Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2013, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (9): 820-829.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00086 cstr: 32100.14.SP.J.1258.2013.00086
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Li1,2,*(
), YANG Jia-Ni3, CUI Kai1, R. Talbot TROTTER4,5, LI Zheng-Hong1, LI Gen-Qian2, LIAO Sheng-Xi1
Received:2012-12-26
Accepted:2013-05-22
Online:2013-12-26
Published:2013-09-02
Contact:
LI Li
LI Li, YANG Jia-Ni, CUI Kai, R. Talbot TROTTER, LI Zheng-Hong, LI Gen-Qian, LIAO Sheng-Xi. Strobili and seed characteristics of Tsuga dumosa and its relationship with environmental factors[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2013, 37(9): 820-829.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00086
| 样地 SP | 经度 Longitude | 纬度 Latitude | 海拔 H (m) | 郁闭度 CD | 年平均 气温 MAT (℃) | 最冷月平 均气温 MTC (℃) | 最暖月平 均气温 MTW (℃) | 年降水量 AP (mm) | ≥10 ℃年 积温 AT≥10℃(℃) | 年日照 时数 ASH (h) | 相对 湿度 RH (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 99°48′ E | 26°39′ N | 3 027 | 0.48 | 10.8 | 3.1 | 15.5 | 1 351.9 | 3 046.7 | 2 003.6 | 78 |
| 2 | 99°25′ E | 26°83′ N | 2 840 | 0.62 | 14.7 | 3.8 | 18.2 | 1 066.5 | 3 371.6 | 2 196.8 | 74 |
| 3 | 99°18′ E | 26°27′ N | 2 956 | 0.55 | 12.1 | 3.6 | 17.2 | 1 022.3 | 3 211.0 | 2 176.4 | 73 |
| 4 | 100°42′ E | 24°29′ N | 2 704 | 0.72 | 17.6 | 10.9 | 22.8 | 1 103.5 | 6 398.1 | 2 100.9 | 76 |
| 5 | 101°37′ E | 24°23′ N | 2 890 | 0.61 | 16.8 | 10.3 | 20.9 | 961.3 | 5 711.4 | 2 133.2 | 71 |
| 6 | 101°22′ E | 24°11′ N | 2 700 | 0.70 | 17.4 | 10.5 | 21.6 | 952.7 | 5 722.8 | 2 252.4 | 69 |
| 7 | 100°16′ E | 27°09′ N | 2 925 | 0.59 | 16.3 | 9.7 | 20.1 | 1 121.7 | 4 832.5 | 2 092.6 | 77 |
| 8 | 98°50′ E | 25°21′ N | 2 810 | 0.64 | 15.6 | 8.1 | 20.9 | 974.2 | 4 929.4 | 2 379.6 | 72 |
Table 1 Geographical position, forest canopy density and climatic conditions of all populations
| 样地 SP | 经度 Longitude | 纬度 Latitude | 海拔 H (m) | 郁闭度 CD | 年平均 气温 MAT (℃) | 最冷月平 均气温 MTC (℃) | 最暖月平 均气温 MTW (℃) | 年降水量 AP (mm) | ≥10 ℃年 积温 AT≥10℃(℃) | 年日照 时数 ASH (h) | 相对 湿度 RH (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 99°48′ E | 26°39′ N | 3 027 | 0.48 | 10.8 | 3.1 | 15.5 | 1 351.9 | 3 046.7 | 2 003.6 | 78 |
| 2 | 99°25′ E | 26°83′ N | 2 840 | 0.62 | 14.7 | 3.8 | 18.2 | 1 066.5 | 3 371.6 | 2 196.8 | 74 |
| 3 | 99°18′ E | 26°27′ N | 2 956 | 0.55 | 12.1 | 3.6 | 17.2 | 1 022.3 | 3 211.0 | 2 176.4 | 73 |
| 4 | 100°42′ E | 24°29′ N | 2 704 | 0.72 | 17.6 | 10.9 | 22.8 | 1 103.5 | 6 398.1 | 2 100.9 | 76 |
| 5 | 101°37′ E | 24°23′ N | 2 890 | 0.61 | 16.8 | 10.3 | 20.9 | 961.3 | 5 711.4 | 2 133.2 | 71 |
| 6 | 101°22′ E | 24°11′ N | 2 700 | 0.70 | 17.4 | 10.5 | 21.6 | 952.7 | 5 722.8 | 2 252.4 | 69 |
| 7 | 100°16′ E | 27°09′ N | 2 925 | 0.59 | 16.3 | 9.7 | 20.1 | 1 121.7 | 4 832.5 | 2 092.6 | 77 |
| 8 | 98°50′ E | 25°21′ N | 2 810 | 0.64 | 15.6 | 8.1 | 20.9 | 974.2 | 4 929.4 | 2 379.6 | 72 |
| 样株 ST | 胸径 DBH (cm) | 株高 TH (m) | 冠幅 CB (m2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20.2 | 8.3 | 2.4 |
| 2 | 30.3 | 10.4 | 2.9 |
| 3 | 25.0 | 9.5 | 2.6 |
| 4 | 30.5 | 11.8 | 3.2 |
| 5 | 20.4 | 8.6 | 2.5 |
| 6 | 26.1 | 11.1 | 2.8 |
| 7 | 21.4 | 9.4 | 2.5 |
| 8 | 31.2 | 11.9 | 3.6 |
| 9 | 26.7 | 10.6 | 3.0 |
| 10 | 34.6 | 14.2 | 5.1 |
| 11 | 29.4 | 12.5 | 4.6 |
| 12 | 25.3 | 10.3 | 3.9 |
| 13 | 27.6 | 11.6 | 3.5 |
| 14 | 32.8 | 13.3 | 4.8 |
| 15 | 24.3 | 9.8 | 3.4 |
| 16 | 28.6 | 12.2 | 3.7 |
| 17 | 33.9 | 13.7 | 5.2 |
| 18 | 24.8 | 10.2 | 3.3 |
| 19 | 22.6 | 9.3 | 2.6 |
| 20 | 31.7 | 12.9 | 4.2 |
| 21 | 26.9 | 11.4 | 3.1 |
| 22 | 32.2 | 12.7 | 4.4 |
| 23 | 23.5 | 9.5 | 2.7 |
| 24 | 27.3 | 11.2 | 3.8 |
Table 2 Growth characteristics of strobili and seed of Tsuga dumosa
| 样株 ST | 胸径 DBH (cm) | 株高 TH (m) | 冠幅 CB (m2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20.2 | 8.3 | 2.4 |
| 2 | 30.3 | 10.4 | 2.9 |
| 3 | 25.0 | 9.5 | 2.6 |
| 4 | 30.5 | 11.8 | 3.2 |
| 5 | 20.4 | 8.6 | 2.5 |
| 6 | 26.1 | 11.1 | 2.8 |
| 7 | 21.4 | 9.4 | 2.5 |
| 8 | 31.2 | 11.9 | 3.6 |
| 9 | 26.7 | 10.6 | 3.0 |
| 10 | 34.6 | 14.2 | 5.1 |
| 11 | 29.4 | 12.5 | 4.6 |
| 12 | 25.3 | 10.3 | 3.9 |
| 13 | 27.6 | 11.6 | 3.5 |
| 14 | 32.8 | 13.3 | 4.8 |
| 15 | 24.3 | 9.8 | 3.4 |
| 16 | 28.6 | 12.2 | 3.7 |
| 17 | 33.9 | 13.7 | 5.2 |
| 18 | 24.8 | 10.2 | 3.3 |
| 19 | 22.6 | 9.3 | 2.6 |
| 20 | 31.7 | 12.9 | 4.2 |
| 21 | 26.9 | 11.4 | 3.1 |
| 22 | 32.2 | 12.7 | 4.4 |
| 23 | 23.5 | 9.5 | 2.7 |
| 24 | 27.3 | 11.2 | 3.8 |
Fig. 1 Shape of strobili, cone and seed of Tsuga dumosa and its habitat. A, Strobili and seed plant. B, Male and female strobilus (female strobilus in tip-growth; male strobilus with axillary). C, Female strobilus of pollination. D, Cone. E, Seed (clear away seed wing). F, Habitat of Tsuga dumosa.
| 差异源 Difference source | df | SS | MS | F | F0.05 | F0.01 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 上层 Upside layer | 5 | 5 716.335 | 1 143.267 | 127.353** | 8.754 | 9.932 |
| 中层 Middle layer | 5 | 2 654.246 | 530.849 | 61.267* | 8.754 | 9.932 |
| 下层 Under layer | 5 | 957.432 | 191.486 | 20.913 | 8.754 | 9.932 |
| 东向 East | 5 | 1 431.653 | 286.331 | 32.658 | 8.754 | 9.932 |
| 南向 South | 5 | 1 214.387 | 242.877 | 27.465 | 8.754 | 9.932 |
| 西向 West | 5 | 2 485.761 | 497.152 | 58.739* | 8.754 | 9.932 |
| 北向 North | 5 | 2 159.635 | 431.927 | 54.571* | 8.754 | 9.932 |
Table 3 Analysis of variance of strobili quantity of Tsuga dumosa in different canopy layers and orientations
| 差异源 Difference source | df | SS | MS | F | F0.05 | F0.01 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 上层 Upside layer | 5 | 5 716.335 | 1 143.267 | 127.353** | 8.754 | 9.932 |
| 中层 Middle layer | 5 | 2 654.246 | 530.849 | 61.267* | 8.754 | 9.932 |
| 下层 Under layer | 5 | 957.432 | 191.486 | 20.913 | 8.754 | 9.932 |
| 东向 East | 5 | 1 431.653 | 286.331 | 32.658 | 8.754 | 9.932 |
| 南向 South | 5 | 1 214.387 | 242.877 | 27.465 | 8.754 | 9.932 |
| 西向 West | 5 | 2 485.761 | 497.152 | 58.739* | 8.754 | 9.932 |
| 北向 North | 5 | 2 159.635 | 431.927 | 54.571* | 8.754 | 9.932 |
| 层次与方位 Layer and orientation | 平均值 Average ($\overline{X}$) | $\overline{X}$–14 876 | $\overline{X}$–18 651 | $\overline{X}$–19 206 | $\overline{X}$–20 309 | $\overline{X}$–21 098 | $\overline{X}$–22 796 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 上层 Upside layer | 41 592 | 26 716** | 22 941** | 22 386** | 21 283** | 20 494** | 18 796** |
| 中层 Middle layer | 22 796 | 7 920* | 4 145* | 3 590 | 2 487 | 1 698 | |
| 西向 West | 21 098 | 6 222* | 2 447 | 1 892 | 789 | ||
| 北向 North | 20 309 | 5 433* | 1 658 | 1 103 | |||
| 东向 East | 19 206 | 4 330 | 555 | ||||
| 南向 South | 18 651 | 3 775 | |||||
| 下层 Under layer | 14 876 |
Table 4 Multiple comparison of strobili quantity of Tsuga dumosa in different canopy layers and orientations
| 层次与方位 Layer and orientation | 平均值 Average ($\overline{X}$) | $\overline{X}$–14 876 | $\overline{X}$–18 651 | $\overline{X}$–19 206 | $\overline{X}$–20 309 | $\overline{X}$–21 098 | $\overline{X}$–22 796 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 上层 Upside layer | 41 592 | 26 716** | 22 941** | 22 386** | 21 283** | 20 494** | 18 796** |
| 中层 Middle layer | 22 796 | 7 920* | 4 145* | 3 590 | 2 487 | 1 698 | |
| 西向 West | 21 098 | 6 222* | 2 447 | 1 892 | 789 | ||
| 北向 North | 20 309 | 5 433* | 1 658 | 1 103 | |||
| 东向 East | 19 206 | 4 330 | 555 | ||||
| 南向 South | 18 651 | 3 775 | |||||
| 下层 Under layer | 14 876 |
| 差异源 Difference source | df | SS | MS | F | F0.05 | F0.01 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 上层 Upside layer | 5 | 653.426 | 130.685 | 55.418* | 2.749 | 3.861 |
| 中层 Middle layer | 5 | 1 175.248 | 235.050 | 104.136** | 2.749 | 3.861 |
| 下层 Under layer | 5 | 296.374 | 59.275 | 12.781 | 2.749 | 3.861 |
| 东向 East | 5 | 557.642 | 111.528 | 46.394* | 2.749 | 3.861 |
| 南向 South | 5 | 593.286 | 118.657 | 48.563* | 2.749 | 3.861 |
| 西向 West | 5 | 325.741 | 65.148 | 17.932 | 2.749 | 3.861 |
| 北向 North | 5 | 381.579 | 76.316 | 22.647 | 2.749 | 3.861 |
Table 5 Analysis of variance of seed quantity of Tsuga dumosa in different canopy layers and orientations
| 差异源 Difference source | df | SS | MS | F | F0.05 | F0.01 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 上层 Upside layer | 5 | 653.426 | 130.685 | 55.418* | 2.749 | 3.861 |
| 中层 Middle layer | 5 | 1 175.248 | 235.050 | 104.136** | 2.749 | 3.861 |
| 下层 Under layer | 5 | 296.374 | 59.275 | 12.781 | 2.749 | 3.861 |
| 东向 East | 5 | 557.642 | 111.528 | 46.394* | 2.749 | 3.861 |
| 南向 South | 5 | 593.286 | 118.657 | 48.563* | 2.749 | 3.861 |
| 西向 West | 5 | 325.741 | 65.148 | 17.932 | 2.749 | 3.861 |
| 北向 North | 5 | 381.579 | 76.316 | 22.647 | 2.749 | 3.861 |
| 层次与方位 Layer and orientation | 平均值 Average ($\overline{X}$) | $\overline{X}$–1 006 | $\overline{X}$–1 100 | $\overline{X}$–1 234 | $\overline{X}$–2 577 | $\overline{X}$–2 691 | $\overline{X}$–2 795 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 中层 Middle layer | 3 801 | 2 795** | 2 701** | 2 567** | 1 224 | 1 110 | 1 006 |
| 上层 Upside layer | 2 795 | 1 789* | 1 695* | 1 561* | 218 | 104 | |
| 南向 South | 2 691 | 1 685* | 1 591* | 1 457* | 114 | ||
| 东向 East | 2 577 | 1 571* | 1 477* | 1 343 | |||
| 北向 North | 1 234 | 228 | 134 | ||||
| 西向 West | 1 100 | 94 | |||||
| 下层 Under layer | 1 006 |
Table 6 Multiple comparison of seed quantity of Tsuga dumosa in different canopy layers and orientations
| 层次与方位 Layer and orientation | 平均值 Average ($\overline{X}$) | $\overline{X}$–1 006 | $\overline{X}$–1 100 | $\overline{X}$–1 234 | $\overline{X}$–2 577 | $\overline{X}$–2 691 | $\overline{X}$–2 795 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 中层 Middle layer | 3 801 | 2 795** | 2 701** | 2 567** | 1 224 | 1 110 | 1 006 |
| 上层 Upside layer | 2 795 | 1 789* | 1 695* | 1 561* | 218 | 104 | |
| 南向 South | 2 691 | 1 685* | 1 591* | 1 457* | 114 | ||
| 东向 East | 2 577 | 1 571* | 1 477* | 1 343 | |||
| 北向 North | 1 234 | 228 | 134 | ||||
| 西向 West | 1 100 | 94 | |||||
| 下层 Under layer | 1 006 |
| NFS | NMS | NCS | TH | DBH | CB | E | N | H | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NFS | 1.000 | 0.516 | 0.951** | 0.262 | 0.936** | 0.197 | 0.324 | -0.602 | -0.569 | |||||||||
| NMS | 1.000 | 0.768 | 0.374 | 0.943** | 0.524 | 0.635 | 0.278 | 0.433 | ||||||||||
| NCS | 1.000 | 0.067 | 0.925** | 0.873* | 0.147 | -0.094 | -0.902* | |||||||||||
| TH | 1.000 | 0.037 | 0.049 | -0.053 | 0.031 | -0.126 | ||||||||||||
| DBH | 1.000 | 0.856* | -0.089 | -0.046 | -0.154 | |||||||||||||
| CB | 1.000 | 0.072 | -0.025 | -0.098 | ||||||||||||||
| MTC | MTW | MAT | AT≥10℃ | AP | RH | ASH | CD | |||||||||||
| NFS | 0.513 | 0.632 | 0.458 | 0.715 | -0.746 | -0.619 | 0.885* | -0.731 | ||||||||||
| NMS | 0.648 | 0.724 | 0.605 | 0.793 | -0.681 | -0. 573 | 0.891* | -0.627 | ||||||||||
| NCS | 0.846* | 0.851* | 0.863* | 0.957** | 0.948** | 0.837* | 0.674 | -0.829* | ||||||||||
| TH | -0.710 | 0.203 | 0.114 | 0.074 | 0.054 | 0.092 | 0.380 | -0.016 | ||||||||||
| DBH | -0.345 | 0.428 | 0.309 | 0.831* | 0.876* | 0.704 | 0.538 | -0.064 | ||||||||||
| CB | -0.184 | 0.317 | 0.256 | 0.312 | 0.167 | 0.068 | 0.457 | 0.273 | ||||||||||
Table 7 Correlation coefficient between strobili and seed quantity, growth increment and environmental factors of Tsuga dumosa
| NFS | NMS | NCS | TH | DBH | CB | E | N | H | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NFS | 1.000 | 0.516 | 0.951** | 0.262 | 0.936** | 0.197 | 0.324 | -0.602 | -0.569 | |||||||||
| NMS | 1.000 | 0.768 | 0.374 | 0.943** | 0.524 | 0.635 | 0.278 | 0.433 | ||||||||||
| NCS | 1.000 | 0.067 | 0.925** | 0.873* | 0.147 | -0.094 | -0.902* | |||||||||||
| TH | 1.000 | 0.037 | 0.049 | -0.053 | 0.031 | -0.126 | ||||||||||||
| DBH | 1.000 | 0.856* | -0.089 | -0.046 | -0.154 | |||||||||||||
| CB | 1.000 | 0.072 | -0.025 | -0.098 | ||||||||||||||
| MTC | MTW | MAT | AT≥10℃ | AP | RH | ASH | CD | |||||||||||
| NFS | 0.513 | 0.632 | 0.458 | 0.715 | -0.746 | -0.619 | 0.885* | -0.731 | ||||||||||
| NMS | 0.648 | 0.724 | 0.605 | 0.793 | -0.681 | -0. 573 | 0.891* | -0.627 | ||||||||||
| NCS | 0.846* | 0.851* | 0.863* | 0.957** | 0.948** | 0.837* | 0.674 | -0.829* | ||||||||||
| TH | -0.710 | 0.203 | 0.114 | 0.074 | 0.054 | 0.092 | 0.380 | -0.016 | ||||||||||
| DBH | -0.345 | 0.428 | 0.309 | 0.831* | 0.876* | 0.704 | 0.538 | -0.064 | ||||||||||
| CB | -0.184 | 0.317 | 0.256 | 0.312 | 0.167 | 0.068 | 0.457 | 0.273 | ||||||||||
| 变量 Variable | 主成分 Principal component | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| E | 0.293 | 0.628 | 0.532 |
| N | 0.267 | 0.451 | 0.674 |
| H | -0.018 | 0.236 | 0.095 |
| MTC | 0.931 | -0.160 | 0.013 |
| MTW | 0.956 | -0.122 | 0.085 |
| MAT | 0.942 | -0.143 | 0.056 |
| AT≥10℃ | 0.984 | -0.097 | 0.132 |
| AP | -0.165 | 0.928 | -0.073 |
| RH | -0.240 | 0.745 | -0.327 |
| ASH | 0.021 | -0.252 | 0.896 |
| 特征值 Eigenvalue | 7.423 | 3.054 | 2.254 |
| 方差贡献率 % of variance | 52.367 | 21.246 | 8.132 |
| 累积贡献率 % of cumulative | 52.367 | 73.613 | 81.745 |
Table 8 First three principal component loadfactors of index
| 变量 Variable | 主成分 Principal component | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| E | 0.293 | 0.628 | 0.532 |
| N | 0.267 | 0.451 | 0.674 |
| H | -0.018 | 0.236 | 0.095 |
| MTC | 0.931 | -0.160 | 0.013 |
| MTW | 0.956 | -0.122 | 0.085 |
| MAT | 0.942 | -0.143 | 0.056 |
| AT≥10℃ | 0.984 | -0.097 | 0.132 |
| AP | -0.165 | 0.928 | -0.073 |
| RH | -0.240 | 0.745 | -0.327 |
| ASH | 0.021 | -0.252 | 0.896 |
| 特征值 Eigenvalue | 7.423 | 3.054 | 2.254 |
| 方差贡献率 % of variance | 52.367 | 21.246 | 8.132 |
| 累积贡献率 % of cumulative | 52.367 | 73.613 | 81.745 |
| [1] |
Chandler LM, Owens JN (2004). The pollination mechanism of Abies amabilis. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 34, 1071-1080.
DOI URL |
| [2] |
Cheng JG, Wang XF, Fan LZ, Yang XP, Yang PW (2009). Variations of Yunnan climatic zones in recent 50 years. Progress in Geography, 28, 18-24. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
|
[程建刚, 王学锋, 范立张, 杨晓鹏, 杨鹏武 (2009). 近50年来云南气候带的变化特征. 地理科学进展, 28, 18-24.]
DOI URL |
|
| [3] |
Diane RC, Kenneth JH (1993). Resource and pollen limitations to lifetime seed production in a natural plant population. Ecology, 74, 1043-1051.
DOI URL |
| [4] | Dunberg RA (1979). Flower induction in Norway spruce. In: Proceedings of the IUFRO Meeting of Working Parties on Norway Spruce Breeding. Bucharest, Romania.139-157. |
| [5] | Editorial Committee of Flora of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Flora of China (1978). Flora of China: Vol. 7. Science Press, Beijing.111-114. (in Chinese) |
| 中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会 (1978). 中国植物志: 第七卷. 科学出版社, 北京.111-114.] | |
| [6] | Li CG, Zhao XW (2005). Determining the optimum sample plots for establishing canopy density estimating equation in monitoring area. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 27(6),24-28. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [李崇贵, 赵宪文 (2005). 确定监测区域建立森林郁闭度估测方程最优样地的研究. 北京林业大学学报, 27(6),24-28.] | |
| [7] | Li L, Li K, Cui K (2008). Phenotypic variation of geographic provenance in Tsuga dumosa. Forest Research, 21, 31-36. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [李立, 李昆, 崔凯 (2008). 云南铁杉地理种源表型变异研究. 林业科学研究, 21, 31-36.] | |
| [8] | Liu LH, Qiu XZ (1980). Studies on geographic distributions and situations of vertical zone of the Chinese Tsuga forest. Acta Botanica Yunnanica, 2, 12-15. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [刘伦辉, 邱学忠 (1980). 我国铁杉林的地理分布及垂直带位置的研究. 云南植物研究, 2, 12-15.] | |
| [9] | Qin GF, Wang MC (1991). A preliminary study on the flowering and fruitfulness in Pinus massoniana. Forest Research, 4, 328-331. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [秦国峰, 汪名昌 (1991). 马尾松开花结实规律的初步研究. 林业科学研究, 4, 328-331.] | |
| [10] | Qin J, Ju JH, Xie MS (1997). Low Latitude Plateau Weather Climate. China Meteorological Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
| [秦剑, 琚建华, 解明思 (1997). 低纬高原天气气候. 中国气象出版社, 北京.] | |
| [11] | Southwest Forestry University and Forestry Department of Yunnan Province (1988). Tree Photos of Yunnan. Yunnan Science & Technology Press, Kunming. 66-68. (in Chinese) |
| 西南林学院和云南省林业厅 (1988). 云南树木图志. 云南科技出版社, 昆明.66-68.] | |
| [12] | Sun HZ, Shi LY (2004). The law of seed harvest of Scotch pine in the sandy area. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 32(4),6-8. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [孙洪志, 石丽艳 (2004). 沙地樟子松的结实规律. 东北林业大学学报, 32(4),6-8.] | |
| [13] | Sun WS (2006). Study on Management Techniques of Korean Pine Seed Orchard for High Genetic Quality and Ample Production of Seeds. PhD dissertation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| 孙文生 (2006). 红松种子园优质高产经营技术研究. 博士学位论文, 北京林业大学, 北京.]. | |
| [14] | Sun YL, Li QM, Xie ZQ (2005). Fruiting characteristics of the endangered species Abies chensiensis. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 29, 251-257. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [孙玉玲, 李庆梅, 谢宗强 (2005). 濒危植物秦岭冷杉结实特性的研究. 植物生态学报, 29, 251-257.] | |
| [15] | Suo QS (1982). Studies on the fruiting rule in natural stand of Larix olgensis Henry in Zhanbei Mountain range. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 18(4),47-56. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [索启善 (1982). 长白落叶松天然林结实规律的研究. 林业科学, 18(4),47-56.] | |
| [16] |
Takaso T, Owens JN (1995). Ovulate cone morphology and pollination in Pseudotsuga and Cedrus. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 156, 630-639.
DOI URL |
| [17] | Thtob EB (1991). Relationships on the flowering and fruit of Pinus sibirica. World Forestry Congress,64-69. |
| [18] | Wang BY (2008). Reproductive Ecology of Taxus yunnanensis. PhD dissertation, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| 王兵益 (2008). 云南红豆杉生殖生态学研究. 博士学位论文, 中国林业科学研究院, 北京.]. | |
| [19] | Wang DZ, Sun GQ, Guo ZF (2008). A case study on estimating natural forest age with DBH distribution and forest growth model. Ecology and Environment, 17, 1999-2003. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [王殿中, 孙国清, 过志峰 (2008). 天然林林龄的模拟估算及案例. 生态环境, 17, 1999-2003.] | |
| [20] | Wang Y (2006). Yunnan Mountain Climate. Yunnan Science & Technology Press, Kunming. (in Chinese) |
| [王宇 (2006). 云南山地气候. 云南科技出版社, 昆明. ]. | |
| [21] | Wu CZ, Hong W (2002). A proposed multidimensional time series model of individual age and diameter in Tsuga longibracteata. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 26, 403-407. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [吴承祯, 洪伟 (2002). 长苞铁杉种群个体年龄与胸径的多维时间序列模型研究. 植物生态学报, 26, 403-407.] | |
| [22] |
Yang K, Hu J, Sun BG, Yu HZ, Wu KX (2008). Chronic regularity in bearing fruit of Larix gmelinii and influence factors. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 44(6),53-59. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
|
[杨凯, 胡静, 孙宝刚, 于洪芝, 吴克贤 (2008). 兴安落叶松的结实规律及其影响因子. 林业科学, 44(6),53-59.]
DOI URL |
|
| [23] | Zhang YJ, Dai WF, Cheng JG (2007). The analysis of the processes of strong cold air in spring in Yunnan. Yunnan Geographic Environment Research, 19(3),15-17, 25. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [张云瑾, 戴卫帮, 程建刚 (2007). 云南省“倒春寒”灾害性天气的研究. 云南地理环境研究, 19(3),15-17, 25.]. | |
| [24] | Zhao YX, Luo XD, Zhou J (2004). Lignans from Tsuga dumosa. Acta Botanica Yunnanica, 26, 229-233. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [赵友兴, 罗晓东, 周俊 (2004). 云南铁杉中的木脂素成分. 云南植物研究, 26, 229-233.] |
| [1] | guangjin wu, 郭 垚鑫, Ren Chengjie, Wang Jun, YUE Ming, Zhao Fazhu. Distribution of soil organic carbon content and its influencing factors in different vegetation type on the northern foot of the Qinling Mountains [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(预发表): 1-. |
| [2] | TIAN Di, CHI Xiao-Long, SHI Liang, LIU Xiao-Han, ZHAO Chang-Ti, WU Mei, ZHANG Yu-Zhong, GAO Yong-Liang. Stoichiometric characteristics of dominant afforestation tree species and their environmental drivers in Saihanba region [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(2): 362-373. |
| [3] | WEI Xin, JIANG Lan, ZHENG Chen-Cheng, ZHU Jing, CHEN Bo, LI Wen-Zhou, LAI Shu-Yu, LIU Jin-Fu, HE Zhong-Sheng. Distribution and influencing factors of woody plant sexual systems along elevational gradient on the south slope of Daiyun Mountain [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(1): 150-159. |
| [4] | HAN Peng-Bin, PEI Kang-Di, HE Bin, XIAO Shu-Li, TANG Cindy Q.. Community composition and characteristics of Tsuga dumosa forests in China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2025, 49(6): 840-851. |
| [5] | HUANG Mei-Hong, NIU Meng-Qiu, YANG Peng-Fei, LIN Jie, LIAO Zhou-Yu, CHEN Jian-Guo, XIANG Jian-Ying. Effects of temperature and burial depth on seedling emergence and growth of the alpine cushion plant Arenaria oreophila [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2025, 49(12): 2092-2104. |
| [6] | ZHU Wan-Kuan, XU Yu-Xing, HUANG Run-Xia, DU A-Peng, WANG Zhi-Chao. Differences in water use efficiency between dry and rainy seasons and their controlling factors in Eucalyptus plantation in Leizhou Peninsula [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2025, 49(12): 2015-2029. |
| [7] | FU Zhao-Qi, HU Xu, TIAN Qin-Rui, GE Yan-Ling, ZHOU Hong-Juan, WU Xiao-Yun, CHEN Li-Xin. Nocturnal sap flow characteristics of two typical forest tree species and responses to environmental factors in the loess region of West Shanxi, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(9): 1128-1142. |
| [8] | PAN Yuan-Fang, PAN Liang-Hao, QIU Si-Ting, QIU Guang-Long, SU Zhi-Nan, SHI Xiao-Fang, FAN Hang-Qing. Variations in tree height among mangroves and their environmental adaptive mechanisms in China’s coastal areas [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(4): 483-495. |
| [9] | WANG Li-Li, SONG Xiao-Tong, GU Ji-Qi, SHAO Xiao-Ming. Relationship between morphological characteristics of Didymodon constrictus and environmental changes in Xizang and its response strategies [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(10): 1351-1360. |
| [10] | ZHAO Meng-Juan, JIN Guang-Ze, LIU Zhi-Li. Vertical variations in leaf functional traits of three typical ferns in mixed broadleaved- Korean pine forest [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(8): 1131-1143. |
| [11] | LI An-Yan, HUANG Xian-Fei, TIAN Yuan-Bin, DONG Ji-Xing, ZHENG Fei-Fei, XIA Pin-Hua. Chlorophyll a variation and its driving factors during phase shift from macrophyte- to phytoplankton-dominated states in Caohai Lake, Guizhou, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(8): 1171-1181. |
| [12] | YANG Li-Lin, XING Wan-Qiu, WANG Wei-Guang, CAO Ming-Zhu. Variation of sap flow rate of Cunninghamia lanceolata and its response to environmental factors in the source area of Xinʼanjiang River [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(4): 571-583. |
| [13] | ZHAO Zhen-Xian, CHEN Yin-Ping, WANG Li-Long, WANG Tong-Tong, LI Yu-Qiang. Comparison on leaf construction cost of different plant groups in the desert area of the Hexi Corridor [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(11): 1551-1560. |
| [14] | ZHANG Xiao, WU Juan-Juan, JIA Guo-Dong, LEI Zi-Ran, ZHANG Long-Qi, LIU Rui, LÜ Xiang-Rong, DAI Yuan-Meng. Effects of precipitation variations on characteristics of sap flow and water source of Platycladus orientalis [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(11): 1585-1599. |
| [15] | ZHENG Ning, LI Su-Ying, WANG Xin-Ting, LÜ Shi-Hai, ZHAO Peng-Cheng, ZANG Chen, XU Yu-Long, HE Jing, QIN Wen-Hao, GAO Heng-Rui. Dominance of different plant life forms in the typical steppe evidenced from impacts of environmental factors on chlorophyll [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(8): 951-960. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2026 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn