常绿阔叶林谱系多样性对幼苗存活率的影响

doi:10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2009.06.008

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

密度制约机制对于维护生物多样性有非常重要的作用。随着对密度制约机制的深入研究, 人们逐渐认识到: 不仅在种内存在密度制约效应, 亲缘关系相近的物种之间也可能表现出密度制约效应。Webb在2000年提出的NRI (净种间亲缘关系指数)、NTI (净最近种间亲缘关系指数)考虑了比较全面的谱系信息, 获得了广泛的应用。该文采用NRI、NTI来代表种间关系, 并用Logistic回归模型来分析了谱系因子对浙江省开化县古田山自然保护区24 hm²永久监测样地中501个幼苗样方死亡率的影响。通过对6次幼苗调查数据的分析表明: 不仅相同物种密度对于幼苗的死亡率有显著影响, 当密度达到一定水平时, 谱系因子同样也对幼苗的死亡率有显著影响——苗区中个体间的亲缘关系越近, 幼苗个体的死亡率越高。

关键词: 密度制约, 谱系多样性, 净种间亲缘关系指数, Logistic回归, 幼苗死亡率

Abstract:

Aims Negative density dependence plays an important role in maintaining forest biodiversity. Ecologists found this mechanism operates not only between conspecifics but also between closely related heterospecifics. Our objective was to determine whether phylogenetic diversity affects seedling mortality at different scales.
Methods We used net relatedness index (NRI) and nearest taxon index (NTI) to represent phylogenetic diversity and employed logistic regression modeling. We analyzed the relationship between seedling mortality and phylogenetic diversity using the seedling dynamic data from six seedling censuses of 507 seedling plots at Gutianshan Nature Reserve during May 2006 and November 2007.
Important findings We found that higher density of conspecifics resulted in higher seedling mortality, and phylogenetic diversity was responsible for seedling mortality when seedling density was high (>3.46 individuals·m^-2).

Key words: negative density dependence, phylogenetic diversity, net relatedness index, logistic regression, seedling mortality

陈英. 常绿阔叶林谱系多样性对幼苗存活率的影响. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(6): 1084-1089. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2009.06.008

CHEN Ying. DETECTING EFFECT OF PHYLOGENETIC DIVERSITY ON SEEDLING MORTALITY IN AN EVERGREEN BROAD-LEAVED FOREST IN CHINA. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2009, 33(6): 1084-1089. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2009.06.008

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2009.06.008

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2009/V33/I6/1084

图/表 3

参考文献 14

[1]	Bell T, Freckleton RP, Lewis OT (2006). Plant pathogens drive density-dependent seedling mortality in a tropical tree. Ecology Letters, 9,569-574. URL PMID
[2]	Faith DP (1992). Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biology Conservation, 61,1-10.
[3]	Gilbert GS, Webb CO (2007). Phylogenetic signal in plant pathogen-host range. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104,4979-4983. DOI URL PMID
[4]	Harms KE, Dalling JW (2000). A bruchid beetle and a viable seedling from a single diaspore of Attalea butyracea. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 16,319-325.
[5]	Helmus MR, Bland TJ, Williams CK, Ives AR (2007). Phylogenetic measures of biodiversity. American Naturalist, 169,E68-E83.
[6]	Hu ZH (胡正华), Yu MJ (于明坚), Fang T (方腾), Ding BY (丁炳扬), Qian HY (钱海源) (2003). The community characteristics of evergreen broad -leaved forest in Gutian Mountain Natural Reserve of Zhejiang. Journal of Nanjing Institute of Meteorology (南京气象学院学报), 26,63-69. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	Krug AZ, Jablonski D, Valentine JW (2008). Species-genus ratios reflect a global history of diversification and range expansion in marine bivalves. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 275(1639),1117-1123.
[8]	Peters HA (2003). Neighbour-regulated mortality: the influence of positive and negative density dependence on tree populations in species-rich tropical forests. Ecology Letters, 6,757-765.
[9]	R Development Core Team (2008). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.
[10]	Webb CO, Ackerly DD, Kembel SW (2008). Phylocom: software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and character evolution. Version 4.0. URL:http://phylodiversity.net/phylocom/.
[11]	Webb CO, Ackerly DD, McPeek MA, Donoghue MJ (2002). Phylogenies and community ecology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33,475-505.
[12]	Webb CO, Gilbert GS, Donoghue MJ (2006). Phylodiversity-dependent seedling mortality, size structure, and disease in a bornean rain forest. Ecology, 87,S123-S131.
[13]	Wright SJ (2002). Plant diversity in tropical forests: a review of mechanisms of species coexistence. Oecologia, 130,1-14. DOI URL PMID
[14]	Wu ZY (吴征镒) (1980). Vegetation of China(中国植被). Science Press,Beijing. (in Chinese)

调查时间 Investigating time (Year-month)	幼苗总数 Total no. of seedlings	苗区平均幼苗数(棵) Average no. of seedlings in a plot
2006-5	1 100	3.46
2006-8	1 377	3.45
2006-11	1 352	3.40
2007-5	4 920	10.21
2007-8	1 793	4.21

调查时间 Investigating time (Year-month)	幼苗总数 Total no. of seedlings	苗区平均幼苗数(棵) Average no. of seedlings in a plot
2006-5	1 100	3.46
2006-8	1 377	3.45
2006-11	1 352	3.40
2007-5	4 920	10.21
2007-8	1 793	4.21

时间/尺度 Time/Scale	模型 Model	回归系数+显著水平 Coefficient+significance
时间/尺度 Time/Scale	模型 Model	Ln (同种密度) Ln (conspecies density)	净种间亲缘关系指数 NRI	净最近种间亲缘关系指数 NTI	赤沲信息量准则 AIC
07.05/苗区 07.05/Plot	A	0.76 ***			4 083.2
	B	0.74 ***	0.32 ***		4 038.1
	C	0.74 ***		0.33 ***	4 043.9
07.05/样站 07.05/Site	A	0.79 ***			3 613.7
	B	0.79***	0.21***		3 602.0
	C	0.78 ***		0.22 ***	3 603.3
07.08苗区 07.08/Plot	A	0.55***			942.3
	B	0.50***	0.38***		923.5
	C	0.46***		0.55 ***	911.2
07.08/样站 07.08/Site	A	0.57***			957.4
	B	0.57***	0.34***		941.4
	C	0.57***		0.40***	937.7
06.05/苗区 06.05/Plot	A	0.30*			867.5
	B	0.28*	0.23**		861.0
	C	0.29*		0.25**	861.6
06.05/样站 06.05/Site	A	0.17			903.6
	B	0.16	0.10		904.1
	C	0.16		0.11	904.8
06.08/苗区 06.08/Plot	A	0.40**			488.4
	B	0.40**	0.14		489.0
	C	0.41**		0.21	487.7
06.08/样站 06.08/Site	A	0.45***			500.1
	B	0.44 ***	-0.04		502.0
	C	0.46 ***		0.05	502.0
06.11/苗区 06.11/Plot	A	0.40**			489.0
	B	0.39**	-0.07		490.6
	C	0.39**		-0.09	490.5
06.11样站 06.11/Site	A	0.19*			536.9
	B	0.19*	0.03		538.8
	C	0.19*		-0.02	538.9

时间/尺度 Time/Scale	模型 Model	回归系数+显著水平 Coefficient+significance
时间/尺度 Time/Scale	模型 Model	Ln (同种密度) Ln (conspecies density)	净种间亲缘关系指数 NRI	净最近种间亲缘关系指数 NTI	赤沲信息量准则 AIC
07.05/苗区 07.05/Plot	A	0.76 ***			4 083.2
	B	0.74 ***	0.32 ***		4 038.1
	C	0.74 ***		0.33 ***	4 043.9
07.05/样站 07.05/Site	A	0.79 ***			3 613.7
	B	0.79***	0.21***		3 602.0
	C	0.78 ***		0.22 ***	3 603.3
07.08苗区 07.08/Plot	A	0.55***			942.3
	B	0.50***	0.38***		923.5
	C	0.46***		0.55 ***	911.2
07.08/样站 07.08/Site	A	0.57***			957.4
	B	0.57***	0.34***		941.4
	C	0.57***		0.40***	937.7
06.05/苗区 06.05/Plot	A	0.30*			867.5
	B	0.28*	0.23**		861.0
	C	0.29*		0.25**	861.6
06.05/样站 06.05/Site	A	0.17			903.6
	B	0.16	0.10		904.1
	C	0.16		0.11	904.8
06.08/苗区 06.08/Plot	A	0.40**			488.4
	B	0.40**	0.14		489.0
	C	0.41**		0.21	487.7
06.08/样站 06.08/Site	A	0.45***			500.1
	B	0.44 ***	-0.04		502.0
	C	0.46 ***		0.05	502.0
06.11/苗区 06.11/Plot	A	0.40**			489.0
	B	0.39**	-0.07		490.6
	C	0.39**		-0.09	490.5
06.11样站 06.11/Site	A	0.19*			536.9
	B	0.19*	0.03		538.8
	C	0.19*		-0.02	538.9