植物生态学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 132-139.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0019
收稿日期:
2004-11-17
接受日期:
2005-04-08
出版日期:
2006-11-17
发布日期:
2006-01-30
通讯作者:
陈进
作者简介:
*E-mail:biotrans@bn.yn.cninfo.net基金资助:
GAO Xiu-Xia1,2, CHEN Jin1,*(), ZHOU Hui-Ping1,2, BAI Zhi-Lin1
Received:
2004-11-17
Accepted:
2005-04-08
Online:
2006-11-17
Published:
2006-01-30
Contact:
CHEN Jin
摘要:
该研究选用的3种舞花姜属植物中,毛舞花姜(Globba barthei)和双翅舞花姜(G. schomburgkii)自然条件下开花不结实,以珠芽进行繁殖;异果舞花姜(G. racemosa)则同时以种子和珠芽进行繁殖。在人工栽培条件下,高养分处理显著增加毛舞花姜的珠芽干重((1.11±0.10) g vs. (3.08±0.69) g,p=0.010 7)、珠芽数量((30.58±2.92) vs. (74.74±9.73),p=0.000 4)、珠芽大小((10.5±1.48) mg vs. (53.50±11.42) mg,p=0.001 5)、植株营养体重((3.99±0.23) g vs. (9.67±1.17) g,p=0.000 2)和双翅舞花姜的珠芽数量((51.74±3.64) vs. (108.71±21.52),p=0.018 1)。不同养分条件下两种舞花姜的开花数量无显著差异。人工去除珠芽、花对两种舞花姜植株当年生花和珠芽的数量无显著影响(p<0.05)。自然条件下异果舞花姜不同居群间珠芽大小、珠芽数、珠芽重、果实重、种子数和营养体重等均存在极显著差异(p<0.001)。异果舞花姜各居群植株珠芽数和营养体重(r=0.901,p<0.05)、珠芽重和珠芽大小 (r=0.849,p<0.05) 呈显著正相关;果实重和种子数(r=0.998,p<0.05) 呈显著正相关。土壤因子主成分分析表明前3个主成分提供的信息量分别为50.575%、18.204% 和11.883%,其中第一主成分中的全氮(0.959)、速效氮(0.885)和有机质(0.821)负荷量最大,第二主成分中土壤速效磷(0.824)负荷量最大。植株营养体重和土壤速效磷极显著正相关(r=0.906,p<0.01),珠芽大小与全氮(r=0.798)、速效氮(r=0.780)和有机质(r=0.821)均呈显著正相关(p<0.05)。果实重和种子数与土壤因子相关性不显著(p<0.05)。3种舞花姜的无性繁殖器官更易受到养分供应的影响,有性繁殖器官对养分供应变化响应不显著,有性和无性繁殖之间似不存在补偿关系。
高秀霞, 陈进, 周会平, 白智林. 养分供应对3种舞花姜属植物繁殖方式的影响. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(1): 132-139. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0019
GAO Xiu-Xia, CHEN Jin, ZHOU Hui-Ping, BAI Zhi-Lin. THE EFFECT OF NUTRIENT SUPPLY ON SEXUAL AND ASEXUAL REPRODUCTION OF THREE SPECIES OF GLOBBA. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2006, 30(1): 132-139. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0019
居群 Population | 经纬度 Latitude and longitude | 海拔(m) Altitude | 居群大小 (hm2) Population size | 土壤水分状况 Soil water supply | 受干扰程度 Degree of disturbance | 土壤类别 Soil group | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 22°53' N, 99°48' E | 1 700 | 5~10 | 丰富Rich | 中Slight | 红壤Red earths | |||||||||||||||
2 | 24°05' N, 99°44' E | 1 873 | 5~10 | 少Little | 强Intense | 黄棕壤Yellow brown earths | |||||||||||||||
3 | 24°04' N, 97°48' E | 1 136 | 10~20 | 丰富Rich | 少Little | 黄壤Yellow earths | |||||||||||||||
4 | 24°25' N, 97°50' E | 1 456 | 10~20 | 极丰富Very rich | 少Little | 红壤Red earths | |||||||||||||||
5 | 24°35' N, 97°40' E | 1 352 | 10~20 | 少Little | 强Intense | 黄红壤Yellow red earths | |||||||||||||||
6 | 24°56' N, 102°29' E | 2 100 | 10~20 | 极少Very little | 中Slight | 黄棕壤Yellow brown earths |
表1 异果舞花姜野外6个居群的地理位置、海拔及居群所处生态环境
Table 1 Location, altitude and ecological condition of the six populations of Globba racemosa
居群 Population | 经纬度 Latitude and longitude | 海拔(m) Altitude | 居群大小 (hm2) Population size | 土壤水分状况 Soil water supply | 受干扰程度 Degree of disturbance | 土壤类别 Soil group | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 22°53' N, 99°48' E | 1 700 | 5~10 | 丰富Rich | 中Slight | 红壤Red earths | |||||||||||||||
2 | 24°05' N, 99°44' E | 1 873 | 5~10 | 少Little | 强Intense | 黄棕壤Yellow brown earths | |||||||||||||||
3 | 24°04' N, 97°48' E | 1 136 | 10~20 | 丰富Rich | 少Little | 黄壤Yellow earths | |||||||||||||||
4 | 24°25' N, 97°50' E | 1 456 | 10~20 | 极丰富Very rich | 少Little | 红壤Red earths | |||||||||||||||
5 | 24°35' N, 97°40' E | 1 352 | 10~20 | 少Little | 强Intense | 黄红壤Yellow red earths | |||||||||||||||
6 | 24°56' N, 102°29' E | 2 100 | 10~20 | 极少Very little | 中Slight | 黄棕壤Yellow brown earths |
图1 不同肥力下毛舞花姜和双翅舞花姜繁殖和营养生长特征比较(t-test) 1. 毛舞花姜Globba barthei 2. 双翅舞花姜 Globba schomburgkii 数据点为平均值±标准误 (n=10) Bars are means±SE (n=10) 珠芽大小是每个珠芽的重量,其余参数是指整个植株的总和
Fig.1 Comparison of reproductive traits and plant characteristics of Globba barthei and G. schomburgkii under different fertilizer-level (t-test) Bulbil size mean the weight of a single bulbil, and the other parameters were the sum of each individual plant *: p<0.05 **:p<0.01 ***:p<0.001 ns:p>0.05
图2 不同肥力下去除花(珠芽)对毛舞花姜和双翅舞花姜珠芽数(花数)的影响(t-test) 数据点为平均值±标准误 (n=10) Bars are means±SE (n=10) 1. 低肥 Low fertilizer 2. 高肥 High fertilizer *:p<0.05 ns:p > 0.05
Fig.2 The effect of removing bulbils (flowers) to the number of flowers(bulbils) of Globba barthei and G. schomburgkii under different fertilizer-supply (t-test)
图3 不同居群中异果舞花姜的繁殖和营养生长特征比较(ANOVA) 数据点为平均值±标准误(n=30),具有相同字母平均值没有显著差异(p > 0.05) 珠芽大小是每个珠芽的重量,其余参数是指整个植株的总和
Fig.3 Comparison of reproductive traits and plant characteristics of Globba racemosa among six populations (ANOVA) Bars are means±SE (n=30) The mean values indicated by the same letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05) Bulbil size mean the weight of a single bulbil, and the other parameters were the sum of each individual plant
土壤因子Soil factors | 主分量1 Compent 1 | 主分量2 Compent 2 | 主分量3 Compent 3 |
---|---|---|---|
pH值 pH value | 0.594 | 0.319 | 0.649 |
有机质Organic matter | 0.821* | 0.331 | -0.303 |
速效氮Available nitrogen | 0.885* | 0.140 | -0.336 |
速效磷Available phosphorous | -0.223 | 0.824* | 0.305 |
速效钾Available potassium | 0.726 | 0.005 | 0.104 |
全氮Total nitrogen | 0.959* | 0.094 | -0.201 |
全磷Total phosphorous | 0.742 | -0.265 | 0.280 |
全钾Total potassium | -0.436 | 0.6847 | -0.319 |
各分量贡献率 Rate of variance (%) | 50.575 | 18.204 | 11.883 |
累计贡献率 Cumulative rate (%) | 50.575 | 68.779 | 80.662 |
表2 不同土壤因子的贡献率和主分量值
Table 2 The ratio of contribution and main weight value of different soil factors
土壤因子Soil factors | 主分量1 Compent 1 | 主分量2 Compent 2 | 主分量3 Compent 3 |
---|---|---|---|
pH值 pH value | 0.594 | 0.319 | 0.649 |
有机质Organic matter | 0.821* | 0.331 | -0.303 |
速效氮Available nitrogen | 0.885* | 0.140 | -0.336 |
速效磷Available phosphorous | -0.223 | 0.824* | 0.305 |
速效钾Available potassium | 0.726 | 0.005 | 0.104 |
全氮Total nitrogen | 0.959* | 0.094 | -0.201 |
全磷Total phosphorous | 0.742 | -0.265 | 0.280 |
全钾Total potassium | -0.436 | 0.6847 | -0.319 |
各分量贡献率 Rate of variance (%) | 50.575 | 18.204 | 11.883 |
累计贡献率 Cumulative rate (%) | 50.575 | 68.779 | 80.662 |
全氮 Total nitrogen | 速效氮 Available nitrogen | 速效磷 Available phosphorous | 有机质 Soil organic matter | |
---|---|---|---|---|
果实重FMA | -0.377 | -0.467 | -0.153 | -0.210 |
种子数SNU | -0.398 | -0.463 | -0.114 | -0.231 |
珠芽数BNU | -0.417 | -0.462 | 0.724 | -0.092 |
珠芽重BMA | 0.403 | 0.392 | 0.777* | 0.604 |
珠芽大小BSI | 0.798* | 0.780* | 0.388 | 0.821* |
繁殖体重RMA | -0.118 | -0.218 | 0.366 | 0.190 |
营养体重VMA | -0.402 | -0.379 | 0.906** | -0.057 |
果实重/珠芽重FBM | -0.444 | -0.599 | -0.252 | -0.270 |
果实重/营养体重FVM | -0.422 | -0.612 | -0.319 | -0.259 |
珠芽重/营养体重BVM | 0.672 | 0.740 | -0.502 | 0.317 |
繁殖体重/营养体重RVM | 0.253 | 0.116 | -0.893** | 0.053 |
表3 土壤主因子和异果舞花姜植株特征值之间的Pearson相关分析r值
Table 3 r-value of Pearson Correlation between soil main factors and plant characteristics of Globba racemosa
全氮 Total nitrogen | 速效氮 Available nitrogen | 速效磷 Available phosphorous | 有机质 Soil organic matter | |
---|---|---|---|---|
果实重FMA | -0.377 | -0.467 | -0.153 | -0.210 |
种子数SNU | -0.398 | -0.463 | -0.114 | -0.231 |
珠芽数BNU | -0.417 | -0.462 | 0.724 | -0.092 |
珠芽重BMA | 0.403 | 0.392 | 0.777* | 0.604 |
珠芽大小BSI | 0.798* | 0.780* | 0.388 | 0.821* |
繁殖体重RMA | -0.118 | -0.218 | 0.366 | 0.190 |
营养体重VMA | -0.402 | -0.379 | 0.906** | -0.057 |
果实重/珠芽重FBM | -0.444 | -0.599 | -0.252 | -0.270 |
果实重/营养体重FVM | -0.422 | -0.612 | -0.319 | -0.259 |
珠芽重/营养体重BVM | 0.672 | 0.740 | -0.502 | 0.317 |
繁殖体重/营养体重RVM | 0.253 | 0.116 | -0.893** | 0.053 |
FMA | SNU | BNU | BMA | VMA | FBM | RVM | FVM | BVM | BSI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
种子数SUN | 0.998** | I | ||||||||
珠芽数BNU | 0.385 | 0.394 | ||||||||
珠芽重BMA | -0.374 | -0.367 | 0.526 | |||||||
营养体重VMA | 0.145 | 0.170 | 0.901* | 0.629 | ||||||
果实重/珠芽重FBM | 0.971** | 0.960** | 0.335 | -0.469 | 0.105 | |||||
繁殖体重/营养体重RVM | 0.419 | 0.383 | -0.484 | -0.638 | -0.792 | 0.434 | ||||
果实重/营养体重FVM | 0.947** | 0.930** | 0.307 | -0.489 | 0.054 | 0.994** | 0.486 | |||
珠芽重/营养体重BVM | -0.589 | -0.604 | -0.768 | -0.089 | -0.794 | -0.623 | 0.429 | -0.581 | ||
珠芽大小BSI | -0.567 | -0.572 | 0.047 | 0.849* | 0.126 | -0.688 | -0.287 | -0.665 | 0.420 | |
繁殖体重RMA | 0.781 | 0.783 | 0.752 | 0.288 | 0.573 | 0.687 | 0.003 | 0.649 | -0.668 | -0.014 |
表4 异果舞花姜有性无性繁殖特征和营养生长之间的Pearson相关分析r值
Table 4 r-value of Pearson Correlation among the sexual and asexual reproductive traits and plant vegetative characteristics of Globba racemosa
FMA | SNU | BNU | BMA | VMA | FBM | RVM | FVM | BVM | BSI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
种子数SUN | 0.998** | I | ||||||||
珠芽数BNU | 0.385 | 0.394 | ||||||||
珠芽重BMA | -0.374 | -0.367 | 0.526 | |||||||
营养体重VMA | 0.145 | 0.170 | 0.901* | 0.629 | ||||||
果实重/珠芽重FBM | 0.971** | 0.960** | 0.335 | -0.469 | 0.105 | |||||
繁殖体重/营养体重RVM | 0.419 | 0.383 | -0.484 | -0.638 | -0.792 | 0.434 | ||||
果实重/营养体重FVM | 0.947** | 0.930** | 0.307 | -0.489 | 0.054 | 0.994** | 0.486 | |||
珠芽重/营养体重BVM | -0.589 | -0.604 | -0.768 | -0.089 | -0.794 | -0.623 | 0.429 | -0.581 | ||
珠芽大小BSI | -0.567 | -0.572 | 0.047 | 0.849* | 0.126 | -0.688 | -0.287 | -0.665 | 0.420 | |
繁殖体重RMA | 0.781 | 0.783 | 0.752 | 0.288 | 0.573 | 0.687 | 0.003 | 0.649 | -0.668 | -0.014 |
[1] | Angevine MW, Handel SN (1986). Invasion of forest floor space, clonal architecture, and population growth in the perennial herb Clintonia borealis. Journal of Ecology, 74,547-560. |
[2] | Biere A (1995). Genotypic and plastic variation in plant size: effects on fecundity and allocation patterns in Lychnis floscuculi along a gradient of natural soil fertility. Journal of Ecology, 83,629-642. |
[3] | Cain ML, Damman H (1997). Clonal growth and ramet performance in the woodland herb Asarum canadense. Journal of Ecology, 85,883-897. |
[4] | Cheplic GP (1995). Genotipic variation and plasticity of clonal growth in relation to nutrient availability in ampphibromus-scabrivalvis. Journal of Ecology, 83,459-468. |
[5] | Douglas DA (1981). The balance between vegetative and sexual reproduction of Mimulus primuloides (Scrophulariaceae) at different altitudes in California. Journal of Ecology, 69,295-310. |
[6] | Eckert CG (1999). Clonal plant research: proliferation, integration, but not much evolution. American Journal of Botany, 86,1649-1656. |
[7] | Eriksson O (1988). Ramet behavior and population growth in the clonal herb Potentilla anserina. Journal of Ecology, 76,522-536. |
[8] | Erisson O (1989). Seedling dynamics and life histories in clonal plants. Oikos, 55,231-238. |
[9] | Grant V (1981). Plant Specialization 2nd edn. Columbia University Press, New York,3-18. |
[10] | Holler LC, Abrahanson WG (1977). Seed and vegetative reproduction in relation to density in Fragaria (Rosaceae). American Journal of Botany, 64,1003-1007. |
[11] | Husband BC, Barrett SCH (1996). A metapopulation perspective in plant population biology. Journal of Ecology, 86,854-865. |
[12] | Jurik TW (1985). Differential costs of sexual and vegetative reproduction in wild strawberry populations. Oecologia, 66,394-403. |
[13] | Liu ZQ (刘志秋), Chen J (陈进), Bai ZL (白智林) (2004). Comparative studies on reproductive mechanisms of three species in Globba (Zingiberaceae). Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research (武汉植物学研究), 22,145-152. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[14] |
Margaret LR, James DB (2000). Genetic variation and evolutionary trade-offs for sexual and asexual reproductive modes in Allium vineale. American Journal of Botany, 87,1769-1777.
URL PMID |
[15] | Nault A, Gagnon D (1993). Ramet demography of Allium tricoccum, a spring ephemeral, perennial herb. Journal of Ecology, 81,101-119. |
[16] | Piquot Y, Petit D, Valero M, Cuguen J, de Laguerie P, Vernet P (1998). Variation in sexual and asexual reproduction among young and old population of the perennial macrophyte Sparganium erectum. Oikos, 82,139-148. |
[17] | Pitelka LF, Hansen SB, Ashmun JW (1985). Population biology of Clintonia borealis. I. Ramet and patch dynamics. Journal of Ecology, 73,169-183. |
[18] | Prati D, Schmid B (2000). Genetic differentiation of life-history traits within populations of the clonal plant Ranunculus reptans. Oikos, 90,442-456. |
[19] | Reekie EG (1991). Cost of seed versus rhizome production in Agropyron repens. Canadian Journal of Botany, 69,2678-2683. |
[20] | Reekie EG, Bazzaz FA (1987). Reproductive effort in plants. 3. Effect of reproduction on vegetative activity. American Naturalist, 129,907-919. |
[21] |
Reznick D, Nunney L, Tessier A (2000). Big houses, big cars, superfleas and the costs of reproduction. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 15,421-425.
DOI URL PMID |
[22] |
Ronsheim ML, Bever JD (2000). Genetic variation and evolutionary trade-offs for sexual and asexual reproductive modes in Allium vineale (Liliaceae). American Journal of Botany, 87,1769-1777.
URL PMID |
[23] | Sato T (2002). Size-dependent resource allocation among vegetative propagules and male and female functions in the forest herb Laportea bulbifera. Oikos, 96,453-462. |
[24] | Takano A, Okada H (2002). Multiple occurrences of triploid formation in Globba (Zingiberaceae) from molecular evidence. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 230,143-159. |
[25] |
Temels EJ, Pan IL, Brennan JL, Horwitt JN (2000). Evidence for ecological causation of sexual dimorphism in a hummingbird. Science, 289,441-443.
DOI URL PMID |
[26] |
Thompson FL, Eckert CG (2004). Trade-offs between sexual and clonal reproduction in an aquatic plant: experimental manipulations vs. phenotypic correlations. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 17,581-592.
DOI URL PMID |
[27] | Wijesinghe DK, Whigham DF (1997). Costs of producing clonal offspring and the effects of plant size on population dynamics of the woodland herb Uvularia perfoliata (Liliaceae). Journal of Ecology, 85,907-919. |
[28] | Worley AC, Harder LD (1996). Size-dependent resource allocation and costs of reproduction in Pinguicula vulgaris (Lentibulariaceae). Journal of Ecology, 84,195-206. |
[1] | 江康威 张青青 王亚菲 李宏 丁雨 杨永强 吐尔逊娜依·热依木. 放牧干扰下天山北坡中段植物功能群特征及其与土壤环境因子的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(预发表): 0-0. |
[2] | 魏瑶, 马志远, 周佳颖, 张振华. 模拟增温改变青藏高原植物繁殖物候及植株高度[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 995-1004. |
[3] | 代景忠, 白玉婷, 卫智军, 张楚, 闫瑞瑞. 切根对羊草营养生长期内植物功能性状的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(12): 1292-1302. |
[4] | 张婵, 安宇梦, Yun JÄSCHKE, 王林林, 周知里, 王力平, 杨永平, 段元文. 青藏高原及周边高山地区的植物繁殖生态学研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(1): 1-21. |
[5] | 陈林, 王磊, 杨新国, 宋乃平, 李月飞, 苏莹, 卞莹莹, 祝忠有, 孟文婷. 荒漠草原猪毛蒿种群繁殖特征的土壤驱动因子分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(1): 65-76. |
[6] | 辜翔, 张仕吉, 刘兆丹, 李雷达, 陈金磊, 王留芳, 方晰. 中亚热带植被恢复对土壤有机碳含量、碳密度的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(5): 595-608. |
[7] | 辜翔, 张仕吉, 刘兆丹, 李雷达, 陈金磊, 王留芳, 方晰. 湖南东部植被恢复对土壤有机碳矿化的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(12): 1211-1224. |
[8] | 龙文兴, 丁易, 臧润国, 杨民, 陈少伟. 海南岛霸王岭热带云雾林雨季的环境特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(2): 137-146. |
[9] | 冯丽, 张景光, 张志山, 郭群, 李新荣. 腾格里沙漠人工固沙植被中油蒿的生长及生物量分配动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(6): 1132-1139. |
[10] | 田大栓, 包祥, 关其格, 潘庆民. 内蒙古草原3种针茅属植物不同组织水平的生物量生殖分配[J]. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(1): 97-107. |
[11] | 周会平, 陈进, 张寿洲. 具混合繁殖策略的草本植物异果舞花姜的居群遗传结构[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(4): 751-759. |
[12] | 陶玲, 尹黎燕, 李伟. 除草剂苄嘧磺隆对粗梗水蕨配子体生长和性器官分化的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(2): 408-412. |
[13] | 朱雅娟, 阿拉腾宝, 董鸣, 黄振英. 增加水分与养分对克隆植物羊柴自然种群繁殖权衡的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2007, 31(4): 658-664. |
[14] | 方向文, 王万鹏, 何小琴, 王刚. 扰动环境中不同刈割方式对柠条营养生长补偿的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(5): 810-816. |
[15] | 吴彦, 刘庆, 乔永康, 潘开文, 赵常明, 陈庆恒. 亚高山针叶林不同恢复阶段群落物种多样性变化及其对土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2001, 25(6): 648-655. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19