呼中林区与呼中自然保护区森林粗木质残体储量的比较

doi:10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2009.06.007

植物生态学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 1075-1083.DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2009.06.007

呼中林区与呼中自然保护区森林粗木质残体储量的比较

刘志华¹^,², 常禹¹^,^*(), 胡远满¹, 李月辉¹, 王金海⁴, 荆国志³, 张红新³, 张长蒙³

1 中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所,沈阳 110016
2 中国科学院研究生院,北京 100049
3 大兴安岭呼中林业局,黑龙江呼中 165036
4 黑龙江呼中国家级自然保护区, 黑龙江呼中 165036

收稿日期:2008-10-08 接受日期:2009-04-23 出版日期:2009-10-08 发布日期:2021-04-29
通讯作者: 常禹
作者简介:*(changyu@iae.ac.cn)
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(30670363);中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目(KZCXZ-YW-444);国家林业公益性行业科研资助专项(200804001)

COMPARISON OF STORAGE OF COARSE WOODY DEBRIS BETWEEN HUZHONG FOREST BUREAU AND HUZHONG NATURAL RESERVE IN DA HINGGAN MOUNTAINS, CHINA

LIU Zhi-Hua¹^,², CHANG Yu¹^,^*(), HU Yuan-Man¹, LI Yue-Hui¹, WANG Jin-Hai⁴, JING Guo-Zhi³, ZHANG Hong-Xin³, ZHANG Chang-Meng³

1 Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Science, Shenyang 110016, China
2 Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049, China
3 Huzhong Forest Administrative Bureau, the Da Hinggan Mountains, Huzhong, Heilongjiang 165036, China
4 Huzhong Natural Reserve, Huzhong, Heilongjiang 165036, China

Received:2008-10-08 Accepted:2009-04-23 Online:2009-10-08 Published:2021-04-29
Contact: CHANG Yu

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用样线法研究了人为干扰对大兴安岭呼中林区粗木质残体(Coarse woody debris, CWD)储量的影响。结果表明, 未受人为干扰的呼中自然保护区中CWD变化范围集中在5.92~43.53 m³·hm^-2, 受到人为干扰的呼中林区中CWD变化范围集中在12.70~47.59 m³·hm^-2之间。人为干扰对混交林和针叶林的CWD储量影响显著, 而对阔叶林CWD储量影响不显著。人为干扰增加了混交林CWD储量, 减少了针叶林CWD储量, 同时减少了枯立木的数量, 增加了高度腐烂的CWD的比例。对兴安落叶松各林型的分析表明, 人为干扰条件下CWD储量(8.20~25.60 m³·hm^-2)是未受干扰条件下CWD储量(18.70~36.99 m³·hm^-2)的1/4~1/3。为促使采伐后的森林能维持原始林粗木质残体的结构特征, 建议保留采伐剩余物以维持一定储量的CWD。

关键词: 样线法, 粗木质残体, 人为干扰, 大兴安岭

Abstract:

Aims Coarse woody debris (CWD) plays an important role in maintaining biodiversity, providing critical habitat for organisms and cycling of carbon and nitrogen in forest systems. Our objective was to understand the effects of anthropogenic disturbance on CWD in Da Hinggan Mountains as the key to forest health and sustainable forest management.
Methods We compared CWD storage using a line-intercept method in Huzhong Forest Bureau, which represented forest affected by anthropogenic disturbance, with Huzhong Natural Reserve, which represented primary forest unaffected by anthropogenic disturbance, of Da Hinggan Mountains.
Important findings Storage of CWD varied between 5.92-43.53 m³·hm^-2 in Huzhong Natural Reserve and 12.70-47.59 m³·hm^-2 in Huzhong Forest Bureau. Anthropogenic disturbance had greater effects on mixed and coniferous forest than broadleaf forest. More CWD occurred in mixed forest and less CWD in coniferous forest, and the proportion of the advanced decay class CWD increased and snags decreased with anthropogenic disturbance. The storage of CWD in managed forest (8.20-25.60 m³·hm^-2) is less than that in virgin forest (18.70-36.99 m³·hm^-2). Residue from harvesting should be maintained to retain the natural forest characteristics of CWD.

Key words: line-intersect method, coarse woody debris (CWD), anthropogenic disturbance, Da Hinggan Mountains

刘志华, 常禹, 胡远满, 李月辉, 王金海, 荆国志, 张红新, 张长蒙. 呼中林区与呼中自然保护区森林粗木质残体储量的比较. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(6): 1075-1083. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2009.06.007

LIU Zhi-Hua, CHANG Yu, HU Yuan-Man, LI Yue-Hui, WANG Jin-Hai, JING Guo-Zhi, ZHANG Hong-Xin, ZHANG Chang-Meng. COMPARISON OF STORAGE OF COARSE WOODY DEBRIS BETWEEN HUZHONG FOREST BUREAU AND HUZHONG NATURAL RESERVE IN DA HINGGAN MOUNTAINS, CHINA. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2009, 33(6): 1075-1083. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2009.06.007

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2009.06.007

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2009/V33/I6/1075

图/表 6

参考文献 40

[1]	Bailey GF (1970). A simplified method of sampling logging residue. Forestry Chronicle, 46,288-294.
[2]	Brown JK (1974). Handbook for Inventorying Downed Woody Material. GTR-INT-16, USDA Forest Service, Ogden, UT.
[3]	Bull EL (2002). The Value of Coarse Woody Debris to Vertebrates in the Pacific Northwest. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report,PSWGTR-181, 171-178.
[4]	Carey AB (1983). Cavities in trees in hardwood forest. In: Davis JW, Goodwin GA eds. Snag Habitat Management: Symposium Proceeding. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report, RM-99,167-184.
[5]	Chen H (陈华), Harmon ME (1992). Dynamic study of coarse woody debris in temperate forest ecosystems. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 3,99-104. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	Currie WS, Jadelhoffer KN (2002). The imprint of land use history: patterns of carbon and nitrogen in downed woody debris at the Harvard forest. Ecosystems, 5,446-460.
[7]	Dai LM (代力民), Xu ZB (徐振邦), Chen H (陈华) (2000). Storage dynamics of fallen trees in the broad-leaved and Korean pine mixed forest. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 20,412-416. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	Deng HB (邓红兵), Xiao BY (肖宝英), Dai LM (代力民), Wang QL (王庆礼), Wang SX (王绍先) (2002). Advances in ecological studies on in-stream coarse woody debris. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 22,87-92. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	de Vries PG (1973). A General Theory on Line-intersect Sampling with Application to Logging Residue Inventory. Mededdlingen Landbouw Hogeschool No. 73-11, The Netherlands, Wageningen, 23.
[10]	Gu HY (谷会岩), Dai LM (代力民), Wang SZ (王顺忠), Yu DP (于大炮), Zhou L (周莉) (2006). Effect of human disturbance on coarse woody debris in Korean pine and broad-leaved mixed forest on ChangBai Mountain. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 42(10),1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	Guby NAB, Dobbertin M (1996). Biodiversity implications of changes in the quantity of dead organic matter in managed forests. Environmental Reviews, 4,238-265.
[12]	Harmon ME, Franklin JF, Swanson FJ, Solkins PJ, Gregory SV, Lattin JP, Andersen NH, Cline SP, Aumen NG, Sedell JR, Lienkaemper GW, Gromack Jr K, Cummins KW (1986). Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Advances in Ecological Research, 15,133-302.
[13]	Hou P (侯平), Pan CD (潘存德) (2001). Coarse woody debris and its function in forest ecosystem. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 12,309-314. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	Hu YM (胡远满), Xu CG (徐崇刚), Chang Y (常禹), Li XZ (李秀珍), Bu RC (布仁仓), He HS (贺红士), Leng WF (冷文芳) (2004). Application of spatially explicit landscape model (LANDIS): a case researches in Huzhong area, Mountain, Daxing’an Ling. Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 24,1846-1856. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	Waddell KL (2002). Sampling coarse woody debris for multiple attributes in extensive resource inventories. Ecological Indicators, 1,139-153.
[16]	Larson FR (1992). Downed Woody Material in Southeast Alaska Forest Stands. PNW-RP-452, USDA Forest Service, Portland, OR. DOI URL PMID
[17]	Li LH (李凌浩), Dao GD (党高弟), Wang TJ (汪铁军), Zhao LG (赵雷刚)(1998). Coarse woody debris in an Abies Fargesii forest in the QinLing Mountains. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica(植物生态学报), 22,434-440. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	Li LH (李凌浩), Xing XR (邢雪荣), Hang DM (黄大明), Liu CD (刘初钿), He JY (何建源) (1996). Storage and dynamics of coarse woody debris in Castanopsis eyrei forest of Wuyi Mountains with some consideration for its ecological effects. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 20,132-143. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	Liu HY (刘惠英), Zhang SY (张思玉), Ji X (吉霞) (2004). The soil and water conservation function of coarse woody debris. World Forstry Research (世界林业研究), 17(3),25-28. (in Chinese)
[20]	Marcot BG (2002). italic>An Ecological Functional Basis for Managing Wood Decay Elements for Wildlife. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep.,PSW-GTR-181, 895-910.
[21]	Masamichi T, Yoshimi S, Reiko O, Shiozaki M (2000). Establishment of tree seedlings and water soluble nutrients in coarse woody debris in an old growth Picea-Abies forest in Hokkaido, Northern Japan. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 30,1148-1155.
[22]	Pedlar JH, Pearce JL, Venier LA, McKenney DW (2002). Coarse woody debris in relation to disturbance and forest type in boreal Canada. Forest Ecology and Management, 158,189-194.
[23]	Raija L, Prescott CE (1999). The contribution of coarse woody debris to carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycles in three Rocky mountain coniferous forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 29,1592-1603.
[24]	Ripple WJ, Larsen EJ (2001). The role of postfire coarse woody debris in Aspen regeneration. Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 16(2),61-64.
[25]	Rubino DL, McCarthy BC (2003). Evaluation of coarse woody debris and forest vegetation across topographic gradients in a southern Ohio forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 183,221-238.
[26]	Russell RE, Saab VA, Dudley JG, Rotella JJ (2006). Snag longevity in relation to wildfire and postfire salvage logging. Forest Ecology and Management, 232,179-187.
[27]	Schlegel BC, Donoso PJ (2008). Effects of forest type and stand structure on Coarse Woody Debris in old-growth rainforests in the Valdivian Andes, south-central Chile. Forest Ecology and Management, 225,1906-1914.
[28]	Siitonen J, Martikainen P, Rauh J (2000). Coarse woody debris and stand characteristics in mature managed and old-growth boreal mesic forests in southern Finland. Forest Ecology and Management, 128,211-225.
[29]	Stevens V (1997). The Ecological Role of Coarse Woody Debris, an Overview of the Ecological Importance of CWD in BC Forests. Working paper ministry of forest research program. British Columbia. 30.
[30]	Tang XL (唐旭利), Zhou GY (周国逸), Zhou X (周霞), Wen DZ (温达志), Zhang QM (张倩媚), Yi GC (尹光彩)(2003). Coarse woody debris in monsoon evergreen broad-leaved forests of Dinghushan nature reserve. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica(植物生态学报), 27,484-489. ( in Chinese with English abstract).
[31]	Tang XL (唐旭利), Zhou GY (周国逸) (2005). Coarse woody debris biomass and its potential contribution to the carbon cycle in successional subtropical forests of southern China. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 29,559-568. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	van Wagner CE (1968). The line-intersect method for forest fuel sampling. Forest Science, 14,20-26.
[33]	Waddell KL (2002). Sampling coarse woody debris for multiple affzibutes in extensive resource inventories. Ecological Indicators, 1,139-153.
[34]	Warren WG, Olsen PF (1964). A line-intersect technique for assessing logging waste. Forest Science, 10,267-276.
[35]	Webster CR, Jenkins MA (2005). Coarse woody debris dynamics in the Southern Appalachians as affected by topographic position and anthropogenic disturbance history. Forest Ecology and Management, 217,319-330.
[36]	Woodall CW, Williams MS (2005). Sampling Protocol, Estimation, and Analysis Procedures for Down Woody Materials Indicator of the FIA Program. USDA Forest Service General Technical Repart. NC-256.St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station. 47.
[37]	Xu HC (徐化成) (1998). Da Xinganling Mountains Forests in China (中国大兴安岭森林). Science Press,Beijing. (in Chinese)
[38]	Yan ER (闫恩荣), Wang XH (王希华), Huang JJ (黄建军) (2005). Concept and classification of coarse woody debris in forest ecosystems. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 25,158-167. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[39]	Zhao YT (赵玉涛), Yu XX (余新晓), Cheng GW (程根伟), Luo J (罗辑) (2002). The function of CWD. Journal of Mountain Science (山地学报), 20(1),12-18. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[40]	Sippola AL, Siitonen J, Kallio R (1998). Amount and quality of coarse woody debris in natural and managed coniferous forests near the timberline in Finnish Lapland. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 13,204-214.

特征 Character	分解等级 Decay class
特征 Character	轻度分解 Early decay	中度分解 Intermediate decay		高度分解 Advanced decay
	I	II	III	IV	V
枝叶 Branches, twigs and leaves	枝叶全存在 Present	<5 cm的小枝脱落 Twigs less than 5 cm stubs	<10 cm的大枝脱落 Twigs less than 10 cm stubs	枝节脱落 Branch stubs	不存在 Absence
树皮 Bark	完整, 坚固Intact, tight	存在 Present	大部分存在 Majority present	大部分脱落 Majority absent	无 Absent
木质结构完整性 Wood texture integrity	坚固, 原色 Solid, original color	坚固, 原色 Solid, original color	半坚实, 原色至褪色 Semi-solid Original color to faded	部分变软, 原色至褪色 Partly soft, original color to faded	变软破碎, 褪色 Fragmented, faded
植物生长状况 Vegetation condition	无 No present	无 No present	少量苔藓 Mosses cover less than 35%	少量灌木, 幼苗, 苔藓覆盖一半 Few shrubs, seedlings, mosses cover about 50%	灌木, 幼苗较多; 苔藓覆盖面积超过表面积的50% More shrubs, seedlings, Mosses cover more than 60% of surface area

特征 Character	分解等级 Decay class
特征 Character	轻度分解 Early decay	中度分解 Intermediate decay		高度分解 Advanced decay
	I	II	III	IV	V
枝叶 Branches, twigs and leaves	枝叶全存在 Present	<5 cm的小枝脱落 Twigs less than 5 cm stubs	<10 cm的大枝脱落 Twigs less than 10 cm stubs	枝节脱落 Branch stubs	不存在 Absence
树皮 Bark	完整, 坚固Intact, tight	存在 Present	大部分存在 Majority present	大部分脱落 Majority absent	无 Absent
木质结构完整性 Wood texture integrity	坚固, 原色 Solid, original color	坚固, 原色 Solid, original color	半坚实, 原色至褪色 Semi-solid Original color to faded	部分变软, 原色至褪色 Partly soft, original color to faded	变软破碎, 褪色 Fragmented, faded
植物生长状况 Vegetation condition	无 No present	无 No present	少量苔藓 Mosses cover less than 35%	少量灌木, 幼苗, 苔藓覆盖一半 Few shrubs, seedlings, mosses cover about 50%	灌木, 幼苗较多; 苔藓覆盖面积超过表面积的50% More shrubs, seedlings, Mosses cover more than 60% of surface area

	保护区 Nature reserve
	倒木 Down log 平均值(标准偏差) Mean (SD)	枯立木 Snag 平均值(标准偏差) Mean (SD)	总 Total 平均值(标准偏差) Mean (SD)	倒木 Down log 平均值(标准偏差) Mean (SD)	枯立木 Snag 平均值(标准偏差) Mean (SD)	总 Total 平均值(标准偏差) Mean (SD)
混交林 Mixed forest	2.33 (1.33)	3.58 (2.58)	5.92 (3.92)	27.72 (32.65)	2.05 (3.20)	29.77 (35.85)
阔叶林 Broadleaf forest	26.20 (3.76)	17.33 (18.58)	43.53 (22.35)	42.23 (41.61)	5.36 (10.72)	47.59 (52.33)
针叶林 Coniferous forest	29.56 (16.46)	11.03 (10.46)	40.58 (26.92)	8.99 (9.51)	3.72 (8.17)	12.70 (17.67)

	保护区 Nature reserve
	倒木 Down log 平均值(标准偏差) Mean (SD)	枯立木 Snag 平均值(标准偏差) Mean (SD)	总 Total 平均值(标准偏差) Mean (SD)	倒木 Down log 平均值(标准偏差) Mean (SD)	枯立木 Snag 平均值(标准偏差) Mean (SD)	总 Total 平均值(标准偏差) Mean (SD)
混交林 Mixed forest	2.33 (1.33)	3.58 (2.58)	5.92 (3.92)	27.72 (32.65)	2.05 (3.20)	29.77 (35.85)
阔叶林 Broadleaf forest	26.20 (3.76)	17.33 (18.58)	43.53 (22.35)	42.23 (41.61)	5.36 (10.72)	47.59 (52.33)
针叶林 Coniferous forest	29.56 (16.46)	11.03 (10.46)	40.58 (26.92)	8.99 (9.51)	3.72 (8.17)	12.70 (17.67)

呼中林区与呼中自然保护区森林粗木质残体储量的比较

COMPARISON OF STORAGE OF COARSE WOODY DEBRIS BETWEEN HUZHONG FOREST BUREAU AND HUZHONG NATURAL RESERVE IN DA HINGGAN MOUNTAINS, CHINA

全文

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 40

相关文章 14

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	牛一迪, 蔡体久. 大兴安岭北部次生林演替过程中物种多样性的变化及其影响因子[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(3): 349-363.
[2]	李瑞, 胡朝臣, 许士麒, 吴迪, 董玉平, 孙新超, 毛瑢, 王宪伟, 刘学炎. 大兴安岭泥炭地植物叶片碳氮磷含量及其化学计量学特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(12): 1154-1167.
[3]	常永兴, 陈振举, 张先亮, 白学平, 赵学鹏, 李俊霞, 陆旭. 气候变暖下大兴安岭落叶松径向生长对温度的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(3): 279-289.
[4]	李明泽, 王斌, 范文义, 赵丹丹. 东北林区净初级生产力及大兴安岭地区林火干扰影响的模拟研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(4): 322-332.
[5]	张敏,潘艳霞,杨洪晓. 山东半岛潮上带沙草地的物种多度格局及其对人为干扰的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(6): 542-550.
[6]	胡海清, 魏书精, 孙龙. 1965-2010年大兴安岭森林火灾碳排放的估算研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(7): 629-644.
[7]	商志远, 王建, 崔明星, 陈振举. 樟子松树轮δ ¹³C的年内变化特征及其对气候要素的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(12): 1256-1267.
[8]	王晓春, 宋来萍, 张远东. 大兴安岭北部樟子松树木生长与气候因子的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(3): 294-302.
[9]	孙菊, 李秀珍, 王宪伟, 吕久俊, 李宗梅, 胡远满. 大兴安岭冻土湿地植物群落结构的环境梯度分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(10): 1165-1173.
[10]	袁春明, 刘文耀, 李小双, 杨国平. 哀牢山湿性常绿阔叶林木质藤本植物地上部分生物量及其对人为干扰的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(5): 852-859.
[11]	邱扬, 李湛东, 张玉钧, 徐化成, 于汝元, 张希来. 大兴安岭北部地区原始林白桦种群的世代结构[J]. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(5): 753-762.
[12]	陈国科, 彭华. 不同人为干扰条件下毒药树种群数量特征的比较[J]. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(3): 426-431.
[13]	莫江明, 彭少麟, Sandra BROWN, 方运霆, 孔国辉. 鼎湖山马尾松林植物养分积累动态及其对人为干扰的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2004, 28(6): 810-822.
[14]	张齐兵. 林区火灾后植物群落与冻土环境的多元分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 1993, 17(1): 43-55.