植物生态学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 914-921.DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.04.021
刘天学1,2, 李潮海1,*(), 马新明1, 赵霞1, 刘士英1
收稿日期:
2007-06-13
接受日期:
2007-07-23
出版日期:
2008-06-13
发布日期:
2008-07-30
通讯作者:
李潮海
作者简介:
*E-mail:lichaohai2005@yahoo.com.cn基金资助:
LIU Tian-Xue1,2, LI Chao-Hai1,*(), MA Xin-Ming1, ZHAO Xia1, LIU Shi-Ying1
Received:
2007-06-13
Accepted:
2007-07-23
Online:
2008-06-13
Published:
2008-07-30
Contact:
LI Chao-Hai
摘要:
采用大田试验, 研究了不同基因型玉米(Zea mays)间作对叶片衰老、籽粒产量和品质的影响。结果表明, ‘豫玉19’(YY19)与‘周单041’(ZD041)、‘郑单958’(ZD958)与‘鲁单981’(LD981)间作, 可提高叶片超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、过氧化物酶(POD)和过氧化氢酶(CAT)的活性, 降低丙二醛(MDA)含量, 延缓叶片衰老。具体表现为, 在吐丝后10 d, 4个玉米品种叶片中的SOD和POD活性均有所提高或显著提高, ZD041和ZD958叶片中的CAT活性提高或显著提高, YY19和LD981变化不显著; 4个玉米品种叶片中的MDA含量降低。在吐丝后40 d, SOD和POD活性及MDA含量的变化与吐丝后10 d基本一致, CAT活性均有所提高, 其中以YY19较为显著。研究还表明, 间作增加了复合群体产量, 土地当量比(Land equivalent ratio, LER)均大于1, 籽粒品质也有所改善。
刘天学, 李潮海, 马新明, 赵霞, 刘士英. 不同基因型玉米间作对叶片衰老、籽粒产量和品质的影响. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(4): 914-921. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.04.021
LIU Tian-Xue, LI Chao-Hai, MA Xin-Ming, ZHAO Xia, LIU Shi-Ying. EFFECTS OF MAIZE INTERCROPPING WITH DIFFERENT GENOTYPES ON LEAF SENESCENCE AND GRAIN YIELD AND QUALITY. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2008, 32(4): 914-921. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.04.021
图1 单间作玉米叶片SOD活性 YY19S: ‘豫玉19’单作 YY19 Sole-cropping YY19I: ‘豫玉19’间作 YY19 Intercropping ZD041S:‘周单041’单作 ZD041 Sole-cropping ZD041I: ‘周单041’间作 ZD041 Intercropping ZD958S: ‘郑单958’单作 ZD958 Sole-cropping ZD958I: ‘郑单958’间作 ZD958 Intercropping LD981S: ‘鲁单981’单作 LD981 Sole-cropping LD981I:‘鲁单981’间作 LD981 Intercropping YY19、ZD041、ZD958、LD981: 玉米品种 Maize varieties 图中不同小写字母表示差异显著(p<0.05) Different letters indicate different significantly(p<0.05)
Fig. 1 The SOD activities of leaves of maize on the treatments of sole-cropping and intercropping
处理 Treatments | 穗长 Ear length (cm) | 穗粗 Ear wide (cm) | 穗行数 Row number per ear | 行粒数 Grain number per row | 千粒重 1 000-kernel weight (g) | 穗粒重 Kernel weight per ear (g) | 产量 Yield (kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YY19S | 14.92±0.87b | 4.18±0.23b | 13.42±0.71a | 37.92±2.92a | 203.15±6.26b | 103.68±20.46c | 7 517.10±178.47c |
YY19I | 13.98±0.47b | 4.17±0.12b | 13.75±0.71a | 37.92±2.25a | 187.07±11.09b | 102.32±9.46c | 6 909.47±309.34c |
ZD041S | 17.51±0.85a | 4.49±0.36a | 14.75±0.71a | 40.36±3.08a | 175.78±10.29bc | 103.99±4.21c | 7 019.51±277.81c |
ZD041I | 18.45±0.71a | 4.55±0.03a | 13.93±0.71a | 42.55±1.35a | 198.64±13.05b | 117.47±10.71b | 7 929.25±311.67b |
ZD958S | 15.58±0.45b | 4.73±0.22a | 15.08±0.71a | 37.13±2.54ab | 235.47±19.37a | 131.74±13.15b | 8 596.11±232.07b |
ZD958I | 14.80±0.71b | 4.46±0.16a | 14.47±0.71a | 35.58±1.29b | 237.71±27.52a | 122.51±20.61b | 7 979.99±190.72b |
LD981S | 17.63±0.74a | 4.72±0.11a | 14.83±0.71a | 37.38±1.81ab | 250.06±9.05a | 138.58±6.92a | 9 354.25±102.45a |
LD981I | 18.04±0.41a | 4.95±0.54a | 14.50±0.71a | 39.25±0.91a | 261.26±16.77a | 148.60±7.01a | 10 030.46±307.51a |
表1 单间作玉米穗部性状与产量(平均值±标准误差)
Table 1 The ear characteristics and yield of maize on the treatments of sole-cropping and intercropping (mean ± SE)
处理 Treatments | 穗长 Ear length (cm) | 穗粗 Ear wide (cm) | 穗行数 Row number per ear | 行粒数 Grain number per row | 千粒重 1 000-kernel weight (g) | 穗粒重 Kernel weight per ear (g) | 产量 Yield (kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YY19S | 14.92±0.87b | 4.18±0.23b | 13.42±0.71a | 37.92±2.92a | 203.15±6.26b | 103.68±20.46c | 7 517.10±178.47c |
YY19I | 13.98±0.47b | 4.17±0.12b | 13.75±0.71a | 37.92±2.25a | 187.07±11.09b | 102.32±9.46c | 6 909.47±309.34c |
ZD041S | 17.51±0.85a | 4.49±0.36a | 14.75±0.71a | 40.36±3.08a | 175.78±10.29bc | 103.99±4.21c | 7 019.51±277.81c |
ZD041I | 18.45±0.71a | 4.55±0.03a | 13.93±0.71a | 42.55±1.35a | 198.64±13.05b | 117.47±10.71b | 7 929.25±311.67b |
ZD958S | 15.58±0.45b | 4.73±0.22a | 15.08±0.71a | 37.13±2.54ab | 235.47±19.37a | 131.74±13.15b | 8 596.11±232.07b |
ZD958I | 14.80±0.71b | 4.46±0.16a | 14.47±0.71a | 35.58±1.29b | 237.71±27.52a | 122.51±20.61b | 7 979.99±190.72b |
LD981S | 17.63±0.74a | 4.72±0.11a | 14.83±0.71a | 37.38±1.81ab | 250.06±9.05a | 138.58±6.92a | 9 354.25±102.45a |
LD981I | 18.04±0.41a | 4.95±0.54a | 14.50±0.71a | 39.25±0.91a | 261.26±16.77a | 148.60±7.01a | 10 030.46±307.51a |
YY19 | ZD041 | ZD958 | LD981 | YY19+ZD041 | ZD958+LD981 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LER | 0.919 | 1.130 | 0.928 | 1.072 | 1.130 | 1.003 |
表2 不同基因型玉米间作土地当量比
Table 2 The land equivalent ratio (LER) for maize intercropping with different genotypes
YY19 | ZD041 | ZD958 | LD981 | YY19+ZD041 | ZD958+LD981 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LER | 0.919 | 1.130 | 0.928 | 1.072 | 1.130 | 1.003 |
处理 Treatments | 淀粉 Starch (%) | 蛋白质 Protein (%) | 油分 Oil (%) | 赖氨酸 Lysine (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
YY19S+ZD041S | 71.444 | 9.378 | 4.246 | 0.218 |
YY19║ZD041 | 71.898 | 9.384 | 4.117 | 0.222 |
ZD958S+LD981S | 72.622 | 8.464 | 4.189 | 0.208 |
ZD958║LD981 | 73.107 | 8.551 | 4.004 | 0.199 |
表3 单间作玉米籽粒品质
Table 3 The grain qualities of maize on the treatments of sole-cropping and intercropping
处理 Treatments | 淀粉 Starch (%) | 蛋白质 Protein (%) | 油分 Oil (%) | 赖氨酸 Lysine (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
YY19S+ZD041S | 71.444 | 9.378 | 4.246 | 0.218 |
YY19║ZD041 | 71.898 | 9.384 | 4.117 | 0.222 |
ZD958S+LD981S | 72.622 | 8.464 | 4.189 | 0.208 |
ZD958║LD981 | 73.107 | 8.551 | 4.004 | 0.199 |
[1] | Bao JS (鲍巨松), Xue JQ (薛吉全), He YC (赫引川), Yang CS (杨成书), Hu XP (胡小平) (1992). Study on relationship between crown canopy of different populations of compact type corn and their material production. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica (西北农业学报), 1(2),25-29. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[2] | Braconnier S (1998). Maize-coconut intercropping: effects of shade and root competition on maize growth and yield. Agronomie, 18,373-382. |
[3] | Chen JX (陈建勋) (2002). Plant Physiology Experiment Guide (植物生理学实验指导). South China University of Technology Press, Guangzhou. (in Chinese) |
[4] | Chen SJ (陈绍江) (2004). Partner hybrid breeding for heterosis utilization of inter-hybrid in maize. Journal of Maize Sciences (玉米科学), 12(3),3-5. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[5] | Cui JM (崔俊明), Song CJ (宋长江), Lu DW (卢道文), Yang HY (杨海燕), Guo SY (郭素英), Pei ZQ (裴振群), Liu ZP (刘智萍), Lu LY (芦连勇), Sun HC (孙海潮), Niu YF (牛永锋), Zheng LM (郑丽敏) (2005). Planting techniques of long and short-stalked multistorey intercropping of different type maize hybrid. Rain Fed Crops (杂粮作物), 25,253-257. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[6] | Dong N (董宁), Yu CY (于长英), Li YL (李永禄) (2002). The mechanism and technique of increasing production for maize intercropping with different genotypes. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology (农业科技通讯), (8),10. (in Chinese) |
[7] | Dupraz C, Simorte V, Dauzat M, Bertoni G, Bernadac A, Masson P (1998). Growth and nitrogen status of young walnuts as affected by intercropped legumes in a Mediterranean climate. Agroforestry Systems, 43,71-80. |
[8] | Hoekstra GJ, Kannenberg LW, Christie BR (1985). Grain yield comparison of pure stands and equal proportion mixtures for seven hybrids of maize. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 65,471-479. |
[9] | Jolliffe PA, Wanjau FM (1999). Competition and productivity in crop mixtures: some properties of productive intercrops. Journal of Agricultural Science, 132,425-435. |
[10] | Letchworth MB, Lambert RJ (1998). Pollen parent effects on oil, protein, and starch concentration in maize kernels. Crop Science, 41,363-367. |
[11] | Li CH (李潮海), Su XH (苏新宏), Sun DL (孙敦立) (2002). Ecophysiological characterization of different maize ( Zea mays L.) genotypes under mono- or inter-cropping conditions . Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 22,2096-2103. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[12] | Li HS (李合生) (2000). Principles and Techniques of Plant Physiological Biochemical Experiment (植物生理生化实验原理和技术). Higher Education Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[13] | Liu XH (刘巽浩), Mou GZ (牟国正) (1993). The Farming System in China (中国耕作制度). China Agricultural Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[14] | Ogindo HO, Walker S (2005). Comparison of measured changes in seasonal soil water content by rainfed maize-bean intercrop and component cropping systems in a semi-arid region of southern Africa. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 30,799-808. |
[15] | Sekamatte BM (2001). Options for Integrated Management of Termites (Isoptera: Termitidae) in Smallholder Maize-Based Cropping Systems in Uganda. PhD dissercation, Makerere University, Uganda, 289. |
[16] | Sekamatte BM, Ogenga-Latigo M, Russell-Smith A (2003). Effects of maize-legume intercrops on termite damage to maize, activity of predatory ants and maize yields in Uganda. Crop Protection, 22,87-93. |
[17] | Shanghai Institute of Plant Physiology, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (中国科学院上海植物生理研究所), Shanghai Society for Plant Physiology (上海市植物生理学会) (1999). Modern Plant Physiology Experiment Guide (现代植物生理学实验指南). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[18] | Su XH (苏新宏), Li CH (李潮海), Sun DL (孙敦立), Zhang HZ (张怀志) (2000). Study on maize intercropping with different genotypes. Maize Sciences (玉米科学), 8(4),57-60. (in Chinese) |
[19] | Trenbath BR (1993). Intercropping for the management of pests and diseases. Field Crops Research, 34,381-405. |
[20] | Walker S, Ogindo HO (2003). The water budget of rain fed maize and bean intercrop. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 28,919-926. |
[21] | Zhao BQ (赵秉强), Li FC (李凤超), Li ZJ (李曾嘉), Zhang BR (张保仁) (1999). Study on the strip type of grain-vegetable inter-relay cropping. Acta Agronomica Sinica (作物学报), 25,356-362. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[22] | Zhao SJ (赵世杰), Liu HS (刘华山), Dong XC (董新纯) (1998). Plant Physiology Experiment Guide (植物生理学实验指导). China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[1] | 韩大勇 李海燕 张维 杨允菲. 松嫩草地全叶马兰种群分株养分的季节运转及衰老过程[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(预发表): 0-0. |
[2] | 刘建新, 刘瑞瑞, 刘秀丽, 贾海燕, 卜婷, 李娜. 外源硫化氢对盐碱胁迫下裸燕麦光合碳代谢的调控[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(3): 374-388. |
[3] | 陈林康 赵平 王顶 向蕊 龙光强. 玉米马铃薯秸秆混合腐解的非加性效应研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(12): 1728-1738. |
[4] | 熊淑萍, 曹文博, 曹锐, 张志勇, 付新露, 徐赛俊, 潘虎强, 王小纯, 马新明. 水平结构配置对冬小麦冠层垂直结构、微环境及产量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(2): 188-196. |
[5] | 孙浩哲, 王襄平, 张树斌, 吴鹏, 杨蕾. 阔叶红松林不同演替阶段凋落物产量及其稳定性的影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(6): 594-605. |
[6] | 叶学华, 薛建国, 谢秀芳, 黄振英. 外部干扰对根茎型克隆植物甘草自然种群植株生长及主要药用成分含量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(9): 951-961. |
[7] | 刘雪飞, 吴林, 王涵, 洪柳, 熊莉军. 鄂西南亚高山湿地泥炭藓的生长与分解[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(3): 228-235. |
[8] | 刘媛媛, 马进泽, 卜兆君, 王升忠, 张雪冰, 张婷玉, 刘莎莎, 付彪, 康媛. 地理来源与生物化学属性对泥炭地植物残体分解的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(7): 713-722. |
[9] | 刘璐, 赵常明, 徐文婷, 申国珍, 谢宗强. 神农架常绿落叶阔叶混交林凋落物动态及影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(6): 619-628. |
[10] | 朱启林, 向蕊, 汤利, 龙光强. 间作对氮调控玉米光合速率和光合氮利用效率的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(6): 672-680. |
[11] | 张鑫, 邢亚娟, 闫国永, 王庆贵. 细根对降水变化响应的meta分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(2): 164-172. |
[12] | 李义博, 宋贺, 周莉, 许振柱, 周广胜. C4植物玉米的光合-光响应曲线模拟研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(12): 1289-1300. |
[13] | 郑成岩, 邓艾兴, LATIFMANESHHojatollah, 宋振伟, 张俊, 王利, 张卫建. 增温对青藏高原冬小麦干物质积累转运及氮吸收利用的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(10): 1060-1068. |
[14] | 王丹, 乔匀周, 董宝娣, 葛静, 杨萍果, 刘孟雨. 昼夜不对称性与对称性升温对大豆产量和水分利用的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(8): 827-833. |
[15] | 赵文赛, 孙永林, 刘西平. 干旱-复水-再干旱处理对玉米光合能力和生长的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(6): 594-603. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19