Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2007, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 842-849.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0106
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Yun-Xia1,2, LI Xiao-Bing1,*(), ZHANG Yun-Fei3
Received:
2006-02-01
Accepted:
2006-09-13
Online:
2007-02-01
Published:
2007-09-30
Contact:
LI Xiao-Bing
ZHANG Yun-Xia, LI Xiao-Bing, ZHANG Yun-Fei. DETERMINING VEGETATION COVER BASED ON FIELD DATA AND MULTI-SCALE REMOTELY SENSED DATA[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2007, 31(5): 842-849.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.17521/cjpe.2007.0106
数据 Data | 年-月-日 Year-month-day | 波段 Band | 分辨率 Resolution | 图像质量 Imagine quality | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MODIS | 2002-7-30 | 1, 2 | 250 m | 较好 Better | |||||||||||||
ASTER | 2002-7-30 | 1, 2, 3 | 15 m | 一般 Generic |
Table 1 Remotely sensed data listing
数据 Data | 年-月-日 Year-month-day | 波段 Band | 分辨率 Resolution | 图像质量 Imagine quality | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MODIS | 2002-7-30 | 1, 2 | 250 m | 较好 Better | |||||||||||||
ASTER | 2002-7-30 | 1, 2, 3 | 15 m | 一般 Generic |
植被指数 Vegetation index | 计算公式 Calculating formula |
---|---|
归一化植被指数NDVI | (NIR-R)/(NIR+R) |
归一化差异绿度指数NDGI | (G-R)/(G+R) |
比值植被指数RVI | R/NIR |
Table 2 Vegetation index listing
植被指数 Vegetation index | 计算公式 Calculating formula |
---|---|
归一化植被指数NDVI | (NIR-R)/(NIR+R) |
归一化差异绿度指数NDGI | (G-R)/(G+R) |
比值植被指数RVI | R/NIR |
样方大小 The size of sample sites (m×m) | ASTER影像 ASTER images (像元×像元)(pixel×pixel) |
---|---|
15×15 | 1×1 |
30×30 | 2×2 |
60×60 | 4×4 |
Table 3 The matching scheme between the sizes of sample sites and the pixels of ASTER image
样方大小 The size of sample sites (m×m) | ASTER影像 ASTER images (像元×像元)(pixel×pixel) |
---|---|
15×15 | 1×1 |
30×30 | 2×2 |
60×60 | 4×4 |
相片号 Photo number | 相对误差 Relative error (%) | 相片号 Photo number | 相对误差 Relative error (%) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 19.9 | 17 | 18.7 |
2 | 19.8 | 18 | 20.0 |
3 | 19.9 | 19 | 10.5 |
4 | 20.0 | 20 | 20.0 |
5 | 20.0 | 21 | 19.9 |
6 | 20.4 | 22 | 20.0 |
7 | 20.0 | 23 | 20.0 |
8 | 20.2 | 24 | 20.0 |
9 | 20.0 | 25 | 19.9 |
10 | 2.8 | 26 | 20.0 |
11 | 1.9 | 27 | 20.0 |
12 | 20.0 | 28 | 3.4 |
13 | 8.2 | 29 | 19.9 |
14 | 1.0 | 30 | 20.0 |
15 | 20.0 | 31 | 16.7 |
16 | 20.0 | 32 | 2.1 |
Table 4 The relative error of information extracting model
相片号 Photo number | 相对误差 Relative error (%) | 相片号 Photo number | 相对误差 Relative error (%) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 19.9 | 17 | 18.7 |
2 | 19.8 | 18 | 20.0 |
3 | 19.9 | 19 | 10.5 |
4 | 20.0 | 20 | 20.0 |
5 | 20.0 | 21 | 19.9 |
6 | 20.4 | 22 | 20.0 |
7 | 20.0 | 23 | 20.0 |
8 | 20.2 | 24 | 20.0 |
9 | 20.0 | 25 | 19.9 |
10 | 2.8 | 26 | 20.0 |
11 | 1.9 | 27 | 20.0 |
12 | 20.0 | 28 | 3.4 |
13 | 8.2 | 29 | 19.9 |
14 | 1.0 | 30 | 20.0 |
15 | 20.0 | 31 | 16.7 |
16 | 20.0 | 32 | 2.1 |
模型 Model | 植被指数 Vegetation index | 样地尺度 Sample size (m×m) | a | b | c | R |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
线性 | NDVI | 15×15 | 0.350 | 0.153 | — | 0.573** |
Linear | 30×30 | 0.412 | 0.170 | — | 0.602*** | |
60×60 | 0.480 | 0.170 | — | 0.655*** | ||
非线性 | 15×15 | 0.161 | 0.259 | 0.151 | 0.579** | |
Non linear | 30×30 | 0.053 | 0.387 | 0.169 | 0.602*** | |
60×60 | -0.076 | 0.516 | 0.171 | 0.656*** | ||
线性 | NDGI | 15×15 | 0.595 | 0.053 | — | 0.507* |
Linear | 30×30 | 0.818 | 0.036 | — | 0.552* | |
60×60 | 0.948 | 0.011 | — | 0.608*** | ||
非线性 | 15×15 | 1.161 | -0.206 | 0.154 | 0.538* | |
Non linear | 30×30 | 1.607 | -0.121 | 0.142 | 0.570** | |
60×60 | 0.233 | 0.812 | 0.027 | 0.608*** | ||
线性 | RVI | 15×15 | -1.232 | 0.086 | — | 0.506* |
Linear | 30×30 | -1.727 | 0.075 | — | 0.577** | |
60×60 | -1.907 | 0.062 | — | 0.598** | ||
非线性 | 15×15 | 5.924 | 0.195 | 0.141 | 0.541* | |
Non linear | 30×30 | 7.587 | -0.083 | 0.135 | 0.596** | |
60×60 | 6.952 | -0.394 | 0.119 | 0.612*** |
Table 5 The first stage experiential models(n=20)
模型 Model | 植被指数 Vegetation index | 样地尺度 Sample size (m×m) | a | b | c | R |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
线性 | NDVI | 15×15 | 0.350 | 0.153 | — | 0.573** |
Linear | 30×30 | 0.412 | 0.170 | — | 0.602*** | |
60×60 | 0.480 | 0.170 | — | 0.655*** | ||
非线性 | 15×15 | 0.161 | 0.259 | 0.151 | 0.579** | |
Non linear | 30×30 | 0.053 | 0.387 | 0.169 | 0.602*** | |
60×60 | -0.076 | 0.516 | 0.171 | 0.656*** | ||
线性 | NDGI | 15×15 | 0.595 | 0.053 | — | 0.507* |
Linear | 30×30 | 0.818 | 0.036 | — | 0.552* | |
60×60 | 0.948 | 0.011 | — | 0.608*** | ||
非线性 | 15×15 | 1.161 | -0.206 | 0.154 | 0.538* | |
Non linear | 30×30 | 1.607 | -0.121 | 0.142 | 0.570** | |
60×60 | 0.233 | 0.812 | 0.027 | 0.608*** | ||
线性 | RVI | 15×15 | -1.232 | 0.086 | — | 0.506* |
Linear | 30×30 | -1.727 | 0.075 | — | 0.577** | |
60×60 | -1.907 | 0.062 | — | 0.598** | ||
非线性 | 15×15 | 5.924 | 0.195 | 0.141 | 0.541* | |
Non linear | 30×30 | 7.587 | -0.083 | 0.135 | 0.596** | |
60×60 | 6.952 | -0.394 | 0.119 | 0.612*** |
模型 Model | 植被指数 Vegetation index | a | b | c | R |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
线性 Linear | NDVI | 0.711 | -0.043 | — | 0.640** |
非线性 Non linear | 1.395 | -0.343 | 0.144 | 0.656** | |
线性 Linear | RVI | -0.506 | 0.434 | — | 0.577* |
非线性 Non linear | 3.201 | -3.503 | 1.112 | 0.717** |
Table 6 The second stage experiential models (n=20)
模型 Model | 植被指数 Vegetation index | a | b | c | R |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
线性 Linear | NDVI | 0.711 | -0.043 | — | 0.640** |
非线性 Non linear | 1.395 | -0.343 | 0.144 | 0.656** | |
线性 Linear | RVI | -0.506 | 0.434 | — | 0.577* |
非线性 Non linear | 3.201 | -3.503 | 1.112 | 0.717** |
[1] | Fazakas Z, Nilsson M (1996). Volume and forest cover estimation over southern sweden using AVHRR data calibrated with TM data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17,1701-1709. |
[2] | Ignatov GGA (1998). The derivation of the green vegetation fraction from NOAA/AVHRR data for use in numerical weather prediction models. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19,1533-1543. |
[3] | Liu HP (刘慧平), Zhu QJ (朱启疆) (1999). Studies of methodologies and their development on land-use/cover change detection by using high spatial resolution remote sensing data. Resources Science (资源科学), 21(3),23-27. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[4] | Peter MA, Curran PJ (1997). Choosing an appropriate spatial resolution for remote sensing investigations. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 63,1345-1351. |
[5] | Purevdorj TS, Tateishi R, Ishiyama T, Honda Y (1998). Relationships between percent vegetation cover and vegetation indices. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19,3519-3535. |
[6] | Qi J, Marsett RC, Moran MS, Goodrich DC, Heilman P, Kerr Y, Dedieu G, Chehbouni A, Zhang Y (2000). Spatial and temporal dynamics of vegetation in the San Pedro River Basin area. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 105,55-68. |
[7] | Yang J, Prince SD (2000). Remote sensing of savanna vegetation changes in eastern Zambia 1972-1989. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21,301-322. |
[8] | Zhang RH (张仁华), Sun XM (孙晓敏), Zhu ZL (朱治林) (1997). Scale transformation and realistic quantitative remote sensing in IMGRASS. Climatic and Environmental Research (气候与环境研究), 2,310-315. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | Ke-Yu CHEN Sen Xing Yu Tang Sun JiaHui Shijie Ren Bao-Ming JI. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community characteristics and driving factors in different grassland types [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(5): 660-674. |
[2] | Yi-Heng Chen Yusupjan Rusul 吾斯曼 阿卜杜热合曼. Analysis of spatial and temporal variation in grassland vegetation cover in the Tianshan Mountains and the driving factors from 2001 to 2020 [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(5): 561-576. |
[3] | Hao-Ran BAI Meng HOU Yan-Jie LIU. Effects of the invasion of Cenchrus spinifex and drought on productivity of Leymus chinensis community [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(5): 577-589. |
[4] | RU Ya-Qian, XUE Jian-Guo, GE Ping, LI Yu-Lin, LI Dong-Xu, HAN Peng, YANG Tian-Run, CHU Wei, CHEN Zhang, ZHANG Xiao-Lin, LI Ang, HUANG Jian-Hui. Ecological and economic effects of intensive rotational grazing in a typical steppe [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(2): 171-179. |
[5] | WU Han, BAI Jie, LI Jun-Li, Guli JIAPAER, BAO An-Ming. Study of spatio-temporal variation in fractional vegetation cover and its influencing factors in Xinjiang, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(1): 41-55. |
[6] | LI Na, TANG Shi-Ming, GUO Jian-Ying, TIAN Ru, WANG Shan, HU Bing, LUO Yong-Hong, XU Zhu-Wen. Meta-analysis of effects of grazing on plant community properties in Nei Mongol grassland [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(9): 1256-1269. |
[7] | CHEN Ying-Jie, FANG Kai, QIN Shu-Qi, GUO Yan-Jun, YANG Yuan-He. Spatial patterns and determinants of soil organic carbon component contents and decomposition rate in temperate grasslands of Nei Mongol, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(9): 1245-1255. |
[8] | ZHAO Yan-Chao, CHEN Li-Tong. Soil nutrients modulate response of aboveground biomass to warming in alpine grassland on the Qingzang Plateau [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(8): 1071-1081. |
[9] | ZHANG Qi, FENG Ke, CHANG Zhi-Hui, HE Shuang-Hui, XU Wei-Qi. Effects of shrub encroachment on plant and soil microbial in the forest-grassland ecotone [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(6): 770-781. |
[10] | MIAO Li-Juan, ZHANG Yu-Yang, CHUAI Xiao-Wei, BAO Gang, HE Yu, ZHU Jing-Wen. Effects of climatic factors and their time-lag on grassland NDVI in Asian drylands [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(10): 1375-1385. |
[11] | WANG De-Li, LIANG Cun-Zhu. Restoration state of degraded grasslands: climate climax or disturbance climax? [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(10): 1464-1470. |
[12] | LIN Ma-Zhen, HUANG Yong, LI Yang, SUN Jian. Geographical distribution characteristics and influencing factors of plant survival strategies in an alpine grassland [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(1): 41-50. |
[13] | YANG Yuan-He, ZHANG Dian-Ye, WEI Bin, LIU Yang, FENG Xue-Hui, MAO Chao, XU Wei-Jie, HE Mei, WANG Lu, ZHENG Zhi-Hu, WANG Yuan-Yuan, CHEN Lei-Yi, PENG Yun-Feng. Nonlinear responses of community diversity, carbon and nitrogen cycles of grassland ecosystems to external nitrogen input [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(1): 1-24. |
[14] | DONG Quan-Min, ZHAO Xin-Quan, LIU Yu-Zhen, FENG Bin, YU Yang, YANG Xiao-Xia, ZHANG Chun-Ping, CAO Quan, LIU Wen-Ting. Effects of different herbivore assemblage on relationship between Kobresia humilis seed size and seed number in an alpine grassland [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(9): 1018-1026. |
[15] | DONG Liu-Wen, REN Zheng-Wei, ZHANG Rui, XIE Chen-Di, ZHOU Xiao-Long. Functional diversity rather than species diversity can explain community biomass variation following short-term nitrogen addition in an alpine grassland [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(8): 871-881. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn