植物生态学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11): 1033-1043.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0100 cstr: 32100.14.cjpe.2015.0100
所属专题: 碳循环
• • 下一篇
收稿日期:2015-02-02
接受日期:2015-08-13
出版日期:2015-11-01
发布日期:2015-12-02
作者简介:# 共同第一作者
基金资助:
WANG Xin-Qi, WANG Chuan-Kuan*(
), HAN Yi
Received:2015-02-02
Accepted:2015-08-13
Online:2015-11-01
Published:2015-12-02
About author:# Co-first authors
摘要:
树种通过改变凋落物输入与周转及根系活动影响 土壤的理化和生物学性质及固碳功能。合理选择树种是碳汇林业中一个亟待解决的理论和实践问题。为了减少林分特征和立地条件差异的影响, 2004年在相同气候、土壤和经营历史的立地上建立了东北地区常见树种同质园, 10年(2013-2014年)后测定了其中的3种阔叶树(白桦(Betula platyphylla)、胡桃楸(Juglans mandshurica)、水曲柳(Fraxinus mandshurica))和两种针叶树(落叶松(Larix gmelinii)、樟子松(Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica))人工纯林的土壤有机碳(SOC)及土壤容重、全氮、微生物生物量碳、微生物生物量氮、pH值等相关因子, 旨在比较探索树种对SOC含量及其垂直分布的影响。结果表明: (1)树种显著影响0-40 cm土层SOC总密度(p < 0.05)。其中, 0-10 cm土层SOC密度变化范围为2.79-3.08 kg·m-2, 表现为胡桃楸林>水曲柳林>白桦林>落叶松林>樟子松林; 10-20 cm土层变化范围为1.56-2.19 kg·m-2, 表现为樟子松林>胡桃楸林>水曲柳林>白桦林>落叶松林; 20-30 cm土层变化范围为1.17-2.10 kg·m-2, 表现为白桦林、水曲柳林显著高于其他树种纯林; 30-40 cm土层变化范围为0.84-1.43 kg· m-2, 表现为白桦林显著高于其他树种纯林。(2) SOC密度垂直分布格局因树种和土层而异。胡桃楸林、落叶松林0-10 cm土层SOC密度占0-40 cm土层总密度的相对量显著高于其他树种纯林, 白桦林20-40 cm土层的SOC密度相对量显著高于其他树种纯林, 这说明不同层次SOC密度的主控因子因树种而异。(3)不同树种纯林SOC浓度、容重差异显著, 且两者呈负相关。胡桃楸林、水曲柳林和落叶松林SOC密度与土壤微生物生物量、土壤pH值均呈正相关关系。5个树种纯林SOC密度均与全氮密度呈正相关关系。研究表明, 树种通过改变土壤理化性质和微生物活动而显著影响SOC密度, 不同树种SOC密度垂直变化格局可能是由不同树种在各个土层中的SOC密度主控因素不同所致。
王薪琪, 王传宽, 韩轶. 树种对土壤有机碳密度的影响: 5种温带树种同质园试验. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(11): 1033-1043. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0100
WANG Xin-Qi,WANG Chuan-Kuan,HAN Yi. Effects of tree species on soil organic carbon density: A common garden experiment of five temperate tree species. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2015, 39(11): 1033-1043. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0100
| 树种 Tree species | 基径 Basal diameter (cm) | 胸径 Diameter at breast height (cm) | 树高 Tree height (m) | 土壤全氮 Soil total nitrogen (g·kg-1) | 土壤pH值 Soil pH value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 白桦 Betula platyphylla | 10.64 ± 2.84 | 7.61 ± 2.13 | 10.07 ± 1.19 | 3.37 ± 0.11 | 4.64 ± 0.05 |
| 胡桃楸 Juglans mandshurica | 5.81 ± 2.90 | 3.63 ± 1.90 | 3.74 ± 1.79 | 3.54 ± 0.21 | 4.77 ± 0.04 |
| 水曲柳 Fraxinus mandshurica | 13.73 ± 16.60 | 7.50 ± 9.97 | 3.01 ± 2.10 | 3.63 ± 0.21 | 4.75 ± 0.05 |
| 落叶松 Larix gmelinii | 9.32 ± 2.97 | 7.46 ± 4.07 | 6.80 ± 1.48 | 3.16 ± 0.15 | 4.69 ± 0.06 |
| 樟子松 Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica | 9.75 ± 2.08 | 7.36 ± 3.49 | 4.66 ± 0.65 | 3.40 ± 0.11 | 4.79 ± 0.05 |
表1 五个树种纯林样地基本情况(平均值±标准偏差)
Table 1 Site characteristics in the monocultures of five tree species (mean ± SD)
| 树种 Tree species | 基径 Basal diameter (cm) | 胸径 Diameter at breast height (cm) | 树高 Tree height (m) | 土壤全氮 Soil total nitrogen (g·kg-1) | 土壤pH值 Soil pH value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 白桦 Betula platyphylla | 10.64 ± 2.84 | 7.61 ± 2.13 | 10.07 ± 1.19 | 3.37 ± 0.11 | 4.64 ± 0.05 |
| 胡桃楸 Juglans mandshurica | 5.81 ± 2.90 | 3.63 ± 1.90 | 3.74 ± 1.79 | 3.54 ± 0.21 | 4.77 ± 0.04 |
| 水曲柳 Fraxinus mandshurica | 13.73 ± 16.60 | 7.50 ± 9.97 | 3.01 ± 2.10 | 3.63 ± 0.21 | 4.75 ± 0.05 |
| 落叶松 Larix gmelinii | 9.32 ± 2.97 | 7.46 ± 4.07 | 6.80 ± 1.48 | 3.16 ± 0.15 | 4.69 ± 0.06 |
| 樟子松 Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica | 9.75 ± 2.08 | 7.36 ± 3.49 | 4.66 ± 0.65 | 3.40 ± 0.11 | 4.79 ± 0.05 |
图1 不同树种纯林0-40 cm土层土壤容重(A)、有机碳浓度(B)和有机碳密度(C)的比较(平均值±标准误差)。BH, 白桦林; HTQ, 胡桃楸林; LYS, 落叶松林; SQL, 水曲柳林; ZZS, 樟子松林。不同的小写字母分别代表树种间的显著性差异组别。
Fig. 1 Comparisons of soil bulk density (A), soil organic carbon concentration (B), and soil organic carbon density (C) among the monocultures of five tree species for 0-40 cm soil layer (mean ± SE). BH, HTQ, LYS, SQL, and ZZS represent Betula platyphylla, Juglans mandshurica, Larix gmelinii, Fraxinus mandshurica, and Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica, respectively. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among tree species.
图2 不同树种纯林土壤容重(A)、有机碳浓度(B)和有机碳密度(C)垂直变化的比较(平均值±标准误差)。BH, 白桦林; HTQ, 胡桃楸林; LYS, 落叶松林; SQL, 水曲柳林; ZZS, 樟子松林。不同的小写字母分别代表相同土层树种间的显著性差异组别, 未标字母的表示无显著性差异。
Fig. 2 Comparisons of the vertical changes in soil bulk density (A), soil organic carbon concentration (B), and soil organic carbon density (C) among the monocultures of five tree species (mean ± SE). BH, HTQ, LYS, SQL, and ZZS represent Betula platyphylla, Juglans mandshurica, Larix gmelinii, Fraxinus mandshurica, and Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica, respectively. Different lowercase letters within the same soil layers indicate significant differences among tree species, and the soil layers without designation of letters are not significantly different among groups.
图3 不同树种纯林土壤有机碳密度相对量的垂直变化(平均值±标准误差)。BH, 白桦林; HTQ, 胡桃楸林; LYS, 落叶松林; SQL, 水曲柳林; ZZS, 樟子松林。不同的小写字母分别代表树种间的显著性差异组别。
Fig. 3 Vertical changes in the percentage of soil organic carbon in each soil layer over the total soil organic carbon in the monocultures of five tree species (mean ± SE). BH, HTQ, LYS, SQL, and ZZS represent Betula platyphylla, Juglans mandshurica, Larix gmelinii, Fraxinus mandshurica, and Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica, respectively. Different lowercase letters within the same soil layers indicate significant differences among tree species.
图4 不同树种纯林土壤微生物生物量碳浓度(A)和密度(B)垂直变化的比较(平均值±标准误差)。BH, 白桦林; HTQ, 胡桃楸林; LYS, 落叶松林; SQL, 水曲柳林; ZZS, 樟子松林。不同的小写字母分别代表树种间的显著性差异组别, 未标字母的表示无显著性差异。
Fig. 4 Comparisons of the vertical changes in soil microbial biomass carbon concentration (A) and density (B) among the monocultures of five tree species (mean ± SE). BH, HTQ, LYS, SQL, and ZZS represent Betula platyphylla, Juglans mandshurica, Larix gmelinii, Fraxinus mandshurica, and Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica, respectively. Different lowercase letters within the same soil layers indicate significant differences among tree species, and the soil layers without designation of letters are not significantly different among groups.
![]() |
表2 不同树种纯林土壤有机碳浓度、密度与相关因子之间的Pearson相关系数
Table2 Pearson correlation coefficients among soil organic carbon concentration,soil organic carbon density and related factors in the monocultures of five tree species
![]() |
| 1 | Adam Langley J, Chapman SK, Hungate BA (2006). Ectomycorrhizal colonization slows root decomposition: The post-mortem fungal legacy.Ecology Letters, 9, 955-959. |
| 2 | Bauhus J, Paré D, Côté L (1998). Effects of tree species, stand age and soil type on soil microbial biomass and its activity in a southern boreal forest.Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 30, 1077-1089. |
| 3 | Bremner J, Mulvaney C (1982). Nitrogen-total. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR eds. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. American Society of Agronomy, Madison. 595-624. |
| 4 | Díaz-Pinés E, Rubio A, van Miegroet H, Montes F, Benito M (2011). Does tree species composition control soil organic carbon pools in Mediterranean mountain forests?Forest Ecology and Management, 262, 1895-1904. |
| 5 | Dijkstra FA, Fitzhugh RD (2003). Aluminum solubility and mobility in relation to organic carbon in surface soils affected by six tree species of the northeastern United States.Geoderma, 114, 33-47. |
| 6 | Ellert BH, Bettany JR (1995). Calculation of organic matter and nutrients stored in soils under contrasting management regimes.Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 75, 529-538. |
| 7 | Fontaine S, Barot S, Barré P, Bdioui N, Mary B, Rumpel C (2007). Stability of organic carbon in deep soil layers controlled by fresh carbon supply.Nature, 450, 277-280. |
| 8 | Fröberg M, Hansson K, Kleja DB, Alavi G (2011). Dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen leaching from Scots pine, Norway spruce and silver birch stands in southern Sweden.Forest Ecology and Management, 262, 1742-1747. |
| 9 | Guo ZL, Zheng JP, Ma YD, Li QK, Yu GR, Han SJ, Fan CN, Liu WD (2006). Researches on litterfall decomposition rates and model simulating of main species in various forest vegetations of Changbai Mountains, China.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 26, 1037-1046. |
| (in Chinese with English abstract) [郭忠玲, 郑金萍, 马元丹, 李庆康, 于贵瑞, 韩士杰, 范春楠, 刘万德 (2006). 长白山各植被带主要树种凋落物分解速率及模型模拟的试验研究. 生态学报, 26, 1037-1046.] | |
| 10 | Gurmesa GA, Schmidt IK, Gundersen P, Vesterdal L (2013). Soil carbon accumulation and nitrogen retention traits of four tree species grown in common gardens.Forest Ecology and Management, 309, 47-57. |
| 11 | Hagen-Thorn A, Callesen I, Armolaitis K, Nihlgård B (2004). The impact of six European tree species on the chemistry of mineral topsoil in forest plantations on former agricultural land.Forest Ecology and Management, 195, 373-384. |
| 12 | Han YY, Huang W, Sun T, Lu B, Mao ZJ (2015). Soil organic carbon stocks and fluxes in different age stands of secondary Betula platyphylla in Xiaoxing’an Mountain, China.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35, 1460-1469. |
| (in Chinese with English abstract) [韩营营, 黄唯, 孙涛, 陆彬, 毛子军 (2015). 不同林龄白桦天然次生林土壤碳通量和有机碳储量. 生态学报, 35, 1460-1469.] | |
| 13 | Hansson K, Helmisaari HS, Sah SP, Lange H (2013). Fine root production and turnover of tree and understorey vegetation in Scots pine, silver birch and Norway spruce stands in SW Sweden.Forest Ecology and Management, 309, 58-65. |
| 14 | Hobbie SE, Ogdahl M, Chorover J, Chadwick OA, Oleksyn J, Zytkowiak R, Reich PB (2007). Tree species effects on soil organic matter dynamics: The role of soil cation composition.Ecosystems, 10, 999-1018. |
| 15 | Jandl R, Lindner M, Vesterdal L, Bauwens B, Baritz R, Hagedorn F, Johnson DW, Minkkinen K, Byrne KA (2007). How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration?Geoderma, 137, 253-268. |
| 16 | Kelleher BP, Simpson AJ (2006). Humic substances in soils: Are they really chemically distinct?Environmental Science & Technology, 40, 4605-4611. |
| 17 | Laganière J, Paré D, Bergeron Y, Chen HYH (2012). The effect of boreal forest composition on soil respiration is mediated through variations in soil temperature and C quality.Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 53, 18-27. |
| 18 | Li Q, Ma DM, Liu YJ, Liu C, Chen MC (2008). Study on soil organic carbon and nutrients under the different planta- tions.Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 39, 1034-1037. |
| (in Chinese with English abstract) [李强, 马明东, 刘跃建, 刘闯, 陈暮初 (2008). 几种人工林土壤有机碳和养分研究. 土壤通报, 39, 1034-1037.] | |
| 19 | Li XF, Zhang Y, Niu LJ, Han SJ (2007). Litter decomposition processes in the pure birch (Betula platyphlla) forest and the birch and poplar (Populus davidiana) mixed forest.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 27, 1782-1790. |
| (in Chinese with English abstract) [李雪峰, 张岩, 牛丽君, 韩士杰 (2007). 长白山白桦(Betula platyphlla)纯林和白桦山杨(Populus davidiana)混交林凋落物的分解. 生态学报, 27, 1782-1790.] | |
| 20 | Liu SR, Wang H, Luan JW (2011). A review of research progress and future prospective of forest soil carbon stock and soil carbon process in China.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31, 5437-5448. |
| (in Chinese with English abstract) [刘世荣, 王晖, 栾军伟 (2011). 中国森林土壤碳储量与土壤碳过程研究进展. 生态学报, 31, 5437-5448.] | |
| 21 | Mareschal L, Bonnaud P, Turpault MP, Ranger J (2010). Impact of common European tree species on the chemical and physicochemical properties of fine earth: An unusual pattern.European Journal of Soil Science, 61, 14-23. |
| 22 | Mei L, Wang ZQ, Cheng YH, Han YZ, Zhang ZW (2008). Relationships between fine roots distribution and soil nitrogen availability in manchurian ash and korean larch plantation.Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 27, 117-121. |
| (in Chinese with English abstract) [梅莉, 王政权, 程云环, 韩有志, 张卓文 (2008). 水曲柳和落叶松细根分布与土壤有效氮的关系. 华中农业大学学报, 27, 117-121.] | |
| 23 | Mueller KE, Eissenstat DM, Hobbie SE, Oleksyn J, Jagodzinski AM, Reich PB, Chadwick OA, Chorover J (2012). Tree species effects on coupled cycles of carbon, nitrogen, and acidity in mineral soils at a common garden experiment.Biogeochemistry, 111, 601-614. |
| 24 | Neirynck J, Mirtcheva S, Sioen G, Lust N (2000). Impact of Tilia platyphyllos Scop., Fraxinus excelsior L., Acer pseudoplatanus L., Quercus robur L. and Fagus sylvatica L. on earthworm biomass and physico-chemical properties of a loamy topsoil.Forest Ecology and Management, 133, 275-286. |
| 25 | Ovington JD (1954). Studies of the development of woodland conditions under different trees. II. The forest floor.Journal of Ecology, 42, 71-80. |
| 26 | Ovington JD (1956). Studies of the development of woodland conditions under different trees. IV. The ignition loss, water, carbon and nitrogen content of the mineral soil.Journal of Ecology, 44, 171-179. |
| 27 | Parry ML, Canzian OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden P, Hanson CE (2007). Climate Change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 976. |
| 28 | Poeplau C, Don A, Vesterdal L, Leifeld J, van Wesemael B, Schumacher J, Gensior A (2011). Temporal dynamics of soil organic carbon after land-use change in the temperate zone—Carbon response functions as a model approach.Global Change Biology, 17, 2415-2427. |
| 29 | Rasse DP, Rumpel C, Dignac MF (2005). Is soil carbon mostly root carbon? Mechanisms for a specific stabilisation.Plant and Soil, 269, 341-356. |
| 30 | Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Modrzynski J, Mrozinski P, Hobbie SE, Eissenstat DM, Chorover J, Chadwick OA, Hale CM, Tjoelker MG (2005). Linking litter calcium, earthworms and soil properties: A common garden test with 14 tree species.Ecology Letters, 8, 811-818. |
| 31 | Shi W, Wang ZQ, Liu JL, Gu JC, Guo DL (2008). Fine root morphology of twenty hardwood species in Maoershan natural secondary forest in northeastern China. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version), 32, 1217-1226. |
| (in Chinese with English abstract) [师伟, 王政权, 刘金梁, 谷加存, 郭大立 (2008). 帽儿山天然次生林20个阔叶树种细根形态. 植物生态学报, 32, 1217-1226.] | |
| 32 | Song HC, Chen LH, Lü CJ, Gai XG, Wang PH (2012). Distribution characteristics and mechanical properties of Betula platyphylla roots in North China mountainous area.Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 24, 693-698. |
| (in Chinese with English abstract) [宋恒川, 陈丽华, 吕春娟, 盖小刚, 王萍花 (2012). 华北土石山区白桦根系分布特征及力学性能研究. 浙江农业学报, 24, 693-698.] | |
| 33 | Thomas GW (1996). Soil pH and soil acidity. In: Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH, Soltanpour PN, Tabatabai MA, Johnston CT, Sumner ME eds. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3. Chemical Methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison. 475-490. |
| 34 | Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987). An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C.Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 19, 703-707. |
| 35 | Vesterdal L, Clarke N, Sigurdsson BD, Gundersen P (2013). Do tree species influence soil carbon stocks in temperate and boreal forests?Forest Ecology and Management, 309, 4-18. |
| 36 | Vesterdal L, Elberling B, Christiansen JR, Callesen I, Schmidt IK (2012). Soil respiration and rates of soil carbon turnover differ among six common European tree species.Forest Ecology and Management, 264, 185-196. |
| 37 | Vesterdal L, Schmidt IK, Callesen I, Nilsson LO, Gundersen P (2008). Carbon and nitrogen in forest floor and mineral soil under six common European tree species.Forest Ecology and Management, 255, 35-48. |
| 38 | Wang H, Liu SR, Mo JM, Wang JX, Makeschin F, Wolff M (2010). Soil organic carbon stock and chemical composition in four plantations of indigenous tree species in subtropical China.Ecological Research, 25, 1071-1079. |
| 39 | Wellock ML, LaPerle CM, Kiely G (2011). What is the impact of afforestation on the carbon stocks of Irish mineral soils?Forest Ecology and Management, 262, 1589-1596. |
| 40 | Xu XF, Thornton PE, Post WM (2013). A global analysis of soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in terrestrial ecosystems.Global Ecology and Biogeography, 22, 737-749. |
| 41 | Yang H, Lou AR, Gao YJ, Song HT (2007). Life history characteristics and spatial distribution of the Betula platyphylla population in the Dongling Mountain region, Beijing, China. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version), 31, 272-282. |
| (in Chinese with English abstract) [杨慧, 娄安如, 高益军, 宋宏涛 (2007). 北京东灵山地区白桦种群生活史特征与空间分布格局. 植物生态学报, 31, 272-282.] | |
| 42 | Yang JY, Wang CK (2005). Soil carbon storage and flux of temperate forest ecosystems in northeastern China.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 25, 2875-2882. |
| (in Chinese with English abstract) [杨金艳, 王传宽 (2005). 东北东部森林生态系统土壤碳贮量和碳通量. 生态学报, 25, 2875-2882.] | |
| 43 | Zhu JJ, Kang HZ, Xu ML, Wu XY, Wang W (2007). Effects of ectomycorrhizal fungi on alleviating the decline of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantations on Keerqin sandy land.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 18, 2693-2698. |
| (in Chinese with English abstract) [朱教君, 康宏樟, 许美玲, 吴祥云, 王巍 (2007). 外生菌根真菌对科尔沁沙地樟子松人工林衰退的影响. 应用生态学报, 18, 2693-2698.] |
| [1] | 吴光进, 郭垚鑫, 任成杰, 王俊, 岳明, 赵发珠. 秦岭北麓不同植被类型土壤有机碳含量分布及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(预发表): 1-. |
| [2] | 封逸凡, 朱时应, 周淑荣, 江乐乐, 陈隆, 王苗, 邓国芳, 刘兰. 热带次生林恢复中土壤微生物对菌根化树苗存活和生长性状的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(预发表): 1-. |
| [3] | 姜庆宏, 丁露, 王哲, 郑春丽, 冯昭绰. 丛枝菌根真菌与不同功能细菌联用对苜蓿的促生作用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 774-788. |
| [4] | 何正嘉, 曾歆然, 王琳影, 薛昕宇, 苏钦泽, 李宇, 张寅杰, 吴辉煌, 陈成聪, 吴良泉, 魏安妮, 仇云鹏, 郭梨锦. 茶园丛枝菌根真菌群落和土壤有机碳对镁肥的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 700-709. |
| [5] | 李文竹, 栾军伟, 邸雅平, 王一, 聂秀青, 刘世荣. 模拟干旱对暖温带锐齿槲栎林菌根介导下土壤酶活性和土壤有机碳组分的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 660-673. |
| [6] | 杨密, 鲁梦珍, 冯治洋, 袁旭东, 赵小祥, 刘峰, 田秋香. 亚热带森林土壤磷有效性与外生菌根优势度的关联分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 639-648. |
| [7] | 张静, 陈洁, 李艳朋, 盘李军, 许涵, 李意德, 何海生. 南亚热带针阔混交人工林植物生物量比较及其影响因子分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(2): 400-416. |
| [8] | 王爽, 陈雅轩, 陈艳梅, 王佳乐, 刘倩愿. 太行山典型区不同生境酸枣根系资源获取策略[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(2): 374-387. |
| [9] | 朱瑞德, 杨俊薇, 刘宵含, 陈冰瑞, 池秀莲, 田地, 杨光, 程蒙, 戴亚峰, 王诗文. 霍山石斛设施和林下栽培模式中养分对植物-微生物关联的调控[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1434-1447. |
| [10] | 张法伟, 李红琴, 祝景彬, 樊博, 周华坤, 李英年, 梁乃申. 氮添加和降水改变对高寒草甸生态系统地上与地下碳储的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1399-1409. |
| [11] | 范亚冉, 夏少攀, 于冰冰, 朱紫琪, 杨威, 范豫川, 刘晓雨, 张旭辉, 郑聚锋. 大气CO2浓度升高和增温对土壤有机碳库积累、分子组成和结构稳定性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(7): 1053-1069. |
| [12] | 李欣怡, 张丽芳, 吴友贵, 郭静, 兰荣光, 吕洪飞, 于明坚. 不同海拔高度下百山祖冷杉幼苗的生长特征及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(4): 610-623. |
| [13] | 李冬梅, 孙龙, 韩宇, 胡同欣, 杨光, 蔡慧颖. 计划火烧对红松人工林生物多样性与生态系统多功能性关系的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(3): 379-392. |
| [14] | 徐源, 谭卓然, 殷缘, 化佳敏, 韩迎新, 蔺吉祥, 王傲, 王竞红. 入侵植物对土壤特性影响的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(11): 1767-1777. |
| [15] | 胡璟, 吕世琪, 李冰, 马志波, 符利勇, 殷建章, 肖玖金, 闫佳源, 胡宗达. 温带过渡区4种典型天然林土壤有机碳组分与碳库管理指数变化特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(11): 1957-1972. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2026 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19