接种丛枝菌根真菌对受镉胁迫美洲黑杨雌、雄株光合生理的影响

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2016.0210

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

美洲黑杨(Populus deltoides)是长江中下游及江淮平原重要的造林树种, 目前广泛栽培的美洲黑杨既有雄株品系, 也有雌株品系。为了解镉(Cd)胁迫条件下美洲黑杨雌、雄株的耐受性差异, 采用盆栽实验, 研究Cd污染(10 mg·kg^-1)条件下美洲黑杨雌、雄株气体交换速率、CO₂响应曲线、叶绿素荧光参数、渗透调节能力、激素含量的响应特征, 以及接种丛枝菌根真菌(Rhizophagus intraradices)对受Cd胁迫美洲黑杨雌、雄株的生理效应。结果表明: (1) Cd胁迫下, 美洲黑杨雌、雄株净光合速率、气孔导度、胞间CO₂浓度、蒸腾速率、光系统II (PSII)最大光化学量子产量、PSII有效光化学量子产量、光化学淬灭系数、最大羧化速率、最大电子传递速率、磷酸丙糖利用速率均不同程度降低, 雌株的下降幅度更大, 接种丛枝菌根真菌的雌株的以上参数有了不同程度的恢复, 但对雄株没有明显影响; (2) Cd胁迫下, 美洲黑杨雌雄株的脯氨酸含量均显著增加, 接种丛枝菌根真菌进一步提高了雌株的脯氨酸含量; (3) Cd胁迫下, 美洲黑杨雌、雄株叶片生长素含量下降, 脱落酸含量增加, 雌株的变化幅度更大, 接种丛枝菌根真菌有利于恢复雌株激素的平衡。由此可见, 与雄株相比, Cd胁迫对美洲黑杨雌株气体交换速率和碳固定能力的负面影响更大, 植株光合机构受损更严重, 激素平衡更易受到影响, 表现出更弱的胁迫耐受性; 接种丛枝菌根真菌有利于增强美洲黑杨雌株的渗透调节能力并在一定程度上恢复雌株的固碳能力和激素平衡, 但菌根对雄株的效应并不显著。

关键词: 丛枝菌根, 美洲黑杨, 镉污染, 雌雄异株, 光合作用

Abstract:

Aims Populus deltoides is an important plantation tree species in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River and in Huai River Plain. The extensively cultivated varieties are consisted of both females and males of P. deltoides. The objective of this paper was to characterize the difference in cadmium (Cd) tolerance between the sexes and the effects of symbiosis with Rhizophagus intraradices on their Cd tolerance.
Methods The experiment was carried out under semi-controlled conditions in a natural light greenhouse, protected from rain. Rhizophagus intraradices was inoculated on roots of both females and males when transplanting to a sand culture substrate. After one month, half of cuttings were exposed to Cd pollution (10 mg·kg^-1). All cuttings were irrigated with sterile water to avoid infection by other microorganism. About three months later, the gas exchange rate, net photosynthesis rate (P_n)-intercellular CO₂ concentration (C_i) curve, chlorophyll fluorescence, osmotic adjustment and phytohormone content of both females and males of P. deltoides were measured.
Important findings Our main results are as follows: (1) when compared to the controls, decreases in P_n, stomatal conductance, C_i, transpiration rate, maximum photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (PSII), effective quantum yield of PSII, photo-chemical quenching coefficient, maximum rate of carboxylation of Rubisco, photosynthetically active radiation-saturated rate of electron transport and rate of triose phosphate utilization to a different degree in both sexes of P. deltoides under Cd pollution were found, and females exhibited a greater decrease in such parameters than males. Rhizophagus intraradices inoculation mitigated the toxic effect of Cd on such parameters to a different degree in females, not in males. (2) Under Cd pollution, there was an increase in proline content in both sexes when compared to the controls. A further increase in proline content occurred in females, not in males, when inoculated with R. intraradices. (3) When compared to the controls, there was a decrease in indoleacetic acid, but an increase in abscisic acid in leaves of both sexes when exposed to Cd pollution. The amplitude changed in both phytohormones in females was greater than that in males. Rhizophagus intraradices inoculation was helpful for recovery of phytohormone balance in females, which was not observed in males. Therefore, our results indicated that (1) there were a greater negative effect exerted by Cd pollution on gas exchange rate, carbon fixation capacity and phytohormone balance and a more impairment of photosynthetic apparatus in females when compared to males, showing a less tolerance to stress conditions in females; (2) Rhizophagus intraradices inoculation could enhance the osmotic adjustment capacity in females, thus mitigate the negative effect of Cd stress on ability of carbon fixation and phytohormone balance in females. However, such positive effects derived from R. intraradices symbiosis were not observed in males.

Key words: vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza, Populus deltoides, cadmium pollution, dioecy, photosynthesis

陈良华, 赖娟, 胡相伟, 杨万勤, 张健, 王小军, 谭灵杰. 接种丛枝菌根真菌对受镉胁迫美洲黑杨雌、雄株光合生理的影响. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(4): 480-488. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0210

Liang-Hua CHEN, Juan LAI, Xiang-Wei HU, Wan-Qin YANG, Jian ZHANG, Xiao-Jun WANG, Ling-Jie TAN. Effects of inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on photosynthetic physiology in females and males of Populus deltoides exposed to cadmium pollution. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2017, 41(4): 480-488. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0210

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2016.0210

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2017/V41/I4/480

图/表 6

参考文献 33

[1]	Ali B, Qian P, Jin R, Ali S, Khan M, Aziz R, Tian T, Zhou W (2014). Physiological and ultra-structural changes in Brassica napus seedlings induced by cadmium stress. Biologia Plantarum, 58, 131-138.
[2]	Benavides MP, Gallego SM, Tomaro ML (2005). Cadmium toxicity in plants.Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology, 17, 21-34.
[3]	Björkman O, Demmig B (1987). Photon yield of O2 evolution and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics at 77 K among vascular plants of diverse origins.Planta, 170, 489-504.
[4]	Burzyński M, Kłobus G (2004). Changes of photosynthetic parameters in cucumber leaves under Cu, Cd, and Pb stress.Photosynthetica, 42, 505-510.
[5]	Cao L, Wang QC, Cui DH (2006). Impact of soil cadmium contamination on chlorophyll fluorescence characters and biomass accumulation of four broad-leaved tree species seedlings.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 17, 769-772. (in Chinese with English abstract)[曹玲, 王庆成, 崔东海 (2006). 土壤镉污染对四种阔叶树苗木叶绿素荧光特性和生长的影响. 应用生态学报, 17, 769-772.]
[6]	Chen LH, Han Y, Jiang H, Korpelainen H, Li CY (2011). Nitrogen nutrient status induces sexual differences in responses to cadmium in Populus yunnanensis. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62, 5037-5050.
[7]	Chen LH, Hu XW, Yang WQ, Xu ZF, Zhang DJ, Gao S (2015). The effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on sex-specific responses to Pb pollution in Populus cathayana. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 113, 460-468.
[8]	Chen LH, Zhang DJ, Yang WQ, Liu Y, Zhang L, Gao S (2016). Sex-specific responses of Populus deltoides to Glomus intraradices colonization and Cd pollution. Chemosphere, 155, 196-206.
[9]	Chen LH, Zhang L, Tu LH, Xu ZF, Zhang J, Gao S (2014). Sex-related differences in physiological and ultrastructural responses of Populus cathayana to Ni toxicity. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 36, 1937-1946.
[10]	Cocozza C, Trupiano D, Lustrato G, Alfano G, Vitullo D, Falasca A, Lomaglio T, de Felice V, Lima G, Ranalli G, Scippa S, Tognetti R (2015). Challenging synergistic activity of poplar-bacteria association for the Cd phytostabilization.Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22, 19546-19561.
[11]	DalCorso G, Farinati S, Maistri S, Furini A (2008). How plants cope with cadmium: Staking all on metabolism and gene expression.Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 50, 1268-1280.
[12]	Farooq MA, Ali S, Hameed A, Ishaque W, Mahmood K, Iqbal Z (2013). Alleviation of cadmium toxicity by silicon is related to elevated photosynthesis, antioxidant enzymes; suppressed cadmium uptake and oxidative stress in cotton.Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 96, 242-249.
[13]	Farquhar GD, Von SV, Berry JA (1980). A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species.Planta, 149, 78-90.
[14]	Gómez-Cadenas A, Vives V, Zandalinas SI, Manzi M, Sánchez-Pérez AM, Pérez-Clemente RM, Arbona V (2015). Abscisic acid: A versatile phytohormone in plant signaling and beyond.Current Protein and Peptide Science, 16, 413-434.
[15]	Hayward AR, Coates KE, Galer AL, Hutchinson TC, Emery RN (2013). Chelator profiling in Deschampsia cespitosa(L.) Beauv. reveals a Ni reaction, which is distinct from the ABA and cytokinin associated response to Cd. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 64, 84-91.
[16]	Huang J, Ling WT, Sun YD, Liu J (2012). Impacts of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation on the uptake of cadmium and zinc by Alfalfa in contaminated soil. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 31, 99-105. (in Chinese with English abstract)[黄晶, 凌婉婷, 孙艳娣, 刘娟 (2012). 丛枝菌根真菌对紫花苜蓿吸收土壤中镉和锌的影响. 农业环境科学学报, 31, 99-105.]
[17]	Küpper H, Parameswaran A, Leitenmaier B, Trtílek M, Šetlík I (2007). Cadmium-induced inhibition of photosynthesis and long-term acclimation to cadmium stress in the hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens. New Phytologist, 175, 655-674.
[18]	Li DJ, Mo JM, Fang YT, Jiang YQ (2004). Ecophysiological responses of woody plants to elevated nitrogen deposition.Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 12, 482-488. (in Chinese with English abstract)[李德军, 莫江明, 方运霆, 江远清 (2004). 木本植物对高氮沉降的生理生态响应. 热带亚热带植物学报, 12, 482-488.]
[19]	Li YL, Jin ZX, Li JM, Guo SM, Guan M (2015). Effects of soil microbe inoculation on the growth and photosynthetic physiology of Elsholtzia splendens under copper stress. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35, 3926-3937. (in Chinese with English abstract)[李月灵, 金则新, 李钧敏, 郭素民, 管铭 (2015). 接种土壤微生物对铜胁迫下海州香薷生长及光合生理的影响. 生态学报, 35, 3926-3937.]
[20]	Loth-Pereda V, Orsini E, Courty PE, Lota F, Kohler A, Diss L, Blaudez D, Chalot M, Nehls U, Bucher M, Martin F (2011). Structure and expression profile of the phosphate Pht1 transporter gene family in mycorrhizal Populus trichocarpa. Plant Physiology, 156, 2141-2154.
[21]	Ma HY (2007). Changes of Endogenous Hormones in Grapevine During Its Development. Master degree dissertation, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling, Shaanxi. (in Chinese with English abstract)[马海燕 (2007). 葡萄生长过程中内源激素含量变化的研究. 硕士学位论文, 西北农林科技大学, 陕西杨凌.]
[22]	Pallara G, Todeschini V, Lingua G, Camussi A, Racchi ML (2013). Transcript analysis of stress defence genes in a white poplar clone inoculated with the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae and grown on a polluted soil. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 63, 131-139.
[23]	Pantin F, Monnet F, Jannaud D, Costa JM, Renaud J, Muller B, Simonneau T, Genty B (2013). The dual effect of abscisic acid on stomata.New Phytologist, 197, 65-72.
[24]	Pereira MP, de Almeida Rodrigues LC, Corrêa FF, de Castro EM, Ribeiro VE, Pereira FJ (2016). Cadmium tolerance in Schinus molle trees is modulated by enhanced leaf anatomy and photosynthesis. Trees, 30, 807-814.
[25]	Prusty R, Grisafi P, Fink GR (2004). The plant hormone indoleacetic acid induces invasive growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 4153-4157.
[26]	Ran Q, Zhong ZC (2015). Effect of AMF on the photosynthetic characteristics and growth of maize seedlings under the stress of drought, high calcium and their combination in karst area.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35, 460-467. (in Chinese with English abstract)[冉琼, 钟章成 (2015). 模拟岩溶旱钙土壤基质中AM真菌对玉米幼苗光合生长的影响. 生态学报, 35, 460-467.]
[27]	Rozpądek P, Wężowicz K, Nosek M, Ważny R, Tokarz K, Lembicz M, Miszalski Z, Turnau K (2015). The fungal endophyteEpichloë typhina improves photosynthesis efficiency of its host orchard grass(Dactylis glomerata). Planta, 242, 1025-1035.
[28]	Sanità di Toppi L, Gabbrielli R (1999). Response to cadmium in higher plants.Environmental and Experimental Botany, 41, 105-130.
[29]	Smirnoff N, Cumbes QJ (1989). Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of compatible solutes.Phytochemistry, 28, 1057-1060.
[30]	Stroiński A, Giżewska K, Zielezińska M (2013). Abscisic acid is required in transduction of cadmium signal to potato roots.Biologia Plantarum, 57, 121-127.
[31]	Wang SZ, Jin ZX, Li YL, Gu YF (2015). Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation on the photosynthetic pigment contents, anti-oxidation capacity and membrane lipid peroxidation of Elsholtzia splendens leaves under copper stress. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35, 7699-7708. (in Chinese with English abstract)[王穗子, 金则新, 李月灵, 谷银芳 (2015). 铜胁迫条件下AMF对海州香薷光合色素含量、抗氧化能力和膜脂过氧化的影响. 生态学报, 35, 7699-7708.]
[32]	Xu X, Peng GQ, Wu CC, Korpelainen H, Li CY (2008). Drought inhibits photosynthetic capacity more in females than in males of Populus cathayana. Tree Physiology, 28, 1751-1759.
[33]	Zhao HX, Li Y, Duan BL, Korpelainen H, Li CY (2009). Sex-related adaptive responses of Populus cathayana to photoperiod transitions. Plant, Cell & Environment, 32, 1401-1411.

处理 Treatment	丛枝菌根 AM	性别 Sex	净光合速率 P_n(µmol·m^-2·s^-1)	气孔导度 G_s (mol·m^-2·s^-1)	胞间CO₂浓度 C_i (µmol·mol^-1)	蒸腾速率 T_r (mmol·m^-2·s^-1)
对照	-	雄株 Male	11.91 ± 0.26^b	0.37 ± 0.04^bcd	318.40 ± 10.05^a	4.37 ± 0.27^ab
Control	-	雌株 Female	13.68 ± 0.79^ab	0.51 ± 0.02^ab	310.85 ± 7.71^ab	5.50 ± 0.27^a
	+	雄株 Male	12.34 ± 0.34^b	0.41 ± 0.03^abc	313.96 ± 7.72^ab	5.11 ± 0.20^a
	+	雌株 Female	14.43 ± 0.42^a	0.52 ± 0.05^a	313.68 ± 10.97^ab	5.37 ± 0.44^a
Cd污染	-	雄株 Male	9.70 ± 0.46^c	0.25 ± 0.02^de	270.87 ± 6.51^bc	3.48 ± 0.26^bc
Cd pollution	-	雌株 Female	6.58 ± 0.27^d	0.13 ± 0.02^e	243.14 ± 9.73^c	2.10 ± 0.33^d
	+	雄株 Male	8.86 ± 0.35^c	0.27 ± 0.02^d	273.86 ± 9.00^bc	2.95 ± 0.26^cd
	+	雌株 Female	9.59 ± 0.28^c	0.30 ± 0.01^cd	288.10 ± 4.52^ab	3.26 ± 0.11^bcd
F_s			ns	ns	ns	ns
F_cd			***	***	***	***
F_AMF			*	**	ns	ns
F_s×cd			***	***	ns	**
F_s×AMF			**	ns	*	ns
F_cd×AMF			ns	ns	ns	ns
F_s×cd×AMF			**	*	ns	**

处理 Treatment	丛枝菌根 AM	性别 Sex	净光合速率 P_n(µmol·m^-2·s^-1)	气孔导度 G_s (mol·m^-2·s^-1)	胞间CO₂浓度 C_i (µmol·mol^-1)	蒸腾速率 T_r (mmol·m^-2·s^-1)
对照	-	雄株 Male	11.91 ± 0.26^b	0.37 ± 0.04^bcd	318.40 ± 10.05^a	4.37 ± 0.27^ab
Control	-	雌株 Female	13.68 ± 0.79^ab	0.51 ± 0.02^ab	310.85 ± 7.71^ab	5.50 ± 0.27^a
	+	雄株 Male	12.34 ± 0.34^b	0.41 ± 0.03^abc	313.96 ± 7.72^ab	5.11 ± 0.20^a
	+	雌株 Female	14.43 ± 0.42^a	0.52 ± 0.05^a	313.68 ± 10.97^ab	5.37 ± 0.44^a
Cd污染	-	雄株 Male	9.70 ± 0.46^c	0.25 ± 0.02^de	270.87 ± 6.51^bc	3.48 ± 0.26^bc
Cd pollution	-	雌株 Female	6.58 ± 0.27^d	0.13 ± 0.02^e	243.14 ± 9.73^c	2.10 ± 0.33^d
	+	雄株 Male	8.86 ± 0.35^c	0.27 ± 0.02^d	273.86 ± 9.00^bc	2.95 ± 0.26^cd
	+	雌株 Female	9.59 ± 0.28^c	0.30 ± 0.01^cd	288.10 ± 4.52^ab	3.26 ± 0.11^bcd
F_s			ns	ns	ns	ns
F_cd			***	***	***	***
F_AMF			*	**	ns	ns
F_s×cd			***	***	ns	**
F_s×AMF			**	ns	*	ns
F_cd×AMF			ns	ns	ns	ns
F_s×cd×AMF			**	*	ns	**

处理 Treatment	丛枝菌根 AM	性别 Sex	最大羧化速率 V_cmax (µmol·m^-2·s^-1)	最大电子传递速率 J_max (µmol·m^-2·s^-1)	磷酸丙糖利用率 TPU (µmol·m^-2·s^-1)	CO₂补偿点 Г (µmol·mol^-1)
对照	-	雄株 Male	34.17 ± 1.14^bc	88.20 ± 1.80^bc	6.26 ± 0.14^abcd	6.20 ± 0.36^b
Control	-	雌株 Female	37.80 ± 0.17^b	93.60 ± 3.38^b	7.91 ± 0.64^abc	6.10 ± 0.21^b
	+	雄株 Male	42.57 ± 1.34^b	117.33 ± 6.77^a	8.88 ± 0.95^a	5.57 ± 0.08^b
	+	雌株 Female	52.30 ± 3.13^a	137.33 ± 5.78^a	8.24 ± 0.63^ab	5.34 ± 0.12^b
Cd 污染	-	雄株 Male	25.87 ± 2.39^cd	71.20 ± 2.72^cd	4.17 ± 0.27^d	6.87 ± 0.28^b
Cd pollution	-	雌株 Female	22.67 ± 1.36^d	59.50 ± 3.50^d	5.19 ± 0.41^bcd	9.91 ± 0.46^a
	+	雄株 Male	24.17 ± 2.81^d	68.97 ± 4.34^cd	4.68 ± 0.45^cd	6.08 ± 0.20^b
	+	雌株 Female	25.30 ± 1.03^cd	73.23 ± 4.52^bcd	6.54 ± 1.22^abcd	7.02 ± 0.38^b
F_s			ns	ns	ns	ns
F_cd			***	***	***	***
F_AMF			***	***	*	ns
F_s×cd			**	*	*	ns
F_s×AMF			ns	*	ns	**
F_cd×AMF			***	***	ns	**
F_s×cd×AMF			ns	ns	ns	**

处理 Treatment	丛枝菌根 AM	性别 Sex	最大羧化速率 V_cmax (µmol·m^-2·s^-1)	最大电子传递速率 J_max (µmol·m^-2·s^-1)	磷酸丙糖利用率 TPU (µmol·m^-2·s^-1)	CO₂补偿点 Г (µmol·mol^-1)
对照	-	雄株 Male	34.17 ± 1.14^bc	88.20 ± 1.80^bc	6.26 ± 0.14^abcd	6.20 ± 0.36^b
Control	-	雌株 Female	37.80 ± 0.17^b	93.60 ± 3.38^b	7.91 ± 0.64^abc	6.10 ± 0.21^b
	+	雄株 Male	42.57 ± 1.34^b	117.33 ± 6.77^a	8.88 ± 0.95^a	5.57 ± 0.08^b
	+	雌株 Female	52.30 ± 3.13^a	137.33 ± 5.78^a	8.24 ± 0.63^ab	5.34 ± 0.12^b
Cd 污染	-	雄株 Male	25.87 ± 2.39^cd	71.20 ± 2.72^cd	4.17 ± 0.27^d	6.87 ± 0.28^b
Cd pollution	-	雌株 Female	22.67 ± 1.36^d	59.50 ± 3.50^d	5.19 ± 0.41^bcd	9.91 ± 0.46^a
	+	雄株 Male	24.17 ± 2.81^d	68.97 ± 4.34^cd	4.68 ± 0.45^cd	6.08 ± 0.20^b
	+	雌株 Female	25.30 ± 1.03^cd	73.23 ± 4.52^bcd	6.54 ± 1.22^abcd	7.02 ± 0.38^b
F_s			ns	ns	ns	ns
F_cd			***	***	***	***
F_AMF			***	***	*	ns
F_s×cd			**	*	*	ns
F_s×AMF			ns	*	ns	**
F_cd×AMF			***	***	ns	**
F_s×cd×AMF			ns	ns	ns	**

处理 Treatment	丛枝菌根 AM	性别 Sex	F_v/F_m	Φ_PSII	q_P	q_N
对照	-	雄株 Male	0.80 ± 0.01^ab	0.72 ± 0.01^a	0.94 ± 0.01^a	0.19 ± 0.01^cd
Control	-	雌株 Female	0.81 ± 0.01^ab	0.73 ± 0.00^a	0.96 ± 0.00^a	0.19 ± 0.01^cd
	+	雄株 Male	0.81 ± 0.00^ab	0.73 ± 0.00^a	0.94 ± 0.01^a	0.24 ± 0.01^bc
	+	雌株 Female	0.81 ± 0.00^ab	0.73 ± 0.00^a	0.93 ± 0.01^a	0.17 ± 0.01^d
Cd 污染	-	雄株 Male	0.78 ± 0.00^bc	0.70 ± 0.01^a	0.93 ± 0.01^a	0.21 ± 0.01^cd
Cd pollution	-	雌株 Female	0.69 ± 0.01^e	0.60 ± 0.02^b	0.83 ± 0.01^b	0.33 ± 0.01^a
	+	雄株 Male	0.76 ± 0.00^cd	0.70 ± 0.01^a	0.92 ± 0.01^a	0.26 ± 0.01^b
	+	雌株 Female	0.76 ± 0.01^d	0.70 ± 0.02^a	0.93 ± 0.02^a	0.26 ± 0.01^b
F_s			***	**	**	ns
F_cd			***	***	***	***
F_AMF			***	**	ns	ns
F_s×cd			***	***	**	***
F_s×AMF			***	*	**	***
F_cd×AMF			ns	*	***	ns
F_s×cd×AMF			***	**	***	ns