM | 0.707 | 0.545 | 0.105 | 0.020 | 0.715 | 0.492 | 0.012 | 0.940 | 0.036 | 0.017 | ||
RRFM | 0.901 | 0.085 | 0.028 | 0.210 | 0.553 | 0.687 | -0.010 | 0.757 | 0.353 | 0.257 | ||
RPFM | 0.842 | 0.418 | 0.106 | 0.109 | 0.730 | 0.585 | 0.037 | 0.958 | 0.124 | 0.081 | ||
RSDM | 0.028 | 0.016 | 0.982 | 0.035 | -0.049 | -0.183 | 0.937 | 0.059 | -0.049 | 0.896 | ||
RRDM | 0.798 | 0.074 | 0.087 | 0.252 | 0.458 | 0.725 | 0.071 | 0.549 | 0.475 | 0.276 | ||
RPDM | 0.150 | 0.003 | 0.966 | 0.069 | -0.005 | 0.034 | 0.971 | 0.176 | 0.080 | 0.918 | ||
特征值 Eigenvalue | 2.830 | 2.250 | 1.950 | 1.420 | 3.340 | 2.260 | 1.870 | 2.960 | 2.340 | 1.810 | ||
贡献率 Contribution (%) | 28.27 | 22.50 | 19.50 | 14.17 | 33.40 | 22.64 | 18.67 | 29.65 | 23.37 | 18.10 | ||
累计贡献率 Cumulative contribution (%) | 28.27 | 50.77 | 70.27 | 84.44 | 33.40 | 56.04 | 74.72 | 29.65 | 53.02 | 71.12 |
0.15% | 0.30% | 0.45% | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | |||
RET | -0.113 | -0.027 | 0.034 | 0.598 | -0.037 | 0.189 | -0.005 | -0.234 | 0.372 | 0.062 | ||
RPH | -0.160 | 0.501 | 0.002 | 0.009 | 0.381 | -0.219 | -0.007 | -0.025 | 0.368 | -0.020 | ||
RSH | -0.159 | 0.513 | -0.005 | -0.019 | 0.420 | -0.287 | -0.071 | -0.028 | 0.357 | -0.065 | ||
RRL | -0.096 | -0.079 | -0.068 | 0.686 | -0.298 | 0.521 | -0.041 | -0.011 | 0.231 | -0.073 | ||
RSFM | 0.235 | 0.160 | 0.011 | -0.198 | 0.165 | 0.100 | 0.023 | 0.393 | -0.149 | -0.102 | ||
RRFM | 0.426 | -0.202 | -0.067 | -0.012 | 0.026 | 0.287 | 0.027 | 0.230 | 0.039 | 0.054 | ||
RPFM | 0.323 | 0.035 | -0.007 | -0.132 | 0.141 | 0.161 | 0.042 | 0.377 | -0.109 | -0.068 | ||
RSDM | -0.079 | 0.025 | 0.522 | -0.017 | 0.019 | -0.050 | 0.497 | -0.072 | -0.063 | 0.532 | ||
RRDM | 0.358 | -0.185 | -0.029 | 0.046 | -0.032 | 0.350 | 0.075 | 0.117 | 0.138 | 0.086 | ||
RPDM | -0.014 | -0.019 | 0.501 | -0.010 | -0.033 | 0.086 | 0.528 | -0.047 | -0.018 | 0.527 | ||
总得分公式 Total scoring formula | F = 0.334F1 + 0.266F2 + 0.230F3 + 0.170F4 | F = 0.447F1 + 0.303F2 + 0.250F3 | F = 0.417F1 + 0.329F2 + 0.254F3 |
Table 5 System matrix of component scoring and the scoring formula of components in salt-tolerant indices for the varieties (lines) under different salt stresses
0.15% | 0.30% | 0.45% | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | |||
RET | -0.113 | -0.027 | 0.034 | 0.598 | -0.037 | 0.189 | -0.005 | -0.234 | 0.372 | 0.062 | ||
RPH | -0.160 | 0.501 | 0.002 | 0.009 | 0.381 | -0.219 | -0.007 | -0.025 | 0.368 | -0.020 | ||
RSH | -0.159 | 0.513 | -0.005 | -0.019 | 0.420 | -0.287 | -0.071 | -0.028 | 0.357 | -0.065 | ||
RRL | -0.096 | -0.079 | -0.068 | 0.686 | -0.298 | 0.521 | -0.041 | -0.011 | 0.231 | -0.073 | ||
RSFM | 0.235 | 0.160 | 0.011 | -0.198 | 0.165 | 0.100 | 0.023 | 0.393 | -0.149 | -0.102 | ||
RRFM | 0.426 | -0.202 | -0.067 | -0.012 | 0.026 | 0.287 | 0.027 | 0.230 | 0.039 | 0.054 | ||
