Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2014, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (7): 729-739.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00068
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Guang-Hui, WAN Yong-Shan*(), LIU Feng-Zhen, ZHANG Kun
Received:
2013-11-06
Accepted:
2014-03-10
Online:
2014-11-06
Published:
2014-07-10
Contact:
WAN Yong-Shan
LI Guang-Hui, WAN Yong-Shan, LIU Feng-Zhen, ZHANG Kun. Photosynthetic characteristics in different peanut cultivars under conditions of drought and re-watering at seedling stage[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2014, 38(7): 729-739.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00068
品种 Cultivar | 编号 Number | 类型 Type | 品种 Cultivar | 编号 Number | 类型 Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘79266’ | 1 | 中间型 Intermediate | ‘花育20’ ‘Huayu 20’ | 7 | 珍珠豆型 Vulgaris |
‘A596’ | 2 | 龙生型 Hirsuta | ‘农大818’ ‘Nongda 818’ | 8 | 普通型 Hypogaea |
‘ICG6848’ | 3 | 多粒型 Fastigiata | ‘蓬莱一窝猴’ ‘Penglaiyiwohou’ | 9 | 普通型 Hypogaea |
‘白沙1016’ ‘Baisha 1016’ | 4 | 珍珠豆型 Vulgaris | ‘如皋西洋生’ ‘Rugaoxiyangsheng’ | 10 | 龙生型 Hirsuta |
‘海花1号’ ‘Haihua 1’ | 5 | 中间型 Intermediate | ‘山花11号’ ‘Shanhua 11’ | 11 | 中间型 Intermediate |
‘花17’ ‘Hua 17’ | 6 | 普通型 Hypogaea | ‘山花9号’ ‘Shanhua 9’ | 12 | 中间型 Intermediate |
Table 1 Test cultivars of Arachis hypogaea and theirs botanical types
品种 Cultivar | 编号 Number | 类型 Type | 品种 Cultivar | 编号 Number | 类型 Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘79266’ | 1 | 中间型 Intermediate | ‘花育20’ ‘Huayu 20’ | 7 | 珍珠豆型 Vulgaris |
‘A596’ | 2 | 龙生型 Hirsuta | ‘农大818’ ‘Nongda 818’ | 8 | 普通型 Hypogaea |
‘ICG6848’ | 3 | 多粒型 Fastigiata | ‘蓬莱一窝猴’ ‘Penglaiyiwohou’ | 9 | 普通型 Hypogaea |
‘白沙1016’ ‘Baisha 1016’ | 4 | 珍珠豆型 Vulgaris | ‘如皋西洋生’ ‘Rugaoxiyangsheng’ | 10 | 龙生型 Hirsuta |
‘海花1号’ ‘Haihua 1’ | 5 | 中间型 Intermediate | ‘山花11号’ ‘Shanhua 11’ | 11 | 中间型 Intermediate |
‘花17’ ‘Hua 17’ | 6 | 普通型 Hypogaea | ‘山花9号’ ‘Shanhua 9’ | 12 | 中间型 Intermediate |
品种编号 Cultivar No. | 出苗至始花干物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation from emergence to anthesis (g·plant-1) | 复水1-5天干物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation from 1 to 5 days after re-watering (g·plant-1) | 复水1-10天干物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation from 1 to 10 days after re-watering (g·plant-1) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照 Control | 干旱胁迫 Drought stress | 抗旱系数 Drought resistance coefficient | 对照 Control | 干旱胁迫 Drought stress | 比值 Ratio | 对照 Control | 干旱胁迫 Drought stress | 比值 Ratio | |||
1 | 3.59d | 2.25d | 0.63 | 1.37d | 1.16c | 0.85 | 2.94d | 2.67e | 0.91 | ||
2 | 4.28b | 3.16abc | 0.74 | 1.66abc | 1.73ab | 1.04 | 3.58abc | 3.81bc | 1.06 | ||
3 | 4.13bc | 2.07d | 0.50 | 1.70abc | 1.38bc | 0.81 | 3.78ab | 3.45cd | 0.91 | ||
4 | 3.49d | 1.87d | 0.53 | 1.30d | 1.11c | 0.85 | 2.87d | 2.82e | 0.98 | ||
5 | 4.23bc | 2.83bc | 0.67 | 1.50cd | 1.43bc | 0.95 | 3.15cd | 3.29d | 1.04 | ||
6 | 5.15a | 3.21ab | 0.62 | 1.67abc | 1.45bc | 0.87 | 3.44bc | 3.21d | 0.93 | ||
7 | 4.96a | 3.27a | 0.66 | 1.80ab | 1.65ab | 0.92 | 3.89ab | 3.80bc | 0.98 | ||
8 | 4.11bc | 2.80c | 0.68 | 1.47cd | 1.53abc | 1.04 | 2.97d | 3.30d | 1.11 | ||
9 | 3.63d | 2.01d | 0.55 | 1.79ab | 1.74ab | 0.97 | 3.72ab | 3.77bc | 1.01 | ||
10 | 3.83cd | 2.91abc | 0.76 | 1.84a | 1.99a | 1.08 | 3.86ab | 4.25a | 1.10 | ||
11 | 4.14bc | 3.29a | 0.79 | 1.54bcd | 1.64ab | 1.06 | 3.24cd | 3.54cd | 1.09 | ||
12 | 4.25bc | 2.96abc | 0.70 | 1.91a | 1.95a | 1.02 | 3.96a | 4.11ab | 1.04 | ||
与抗旱系数的相关性 Correlation with drought resistance coefficient | 0.21 | 0.59* | 0.83** | 0.10 | 0.47 | 0.73** |
