植物生态学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 262-268.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00262
• 研究论文 • 上一篇
刘华山1,2(), 左涛2, 韩锦峰2,**(
), 徐淑霞1, 张志勇2, 王晓军2, 袁仕豪3, 蒲文宣3, 易建华3,**(
)
收稿日期:
2011-07-06
接受日期:
2011-11-10
出版日期:
2012-07-06
发布日期:
2012-02-28
通讯作者:
韩锦峰,易建华
作者简介:
hnzyyjh@sina.com* E-mail: liuhs602@sina.com
LIU Hua-Shan1,2(), ZUO Tao2, HAN Jin-Feng2,**(
), XU Shu-Xia1, ZHANG Zhi-Yong2, WANG Xiao-Jun2, YUAN Shi-Hao3, PU Wen-Xuan3, YI Jian-Hua3,**(
)
Received:
2011-07-06
Accepted:
2011-11-10
Online:
2012-07-06
Published:
2012-02-28
Contact:
HAN Jin-Feng,YI Jian-Hua
摘要:
利用降解菌HN36降解土壤中的二氯喹啉酸及修复土壤的生态环境, 为稻田植烟地区烟叶安全生产提供技术和理论依据。采用盆栽试验, 将二氯喹啉酸与降解菌HN36配成一定量的溶液, 均匀喷洒到过筛的干土中, 将5叶期烟苗移栽到处理的塑料盆土中。当烟苗长到8叶期时分别取茎尖﹑顶叶和中部叶进行处理, 在电镜下观察细胞超微结构变化, 利用高效液相色谱仪检测土壤中二氯喹啉酸降解的动态。烟株细胞超微结构变化的程度有差异, 表现为受害烟株>修复烟株>健康烟株; 烟株的茎尖和顶叶细胞伤害最严重, 中部叶片细胞伤害较轻。研究结果还显示, 在含二氯喹啉酸的土壤中, 加入降解菌HN36能加速二氯喹啉酸降解, 改善土壤健康质量, 烟株细胞超微结构及烟叶品质明显得到修复。
刘华山, 左涛, 韩锦峰, 徐淑霞, 张志勇, 王晓军, 袁仕豪, 蒲文宣, 易建华. 降解菌HN36对二氯喹啉酸胁迫下烟草茎尖和叶片超微结构的影响. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(3): 262-268. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00262
LIU Hua-Shan, ZUO Tao, HAN Jin-Feng, XU Shu-Xia, ZHANG Zhi-Yong, WANG Xiao-Jun, YUAN Shi-Hao, PU Wen-Xuan, YI Jian-Hua. Effect of degrading bacterium HN36 on ultrastructure of flue-cured tobacco stem and leaves under quinclorac stress. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2012, 36(3): 262-268. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00262
图1 降解菌HN36对二氯喹啉酸胁迫下烟株茎尖细胞超微结构的影响。A, 健康烟株。B, 受害烟株。C, 修复烟株。D, 健康烟株。E, 受害烟株。F, 修复烟株。Ch, 叶绿体; Cw, 细胞壁; Nu, 细胞核; S, 淀粉粒; GL, 基粒片层。
Fig. 1 Effects of degrading bacterium HN36 on ultrastructure of tobacco stem tip cell under quinclorac stress. A, Normal plant. B, Phytoxicity plant. C, Repaired plant. D, Normal plant. E, Phytoxicity plant. F, Repaired plant. Ch, chloroplast; Cw, cell wall; Nu, cell nucleus; S, starch; GL, grana lamella.
图2 降解菌HN36对二氯喹啉酸胁迫下烟株顶叶细胞超微结构的影响。A, 健康烟株。B, 受害烟株。C, 修复烟株。D, 健康烟株。E, 受害烟株。F, 修复烟株。Ch, 叶绿体; Cw, 细胞壁; S, 淀粉粒。
Fig. 2 Effects of degrading bacterium HN36 on cell ultrastructure of tobacco tip leaves under quinclorac stress. A, Normal plant. B, Phytoxicity plant. C, Repaired plant. D, Normal plant. E, Phytoxicity plant. F, Repaired plant. Ch, chloroplast; Cw, cell wall; S, starch.
图3 降解菌HN36对二氯喹啉酸胁迫下烟株中部叶片细胞超微结构的影响。A, 健康烟株。B, 受害烟株。C, 修复烟株。D, 健康烟株。E, 受害烟株。F, 修复烟株。Ch, 叶绿体; GL, 基粒片层; S, 淀粉粒。
Fig. 3 Effects of degrading bacterium HN36 on ultrastructure of tobacco middle leaves cell under quinclorac stress. A, Normal plant. B, Phytoxicity plant. C, Repaired plant. D, Normal plant. E, Phytoxicity plant. F, Repaired plant. Ch, chloroplast; GL, grana lamella; S, starch.
处理 Treatment | 0 d | 15 d | 30 d | 45 d | 60 d | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
二氯喹啉酸 浓度 Quinclorac concentration | 降解率Degradation rate (%) | 二氯喹啉酸 浓度 Quinclorac concentration | 降解率Degradation rate (%) | 二氯喹啉酸 浓度 Quinclorac concentration | 降解率Degradation rate (%) | 二氯喹啉酸 浓度 Quinclorac concentration | 降解率Degradation rate (%) | 二氯喹啉酸浓度 Quinclorac concentration | 降解率 Degradation rate (%) | |||||
(mg·kg-1) | (mg·kg-1) | (mg·kg-1) | (mg·kg-1) | (mg·kg-1) | ||||||||||
T0 | 0.085 3 | 0 | 0.075 5 | 11.49 | 0.058 1 | 31.89 | 0.052 6 | 38.34 | 0.047 2 | 44.67 | ||||
T1 | 0.085 8 | 0 | 0.046 4 | 45.92 | 0.043 6 | 49.18 | 0.015 9 | 81.47 | 0.007 5 | 91.26 | ||||
T2 | 0.085 9 | 0 | 0.039 9 | 53.55 | 0.022 0 | 74.39 | 0.004 9 | 94.30 | - | 100.00 | ||||
T3 | 0.085 2 | 0 | 0.037 6 | 55.87 | 0.015 2 | 82.16 | 0.003 7 | 95.66 | - | 100.00 |
表1 不同量降解菌HN36对土壤中二氯喹啉酸降解率的影响
Table 1 Effects of degradation of quinclorac with different concentration of bacterium NH36
处理 Treatment | 0 d | 15 d | 30 d | 45 d | 60 d | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
二氯喹啉酸 浓度 Quinclorac concentration | 降解率Degradation rate (%) | 二氯喹啉酸 浓度 Quinclorac concentration | 降解率Degradation rate (%) | 二氯喹啉酸 浓度 Quinclorac concentration | 降解率Degradation rate (%) | 二氯喹啉酸 浓度 Quinclorac concentration | 降解率Degradation rate (%) | 二氯喹啉酸浓度 Quinclorac concentration | 降解率 Degradation rate (%) | |||||
(mg·kg-1) | (mg·kg-1) | (mg·kg-1) | (mg·kg-1) | (mg·kg-1) | ||||||||||
T0 | 0.085 3 | 0 | 0.075 5 | 11.49 | 0.058 1 | 31.89 | 0.052 6 | 38.34 | 0.047 2 | 44.67 | ||||
T1 | 0.085 8 | 0 | 0.046 4 | 45.92 | 0.043 6 | 49.18 | 0.015 9 | 81.47 | 0.007 5 | 91.26 | ||||
T2 | 0.085 9 | 0 | 0.039 9 | 53.55 | 0.022 0 | 74.39 | 0.004 9 | 94.30 | - | 100.00 | ||||
T3 | 0.085 2 | 0 | 0.037 6 | 55.87 | 0.015 2 | 82.16 | 0.003 7 | 95.66 | - | 100.00 |
处理 Treatment | 总糖 Total sugar | 还原糖 Reducing sugar | 淀粉 Starch | 总氮 Total nitrogen | 烟碱 Nicotine | 钾 Potassium |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
健康烟叶 Normal leaves (CK) | 18.85 | 17.46 | 7.63 | 2.02 | 2.15 | 1.72 |
受害烟叶 Phytoxicity leaves | 14.52 | 11.53 | 5.35 | 2.38 | 2.46 | 1.41 |
修复烟叶 Repaired leaves | 18.57 | 17.32 | 7.57 | 2.06 | 2.08 | 1.69 |
表2 降解菌HN36对二氯喹啉酸胁迫下烟叶主要化学成分的影响
Table 2 Effects of degrading bacterium HN36 on the main chemical composition of flue-cured tobacco leaves under quinclorac stress (%)
处理 Treatment | 总糖 Total sugar | 还原糖 Reducing sugar | 淀粉 Starch | 总氮 Total nitrogen | 烟碱 Nicotine | 钾 Potassium |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
健康烟叶 Normal leaves (CK) | 18.85 | 17.46 | 7.63 | 2.02 | 2.15 | 1.72 |
受害烟叶 Phytoxicity leaves | 14.52 | 11.53 | 5.35 | 2.38 | 2.46 | 1.41 |
修复烟叶 Repaired leaves | 18.57 | 17.32 | 7.57 | 2.06 | 2.08 | 1.69 |
[1] | Chen ZP (陈泽鹏), Deng JC (邓建朝), Wan SQ (万树青), Wang J (王静), Zhan ZS (詹振寿) (2007). Detoxication of some chemicals for deformity of tobacco by quinclorac. Ecology and Environment (生态环境), 16, 453-456. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[2] | Chen ZP (陈泽鹏), Wang J (王静), Wan SQ (万树青), Li HP (李华平), Chen JJ (陈建军), He DH (何东华), Li X (李行), Deng JC (邓建朝), Zhan S (詹寿), Wang WZ (王维专) (2004). Analysis and control of the abnormal growth of tobacco in areas in Guangdong. Acta Tabacaria Sinica (中国烟草学报), 10(3), 34-37. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[3] | Grossmann K (1998). Quinclorac belongs to a new class of highly selective auxin herbicides. Weed Science, 46, 707-716. |
[4] | Hu J (胡江), Dai XZ (代先祝), Li SP (李顺鹏) (2005). Bioremediation of atrazine in unsterilized soil by two atrazine degradation strains. Acta Pedologica Sinica (土壤学报), 42, 323-327. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[5] |
Lu ZM, Sang LY, Li ZM, Min H (2009). Catalase and superoxide dismutase activities in a Stenotrophomonas maltophilia WZ2 resistant to herbicide pollution. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 72, 136-143.
URL PMID |
[6] | Shang WJ (商文静), Wu YF (吴云锋), Zhao XM (赵小明), Du YG (杜昱光), Shang HS (商鸿生) (2007). Ultrastructure of induced resistance of tobacco to tobacco mosaic virus by chitooligosaccharides. Acta Phytopathologica Sinica (植物病理学报), 37, 56-61. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[7] | Shen B (沈标), Shao JS (邵劲松), Li SP (李顺鹏), Liu Z (刘智), Hong Q (洪青) (2002). Function of Pseudomonas sp. DLL-1 in soil bioremediation. China Environmental Science (中国环境科学), 22, 365-369. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[8] | Tang H (汤洪), Jin G (金刚), Wen ZZ (文宗振), Zhou RY (周瑞阳), Guan HX (关和新) (2008). Ultrastructure changes of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) leaf after glyphosate treatment. Journal of Guangxi Agricultural and Biological Science (广西农业生物科学), 27, 421-424. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[9] | Wang RX (王瑞新) (2003). Tobacco Chemistry (烟草化学). China Agriculture Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[10] | Yang JF (杨基峰), Yu YL (虞云龙), Fang H (方华), Wang X (王晓), Shan M (单敏) (2006). Bioremediation of soil polluted with metsulfuron-methyl. Environmental Chemistry (环境化学), 25, 76-79. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[11] | Yu HL (于红丽), Yao RQ (姚瑞芹), Xiao X (肖昕) (2010). The influence of copper stress on ultrastructure of wheat seedlings. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences (安徽农业科学), 38, 12658-12660. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[12] | Yu KL (宇克莉), Meng QM (孟庆敏), Zou JH (邹金华) (2010). Effects of Cd 2+ on seedling growth, chlorophyll contents and ultrastructures in maize . Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica (华北农学报), 25(3), 118-123. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] | Zabaloy MC, Garland JL, Gomez MA (2010). Assessment of the impact of 2, 4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2, 4-D) on indigenous herbicide-degrading bacteria and microbial community function in an agricultural soil. Applied Soil Ecology, 46, 240-246. |
[14] | Zhang JY (张景云), Bai YM (白雅梅), Yu M (于萌), Li WX (李文霞), Lü WH (吕文河) (2010). Leaf ultrastructure of diploid potato under salt stress. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University (东北农业大学学报), 41(8), 7-10. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[15] | Zhang XH, Zhang GS, Zhang ZH, Xu JH, Li SP (2006). Isolation and characterization of a dichlorvos-degrading strain DDV-1 of Ochrobactrum sp. Pedosphere, 16, 64-71. |
[16] | Zuo T (左涛), Liu HS (刘华山), Han JF (韩锦峰), Xu SX (徐淑霞), Wang XJ (王晓军), Yuan SH (袁仕豪), Pu WX (蒲文宣), Wang YF (汪耀富), Yi JH (易建华) (2010). Effects of degradation bacteria on reactive oxygen species and protective enzymes of tobacco leaves under quinclorac stress. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences (河南农业科学), 12(13), 36-39. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 叶学华, 薛建国, 谢秀芳, 黄振英. 外部干扰对根茎型克隆植物甘草自然种群植株生长及主要药用成分含量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(9): 951-961. |
[2] | 刘媛媛, 马进泽, 卜兆君, 王升忠, 张雪冰, 张婷玉, 刘莎莎, 付彪, 康媛. 地理来源与生物化学属性对泥炭地植物残体分解的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(7): 713-722. |
[3] | 张佳蕾, 郭峰, 孟静静, 于晓霞, 杨莎, 张思斌, 耿耘, 李新国, 万书波. 酸性土施用钙肥对花生产量和品质及相关代谢酶活性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(11): 1101-1109. |
[4] | 吴正锋, 孙学武, 王才斌, 郑亚萍, 万书波, 刘俊华, 郑永美, 吴菊香, 冯昊, 于天一. 弱光胁迫对花生功能叶片RuBP羧化酶活性及叶绿体超微结构的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(7): 740-748. |
[5] | 张佳蕾,李向东,杨传婷,高芳,张凤,王媛媛,孙莲强. 两种品质类型花生品质形成与子叶细胞超微结构的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(8): 768-776. |
[6] | 孙海峰, 李震宇, 武滨, 秦雪梅. 绿叶挥发物产生特征及其生态生理作用研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(3): 268-275. |
[7] | 刘俊, 陈贵青, 徐卫红, 韩桂琪, 张海波, 王慧先, 张明中. 锌对不同油菜品种的生理特性、光合作用、根尖细胞超微结构及籽粒锌积累的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(10): 1082-1094. |
[8] | 韦泽秀, 梁银丽, 山田智, 曾兴权, 周茂娟, 黄茂林, 吴燕. 不同水肥条件下番茄土壤微生物群落多样性及其与产量品质的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(3): 580-586. |
[9] | 王晨阳, 郭天财, 马冬云, 朱云集, 贺德先, 王永华. 环境、基因型及其互作对小麦主要品质性状的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(6): 1397-1406. |
[10] | 刘天学, 李潮海, 马新明, 赵霞, 刘士英. 不同基因型玉米间作对叶片衰老、籽粒产量和品质的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(4): 914-921. |
[11] | 常思敏, 马新明, 张贵龙, 熊淑萍, 詹克慧, 刘国顺. 砷对烤烟碳氮代谢及其产量和品质的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(4): 682-688. |
[12] | 马新明, 李春明, 袁祖丽, 熊淑萍. 铅污染对烤烟光合特性、产量及其品质的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(3): 472-478. |
[13] | 范雪梅, 姜东, 戴廷波, 荆奇, 曹卫星. 花后干旱或渍水逆境下氮素对小麦籽粒产量和品质的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(1): 71-77. |
[14] | 李永庚, 于振文, 梁晓芳, 赵俊晔, 邱希宾. 小麦产量和品质对灌浆期不同阶段低光照强度的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(5): 807-813. |
[15] | 白莉萍, 仝乘风, 林而达, 卢志光, 饶敏杰. 基于CTGC试验系统下面包小麦主要品质性状的研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(5): 814-818. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19