植物生态学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 33-39.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0005 cstr: 32100.14.cjpe.2006.0005
旷远文1,2(
), 温达志1,*(
), 周国逸1, 张德强1
收稿日期:2004-08-12
接受日期:2005-05-24
出版日期:2006-08-12
发布日期:2006-01-30
作者简介:*E-mail:dzwen@scbg.ac.cn基金资助:
KUANG Yuan-Wen1,2(
), WEN Da-Zhi1,*(
), ZHOU Guo-Yi1, ZHANG De-Qiang1
Received:2004-08-12
Accepted:2005-05-24
Online:2006-08-12
Published:2006-01-30
摘要:
利用植物体元素化学分析结果来诊断环境污染对森林健康影响和监测环境污染程度已成为诸多生态学家和环境学者广为采用的方法之一。该研究选择广东肇庆鼎湖山健康马尾松(Pinus massoniana)前年生针叶和当年生针叶为研究对象, 将相同年龄针叶分为叶尖、叶中、叶基等长3段, 分析了两种针叶全S、全P、K、Mg、Na、Ca、Al、Mn、Zn、Cu、Fe、Pb、Cr、Cd和Ni15种元素及相应Ca/Al值在叶尖、叶中部、叶基部和叶鞘的分布模式。结果表明: 前年生针叶元素平均值除全S、全P、K和Cd外, 其它元素浓度都高于当年生针叶, Ca/Al值则是当年生针叶小于前年生针叶, 表明当年生针叶受Al毒大于前年生针叶; 在针叶长度序列不同部位间, 元素分布不均匀, 全S、Na、Ca、Al和Mn在两种针叶长度序列上没有显著性差异, K、Mg、Zn、Fe、Cr、Cd、Ni和Ca/Al值差异均达显著水平, 而全P、Cu、Cd和Pb仅在前年生针叶不同部位间差异显著; 针叶Al浓度和Ca/Al值都表明马尾松已经处于严重Al毒胁迫下; 两种针叶各部位Fe、Zn和Cu浓度远超出该地区马尾松元素的背景值, 暗示马尾松针叶已受到严重重金属毒害; 马尾松叶鞘Fe、Cu、Zn、Pb、Cd、Ni和Cr含量显著高于针叶其它部位, 表明叶鞘能累积环境重金属, 可以作为马尾松在污染环境下遭受重金属危害指标加以利用, 是一种有广泛应用前景的生物指示物。该研究所采用的技术和方法对环境监测, 尤其是对利用生物化学方法评价环境污染对森林健康影响评价体系的完善和生物监测指标的利用具有指导意义, 可为今后评估相似环境污染地区森林健康和树木正常生长提供参考。
旷远文, 温达志, 周国逸, 张德强. 鼎湖山异龄马尾松针叶长度序列元素分布. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(1): 33-39. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0005
KUANG Yuan-Wen, WEN Da-Zhi, ZHOU Guo-Yi, ZHANG De-Qiang. DISTRIBUTION OF ELEMENTS ALONG THE LENGTH OF DIFFERENT-AGED NEEDLES OF PINUS MASSONIANA AT DINGHUSHAN. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2006, 30(1): 33-39. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0005
| 元素 Element | 当年生叶 Current year | 前年生叶Previous year | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 针叶Needle | 叶鞘Sheath | 针叶Needle | 叶鞘Sheath | |||
| S | 0.05±0.02 | 0.16±0.11 | 0.04±0.02** | 0.05±0.02** | ||
| P | 0.06±0.01 | 0.05±0.02 | 0.03±0.00** | 0.05±0.02 | ||
| K | 2 005.8±743.3 | 2 256.9±953.7 | 1 074.5±789.8** | 1 816.2±351.0 | ||
| Mg | 937.4±252.2 | 1 090.5±225.5 | 1348.0±566.8** | 1 578.9±365.2 | ||
| Na | 295.1±53.7 | 295.2±57.0 | 305.5±66.9 | 322.4±56.2 | ||
| Ca | 1 465.1±743.5 | 1 315.3±753.4 | 3 982.7±587.2** | 2 801.7±60.6* | ||
| Al | 280.8±133.7 | 537.6±90.7 | 540.7±231.7* | 1 517.6±504.1* | ||
| Mn | 313.2±155.2 | 333.4±69.1 | 370.9±192.4 | 279.1±78.1 | ||
| Zn | 34.5±10.2 | 54.6±8.3 | 76.7±25.1** | 116.3±26.7** | ||
| Cu | 15.9±5.0 | 18.1±4.5 | 16.0±9.2 | 57.5±12.8** | ||
| Fe | 143.6±54.8 | 458.0±204.9 | 284.9±99.8** | 1 063.3±337.4** | ||
| Pb | 2.57±1.73 | 5.9±2.6 | 4.13±2.10* | 12.6±3.2** | ||
| Cr | 2.32±1.42 | 4.71±0.48 | 3.73±1.60** | 20.2±11.2* | ||
| Cd | 0.17±0.15 | 0.32±0.09 | 0.11±0.04 | 0.43±0.16 | ||
| Ni | 0.30±0.21 | 0.30±0.08 | 0.30±0.22** | 1.27±0.19** | ||
| Ca/Al | 5.89±2.80 | 3.35±2.11 | 8.53±4.17** | 2.09±0.43** | ||
表1 马尾松异龄针叶及叶鞘元素平均含量±标准差和Ca/Al值
Table 1 Mean±SD values of elements and Ca/Al ratio in the whole needles
| 元素 Element | 当年生叶 Current year | 前年生叶Previous year | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 针叶Needle | 叶鞘Sheath | 针叶Needle | 叶鞘Sheath | |||
| S | 0.05±0.02 | 0.16±0.11 | 0.04±0.02** | 0.05±0.02** | ||
| P | 0.06±0.01 | 0.05±0.02 | 0.03±0.00** | 0.05±0.02 | ||
| K | 2 005.8±743.3 | 2 256.9±953.7 | 1 074.5±789.8** | 1 816.2±351.0 | ||
| Mg | 937.4±252.2 | 1 090.5±225.5 | 1348.0±566.8** | 1 578.9±365.2 | ||
| Na | 295.1±53.7 | 295.2±57.0 | 305.5±66.9 | 322.4±56.2 | ||
| Ca | 1 465.1±743.5 | 1 315.3±753.4 | 3 982.7±587.2** | 2 801.7±60.6* | ||
| Al | 280.8±133.7 | 537.6±90.7 | 540.7±231.7* | 1 517.6±504.1* | ||
| Mn | 313.2±155.2 | 333.4±69.1 | 370.9±192.4 | 279.1±78.1 | ||
| Zn | 34.5±10.2 | 54.6±8.3 | 76.7±25.1** | 116.3±26.7** | ||
| Cu | 15.9±5.0 | 18.1±4.5 | 16.0±9.2 | 57.5±12.8** | ||
| Fe | 143.6±54.8 | 458.0±204.9 | 284.9±99.8** | 1 063.3±337.4** | ||
| Pb | 2.57±1.73 | 5.9±2.6 | 4.13±2.10* | 12.6±3.2** | ||
| Cr | 2.32±1.42 | 4.71±0.48 | 3.73±1.60** | 20.2±11.2* | ||
| Cd | 0.17±0.15 | 0.32±0.09 | 0.11±0.04 | 0.43±0.16 | ||
| Ni | 0.30±0.21 | 0.30±0.08 | 0.30±0.22** | 1.27±0.19** | ||
| Ca/Al | 5.89±2.80 | 3.35±2.11 | 8.53±4.17** | 2.09±0.43** | ||
图1 马尾松当年生针叶(■)和前年生针叶(□)各部位全S和全P百分含量 同龄组针叶不同部位间元素含量差异显著时以不同字母表示 T: 叶尖 Needle tip M: 叶中部 Middle section B: 叶基部 Base section S: 叶鞘 Sheath
Fig.1 The percentages of total S and total P along the current year needle (■) and the previous year needle (□) of Pinus massoniana, respectively Different letters represent the significant difference among the sections of the same age class needles (p=0.05, n=6)
图2 马尾松当年生针叶(■)和前年生针叶(□)各部位元素浓度格局 同龄组针叶不同部位间元素含量差异显著时以不同字母表示 同图1
Fig.2 The distributing patterns of elements along the current year(■) and previous year (□)needles of Pinus massoniana, respectively Different letters represent the significant difference among the sections of the same age class needles (p=0.05, n=6) T, M, B, S: See Fig. 1
| [1] | Bao WK (包维楷) (1999). Degraded features of Pinrus massoniana forest stressed by compound-pollution due to particulartes, SO 2 and NO x. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 23,501-509. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [2] |
Dmuchowski W, Bytnerowicz A (1995). Monitoring environmental pollution in Poland by chemical analysis of Scots pine ( Pinus sylvestris L.) needles. Environmental pollution, 87,87-104.
DOI URL PMID |
| [3] | Dong M (董鸣) (1996). Survey, Observation and Analysis of Terrestrial Biocommunities (陆地生物群落调查观测与分析). Standards Press of China, Beijng,154-159. (in Chinese) |
| [4] | Ewa U, Kurczyńska WD, Wielaw W (1997). The influence of air pollutants on needles and stems of Scots pine ( Pinus sylvestris L) trees. Environmental Pollution, 98,325-334. |
| [5] | Figueira R, Sérgio C, Sousa AJ (2002). Distribution of trace metals in moss biomonitors and assessment of contamination sources in Portugal. Environmental Pollution, 118,153-163. |
| [6] |
Giertych MJ, de Temmerman LO, Rachwol L (1997). Distribution of elements along the length of Scots pine needles in a heavily polluted and a control environment. Tree Physiology, 17,697-703.
DOI URL PMID |
| [7] |
Helmisaari HS (1992). Nutrient retranslocation within the foliage of Pinus sylvestris. Tree Physiology, 10,45-48.
DOI URL PMID |
| [8] | Jamrich V (1972). The localization, accumulation and binding of fluorine from industrial fumes in the tissues of the organs of Pinus sylvestris. Zbornik Vedeckych Prac VSLD vo Zwolene, 14,89-99. |
| [9] | Kurczynska EU, Dmuchowski W, Wloch W, Bytnerowicz A (1997). The influence of air pollutants on needle and stems of Scots pine ( Pinus sylvestris L.) trees. Environmental Pollution, 98,325-334. |
| [10] | Li J (李健), Zheng CJ (郑春江) (1989). Handbook of Data for Environmental Background Values (环境背景值数据手册). Chinese Environmental Science Press, Beijing,200-216. (in Chinese) |
| [11] | Luo TS (骆土寿), Wu ZM (吴仲民), Xu YG (徐义刚), Zhou GY (周光益), He ZC (何在成) (2001). Preliminary studies on the effect of atmosphere pollution on forest and soil in Pearl River Delta, China. Ecologic Science (生态科学), 20,11-16. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [12] |
Percy KE, Ferretti M (2004). Air pollution and forest health: toward new monitoring concepts. Environmental Pollution, 130,113-126.
DOI URL PMID |
| [13] |
Rautio P, Huttunen S (2003). Total vs. internal element concentrations in Scot pine needles along a sulphur and metal pollution gradient. Environmental Pollution, 122,273-289.
URL PMID |
| [14] | Rengel Z (1992). Role of calcium in aluminium toxicity. New Phytologist, 121,499-513. |
| [15] |
Shparyk YS, Parpan VI (2004). Heavy metal pollution and forest health in Ukrainian Carpathians. Environmental Pollution, 130,55-63.
DOI URL PMID |
| [16] | Svoboda L, Zimmermannová K, Kalac P (2000). Concentrations of mercury, cadmium, lead and copper in fruiting bodies of edible mushrooms in an emission area of a copper smelter and a mercury smelter. Science of Total Environment, 246,61-67. |
| [17] | Wen DZ (温达志), Kuang YW (旷远文), Liu SZ (刘世忠), Lu YD (陆耀东), Li JL (黎建力) (2003). Vegetation damage by long-term air pollution at a rural site in the Pearl River Delta in South China. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany (热带亚热带植物学报), 11,386-392. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [18] | Yan CR (严昌荣), Zhu ZB (朱忠保) (1996). Declining of Pinus massoniana in relation to air pollution in Dasheng, Lengshuijiang, Hunan. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 20,207-215. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [19] | Yilmaz S, Zengin M (2004). Monitoring environmental pollution in Erzurum by chemical analysis of Scots pine ( Pinus sylvestris L) needles. Environmental international, 29,1041-1047. |
| [1] | 夏琦, 聂秀青, 陈轶群, 刘世荣. 南亚热带纯林和混交林根系分泌物代谢组学分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(1): 188-201. |
| [2] | 赵常明, 熊高明, 申国珍, 葛结林, 徐文婷, 徐凯, 武元帅, 谢宗强. 2010年神农架常绿落叶阔叶混交林和亚高山针叶林长期监测样地植物物种组成和群落特征数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(8): 1215-1228. |
| [3] | 刘世忠, 张倩媚, 张德强, 刘菊秀, 褚国伟, 李跃林. 1999-2015年鼎湖山季风常绿阔叶林长期监测样地植物物种组成和群落特征数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(8): 1205-1214. |
| [4] | 曹毅, 张松林, 王旭峰, 杨安昌, 任敏慧, 杨浩, 韩超. 兰州市南北两山植物群落数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(6): 975-989. |
| [5] | 何斌, 韩鹏宾, 唐勤. 中国铁坚油杉林的群落类型及特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(6): 833-839. |
| [6] | 张英, 张常洪, 汪其同, 朱晓敏, 尹华军. 氮沉降下西南山地针叶林根际和非根际土壤固碳贡献差异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(9): 1234-1244. |
| [7] | 李卫英, 章正仁, 辛雅萱, 王飞, 辛培尧, 高洁. 云南松、思茅松和卡西亚松天然种群间的针叶表型变异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(6): 833-846. |
| [8] | 赖硕钿, 吴福忠, 吴秋霞, 朱晶晶, 倪祥银. 雪被去除减缓岷江冷杉凋落叶易分解碳释放[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(5): 672-686. |
| [9] | 郑炀, 孙学广, 熊洋阳, 袁贵云, 丁贵杰. 叶际微生物对马尾松凋落针叶分解的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(5): 687-698. |
| [10] | 何茜, 冯秋红, 张佩佩, 杨涵, 邓少军, 孙小平, 尹华军. 基于叶片和土壤酶化学计量的川西亚高山岷江冷杉林养分限制海拔变化规律[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(12): 1646-1657. |
| [11] | 樊凡, 赵联军, 马添翼, 熊心雨, 张远彬, 申小莉, 李晟. 川西王朗亚高山暗针叶林25.2 hm2动态监测样地物种组成与群落结构特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 1005-1017. |
| [12] | 张英, 张常洪, 汪其同, 朱晓敏, 尹华军. 氮沉降下西南山地针叶林根际和非根际土壤微生物养分限制特征差异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(4): 473-483. |
| [13] | 张自琰, 金光泽, 刘志理. 不同区域针叶年龄对红松叶性状及相关关系的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(3): 253-264. |
| [14] | 王兆鹏, 张同文, 袁玉江, 张瑞波, 喻树龙, 刘蕊, 石仁娜•加汗, 郭冬, 王勇辉. 罗霄山南部4个针叶树种生长特征及其气候响应对比分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(12): 1303-1313. |
| [15] | 罗斯生, 罗碧珍, 魏书精, 胡海清, 李小川, 吴泽鹏, 王振师, 周宇飞, 钟映霞. 中度强度森林火灾对马尾松次生林土壤有机碳密度的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(10): 1073-1086. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2026 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19