Chin J Plan Ecolo ›› 2018, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 220-228.doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2017.0258

• Research Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Changes in hydraulic traits of nine vascular plants from different evolutionary lineages

ZHAO Le-Wen1,CHEN Zi-Yi1,ZOU Ying1,FU Zi-Zhao1,WU Gui-Lin2,3,LIU Xiao-Rong2,3,LUO Qi2,3,LIN Yi-Xue4,2,LI Xiong-Ju1,LIU Zhi-Tong 1,LIU Hui2,*()   

  1. 1 Guangdong Experimental High School, Guangzhou 510375, China

    2 Key Laboratory of Vegetation Restoration and Management of Degraded Ecosystems, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China

    3 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

    4 Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China
  • Online:2018-04-16 Published:2018-02-20
  • Contact: Hui LIU E-mail:hui.liu@scbg.ac.cn
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China.(31670411)

Abstract:

Aims As vascular plants evolve from ferns to gymnosperms and angiosperms, their physiological structures and functions are assumed more adaptable to arid environment. Whether the three plant groups from early to late evolved lineages have improved their water transport and use efficiency has been studied on the basis of the morphological structure of leaf veins and stomata.Moreover, the water transportation rate was directly measured in the angiosperms. Therefore, we measured structural and functional traits related to water relations in all three plant groups simultaneously, to test the hypothesis on the evolutionary process of plant hydraulics.

Methods We selected three species in each group grown in South China Botanical Garden, Guangzhou, China, including ferns (Dicranopteris pedata, Cyclosorus parasiticus and Blechnum orientale), gymnosperms (Podocarpus macrophyllus, Podocarpus nagi and Taxodium distichum) and angiosperms (Manglietia fordiana var. hainanensis, Sindora tonkinensis and Bauhinia purpurea).

Important findings Sapwood and leaf specific hydraulic conductivities (KS and KL, respectively), and leaf conductance (Kleaf) significantly increased from ferns, gymnosperms to angiosperms. However, no significant trends were found in transpiration rate (E) and intrinsic water use efficiency. Meanwhile, neither the size and density of stomata nor wood density showed significant difference among three plant groups. The hydraulic functional traits (KS, KL and Kleaf) had significantly positive correlations with each other, but had no relationships with the two measured structural traits. Phylogenetic independent contrasts analyses showed that the coordination between KS and Kleaf, and between KS and E were independent of the phylogeny. Based on the nine vascular species, this study demonstrated that water transport related traits are improved as vascular plants evolved, and the co-evolution between water transport and transpiration traits were identified. For further study, it is necessary to consolidate our data with investigations of more detailed water-transport structures in more species from different evolutionary lineages.

Key words: functional traits, adaptation, water transport, phylogenetic independent contrast, correlated evolution

Table 1

Summary of the nine species from three evolutionary lineages in this study"

物种
Species
缩略词
Abbreviation

Family
蕨类植物 Ferns 芒萁 Dicranopteris pedata Dp 里白科 Gleicheniaceae
华南毛蕨 Cyclosorus parasiticus Cp 金星蕨科 Thelypteridaceae
乌毛蕨 Blechnum orientale Bo 乌毛蕨科 Blechnaceae
裸子植物 Gymnosperms 罗汉松 Podocarpus macrophyllus Pm 罗汉松科 Podocarpaceae
竹柏 Podocarpus nagi Pn 罗汉松科 Podocarpaceae
落羽杉 Taxodium distichum Td 杉科 Taxodiaceae
被子植物 Angiosperms 海南木莲 Manglietia fordiana var. hainanensis Mh 木兰科 Magnoliaceae
东京油楠 Sindora tonkinensis St 豆科 Fabaceae
羊蹄甲 Bauhinia purpurea Bp 豆科 Fabaceae

Fig. 1

Comparison of sapwood-specific hydraulic conductivity (KS), leaf-specific hydraulic conductivity (KL) and leaf hydraulic conductance (Kleaf) among the nine species from three evolutionary lineages (mean ± SE, n = 3-5). Letters on top of each bar in the right column are HSD multiple comparison results, the phylogenetic tree of the nine species is drawn at the bottom. See species abbrivations in Table 1. Fern, ferns; Gym, gynosperms; Ang, angiosperms."

Fig. 2

Comparison of leaf transpiration rate (E) and intrinsic water use efficiency (WUEi) among the nine species from three evolutionary lineages (mean ± SE, n = 3-5). Notes are the same with Fig. 1."

Fig. 3

Comparison of stomatal area index (SPI) and wood density (WD) among the nine species from three evolutionary lineages (mean ± SE, n = 3-5). Notes are the same with Fig. 1."

Fig. 4

Correlations between sapwood-specific hydraulic conductivity (KS) and leaf hydraulic conductance (Kleaf)(A, B), and leaf transpiration rate (E)(C, D) among the nine species from three evolutionary lineages. A, C, traditional cross-species correlations; B, D, correlations among phylogenetically independent contrasts. In A and C, data are mean ± SE (n = 3-5), Pearson correlation coefficients (r) and p values are reported."

[1] Azani N, Babineau M, Bailey CD, Banks H, Barbosa AR, Pinto RB, Boatwright JS, Borges LM, Brown GK, Bruneau A, Candido E, Cardoso D, Chung K-F, Clark RP, Concei??o AdS, Crisp M, Cubas P, Delgado-Salinas A, Dexter KG, Doyle JJ, Duminil J, Egan AN, De La Estrella M, Falc?o MJ, Filatov DA, Fortuna-Perez AP, Fortunato RH, Gagnon E, Gasson P, Rando JG, Azevedo Tozzi AMGd, Gunn B, Harris D, Haston E, Hawkins JA, Herendeen PS, Hughes CE, Iganci JRV, Javadi F, Kanu SA, Kazempour- Osaloo S, Kite GC, Klitgaard BB, Kochanovski FJ, Koenen EJM, Kovar L, Lavin M, Roux Ml, Lewis GP, de Lima HC, López Roberts MC, Mackinder B, Maia VH, Malécot V, Mansano VF, Marazzi B, Mattapha S, Miller JT, Mitsuyuki C, Moura T, Murphy DJ, Nageswara-Rao M, Nevado B, Neves D, Ojeda DI, Pennington RT, Prado DE, Prenner G, de Queiroz LP, Ramos G, Ranzato Filardi FL, Ribeiro PG, Rico-Arce MdL, Sanderson MJ, Santos- Silva J, S?o-Mateus WMB, Silva MJS, Simon MF, Sinou C, Snak C, de Souza éR, Sprent J, Steele KP, Steier JE, Steeves R, Stirton CH, Tagane S, Torke BM, Toyama H, Cruz DTd, Vatanparast M, Wieringa JJ, Wink M, Wojciechowski MF, Yahara T, Yi T, Zimmerman E ( 2017). A new subfamily classification of the Leguminosae based on a taxonomically comprehensive phylogeny, The Legume Phylogeny Working Group (LPWG). Taxon, 66, 44-77.
doi: 10.12705/661.3
[2] Boyce CK, Brodribb TJ, Feild TS, Zwieniecki MA ( 2009). Angiosperm leaf vein evolution was physiologically and environmentally transformative. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 276, 1771-1776.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1919
[3] Brodribb TJ, Bienaimé D, Marmottant P ( 2016). Revealing catastrophic failure of leaf networks under stress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 4865-4869.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1522569113 pmid: 27071104
[4] Brodribb TJ, Feild TS ( 2010). Leaf hydraulic evolution led a surge in leaf photosynthetic capacity during early angiosperm diversification. Ecology Letters, 13, 175-183.
doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01410.x pmid: 19968696
[5] Brodribb TJ, Feild TS, Jordan GJ ( 2007). Leaf maximum photosynthetic rate and venation are linked by hydraulics. Plant Physiology, 144, 1890-1898.
doi: 10.1104/pp.107.101352
[6] Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM ( 2003 a). Changes in leaf hydraulic conductance during leaf shedding in seasonally dry tropical forest. New Phytologist, 158, 295-303.
doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00736.x
[7] Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM ( 2003 b). Stomatal closure during leaf dehydration, correlation with other leaf physiological traits. Plant Physiology, 132, 2166-2173.
doi: 10.4314/mmj.v21i4.49641
[8] Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM, Zwieniecki MA, Palma B ( 2005). Leaf hydraulic capacity in ferns, conifers and angiosperms, impacts on photosynthetic maxima. New Phytologist, 165, 839-846.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01259.x pmid: 15720695
[9] Buckley LB, Kingsolver JG ( 2012). Functional and phylogenetic approaches to forecasting species responses to climate change. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 43, 205-264.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160516
[10] Darwin C ( 1859). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. John Murray, London.
[11] Escalona JM, Flexas J, Medrano H ( 1999). Stomatal and non-stomatal limitations of photosynthesis under water stress in field-grown grapevines. Functional Plant Biology, 26, 421-433.
doi: 10.1071/PP99019_CO
[12] Fan ZX, Zhang SB, Hao GY, Ferry Slik JW, Cao KF ( 2012). Hydraulic conductivity traits predict growth rates and adult stature of 40 Asian tropical tree species better than wood density. Journal of Ecology, 100, 732-741.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01939.x
[13] Franks PJ, Beerling DJ ( 2009). Maximum leaf conductance driven by CO2 effects on stomatal size and density over geologic time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 10343-10347.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0904209106
[14] Franks PJ, Drake PL, Beerling DJ ( 2009). Plasticity in maximum stomatal conductance constrained by negative correlation between stomatal size and density, an analysis using Eucalyptus globulus. Plant, Cell & Environment, 32, 1737-1748.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.002031.x pmid: 19682293
[15] Freckleton RP, Harvey PH, Pagel M ( 2002). Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data, a test and review of evidence. The American Naturalist, 160, 712-726.
doi: 10.1086/343873 pmid: 18707460
[16] Givnish TJ ( 2002). Adaptive significance of evergreen vs. deciduous leaves, solving the triple paradox. Silva Fennica, 36, 703-743.
[17] Guyot G, Scoffoni C, Sack L ( 2012). Combined impacts of irradiance and dehydration on leaf hydraulic conductance, insights into vulnerability and stomatal control. Plant, Cell & Environment, 35, 857-871.
[18] Hacke UG, Sperry JS, Pockman WT, Davis SD, McCulloh KA ( 2001). Trends in wood density and structure are linked to prevention of xylem implosion by negative pressure. Oecologia, 126, 457-461.
doi: 10.1007/s004420100628
[19] Ishida A, Nakano T, Yazaki K, Matsuki S, Koike N, Lauenstein D, Shimizu M, Yamashita N ( 2008). Coordination between leaf and stem traits related to leaf carbon gain and hydraulics across 32 drought-tolerant angiosperms. Oecologia, 156, 193-202.
doi: 10.1007/s00442-008-0965-6 pmid: 18297313
[20] Liu H, Xu QY, He PC, Santiago LS, Yang KM, Ye Q ( 2015 a). Strong phylogenetic signals and phylogenetic niche conservatism in ecophysiological traits across divergent lineages of Magnoliaceae. Scientific Reports, 5, 12246. DOI: 10.1038/srep12246.
doi: 10.1038/srep12246 pmid: 4503962
[21] Liu YY, Song J, Wang M, Li N, Niu CY, Hao GY ( 2015 b). Coordination of xylem hydraulics and stomatal regulation in keeping the integrity of xylem water transport in shoots of two compound-leaved tree species. Tree Physiology, 35, 1333-1342.
doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpv061 pmid: 26209618
[22] Nicotra AB, Davidson A ( 2010). Adaptive phenotypic plasticity and plant water use. Functional Plant Biology, 37, 117-127.
doi: 10.1071/FP09139
[23] Nicotra AB, Leigh A, Boyce CK, Jones CS, Niklas KJ, Royer DL, Tsukaya H ( 2011). The evolution and functional significance of leaf shape in the angiosperms. Functional Plant Biology, 38, 535-552.
doi: 10.1071/FP11057
[24] Oren R, Sperry JS, Ewers BE, Pataki DE, Philips N, Megonigal JP ( 2001). Sensitivity of mean canopy stomatal conductance to vapor pressure deficit in a flooded Taxodium distichum L. forest: Hydraulic and non-hydraulic effects. Oecologia, 126, 21-29.
doi: 10.1007/s004420000497 pmid: 28547434
[25] Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K ( 2004). APE, analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics, 20, 289-290.
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412 pmid: 14734327
[26] Quinn CJ, Price RA, Gadek PA ( 2002). Familial concepts and relationships in the conifer based on rbcL and matK sequence comparisons. Kew Bulletin, 57, 513-531.
[27] Sack L, Cowan PD, Jaikumar N, Holbrook NM ( 2003). The ‘hydrology’ of leaves, co-ordination of structure and function in temperature woody species. Plant, Cell & Environment, 26, 1343-1356.
doi: 10.1046/j.0016-8025.2003.01058.x
[28] Santiago LS, Goldstein G, Meinzer FC, Fisher JB, Machado K, Woodruff D, Jones T ( 2004). Leaf photosynthetic traits scale with hydraulic conductivity and wood density in Panamanian forest canopy trees. Oecologia, 140, 543-550.
doi: 10.1007/s00442-004-1624-1 pmid: 15232729
[29] Scoffoni C, McKown AD, Rawls M, Sack L ( 2012). Dynamics of leaf hydraulic conductance with water status, quantification and analysis of species differences under steady state. Journal of Experimental Botany, 63, 643-658.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/err270 pmid: 3254676
[30] Song J, Li RH, Zhu SD, Ye Q ( 2013). Leaf functional traits of ferns from different habitats in monsoon evergreen broad- leaved forest in Dinghushan Mountain . Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 21, 489-495.
宋娟, 李荣华, 朱师丹 鼎湖山季风常绿阔叶林不同生境蕨类植物的叶片功能性状研究. 热带亚热带植物学报, 21, 489-495.]
[31] Sperry JS, Donnelly JR, Tyree MT ( 1988). A method for measuring hydraulic conductivity and embolism in xylem. Plant, Cell & Environment, 11, 35-40.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1988.tb01774.x
[32] Testo W, Sundue M ( 2016). A 4000-species dataset provides new insight into the evolution of ferns. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 105, 200-211.
doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2016.09.003 pmid: 27621129
[33] Trifiló P, Raimondo F, Savi T, Lo Gullo MA, Nardini A ( 2016). The contribution of vascular and extra-vascular water pathways to drought-induced decline of leaf hydraulic conductance. Journal of Experimental Botany, 67, erw268. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erw268.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw268 pmid: 27388214
[34] Tuzet A, Perrier A, Leuning R ( 2003). A coupled model of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration. Plant, Cell & Environment, 26, 1097-1116.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01035.x
[35] Webb CO, Ackerly DD, Kembel SW ( 2008). Phylocom, software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure trait evolution. Bioinformatics, 24, 2098-2100.
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn358
[36] Wu DL ( 2006). loral of Guangdong . Guangdong Science & Technology Press, Guangzhou.
[ 吴德邻 ( 2006). 广东植物志 .广东科技出版社, 广州.]
[37] Zhan XY, Yu GR, Sheng WP, Fang HJ ( 2012). Foliar water use efficiency and nitrogen use efficiency of dominant plant species in main forests along the North-South Transect of East China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 23, 587-594.
[ 展小云, 于贵瑞, 盛文萍, 方华军 ( 2012). 中国东部南北样带森林优势植物叶片的水分利用效率和氮素利用效率. 应用生态学报 , 23, 587-594.]
[38] Zhang Y, Yang SJ, Sun M, Cao KF ( 2014). Stomatal traits are evolutionarily associated with vein density in basal angiosperms. Plant Science Journal, 32, 320-328.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2014.40320
[ 张亚, 杨石建, 孙梅, 曹坤芳 ( 2014). 基部被子植物气孔性状与叶脉密度的关联演化.植物科学学报 , 32, 320-328.]
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1142.2014.40320
[1] FU Yi-Wen, TIAN Da-Shuan, WANG Jin-Song, NIU Shu-Li, ZHAO Ken-Tian. Patterns and affecting factors of nitrogen use efficiency of plant leaves and roots in Nei Mongol and Qinghai-Xizang Plateau grasslands [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2019, 43(7): 566-575.
[2] Gu Hanjiao, Zhang Cancan, Wang Jinsong, Shi Xuewen, Xia Ruixue, Liu Bin, Chen Fusheng, Bu Wensheng. Variation in basic morphological and functional traits of Chinese bamboo [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2019, 27(6): 585-594.
[3] ZHAO Dan-Dan, MA Hong-Yuan, LI Yang, WEI Ji-Ping, WANG Zhi-Chun. Effects of water and nutrient additions on functional traits and aboveground biomass of Leymus chinensis [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2019, 43(6): 501-511.
[4] Xie Lihong,Huang Qingyang,Cao Hongjie,Yang Fan,Wang Jifeng,Ni Hongwei. Leaf functional traits of Acer mono in Wudalianchi Volcano, China [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2019, 27(3): 286-296.
[5] Ruyun Zhang,Yanpeng Li,Yunlong Ni,Xujun Gui,Juyu Lian,Wanhui Ye. Intraspecific variation of leaf functional traits along the vertical layer in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest of Dinghushan [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2019, 27(12): 1279-1290.
[6] LIANG Shi-Chu, LIU Run-Hong, RONG Chun-Yan, CHANG Bin, JIANG Yong. Variation and correlation of plant functional traits in the riparian zone of the Lijiang River, Guilin, Southwest China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2019, 43(1): 16-26.
[7] GAO Si-Han, GE Yu-Xi, ZHOU Li-Yi, ZHU Bao-Lin, GE Xing-Yu, LI Kai, NI Jian. What is the optimal number of leaves when measuring leaf area of tree species in a forest community? [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2018, 42(9): 917-925.
[8] PENG Xi, YAN Wen-De, WANG Feng-Qi, WANG Guang-Jun, YU Fang-Yong, ZHAO Mei-Fang. Specific leaf area estimation model building based on leaf dry matter content of Cunninghamia lanceolata [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2018, 42(2): 209-219.
[9] Hua-Jun YIN,Zi-Liang ZHANG,Qing LIU. Root exudates and their ecological consequences in forest ecosystems: Problems and perspective [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2018, 42(11): 1055-1070.
[10] Xiao-Lan ZHENG, Rui-Jiao WANG, Qun-Fa ZHAO, Yong-Peng LIU, Yuan-Yuan WANG, Zhi-Qiang SUN. Ecophysiological mechanisms of plant growth under the influence of rhizosphere oxygen concentration: A review [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2017, 41(7): 805-814.
[11] Jian-Guo CAI, Meng-Qi WEI, Yi ZHANG, Yun-Long WEI. Effects of shading on photosynthetic characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in leaves of Hydrangea macrophylla [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2017, 41(5): 570-576.
[12] Hong-Tao XIE, Mu-Kui YU, Xiang-Rong CHENG. Effects of light intensity variation on nitrogen and phosphorus contents, allocation and limitation in five shade-enduring plants [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2017, 41(5): 559-569.
[13] Yan Li, Junyi Gai. The Genetic Basis of Soybean Extended to Tropical Regions [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2017, 52(4): 389-393.
[14] Xue YANG, Jun-Fang SHEN, Nian-Xi ZHAO, Yu-Bao GAO. Phenotypic plasticity and genetic differentiation of quantitative traits in genotypes of Leymus chinensis [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2017, 41(3): 359-368.
[15] Li Yi-Bo, SONG He, ZHOU Li, XU Zhen-Zhu, ZHOU Guang-Sheng. Modeling study on photosynthetic-light response curves of a C4 plant, maize [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2017, 41(12): 1289-1300.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Liu Ying-di. The Role of Ultrastructure in Algal Systematics[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1990, 7(04): 18 -23 .
[2] Fan Guo-qiang and Jiang Jian-ping. Study on the Methods of Extraction of Protein from Paulownia Leaves[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1997, 14(03): 61 -64 .
[3] Tong Zhe and Lian Han-ping. Cryptochrome[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1985, 3(02): 6 -9 .
[4] Huang Ju-fu and Luo Ai-ling. The Advances of the Studies on Extraction of FeMoco from Nitrogenase Molybdenum-Iron Protein[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1991, 8(03): 19 -25 .
[5] Hsu Rong-jiang Gu Wen-mao Gao Jing-cheng and Peng Chang-ming. Inhibitory Effect of High CO2 and Low O2 Tension on Ethylene Evolution in Apples[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1984, 2(01): 29 -31 .
[6] Zou Shu-hua;Zhao Shu-wen and Xu Bao. Electropheresis Profiles of Esterase Isozymes in Different Types of Soybean[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1985, 3(06): 18 -20 .
[7] . [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1999, 16(增刊): 49 -52 .
[8] Chi Tingfei;Shi Xiaofang;Huang Ruzhu;Zheng Xiangyun;Yuan Xiangning and Wu Dangjian. A Preliminary Study on the Chemical Constituents of the Leave Oil in prunus zippeliana Mig[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1986, 4(12): 44 -45 .
[9] Houqing Zeng, Yaxian Zhang, Shang Wang, Xiajun Zhang, Huizhong Wang, Liqun Du. Calcium/calmodulin-mediated Signal Transduction System in Plants[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2016, 51(5): 705 -723 .
[10] Zhu Zhi-qing. Abbreviations for some Commonly Used Terms in Ultrastructures of Plant Cells[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1984, 2(04): 57 -58 .