Table 2 Dry matter and drought resistance of cultivars of Arachis hypogaea under drought stress and re-watering at seedling stage
品种编号 Cultivar No. | 出苗至始花干物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation from emergence to anthesis (g·plant-1) | 复水1-5天干物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation from 1 to 5 days after re-watering (g·plant-1) | 复水1-10天干物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation from 1 to 10 days after re-watering (g·plant-1) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照 Control | 干旱胁迫 Drought stress | 抗旱系数 Drought resistance coefficient | 对照 Control | 干旱胁迫 Drought stress | 比值 Ratio | 对照 Control | 干旱胁迫 Drought stress | 比值 Ratio | |||
1 | 3.59d | 2.25d | 0.63 | 1.37d | 1.16c | 0.85 | 2.94d | 2.67e | 0.91 | ||
2 | 4.28b | 3.16abc | 0.74 | 1.66abc | 1.73ab | 1.04 | 3.58abc | 3.81bc | 1.06 | ||
3 | 4.13bc | 2.07d | 0.50 | 1.70abc | 1.38bc | 0.81 | 3.78ab | 3.45cd | 0.91 | ||
4 | 3.49d | 1.87d | 0.53 | 1.30d | 1.11c | 0.85 | 2.87d | 2.82e | 0.98 | ||
5 | 4.23bc | 2.83bc | 0.67 | 1.50cd | 1.43bc | 0.95 | 3.15cd | 3.29d | 1.04 | ||
6 | 5.15a | 3.21ab | 0.62 | 1.67abc | 1.45bc | 0.87 | 3.44bc | 3.21d | 0.93 | ||
7 | 4.96a | 3.27a | 0.66 | 1.80ab | 1.65ab | 0.92 | 3.89ab | 3.80bc | 0.98 | ||
8 | 4.11bc | 2.80c | 0.68 | 1.47cd | 1.53abc | 1.04 | 2.97d | 3.30d | 1.11 | ||
9 | 3.63d | 2.01d | 0.55 | 1.79ab | 1.74ab | 0.97 | 3.72ab | 3.77bc | 1.01 | ||
10 | 3.83cd | 2.91abc | 0.76 | 1.84a | 1.99a | 1.08 | 3.86ab | 4.25a | 1.10 | ||
11 | 4.14bc | 3.29a | 0.79 | 1.54bcd | 1.64ab | 1.06 | 3.24cd | 3.54cd | 1.09 | ||
12 | 4.25bc | 2.96abc | 0.70 | 1.91a | 1.95a | 1.02 | 3.96a | 4.11ab | 1.04 | ||
与抗旱系数的相关性 Correlation with drought resistance coefficient | 0.21 | 0.59* | 0.83** | 0.10 | 0.47 | 0.73** |
Fig. 1 Changes in gas exchange parameters under drought stress and following re-watering at the seedling stage across different peanut cultivars (mean ± SE). A, 7 days of drought stress. B, 14 days of drought stress. C, 5 days after re-watering. D, 10 days after re-watering. The numbers of cultivars see Table 1. Ci, intercellular CO2 concentration; Gs, stomatal conductance; Pn, net photosynthetic rate.
干旱天数 Days of drought (d) | 品种编号 Cultivar No. | 光系统II实际光化学效率 ΦPSII | 光系统II最大光化学效率 Fv/Fm | 光化学猝灭系数 qP | 非光化学猝灭系数 NPQ | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照 Control | 干旱 Drought | 对照 Control | 干旱 Drought | 对照 Control | 干旱 Drought | 对照 Control | 干旱 Drought | |||||
7 | 1 | 0.383ab | 0.348bcd | 0.807a | 0.719def | 0.579ef | 0.429c | 1.615abc | 2.328bc | |||
2 | 0.434a | 0.406a | 0.835a | 0.796ab | 0.683ab | 0.613a | 1.350bcd | 1.467de | ||||
3 | 0.407a | 0.326cde | 0.821a | 0.758bcde | 0.628cd | 0.403c | 1.810ab | 1.903cd | ||||
4 | 0.339a | 0.291e | 0.817a | 0.702f | 0.579ef | 0.451c | 1.363bcd | 2.501ab | ||||
5 | 0.436a | 0.350abcd | 0.830a | 0.773abc | 0.665abc | 0.539b | 1.046d | 1.644de | ||||
6 | 0.413a | 0.311de | 0.825a | 0.727cdef | 0.540f | 0.551b | 1.18cd | 2.911a | ||||
7 | 0.381b | 0.318de | 0.818a | 0.711ef | 0.589de | 0.433c | 1.306cd | 2.030bcd | ||||
8 | 0.384a | 0.356abcd | 0.825a | 0.767abcd | 0.646abc | 0.542b | 1.949a | 1.682de | ||||
9 | 0.423a | 0.381abc | 0.839a | 0.757bcde | 0.690a | 0.572ab | 1.845ab | 1.985bcd | ||||
10 | 0.424ab | 0.392ab | 0.848a | 0.813a | 0.675abc | 0.619a | 0.996d | 1.183e | ||||
11 | 0.432ab | 0.383ab | 0.834a | 0.778abc | 0.666abc | 0.576ab | 0.938d | 1.214e | ||||
12 | 0.417a | 0.353abcd | 0.828a | 0.754bcde | 0.637bc | 0.538b | 1.918a | 1.817cd | ||||
14 | 1 | 0.410abc | 0.321de | 0.816a | 0.673d | 0.597c | 0.446d | 1.502a | 2.642ab | |||
