星毛委陵菜根系构型对草原退化的生态适应

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00490

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

对轻度、中度、重度和极度退化的草原群落中星毛委陵菜(Potentilla acaulis)根系构型参数及相应的土壤水分、容重和硬度等指标进行了分析, 以研究星毛委陵菜根系构型对草原退化的生态适应性。结果表明: 1)在以大针茅(Stipa grandis)为建群种的典型草原中, 随着退化程度的加剧, 星毛委陵菜在群落中的作用逐渐增强, 其根幅、根深、一级垂向根数、分蘖子株数和水平分蘖根长度显著增加; 2)根表面积、二级侧根长度、总根长和根分叉数4个根系构型参数是解释星毛委陵菜根系构型对草原退化生态适应的首选指标, 解释力依次减小, 累计贡献率为92.34%; 3)直径2 mm以下的根系对单株系星毛委陵菜的根表面积和总根长影响显著; 4)阔腰倒锥体三维根系构型是星毛委陵菜适应草原退化并使之成为建群种的优势构型。

关键词: 阔腰倒锥体, 生态适应, 草原退化, 星毛委陵菜, 根系构型, 根系构型参数

Abstract:

Aims Our objectives were to 1) examine the ecological adaptability of Potentilla acaulis to grassland degradation from the perspective of root architecture, 2) reveal why it can be a dominant species in extremely degraded grassland and 3) discuss its important roles in vegetation restoration or succession and preventing grassland from desertification.

Methods We collected relatively complete P. acaulis roots by trenching. The numbers of first vertical roots, length of horizontal root tillering and number of plant tillers were recorded in the field. The root analysis system of WinRHIZO was used to determine total root length, root surface area, total root volume, root average diameter, number of furcations, average branching angle, number of root axes, length of root axes, number of root tips, number of first lateral roots, length of first lateral roots, number of secondary lateral roots, length of secondary lateral roots, root diameters along root length, root surface area and root volume. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and principal component analysis.

Important findings In degraded grassland typified by Stipa grandis, the function of P. acaulis became more important in the community and its root range, root depth, the number of first vertical roots, the number of plant tillers and the length of horizontal root tillering increased significantly. The parameters of root surface area, length of secondary lateral roots, total root length and the number of furcations explained the adaptability of P. acaulis to grassland degradation. Roots with a diameter <2 mm had a significant effect on root surface area and total root length of single plants of P. acaulis. The three-dimensional root architecture of a broad-waist-inverted centrum was an advantageous configuration for P. acaulis to adapt for grassland degradation and can explain P. acaulis as a constructive species in extremely degraded grassland.

Key words: broad-waist-inverted centrum, ecological adaptation, grassland degradation, Potentilla acaulis, root architecture, root architecture parameter

周艳松, 王立群. 星毛委陵菜根系构型对草原退化的生态适应. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(5): 490-499. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00490

ZHOU Yan-Song, WANG Li-Qun. Ecological adaptation of root architecture to grassland degradation in Potentilla acaulis. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2011, 35(5): 490-499. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00490

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00490

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2011/V35/I5/490

图/表 8

参考文献 43

[1]	Bates TR, Lynch JP (2000). Plant growth and phosphorus accumulation of wild-type and two root hair mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany, 87, 958-963. URL PMID
[2]	Berndtsson R, Chen HS (1994). Variability of soil water content along a transect in a desert area. Journal of Arid Environments, 27, 127-139. DOI URL
[3]	Böhm W (1979). Methods of studying root systems. In: Billing WD, Golley F, Lange OL, Olson JS eds. Ecological Studies. Springer, Berlin, 188.
[4]	Chen SH (陈世鍠), Hua YS (华永胜) (1991). Preliminary research on creeping-rooted plant of grassland. Journal of Grassland Inner Mongolia (内蒙古草业), 1, 25-28. (in Chinese)
[5]	Chen SH (陈世鍠), Zhang H (张昊), Wang LQ (王立群), Zhan BL (占布拉), Zhao ML (赵萌丽) (2001). Plant Roots of Grassland in Northern China (中国北方草地植物根系). Jilin University Press, Changchun. (in Chinese)
[6]	Cheng YF, Dai XH, Zhao YD (2007). Auxin synthesized by the YUCCA flavin monooxygenases is essential for embryogenesis and leaf formation in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 19, 2430-2439. DOI URL PMID
[7]	Coppin NJ, Richards IJ (1990). Use of Vegetation in Civil Engineering. CIRIA, Butterworths.
[8]	Coutts MP (1983). Root architecture and tree stability. Plant and Soil, 71, 171-188.
[9]	Danjon F, Bert D, Godin C, Trichet P (1999). Structural root architecture of 5-year-old Pinus pinaster measured by 3D digitising and analysed with AMAPmod. Plant and Soil, 217, 49-63. DOI URL
[10]	Dong M (董鸣) (1996). Clonal growth in plants in relation to resource heterogeneity: foraging behavior. Acta Botanica Sinica (植物学报), 38, 828-835. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	Drexhage M, Chauvière M, Colin F, Nielsen CNN (1999). Development of structural root architecture and allometry of Quercus petraea. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 29, 600-608.
[12]	Feng X (冯秀), Tong C (仝川), Zhang L (张鲁), Miao BL (苗百岭), Ding Y (丁勇), Zhang YM (张远鸣) (2006). Assessment on grassland degradation at regional-scale in the Baiyinxile Ranch, Inner Mongolia. Journal of Natural Resources (自然资源学报), 21, 575-583. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	Gupta SC, Sharma PP, DeFranchi SA (1989). Compaction effects on soil structure. Advances in Agronomy, 42, 311-338.
[14]	Henderson R, Ford ED, Renshaw E (1983). Morphology of the structural root system of Sitka spruce 2. Computer simulation of rooting pattern. Forestry, 56, 137-153.
[15]	Jin Y (晋瑜), Pan CD (潘存德), Wang M (王梅), Wan M (万猛) (2005). Plant community species diversity and comparison of its indices in arid desert land. Arid Land Geography (干旱区地理), 28, 113-119. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	Leyser O (2006). Dynamic integration of auxin transport and signaling. Current Biology, 16, R424-R433. URL PMID
[17]	Li DS (李德生), Liu WB (刘文彬), Xu MN (许慕农) (1993). A study on water and soil conversation benefits of vegetation in limestone mountain area. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (水土保持学报), 7(2), 57-62. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	Li JH (李金花), Li ZQ (李镇清) (2002). Clonal morphological plasticity and biomass allocation pattern of Artemisia frigida and Potentilla acaulis under different grazing intensity. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 26, 435-440. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	Li YH (李永宏) (1994). Research on the grazing degradation model of the main steppe rangelands in Inner Mongolia and some considerations for the establishment of a computerized rangeland monitoring system. Acta Phytoecolo- gica Sinica (植物生态学报), 18, 68-79. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	Liu DH (刘定辉), Li Y (李勇) (2003). Mechanism of plant roots improving resistance of soil to concentrated flow erosion. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (水土保持学报), 17(3), 34-37. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	Liu WG (刘晚苟), Shan L (山仑) (2003). Effect of soil bulk density on maize growth under different water regimes. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 14, 1906-1910. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	Lynch J (1995). Root architecture and plant productivity. Plant Physiology, 109, 7-13. DOI URL PMID
[23]	Mao QZ (毛齐正), Yang XT (杨喜田), Miao L (苗蕾) (2008). The ecological roles and influencing factors of plant root architecture. Henan Science (河南科学), 26, 172-176. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	McMinn RG (1963). Characteristics of Douglas-fir root systems. Canadian Journal of Botany, 41, 105-122.
[25]	Mouchel CF, Briggs GC, Hardtke CS (2004). Natural genetic variation in Arabidopsis identifies BREVIS RADIX, a novel regulator of cell proliferation and elongation in the root. Genes Development, 18, 700-714. URL PMID
[26]	Norris JE, Stokes A, Mickovski SB, Cammeraat E, van Beek R, Nicoll BC, Achim A (2008). Slope Stability and Erosion Control: Ecotechnological Solutions. Springer Dordrecht.
[27]	Oppelt AL, Kurth W, Dzierzon H, Jentschke G, Godbold DL (2000). Structure and fractal dimensions of root systems of four co-occurring fruit tree species from Botswana. Annals of Forest Science, 57, 463-475.
[28]	Pagès L (1999a). Root system architecture: from its representation to the study of its elaboration. Agronomie, 19, 295-304.
[29]	Pagès L (1999b). Why model root system architecture? In: Stokes A ed. Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences. Kluwer, Dordrecht. 187-194.
[30]	Pagès L (2002). Modelling root system architecture. In: Weisel Y, Eshel A, Kafkafi U eds. Plant Roots: The Hidden Half 3rd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York. 175-186.
[31]	Pagès L, Asseng S, Pellerin S, Diggle A (2000). Modelling root system growth and architecture. In: Smit AL ed. Root Methods: A Handbook. Springer, Berlin. 113-146.
[32]	Song YC (宋永昌) (2001). Vegetation Ecology (植被生态学). East China Normal University Press, Shanghai, 47-51. (in Chinese)
[33]	Staswick PE, Serban B, Rowe M, Tiryaki I, Maldonado MT, Maldonado MC, Suza W (2005). Characterization of an Arabidopsis enzyme family that conjugates amino acids to indole-3-acetic acid. The Plant Cell, 17, 616-627. DOI URL PMID
[34]	Sun RY (孙儒泳), Li B (李博), Zhuge Y (诸葛阳), Shang YC (尚玉昌) (1993). General Ecology (普通生态学). China Higher Education Press, Beijing, 135-137. (in Chinese)
[35]	Tsakaldimi M, Tsitsoni T, Ganatsas P, Zagas T (2009). A comparison of root architecture and shoot morphology between naturally regenerated and container-grown seedlings of Quercus ilex. Plant and Soil, 324, 103-113.
[36]	Wang K (王库) (2001). Effects of plant roots on soil anti- erosion. Soil and Environmental Sciences (土壤与环境), 10, 250-252. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[37]	Wang LQ (王立群), Chen SH (陈世鍠) (2003). Study on the principle of dividing root system type of lawn plant. Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University (内蒙古农业大学学报), 24(3), 11-13. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[38]	Wang SP (汪诗平), Li YH (李永宏) (1999). Degradation mechanism of typical grassland in Inner Mongolia. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 10, 437-441. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[39]	Wu Y (吴彦), Liu SQ (刘世全), Wang JX (王金锡) (1997). Effect of plant root system on soil anti-erosion. Chinese Journal of Applications and Environmental Biology (应用与环境生物学报), 3, 119-124. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[40]	Yu XZ (于向芝), He X (贺晓), Zhang T (张韬), Wang W (王炜) (2007). Response of leaf structures of 8 plants to grazing prohibition in degraded grassland of Inner Mongolia. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 27, 1638-1645. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[41]	Zhang TH (张铜会), Zhao HL (赵哈林), Toshiya O (大黑俊哉), Yasuhito S (白户康人) (2003). Soil characteristics and spatial pattern of vegetation after successive grazing in Horqin Sandy Land, Inner Mongolia. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment (干旱区资源与环境), 17(4), 117-121. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[42]	Zhao W (赵玮), Zhang TH (张铜会), Liu XP (刘新平), Wang SK (王少昆), Luo YY (罗亚勇) (2008). Spatiotemporal variation of soil moisture and its relations with Artemisia halodendron root water content as affected by rainfall. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 27, 151-156. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[43]	Zhao XY (赵雪艳), Wang SP (汪诗平) (2009). Responses of the anatomical characteristics of plant leaf to long-term grazing under different stocking rates in Inner Mongolia steppe. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 29, 2906-2918. (in Chinese with English abstract)

退化群落 Degraded community	平均盖度 Average coverage (%)	地上生物量 Aboveground biomass (g·m^-2)	建群种 Constructive species	放牧率 Stocking rate (sheep·hm^-2)
轻度退化 Light degradation (L)	92.6	159.21	大针茅 Stipa grandis	1.33
中度退化 Moderate degradation (M)	93.0	81.00	大针茅 Stipa grandis	4.00
重度退化 Heavy degradation (H)	71.2	79.74	冷蒿 Artemisia frigida	6.67
极度退化 Extreme degradation (E)	67.7	57.02	星毛委陵菜 Potentilla acaulis	8.00

退化群落 Degraded community	平均盖度 Average coverage (%)	地上生物量 Aboveground biomass (g·m^-2)	建群种 Constructive species	放牧率 Stocking rate (sheep·hm^-2)
轻度退化 Light degradation (L)	92.6	159.21	大针茅 Stipa grandis	1.33
中度退化 Moderate degradation (M)	93.0	81.00	大针茅 Stipa grandis	4.00
重度退化 Heavy degradation (H)	71.2	79.74	冷蒿 Artemisia frigida	6.67
极度退化 Extreme degradation (E)	67.7	57.02	星毛委陵菜 Potentilla acaulis	8.00

退化群落 Degraded community	相对优势度 Relative dominance	重要值 Important value	Simpson优势度指数 Simpson dominance index	Simpson多样性指数 Simpson diversity index	Pielou均匀度指数 Pielou evenness index
轻度退化 L	0.039^d	0.102^d	0.180	0.820	0.864
中度退化 M	0.042^c	0.122^c	0.129	0.871	0.913
重度退化 H	0.044^b	0.142^b	0.182	0.818	0.861
极度退化 E	0.123^a	0.444^a	0.146	0.854	0.893

退化群落 Degraded community	相对优势度 Relative dominance	重要值 Important value	Simpson优势度指数 Simpson dominance index	Simpson多样性指数 Simpson diversity index	Pielou均匀度指数 Pielou evenness index
轻度退化 L	0.039^d	0.102^d	0.180	0.820	0.864
中度退化 M	0.042^c	0.122^c	0.129	0.871	0.913
重度退化 H	0.044^b	0.142^b	0.182	0.818	0.861
极度退化 E	0.123^a	0.444^a	0.146	0.854	0.893

退化群落 Degraded community	冠幅(长×宽) Crown width (length × width) (cm²)	根幅(长×宽) Root range (length × width) (cm² )	根深 Root depth (cm· individual^-1)	一级垂向根条数 Number of first vertical root (No.· individual^-1)	分蘖子株数 Number of plant tillers (No.· individual^-1)	水平分蘖根长度 Length of horizontal root tillering (cm·individual^-1)	地下生物量 Underground biomass (g·individual^-1)
轻度退化 L	535.2^c (23.1 × 23.1)	1392.4^c (37.3 × 37.3)	48.2^c	10^b	3^c	2.0^b	0.6^c
中度退化 M	341.6^bc(18.5 × 18.5)	1561.0^c(39.5 × 39.5)	54.2^b	29^a	6^bc	3.4^a	1.6^b
重度退化 H	641.2^b(25.3 × 25.3)	2696.6^b(51.9 × 51.9)	52.8^b	33^a	9^b	2.6^ab	2.0^ab
极度退化 E	1047.2^a (32.4 × 32.4)	3637.0^a (60.3 × 60.3)	58.6^a	39^a	14^a	3.3^a	2.8^a