Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improving drought tolerance of maize plants by up-regulation of aquaporin gene expressions in roots and the fungi themselves

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00973

Abstract

Abstract:

Aims It has been well demonstrated that arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi can improve water balance and drought tolerance of host plants under drought stress. However, controversy still exists in mechanisms underlying the mycorrhizal functions. For example, in different experiments AM fungi could up- or down-regulate plant aquaporin gene expression. Furthermore, little information is available on the expression of aquaporin genes in AM fungi under drought stress and its contribution to plant drought tolerance. We investigated the effects of an AM fungus, Glomus intraradices, on expression of a plasma membrane intrinsic protein (PIP) gene family containing 13 PIP genes in maize roots and one aquaporin gene from the AM fungus under simulated drought conditions. Our objectives were to systematically investigate the aquaporin gene expression in the mycorrhizal association in response to drought stress and to help understand the molecular basis for drought tolerance of AM symbiosis.
Methods Maize plants inoculated with/without AM fungus G. intraradices were grown under different water regimes in a controlled-environment climate chamber for 42 days. At harvest, the leaf water potential (Ψ) was determined with an SKPM 1400 pressure chamber, and then shoots and roots were collected and carefully cleaned with tap water. Three grams of mixed roots were used to estimate the percentage root colonization after clearing with 10% KOH and staining with 0.05% (v/v) trypan blue in lactic acid. One gram of mixed roots was used to extract total RNA by using TRIZOL to synthesize cDNA. Real-time PCR analysis was performed to estimate the expression of Zm PIP genes and GintAQP1. Shoots and the rest of roots were dried at 105 °C for 10 min and 80 °C for 48 h to obtain dry weights. About 0.2 g of dried shoots or roots was digested by HNO₃for 12 h. The P concentration was recorded by using microplate reader spectra at the wavelength of 820 nm. Experimental data were subjected to statistical analysis using SPSS 13.0.
Important findings Under drought stress, inoculation with AM fungus significantly enhanced expression of eight PIP genes except for Zm PIP1;3, Zm PIP1;4 Zm PIP1;5 and Zm PIP2;2 (Zm PIP2;7 expression not detected), and drought stress also enhanced expression of GintAQP1 cloned from hyphae of G. intraradices. Enhanced aquaporin gene expression was beneficial to improvement of plant water status and increase of leaf water potential.

Key words: aquaporin, arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus, drought tolerance, leaf water potential, maize

LI Tao, CHEN Bao-Dong. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improving drought tolerance of maize plants by up-regulation of aquaporin gene expressions in roots and the fungi themselves[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2012, 36(9): 973-981.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00973

https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/Y2012/V36/I9/973

Figures/Tables 8

Table 1 Mycorrhizal colonization rate of maize roots under different water regimes (mean ± SD, n = 4)

接种处理 Inoculation treatment	菌根侵染率 Mycorrhizal colonization rate (%)
接种处理 Inoculation treatment	正常水分 Well-watered	干旱 Drought
不接种 Non-inoculated	0.0	0.0
接种 Inoculated	35.1^*	38.5^{* #}

Fig. 1 Effects of inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus Glomus intraradices on maize dry weights under different water regimes (mean ± SD, n = 4). Two-way ANOVA and t-test were performed for shoots and roots, respectively. * indicates significant difference (p < 0.05) between inoculation treatments under the same water treatment.

Fig. 2 Effects of inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus Glomus intraradices on P concentration of maize under different water regimes (mean ± SD, n = 4). Two-way ANOVA and t-test were performed for shoots and roots, respectively. * indicates significant difference (p < 0.05) between inoculation treatments under the same water treatment.

Table 2 Two-way ANOVA of shoot and root dry weight, P concentration and leaf water potential as influenced by inoculation and water treatments

	地上部干重 Shoot dry weight	根部干重 Root dry weight	地上部磷含量 Shoot P concentration	根部磷含量 Root P concentration	叶片水势 Leaf water potential
接种处理 Inoculation treatment (I)	*	ns	*	ns	*
水分处理 Water treatment (W)	ns	ns	ns	ns	**
交互作用 I × W interaction	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns

Fig. 3 Effects of inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus Glomus intraradices on leaf water potential of maize under different water regimes (mean ± SD, n = 4). # indicates significant difference (p < 0.05) between water treatments under the same inoculation treatment.

Fig. 4 Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus Glomus intraradices on expression of plasma membrane aquaporin gene in maize roots under different water regimes (mean ± SD, n = 4). # indicates significant difference (p < 0.05) between water treatments under the same inoculation treatment. * indicates significant difference (p < 0.05) between inoculation treatments under the same water treatment. Statistical analysis was performed for each aquaporin gene respectively. D, drought treatment; W, well-watered treatment.

Table 3 Two-way ANOVA of gene expression of 12 Zm PIPs as influenced by inoculation and water treatments.

	Zm PIP1;1	Zm PIP1;2	Zm PIP1;3	Zm PIP1;4	Zm PIP1;5	Zm PIP1;6	Zm PIP2;1	Zm PIP2;2	Zm PIP2;3	Zm PIP2;4	Zm PIP2;5	Zm PIP2;6
接种处理 Inoculation treatment (I)	*	**	ns	ns	ns	**	**	**	**	*	**	**
水分处理 Water treatment (W)	**	**	ns	ns	*	ns	*	ns	ns	ns	**	ns
交互作用 I ×W interaction	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns	ns

Fig. 5 Effects of drought stress on expression of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus Glomus intraradices aquaporin gene (mean ± SD, n = 4). # indicates significant difference (p < 0.05) between water treatments under the same inoculation treatment.

References 37

1	Agre P, King LS, Yasui M, Guggino WB, Ottersen OP, Fujiyoshi Y, Engel A, Nielsen S ( 2002). Aquaporin water channels―from atomic structure to clinical medicine. Journal of Physiology, 542, 3-16.
2	Aharon R, Shahak Y, Wininger S, Bendov R, Kapulnik Y, Galili G ( 2003). Overexpression of a plasma membrane aquaporin in transgenic tobacco improves plant vigor under favorable growth conditions but not under drought or salt stress. Plant Cell, 15, 439-447.
3	Aroca R, Bago A, Sutka M, Paz JA, Cano C, Amodeo G, Ruiz-Lozano JM ( 2009). Expression analysis of the first arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi aquaporin described reveals concerted gene expression between salt-stressed and nonstressed mycelium. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interac- tions, 22, 1169-1178.
4	Augé RM ( 2001). Water relations, drought and vesicular- arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Mycorrhiza, 11, 3-42.
5	Bao SD ( 鲍士旦 ) (2000). Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis (土壤农化分析). China Agriculture Press, Beijing. 81. (in Chinese)
6	Barea JM, Jeffries P (1995). Arbuscular mycorrhizas in sustainable soil-plant systems. In: Varma A, Hock B eds. Mycorrhiza: Structure, Function, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology. Springer, New York. 521-561.
7	Biermann B, Linderman RG ( 1981). Quantifying vesicular- arbuscular mycorrhizae: a proposed method towards standardization. New Phytologist, 87, 63-67.
8	Boyer JS ( 1982). Plant productivity and environment. Science, 218, 443-448.
9	Chapin FS III, Mooney HA, Chapin MC, Matson P ( 2002). Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology. Springer, New York. 71-93.
10	Chaumont F, Barrieu F, Wojcik E, Chrispeels MJ, Jung R ( 2001). Aquaporins constitute a large and highly divergent protein family in maize. Plant Physiology, 125, 1206-1215.
11	Ciais PH, Reichstein M, Viovy N, Granier A, Ogée J, Allard V, Aubinet M, Buchmann N, Bernhofer C, Carrara A, Chevallier F, de Noblet N, Friend AD, Friedllingstein P, Grünwald T, Heinesch B, Keronen P, Knohl A, Krinner G, Loustau D, Manca G, Matteucci G, Miglietta F, Ourcival JM, Papale D, Pilegaard K, Rambal S, Seufert G, Soussana JF, Sanz MJ, Schulze ED, Vesala T, Valentini R ( 2005). Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature, 437, 529-533.
12	Danielson JÅH, Johanson U ( 2008). Unexpected complexity of the aquaporin gene family in the moss Physcomitrella patens. BMC Plant Biology, 8, 45.
13	Duncan DB ( 1955). Multiple range and multiple F-tests. Biometrics, 11, 1-42.
14	Fester T, Hause B ( 2007). Drought and symbiosis―Why is abscisic acid necessary for arbuscular mycorrhiza? New Phytologist, 175, 381-383.
15	Guenther JF, Roberts DM ( 2000). Water-selective and multifunctional aquaporins from Lotus japonicus nodules. Planta, 210, 741-748.
16	Hachez C, Moshelion M, Zelazny E, Cavez D, Chaumont F ( 2006). Localization and quantification of plasma membrane aquaporin expression in maize primary root: a clue to understanding their role as cellular plumbers. Plant Molecular Biology, 62, 305-323.
17	Javot H, Maurel C ( 2002). The role of aquaporins in root water uptake. Annals of Botany, 90, 301-313.
18	Li DD, Wu YJ, Ruan XM, Li B, Zhu L, Wang H, Li XB ( 2009). Expressions of three cotton genes encoding the PIP proteins are regulated in root development and in response to stresses. Plant Cell Reports, 28, 291-300.
19	Liu RJ ( 刘润进), Chen YL ( 陈应龙 ) (2007). Mycorrhizology (菌根学). Science Press, Beijing. 447-448. (in Chinese)
20	Lu RK ( 鲁如坤 ) (2000). Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis (土壤农业化学分析方法). China Agriculture Technology Press, Beijing. 12-16. (in Chinese)
21	Marjanović Ž, Uehlein N, Kaldenhoff R, Zwiazek JJ, Weiß M, Hampp R, Nehls U ( 2005). Aquaporins in poplar: What a difference a symbiont makes! Planta, 222, 258-268.
22	Ouziad F, Wilde P, Schmelzer E, Hildebrandt U, Bothe H ( 2006). Analysis of expression of aquaporins and Na +/H + transporters in tomato colonized by arbuscular mycor- rhizal fungi and affected by salt stress . Environmental and Experimental Botany, 57, 177-186.
23	Pfaffl MW ( 2001). A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Rese- arch, 29, e45.
24	Phillips JM, Hayman DS ( 1970). Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular- arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 55, 158-161.
25	Qian YB ( 钱亦兵), Jiang J ( 蒋进), Wu ZN ( 吴兆宁 ) ( 2003a). Soil heterogeneity and its impact on ecological distribution of plant community in the Aiby Lake area. Arid Land Geography (干旱区地理), 26, 217-222. (in Chinese with English abstract)
26	Qian YB ( 钱亦兵), Zhang LY ( 张立运), Wu ZN ( 吴兆宁 ) ( 2003b). Characteristics of eco-environment in the margin regions of the Junggar Basin, Xinjiang. Arid Land Geography (干旱区地理), 26, 30-36. (in Chinese with English abstract)
27	Ruiz-Lozano JM ( 2003). Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and alleviation of osmotic stress. New perspectives for molecular studies. Mycorrhiza, 13, 309-317.
28	Ruiz-Lozano JM, del Mar Alguacil M, Bárzana G, Vernieri P, Aroca R ( 2009). Exogenous ABA accentuates the differences in root hydraulic properties between mycorrhizal and non mycorrhizal maize plants through regulation of PIP aquaporins. Plant Molecular Biology, 70, 565-579.
29	Ruiz-Lozano JM, Porcel R, Aroca R ( 2006). Does the enhanced tolerance of arbuscular mycorrhizal plants to water deficit involve modulation of drought-induced plant genes? New Phytologist, 171, 693-698.
30	Siefritz F, Tyree MT, Lovisolo C, Schubert A, Kaldenhoff R ( 2002). PIP1 plasma membrane aquaporins in tobacco: from cellular effects to function in plants. Plant Cell, 14, 869-876.
31	Smart LB, Moskal WA, Cameron KD, Bennett AB ( 2001). Mip genes are down-regulated under drought stress in Nicotiana glauca. Plant and Cell Physiology, 42, 686-693.
32	Smith SE, Read DJ (1997). Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Academic Press, San Diego, USA. 573-610.
33	Suga S, Imagawa S, Maeshima M ( 2001). Specificity of the accumulation of mRNAs and proteins of the plasma membrane and tonoplast aquaporins in radish organs. Planta, 212, 294-304.
34	Wright SF (2005). Management of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. In: Zobel RW, Wright SF eds. Roots and Soil Management: Interactions between Roots and the Soil. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI. 183-197.
35	Ye Q, Wiera B, Steudle E ( 2004). A cohesion/tension mechanism explains the gating of water channels (aquaporins) in Chara internodes by high concentration. Journal of Experimental Botany , 55, 449-461.
36	Zézé A, Brou YC, Meddich A, Marty F ( 2008). Molecular identification of MIP genes expressed in the roots of an arbuscular mycorrhizal Trifolium alexandrium L. under water stress. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 78-83.
37	Zhu CF, Schraut D, Hartung W, Schäffner AR ( 2005). Differential responses of maize MIP genes to salt stress and ABA. Journal of Experimental Botany, 56, 2971-2981.

[1]	CHENG Ke-Xin, DU Yao, LI Kai-Hang, WANG Hao-Chen, YANG Yan, JIN Yi, HE Xiao-Qing. Genetic mechanism of interaction between maize and phyllospheric microbiome [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(2): 215-228.
[2]	WU Min, TIAN Yu, FAN Da-Yong, ZHANG Xiang-Xue. Hydraulic regulation of Populus tomentosa and Acer truncatum under drought stress [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(9): 1086-1097.
[3]	Li Yi-Bo, SONG He, ZHOU Li, XU Zhen-Zhu, ZHOU Guang-Sheng. Modeling study on photosynthetic-light response curves of a C₄ plant, maize [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2017, 41(12): 1289-1300.
[4]	Rong LI, Wei DANG, Jing CAI, Shuo-Xin ZHANG, Zai-Min JIANG. Relationships between xylem structure and embolism vulnerability in six species of drought tolerance trees [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2016, 40(3): 255-263.
[5]	LI Rong,JIANG Zai-Min,ZHANG Shuo-Xin,CAI Jing. A review of new research progress on the vulnerability of xylem embolism of woody plants [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2015, 39(8): 838-848.
[6]	MENG Fan-Chao, ZHANG Jia-Hua, YAO Feng-Mei. Interactive effects of elevated CO₂ concentration and increasing precipitation on yield and growth development in maize [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2014, 38(10): 1064-1073.
[7]	YANG Bin, XIE Fu-Ti, WEN Xue-Fa, SUN Xiao-Min, WANG Jian-Lin. Diurnal variations of soil evaporation δ¹⁸O and factors affecting it in cropland in North China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2012, 36(6): 539-549.
[8]	LI Xiu-Yuan, LIU Xi-Ping, Hang DUONG, Roger KJELGREN. Comparison of water-related physiological characteristics of Alnus maritima and A. incana growing in America [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2011, 35(1): 73-81.
[9]	JIA Shi-Fang, LI Cong-Feng, DONG Shu-Ting, ZHANG Ji-Wang. Physiological mechanism of shading stress on photosynthetic efficiency in summer maize (Zea mays) [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2010, 34(12): 1439-1447.
[10]	MA Shou-Chen, LI Feng-Min, XU Bing-Cheng, HUANG Zhan-Bin. EFFECTS OF ROOT PRUNING AT THE REGREENING STAGE ON DROUGHT TOLERANCE AND WATER USE EFFICIENCY OF WINTER WHEAT IN LATE GROWING STAGE [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2008, 32(5): 1194-1200.
[11]	LIU Tian-Xue, LI Chao-Hai, MA Xin-Ming, ZHAO Xia, LIU Shi-Ying. EFFECTS OF MAIZE INTERCROPPING WITH DIFFERENT GENOTYPES ON LEAF SENESCENCE AND GRAIN YIELD AND QUALITY [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2008, 32(4): 914-921.
[12]	LIU Guang-Cai, YANG Qi-Feng, LI Long, SUN Jian-Hao. INTERCROPPING ADVANTAGE AND CONTRIBUTION OF ABOVE- AND BELOW-GROUND INTERACTIONS IN WHEAT-MAIZE INTERCROPPING [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2008, 32(2): 477-484.
[13]	HUANG Ju-Ying, CAI Jing, JIANG Zai-Min, ZHANG Shuo-Xin, YU Hai-Long. RESPONSE OF XYLEM EMBOLISM TO PHOSPHORUS ADDITION UNDER DIFFERENT WATER REGIMES IN TWO TREE SPECIES [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2008, 32(1): 183-188.
[14]	LI Yi-Jun, XU Zhen-Zhu, WANG Yun-Long, ZHOU Li, ZHOU Guang-Sheng. LATENT AND SENSIBLE HEAT FLUXES AND ENERGY BALANCE IN A MAIZE AGROECOSYSTEM [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2007, 31(6): 1132-1144.
[15]	WANG Yi-Bo, FENG Hu-Yuan, QU Ying, CHENG Jia-Qiang, $\boxed{\hbox{WANG Xun-Ling}}$ , AN Li-Zhe. EFFECTS OF REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES ON UV-B-INDUCED ETHYLENE PRODUCTION IN LEAVES OF MAIZE SEEDLINGS [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2007, 31(5): 946-951.