2 | 0.474a | 0.404a | 0.852a | 0.789a | 0.749a | 0.620ab | 1.264a | 1.691c | ||||
3 | 0.439abc | 0.268fg | 0.838a | 0.682cd | 0.646c | 0.407d | 1.657a | 3.022a | ||||
4 | 0.392c | 0.244g | 0.823a | 0.622e | 0.662bc | 0.434d | 1.203a | 3.171a | ||||
5 | 0.468a | 0.343cde | 0.847a | 0.751ab | 0.716ab | 0.538c | 1.547a | 2.903a | ||||
6 | 0.416abc | 0.280fg | 0.833a | 0.678cd | 0.649c | 0.450d | 1.465a | 3.178a | ||||
7 | 0.403bc | 0.304ef | 0.827a | 0.688cd | 0.638c | 0.445d | 1.289a | 2.837ab | ||||
8 | 0.445abc | 0.343cde | 0.839a | 0.727bc | 0.723ab | 0.553bc | 1.672a | 2.745ab | ||||
9 | 0.455abc | 0.360bcd | 0.846a | 0.742ab | 0.743a | 0.526c | 1.670a | 2.250bc | ||||
10 | 0.469a | 0.387ab | 0.868a | 0.795a | 0.763a | 0.628a | 1.145a | 1.691c | ||||
11 | 0.461ab | 0.373abc | 0.850a | 0.765ab | 0.740a | 0.589abc | 1.178a | 1.882c | ||||
12 | 0.448abc | 0.339cde | 0.845a | 0.727bc | 0.724ab | 0.522c | 1.623a | 2.971a |
Table 3 Fluorescence parameters of cultivars of Arachis hypogaea under drought stress at seedling stage
干旱天数 Days of drought (d) | 品种编号 Cultivar No. | 光系统II实际光化学效率 ΦPSII | 光系统II最大光化学效率 Fv/Fm | 光化学猝灭系数 qP | 非光化学猝灭系数 NPQ | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照 Control | 干旱 Drought | 对照 Control | 干旱 Drought | 对照 Control | 干旱 Drought | 对照 Control | 干旱 Drought | |||||
7 | 1 | 0.383ab | 0.348bcd | 0.807a | 0.719def | 0.579ef | 0.429c | 1.615abc | 2.328bc | |||
2 | 0.434a | 0.406a | 0.835a | 0.796ab | 0.683ab | 0.613a | 1.350bcd | 1.467de | ||||
3 | 0.407a | 0.326cde | 0.821a | 0.758bcde | 0.628cd | 0.403c | 1.810ab | 1.903cd | ||||
4 | 0.339a | 0.291e | 0.817a | 0.702f | 0.579ef | 0.451c | 1.363bcd | 2.501ab | ||||
5 | 0.436a | 0.350abcd | 0.830a | 0.773abc | 0.665abc | 0.539b | 1.046d | 1.644de | ||||
6 | 0.413a | 0.311de | 0.825a | 0.727cdef | 0.540f | 0.551b | 1.18cd | 2.911a | ||||
7 | 0.381b | 0.318de | 0.818a | 0.711ef | 0.589de | 0.433c | 1.306cd | 2.030bcd | ||||
8 | 0.384a | 0.356abcd | 0.825a | 0.767abcd | 0.646abc | 0.542b | 1.949a | 1.682de | ||||
9 | 0.423a | 0.381abc | 0.839a | 0.757bcde | 0.690a | 0.572ab | 1.845ab | 1.985bcd | ||||
10 | 0.424ab | 0.392ab | 0.848a | 0.813a | 0.675abc | 0.619a | 0.996d | 1.183e | ||||
11 | 0.432ab | 0.383ab | 0.834a | 0.778abc | 0.666abc | 0.576ab | 0.938d | 1.214e | ||||
12 | 0.417a | 0.353abcd | 0.828a | 0.754bcde | 0.637bc | 0.538b | 1.918a | 1.817cd | ||||
14 | 1 | 0.410abc | 0.321de | 0.816a | 0.673d | 0.597c | 0.446d | 1.502a | 2.642ab | |||
2 | 0.474a | 0.404a | 0.852a | 0.789a | 0.749a | 0.620ab | 1.264a | 1.691c | ||||
3 | 0.439abc | 0.268fg | 0.838a | 0.682cd | 0.646c | 0.407d | 1.657a | 3.022a | ||||
4 | 0.392c | 0.244g | 0.823a | 0.622e | 0.662bc | 0.434d | 1.203a | 3.171a | ||||
5 | 0.468a | 0.343cde | 0.847a | 0.751ab | 0.716ab | 0.538c | 1.547a | 2.903a | ||||
6 | 0.416abc | 0.280fg | 0.833a | 0.678cd | 0.649c | 0.450d | 1.465a | 3.178a | ||||
7 | 0.403bc | 0.304ef | 0.827a | 0.688cd | 0.638c | 0.445d | 1.289a | 2.837ab | ||||
8 | 0.445abc | 0.343cde | 0.839a | 0.727bc | 0.723ab | 0.553bc | 1.672a | 2.745ab | ||||
9 | 0.455abc | 0.360bcd | 0.846a | 0.742ab | 0.743a | 0.526c | 1.670a | 2.250bc | ||||
10 | 0.469a | 0.387ab | 0.868a | 0.795a | 0.763a | 0.628a | 1.145a | 1.691c | ||||
11 | 0.461ab | 0.373abc | 0.850a | 0.765ab | 0.740a | 0.589abc | 1.178a | 1.882c | ||||
12 | 0.448abc | 0.339cde | 0.845a | 0.727bc | 0.724ab | 0.522c | 1.623a | 2.971a |
复水天数 Days after re- watering (d) | 品种编号 Cultivar No. | 光系统II实际光化学效率 ΦPSII | 光系统II最大光化学效率 Fv/Fm | 光化学猝灭系数 qP | 非光化学猝灭系数 NPQ | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照 Control | 干旱 Drought | 对照 Control | 干旱 Drought | 对照 Control | 干旱 Drought | 对照 Control | 干旱 Drought | |||||
5 | 1 | 0.425cd | 0.373f | 0.822a | 0.743efg | 0.749bc | 0.638d | 1.646a | 1.961a | |||
2 | 0.489ab | 0.497ab | 0.857a | 0.842abc | 0.863a | 0.875a | 1.422a | 1.380b | ||||
3 | 0.434bcd | 0.356f | 0.835a | 0.705g | 0.701c | 0.583d | 1.595a | 1.657ab | ||||
4 | 0.411d | 0.393def | 0.819a | 0.753efg | 0.736bc | 0.647cd | 1.639a | 1.453b | ||||
5 | 0.476abc | 0.439cde | 0.824a | 0.808bcd | 0.849a | 0.805ab | 1.435a | 1.336b | ||||
6 | 0.433bcd | 0.386ef | 0.828a | 0.735fg | 0.725bc | 0.630d | 1.572a | 1.663ab | ||||
7 | 0.422cd | 0.446bcd | 0.822a | 0.781def | 0.845a | 0.780ab | 1.532a | 1.547ab | ||||
8 | 0.468abcd | 0.462bc | 0.838a | 0.793cde | 0.806ab | 0.827ab | 1.660a | 1.441b | ||||
9 | 0.476abc | 0.398def | 0.835a | 0.755efg | 0.720bc | 0.654cd | 1.461a | 1.468b | ||||
10 | 0.506a | 0.526a | 0.861a | 0.873a | 0.853a | 0.868a | 1.317a | 1.317b | ||||
11 | 0.488ab | 0.497ab | 0.852a | 0.819bcd | 0.854a | 0.832ab | 1.497a | 1.350b | ||||
12 | 0.463abcd | 0.456bc | 0.849a | 0.856ab | 0.784abc | 0.740bc | 1.534a | 1.428b | ||||
10 | 1 | 0.464c | 0.447e | 0.823a | 0.852ab | 0.782c | 0.865a | 1.568ab | 1.488a | |||
2 | 0.525ab | 0.587ab | 0.862a | 0.887a | 0.879ab | 0.912a | 1.294bc | 0.988cd | ||||
3 | 0.468bc | 0.438e | 0.863a | 0.791c | 0.815bc | 0.772bc | 1.555ab | 1.465a | ||||
4 | 0.456c | 0.421e | 0.824a | 0.787c | 0.802bc | 0.734c | 1.728a | 1.424a | ||||
5 | 0.505abc | 0.511cd | 0.831a | 0.843b | 0.876ab | 0.905a | 1.376bc | 1.296abcd | ||||
6 | 0.488abc | 0.465de | 0.835a | 0.797c | 0.807bc | 0.739c | 1.471abc | 1.434a | ||||
7 | 0.493abc | 0.523c | 0.837a | 0.841b | 0.815bc | 0.833ab | 1.313bc | 1.329abc | ||||
8 | 0.492abc | 0.537bc | 0.845a | 0.879ab | 0.833abc | 0.904a | 1.433abc | 1.347ab | ||||
9 | 0.538a | 0.532c | 0.851a | 0.873ab | 0.865abc | 0.906a | 1.238c | 1.261abcd | ||||
10 | 0.539a | 0.608a | 0.869a | 0.882a | 0.908a | 0.915a | 1.308bc | 1.215abcd | ||||
11 | 0.507abc | 0.553bc | 0.859a | 0.855ab | 0.878ab | 0.907a | 1.222c | 0.951d | ||||
12 | 0.527a | 0.541bc | 0.848a | 0.887a | 0.855abc | 0.898a | 1.456abc | 1.023bcd |
Table 4 Fluorescence parameters of cultivars of Arachis hypogaea under re-watering after drought stress
复水天数 Days after re- watering (d) | 品种编号 Cultivar No. | 光系统II实际光化学效率 ΦPSII | 光系统II最大光化学效率 Fv/Fm | 光化学猝灭系数 qP | 非光化学猝灭系数 NPQ | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照 Control | 干旱 Drought | 对照 Control | 干旱 Drought | 对照 Control | 干旱 Drought | 对照 Control | 干旱 Drought | |||||
5 | 1 | 0.425cd | 0.373f | 0.822a | 0.743efg | 0.749bc | 0.638d | 1.646a | 1.961a | |||
2 | 0.489ab | 0.497ab | 0.857a | 0.842abc | 0.863a | 0.875a | 1.422a | 1.380b | ||||
3 | 0.434bcd | 0.356f | 0.835a | 0.705g | 0.701c | 0.583d | 1.595a | 1.657ab | ||||
4 | 0.411d | 0.393def | 0.819a | 0.753efg | 0.736bc | 0.647cd | 1.639a | 1.453b | ||||
5 | 0.476abc | 0.439cde | 0.824a | 0.808bcd | 0.849a | 0.805ab | 1.435a | 1.336b | ||||
6 | 0.433bcd | 0.386ef | 0.828a | 0.735fg | 0.725bc | 0.630d | 1.572a | 1.663ab | ||||
7 | 0.422cd | 0.446bcd | 0.822a | 0.781def | 0.845a | 0.780ab | 1.532a | 1.547ab | ||||
8 | 0.468abcd | 0.462bc | 0.838a | 0.793cde | 0.806ab | 0.827ab | 1.660a | 1.441b | ||||
9 | 0.476abc | 0.398def | 0.835a | 0.755efg | 0.720bc | 0.654cd | 1.461a | 1.468b | ||||
10 | 0.506a | 0.526a | 0.861a | 0.873a | 0.853a | 0.868a | 1.317a | 1.317b | ||||
11 | 0.488ab | 0.497ab | 0.852a | 0.819bcd | 0.854a | 0.832ab | 1.497a | 1.350b | ||||
12 | 0.463abcd | 0.456bc | 0.849a | 0.856ab | 0.784abc | 0.740bc | 1.534a | 1.428b | ||||
10 | 1 | 0.464c | 0.447e | 0.823a | 0.852ab | 0.782c | 0.865a | 1.568ab | 1.488a | |||
2 | 0.525ab | 0.587ab | 0.862a | 0.887a | 0.879ab | 0.912a | 1.294bc | 0.988cd | ||||
3 | 0.468bc | 0.438e | 0.863a | 0.791c | 0.815bc | 0.772bc | 1.555ab | 1.465a | ||||
4 | 0.456c | 0.421e | 0.824a | 0.787c | 0.802bc | 0.734c | 1.728a | 1.424a | ||||
5 | 0.505abc | 0.511cd | 0.831a | 0.843b | 0.876ab | 0.905a | 1.376bc | 1.296abcd | ||||
6 | 0.488abc | 0.465de | 0.835a | 0.797c | 0.807bc | 0.739c | 1.471abc | 1.434a | ||||
7 | 0.493abc | 0.523c | 0.837a | 0.841b | 0.815bc | 0.833ab | 1.313bc | 1.329abc | ||||
8 | 0.492abc | 0.537bc | 0.845a | 0.879ab | 0.833abc | 0.904a | 1.433abc | 1.347ab | ||||
9 | 0.538a | 0.532c | 0.851a | 0.873ab | 0.865abc | 0.906a | 1.238c | 1.261abcd | ||||
10 | 0.539a | 0.608a | 0.869a | 0.882a | 0.908a | 0.915a | 1.308bc | 1.215abcd | ||||
11 | 0.507abc | 0.553bc | 0.859a | 0.855ab | 0.878ab | 0.907a | 1.222c | 0.951d | ||||
12 | 0.527a | 0.541bc | 0.848a | 0.887a | 0.855abc | 0.898a | 1.456abc | 1.023bcd |
出苗后天数 Days since emergence (d) | 处理 Treatments | 净光合速率Pn | 气孔导度 Gs | 胞间CO2 浓度 Ci | 光系统II实际 光化学效率 ΦPSII | 光系统II最大 光化学效率 Fv/Fm | 光化学猝灭 系数 qP | 非光化学猝灭 系数 NPQ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
17 | 对照 Control | 0.139 8 | -0.102 6 | 0.614 9* | 0.504 0 | 0.481 0 | 0.404 6 | -0.481 2 |
干旱 Drought | 0.684 0* | 0.568 9 | 0.647 8* | 0.649 8* | 0.663 7* | 0.663 7* | -0.676 6* | |
24 | 对照 Control | 0.402 8 | -0.738 4** | -0.109 6 | 0.552 5 | 0.573 7 | 0.559 8 | -0.468 7 |
干旱 Drought | 0.782 7** | 0.528 5 | 0.253 5 | 0.775 0** | 0.743 9** | 0.807 9** | -0.650 7* | |
29 | 对照 Control | 0.047 2 | -0.737 4** | 0.495 6 | 0.692 2* | 0.673 1* | 0.871 8** | -0.523 5 |
复水 Re-watering | 0.813 5** | 0.885 3** | 0.705 1* | 0.902 7** | 0.851 8** | 0.878 0** | -0.479 2 | |
34 | 对照 Control | 0.013 1 | -0.624 3* | 0.444 2 | 0.559 9 | 0.372 6 | 0.640 4* | -0.773 0** |
复水 Re-watering | 0.767 3** | 0.535 3 | 0.906 6** | 0.806 8** | 0.681 8* | 0.685 6* | -0.743 7** |
Table 5 Correlation analysis of photosynthetic characteristics with drought tolerance of cultivars of Arachis hypogaea at seedling stage
出苗后天数 Days since emergence (d) | 处理 Treatments | 净光合速率Pn | 气孔导度 Gs | 胞间CO2 浓度 Ci | 光系统II实际 光化学效率 ΦPSII | 光系统II最大 光化学效率 Fv/Fm | 光化学猝灭 系数 qP | 非光化学猝灭 系数 NPQ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
17 | 对照 Control | 0.139 8 | -0.102 6 | 0.614 9* | 0.504 0 | 0.481 0 | 0.404 6 | -0.481 2 |
干旱 Drought | 0.684 0* | 0.568 9 | 0.647 8* | 0.649 8* | 0.663 7* | 0.663 7* | -0.676 6* | |
24 | 对照 Control | 0.402 8 | -0.738 4** | -0.109 6 | 0.552 5 | 0.573 7 | 0.559 8 | -0.468 7 |
干旱 Drought | 0.782 7** | 0.528 5 | 0.253 5 | 0.775 0** | 0.743 9** | 0.807 9** | -0.650 7* | |
29 | 对照 Control | 0.047 2 | -0.737 4** | 0.495 6 | 0.692 2* | 0.673 1* | 0.871 8** | -0.523 5 |
复水 Re-watering | 0.813 5** | 0.885 3** | 0.705 1* | 0.902 7** | 0.851 8** | 0.878 0** | -0.479 2 | |
34 | 对照 Control | 0.013 1 | -0.624 3* | 0.444 2 | 0.559 9 | 0.372 6 | 0.640 4* | -0.773 0** |
复水 Re-watering | 0.767 3** | 0.535 3 | 0.906 6** | 0.806 8** | 0.681 8* | 0.685 6* | -0.743 7** |
[1] | Chapman SC, Ludlow MM, Blamey FPC, Fischer KS (1993). Effect of drought during early reproductive development on growth of cultivars of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). II. Biomass production, pod development and yield. Field Crops Research, 32, 211-225. |
[2] |
Chaves MM, Oliveira MM (2004). Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55, 2365-2384.
URL PMID |
[3] | Clavel D, Diouf O, Khalfaoui JL, Braconnier S (2006). Genotypes variations in fluorescence parameters among closely related groundnut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) lines and their potential for drought screening programs. Field Crops Research, 96, 296-306. |
[4] | Farquhar GD, Sharkey TD (1982). Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 33, 317-345. |
[5] | Flexas J, Escalona JM, Medrano H (1998). Down-regulation of photosynthesis by drought under field conditions in grapevine leaves. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 25, 893-900. |
[6] | Gai JY, Wang YS, Zhang MC, Wang JA, Chang RZ (2001). Studies on the classification of maturity groups of soybeans in China. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 27, 286-292. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[盖钧镒, 汪越胜, 张孟臣, 王继安, 常汝镇 (2001). 中国大豆品种熟期组划分的研究. 作物学报, 27, 286-292.] | |
[7] | Guan YX, Dai JY, Xu SC, Huang CX (1997). Effects of soil drought during flowering and rewatering on plant compensative growth and yield of maize. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 23, 740-745. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[关义新, 戴俊英, 徐世昌, 黄成星 (1997). 玉米花期干旱及复水对植株补偿生长及产量的影响. 作物学报, 23, 740-745.] | |
[8] | He WM, Ma FY (2000). Effects of water gradient on fluorescence characteristics and gas exchange in Sabina vulgaris seedlings. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 24, 630-634. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[何维明, 马风云 (2000). 水分梯度对沙地柏幼苗荧光特征和气体交换的影响. 植物生态学报, 24, 630-634.] | |
[9] | Jiang HF, Ren XP (2004). The effect on SOD activity and protein content in groundnut leaves by drought stress. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 30, 169-174. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[姜慧芳, 任小平 (2004). 干旱胁迫对花生叶片SOD活性和蛋白质的影响. 作物学报, 30, 169-174.] | |
[10] | Lauriano JA, Ramalho JC, Lidon FC, do Céu Matos M (2004). Peanut photosynthesis under drought and re-watering. Photosynthetica, 42, 37-41. |
[11] | Li WJ (1997). Effect of soil drought and rewatering on physiological characteristics of peanut. Journal of Shandong Agricultural Science, (5), 15-18. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[李维江 (1997). 土壤干旱与复水对花生生理特性的影响. 山东农业科学, (5), 15-18.] | |
[12] | Li Y, Pan HC, Li DQ (2002). Physiological differences between desication-tolerent and desication-sensitive varieties of maize (Zea mays L.) during soil draught stress and rehydration. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture & Life Sciences), 28, 249-254. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[李岩, 潘海春, 李德全 (2002). 抗旱性不同的玉米品种在土壤干旱及复水过程中的生理差异. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 28, 249-254.] | |
[13] | Liu JL, Zhao CX, Wu N, Wang YF, Wang ML (2011). Effects of drought and rewatering at seedling stage on photosynthetic characteristics and water use efficiency of peanut. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 44, 469-476. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[刘吉利, 赵长星, 吴娜, 王月福, 王铭伦 (2011). 苗期干旱及复水对花生光合特性及水分利用效率的影响. 中国农业科学, 44, 469-476.] | |
[14] | Luo J, Zhang MQ, Lin YQ, Zhang H, Chen RK (2004). Studies on the relationship of chlorophyll fluorescence characters and drought tolerance in seedling of sugarcane under water stress. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 37, 1718-1721. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[罗俊, 张木清, 林彦铨, 张华, 陈如凯 (2004). 甘蔗苗期叶绿素荧光参数与抗旱性关系研究. 中国农业科学, 37, 1718-1721.] | |
[15] |
Massacci A, Nabiev SM, Pietrosanti L, Nematov SK, Chernikova TN, Thor K, Leipner J (2008). Response of the photosynthetic apparatus of cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum) to the onset of drought stress under field conditions studied by gas-exchange analysis and chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 46, 189-195.
URL PMID |
[16] | Meng ZQ, Song FP, Liu ZX, Zhang FK (2012). Effects of drought and rewatering at seedling stage on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics in rapeseed. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 34, 40-47. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[蒙祖庆, 宋丰萍, 刘振兴, 张方凯 (2012). 干旱及复水对油菜苗期光合及叶绿素荧光特性的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 34, 40-47.] | |
[17] | Nautiyal PC, Ravindra V, Joshi YC (1995). Gas exchange and leaf water relations in two peanut cultivars of different drought tolerance. Biologia Plantarum, 37, 371-374. |
[18] | Pimratch S, Jogloy S, Vorasoot N, Toomsan B, Patanothai A, Holbrook CC (2008). Relationship between biomass production and nitrogen fixation under drought-stress conditions in peanut genotypes with different levels of drought resistance. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 194, 15-25. |
[19] | Puangbut D, Jogloy S, Toomsan B, Vorasoot N, Akkasaeng C, Kesmala T, Rachaputi RCN, Wright GC, Patanothai A (2010). Physiological basis for genotypic variation in tolerance to and recovery from pre-flowering drought in peanut. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 196, 358-367. |
[20] | Rao RCN, Singh S, Sivakumar MVK, Srivastava KL, Williams JH (1985). Effect of water deficit at different growth phases of peanut. I. Yield responses. Journal of Agronomy, 77, 782-786. |
[21] | Singh SK, Reddy KR (2011). Regulation of photosynthesis, fluorescence, stomatal conductance and water-use efficiency of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) under drought. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 105, 40-50. |
[22] | Siopongco JDL, Yamauchi CA, Salekdeh H, Bennett J, Wade LJ (2006). Growth and water use response of doubled- haploid rice lines to drought and rewatering during the vegetative stage. Plant Production Science, 9, 141-151. |
[23] | Sun DR (1998). Peanut Breeding. China Agriculture Press, Beijing. 256-275. (in Chinese) |
[孙大容 (1998). 花生育种学. 中国农业出版社, 北京. 256-275.] | |
[24] | Wan YS, Zhang GY (1992). Effect of soil water on the net photosynthetic rate in peanut. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University, 23, 31-35. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[万勇善, 张高英 (1992). 土壤水分对花生净光合速率的影响. 山东农业大学学报, 23, 31-35.] | |
[25] | Wang L, Zhang T, Ding SY (2006). Effect of drought and rewatering on photosynthetic physioecological characteristics of soybean. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 26, 2073-2078. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[王磊, 张彤, 丁圣彦 (2006). 干旱和复水对大豆光合生理生态特性的影响. 生态学报, 26, 2073-2078.] | |
[26] | Wu GL, Duan RY, Wang ZG, Zhang ZX, Wu LF (2010). Effects of drought stress and rehydration on chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics in Fragaria × ananassa Duch. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30, 3941-3946. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[吴甘霖, 段仁燕, 王志高, 张中信, 吴礼凤 (2010). 干旱和复水对草莓叶片叶绿素荧光特性的影响. 生态学报, 30, 3941-3946.] | |
[27] | Yao JP, Luo YN, Yang XD (1984). A primary study on the critical moisture of early and middle peanut varieties during different growth periods. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, ( 3), 36-43. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[姚君平, 罗瑶年, 杨新道 (1984). 早、中熟花生不同生育阶段临界水分研究初报. 中国油料作物学报, (3), 36-43.] | |
[28] | Zhang RH, Ma GS, Chai H, Zhang XH, Lu HD, Xue JQ (2010). Effect of drought stress on chlorophyll fluorescence of maize leaves at seedling. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 28(6), 170-176. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[张仁和, 马国胜, 柴海, 张兴华, 路海东, 薛吉全 (2010). 干旱胁迫对玉米苗期叶绿素荧光参数的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 28(6), 170-176.] | |
[29] | Zhang RH, Xue JQ, Pu J, Zhao B, Zhang XH, Zheng YJ, Bu LD (2011). Influence of drought stress on plant growth and photosynthetic traits in maize seedlings. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 37, 521-528. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[张仁和, 薛吉全, 浦军, 赵兵, 张兴华, 郑友军, 卜令铎 (2011). 干旱胁迫对玉米苗期植株生长和光合特性的影响. 作物学报, 37, 521-528.] | |
[30] | Zhang ZM, Wan SB, Dai LX, Song WW, Chen J, Shi YQ (2011). Estimating and screening of drought resistance indexes of peanut. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 35, 100-109. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[张智猛, 万书波, 戴良香, 宋文武, 陈静, 石运庆 (2011). 花生抗旱性鉴定指标的筛选与评价. 植物生态学报, 35, 100-109.] |
[1] | Zheng Jiang Dingqin Liu Yuxuan Miao Lingyan Zhou Ying Feng Jianing Pei Ruiqiang Liu Xuhui Zhou Yu-Ling Fu. Effects of drought on plant root exudates and associated rhizosphere priming effect: review and prospect [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(预发表): 0-0. |
[2] | CHEN Tu-Qiang, XU Gui-Qing, LIU Shen-Si, LI Yan. Hydraulic traits adjustments and nonstructural carbohydrate dynamics of Haloxylon ammodendron under drought stress [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(10): 1407-1421. |
[3] | LI Bian-Bian, ZHANG Feng-Hua, ZHAO Ya-Guang, SUN Bing-Nan. Effects of different clipping degrees on non-structural carbohydrate metabolism and biomass of Cyperus esculentus [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(1): 101-113. |
[4] | ZHOU Jie, YANG Xiao-Dong, WANG Ya-Yun, LONG Yan-Xin, WANG Yan, LI Bo-Rui, SUN Qi-Xing, SUN Nan. Difference in adaptation strategy between Haloxylon ammodendron and Alhagi sparsifolia to drought [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(9): 1064-1076. |
[5] | ZHANG Xiao-Yan, WEE Kim Shan Alison, KAJITA Tadashi, CAO Kun-Fang. Effects of provenance on leaf structure and function of two mangrove species: the genetic adaptation to temperature [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2021, 45(11): 1241-1250. |
[6] | LIU Li-Yan, FENG Jin-Xia, LIU Wen-Xin, WAN Xian-Chong. Effects of drought stress on photosynthesis, growth and root structure of transgenic PtPIP2;8 poplar 84K (Populus alba × P. glandulosa) [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2020, 44(6): 677-686. |
[7] | LUO Jin-Huan, TAN Zhao-Yuan, CHEN Bin, CHEN Guang-Wu, JIANG Kai, HEI Qi-Fang, ZHANG Hui. Key characteristics for facilitating Leucaena leucocephala to successfully invade pioneer communities of tropical rain forests [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2020, 44(12): 1215-1223. |
[8] | XU Li-Jiao, HAO Zhi-Peng, XIE Wei, LI Fang, CHEN Bao-Dong. Transmembrane H + and Ca 2+ fluxes through extraradical hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in response to drought stress [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2018, 42(7): 764-773. |
[9] | CHENG Han-Ting, LI Qin-Fen, LIU Jing-Kun, YAN Ting-Liang, ZHANG Qiao-Yan, WANG Jin-Chuang. Seasonal changes of photosynthetic characteristics of Alpinia oxyphylla growing under Hevea brasiliensis [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2018, 42(5): 585-594. |
[10] | Xi WANG,Hong-Ling HU,Ting-Xing HU,Cheng-Hao ZHANG,Xin WANG,Dan LIU. Effects of drought stress on the osmotic adjustment and active oxygen metabolism of Phoebe zhennan seedlings and its alleviation by nitrogen application [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2018, 42(2): 240-251. |
[11] | Dan-Dan LUO, Chuan-Kuan WANG, Ying JIN. Plant water-regulation strategies: Isohydric versus anisohydric behavior [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2017, 41(9): 1020-1032. |
[12] | Zhan-Wei ZHAI, Ji-Rui GONG, Qin-Pu LUO, Yan PAN, Taogetao BAOYIN, Sha XU, Min LIU, Li-Li YANG. Effects of nitrogen addition on photosynthetic characteristics of Leymus chinensis in the temperate grassland of Nei Mongol, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2017, 41(2): 196-208. |
[13] | Yu CEN, Mei-Zhen LIU. Effects of dew on eco-physiological traits and leaf structures of Leymus chinensis and Agropyron cristatum grown under drought stress [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2017, 41(11): 1199-1207. |
[14] | Rui GUO, Ji ZHOU, Fan YANG, Feng LI, Hao-Ru LI, Xu XIA, Qi LIU. Growth metabolism of wheat under drought stress at the jointing-booting stage [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2016, 40(12): 1319-1327. |
[15] | ZOU Chang-Ming,WANG Yun-Qing,LIU Ying,ZHANG Xiao-Hong,TANG Shan. Responses of photosynthesis and growth to weak light regime in four legume species [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2015, 39(9): 909-916. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn