Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (6): 1478-1495.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2025.0167 cstr: 32100.14.cjpe.2025.0167
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Xuan1, GAN Chang-Qing1, YUAN Qi-Hua2, YI Lin2, CAI Ke-Ke1, YOU Shan1, MA Wen-Yue1, ZHANG Xin-Na1,*(
)
Received:2025-05-12
Accepted:2025-07-24
Online:2026-06-28
Published:2026-08-26
Contact:
ZHANG Xin-Na
Supported by:WANG Xuan, GAN Chang-Qing, YUAN Qi-Hua, YI Lin, CAI Ke-Ke, YOU Shan, MA Wen-Yue, ZHANG Xin-Na. Effects of supplemental far-red light on photosynthetic parameters in Quercus variabilis under different growth light intensities[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(6): 1478-1495.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.17521/cjpe.2025.0167
Fig. 1 Spectral distribution of the QBS-1000W multispectral LED plant growth lamp, monochromatic far-red LED spotlight, natural sunlight (A) and representative time courses of net photosynthetic rate (A) and stomatal conductance (gs) during the high light induction phase (L1) and the dark relaxation phase (L2) (B). In panel A, the photon flux densities (400-800 nm) of the three light sources were: (583 ± 10) μmol·m-2·s-1 for the LED growth light, (149 ± 7) μmol·m-2·s-1 for the far-red LED spotlight, and (1 073 ± 16) μmol·m-2·s-1 for natural sunlight; In panel B, the gray and white areas represent periods under dark (0 μmol·m-2·s-1) and high light (1 100 μmol·m-2·s-1) conditions, respectively.
Fig. 2 Light response curves of net photosynthetic rate (A) of Quercus variabilis under 30% and 70% full sunlight irradiance (means ± SD, n = 5). PPFD, photosynthetic photon flux density.
| 测量阶段 Measurement phase | 参数 Parameter | 暗适应 Dark adaptation (L0) | 高光诱导 High light induction (L1) | 暗弛豫 Dark relaxation (L2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 光合稳态 Photosynthetic steady-state | 暗呼吸速率 Dark respiration rate | AL0 | / | AL2 |
| 净光合速率 Net photosynthetic rate | / | Amax | / | |
| 暗适应残留气孔导度 Dark-adapted residual stomatal conductance | gL0 | / | gL2 | |
| 气孔导度 Stomatal conductance | / | gmax | / | |
| 荧光稳态 Fluorescence steady-state | 非光化学淬灭系数 Non-photochemical quenching | NPQL0 | NPQL1 | NPQL2 |
| PSII实际量子效率 Effective quantum yield of PSII | ΦL0 | ΦL1 | ΦL2 | |
| 荧光诱导 Fluorescence induction | NPQ诱导状态 NPQ induction state | / | ISNPQ(50) | ISNPQ(40) |
| ΦPSII诱导状态 ΦPSII induction state | / | ISΦPSII(100) | ISΦPSII(25) |
Table 1 Abbreviations of parameters measured under different measurement light conditions and measurement phases
| 测量阶段 Measurement phase | 参数 Parameter | 暗适应 Dark adaptation (L0) | 高光诱导 High light induction (L1) | 暗弛豫 Dark relaxation (L2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 光合稳态 Photosynthetic steady-state | 暗呼吸速率 Dark respiration rate | AL0 | / | AL2 |
| 净光合速率 Net photosynthetic rate | / | Amax | / | |
| 暗适应残留气孔导度 Dark-adapted residual stomatal conductance | gL0 | / | gL2 | |
| 气孔导度 Stomatal conductance | / | gmax | / | |
| 荧光稳态 Fluorescence steady-state | 非光化学淬灭系数 Non-photochemical quenching | NPQL0 | NPQL1 | NPQL2 |
| PSII实际量子效率 Effective quantum yield of PSII | ΦL0 | ΦL1 | ΦL2 | |
| 荧光诱导 Fluorescence induction | NPQ诱导状态 NPQ induction state | / | ISNPQ(50) | ISNPQ(40) |
| ΦPSII诱导状态 ΦPSII induction state | / | ISΦPSII(100) | ISΦPSII(25) |
Fig. 3 Maximum steady-state net photosynthetic rate (Amax) (A), maximum steady-state stomatal conductance (gmax) (B), dark respiration rate (AL2) (C), and dark-adapted residual stomatal conductance (gL2) (D) of Quercus variabilis under different growth light and measurement light conditions (means ± SD, n = 5). Growth light intensities: 30% (PPFD = 450 μmol·m-2·s-1) and 70% (PPFD = 1 050 μmol·m-2·s-1) of full sunlight. Measuring light spectra: with 300 μmol·m-2·s-1 far-red light (300FR, R/FR = 1.4) or without far-red light (0FR). PPFD, photosynthetic photon flux density; PFDFR, far-red photon flux density; FR, far-red light. * indicates a significant difference; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ns, p ≥ 0.05. PPED, photosynthetic photon flux density.
Fig. 4 Curves of photosynthesis induction (A), gas exchange rate during the light-to-dark transition (B), stomatal opening (C), and stomatal dark relaxation (D) of Quercus variabilis under different growth light and measurement light conditions. In panels A, C, and D, the curves represent the mean curves fitted to a sigmoidal model using the induction parameters time constant (τ), lag time (λ) and maximum slope of the induction curve (SLmax); the colored shaded areas indicate the 95% confidence intervals of the fitted curves; the open points indicate the time at which the rate of change in net photosynthetic rate or stomatal conductance reaches its maximum, and the dashed lines represent the maximum rate of change. The black vertical line marks the time point at which the light condition changes. FR, far-red light; 0FR, without supplemental far-red light; 300FR, with 300 μmol·m-2·s-1 supplemental far-red light.
Fig. 5 Fitted parameters and the maximum slope of the induction curves (SLmax) for photosynthetic induction (A-C), stomatal induction (D-F), and stomatal relaxation (G-I) of Quercus variabilis under different growth light intensities and measurement light conditions (means ± SD, n = 5). All model fitting parameters were highly significant (p < 0.001). *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ns, p ≥ 0.05. FR, far-red light; 0FR, without supplemental far-red light; 300FR, with 300 μmol·m-2·s-1 supplemental far-red light. τ, time constant; λ, lag time.
Fig. 6 Non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) (A, C) and effective yield of photosystem II photochemistry (ΦPSII) (B, D) of Quercus variabilis under different growth light intensities and measurement light conditions (means ± SD, n = 5). *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ns, p ≥ 0.05. FR, far-red light; 0FR, without supplemental far-red light; 300FR, with 300 μmol·m-2·s-1 supplemental far-red light.
Fig. 7 Dynamics of non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) (A, B) and effective yield of photosystem II (ΦPSII) (C, D) during the high light induction phase (L1) and dark relaxation phase (L2) in Quercus variabilis under different growth light intensities and measurement light conditions (means ± SD, n = 5). In panel C, only the ΦPSII dynamics under measuring light without far-red light (FR) are shown, as the data under measuring light containing far-red light exhibited excessive variability and could not be reliably plotted. 0FR, without supplemental far-red light; 300FR, with 300 μmol·m-2·s-1 supplemental far-red light.
Fig. 8 Induction dynamics of non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) (A, C) and effective yield of photosystem Ⅱ (ΦPSII) (B, D) during the high-light induction (L1) and dark relaxation (L2) phases in Quercus variabilis under different growth light intensities and measurement light conditions (means ± SD, n = 5). *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ns, p ≥ 0.05. FR, far-red light; 0FR, without supplemental far-red light; 300FR, with 300 μmol·m-2·s-1 supplemental far-red light. IS, the proportion of the change in a parameter from its initial state to the steady state completed at a given time.
Fig. 9 CO2 response curves of Quercus variabilis under different growth light intensities and measurement light conditions (means ± SD, n = 5). FR, far-red light; 0FR, without supplemental far-red light; 300FR, with 300 μmol·m-2·s-1 supplemental far-red light; A, net photosynthetic rate; Ci, intercellular CO2 concentration.
| 变异来源 Source of variation | qP | Rlight (μmol·m-2·s-1) | Vcmax (μmol·m-2·s-1) | Jmax (μmol·m-2·s-1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 生长光强 Growth light intensity | 测量光质 Measurement light quality | ||||
| 30%全光照 30% full sunlight | 0FR | 0.51 ± 0.04 | 0.54 ± 0.05 | 46.6 ± 1.61 | 80.6 ± 5.06 |
| 300FR | 0.83 ± 0.03 | 0.52 ± 0.08 | 47.3 ± 2.06 | 98.2 ± 7.41 | |
| 70%全光照 70% full sunlight | 0FR | 0.65 ± 0.05 | 0.77 ± 0.08 | 58.1 ± 4.06 | 99.9 ± 5.61 |
| 300FR | 0.81 ± 0.03 | 0.78 ± 0.09 | 54.1 ± 2.24 | 124.0 ± 6.54 | |
| F | 光强 Light intensity | 2.57 | 8.76** | 13.59** | 15.87*** |
| 光质 Light quality | 38.55*** | 0.01 | 0.67 | 10.84** | |
| 交互 Interaction | 4.03 | 0.02 | 0.62 | 0.34 | |
Table 2 Photochemical quenching coefficient (qP), respiration rate in the light (Rlight), maximum carboxylation efficiency (Vcmax), and maximum electron transport rate (Jmax) of Quercus variabilis under different growth light intensities and measurement light conditions (means ± SD, n = 5)
| 变异来源 Source of variation | qP | Rlight (μmol·m-2·s-1) | Vcmax (μmol·m-2·s-1) | Jmax (μmol·m-2·s-1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 生长光强 Growth light intensity | 测量光质 Measurement light quality | ||||
| 30%全光照 30% full sunlight | 0FR | 0.51 ± 0.04 | 0.54 ± 0.05 | 46.6 ± 1.61 | 80.6 ± 5.06 |
| 300FR | 0.83 ± 0.03 | 0.52 ± 0.08 | 47.3 ± 2.06 | 98.2 ± 7.41 | |
| 70%全光照 70% full sunlight | 0FR | 0.65 ± 0.05 | 0.77 ± 0.08 | 58.1 ± 4.06 | 99.9 ± 5.61 |
| 300FR | 0.81 ± 0.03 | 0.78 ± 0.09 | 54.1 ± 2.24 | 124.0 ± 6.54 | |
| F | 光强 Light intensity | 2.57 | 8.76** | 13.59** | 15.87*** |
| 光质 Light quality | 38.55*** | 0.01 | 0.67 | 10.84** | |
| 交互 Interaction | 4.03 | 0.02 | 0.62 | 0.34 | |
| [1] |
Allen JF (2003). State transitions—A question of balance. Science, 299, 1530-1532.
DOI URL |
| [2] |
Baker NR (2008). Chlorophyll fluorescence: a probe of photosynthesis in vivo. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 59, 89-113.
DOI PMID |
| [3] | Beer C, Reichstein M, Tomelleri E, Ciais P, Jung M, Carvalhais N, Rödenbeck C, Arain MA, Baldocchi D, Bonan GB, Bondeau A, Cescatti A, Lasslop G, Lindroth A, Lomas M, et al. (2010). Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake: global distribution and covariation with climate. Science, 329, 834-838. |
| [4] | Blankenship RE (2014). Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis. Wiley, New York. |
| [5] |
Brownlee C, Kendrick RE (1977). Phytochrome and potassium uptake by mung bean hypocotyl sections. Planta, 137, 61-64.
DOI PMID |
| [6] | Carmo-Silva E, Scales JC, Madgwick PJ, Parry MAJ (2015). Optimizing Rubisco and its regulation for greater resource use efficiency. Plant, Cell & Environment, 38, 1817-1832. |
| [7] |
Chu ZY, Lu YJ, Chang J, Wang M, Jiang H, He JS, Peng CH, Ge Y (2011). Leaf respiration/photosynthesis relationship and variation: an investigation of 39 woody and herbaceous species in east subtropical China. Trees, 25, 301-310.
DOI URL |
| [8] |
Durand M, Brendel O, Buré C, Le Thiec D (2019). Altered stomatal dynamics induced by changes in irradiance and vapour-pressure deficit under drought: impacts on the whole-plant transpiration efficiency of poplar genotypes. New Phytologist, 222, 1789-1802.
DOI PMID |
| [9] |
Durand M, Stangl ZR, Salmon Y, Burgess AJ, Murchie EH, Robson TM (2022). Sunflecks in the upper canopy: dynamics of light-use efficiency in sun and shade leaves of Fagus sylvatica. New Phytologist, 235, 1365-1378.
DOI URL |
| [10] |
Emerson R, Lewis CM (1943). The dependence of the quantum yield of chlorella photosynthesis on wave length of light. American Journal of Botany, 30, 165-178.
DOI URL |
| [11] | Evans JR (1989). Partitioning of nitrogen between and within leaves grown under different irradiances. Functional Plant Biology, 16, 533-548. |
| [12] | Fan DY, Fitzpatrick D, Oguchi R, Ma WM, Kou JC, Chow WS (2016). Obstacles in the quantification of the cyclic electron flux around Photosystem I in leaves of C3 plants. Photosynthesis Research, 129, 239-251. |
| [13] |
Fan DY, Fu ZJ, Xu WT, Xie ZQ (2015). A new method to measure and calculate light intensity and light quality simultaneously by using portable spectrometer. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 39, 917-923.
DOI URL |
|
[樊大勇, 付增娟, 徐文婷, 谢宗强 (2015). 用便携式光谱仪同步测定和计算光强和光质的新方法. 植物生态学报, 39, 917-923.]
DOI |
|
| [14] |
Farquhar GD, von Caemmerer S, Berry JA (1980). A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta, 149, 78-90.
DOI PMID |
| [15] |
Finazzi G, Johnson GN (2016). Cyclic electron flow: facts and hypotheses. Photosynthesis Research, 129, 227-230.
DOI PMID |
| [16] |
Haldrup A, Jensen PE, Lunde C, Scheller HV (2001). Balance of power: a view of the mechanism of photosynthetic state transitions. Trends in Plant Science, 6, 301-305.
DOI PMID |
| [17] |
Harbinson J, Genty B, Baker NR (1989). Relationship between the quantum efficiencies of photosystems I and II in pea leaves. Plant Physiology, 90, 1029-1034.
DOI PMID |
| [18] | Holmes MG, Sager JC, Klein WH (1986). Sensitivity to far-red radiation in stomata of Phaseolus vulgaris L.: rhythmic effects on conductance and photosynthesis. Planta, 168, 516-522. |
| [19] |
Huché-Thélier L, Crespel L, Le Gourrierec J, Morel P, Sakr S, Leduc N (2016). Light signaling and plant responses to blue and UV radiations—Perspectives for applications in horticulture. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 121, 22-38.
DOI URL |
| [20] | Kaiser E, Morales A, Harbinson J, Heuvelink E, Prinzenberg AE, Marcelis LFM (2016). Metabolic and diffusional limitations of photosynthesis in fluctuating irradiance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Scientific Reports, 6, 31252. DOI: 10.1038/srep31252. |
| [21] |
Kirschbaum MUF, Pearcy RW (1988). Gas exchange analysis of the relative importance of stomatal and biochemical factors in photosynthetic induction in Alocasia macrorrhiza. Plant Physiology, 86, 782-785.
DOI PMID |
| [22] |
Lau OS, Deng XW (2010). Plant hormone signaling lightens up: integrators of light and hormones. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 13, 571-577.
DOI PMID |
| [23] |
Lazzarin M, Dupont K, van Ieperen W, Marcelis LFM, Driever SM (2025). Far-red light effects on plant photosynthesis: from short-term enhancements to long-term effects of artificial solar light. Annals of Botany, 135, 589-602.
DOI URL |
| [24] | Lichtenthaler HK, Babani F, Langsdorf G (2007). Chlorophyll fluorescence imaging of photosynthetic activity in sun and shade leaves of trees. Photosynthesis Research, 93, 235. DOI: 10.1007/s11120-007-9174-0. |
| [25] | Liu FS, Song QF, Yu GC, Mao LX, Zhu XG (2024). Photosynthetic system model and improvement of crop photosynthetic efficiency. Chinese Bulletin of Life Sciences, 36, 1123-1140. |
| [刘扶桑, 宋青峰, 于桂朝, 毛林雄, 朱新广 (2024). 光合作用系统模型与作物高光效改良. 生命科学, 36, 1123-1140.] | |
| [26] |
Liu L, Fu ZJ, Wang XP, Xu CY, Gan CQ, Fan DY, Soon Chow W (2023). Exposed anthocyanic leaves of Prunus cerasifera are special shade leaves with high resistance to blue light but low resistance to red light against photoinhibition of photosynthesis. Annals of Botany, 132, 163-177.
DOI PMID |
| [27] | Lu YC (2007). Effect of Community Stability of Quercus variabilis with Different Managing Measures. Master degree dissertation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi. |
| [卢彦昌 (2007). 不同经营措施对栓皮栎群落稳定性的影响. 硕士学位论文, 西北农林科技大学, 陕西杨凌.] | |
| [28] |
Maxwell K, Johnson GN (2000). Chlorophyll fluorescence—A practical guide. Journal of Experimental Botany, 51, 659-668.
DOI PMID |
| [29] |
McCree KJ (1972). The action spectrum, absorptance and quantum yield of photosynthesis in crop plants. Agricultural Meteorology, 9, 191-216.
DOI URL |
| [30] |
Melis A, Zeiger E (1982). Chlorophyll a fluorescence transients in mesophyll and guard cells: modulation of guard cell photophosphorylation by CO2. Plant Physiology, 69, 642-647.
DOI PMID |
| [31] | Miao YX, Gao XX, Li B, Wang WJ, Bai LQ (2023). Low red to far-red light ratio promotes salt tolerance by improving leaf photosynthetic capacity in cucumber. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 1053780. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1053780. |
| [32] |
Outlaw WH Jr, Mayne BC, Zenger VE, Manchester J (1981). Presence of both photosystems in guard cells of Vicia faba l: implications for environmental signal processing. Plant Physiology, 67, 12-16.
DOI PMID |
| [33] |
Oxborough K, Baker NR (1997). Resolving chlorophyll a fluorescence images of photosynthetic efficiency into photochemical and non-photochemical components —Calculation of qP and F′v/F′m without measuring F′o. Photosynthesis Research, 54, 135-142.
DOI |
| [34] | Park JU, An SK, Kim J (2023). Far-red light affects stomatal opening and evapotranspiration of sweet basil. Horticulturae, 9, 1095. DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae9101095. |
| [35] |
Pearcy RW, Seemann JR (1990). Photosynthetic induction state of leaves in a soybean canopy in relation to light regulation of Ribulose-1-5-bisphosphate carboxylase and stomatal conductance. Plant Physiology, 94, 628-633.
DOI PMID |
| [36] | Pérez-Ramos IM, Matías L, Gómez-Aparicio L, Godoy Ó (2019). Functional traits and phenotypic plasticity modulate species coexistence across contrasting climatic conditions. Nature Communications, 10, 2555. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-10453-0. |
| [37] |
Portis Jr AR (2003). Rubisco activase-Rubisco’s catalytic chaperone. Photosynthesis Research, 75, 11-27.
DOI |
| [38] | Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS, Vose JM, Volin JC, Gresham C, Bowman WD (1998). Relationships of leaf dark respiration to leaf nitrogen, specific leaf area and leaf life-span: a test across biomes and functional groups. Oecologia, 114, 471-482. |
| [39] |
Rossatto DR, Franco AC (2017). Expanding our understanding of leaf functional syndromes in savanna systems: the role of plant growth form. Oecologia, 183, 953-962.
DOI PMID |
| [40] |
Ruban AV (2015). Evolution under the sun: optimizing light harvesting in photosynthesis. Journal of Experimental Botany, 66, 7-23.
DOI PMID |
| [41] |
Salvucci ME, Portis AR Jr, Ogren WL (1985). A soluble chloroplast protein catalyzes ribulosebisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activation in vivo. Photosynthesis Research, 7, 193-201.
DOI PMID |
| [42] |
Satter RL, Galston AW (1973). Leaf movements: Rosetta stone of plant behavior? BioScience, 23, 407-416.
DOI URL |
| [43] | Schreiber U, Bilger W, Neubauer C (1995). Chlorophyll fluorescence as a nonintrusive indicator for rapid assessment of in vivo photosynthesis//Schulze ED, Caldwell MM. Ecophysiology of Photosynthesis. Springer, Berlin. 49-70. |
| [44] |
Sharkey TD (1985a). O2-insensitive photosynthesis in C3 plants: its occurrence and a possible explanation. Plant Physiology, 78, 71-75.
DOI URL |
| [45] |
Sharkey TD (1985b). Photosynthesis in intact leaves of C3 plants: physics, physiology and rate limitations. The Botanical Review, 51, 53-105.
DOI URL |
| [46] |
Sharwood RE (2017). Engineering chloroplasts to improve Rubisco catalysis: prospects for translating improvements into food and fiber crops. New Phytologist, 213, 494-510.
DOI PMID |
| [47] |
Smith SD, Huxman TE, Zitzer SF, Charlet TN, Housman DC, Coleman JS, Fenstermaker LK, Seemann JR, Nowak RS (2000). Elevated CO2 increases productivity and invasive species success in an arid ecosystem. Nature, 408, 79-82.
DOI |
| [48] |
Smith WK, Knapp AK, Reiners WA (1989). Penumbral effects on sunlight penetration in plant communities. Ecology, 70, 1603-1609.
DOI URL |
| [49] |
Sullivan JA, Deng XW (2003). From seed to seed: the role of photoreceptors in Arabidopsis development. Developmental Biology, 260, 289-297.
PMID |
| [50] | Sun CY (2014). The Effects of Seed Quercus variabilis with Different Light Front on the Growth Characteristics. Master degree dissertation, Guangxi University, Nanning. |
| [孙灿岳 (2014). 不同光照强度对栓皮栎幼苗生长特性影响. 硕士学位论文, 广西大学, 南宁.] | |
| [51] |
Tang YH, Hiroshi K, Mitsumasa S, Izumi W (1994). Characteristics of transient photosynthesis in Quercus serrata seedlings grown under lightfleck and constant light regimes. Oecologia, 100, 463-469.
DOI URL |
| [52] | Thornley JH (1976). Mathematical Models in Plant Physiology. Academic Press, London. |
| [53] |
Turnbull MH, Yates DJ (1993). Seasonal variation in the red/far-red ratio and photon flux density in an Australian sub-tropical rainforest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 64, 111-127.
DOI URL |
| [54] |
Valladares F, Allen MT, Pearcy RW (1997). Photosynthetic responses to dynamic light under field conditions in six tropical rainforest shrubs occuring along a light gradient. Oecologia, 111, 505-514.
DOI PMID |
| [55] |
Valladares F, Niinemets Ü (2008). Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 39, 237-257.
DOI URL |
| [56] |
Vandenbussche F, Pierik R, Millenaar FF, Voesenek LA, van der Straeten D (2005). Reaching out of the shade. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 8, 462-468.
DOI PMID |
| [57] |
Vialet-Chabrand S, Dreyer E, Brendel O (2013). Performance of a new dynamic model for predicting diurnal time courses of stomatal conductance at the leaf level. Plant, Cell & Environment, 36, 1529-1546.
DOI URL |
| [58] |
Wachendorf M, Küppers M (2017). The effect of initial stomatal opening on the dynamics of biochemical and overall photosynthetic induction. Trees, 31, 981-995.
DOI URL |
| [59] |
Wang F, Yan JR, Ahammed GJ, Wang XJ, Bu X, Xiang HZ, Li YB, Lu JZ, Liu YF, Qi HY, Qi MF, Li TL (2020). PGR5/PGRL1 and NDH mediate far-red light-induced photoprotection in response to chilling stress in tomato. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 669. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00669.
PMID |
| [60] |
Way DA, Pearcy RW (2012). Sunflecks in trees and forests: from photosynthetic physiology to global change biology. Tree Physiology, 32, 1066-1081.
DOI PMID |
| [61] |
Wright IJ, Reich PB, Cornelissen JHC, Falster DS, Garnier E, Hikosaka K, Lamont BB, Lee W, Oleksyn J, Osada N, Poorter H, Villar R, Warton DI, Westoby M (2005). Assessing the generality of global leaf trait relationships. New Phytologist, 166, 485-496.
DOI PMID |
| [62] | Yamori W, Makino A, Shikanai T (2016). A physiological role of cyclic electron transport around photosystem I in sustaining photosynthesis under fluctuating light in rice. Scientific Reports, 6, 20147. DOI: 10.1038/srep20147. |
| [63] |
Zeiger E, Armond P, Melis A (1981). Fluorescence properties of guard cell chloroplasts: evidence for linear electron transport and light-harvesting pigments of photosystems I and II. Plant Physiology, 67, 17-20.
DOI PMID |
| [64] |
Zhen SY, Bugbee B (2020). Far-red photons have equivalent efficiency to traditional photosynthetic photons: implications for redefining photosynthetically active radiation. Plant, Cell & Environment, 43, 1259-1272.
DOI URL |
| [65] |
Zhen SY, Haidekker M, van Iersel MW (2019). Far-red light enhances photochemical efficiency in a wavelength- dependent manner. Physiologia Plantarum, 167, 21-33.
DOI |
| [66] | Zhen SY, van Iersel M, Bugbee B (2021). Why far-red photons should be included in the definition of photosynthetic photons and the measurement of horticultural fixture efficacy. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 693445. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.693445. |
| [67] |
Zhen SY, van Iersel MW (2017). Far-red light is needed for efficient photochemistry and photosynthesis. Journal of Plant Physiology, 209, 115-122.
DOI PMID |
| [68] |
Zhen SY, van Iersel MW, Bugbee B (2022). Photosynthesis in Sun and shade: the surprising importance of far-red photons. New Phytologist, 236, 538-546.
DOI PMID |
| [69] |
Zhou XT, Li ZL, He JJ, Wang XY, Liu QL, Huang J, Xie YD, He ZQ (2021). Effects of red to far-red light ratio on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of tomato seedlings under calcium nitrate stress. Photosynthetica, 59, 625-632.
DOI |
| [1] | LONG Wen-Xing, DING Yi, ZANG Run-Guo, YANG Min, CHEN Shao-Wei. Environmental characteristics of tropical cloud forests in the rainy season in Bawangling National Nature Reserve on Hainan Island, South China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2011, 35(2): 137-146. |
| [2] | PIAO Shi-Long, FANG Jing-Yun, GUO Qing-Hua. Application of CASA Model to the Estimation of Chinese Terrestrial Net Primary Productivity [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2001, 25(5): 603-608. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2026 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn