Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2014, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (9): 990-1000.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00093
Previous Articles Next Articles
GUO Shu-Jin1,LI Wei-Yu2,MA Yan-Yun1,ZHAO Heng1,QIAO Ling1,LI Gui-Quan1,*()
Received:
2014-01-28
Accepted:
2014-07-02
Online:
2014-01-28
Published:
2014-09-22
Contact:
LI Gui-Quan
GUO Shu-Jin,LI Wei-Yu,MA Yan-Yun,ZHAO Heng,QIAO Ling,LI Gui-Quan. Comprehensive evaluation of low-temperature tolerance in soybean cultivars of different eco-types at seedling stage in Shanxi Province[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2014, 38(9): 990-1000.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00093
品种 Cultivar | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 叶形 Leaf shape | 花色 Flower color | 茸毛色 Fluff color | 种皮色 Seed coat color | 脐色 Hilum color | 生育期时长 Breeding period duration (d) | 结荚习性 Growth habit | 品种类型 Cultivar type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘晋大53’ ‘Jinda 53’ | 95-105 | 椭圆 Ellipse | 白色 White | 棕色 Brown | 黄色 Yellow | 褐脐 Brown | 125-135 | 无限 Indeterminate | 高产、晚熟 High yield and late maturity |
‘晋大70’ ‘Jinda 70’ | 75-90 | 椭圆 Ellipse | 白色 White | 棕色 Brown | 黄色 Yellow | 淡白 Light white | 115-128 | 有限 Determinate | 稳产、中熟 Stable yield and medium maturity |
‘晋豆24’ ‘Jindou 24’ | 80-95 | 尖叶 Sharp | 紫色 Purple | 棕色 Brown | 黄色 Yellow | 淡脐 Light | 95-110 | 亚有限 Semi- determinate | 中产、早熟 Medium yield and early maturity |
Table 1 Biological traits of the soybean cultivars tested
品种 Cultivar | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 叶形 Leaf shape | 花色 Flower color | 茸毛色 Fluff color | 种皮色 Seed coat color | 脐色 Hilum color | 生育期时长 Breeding period duration (d) | 结荚习性 Growth habit | 品种类型 Cultivar type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘晋大53’ ‘Jinda 53’ | 95-105 | 椭圆 Ellipse | 白色 White | 棕色 Brown | 黄色 Yellow | 褐脐 Brown | 125-135 | 无限 Indeterminate | 高产、晚熟 High yield and late maturity |
‘晋大70’ ‘Jinda 70’ | 75-90 | 椭圆 Ellipse | 白色 White | 棕色 Brown | 黄色 Yellow | 淡白 Light white | 115-128 | 有限 Determinate | 稳产、中熟 Stable yield and medium maturity |
‘晋豆24’ ‘Jindou 24’ | 80-95 | 尖叶 Sharp | 紫色 Purple | 棕色 Brown | 黄色 Yellow | 淡脐 Light | 95-110 | 亚有限 Semi- determinate | 中产、早熟 Medium yield and early maturity |
Fig. 1 Extension of seedling stage of different cultivars following low temperature stress treatments (mean ± SE). Different capital letters indicate significant differences at the level of 0.01.
