Chin J Plan Ecolo ›› 2014, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 188-200.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00017

• Research Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Mechanisms underlying the impacts of grazing on plant α, β and γ diversity in a typical steppe of the Inner Mongolia grassland

YANG Jing1,2, CHU Peng-Fei2, CHEN Di-Ma2, WANG Ming-Jiu1*, and BAI Yong-Fei2   

  1. 1College of Ecology and Environmental Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Huhhot, 010018, China;

    2State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China
  • Received:2013-09-25 Revised:2014-01-24 Online:2014-02-12 Published:2014-02-01
  • Contact: WANG Ming-Jiu E-mail:wangmj_0540@163.com

Abstract:

Aims Human disturbance, such as overgrazing have resulted in widespread declines in biodiversity and ecosystem functioning and services in arid and semiarid grasslands worldwide. This study is aimed to examine the effects of grazing intensity, topography and precipitation fluctuation on plant diversity across three levels of organization (i.e., plant species, functional group, and community) in a typical steppe of the Inner Mongolia grassland.
Methods Based on a long-term grazing experiment maintained for eight years with seven levels of grazing intensity and two topographic systems in a typical steppe of the Inner Mongolia grassland, the effects of grazing intensity, topography (flat vs. slope), and precipitation fluctuations (wet vs. normal years) on plant diversity (i.e. α, β and γ diversity) and their controlling mechanisms were examined.
Important findings Our results showed that: (1) The diversity-grazing intensity relationship differed between two topographic systems and over two years (wet vs. normal years). The α, β, and γ diversity in the wet year (2012) were higher than those in the normal year (2011). The effect of topography on plant diversity was dependent on precipitation, with higher α diversity in the slope system and normal year and higher α and γ diversity in the flat system and wet year. There was no significant effect of topography on β diversity. (2) The α diversity decreased with increasing grazing intensity in both the flat and slope systems. The α diversity response to grazing differed substantially among the dominant species, common species, and rare species in the two topographic systems, with the highest negative response for rare species, intermediate negative response for common species, and the weakest response for dominant species. (3) In the flat system, γ diversity declined with increasing grazing intensity, while it firstly decreased and then increased at the intermediate level of grazing intensity in the slope system. (4) The β diversity decreased with increasing grazing intensity in the flat system due to grazing-induced species convergence, while it did not show any tendency in the slope system. Our results suggest that the topography and precipitation are two key factors governing the relationship between plant biodiversity and grazing intensity in the arid and semiarid grasslands. The loss of species in the dry year was greater in the flat system than in the slope system, while the opposite result was found in the wet year. The rare species plays an important role in maintaining species diversity. These findings provide a better understanding of the biodiversity-grazing intensity relationship in the context of different precipitation and topographic conditions in the semiarid steppe and beyond.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Lu Zhong-shu. Plant Growth Regutators in Relation to Plant Water Status[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1985, 3(04): 1 -6 .
[2] Li Da Jue;Han Yun-zhou and Wan Li-ping. Studies on Germplasm Collections of Carthamus tinctorius IV Screening of the characterization of Seed Domancy[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1990, 7(02): 50 -52 .
[3] . [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1999, 16(增刊): 45 -46 .
[4] LU Jin-Yao;LUO Ai-Ling and LIANG Zheng. Some Improvement of TD-PAGE Technology[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1998, 15(03): 69 -72 .
[5] LI Ling-Hao and CHEN Zuo-Zhong. The Global Carbon Cycle in Grassland Ecosystems and Its Responses to Global Change I . Carbon Flow Compartment Model, Inputs and Storage[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1998, 15(02): 14 -22 .
[6] Huanhuan Xu, Jian Kang, Mingxiang Liang. Research Advances in the Metabolism of Fructan in Plant Stress Resistance[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2014, 49(2): 209 -220 .
[7] . [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2013, 48(1): 4 -5 .
[8] . [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1996, 13(专辑): 45 .
[9] SHU Qun-Fang;ZHOU Lu;LI Wen-Bin;ZHANG LI-Ming and SUN Yong-Ru. Study on Gel Electrophoresis of Protein from Plant and Our Improved Methods[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1998, 15(06): 73 -78 .
[10] ZHANG Zhi-Dong, ZANG Run-Guo. PREDICTING POTENTIAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF DOMINANT WOODY PLANT KEYSTONE SPECIES IN A NATURAL TROPICAL FOREST LANDSCAPE OF BAWANGLING, HAINAN ISLAND, SOUTH CHINA[J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2007, 31(6): 1079 -1091 .