植物生态学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 275-282.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0027
出版日期:
2015-03-01
发布日期:
2015-03-17
通讯作者:
周启星
作者简介:
# 共同第一作者
基金资助:
Online:
2015-03-01
Published:
2015-03-17
Contact:
Qi-Xing ZHOU
About author:
# Co-first authors
摘要:
通过微体繁殖技术在多氯联苯(PCBs)污染土壤基质上进行大金发藓(Polytrichum commune)的室内培养, 研究了不同浓度(5、10和20 mg·kg-1)低氯PCBs (Aroclor 1242)和高氯PCBs Aroclor 1254)对大金发藓生理生态指标的影响。经6个月的培养, 大金发藓的密度和盖度分别达93%和50株·cm-2以上, PCBs处理组与对照组相比无显著差异, 表明PCBs对大金发藓茎叶碎片再生成新植株体的能力没有产生不利影响。大金发藓鲜质量和株高随低氯PCBs (Aroclor 1242)浓度增加而增加、随高氯PCBs (Aroclor 1254)浓度增加而减小, 但均高于对照, 表明PCBs处理对大金发藓的生长具有一定的促进作用。PCBs处理组大金发藓叶绿素a、b以及叶绿素a + b含量较对照组有所增加, 叶绿素a/b值与对照组相比基本没有变化。PCBs处理组大金发藓膜脂过氧化产物丙二醛含量和超氧化物歧化酶活性与对照组相比无显著差异, 谷胱甘肽含量较对照组显著增加, 表明谷胱甘肽在大金发藓体内活性氧清除过程中起重要作用。总体来看, 大金发藓能在所设浓度的PCBs范围内正常生长, 对PCBs有较强的耐性。
吴启美, 周启星. 大金发藓对土壤多氯联苯污染的生理生态响应. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(3): 275-282. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0027
WU Qi-Mei,ZHOU Qi-Xing. Eco-physiological responses of Polytrichum commune to soil contamination by polychlorinated biphenyls. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2015, 39(3): 275-282. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0027
图1 不同浓度(mg·kg-1)多氯联苯(PCBs)污染对大金发藓生长的影响。A, Aroclor 1242污染1个月。B, Aroclor 1254 污染1个月。C, Aroclor 1242 污染6个月。D, Aroclor 1254 污染6个月。
Fig. 1 Effects of different concentration (mg·kg-1) polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) contamination on the growth of Polytichum commune. A, Aroclor 1242 contaminated 1 month. B, Aroclor 1254 contaminated 1 month. C, Aroclor 1242 contaminated 6 months. D, Aroclor 1254 contaminated 6 months.
图2 多氯联苯(PCBs)污染对大金发藓盖度和密度的影响(平均值±标准偏差)。
Fig. 2 Effects of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) contamination on the coverage and density of Polytichum commune (mean ± SD).
图3 多氯联苯(PCBs)污染对大金发藓株高(A)和鲜质量(B)的影响(平均值±标准偏差)。不同小写字母表示Aroclor 1242不同处理间差异显著(p < 0.05)。不同大写字母表示Aroclor 1254处理间差异显著(p < 0.05)。
Fig. 3 Effects of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) contamination on the height (A) and fresh mass (B) of Polytichum commune (mean ± SD). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different Aroclor 1242 treatments (p < 0.05). Different capital letters indicate significant differences among different Aroclor 1254 treatments (p < 0.05).
污染物 Pollutant | 浓度 Concentration (μg·kg-1) | Chl a (mg·g-1) | 处理/对照 Treatment / control (%) | Chl b (mg·g-1) | 处理/对照 Treatment / control (%) | Chl a + b (mg·g-1) | 处理/对照 Treatment / control (%) | Chl a / b | 处理/对照 Treatment / Control (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 2.32 ± 0.13aA | 100.00 | 0.92 ± 0.05aA | 100.00 | 3.23 ± 0.18aA | 100.00 | 2.52 ± 0.01aA | 100.00 | |
Aroclor 1242 | 5 | 2.78 ± 0.29ab | 119.71 | 1.09 ± 0.12a | 118.98 | 3.87 ± 0.41a | 119.51 | 2.54 ± 0.02a | 100.67 |
10 | 2.54 ± 0.10ab | 109.60 | 1.00 ± 0.05a | 108.51 | 3.54 ± 0.15a | 109.29 | 2.55 ± 0.03a | 101.03 | |
20 | 2.97 ± 0.54b | 128.04 | 1.16 ± 0.22a | 125.85 | 4.12 ± 0.76a | 127.42 | 2.57 ± 0.04a | 101.91 | |
Aroclor 1254 | 5 | 2.55 ± 0.16AB | 109.99 | 0.99 ± 0.07AB | 107.18 | 3.53 ± 0.22AB | 109.20 | 2.59 ± 0.03B | 102.66 |
10 | 2.77 ± 0.33B | 119.39 | 1.10 ± 0.13B | 119.56 | 3.86 ± 0.46B | 119.44 | 2.52 ± 0.03A | 99.88 | |
20 | 2.35 ± 0.02A | 101.50 | 0.91 ± 0.01A | 98.75 | 3.26 ± 0.03A | 100.72 | 2.59 ± 0.00B | 102.79 |
表1 多氯联苯(PCBs)污染对大金发藓叶绿素含量的影响(平均值±标准偏差)
Table 1 Effects of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) contamination on the content of chlorophyll (Chl) in Polytichum commune (mean ± SD)
污染物 Pollutant | 浓度 Concentration (μg·kg-1) | Chl a (mg·g-1) | 处理/对照 Treatment / control (%) | Chl b (mg·g-1) | 处理/对照 Treatment / control (%) | Chl a + b (mg·g-1) | 处理/对照 Treatment / control (%) | Chl a / b | 处理/对照 Treatment / Control (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 2.32 ± 0.13aA | 100.00 | 0.92 ± 0.05aA | 100.00 | 3.23 ± 0.18aA | 100.00 | 2.52 ± 0.01aA | 100.00 | |
Aroclor 1242 | 5 | 2.78 ± 0.29ab | 119.71 | 1.09 ± 0.12a | 118.98 | 3.87 ± 0.41a | 119.51 | 2.54 ± 0.02a | 100.67 |
10 | 2.54 ± 0.10ab | 109.60 | 1.00 ± 0.05a | 108.51 | 3.54 ± 0.15a | 109.29 | 2.55 ± 0.03a | 101.03 | |
20 | 2.97 ± 0.54b | 128.04 | 1.16 ± 0.22a | 125.85 | 4.12 ± 0.76a | 127.42 | 2.57 ± 0.04a | 101.91 | |
Aroclor 1254 | 5 | 2.55 ± 0.16AB | 109.99 | 0.99 ± 0.07AB | 107.18 | 3.53 ± 0.22AB | 109.20 | 2.59 ± 0.03B | 102.66 |
10 | 2.77 ± 0.33B | 119.39 | 1.10 ± 0.13B | 119.56 | 3.86 ± 0.46B | 119.44 | 2.52 ± 0.03A | 99.88 | |
20 | 2.35 ± 0.02A | 101.50 | 0.91 ± 0.01A | 98.75 | 3.26 ± 0.03A | 100.72 | 2.59 ± 0.00B | 102.79 |
图4 多氯联苯(PCBs)污染对大金发藓丙二醛(MDA)含量的影响(平均值±标准偏差)。
Fig. 4 Effects of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) contamination on the content of malondialdehyde (MDA) in Polyti- chum commune (mean ± SD).
图5 多氯联苯(PCBs)污染对大金发藓超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)活性(A)和谷胱甘肽(GSH)含量(B)的影响(平均值±标准偏差)。不同小写字母表示Aroclor 1242不同处理间差异显著(p < 0.05); 不同大写字母表示Aroclor 1254处理间差异显著(p < 0.05)。
Fig. 5 Effects of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) contamination on superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity (A) and glutathione (GSH) content (B) in Polytichum commune (mean ± SD). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different Aroclor 1242 treatments (p < 0.05). Different capital letters indicate significant differences among different Aroclor 1254 treatments (p < 0.05).
1 | Alkorta I, Garbisu C (2001). Phytoremediation of organic contaminants in soils.Bioresource Technology, 79, 273-276. |
2 | Chekol T, Vough LR, Chaney RL (2004). Phytoremediation of polychlorinated biphenyl-contaminated soils: The rhizos- phere effect.Environment International, 30, 799-804. |
3 | Dalla Valle M, Jurado E, Dachs J, Sweetman AJ, Jones KC (2005). The maximum reservoir capacity of soils for persistent organic pollutants: Implications for global cycling.Environmental Pollution, 134, 153-164. |
4 | Ding N, Hayat T, Wang J, Wang HZ, Liu XM, Xu JM (2011). Responses of microbial community in rhizosphere soils when ryegrass was subjected to stress from PCBs.Journal of Soils and Sediments, 11, 1355-1362. |
5 | Gao JF (2006). Experimental Guidance for Plant Physiology. Higher Education Press, Beijing. 210-211. (in Chinese) |
[高俊凤 (2006). 植物生理学实验指导. 高等教育出版社, 北京. 210-211.] | |
6 | Huang XD, El-Alawi Y, Penrose DM, Glick BR, Greenberg BM (2004). Responses of three grass species to creosote during phytoremediation.Environmental Pollution, 130, 453-463. |
7 | Jia Y, Bai XL, Shan FB, Bai SW, Zhong HR (2012). Experiment of artificially culturing moss crust and its maintenance mechanism.Journal of Desert Research, 32, 54-59. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[贾艳, 白学良, 单飞彪, 白少伟, 詹洪瑞 (2012). 藓类结皮层人工培养试验和维持机制研究. 中国沙漠, 32, 54-59.] | |
8 | Kauss PB, Hutchinson TC (1975). The effects of water-soluble petroleum components on the growth of Chlorella vulgaris Beijerinck.Environmental Pollution, 9, 157-174. |
9 | Li Y, Liang F, Zhu YF, Wang FP (2013). Phytoremediation of a PCB-contaminated soil by alfalfa and tall fescue single and mixed plants cultivation.Journal of Soils and Sediments, 13, 925-931. |
10 | Liu YY, Sun HB, Chen GZ (2006). Effects of polychlorinated biphenys on the growth of mangrove species, Aegiceras corniculatum.Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni, 45(9), 108-112. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[刘亚云, 孙红斌, 陈桂珠 (2006). 多氯联苯(PCBs)污染对桐花树幼苗生长的影响. 中山大学学报(自然科学版), 45(9), 108-112.] | |
11 | Liu YY, Sun HB, Chen GZ (2007a). Effects of PCBs on the growth of mangrove species, Kandelia candel.Marine Environmental Science, 26, 23-27. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[刘亚云, 孙红斌, 陈桂珠 (2007a). 多氯联苯(PCBs)污染对秋茄Kandelia candel生长的影响. 海洋环境科学, 26, 23-27.] | |
12 | Liu YY, Sun HB, Chen GZ, Zhao B, Li WY (2007b). Eco-physiological responses of Kandelia candel seedlings to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) treatment.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 27, 746-754. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[刘亚云, 孙红斌, 陈桂珠, 赵波, 李伟煜 (2007b). 秋茄(Kandelia candel)幼苗对多氯联苯污染的生理生态响应. 生态学报, 27, 746-754.] | |
13 | Maliszewska-Kordybach B, Smreczak B (2000). Ecotoxicological activity of soils polluted with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)—Effect on plants.Environmental Technology, 21, 1099-1110. |
14 | Ockenden WA, Breivik K, Meijer SN, Steinnes E, Sweetman AJ, Jones KC (2003). The global re-cycling of persistent organic pollutants is strongly retarded by soils.Environmental Pollution, 121, 75-80. |
15 | Qin H, Brookes PC, Xu JM (2014). Cucurbita spp. and Cucumis sativus enhance the dissipation of polychlorinated biphenyl congeners by stimulating soil microbial community development.Environmental Pollution, 184, 306-312. |
16 | Tian GQ, Bai XL, Xu J, Wang XD (2005). Experimental studies on natural regeneration and artificial cultures of moss crusts on fixed dunes in the Tengger Desert.Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 29, 164-169. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[田桂泉, 白学良, 徐杰, 王先道 (2005). 腾格里沙漠固定沙丘藓类植物结皮层的自然恢复及人工培养试验研究. 植物生态学报, 29, 164-169.] | |
17 | Tu C, Teng Y, Luo YM, Sun XH, Deng SP, Li ZG, Liu WX, Xu ZH (2011). PCB removal, soil enzyme activities, and microbial community structures during the phytoremediation by alfalfa in field soils.Journal of Soils and Sediments, 11, 649-656. |
18 | Weber JB, Mrozek E Jr (1979). Polychlorinated biphenyls: Phytotoxicity, absorption and translocation by plants, and inactivation by activated carbon.Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 23, 412-417. |
19 | Zeeb BA, Amphlett JS, Rutter A, Reimer KJ (2006). Potential for phytoremediation of polychlorinated biphenyl-(PCB)contaminated soil. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 8, 199-221. |
20 | Zhang XZ (1986). Plant chlorophyll content determination: Acetone ethanol mixture method.Journal of Liaoning Agricultural Sciences, (3), 26-28. (in Chinese) |
[张宪政 (1986). 植物叶绿素含量测定——丙酮乙醇混合液法. 辽宁农业科学, (3), 26-28.] | |
22 | Zhou JJ, Hu LL, Li M, Chen WF, Wang Y, Wang HC (2013). Effects of PCBs pollution on rape (Brassica campestris) growth and their accumulation in Brassica campestris.Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 32, 1959-1964. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[周佳佳, 胡林林, 李敏, 陈为峰, 王莹, 王海翠 (2013). 多氯联苯(PCBs)污染对油菜(Brassica campestris)生长的影响及积累效应研究. 农业环境科学学报, 32, 1959-1964.] | |
23 | Zhou QX, Cai Z, Zhang ZN, Liu WT (2011). Ecological remediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soils with weed plant.Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2, 97-105. |
24 | Zhou QX, Diao CY, Sun YB, Zhou JL (2012). Tolerance, uptake and removal of nitrobenzene by a newly-found remediation species Mirabilis jalapa L.Chemosphere, 86, 994-1000. |
25 | Zhou QX, Kong FX, Zhu L (2004). Ecotoxicology. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[周启星, 孔繁翔, 朱琳 (2004). 生态毒理学. 科学出版社, 北京.] | |
26 | Zhou QX, Luo Y (2011). Pollution Eco-chemistry. Science Press, Beijing. 30-35. (in Chinese) |
[周启星, 罗义 (2011). 污染生态化学. 科学出版社, 北京. 30-35.] | |
27 | Zhou QX, Wei SH, Diao CY (2007). Basic principles and researching progresses in ecological remediation of contaminated soils.Journal of Agro-environment Science, 26, 419-424. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[周启星, 魏树和, 刁春燕 (2007). 污染土壤生态修复基本原理及研究进展. 农业环境科学学报, 26, 419-424.] |
[1] | 李景, 王欣, 王振华, 王斌, 王成章, 邓美凤, 刘玲莉. 臭氧和气溶胶复合污染对杨树叶片光合作用的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(8): 854-863. |
[2] | 张娜, 朱阳春, 李志强, 卢信, 范如芹, 刘丽珠, 童非, 陈静, 穆春生, 张振华. 淹水和干旱生境下铅对芦苇生长、生物量分配和光合作用的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(2): 229-239. |
[3] | 陈良华, 赖娟, 胡相伟, 杨万勤, 张健, 王小军, 谭灵杰. 接种丛枝菌根真菌对受镉胁迫美洲黑杨雌、雄株光合生理的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(4): 480-488. |
[4] | 付登高, 何锋, 郭震, 阎凯, 吴晓妮, 段昌群. 滇池流域富磷区退化山地马桑-蔗茅植物群落的生态修复效能评价[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(4): 326-334. |
[5] | 朱治林,孙晓敏,赵风华,温学发,唐新斋,袁国富. 鲁西北平原冬小麦田臭氧浓度变化特征及对产量的潜在影响和机理分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(4): 313-323. |
[6] | 陈茂铨, 王根轩, 刘术新, 白燕远, 应俊辉, 陈兵红, 王东明. 合成革主要化学污染物对黄山松生理生态特性的浓度效应研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(1): 66-72. |
[7] | 许皓, 李彦, 谢静霞, 程磊, 赵彦, 刘冉. 光合有效辐射与地下水位变化对柽柳属荒漠灌木群落碳平衡的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(4): 375-386. |
[8] | 李剑, 马建华, 宋博. 郑汴路路旁土壤-小麦系统重金属积累及其健康风险评价[J]. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(3): 624-628. |
[9] | 龙新宪, 王艳红, 刘洪彦. 不同生态型东南景天对土壤中Cd的生长反应及吸收积累的差异性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(1): 168-175. |
[10] | 许宏, 杨景成, 陈圣宾, 蒋高明, 李永庚. 植物的臭氧污染胁迫效应研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2007, 31(6): 1205-1213. |
[11] | 任巍, 田汉勤. 臭氧污染与陆地生态系统生产力[J]. 植物生态学报, 2007, 31(2): 219-230. |
[12] | 马新明, 李春明, 袁祖丽, 熊淑萍. 铅污染对烤烟光合特性、产量及其品质的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(3): 472-478. |
[13] | 黎华寿, 张修玉, 曾祥有, 聂呈荣. 氯酸钾对花生生长的毒害效应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(1): 124-131. |
[14] | 代全林, 袁剑刚, 方炜, 杨中艺. 玉米各器官积累Pb能力的品种间差异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(6): 992-999. |
[15] | 刘鹏, 徐根娣, 郭水良, 汪敏. 南方4种草本植物对铝胁迫生理响应的研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(4): 644-651. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19