Chin J Plan Ecolo ›› 2013, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (8): 777-785.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00081

• Research Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of phosphorus fertilizer on root morphology, physiological characteristics and yield in peanut (Arachis hypogaea)

ZHENG Ya-Ping*, XIN Cai-Yun*, WANG Cai-Bin**, SUN Xiu-Shan**, YANG Wei-Qiang, WAN Shu-Bo, ZHENG Yong-Mei, FENG Hao, CHEN Dian-Xu, SUN Xue-Wu, and WU Zheng-Feng   

  1. Shandong Peanut Research Institute, Qingdao 266100, China
  • Received:2013-02-26 Revised:2013-06-06 Online:2013-08-07 Published:2013-08-01
  • Contact: WANG Cai-Bin,SUN Xiu-Shan E-mail:caibinw@126.com

Abstract:

Aim Phosphorus (P) is one of the most important nutritional elements required by plants. The objective of our study was to evaluate the effects of P fertilizer on root morphology, physiological characteristics and yield of peanut (Arachis hypogaea).
Methods Pool experiments were conducted to elucidate the influence of phosphorus application on peanut. The root system under different phosphorus levels (P-level) was analyzed using a WinRHIZO system to quantify root volume and morphology. The following parameters were determined for all treatments: root activity, catalase (CAT) activity, concentration of soluble protein and malondialdehyde (MDA). Yield was recorded during the harvest period and analyzed using SPSS 13.0.
Important findings During the pod-filling stage, the length, volume, surface area and tip numbers of root increased with increasing P-level. When P2O5 was applied at 30–90 kg·hm–2, the above parameters increased by 3.5%–20.7%, 9.3%–21.9%, 9.7%–20.3% and 12.6%–21.4%, respectively, compared to the control (no P treatment) group. P-levels could affect enzyme activities. In P treatment group, the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD) and CAT was increased by 12.7%–20.6%, 14.8%–36.8% and 17.0%–41.8%, respectively. Some other parameters could be influenced by P availability, including increased root activity, soluble protein content nodule number and fresh nodule weight. In contrast, MDA content was decreased by 8.4%–19.5% after the P treatment. In the harvesting stage, all parameters decreased with increasing P-level, except the MDA content. But for most parameters, there were no statistically significant differences among treatments. The number of pods per plant, shelling percentage, economic coefficient and biological yield were enhanced with increasing P-level.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Hu Shi-yi. Lipoid Bodies in Plant Tissues[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1994, 11(04): 49 -51 .
[2] CHENG Hong-Yan. Introduction of State Key Laboratory of Biomembrane and Membrane Biotechnology[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1998, 15(04): 78 .
[3] Liu Dong-zhuo and Li Lan. The Karyotype Analysis of Solanum pseudocapsicum[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1992, 9(03): 50 .
[4] WANG Bao-Shan;LI De-Quan;ZHAO Shi-Jie;MENG Qing-Wei and ZOU Qi. Effects of Iso-osmotic NaCl and KCl Stress on Growth and Gas Exchange of Sorghum Seedlings[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1999, 16(04): 449 -453 .
[5] LI Yao-Dong WEI Yu-Ning XU Ben-Mei. Study on the ABA Content and SOD Activity in Ancient Lotus and Modern Lotus Seeds[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2000, 17(05): 439 -442 .
[6] LI Zhong-Kui HU Hong-Jun LI Ye-Guang. Advances in Molecular Phylogenetic Relationship of Volvocales[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2002, 19(04): 419 -424 .
[7] WANG Ting SU Ying-Juan ZHU Jian-Ming HUANG Chao LI Xue-Yan. PCR_RFLP Analysis of rbc L Genes in Taxaceae and Related Taxa[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2001, 18(06): 714 -721 .
[8] . [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1994, 11(专辑): 51 .
[9] Dong Shu-ting, Hu Chang-hao, Yue Shou-song, Wang Qun-ying, Gao Rong-qi, Pan Zi-long. The Characteristics of Canopy Photosynthesis of Summer Corn (Zea mays) and its Relation with Canopy Structure and Ecological Conditions[J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 1992, 16(4): 372 -378 .
[10] YANG Wei, YE Qi-Gang, LI Zuo-Zhou, HUANG Hong-Wen. GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION OF QUANTITATIVE TRAITS AND LOCAL ADAPTABILITY OF REMNANT POPULATIONS OF ISOETES SINENSIS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CONSERVATION AND GENETIC REINFORCEMENT[J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2008, 32(1): 143 -151 .