品种 Cultivar | 温度处理 Treatment (℃) | 开花数 Flower number | 成荚率 Pod-bearing rate | 一粒荚数 1-seed pod number | 二粒荚数 2-seed pod number | 三粒荚数 3-seed pod number | 四粒荚数 4-seed pod number |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘晋大53’ ‘Jinda 53’ | 14 | 28.33 ± 2.517C | 37.67% ± 0.051C | 6.00 ± 2.000B | 3.67 ± 1.528C | 1.00 ± 1.000C | 0C |
17 | 46.00 ± 4.583B | 44.00% ± 0.040BC | 9.33 ± 2.309A | 6.33 ± 0.577C | 3.33 ± 0.577C | 1.33 ± 0.577B | |
20 | 52.00 ± 5.568B | 53.33% ± 0.067B | 4.33 ± 0.577B | 11.67 ± 1.155B | 10.00 ± 2.00B | 1.33 ± 0.577B | |
23 | 63.00 ± 4.359A | 71.33% ± 0.083A | 3.33 ± 0.577B | 17.00 ± 2.646A | 21.33 ± 1.528A | 3.00 ± 0.00A | |
‘晋大70’ ‘Jinda 70’ | 14 | 43.00 ± 2.646D | 44.33% ± 0.032C | 8.67 ± 0.577A | 9.67 ± 0.577C | 0.67 ± 0.577D | 0B |
17 | 58.33 ± 5.132C | 56.33% ± 0.025B | 5.67 ± 0.577B | 15.67 ± 1.154A | 11.00 ± 1.00C | 0.67 ± 0.577AB | |
20 | 67.67 ± 4.509B | 64.00% ± 0.032B | 2.00 ± 0.000C | 11.67 ± 2.081BC | 31.33 ± 1.53B | 1.33 ± 0.577A | |
23 | 77.00 ± 3.606A | 83.00% ± 0.078A | 1.00 ± 0.000D | 13.67 ± 3.055AB | 49.00 ± 1.00A | 1A | |
‘晋豆24’ ‘Jindou 24’ | 14 | 24.33 ± 2.517C | 47.67% ± 0.015B | 4.33 ± 0.577A | 6.67 ± 0.577B | 0.67 ± 0.577C | 0B |
17 | 39.00 ± 0.000B | 54.67% ± 0.015B | 4.67 ± 0.577A | 11.00 ± 1.000A | 4.67 ± 0.577B | 1B | |
20 | 56.33 ± 6.807A | 68.67% ± 0.032A | 3.00 ± 1.000AB | 12.00 ± 1.732A | 17.33 ± 1.154A | 1.33 ± 0.577B | |
23 | 64.33 ± 6.506A | 69.00% ± 0.079A | 1.67 ± 1.154B | 6.00 ± 1.732B | 20.00 ± 3.464A | 17.00 ± 3.605A |
Table 2 Comparisons of growth traits of different cultivars subjected to different temperature treatments (mean ± SE, n = 3)
品种 Cultivar | 温度处理 Treatment (℃) | 开花数 Flower number | 成荚率 Pod-bearing rate | 一粒荚数 1-seed pod number | 二粒荚数 2-seed pod number | 三粒荚数 3-seed pod number | 四粒荚数 4-seed pod number |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘晋大53’ ‘Jinda 53’ | 14 | 28.33 ± 2.517C | 37.67% ± 0.051C | 6.00 ± 2.000B | 3.67 ± 1.528C | 1.00 ± 1.000C | 0C |
17 | 46.00 ± 4.583B | 44.00% ± 0.040BC | 9.33 ± 2.309A | 6.33 ± 0.577C | 3.33 ± 0.577C | 1.33 ± 0.577B | |
20 | 52.00 ± 5.568B | 53.33% ± 0.067B | 4.33 ± 0.577B | 11.67 ± 1.155B | 10.00 ± 2.00B | 1.33 ± 0.577B | |
23 | 63.00 ± 4.359A | 71.33% ± 0.083A | 3.33 ± 0.577B | 17.00 ± 2.646A | 21.33 ± 1.528A | 3.00 ± 0.00A | |
‘晋大70’ ‘Jinda 70’ | 14 | 43.00 ± 2.646D | 44.33% ± 0.032C | 8.67 ± 0.577A | 9.67 ± 0.577C | 0.67 ± 0.577D | 0B |
17 | 58.33 ± 5.132C | 56.33% ± 0.025B | 5.67 ± 0.577B | 15.67 ± 1.154A | 11.00 ± 1.00C | 0.67 ± 0.577AB | |
20 | 67.67 ± 4.509B | 64.00% ± 0.032B | 2.00 ± 0.000C | 11.67 ± 2.081BC | 31.33 ± 1.53B | 1.33 ± 0.577A | |
23 | 77.00 ± 3.606A | 83.00% ± 0.078A | 1.00 ± 0.000D | 13.67 ± 3.055AB | 49.00 ± 1.00A | 1A | |
‘晋豆24’ ‘Jindou 24’ | 14 | 24.33 ± 2.517C | 47.67% ± 0.015B | 4.33 ± 0.577A | 6.67 ± 0.577B | 0.67 ± 0.577C | 0B |
17 | 39.00 ± 0.000B | 54.67% ± 0.015B | 4.67 ± 0.577A | 11.00 ± 1.000A | 4.67 ± 0.577B | 1B | |
20 | 56.33 ± 6.807A | 68.67% ± 0.032A | 3.00 ± 1.000AB | 12.00 ± 1.732A | 17.33 ± 1.154A | 1.33 ± 0.577B | |
23 | 64.33 ± 6.506A | 69.00% ± 0.079A | 1.67 ± 1.154B | 6.00 ± 1.732B | 20.00 ± 3.464A | 17.00 ± 3.605A |
Fig. 2 Reduction rates in photosynthetic trait values in seed- lings of different cultivars subjected to low temperature treat- ments (mean ± SE). Ci, intercellular CO2 concentration; Gs, stomatal conductance; Pn, net photosynthetic rate; Tr, transpire- tion rate. Different capital letters and lower letters indicate sig- nificant differences at the levels of 0.01 and 0.05, respectively.
Fig. 3 Comparisons of reduction rates in photosynthetic trait values among cultivars subjected to low temperature treatments (mean ± SE). Ci, intercellular CO2 concentration; Gs, stomatal conductance; Pn, net photosynthetic rate; Tr, transpiration rate. Different capital letters and lowercase letters indicate signify- cant differences at the levels of 0.01 and 0.05, respectively.
Fig. 4 Reduction rates in yield trait values of different cultivars subjected to low temperature treatments (mean ± SE). Different capital letters and lowercase letters indicate significant differences at the levels of 0.01 and 0.05, respectively.
Fig. 5 Comparisons of reductions rates in yield trait values among cultivars subjected to low temperature treatments (mean ± SE). Different capital letters and lowercase letters indicate significant differences at the levels of 0.01 and 0.05, respectively.
品种 Cultivar | 14 ℃ | 17 ℃ | 20 ℃ | 23 ℃ |
---|---|---|---|---|
‘晋大53’ ‘Jinda 53’ | 92.09 ± 12.84B | 100.52 ± 20.90B | 215.33 ± 5.51A | 243.67 ± 21.73A |
‘晋大70’ ‘Jinda 70’ | 148.69 ± 37.31C | 196.24 ± 12.38BC | 214.68 ± 19.56AB | 251.67 ± 27.54A |
‘晋豆24’ ‘Jindou 24’ | 104.77 ± 17.61C | 103.67 ± 23.82C | 115.43 ± 13.33B | 233.00 ± 15.87A |
Table 3 Comparison of the final yields of different cultivars subjected to different temperature treatments (g, mean ± SE, n = 3)
品种 Cultivar | 14 ℃ | 17 ℃ | 20 ℃ | 23 ℃ |
---|---|---|---|---|
‘晋大53’ ‘Jinda 53’ | 92.09 ± 12.84B | 100.52 ± 20.90B | 215.33 ± 5.51A | 243.67 ± 21.73A |
‘晋大70’ ‘Jinda 70’ | 148.69 ± 37.31C | 196.24 ± 12.38BC | 214.68 ± 19.56AB | 251.67 ± 27.54A |
‘晋豆24’ ‘Jindou 24’ | 104.77 ± 17.61C | 103.67 ± 23.82C | 115.43 ± 13.33B | 233.00 ± 15.87A |
Fig. 6 Effects of photosynthetic traits on cultivars under low temperature stress at seedling stage. Ci, intercellular CO2 concentration; DR, decline rate; Gs, stomatal conductance; Pn, net photosynthetic rate; Tr, transpiration rate.
Fig. 7 Correlations among photosynthetic traits under low temperature stress at seedling stage. Ci, intercellular CO2 concentration; DR, decline rate; Gs, stomatal conductance; Pn, net photosynthetic rate; Tr, transpiration rate.
Fig. 8 Effects of yield traits on cultivars under low temperature stress at seedling stage. DR, decline rate; PH, plant hight; PPP, pods per plant; PM, plant mass; YPP, yield per plant.
Fig. 9 Correlations among yield traits under low temperature stress at seedling stage. DR, decline rate; PH, plant hight; PPP, pods per plant; PM, plant mass; YPP, yield per plant.
性状 Trait | 隶属函数值 Values of subordinate function | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14 ℃ | 17 ℃ | 20 ℃ | |||||||||
‘晋大53’ ‘Jinda 53’ | ‘晋大70’ ‘Jinda 70’ | ‘晋豆24’ ‘Jindou 24’ | ‘晋大53’ ‘Jinda 53’ | ‘晋大70’ ‘Jinda 70’ | ‘晋豆24’ ‘Jindou 24’ | ‘晋大53’ ‘Jinda 53’ | ‘晋大70’ ‘Jinda 70’ | ‘晋豆24’ ‘Jindou 24’ | |||
苗期延长率 Extension of seedling stage | 0.121 | 1.000 | 0 | 0.170 | 1.000 | 0 | 0.298 | 1.000 | 0 | ||
Pn下降率 Reduction rate of Pn | 1.000 | 0.498 | 0 | 1.000 | 0.941 | 0 | 0.278 | 1.000 | 0 | ||
Ci下降率 Reduction rate of Ci | 1.000 | 0 | 0.268 | 1.000 | 0.254 | 0 | 1.000 | 0.934 | 0 | ||
Gs下降率 Reduction rate of Gs | 1.000 | 0 | 0.437 | 1.000 | 0.309 | 0 | 0.430 | 0 | 1.000 | ||
Tr下降率 Reduction rate of Tr | 1.000 | 0 | 0.437 | 0.872 | 1.000 | 0 | 1.000 | 0 | 0.735 | ||
株高下降率 Reduction rate of plant height | 0 | 1.000 | 0.583 | 0.072 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 0.461 | 1.000 | ||
单株生物量下降率 Reduction rate of plant mass | 0 | 0.692 | 1.000 | 0 | 1.000 | 0.411 | 0 | 1.000 | 0.662 | ||
单株荚数下降率 Reduction rate of pods per plant | 0.200 | 1.000 | 0 | 0.270 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 | 0.366 | ||
单株产量下降率 Reduction rate of yield per plant | 0 | 1.000 | 0.317 | 0.270 | 1.000 | 0 | 1.000 | 0.922 | 0 | ||
$\bar{X}i$ | 0.48 | 0.58 | 0.34 | 0.52 | 0.83 | 0.05 | 0.45 | 0.70 | 0.42 | ||
耐低温性 Low-temperature tolerance | ‘晋大70’ > ‘晋大53’ > ‘晋豆24’ ‘Jinda 70’ > ‘Jinda 53’ > ‘Jindou 24’ | ‘晋大70’ > ‘晋大53’ > ‘晋豆24’ ‘Jinda 70’ > ‘Jinda 53’ > ‘Jindou 24’ | ‘晋大70’ > ‘晋大53’ > ‘晋豆24’ ‘Jinda 70’ > ‘Jinda 53’ > ‘Jindou 24’ |
Table 4 Comprehensive evaluation of low-temperature tolerance in different cultivars at seedling stage
性状 Trait | 隶属函数值 Values of subordinate function | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14 ℃ | 17 ℃ | 20 ℃ | |||||||||
‘晋大53’ ‘Jinda 53’ | ‘晋大70’ ‘Jinda 70’ | ‘晋豆24’ ‘Jindou 24’ | ‘晋大53’ ‘Jinda 53’ | ‘晋大70’ ‘Jinda 70’ | ‘晋豆24’ ‘Jindou 24’ | ‘晋大53’ ‘Jinda 53’ | ‘晋大70’ ‘Jinda 70’ | ‘晋豆24’ ‘Jindou 24’ | |||
苗期延长率 Extension of seedling stage | 0.121 | 1.000 | 0 | 0.170 | 1.000 | 0 | 0.298 | 1.000 | 0 | ||
Pn下降率 Reduction rate of Pn | 1.000 | 0.498 | 0 | 1.000 | 0.941 | 0 | 0.278 | 1.000 | 0 | ||
Ci下降率 Reduction rate of Ci | 1.000 | 0 | 0.268 | 1.000 | 0.254 | 0 | 1.000 | 0.934 | 0 | ||
Gs下降率 Reduction rate of Gs | 1.000 | 0 | 0.437 | 1.000 | 0.309 | 0 | 0.430 | 0 | 1.000 | ||
Tr下降率 Reduction rate of Tr | 1.000 | 0 | 0.437 | 0.872 | 1.000 | 0 | 1.000 | 0 | 0.735 | ||
株高下降率 Reduction rate of plant height | 0 | 1.000 | 0.583 | 0.072 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 0.461 | 1.000 | ||
单株生物量下降率 Reduction rate of plant mass | 0 | 0.692 | 1.000 | 0 | 1.000 | 0.411 | 0 | 1.000 | 0.662 | ||
单株荚数下降率 Reduction rate of pods per plant | 0.200 | 1.000 | 0 | 0.270 | 1.000 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 | 0.366 | ||
单株产量下降率 Reduction rate of yield per plant | 0 | 1.000 | 0.317 | 0.270 | 1.000 | 0 | 1.000 | 0.922 | 0 | ||
$\bar{X}i$ | 0.48 | 0.58 | 0.34 | 0.52 | 0.83 | 0.05 | 0.45 | 0.70 | 0.42 | ||
耐低温性 Low-temperature tolerance | ‘晋大70’ > ‘晋大53’ > ‘晋豆24’ ‘Jinda 70’ > ‘Jinda 53’ > ‘Jindou 24’ | ‘晋大70’ > ‘晋大53’ > ‘晋豆24’ ‘Jinda 70’ > ‘Jinda 53’ > ‘Jindou 24’ | ‘晋大70’ > ‘晋大53’ > ‘晋豆24’ ‘Jinda 70’ > ‘Jinda 53’ > ‘Jindou 24’ |
[1] | Bai SN (2005). Plant Developmental Biology. Beijing University Press, Beijing. 82-83. (in Chinese) |
[ 白书农 (2005). 植物发育生物学. 北京大学出版社, 北京. 82-83.] | |
[2] |
Bartholomew PW, Williams RD (2005). Cool-season grass development response to accumulated temperature under a range of temperature regimes. Crop Science, 45, 529-534.
DOI URL |
[3] | Berger JD, Kumar S, Nayyar H, Street KA, Sandhu JH, Henzell JM, Kaur J, Clarke HC (2012). Temperature-stratified screening of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genetic resource collections reveals very limited reproductive chilling tolerance compared to its annual wild relatives. Field Crop Science, 126, 119-129. |
[4] | Board JE, Kang MS, Bodrero ML (2003). Yield components as indirect selection criteria for late-planted soybean cultivars. Agronomy Journal, 95, 420-429. |
[5] | Board JE, Maricherla D (2008). Explanations for decreased harvest index with increased yield in soybean. Crop Science, 48, 1995-2002. |
[6] |
Cornic G (2000). Drought stress inhibits photosynthesis by decreasing stomata aperture―not by affecting ATP synthesis. Trends in Plant Science, 5, 187-188.
DOI URL |
[7] |
da Cruz RP, Golombieski JI, Bazana MT, Cabreira C, Silveira TF, da Silva LP (2010). Alterations in fatty acid composition due to cold exposure at the vegetative stage in rice. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology, 22, 199-207.
DOI URL |
[8] |
da Cruz RP, Sperotto RA, Cargnelutti D, Adamski JM, de Freitas Terra T, Fett JP (2013). Avoiding damage and achieving cold tolerance in rice plants. Food and Energy Security, 2, 96-119.
DOI URL |
[9] | Ensminger I, Busch F, Huner NPA (2006). Photostasis and cold acclimation: sensing low temperature through photosynthesis. Physiologia Plantarum, 126, 28-44. |
[10] | Fehr WR, Caviness CE (1977). Stages of soybean development. Cooperative Extension Service Special Report. Agricultural and Home Economics Experiment Station, Iowa State University. 80, 5-10. |
[11] |
Flexas J, Bota J, Loreto F, Cornic G, Sharkey TD (2004). Diffusive and metabolic limitations to photosynthesis under drought and salinity in C3 plants. Plant Biology, 6, 269-279.
URL PMID |
[12] | Flexas J, Bota J, Galmes J, Medrano H, Ribas-Carbo M (2006). Keeping a positive carbon balance under adverse conditions: responses of photosynthesis and respiration to water stress. Physiologia Plantarum, 127, 343-352. |
[13] |
Gendall AR, Levy YY, Wilson A, Dean C (2001). The VERNALIZATION 2 gene mediates the epigenetic regulation of vernalization in Arabidopsis. Cell, 107, 525-535.
DOI URL PMID |
[14] | Jiang HW, Li CD, Liu CY, Zhang WB, Qiu PC, Li WF, Gao YL, Hu GH, Chen QS (2009). Genotype analysis and QTL mapping for tolerance to low temperature in germination by introgression lines in soybean. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 35, 1268-1273. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 蒋洪蔚, 李灿东, 刘春燕, 张闻博, 邱鹏程, 李文福, 高运来, 胡国华, 陈庆山 (2009). 大豆导入系群体芽期耐低温位点的基因型分析及QTL定位. 作物学报, 35, 1268-1273.] | |
[15] | Kaur G, Kumar S, Nayyar H, Upadhyaya HD (2008). Cold stress injury during the pod-filling phase in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): effects on quantitative and qualitative components of seeds. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 194, 457-464. |
[16] | Lam HM, Chang RZ, Shao GH, Liu ZT (2009). Research on Tolerance to Stress in Chinese Soybean. China Agriculture Press, Beijing. 4-6. (in Chinese) |
[ 林汉明, 常汝镇, 邵桂花, 刘忠堂 (2009). 中国大豆耐逆研究. 中国农业出版社, 北京. 4-6.] | |
[17] |
Lane N, Martin WF (2012). The origin of membrane bioenergetics. Cell, 151, 1406-1416.
DOI URL PMID |
[18] | Luo J, Zhang H, Deng ZH, Xu LP, Xu LN, Yuan ZN, Que YX (2013). Analysis of yield and quality traits in sugarcane varieties (lines) with GGE-biplot. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 39, 142-152. (in Chinese with English Abstract) |
[ 罗俊, 张华, 邓祖湖, 许莉萍, 徐良年, 袁照年, 阙友雄 (2013). 应用GGE双标图分析甘蔗品种(系)的产量和品质性状. 作物学报, 39, 142-152.] | |
[19] |
Mizoi J, Ohori T, Moriwaki T, Kidokoro S, Todaka D, Maruyama K, Kusakabe K, Osakabe Y, Shinozake K, Yamaguchi-Shinozake K (2013). GmDREB2A;2, a Canonical DEHYDRATION-RESPONSIVE ELEMENT- BINDING PROTEIN2-type transcription factor in soybean, is posttranslationally regulated and mediates dehydration-responsive element-dependent gene expression. Plant Physiology, 161, 346-361.
DOI URL PMID |
[20] | Ohnishi S, Miyoshi T, Shirai S (2010). Low temperature stress at different flower development stages affects pollen development, pollination, and pot set in soybean. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 69, 56-62. |
[21] |
Pagter M, Arora R (2013). Winter survival and deacclimation of perennials under warming climate: physiological perspectives. Physiologia Plantarum, 147, 75-87.
URL PMID |
[22] | Qiu PC, Zhang WB, Jiang HW, Liu CY, Li CD, Fan DM, Zeng QL, Han DW, Hu GH, Chen QS (2011). Genetic overlap between salt and low-temperature tolerance loci at germination stage of soybean. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 44, 1980-1988. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 邱鹏程, 张闻博, 蒋洪蔚, 刘春燕, 李灿东, 范冬梅, 曾庆力, 韩冬伟, 胡国华, 陈庆山 (2011). 大豆芽期耐盐和耐低温位点的遗传重叠. 中国农业科学, 44, 1980-1988.] | |
[23] | Shimono H, Ishii A, Kanda E, Suto M, Nagano K (2011). Genotypic variation in rice cold tolerance responses during reproductive growth as a function of water temperature during vegetative growth. Crop Science, 290-297. |
[24] | Timlin D, Lutfor Rahman SM, Baker J, Reddy VR, Fleisher D, Quebedeaux B (2006). Whole plant photosynthesis, development, and carbon partitioning in potato as a function of temperature. Agronomy Journal, 98, 1195-1203. |
[25] | Yan WK (2001). GGE biplot—a windows application for graphical analysis of multienvironment trial data and other types of two-way data. Agronomy Journal, 93, 1111-1118. |
[26] |
Yan WK, Rajcan I (2002). Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Science, 42, 11-20.
DOI URL PMID |
[27] |
Yang JW, Zhu JG, Wang SG, Sun DZ, Shi YG, Chen WG (2013). Drought-resistance of local wheat varieties in Shanxi Province of China: a comprehensive evaluation by using GGE biplot and subordinate function. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 24, 1031-1038. (in Chinese with English Abstract)
URL PMID |
[ 杨进文, 朱俊刚, 王曙光, 孙黛珍, 史雨刚, 陈卫国 (2013). 用GGE双标图及隶属函数综合分析山西小麦地方品种抗旱性. 应用生态学报, 24, 1031-1038.]
URL PMID |
|
[28] | Yu ZW (2007). Special Crop Cultivation. China Agriculture Press, Beijing. 274-275. (in Chinese) |
[ 于振文 (2007). 作物栽培学各论. 中国农业出版社, 北京. 274-275.] | |
[29] | Zhai ZH, Wang XZ, Ding MX (2010). Cell Biology. 3rd edn. Higher Education Press, Beijing. 513-514. (in Chinese) |
[ 翟中和, 王喜忠, 丁明孝 (2010). 细胞生物学. 第三版. 高等教育出版社, 北京. 513-514.] | |
[30] | Zhang DW, Du XY, Liu CY, Shan DP, Wu Z, Chen QS, Hu GH (2010). Effect of low-temperature stress on physiological indexes of soybean at germination stage. Soybean Science, 29, 228-232. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 张大伟, 杜翔宇, 刘春燕, 单大鹏, 吴铮, 陈庆山, 胡国华 (2010). 低温胁迫对大豆萌发期生理指标的影响. 大豆科学, 29, 228-232.] | |
[31] | Zhao J (2009). Genetic Analysis to Yield Related Traits in Jinda52 × Jinda57 Cross Offspring Population. Master degree dissertation, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi. 55-56. (in Chinese) |
[ 赵晶 (2009). 晋大52×晋大57杂交后代产量相关性状的遗传分析. 硕士学位论文, 山西农业大学, 山西太谷. 55-56.] |
[1] | PENG Dong-Hai,YANG Jian-Bo,LI Jian,XING Yong-Xiu,QIN Liu-Dong,YANG Li-Tao,LI Yang-Rui. Effects of intercropping with soybean on bacterial and nitrogen-fixing bacterial diversity in the rhizosphere of sugarcane [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2014, 38(9): 959-969. |
[2] | LIU Hui-Liang, ZHANG Yong-Kuan, ZHANG Dao-Yuan, YIN Lin-Ke, ZHANG Yuan-Ming. Variation in fruit and seed traits and seed germination among different populations of Eremosparton songoricum [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2012, 36(8): 802-811. |
[3] | WANG Fang-Mei, CAI Miao-Zhen, ZHANG Shu-Na, WANG Ning, LI Hua-Fei, HU Xue-Na, YU Shu-Hang. Effects of nitric oxide and hydrogen peroxide on induction of a defense response in the root tips and root border cells of soybean plants to Al toxicity [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2011, 35(9): 981-989. |
[4] | SUN Ju, LI Xiu-Zhen, WANG Xian-Wei, LÜ Jiu-Jun, LI Zong-Mei, HU Yuan-Man. Analysis of structures of permafrost wetland plant communities along environmental gradients in the Da Hinggan Mountains, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2010, 34(10): 1165-1173. |
[5] | CAI Miao-Zhen, XING Cheng-Hua, LIU Peng, XU Gen-Di, WU Shao-Hui, HE Fan. DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF ROOT BORDER CELLS AND THEIR ASSOCIATED MUCILAGE EXUDATION IN SOYBEAN TO Al STRESS AND RECOVERY [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2008, 32(5): 1007-1014. |
[6] | YAN Mao-Fen, LI Xiang-Hua, WANG Ke-Jing. EVALUATION OF GENETIC DIVERSITY BY SSR MARKERS FOR NATURAL POPULATIONS OF WILD SOYBEAN (GLYCINE SOJA) GROWING IN THE REGION OF BEIJING, CHINA [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2008, 32(4): 938-950. |
[7] | MIAO Bao-He, LI Xiang-Dong, LIU Bo, HE Qi-Ping, ZHU Tao, LIU Xing-Tan, ZHU Qi-Yu, QIAO Guang-Fa, FAN Ting-An, CHEN Cheng-Jun, DONG Qing-Yu, YU Song-Lie. EFFECT OF WAVING-CANOPY CULTURAL TYPE ON ACTIVE OXYGEN AND MEMBRANE LIPID METABOLISM PEROXIDATION OF HIGH OIL SOYBEAN LEAVES [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2008, 32(3): 673-680. |
[8] | LI Rong-Feng, CAI Miao-Zhen, LIU Peng, XU Gen-Di, CHEN Min-Yan, LIANG He. PHYTOECOLOGICAL EFFECT OF Al3+ ON THE INDUCTIVITY OF PROGRAMMED CELL DEATH OF BORDER CELLS IN SOYBEAN ROOT [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2008, 32(3): 690-697. |
[9] | SONG Kai-Shan, ZHANG Bai, WANG Zong-Ming, LIU Dian-Wei, LIU Huan-Jun. SOYBEAN CHLOROPHYLL A CONCENTRATION ESTIMATION MODELS BASED ON WAVELET-TRANSFORMED, IN SITU COLLECTED, CANOPY HYPERSPECTRAL DATA [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2008, 32(1): 152-160. |
[10] | HU Zhi-Ang, JIANG Guo-Qiang, DENG Xin, WANG Hong-Xin. MOLECULAR ADAPTATION THROUGH DIVERSITY OF RETROTRANSPOSONS AND TRANSCRIPTIONAL FACTORS IN POPULATIONS OF WILD SOYBEAN (GLYCINE SOJA) [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2007, 31(5): 952-959. |
[11] | JI Feng_Yuan, WANG Ge_Liang, XU Yi_Nong. THE EFFECTS OF ANTIOXIDANTS ON THE TRANSIENT EXPRESSION OF GUS GENE IN SOYBEAN HYPOCOTYLS MEDIATED BY AGROBACTERIUM TUMEFACIENS [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2006, 30(2): 330-334. |
[12] | YANG Xiao-Jie, SUN Zhi-Lin. Effects of Aspirin(Asp) and Sulfamethoxazolum-Trimetho-Primum(Smz-Tmp) on Germination and Vigor of Soybean Seeds [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2003, 27(5): 667-671. |
[13] | QIANG Wei-Ya, CHEN Tuo, TANG Hong-Guan, FENG Hu-Yuan, AN Li-Zhe, WANG Xun-Ling. Effect of Cadmium and Enhanced UV-B Radiation on Soybean Root Excretion [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2003, 27(3): 293-298. |
[14] | ZHANG Shu-Ping, WANG Ren-Qing, ZHANG Zhi-Guo, GUO Wei-Hua, LIU Jian, SONG Bai-Min. Study on Morphological Variation of Phragmites Australis in the Yellow River Downstream Wetland [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2003, 27(1): 78-85. |
[15] | YANG Xiao-E, LONG Xin-Xian, NI Wu-Zhong, NI Shi-Feng. Zinc Tolerance and Hyperaccumulation in a New Ecotype of Sedum alfredii Hance [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2001, 25(6): 665-672. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn