模拟增温改变青藏高原植物繁殖物候及植株高度

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2021.0450

植物生态学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (9): 995-1004.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2021.0450

所属专题：全球变化与生态系统；青藏高原植物生态学：生态系统生态学；青藏高原植物生态学：种群生态学

模拟增温改变青藏高原植物繁殖物候及植株高度

魏瑶¹^,⁴, 马志远², 周佳颖³, 张振华¹^,^*()

¹中国科学院西北高原生物研究所, 青海海北高寒草地生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站, 高原生物适应与进化重点实验室, 西宁 810008
²北京大学城市与环境学院, 地表过程分析与模拟重点实验室, 北京 100871
³青海大学生态环境工程学院, 西宁 810016
⁴中国科学院大学, 北京 100049

收稿日期:2021-12-06 接受日期:2022-04-20 出版日期:2022-09-20 发布日期:2022-10-19
通讯作者: 张振华
作者简介:*张振华:ORCID:0000-0002-1862-0473(zhenhua@nwipb.cas.cn)
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(31971467);国家自然科学基金(31630009);第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究项目(2019QZKK0302)

Experimental warming changed reproductive phenology and height of alpine plants on the Qingzang Plateau

WEI Yao¹^,⁴, MA Zhi-Yuan², ZHOU Jia-Ying³, ZHANG Zhen-Hua¹^,^*()

¹Qinghai Haibei National Field Research Station of Alpine Grassland Ecosystem, Key Laboratory of Adaptation and Evolution of Plateau Biota, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810008, China
²Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes of the Ministry of Education, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
³College of Eco-Environmental Engineering, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China
⁴University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2021-12-06 Accepted:2022-04-20 Online:2022-09-20 Published:2022-10-19
Contact: ZHANG Zhen-Hua
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(31971467);National Natural Science Foundation of China(31630009);Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research (STEP) Program of China(2019QZKK0302)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

气候变化显著影响了高寒植物物候期及生长模式, 从而改变了高寒生态系统功能。而高寒植物物候期和生长状况对气候变化的响应程度, 与其自身资源分配策略有关。为了更好地探究气候变化下高寒植物繁殖物候及生长的规律, 该研究以青藏高原高寒草甸为研究对象, 按生物量从高到低选取15种常见植物, 其生物量之和占样地总生物量80%以上, 采用红外辐射器模拟增温的方法, 利用同质园实验, 观测无种间竞争条件下, 增温2年间植物返青、现蕾、开花以及结实物候, 并监测了植株高度。研究结果表明: (1)在功能群水平上, 增温使豆科类植物的返青、现蕾和开花时间分别显著提前了(8.21 ± 1.81)、(9.14 ± 2.41)和(10.14 ± 2.05) d, 使其开花持续时间显著延长了(6.14 ± 1.52) d, 而增温对其他功能群物候事件无显著影响。增温对高寒植物物候的影响存在种间及年际间差异, 但总体上增温使大多数高寒植物繁殖物候提前并且开花持续时间延长, 将更多的资源更多地分配到繁殖生长上。(2)增温显著降低了杂类草植物的植株高度(平均降低(3.58 ± 0.96) cm), 但对豆科类、禾草类及莎草类功能群植株高度没有显著影响。增温对高寒植物植株高度的影响存在显著的种间差异以及年际差异。综上所述, 未来气候变暖背景下, 青藏高原高寒植物群落可能更早进入繁殖阶段, 从而降低在营养生长上的资源分配。另外, 由于各物种繁殖能力和营养生长对温度变化响应的差异, 气候变暖将导致高寒植物群落中各物种盖度的变化, 进而改变群落物种组成, 从而影响高寒生态系统的功能。

关键词: 高寒植物, 气候变化, 红外加热, 繁殖物候, 营养生长, 青藏高原

Abstract:

Aims Climate change is significantly altering the phenology and growth pattern of alpine plants related to their resource allocation strategies, thereby changing the functioning of alpine ecosystems. The aim of this study is to explore responses of reproductive phenology and vegetative growth of alpine plants to climate warming on the Qingzang Plateau.

Methods Experimental warming was achieved using infrared heating. From 2017 to 2018, we measured the reproductive phenology (leaf out, flower bud, flower and fruit time) and maximum height of 15 common alpine plants (account more than 80% of the total above biomass) under non-competitive condition via common garden experiment.

Important findings Our results showed that: (1) Experimental warming significantly advanced the leaf out, flower bud and first flowering day of legumes by (8.21 ± 1.81), (9.14 ± 2.41) and (10.14 ± 2.05) d, respectively. In addition, warming significantly prolonged the flowering duration of legumes by (6.14 ± 1.52) d. This result implied that different functional groups showed different responses under warming. The reproductive phenology of most alpine plants advanced, and the flowering duration was prolonged under warming, suggesting that more resources was allocated to reproductive growth. (2) In addition, experimental warming significantly reduced the height of forbs by (3.58 ± 0.96) cm, but not of other functional groups. Different species have differential responses to warming in different year. In summary, the alpine plant community on the Qingzang Plateau may start the reproductive stage earlier, hence reducing the resource allocation for vegetative growth under future warming conditions. In addition, due to different responses of the reproductive capacity and vegetative growth of various species to temperature change, climate warming may change the coverage of various species, and then alter the composition of species in the community, and then change the function of alpine ecosystem.

Key words: alpine plant, climate change, infrared heating, reproductive phenology, vegetative growth, Qingzang Plateau

魏瑶, 马志远, 周佳颖, 张振华. 模拟增温改变青藏高原植物繁殖物候及植株高度. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 995-1004. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2021.0450

WEI Yao, MA Zhi-Yuan, ZHOU Jia-Ying, ZHANG Zhen-Hua. Experimental warming changed reproductive phenology and height of alpine plants on the Qingzang Plateau. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2022, 46(9): 995-1004. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2021.0450

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2021.0450

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2022/V46/I9/995

图/表 4

表1 增温后青藏高原不同功能群高寒植物物候期及高度变化(平均值±标准误)

Table 1 Changes of phenological period and height among alpine plants of different functional groups under warming condition on the Qingzang Plateau (mean ± SE)

功能群 Functional group	返青时间 Leaf out time (d)	现蕾时间 Flower bud time (d)	开花时间 Flower time (d)	结实时间 Fruit time (d)	开花持续时间 Flowering time (d)	高度 Height (cm)
豆科类 Legumes	-8.21 ± 1.81^*	-9.14 ± 2.41^*	-10.14 ± 2.05^*	-4.72 ± 1.96	6.14 ± 1.52^*	0.92 ± 0.66
禾草类 Grasses	-1.67 ± 1.59	-6.07 ± 2.18	-0.30 ± 3.17	-0.40 ± 0.99	-0.10 ± 3.71	-1.95 ± 2.05
莎草类 Sedges	1.58 ± 2.25	-4.99 ± 5.02	-7.95 ± 5.74	0.56 ± 3.50	9.72 ± 3.89	0.70 ± 1.86
杂类草 Forbs	-1.08 ± 0.92	-5.25 ± 3.70	-3.04 ± 4.22	-4.64 ± 4.96	-1.31 ± 1.42	-3.58 ± 0.96^*

图1 增温下2017和2018年青藏高原高寒植物各物种返青(A、B)、现蕾(C、D)、开花(E、F)、结实(G、H)时间的变化(平均值±标准误)。图中正、负值分别表示与对照相比推迟、提前的天数; *表示增温处理与对照相比差异显著(p < 0.05)。Cp, 红棕薹草; En, 垂穗披碱草; Gf, 线叶龙胆; Gs, 麻花艽; Ht, 藏异燕麦; Kc, 线叶嵩草; Kh, 矮生嵩草; Mr, 花苜蓿; Ok, 甘肃棘豆; Pp, 草地早熟禾; Pf, 金露梅; Pv, 珠芽蓼; Sa, 异针茅; Sp, 美丽风毛菊; Th, 高山豆。

Fig. 1 Changes of leaf out time (A, B), flower bud time (C, D), flower time (E, F) and fruit time (G, H) among each species of alpine plants on the Qingzang Plateau in 2017 and 2018 under warming condition (mean ± SE). A positive value indicates later than the control; a negative value indicates earlier than the control. * indicates significant difference between treatment and the control (p < 0.05). Cp, Carex przewalskii; En, Elymus nutans; Gf, Gentiana lawrencei var. farreri; Gs, Gentiana straminea; Ht, Helictotrichon tibeticum; Kc, Kobresia capillifolia; Kh, Kobresia humilis; Mr, Medicago ruthenica; Ok, Oxytropis kansuensis; Pp, Poa pratensis; Pf, Potentilla fruticosa; Pv, Polygonum viviparum; Sa, Stipa aliena; Sp, Saussurea pulchra; Th, Tibetia himalaica.

图2 增温下2017 (A)和2018 (B)年青藏高原高寒植物各物种开花持续时间变化(平均值±标准误)。图中正、负值分别表示与对照相比延长、缩短的天数。*表示增温处理与对照相比差异显著(p < 0.05)。Cp, 红棕薹草; En, 垂穗披碱草; Gf, 线叶龙胆; Gs, 麻花艽; Ht, 藏异燕麦; Kc, 线叶嵩草; Kh, 矮生嵩草; Mr, 花苜蓿; Ok, 甘肃棘豆; Pp, 草地早熟禾; Pf, 金露梅; Pv, 珠芽蓼; Sa, 异针茅; Sp, 美丽风毛菊; Th, 高山豆。

Fig. 2 Changes of flowering time among each species of alpine plants on the Qingzang Plateau in 2017 (A) and 2018 (B) under warming condition (mean ± SE). A positive value indicates longer flowering time than the control; a negative value indicates shorter flowering time than the control. * indicates significant difference between treatment and the control (p < 0.05). Cp, Carex przewalskii; En, Elymus nutans; Gf, Gentiana lawrencei var. farreri; Gs, Gentiana straminea; Ht, Helictotrichon tibeticum; Kc, Kobresia capillifolia; Kh, Kobresia humilis; Mr, Medicago ruthenica; Ok, Oxytropis kansuensis; Pp, Poa pratensis; Pf, Potentilla fruticosa; Pv, Polygonum viviparum; Sa, Stipa aliena; Sp, Saussurea pulchra; Th, Tibetia himalaica.

图3 增温下2017 (A)和2018 (B)年青藏高原高寒植物各物种植株高度变化(平均值±标准误)。图中正、负值分别表示与对照相比升高、降低的高度。*表示增温处理与对照相比差异显著(p < 0.05)。Cp, 红棕薹草; En, 垂穗披碱草; Gf, 线叶龙胆; Gs, 麻花艽; Ht, 藏异燕麦; Kc, 线叶嵩草; Kh, 矮生嵩草; Mr, 花苜蓿; Ok, 甘肃棘豆; Pp, 草地早熟禾; Pf, 金露梅; Pv, 珠芽蓼; Sa, 异针茅; Sp, 美丽风毛菊; Th, 高山豆。

Fig. 3 Changes of height among each species of alpine plants on the Qingzang Plateau in 2017 (A) and 2018 (B) under warming condition (mean ± SE). A positive value indicates higher height than the control; a negative value indicates lower height than the control. * indicates significant difference between treatment and the control (p < 0.05). Cp, Carex przewalskii; En, Elymus nutans; Gf, Gentiana lawrencei var. farreri; Gs, Gentiana straminea; Ht, Helictotrichon tibeticum; Kc, Kobresia capillifolia; Kh, Kobresia humilis; Mr, Medicago ruthenica; Ok, Oxytropis kansuensis; Pp, Poa pratensis; Pf, Potentilla fruticosa; Pv, Polygonum viviparum; Sa, Stipa aliena; Sp, Saussurea pulchra; Th, Tibetia himalaica.

参考文献 39

[1]	Álvarez-Cansino L, Zunzunegui M, Díaz Barradas MC, Esquivias MP (2010). Gender-specific costs of reproduction on vegetative growth and physiological performance in the dioecious shrub Corema album. Annals of Botany, 106, 989-998.
[2]	Bjorkman AD, Myers-Smith IH, Elmendorf SC, Normand S, Rüger N, Beck PSA, Blach-Overgaard A, Blok D, Cornelissen JHC, Forbes BC, Georges D, Goetz SJ, Guay KC, Henry GHR, HilleRisLambers J, et al. (2018). Plant functional trait change across a warming tundra biome. Nature, 562, 57-62. DOI URL
[3]	Cleland EE, Chuine I, Menzel A, Mooney HA, Schwartz MD (2007). Shifting plant phenology in response to global change. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 22, 357-365. DOI URL
[4]	Díaz S, Kattge J, Cornelissen JHC, Wright IJ, Lavorel S, Dray S, Reu B, Kleyer M, Wirth C, Prentice IC, Garnier E, Bönisch G, Westoby M, Poorter H, Reich PB, et al. (2016). The global spectrum of plant form and function. Nature, 529, 167-171. DOI URL
[5]	Dorji T, Hopping KA, Meng FD, Wang SP, Jiang LL, Klein JA (2020). Impacts of climate change on flowering phenology and production in alpine plants: the importance of end of flowering. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 291, 106795. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2019.106795. DOI
[6]	Dorji T, Totland Ø, Moe SR, Hopping KA, Pan JB, Klein JA (2013). Plant functional traits mediate reproductive phenology and success in response to experimental warming and snow addition in Tibet. Global Change Biology, 19, 459-472. DOI PMID
[7]	Fitchett JM, Grab SW, Thompson DI (2015). Plant phenology and climate change: progress in methodological approaches and application. Progress in Physical Geography, 39, 460-482.
[8]	[IPCC (The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)(2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis: Summary for Policymakers. [2021-11-28]. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_SPM_final.pdf.
[9]	Jiang LL, Wang SP, Meng FD, Duan JC, Niu HS, Xu GP, Zhu XX, Zhang ZH, Luo CY, Cui SJ, Li YM, Li XE, Wang Q, Zhou Y, Bao XY, et al. (2016). Relatively stable response of fruiting stage to warming and cooling relative to other phenological events. Ecology, 97, 1961-1969. DOI PMID
[10]	Klein JA, Harte J, Zhao XQ (2008). Decline in medicinal and forage species with warming is mediated by plant traits on the Tibetan Plateau. Ecosystems, 11, 775-789. DOI URL
[11]	Körner C (1998). A re-assessment of high elevation treeline positions and their explanation. Oecologia, 115, 445-459. DOI PMID
[12]	Körner C (2003). Alpine Plant Life: Functional Plant Ecology of High Mountain Ecosystems. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany.
[13]	Li P, Liu ZL, Zhou XL, Xie BG, Li ZW, Luo YP, Zhu QA, Peng CH (2021). Combined control of multiple extreme climate stressors on autumn vegetation phenology on the Tibetan Plateau under past and future climate change. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 308-309, 108571. DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108571. DOI
[14]	Li XE, Jiang LL, Meng FD, Wang SP, Niu HS, Iler AM, Duan JC, Zhang ZH, Luo CY, Cui SJ, Zhang LR, Li YM, Wang Q, Zhou Y, Bao XY, et al. (2016). Responses of sequential and hierarchical phenological events to warming and cooling in alpine meadows. Nature Communications, 7, 12489. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12489. DOI
[15]	Liu HY, Mi ZR, Lin L, Wang YH, Zhang ZH, Zhang FW, Wang H, Liu LL, Zhu B, Cao GM, Zhao XQ, Sanders NJ, Classen AT, Reich PB, He JS (2018). Shifting plant species composition in response to climate change stabilizes grassland primary production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, 4051-4056. DOI PMID
[16]	Ma ZY (2020). The Effects of Climate Change on Plant Community Diversity and Ecosystem Function in an Alpine Grassland on the Tibetan Plateau. PhD dissertation, Peking University, Beijing. 102-119.
	[ 马志远 (2020). 气候变化对高寒草地植物群落多样性和生态系统功能的影响.博士学位论文, 北京大学, 北京. 102-119.]
[17]	Ma ZY, Liu HY, Mi ZR, Zhang ZH, Wang YH, Xu W, Jiang L, He JS (2017). Climate warming reduces the temporal stability of plant community biomass production. Nature Communications, 8, 15378. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15378. DOI
[18]	Meng FD, Jiang LL, Zhang ZH, Cui SJ, Duan JC, Wang SP, Luo CY, Wang Q, Zhou Y, Li XE, Zhang LR, Li BW, Dorji T, Li YN, Du MY (2017). Changes in flowering functional group affect responses of community phenological sequences to temperature change. Ecology, 98, 734-740. DOI PMID
[19]	Molau U (1993). Relationships between flowering phenology and life history strategies in tundra plants. Arctic and Alpine Research, 25, 391. DOI: 10.2307/1551922. DOI
[20]	Park T, Chen C, Macias-Fauria M, Tømmervik H, Choi S, Winkler A, Bhatt US, Walker DA, Piao SL, Brovkin V, Nemani RR, Myneni RB (2019). Changes in timing of seasonal peak photosynthetic activity in northern ecosystems. Global Change Biology, 25, 2382-2395.
[21]	Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Díaz S, Garnier E, Lavorel S, Poorter H, Jaureguiberry P, Bret-Harte MS, Cornwell WK, Craine JM, Gurvich DE, Urcelay C, Veneklaas EJ, Reich PB, Poorter L, Wright IJ, et al. (2013). New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany, 61, 167-234. DOI URL
[22]	Reich PB, Sendall KM, Rice KR, Rich RL, Stefanski A, Hobbie SE, Montgomery RA (2015). Geographic range predicts photosynthetic and growth response to warming in co-occurring tree species. Nature Climate Change, 5, 148-152. DOI URL
[23]	Shen MG, Piao SL, Dorji T, Liu Q, Cong N, Chen XQ, An S, Wang SP, Wang T, Zhang GX (2015). Plant phenological responses to climate change on the Tibetan Plateau: research status and challenges. National Science Review, 2, 454-467. DOI URL
[24]	Shen ZX, Zhou XM, Chen ZZ, Zhou HK (2002). Response of plant groups to simulated rainfall and nitrogen supply in alpine Kobresia humilis meadow. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 26, 288-294.
	[沈振西, 周兴民, 陈佐忠, 周华坤 (2002). 高寒矮嵩草草甸植物类群对模拟降水和施氮的响应. 植物生态学报, 26, 288-294.]
[25]	Suonan J, Classen AT, Sanders NJ, He JS (2019). Plant phenological sensitivity to climate change on the Tibetan Plateau and relative to other areas of the world. Ecosphere, 10, e02543. DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.2543. DOI
[26]	Suonan J, Classen AT, Zhang ZH, He JS (2017). Asymmetric winter warming advanced plant phenology to a greater extent than symmetric warming in an alpine meadow. Functional Ecology, 31, 2147-2156. DOI URL
[27]	Wang CY, Cheng HY, Wei M, Wang S, Wu BD, Du DL (2021). Plant height and leaf size: Which one is more important in affecting the successful invasion of Solidago canadensis and Conyza canadensis in urban ecosystems? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 59, 127033. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127033. DOI
[28]	Wang H, Liu HY, Cao GM, Ma ZY, Li YK, Zhang FW, Zhao X, Zhao XQ, Jiang L, Sanders NJ, Classen AT, He JS (2020). Alpine grassland plants grow earlier and faster but biomass remains unchanged over 35 years of climate change. Ecology Letters, 23, 701-710. DOI PMID
[29]	Wang SP, Duan JC, Xu GP, Wang YF, Zhang ZH, Rui YC, Luo CY, Xu B, Zhu XX, Chang XF, Cui XY, Niu HS, Zhao XQ, Wang WY (2012). Effects of warming and grazing on soil N availability, species composition, and ANPP in an alpine meadow. Ecology, 93, 2365-2376. PMID
[30]	Wang SP, Meng FD, Duan JC, Wang YF, Cui XY, Piao SL, Niu HS, Xu GP, Luo CY, Zhang ZH, Zhu XX, Shen MG, Li YN, Du MY, Tang YH, et al. (2014a). Asymmetric sensitivity of first flowering date to warming and cooling in alpine plants. Ecology, 95, 3387-3398. DOI URL
[31]	Wang SP, Wang CS, Duan JC, Zhu XX, Xu GP, Luo CY, Zhang ZH, Meng FD, Li YN, Du MY (2014b). Timing and duration of phenological sequences of alpine plants along an elevation gradient on the Tibetan Plateau. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 189- 190, 220-228.
[32]	Wang XH, Piao SL, Ciais P, Li JS, Friedlingstein P, Koven C, Chen AP (2011). Spring temperature change and its implication in the change of vegetation growth in North America from 1982 to 2006. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 1240-1245. DOI PMID
[33]	Wang ZP, Zhang XZ, He YT, Shi PL, Zu JX, Niu B, Li M (2018). Effects of precipitation changes on the precipitation use efficiency and aboveground productivity of alpine steppe-meadow on northern Tibetan Plateau, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 29, 1822-1828.
	[王志鹏, 张宪洲, 何永涛, 石培礼, 俎佳星, 牛犇, 李猛 (2018). 降水变化对藏北高寒草原化草甸降水利用效率及地上生产力的影响. 应用生态学报, 29, 1822-1828.] DOI
[34]	Xia JY, Niu SL, Ciais P, Janssens IA, Chen JQ, Ammann C, Arain A, Blanken PD, Cescatti A, Bonal D, Buchmann N, Curtis PS, Chen SP, Dong JW, Flanagan LB, et al. (2015). Joint control of terrestrial gross primary productivity by plant phenology and physiology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, 2788-2793. DOI PMID
[35]	Xu W, Zhu MY, Zhang ZH, Ma ZY, Liu HY, Chen LT, Cao GM, Zhao XQ, Schmid B, He JS (2018). Experimentally simulating warmer and wetter climate additively improves rangeland quality on the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Applied Ecology, 55, 1486-1497. DOI URL
[36]	Yu HY, Xu JC (2009). Effects of climate change on vegetations on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: a review. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 28, 747-754.
	[于海英, 许建初 (2009). 气候变化对青藏高原植被影响研究综述. 生态学杂志, 28, 747-754.]
[37]	Zhang L, Wang GX, Ran F, Peng AH, Xiao Y, Yang Y, Yang Y (2018). Experimental warming changed plants’ phenological sequences of two dominant species in an alpine meadow, western of Sichuan. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 42, 20-27. DOI
	[张莉, 王根绪, 冉飞, 彭阿辉, 肖瑶, 杨阳, 杨燕 (2018). 模拟增温改变川西高山草甸优势植物繁殖物候序列特征. 植物生态学报, 42, 20-27.] DOI
[38]	Zhao XQ, Zhou XM (1999). Ecological basis of alpine meadow ecosystem management in Tibet: Haibei alpine meadow ecosystem research station. Ambio, 28, 642-647.
[39]	Zhu JT (2016). Effects of experimental warming on plant reproductive phenology in Xizang alpine meadow. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 40, 1028-1036. DOI URL
	[朱军涛 (2016). 实验增温对藏北高寒草甸植物繁殖物候的影响. 植物生态学报, 40, 1028-1036.] DOI

模拟增温改变青藏高原植物繁殖物候及植株高度

Experimental warming changed reproductive phenology and height of alpine plants on the Qingzang Plateau

全文

PDF (PC)

附录附件

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 39

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈以恒玉素甫江·如素力阿卜杜热合曼·吾斯曼. 2001-2020年天山新疆段草地植被覆盖度时空变化及驱动因素分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(5): 561-576.
[2]	张计深, 史新杰, 刘宇诺, 吴阳, 彭守璋. 气候变化下中国潜在自然植被生态系统碳储量动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 428-444.
[3]	臧妙涵, 王传宽, 梁逸娴, 刘逸潇, 上官虹玉, 全先奎. 基于纬度移栽的落叶松叶、枝、根生态化学计量特征对气候变暖的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 469-482.
[4]	梁逸娴, 王传宽, 臧妙涵, 上官虹玉, 刘逸潇, 全先奎. 落叶松径向生长和生物量分配对气候变暖的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 459-468.
[5]	吴茹茹, 刘美珍, 谷仙, 常馨月, 郭立月, 蒋高明, 祁如意. 气候变化对巨柏适宜生境分布的潜在影响和预测[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 445-458.
[6]	杨宇萌, 来全, 刘心怡. 气候变化和人类活动对内蒙古植被总初级生产力的定量影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(3): 306-316.
[7]	张启, 程雪寒, 王树芝. 北京西山老龄树记载的森林干扰历史[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(3): 341-348.
[8]	赵艳超, 陈立同. 土壤养分对青藏高原高寒草地生物量响应增温的调节作用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(8): 1071-1081.
[9]	任培鑫, 李鹏, 彭长辉, 周晓路, 杨铭霞. 洞庭湖流域植被光合物候的时空变化及其对气候变化的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(3): 319-330.
[10]	师生波, 周党卫, 李天才, 德科加, 杲秀珍, 马家麟, 孙涛, 王方琳. 青藏高原高山嵩草光合功能对模拟夜间低温的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(3): 361-373.
[11]	李杰, 郝珉辉, 范春雨, 张春雨, 赵秀海. 东北温带森林树种和功能多样性对生态系统多功能性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(11): 1507-1522.
[12]	师生波, 师瑞, 周党卫, 张雯. 低温对高山嵩草叶片光化学和非光化学能量耗散特征的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(10): 1441-1452.
[13]	林马震, 黄勇, 李洋, 孙建. 高寒草地植物生存策略地理分布特征及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(1): 41-50.
[14]	朱玉英, 张华敏, 丁明军, 余紫萍. 青藏高原植被绿度变化及其对干湿变化的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(1): 51-64.
[15]	党宏忠, 张学利, 韩辉, 石长春, 葛玉祥, 马全林, 陈帅, 刘春颖. 樟子松固沙林林水关系研究进展及对营林实践的指导[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 971-983.