RPFM | 0.323 | 0.035 | -0.007 | -0.132 | 0.141 | 0.161 | 0.042 | 0.377 | -0.109 | -0.068 | ||
RSDM | -0.079 | 0.025 | 0.522 | -0.017 | 0.019 | -0.050 | 0.497 | -0.072 | -0.063 | 0.532 | ||
RRDM | 0.358 | -0.185 | -0.029 | 0.046 | -0.032 | 0.350 | 0.075 | 0.117 | 0.138 | 0.086 | ||
RPDM | -0.014 | -0.019 | 0.501 | -0.010 | -0.033 | 0.086 | 0.528 | -0.047 | -0.018 | 0.527 | ||
总得分公式 Total scoring formula | F = 0.334F1 + 0.266F2 + 0.230F3 + 0.170F4 | F = 0.447F1 + 0.303F2 + 0.250F3 | F = 0.417F1 + 0.329F2 + 0.254F3 |
Fig. 2 Numbers of varieties (lines) in different salt tolerance types under different salt stresses. HS, highly salt susceptible type; HT, highly salt tolerant type; S, salt susceptible type; T, salt tolerant type.
NaCl浓度 NaCl concentration | 类型 Type | RET | RPH | RSH | RRL | RSFW | RRFW | RPFW | RSDW | RRDW | RPDW |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.15% | HT | 0.819a | 0.816a | 0.751a | 0.855a | 0.911a | 0.892a | 0.916a | 0.792a | 0.877a | 0.805a |
T | 0.780a | 0.732b | 0.640b | 0.795a | 0.811b | 0.793b | 0.808b | 0.675a | 0.737b | 0.686b | |
S | 0.766a | 0.682bc | 0.613b | 0.841a | 0.694c | 0.584c | 0.668c | 0.539b | 0.583c | 0.564c | |
HS | 0.703b | 0.633c | 0.485c | 0.672b | 0.550d | 0.450d | 0.513d | 0.687a | 0.440d | 0.631bc | |
F | 4.27** | 12.78** | 13.37** | 6.49** | 61.76** | 83.91** | 132.15** | 4.60** | 51.65** | 6.78** | |
0.30% | HT | 0.566a | 0.651a | 0.552a | 0.720a | 0.790a | 0.568a | 0.739a | 0.426a | 0.627a | 0.480a |
T | 0.582a | 0.452b | 0.360b | 0.691a | 0.492b | 0.434b | 0.483b | 0.377a | 0.487b | 0.406ab | |
S | 0.535ab | 0.367c | 0.272c | 0.671a | 0.373c | 0.219c | 0.331c | 0.441a | 0.286c | 0.394ab | |
HS | 0.504b | 0.271d | 0.207d | 0.651a | 0.321c | 0.194c | 0.292c | 0.350a | 0.210c | 0.360b | |
F | 3.85* | 81.82** | 70.09** | 0.45 | 69.79** | 43.97** | 85.69** | 0.88 | 26.76** | 1.17 | |
0.45% | HT | 0.426a | 0.426a | 0.357a | 0.740a | 0.552a | 0.425a | 0.518a | 0.255a | 0.404a | 0.294a |
T | 0.475a | 0.426a | 0.310a | 0.618b | 0.383b | 0.242b | 0.348b | 0.246ab | 0.271b | 0.312a | |
S | 0.439a | 0.298b | 0.234b | 0.602b | 0.259c | 0.150c | 0.233c | 0.175bc | 0.197c | 0.165b | |
HS | 0.448a | 0.216c | 0.156c | 0.487c | 0.155d | 0.060d | 0.134d | 0.144c | 0.087d | 0.118b | |
F | 0.94 | 17.55** | 11.04** | 3.67* | 65.03** | 78.89** | 102.87** | 3.61* | 35.33** | 10.11** |
Table 6 Index difference of different salt tolerant varieties (lines) under different salt stresses
NaCl浓度 NaCl concentration | 类型 Type | RET | RPH | RSH | RRL | RSFW | RRFW | RPFW | RSDW | RRDW | RPDW |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.15% | HT | 0.819a | 0.816a | 0.751a | 0.855a | 0.911a | 0.892a | 0.916a | 0.792a | 0.877a | 0.805a |
T | 0.780a | 0.732b | 0.640b | 0.795a | 0.811b | 0.793b | 0.808b | 0.675a | 0.737b | 0.686b | |
S | 0.766a | 0.682bc | 0.613b | 0.841a | 0.694c | 0.584c | 0.668c | 0.539b | 0.583c | 0.564c | |
HS | 0.703b | 0.633c | 0.485c | 0.672b | 0.550d | 0.450d | 0.513d | 0.687a | 0.440d | 0.631bc | |
F | 4.27** | 12.78** | 13.37** | 6.49** | 61.76** | 83.91** | 132.15** | 4.60** | 51.65** | 6.78** | |
0.30% | HT | 0.566a | 0.651a | 0.552a | 0.720a | 0.790a | 0.568a | 0.739a | 0.426a | 0.627a | 0.480a |
T | 0.582a | 0.452b | 0.360b | 0.691a | 0.492b | 0.434b | 0.483b | 0.377a | 0.487b | 0.406ab | |
S | 0.535ab | 0.367c | 0.272c | 0.671a | 0.373c | 0.219c | 0.331c | 0.441a | 0.286c | 0.394ab | |
HS | 0.504b | 0.271d | 0.207d | 0.651a | 0.321c | 0.194c | 0.292c | 0.350a | 0.210c | 0.360b | |
F | 3.85* | 81.82** | 70.09** | 0.45 | 69.79** | 43.97** | 85.69** | 0.88 | 26.76** | 1.17 | |
0.45% | HT | 0.426a | 0.426a | 0.357a | 0.740a | 0.552a | 0.425a | 0.518a | 0.255a | 0.404a | 0.294a |
T | 0.475a | 0.426a | 0.310a | 0.618b | 0.383b | 0.242b | 0.348b | 0.246ab | 0.271b | 0.312a | |
S | 0.439a | 0.298b | 0.234b | 0.602b | 0.259c | 0.150c | 0.233c | 0.175bc | 0.197c | 0.165b | |
HS | 0.448a | 0.216c | 0.156c | 0.487c | 0.155d | 0.060d | 0.134d | 0.144c | 0.087d | 0.118b | |
F | 0.94 | 17.55** | 11.04** | 3.67* | 65.03** | 78.89** | 102.87** | 3.61* | 35.33** | 10.11** |
[1] | Abrol IP, Yadav JSP, Massoud FI (1988). Salt-affected soils and their management. http://www.fao.org/docrep/x5871e/x5871e00.htm. Cited: May 2013. |
[2] | Dong ZG, Cheng ZH (2009). Salt tolerance and assessment of salt tolerance indices of tomato varieties in sprout stage and seedling stage. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 29, 1348-1355. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 董志刚, 程智慧 (2009). 番茄品种资源芽苗期和幼苗期的耐盐性及耐盐指标评价. 生态学报, 29, 1348-1355.] | |
[3] | Eynard A, Lal R, Wiebe K (2005). Crop response in salt-affected soils. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 27, 5-50. |
[4] | Gu XY, Zheng SL, Yan XL, Yang C, Lu YG (1998). Influence of salinity levels on variability of salt tolerance indices in rice seedlings. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 19, 30-34. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 顾兴友, 郑少玲, 严小龙, 杨崇, 卢永根 (1998). 盐浓度对水稻苗期耐盐指标变异度的影响. 华南农业大学学报, 19, 30-34.] | |
[5] | Guo F, Wan SB, Li XG, Xu PL, Meng JJ (2010). Effects of NaCl stress on seed germination of peanut. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 28(3), 177-181. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 郭峰, 万书波, 李新国, 徐平丽, 孟静静 (2010). NaCl胁迫对花生种子萌发的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 28(3), 177-181.] | |
[6] |
Katerji N, van Hoorn JW, Hamdy A, Mastrorilli M (2000). Salt tolerance classification of crops according to soil salinity and to water stress day index. Agricultural Water Management, 43, 99-109.
DOI URL |
[7] | Liu YH, Shen Y, Chen ZD, Wang ZF, Yan W (2012). Identification of salt tolerance in peanut varieties/lines at the germination stage. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 34, 168-173, 180. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 刘永惠, 沈一, 陈志德, 王州飞, 颜伟 (2012). 不同花生品种(系)萌发期耐盐性的鉴定与评价. 中国油料作物学报, 34, 168-173, 180.] | |
[8] | Liu ZP, Shen QR, Yin JL (1998). Coastal Saline Soil Agriculture. China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[ 刘兆普, 沈其荣, 尹金来 (1998). 滨海盐土农业. 中国农业科学技术出版社, 北京.] | |
[9] | Shen Y, Liu YH, Chen ZD, Yan W, Luan YZ (2012). Selection and evaluation of peanut varieties based on seedling salt tolerance. Journal of Peanut Science, 41(1), 10-15. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 沈一, 刘永惠, 陈志德, 颜伟, 栾玉柱 (2012). 花生幼苗期耐盐品种的筛选与评价. 花生学报, 41(1), 10-15.] | |
[10] | Wan SB (2009). Opportunities facing peanut industry in China and strategies for its science and technology development. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 11(1), 7-12. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 万书波 (2009). 我国花生产业面临的机遇与科技发展战略. 中国农业科技导报, 11(1), 7-12.] | |
[11] | Wang JJ, Wang DL, Fan WL, Song GF, Wang S, Ye WW (2011). The characters of salt-tolerance at different growth stages in cotton. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31, 3720-3727. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 王俊娟, 王德龙, 樊伟莉, 宋贵方, 王帅, 叶武威 (2011). 陆地棉萌发至三叶期不同生育阶段耐盐特性. 生态学报, 31, 3720-3727.] | |
[12] | Wang XZ, Wang CT, Tang YY, Wu Q, Jiang SG, Qi YC (2011). Screening of mutagenized peanut material and lines for salt tolerance at germination stage. Journal of Peanut Science, 40(4), 13-18. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 王秀贞, 王传堂, 唐月异, 吴琪, 姜守刚, 戚永春 (2011). 花生诱变材料及品系芽期耐盐性鉴定. 花生学报, 40(4), 13-18.] | |
[13] | Wang ZQ, Zhu SQ, Yu RP, Li LQ, Shan GZ, You WR, Zeng XX, Zhang CW, Zhang LJ, Song RH (1993). Chinese Salt-Affected Soils. Science Press, Beijing. 1-4. (in Chinese) |
[ 王遵亲, 祝寿泉, 俞仁培, 黎立群, 单光宗, 尤文瑞, 曾宪修, 张粹雯, 张丽君, 宋荣华 (1993). 中国盐渍土. 科学出版社, 北京. 1-4.] | |
[14] | Wu LR, Chen J, Xu TT, Miao HR, Hu WG, Yu SL (2005). Identification of salt tolerance in peanut growth duration. Journal of Peanut Science, 34(1), 20-24. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 吴兰荣, 陈静, 许婷婷, 苗华荣, 胡文广, 禹山林 (2005). 花生全生育期耐盐鉴定研究. 花生学报, 34(1), 20-24.] | |
[15] | Wu LR, Gu SY (1996). Identification of salt tolerance of peanut germplasm resources. Journal of Peanut Science, 25(3), 24-26. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 吴兰荣, 顾淑媛 (1996). 花生种质资源耐盐性筛选鉴定初报. 花生学报, 25(3), 24-26.] | |
[16] | Xie CT (1993). Saline Soil Improvement Principle and Crop Resistance. China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[ 谢承陶 (1993). 盐渍土改良原理与作物抗性. 中国农业科学技术出版社, 北京.] | |
[17] | Yang SH, Ji J, Wang G, Song YJ (2006). Effects of salt stress on plants. Molecular Plant Breeding, 4(3(S)), 139-142. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 杨少辉, 季静, 王罡, 宋英今 (2006). 盐胁迫对植物影响的研究进展. 分子植物育种, 4(3(S)), 139-142.] | |
[18] | Zhang HB, Cui JZ, Cao TT, Zhang JT, Liu QQ, Liu YH (2011). Response to salt stresses and assessment of salt tolerability of soybean varieties in emergence and seedling stages. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31, 2805-2812. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 张海波, 崔继哲, 曹甜甜, 张佳彤, 刘千千, 刘摇欢 (2011). 大豆出苗期和苗期对盐胁迫的响应及耐盐指标评价. 生态学报, 31, 2805-2812.] | |
[19] |
Zhang K, Tian CY, Li CJ (2009). Review of progress of studies on salt-tolerance mechanisms of annual halophytes. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 33, 1220-1231.
DOI URL |
[ 张科, 田长彦, 李春俭 (2009). 一年生盐生植物耐盐机制研究进展. 植物生态学报, 33, 1220-1231.]
DOI URL |
[1] | ZHOU Kai-Ling, ZHAO Yu-Jin, BAI Yong-Fei. Study on forest plant diversity monitoring based on Sentinel-2A satellite data in northeast China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(10): 1251-1267. |
[2] | LIU Juan,DENG Xu,LÜ Li-Xin. Relationship of tree growth and climatic factors at treeline of Picea likiangensis var. balfouriana forest in Basu County, Xizang [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2015, 39(5): 442-452. |
[3] | HU Chu-Qi,LIU Jin-Ke,WANG Tian-Hong,WANG Wen-Lin,LU Shan,ZHOU Chang-Fang. Influence of three types of salt stress on photosynthesis in Spartina alterniflora and Phragmites australis [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2015, 39(1): 92-103. |
[4] | ZHANG Jia-Lei,LI Xiang-Dong,YANG Chuan-Ting,GAO Fang,ZHANG Feng,WANG Yuan-Yuan,SUN Lian-Qiang. Relationship of quality formation and ultrastructure of cotyledon cells in two quality types of peanut [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2013, 37(8): 768-776. |
[5] | ZHANG Zhi-Meng, WAN Shu-Bo, DAI Liang-Xiang, SONG Wen-Wu, CHEN Jing, SHI Yun-Qing. Estimating and screening of drought resistance indexes of peanut [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2011, 35(1): 100-109. |
[6] | YANG Hao, BAI Yong-Fei, LI Yong-Hong, HAN Xing-Guo. RESPONSE OF PLANT SPECIES COMPOSITION AND COMMUNITY STRUCTURE TO LONGTERM GRAZING IN TYPICAL STEPPE OF INNER MONGOLIA [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2009, 33(3): 499-507. |
[7] | ZHU Yu-Jie, GAO Qiong, LIU Jun-Shan, XU Xia, ZHOU Chan. AGGREGATION OF PLANT FUNCTIONAL TYPES BASED ON MODELS OF STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2007, 31(5): 873-882. |
[8] | LIN Jin-Cheng, QIANG Sheng. INFLUENCE OF ALTERNANTHERA PHILOXEROIDES ON THE SPECIES COMPOSITION AND DIVERSITY OF WEED COMMUNITY IN SPRING IN NANJING [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2006, 30(4): 585-592. |
[9] | LI Hua-Shou, ZHANG Xiu-Yu, ZENG Xiang-You, NIE Cheng-Rong. TOXIC EFFECTS OF POTASSIUM CHLORATE ON PEANUT GROWTH [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2006, 30(1): 124-131. |
[10] | Qiang Sheng, Li Yang-han. On the Distribution Pattern of Weed Communities of Summer Crop Fields in River valley and Hilly Lands of Anhui Province [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 1990, 14(3): 212-219. |
[11] | Duan Lian. Preliminary Study on Weed Types of Farm Land in Fengqiu County, Henan Province [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 1988, 12(4): 292-299. |
[12] | Wang Bo-sun, Yu Shi-xiao, Zhang Hung-da, Hu Yu-jia, Lu Yang, Paul P. H. But, Zhong Yan-xing. Cluster Analysis and Ordination of Forest Communities on Hong Kong Island [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 1988, 12(1): 1-11. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn