小叶锦鸡儿灌丛化对典型草原群落结构与生态系统功能的影响

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2019.0283

植物生态学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 33-43.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2019.0283 cstr: 32100.14.cjpe.2019.0283

所属专题：生态系统结构与功能；植被生态学

小叶锦鸡儿灌丛化对典型草原群落结构与生态系统功能的影响

丁威¹,王玉冰^2,³,向官海^2,³,迟永刚⁴,鲁顺保^1,^*(),郑淑霞^2,^*()

¹江西师范大学生命科学学院, 南昌 330022
²中国科学院植物研究所植被与环境变化国家重点实验室, 北京 100093
³中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
⁴浙江师范大学地理与环境科学学院, 浙江金华 321004

收稿日期:2019-10-22 修回日期:2020-01-14 出版日期:2020-01-20 发布日期:2020-03-26
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2016YFC0500801);国家自然科学基金(41671046);国家自然科学基金(31400393)

Effects of Caragana microphylla encroachment on community structure and ecosystem function of a typical steppe

DING Wei¹,WANG Yu-Bing^2,³,XIANG Guan-Hai^2,³,CHI Yong-Gang⁴,LU Shun-Bao^1,^*(),ZHENG Shu-Xia^2,^*()

¹College of Life Sciences, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China
²State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China
³University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
⁴College of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang 321004, China

Received:2019-10-22 Revised:2020-01-14 Online:2020-01-20 Published:2020-03-26
Supported by:
National Key R&D Program of China(2016YFC0500801);National Natural Science Foundation of China(41671046);National Natural Science Foundation of China(31400393)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

草原灌丛化是全球干旱半干旱地区面临的重要生态问题。灌丛化对草原生态系统结构与功能的影响较为复杂, 有待于在更广泛的区域开展研究。该研究在内蒙古锡林郭勒典型草原选择轻度、中度和重度灌丛化草地, 通过群落调查, 结合植物功能性状和土壤理化性质观测, 研究了小叶锦鸡儿(Caragana microphylla)灌丛化对草原群落结构(物种多样性、功能多样性和功能群组成)和生态系统功能(初级生产力、植被和土壤养分库)的影响。结果表明: 1)不同程度灌丛化草地的物种丰富度、功能性状多样性和群落加权性状平均值差异显著, 其中, 中度灌丛化草地的物种多样性和功能多样性较高, 表明一定程度的灌丛化有利于生物多样性维持。2)重度灌丛化草地的地上净初级生产力(ANPP)显著高于轻度和中度灌丛化草地, 其原因主要是随着灌丛化程度加剧, 群落内一/二年生草本植物显著增加, 而多年生禾草和多年生杂类草显著减少。三个灌丛化草地的植被叶片和土壤碳、氮库差异均不显著。3)灌丛化对草原生态系统功能包括ANPP、植被和土壤养分库均没有直接的影响, 而是通过影响功能群组成、土壤理化性质和功能多样性, 间接地影响生态系统功能; 灌丛化导致功能群发生替代和土壤旱碱化是最重要的生物和非生物因素。

关键词: 灌丛化, 物种多样性, 功能多样性, 植物功能性状, 功能群组成, 生态系统功能

Abstract:

Aims Shrub encroachment is a critical ecological problem in arid and semi-arid ecosystems worldwide. The effects of shrub encroachment on ecosystem structure and function of grasslands are complicated and need to be explored in future studies. Our objective is to examine the effects and pathways of shrub encroachment on ecosystem structure and function in a typical steppe of the Inner Mongolia grassland.
Methods Three grassland sites with different degrees of shrub encroachment (i.e. light, moderate, heavy) were selected in the Xilingol Nei Mongol, of which Caragana microphylla was the dominant shrub. Species richness and composition, aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP), soil property, and plant functional traits of dominant species were determined in this study. In addition, species diversity, functional attribute diversity, community-weighted mean traits, and vegetation leaf and soil carbon and nitrogen pools were further calculated.
Important findings 1) The species richness, functional attribute diversity and community-weighted mean traits differed significantly among three grassland sites, and species diversity and functional diversity were relatively higher in the moderate shrub-encroachment site, indicating moderate shrub-encroachment favors biodiversity maintenance. 2) The aboveground net primary productivity of heavy shrub-encroachment grassland was significantly higher than those of light and moderate shrub-encroachment grasslands, which was mainly due to a shift in functional group composition, that is, the proportion of annuals and biennials to perennial grasses and forbs increased greatly with intensifying shrub encroachment. The vegetation leaf and soil carbon and nitrogen pools differed little among three sites. 3) Shrub encroachment did not directly affect ecosystem function, including ANPP, vegetation and soil nutrient pools, but it indirectly affected them through pathways of the shift in functional group composition and changes in soil property and functional diversity. Particularly, the shift in functional group composition and intensified soil drought and basification was separately important biotic and abiotic factors for variations in ecosystem function.

Key words: shrub encroachment, species diversity, functional diversity, plant functional trait, functional group composition, ecosystem function

丁威,王玉冰,向官海,迟永刚,鲁顺保,郑淑霞. 小叶锦鸡儿灌丛化对典型草原群落结构与生态系统功能的影响. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(1): 33-43. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2019.0283

DING Wei,WANG Yu-Bing,XIANG Guan-Hai,CHI Yong-Gang,LU Shun-Bao,ZHENG Shu-Xia. Effects of Caragana microphylla encroachment on community structure and ecosystem function of a typical steppe. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2020, 44(1): 33-43. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2019.0283

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2019.0283

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2020/V44/I1/33

图/表 7

图1 内蒙古典型草原轻度(A)、中度(B)和重度(C)小叶锦鸡儿灌丛化草地。

Fig. 1 Three grassland sites with light (A), moderate (B) and heavy (C) shrub encroachment by Caragana microphylla in Nei Mongol typical steppe.

表1 内蒙古典型草原不同程度灌丛化草地的小叶锦鸡儿灌丛特征

Table 1 Shrub characteristics of Caragana microphylla at light, moderate and heavy encroachment sites in Nei Mongol typical steppe

灌丛特征 Shrub characteristic	不同程度灌丛化 Degree of shrub encroachment
灌丛特征 Shrub characteristic	轻度 Light	中度 Moderate	重度 Heavy
数量 Number of bunches (No.·25 m^-2)	2 ± 0.5^b (45)	6 ± 0.6^a (94)	5 ± 0.9^a (80)
高度 Height (cm)	24.13 ± 1.45^b (45)	25.71 ± 0.91^b (94)	38.90 ± 2.23^a (80)
冠幅 Crown (cm²)	8 505.6 ± 1 453.0^ab (45)	6 907.3 ± 1 048.8^b (94)	13 083.9 ± 2 289.0^a (80)
冠幅面积比 Crown area ratio (%)	7.66 ± 1.81^b (20)	12.99 ± 2.47^ab (20)	20.93 ± 4.37^a (20)
分蘖株数 Number of individuals (No.·25 m^-2)	25 ± 6^b (504)	32 ± 5^ab (719)	47 ± 8^a (942)

图2 内蒙古典型草原不同程度灌丛化样地草本物种丰富度(A)和功能性状多样性(B)的变化(平均值+标准误差)。功能性状多样性(FAD)由4个性状(株高、株丛生物量、茎叶比和比叶面积)计算而得。不同小写字母表示各样地间差异显著(p < 0.05)。

Fig. 2 Species richness and functional attribute diversity (FAD) at light, moderate and heavy encroachment sites in Nei Mongol typical steppe (mean + SE). FAD was calculated by plant height, plant biomass, stem:leaf biomass ratio and specific leaf area. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among sites (p < 0.05).

图3 内蒙古典型草原不同程度灌丛化样地草本群落加权性状值(CWM)的变化(平均值+标准误差)。群落加权性状值: PBCWM, 株丛生物量; PHCWM, 株高; SLACWM, 比叶面积; SLRCWM, 茎叶比。不同小写字母表示各样地间差异显著(p < 0.05)。

Fig. 3 Community-weighted mean traits (CWM) at light, moderate and heavy encroachment sites in Nei Mongol typical steppe (mean + SE). PBCWM, community-weighted plant biomass; PHCWM, community-weighted plant height; SLACWM, community-weighted specific leaf area; SLRCWM, community-weighted stem:leaf ratio. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among sites (p < 0.05).

图4 内蒙古典型草原不同程度灌丛化草地地上净初级生产力(ANPP)和功能群生物量(RAB)的变化(平均值+标准误差)。AB, 一/二年生草本; PF, 多年生杂类草; PG, 多年生禾草。不同小写字母表示各样地间差异显著(p < 0.05)。

Fig. 4 Aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) and relative biomass (RAB) of different functional groups at light, moderate and heavy encroachment sites in Nei Mongol typical steppe (mean + SE). AB, annuals and biennials; PF, perennial forbs; PG, perennial graminoids. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among sites (p < 0.05).

图5 灌丛化对内蒙古典型草原植被叶片和土壤C、N库的影响(平均值+标准误差)。样地间差异均不显著(p > 0.05)。

Fig. 5 Effects of shrub encroachment on C and N pools of vegetational leaf and soil in Nei Mongol typical steppe (mean + SE). No significant differences among sites (p > 0.05).

图6 灌丛化对草原生态功能包括地上净初级生产力(ANPP)、植被和土壤养分(C、N)库影响的直接与间接途径。箭头正负数值为标准化回归系数, 表示正、负效应; r2值表示某一变量被其他变量的方差解释量。

Fig. 6 Structural equation model (SEM) analyses of direct and indirect effects of shrub encroachment on grassland ecosystem function, including aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP), vegetation and soil nutrient pools (C and N). Values associated with solid arrows are standardized path coefficients, indicating positive or negative effects. r2 values associated with response variables indicate the proportion of variation explained by relationships with other variables.

参考文献 38

[1]	Archer SR, Andersen EM, Predick KI, Schwinning S, Steidl RJ, Woods SR (2017). Woody plant encroachment: Causes and consequences. In: Briske DD ed. Rangeland Systems. Springer, New York. 25-84.
[2]	Archer SR, Schimel DS, Holland EA (1995). Mechanisms of shrubland expansion: Land use, climate or CO₂? Climatic Change, 29, 91-99.
[3]	Barger NN, Archer SR, Campbell JL, Huang CY, Morton JA, Knapp AK (2011). Woody plant proliferation in North American drylands: A synthesis of impacts on ecosystem carbon balance. Journal of Geophysical Research, 116, G00K07. DOI: 10.1029/2010JG001506.
[4]	Chen LY, Li H, Zhang PJ, Zhao X, Zhou LH, Liu TY, Hu HF, Bai YF, Shen HH, Fang JY (2015). Climate and native grassland vegetation as drivers of the community structures of shrub-encroached grasslands in Inner Mongolia, China. Landscape Ecology, 30, 1627-1641.
[5]	Darrouzet-Nardi A, D’Antonio CM, Dawson TE (2006). Depth of water acquisition by invading shrubs and resident herbs in a Sierra Nevada meadow. Plant and Soil, 285, 31-43. DOI URL
[6]	Eldridge DJ, Bowker MA, Maestre FT, Roger E, Reynolds JF, Whitford WG (2011). Impacts of shrub encroachment on ecosystem structure and functioning: Towards a global synthesis. Ecology Letters, 14, 709-722. DOI URL
[7]	Eldridge DJ, Soliveres S, Bowker MA, Val J (2013). Grazing dampens the positive effects of shrub encroachment on ecosystem functions in a semi-arid woodland. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50, 1028-1038.
[8]	Gao Q, Liu T (2015). Causes and consequences of shrub encroachment in arid and semiarid region: A disputable issue. Arid Land Geography, 38, 1202-1212.
	[ 高琼, 刘婷 (2015). 干旱半干旱区草原灌丛化的原因及影响-争议与进展. 干旱区地理, 38, 1202-1212.]
[9]	Gross N, Suding KN, Lavorel S, Roumet C (2007). Complementarity as a mechanism of coexistence between functional groups of grasses. Journal of Ecology, 95, 1296-1305.
[10]	Grover HD, Musick HB (1990). Shrubland encroachment in southern New Mexico, USA: An analysis of desertification processes in the American Southwest. Climatic Change, 17, 305-330.
[11]	Holzapfel C, Mahall BE (1999). Bidirectional facilitation and interference between shrubs and annuals in the Mojave Desert. Ecology, 80, 1747-1761.
[12]	Huxman TE, Wilcox BP, Breshears DD, Scott RL, Snyder KA, Small EE, Hultine K, Pockman WT, Jackson RB (2005). Ecohydrological implications of woody plant encroachment. Ecology, 86, 308-319. DOI URL
[13]	Jackson RB, Banner JL, Jobbágy EG, Pockman WT, Wall DH (2002). Ecosystem carbon loss with woody plant invasion of grasslands. Nature, 418, 623-626.
[14]	Knapp AK, Briggs JM, Collins SL, Archer SR, Bret-Harte MS, Ewers BE, Peters DP, Young DR, Shaver GR, Pendall E, Cleary MB (2008). Shrub encroachment in North American grasslands: Shifts in growth form dominance rapidly alters control of ecosystem carbon inputs. Global Change Biology, 14, 615-623.
[15]	Lan ZC, Bai YF (2012). Testing mechanisms of N-enrichment- induced species loss in a semiarid Inner Mongolia grassland: Critical thresholds and implications for long-term ecosystem responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367, 3125-3134.
[16]	Lavorel S, Grigulis K, McIntyre S, Williams NSG, Garden D, Dorrough J, Berman S, Quétier F, Thébault A, Bonis A (2008). Assessing functional diversity in the field— Methodology matters! Functional Ecology, 22, 134-147.
[17]	Li XY, Zhang SY, Peng HY, Hu X, Ma YJ (2013). Soil water and temperature dynamics in shrub-encroached grasslands and climatic implications: Results from Inner Mongolia steppe ecosystem of north China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 171-172, 20-30. DOI URL
[18]	Maestre FT, Bowker MA, Puche MD, Belén Hinojosa M, Martínez I, García-Palacios P, Castillo AP, Soliveres S, Luzuriaga AL, Sánchez AM, Carreira JA, Gallardo A, Escudero A (2009). Shrub encroachment can reverse desertification in semi-arid Mediterranean grasslands. Ecology Letters, 12, 930-941.
[19]	Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Desertification Synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington.
[20]	Morgan JA, Milchunas DG, LeCain DR, West M, Mosier AR (2007). Carbon dioxide enrichment alters plant community structure and accelerates shrub growth in the shortgrass steppe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 14724-14729.
[21]	Neilson RP (1986). High-resolution climatic analysis and southwest biogeography. Science, 232, 27-34.
[22]	Parizek B, Rostagno CM, Sottini R (2002). Soil erosion as affected by shrub encroachment in northeastern Patagonia. Journal of Range Management, 55, 43-48.
[23]	Peng HY, Li XY, Li GY, Zhang ZH, Zhang SY, Li L, Zhao GQ, Jiang ZY, Ma YJ (2013). Shrub encroachment with increasing anthropogenic disturbance in the semiarid Inner Mongolian grasslands of China. Catena, 109, 39-48.
[24]	Pugnaire FI, Armas C, Maestre FT (2011). Positive plant interactions in the Iberian Southeast: Mechanisms, environmental gradients, and ecosystem function. Journal of Arid Environments, 75, 1310-1320.
[25]	Ratajczak Z, DʼOdorico P, Nippert JB, Collins SL, Brunsell NA, Ravi S (2017). Changes in spatial variance during a grassland to shrubland state transition. Journal of Ecology, 105, 750-760.
[26]	Roscher C, Weigelt A, Proulx R, Marquard E, Schumacher J, Weisser WW, Schmid B (2011). Identifying population- and community-level mechanisms of diversity-stability relationships in experimental grasslands. Journal of Ecology, 99, 1460-1469.
[27]	Seifan M, Kadmon R (2006). Indirect effects of cattle grazing on shrub spatial pattern in a mediterranean scrub community. Basic and Applied Ecology, 7, 496-506. DOI URL
[28]	Shackleton CM, Scholes RJ (2011). Above ground woody community attributes, biomass and carbon stocks along a rainfall gradient in the savannas of the central lowveld, South Africa. South African Journal of Botany, 77, 184-192. DOI URL
[29]	Soliveres S, Eldridge DJ (2014). Do changes in grazing pressure and the degree of shrub encroachment alter the effects of individual shrubs on understorey plant communities and soil function? Functional Ecology, 28, 530-537.
[30]	Thompson WA, Eldridge DJ (2005). Plant cover and composition in relation to density of Callitris glaucophylla(white cypress pine) along a rainfall gradient in eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Botany, 53, 545.
[31]	Throop HL, Archer SR, Monger HC, Waltman S (2012). When bulk density methods matter: Implications for estimating soil organic carbon pools in rocky soils. Journal of Arid Environments, 77, 66-71.
[32]	van Auken OW (2009). Causes and consequences of woody plant encroachment into western North American grasslands. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 2931-2942.
[33]	Walker B, Kinzig A, Langridge J (1999). Plant attribute diversity, resilience, and ecosystem function: The nature and significance of dominant and minor species. Ecosystems, 2, 95-113.
[34]	Wan HW, Pan QM, Bai YF (2013). China grassland biodiversity monitoring network: Indicators and implementation plan. Biodiversity Science, 21, 639-650.
	[ 万宏伟, 潘庆民, 白永飞 (2013). 中国草地生物多样性监测网络的指标体系及实施方案. 生物多样性, 21, 639-650.]
[35]	Xiong XG, Han XG (2006). Application of state and transition models to discussing the thicketization of steppe in Xilin River Basin, Inner Mongolia. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 15(2), 9-13.
	[ 熊小刚, 韩兴国 (2006). 运用状态与过渡模式讨论锡林河流域典型草原的灌丛化. 草业学报, 15(2), 9-13.]
[36]	Zarovali MP, Yiakoulaki MD, Papanastasis VP (2007). Effects of shrub encroachment on herbage production and nutritive value in semi-arid Mediterranean grasslands. Grass and Forage Science, 62, 355-363. DOI URL
[37]	Zheng SX, Ren HY, Li WH, Lan ZC (2012). Scale-dependent effects of grazing on plant C:N:P stoichiometry and linkages to ecosystem functioning in the Inner Mongolia grassland. PLOS ONE, 7, e51750. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051750.
[38]	Zhou LH, Shen HH, Chen LY, Li H, Zhang PJ, Zhao X, Liu TY, Liu SS, Xing AJ, Hu HF, Fang JY (2019). Ecological consequences of shrub encroachment in the grasslands of northern China. Landscape Ecology, 34, 119-130.

小叶锦鸡儿灌丛化对典型草原群落结构与生态系统功能的影响

Effects of Caragana microphylla encroachment on community structure and ecosystem function of a typical steppe

全文

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 38

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	段建林, 孟晟, 陈仁利, 熊林峰, 卢春洋, 席念勋. 全球变化因子多样性对菌根植物性状的影响[J]. , 2026, 50(预发表): 0-.
[2]	何青, 袁旭东, 任博申, 冯治洋, 鲁梦珍, 林巧玲, 姜庆虎, 杨林森, 余辉亮, 姚辉, 杨敬元, 刘峰, 江明喜. 一年蓬（Erigeron annuus）入侵对亚高山泥炭湿地植物群落结构与多样性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(预发表): 0-.
[3]	张安宁, 肖亚宁, 赵霞, 张淼, 崔瀚文, 陈书燕, 安黎哲. 青藏高原灌木化与氮添加对土壤线虫及功能性状的交互作用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(预发表): 0-.
[4]	马建辉, 童鑫, 张思榕, 毛子昆, 秦俊, 马克平. 菌根真菌生理生态功能研究进展及展望[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 498-514.
[5]	郑子仪, 陈江慧, 刘慧颖. 气候变暖提高青藏高原高寒草甸优势物种的根系分泌速率[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1363-1373.
[6]	崔冬晴, 田晨, 宋慧敏, 鲁小名, 萨其日, 徐国庆, 杨培志, 白永飞, 田建卿. 典型草原优势植物根际细菌群落多样性和功能群组成对长期放牧的响应机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(7): 1163-1176.
[7]	惠城阳, 章巧依, 刘腾腾, 刘维勇, 周丽娜, 金鑫杰, 张永华, 刘金亮. 温州大罗山主要植被类型及物种组成特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(6): 990-998.
[8]	杜英杰, 范爱连, 王雪, 闫晓俊, 陈廷廷, 贾林巧, 姜琦, 陈光水. 亚热带天然常绿阔叶林乔木树种与林下灌木树种根-叶功能性状协调性及差异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(4): 585-595.
[9]	吴闫宁, 郝珉辉, 何怀江, 张春雨, 赵秀海. 长白山森林功能多样性与地上碳汇功能的关系及其随演替的变化[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(2): 232-243.
[10]	郭欢敏, 沈小雪, 李瑞利. 深圳湾福田红树林自然保护区物种共存特征与物种分布概率[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(11): 1833-1843.
[11]	张晓婷, 王俊杰. 盐和铜处理下红树植物叶绿素荧光特性变化与叶片结构及生化组分关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(11): 1944-1956.
[12]	童金莲, 张博纳, 汤璐瑶, 叶琳峰, 李姝雯, 谢江波, 李彦, 王忠媛. C₄植物狗尾草功能性状网络沿降水梯度带的区域分异规律[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(11): 1817-1832.
[13]	牛亚平, 高晓霞, 姚世庭, 杨元合, 彭云峰. 退化高寒草地植物多样性和功能群组成与地上生产力的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(1): 83-92.
[14]	郝毅晴, 刘伟, 杨阳, 安冰儿, 范冰, 李超, 崔久辉, 程延彬, 孙佳美, 潘庆民. 有机肥和无机肥对退化草原羊草种群密度和个体生物量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(1): 148-158.
[15]	马东峰, 贾存智, 王学朋, 赵鹏鹏, 胡小文. 甘南高寒退化草甸多物种组配的修复效果评估[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(1): 93-102.