Chin J Plan Ecolo ›› 2013, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 551-557.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00056

• Research Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on leaf carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry of Arabidopsis thaliana

YAN Zheng-Bing1*, KIM Nam-Young1*, HAN Ting-Shen2, FANG Jing-Yun1, and HAN Wen-Xuan3**   

  1. 1College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;

    2State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China;

    3College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
  • Received:2013-03-20 Revised:2013-04-10 Online:2013-06-05 Published:2013-06-01
  • Contact: HAN Wen-Xuan E-mail:hanwenxuan@cau.edu.cn

Abstract:

Aims Arabidopsis thaliana, a widely used model organism in plant biology, is an ideal plant to test the growth rate hypothesis (GRH) and homeostasis theory about plant nutrition. Our objectives are to test i) whether GRH applies to this plant species, ii) how leaf nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) of A. thaliana follow the homeostasis theory and iii) whether the allometric relationship between leaf N and P content is consistent with the 3/4 power function (N-P3/4) for individual plant species.
Methods Based on a pot experiment in a phytotron with N and P fertilizer additions, we measured the leaf carbon (C), N and P content and leaf biomass of A. thaliana. Specific growth rate (mg·mg–1·d–1) was the leaf biomass increment divided by the initial biomass at planting, and by the days after planting. The homeostasis of plant elements is indicated by the exponent (reciprocal of the regulation coefficient) of the power function of leaf nutrient against soil nutrient concentrations.
Important findings P is the limiting nutrient of the culture substrate for A. thaliana, while N fertilization could cause toxic effects in cases of excessive N uptake. The growth of A. thaliana is consistent with GRH—the specific growth rate decreases with increasing leaf N:P or C:P. Leaf P content shows a significant regulation coefficient (3.51) (leaf-P-substrate-P1/3.51), but leaf N content has no significant relationship with substrate N. There is a significant allometric relationship between leaf N and P content, which is inconsistent with the 3/4 power function (N-P3/4). The power exponent (0.209) between leaf N content and leaf P content in the P fertilization treatments is significantly lower than the exponent (0.466) in the N fertilization treatments, suggesting that fertilization may affect the allometry between nutrients. Our findings can offer reference for future field studies on plant ecological stoichiometry at scales from species to community to ecosystem.

[1]Acharya K, Kyle M, Elser JJ (2004). Biological stoichiometry of daphnia growth: an ecophysiological test of the growth rate hypothesis. Limnology and Oceanography, 49, 656–665. Crossref
[2] Ågren GI (2008). Stoichiometry and nutrition of plant growth in natural communities. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 39, 153–170. Crossref
[3] Chapin FS III, Vitousek PM, van Cleve K (1986). The nature of nutrient limitation in plant communities. The American Naturalist, 127, 48–58. Crossref
[4] Dong M (1997). Survey, Observation and Analysis of Terrestrial Biocommunities. China Standard Press, Beijing. 154–160. (in Chinese) [董鸣 (1997). 陆地生物群落调查观测分析. 中国标准出版社, 北京. 154–160.] Crossref
[5] Elser JJ, Acharya K, Kyle M, Cotner J, Makino W, Watts T, Hobbie S, Fagan W, Schade J, Hood J, Sterner RW (2003). Growth rate-stoichiometry couplings in diverse biota. Ecology Letters, 6, 936–943. Crossref
[6] Elser JJ, Dobberfuhl DR, MacKay NA, Schampel JH (1996). Organism size, life history, and N: P stoichiometry. BioScience, 46, 674–684. Crossref
[7] Elser JJ, O’Brien WJ, Dobberfuhl DR, Dowling TE (2000). The evolution of ecosystem processes: growth rate and elemental stoichiometry of a key herbivore in temperate and arctic habitats. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 13, 845–853. Crossref
[8] Falster DS, Warton DI, Wright IJ (2003). (S)MATR: Standardized Major Axis Tests and Routines. Version 1.0. http://www.bio.mq.edu.au/ecology/SMATR. Cited 25 Jan. 2013. Crossref
[9] Güsewell S (2004). N: P ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance. New Phytologist, 164, 243–266. Crossref
[10] Han WX, Fang JY, Reich PB, Woodward FI, Wang ZH (2011). Biogeography and variability of eleven mineral elements in plant leaves across gradients of climate, soil and plant functional type in China. Ecology Letters, 14, 788–796. Crossref
[11] Hessen DO, Jensen TC, Kyle M, Elser JJ (2007). RNA responses to N- and P-limitation: reciprocal regulation of stoichiometry and growth rate in Brachionus. Functional Ecology, 21, 956–962. Crossref
[12] Hessen DO, Lyche A (1991). Inter- and intraspecific variations in zooplankton element composition. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 121, 355–363. Crossref
[13] Karimi R, Folt CL (2006). Beyond macronutrients: element variability and multielement stoichiometry in freshwater invertebrates. Ecology Letters, 9, 1273–1283. Crossref
[14] Koerselman W, Meuleman AFM (1996). The vegetation N:P ratio: a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 33, 1441–1450. Crossref
[15] Koojiman SALM (1995). The stoichiometry of animal energetics. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 177, 139–149. Crossref
[16] Loladze I, Elser JJ (2011). The origins of the Redfield nitrogen- to-phosphorus ratio are in a homoeostatic protein-to-rRNA ratio. Ecology Letters, 14, 244–250. Crossref
[17] Makino W, Cotner JB, Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2003). Are bacteria more like plants or animals? Growth rate and resource dependence of bacterial C:N:P stoichiometry. Functional Ecology, 17, 121–130. Crossref
[18] Matzek V, Vitousek PM (2009). N:P stoichiometry and protein: RNA ratios in vascular plants: an evaluation of the growth-rate hypothesis. Ecology Letters, 12, 765–771. Crossref
[19] Meinke DW, Cherry JM, Dean C, Rounsley SD, Koornneef M (1998). Arabidopsis thaliana: a model plant for genome analysis. Science, 282, 662, 679–682. Crossref
[20] Niklas KJ (1994). Plant Allometry: the Scaling of form and Process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 7–34. Crossref
[21] Niklas KJ (2006). Plant allometry, leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry, and interspecific trends in annual growth rates. Annals of Botany, 97, 155–163. Crossref
[22] Niklas KJ, Cobb ED (2005). N, P, and C stoichiometry of Eranthis hyemalis (Ranunculaceae) and the allometry of plant growth. American Journal of Botany, 92, 1256–1263. Crossref
[23] Niklas KJ, Owens T, Reich PB, Cobb ED (2005). Nitrogen/phosphorus leaf stoichiometry and the scaling of plant growth. Ecology Letters, 8, 636–642. Crossref
[24] Rhee GY (1978). Effects of N: P atomic ratios and nitrate limitation on algal growth, cell composition, and nitrate uptake. Limnology and Oceanography, 23, 10–25. Crossref
[25] Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2002). Ecological Stoichiometry: the Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere. Princeton University Press, Princeton. 8. Crossref
[26] Sterner RW, Schulz KL (1998). Zooplankton nutrition: recent progress and a reality check. Aquatic Ecology, 32, 261–279. Crossref
[27] Watts T, Woods HA, Hargand S, Elser JJ, Markow TA (2006). Biological stoichiometry of growth in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Insect Physiology, 52, 187–193. Crossref
[28] Wu DX, Wei WS, Song CY (2012). Quality Assurance and Quality Control of Data for Long-term Biological Observation in Terrestrial Ecosystems. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing. 109–113. (in Chinese) [吴冬秀, 韦文珊, 宋创业 (2012). 陆地生态系统生物观测数据: 质量保证与控制. 中国环境科学出版社, 北京. 109–113.] Crossref
[29] Yu Q (2009). Ecological Stoichiometric Study on Vascular Plants in the Inner Mongolia Steppe. PhD dissertation, Institute of Botanty, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing. 56–67. (in Chinese with English abstract). [庾强 (2009). 内蒙古草原植物化学计量生态学研究. 博士学位论文, 中国科学院植物研究所, 北京. 56–67.] Crossref
[30] Yu Q, Wu HH, He NP, Lü XT, Wang ZP, Elser JJ, Wu JG, Han XG (2012). Testing the growth rate hypothesis in vascular plants with above- and below-ground biomass. PLoS ONE, 3(7), e32162. Crossref
[31] Zhang LX, Bai YF, Han XG (2004). Differential responses of N:P stoichiometry of Leymus chinensis and Carex korshinskyi to N additions in a steppe ecosystem in Nei Mongol. Acta Botanica Sinica, 46, 259–270.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Zheng Qi-cheng Zhu Yao-lan Chen Wen-hua Tang Xuan-min. Somaclonal Variation in Wheat[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1991, 8(增刊): 9 -14 .
[2] . [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2002, 19(01): 125 -127 .
[3] Lin Chun-jian. Polar Auxin Transport[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1996, 13(04): 1 -5 .
[4] Wang Chu-mao;Zhang Yi-an;Wu Zhen-xiang;Cui Chen;Chen Jian-rao and Zhuo Tie-han. The Effects of Polaris on Growth, Sucrose Accumulation and Yield of Sugarcane[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1985, 3(05): 9 -13 .
[5] Wang Hui-min Zhou Guang-sheng Wei Lin Xing Xue-rong. NPP Pattern of Chinses Pine Forest and Its Response to Climate Change[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1995, 12(专辑2): 102 -108 .
[6] Zhang Li-yun. The Characteristics of Aboveground Phytomass for A Haloxylon Persicum Phytocommunity[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1985, 3(03): 52 -54 .
[7] Shuirong Jian, Yong Wan, Xiangdong Luo, Jun Fang, Chengcai Chu, Jiankun Xie. Genetic Analysis of Cold Tolerance at the Seedling Stage in Dongxiang Wild Rice (Oryza rufipogon)[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2011, 46(1): 21 -27 .
[8] Baoda Han;Lixin Li. Seed Storage Proteins and Their Intracellular Transport and Processing[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2010, 45(04): 492 -505 .
[9] . [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1994, 11(专辑): 81 .
[10] YANG Qi-He SONG Song-Quan YE Wan-HuiYIN Shou-HuaT. Mechanism of Seed Photosensitivity and FactorsInfluencing Seed Photosensitivity[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2003, 20(02): 238 -247 .