植物生态学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 753-762.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0097
邱扬1(), 李湛东2, 张玉钧2, 徐化成2, 于汝元2, 张希来3
收稿日期:
2005-10-09
接受日期:
2005-02-15
出版日期:
2006-10-09
发布日期:
2006-09-30
作者简介:
第一联系人:E-mail: qiuyang69@263.net
基金资助:
QIU Yang1(), LI Zhan-Dong2, ZHANG Yu-Jun2, XU Hua-Cheng2, YU Ru-Yuan2, ZHANG Xi-Lai3
Received:
2005-10-09
Accepted:
2005-02-15
Online:
2006-10-09
Published:
2006-09-30
About author:
First author contact:E-mail: qiuyang69@263.net
摘要:
在景观火干扰历史重建的基础上,该文研究了大兴安岭北部地区原始林白桦(Betula platyphylla)种群的世代结构及其与火干扰、立地条件之间的关系。结果表明:白桦种群基于世代数的世代结构类型丰富,从一代型到五代型都有,空间分布呈斑块镶嵌状。以一代型与二代型为主要类型,空间分布集中,其它类型的世代结构空间异质性较高。世代数受火干扰频率、火干扰强度及两者的综合影响,相对来说以火干扰频率的影响更为显著。低频或高强类的火干扰易造成种群的世代数减少;高频或低强类的火干扰易造成世代数增多。世代数还随林型组类型而变化,以溪旁林组>赤杨(Alnus mandshurica)林组>杜香(Ledum palustre)林组。
白桦种群基于火干扰的世代结构类型也很丰富,存在3大类、5亚类和11小类,空间分布呈斑块镶嵌状。其中以火后优势火前劣势型和更新优势火前劣势型为主要类型,空间分布较聚集,其它类型的空间异质性较高。这种世代结构也受火干扰频率、火干扰强度及两者的综合影响。随着火频增高或者火强减弱,白桦种群的自我恢复性和抗火性增强,火后恢复性减弱。中高强火烧地上,世代结构为火后优势火前劣势型,低强火烧地上为更新优势火前劣势型。世代结构还随立地条件而变化。不同林型组之间,白桦种群的优势世代(火后代和更新代)存在显著的数量差异,但是世代结构保持为火后优势火前劣势型;偏东坡为火后优势火前劣势型,偏西坡及北坡为更新优势火后劣势型;224林班为火后优势型,218林班却为更新优势型。
邱扬, 李湛东, 张玉钧, 徐化成, 于汝元, 张希来. 大兴安岭北部地区原始林白桦种群的世代结构. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(5): 753-762. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0097
QIU Yang, LI Zhan-Dong, ZHANG Yu-Jun, XU Hua-Cheng, YU Ru-Yuan, ZHANG Xi-Lai. STUDY ON COHORT STRUCTURE OF BETULA PLATYPHYLLA POPULATION IN VIRGIN FOREST, NORTHERN REGION OF DAXING'ANLING MOUNTAINS, CHINA. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2006, 30(5): 753-762. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0097
世代结构 Cohort Structure | 零代型 Group of 0-cohort | 一代型 Group of 1-cohort | 二代型 Group of 2-cohort | 三代型 Group of 3-cohort | 四代型 Group of 4-cohort | 五代型 Group of 5-cohort | 总计 Sum | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
面积 Area (hm2) | 27.64 | 149.15 | 242.39 | 70.49 | 40.30 | 12.65 | 542.61 | ||||||||||||
百分率 Percent (%) | 5.1 | 27.5 | 44.7 | 13.0 | 7.4 | 2.3 | 100.0 |
表1 白桦种群世代结构的面积分布
Table 1 Area distribution of the cohort structure of Betula platyphylla population
世代结构 Cohort Structure | 零代型 Group of 0-cohort | 一代型 Group of 1-cohort | 二代型 Group of 2-cohort | 三代型 Group of 3-cohort | 四代型 Group of 4-cohort | 五代型 Group of 5-cohort | 总计 Sum | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
面积 Area (hm2) | 27.64 | 149.15 | 242.39 | 70.49 | 40.30 | 12.65 | 542.61 | ||||||||||||
百分率 Percent (%) | 5.1 | 27.5 | 44.7 | 13.0 | 7.4 | 2.3 | 100.0 |
火干扰类型 Type of fire disturbance | 世代结构 Cohort structure | 世代数 Number of cohort |
---|---|---|
低频低强类 Low frequency & low severity | 一代型 1-cohort | 1.50ABC |
低频中强类 Low frequency & middle severity | 一代型 1-cohort | 0.93A |
低频高强类 Low frequency & high severity | 一代型 1-cohort | 1.25A |
中频低强类 Middle frequency & low severity | 二代型 2-cohort | 2.09BC |
中频中强类 Middle frequency & middle severity | 二代型 2-cohort | 1.80B |
中频高强类 Middle frequency & high severity | 二代型 2-cohort | 1.91BD |
高频低强类 High frequency & low severity | 三代型 3-cohort | 2.75CDE |
高频中强类 High frequency & middle severity | 三代型 3-cohort | 2.88BE |
表2 不同火干扰类型的白桦种群的世代结构类型与世代数
Table 2 Sub-group of cohort structure and number of cohort of Betula platyphylla population among different types of fire disturbance
火干扰类型 Type of fire disturbance | 世代结构 Cohort structure | 世代数 Number of cohort |
---|---|---|
低频低强类 Low frequency & low severity | 一代型 1-cohort | 1.50ABC |
低频中强类 Low frequency & middle severity | 一代型 1-cohort | 0.93A |
低频高强类 Low frequency & high severity | 一代型 1-cohort | 1.25A |
中频低强类 Middle frequency & low severity | 二代型 2-cohort | 2.09BC |
中频中强类 Middle frequency & middle severity | 二代型 2-cohort | 1.80B |
中频高强类 Middle frequency & high severity | 二代型 2-cohort | 1.91BD |
高频低强类 High frequency & low severity | 三代型 3-cohort | 2.75CDE |
高频中强类 High frequency & middle severity | 三代型 3-cohort | 2.88BE |
林型组 Forest type group | 溪旁林组 Group near streams | 赤杨林组 Group of Alnus mandshurica | 杜香林组 Group of Ledum palustre | 平均 Mean |
---|---|---|---|---|
世代数 Number of cohort | 2.5 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 2.0 |
表3 不同林型组之间白桦种群的世代数
Table 3 Number of cohort of Betula platyphyllai population among forest type groups
林型组 Forest type group | 溪旁林组 Group near streams | 赤杨林组 Group of Alnus mandshurica | 杜香林组 Group of Ledum palustre | 平均 Mean |
---|---|---|---|---|
世代数 Number of cohort | 2.5 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 2.0 |
火频类型 Type of fire frequency | 世代结构 Cohort structure | 更新代 Cohort of regeneration | 火后代 Cohort of post-fire | 火前代 Cohort of pre-cohort |
---|---|---|---|---|
低频类 Low frequency | 火后优势火前劣势型 Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 13.78A | 86.08C | 0.14E |
中频类 Middle frequency | 火后优势火前劣势型 Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 36.35B | 60.09D | 2.25E |
高频类 High frequency | 火后优势火前劣势型 Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 38.64B | 51.67D | 10.21F |
表4 不同火频类型的白桦种群的世代结构类型与各世代的相对值(%)
Table 4 Sub-group of cohort structure and relative value (%) of cohort of Betula platyphylla population among different types of fire disturbance frequency
火频类型 Type of fire frequency | 世代结构 Cohort structure | 更新代 Cohort of regeneration | 火后代 Cohort of post-fire | 火前代 Cohort of pre-cohort |
---|---|---|---|---|
低频类 Low frequency | 火后优势火前劣势型 Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 13.78A | 86.08C | 0.14E |
中频类 Middle frequency | 火后优势火前劣势型 Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 36.35B | 60.09D | 2.25E |
高频类 High frequency | 火后优势火前劣势型 Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 38.64B | 51.67D | 10.21F |
火烧强度 Type of fire severity | 世代结构 Cohort structure | 更新代 Cohort of regeneration | 火后代 Cohort of post-fire | 火前代 Cohort of pre-cohort |
---|---|---|---|---|
低强类 Low severity | 火后优势火前劣势型 Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 41.52A | 51.25C | 5.48 |
中强类 Middle severity | 火后优势火前劣势型 Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 27.18AB | 69.72CD | 3.37 |
高强类 High severity | 火后优势火前劣势型 Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 18.99B | 81.01D | 0.00 |
表5 不同火强类型的白桦种群的世代结构类型与各世代的相对值(%)
Table 5 Sub-group of cohort structure and relative value (%) of cohort of Betula platyphylla population among different types of fire disturbance severity
火烧强度 Type of fire severity | 世代结构 Cohort structure | 更新代 Cohort of regeneration | 火后代 Cohort of post-fire | 火前代 Cohort of pre-cohort |
---|---|---|---|---|
低强类 Low severity | 火后优势火前劣势型 Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 41.52A | 51.25C | 5.48 |
中强类 Middle severity | 火后优势火前劣势型 Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 27.18AB | 69.72CD | 3.37 |
高强类 High severity | 火后优势火前劣势型 Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 18.99B | 81.01D | 0.00 |
火干扰类型 Type of fire disturbance | 世代结构 Cohort structure | 更新代 Cohort of regeneration | 火后代 Cohort of post-fire | 火前代 Cohort of pre-cohort |
---|---|---|---|---|
低频低强类 Low frequency & low severity | 更新优势火前劣势 Sub-groups of regeneration cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 57.00* | 39.30* | 3.60* |
低频中强类 Low frequency & middle severity | 火后优势火前劣势 Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 12.18A | 87.82A | 0.00A |
低频高强类 Low frequency & high severity | 火后优势火前劣势 Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 11.77A | 88.23A | 0.00A |
中频低强类 Middle frequency & low severity | 火后优势火前劣势 Sub-groups of pre-fire cohort dominance & post-fire cohort inferiority | 36.33BC | 57.57BC | 3.15AB |
中频中强类 Middle frequency & middle severity | 火后优势火前劣势 Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 43.84BC | 53.79BC | 2.59AB |
中频高强类 Middle frequency & high severity | 火后优势火前劣势 Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 26.86AB | 73.14AB | 0.00A |
高频低强类 High frequency & low severity | 更新优势火前劣势 Sub-groups of regeneration cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 49.75C | 40.66C | 9.93B |
高频中强类 High frequency & middle severity | 火后优势火前劣势Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 19.60AB | 70.56ABC | 10.70A |
表6 不同火干扰类型的白桦种群的世代结构类型与各世代相对值(%)
Table 6 Sub-group of cohort structure and relative value (%) of cohort of Betula platyphylla population among different types of fire disturbance
火干扰类型 Type of fire disturbance | 世代结构 Cohort structure | 更新代 Cohort of regeneration | 火后代 Cohort of post-fire | 火前代 Cohort of pre-cohort |
---|---|---|---|---|
低频低强类 Low frequency & low severity | 更新优势火前劣势 Sub-groups of regeneration cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 57.00* | 39.30* | 3.60* |
低频中强类 Low frequency & middle severity | 火后优势火前劣势 Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 12.18A | 87.82A | 0.00A |
低频高强类 Low frequency & high severity | 火后优势火前劣势 Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 11.77A | 88.23A | 0.00A |
中频低强类 Middle frequency & low severity | 火后优势火前劣势 Sub-groups of pre-fire cohort dominance & post-fire cohort inferiority | 36.33BC | 57.57BC | 3.15AB |
中频中强类 Middle frequency & middle severity | 火后优势火前劣势 Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 43.84BC | 53.79BC | 2.59AB |
中频高强类 Middle frequency & high severity | 火后优势火前劣势 Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 26.86AB | 73.14AB | 0.00A |
高频低强类 High frequency & low severity | 更新优势火前劣势 Sub-groups of regeneration cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 49.75C | 40.66C | 9.93B |
高频中强类 High frequency & middle severity | 火后优势火前劣势Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 19.60AB | 70.56ABC | 10.70A |
林型组 Groups of forest type | 世代结构 Cohort structure | 更新代 Cohort of regeneration | 火后代 Cohort of post-fire | 火前代 Cohort of pre-cohort |
---|---|---|---|---|
溪旁林组 Group near streams | 火后优势火前劣势 Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 42.23AB | 49.45CD | 8.32 |
赤杨林组 Group of Alnus mandshurica | 火后优势火前劣势 Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 48.63A | 51.22C | 0.40 |
杜香林组 Group of Ledum palustre | 火后优势火前劣势Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 23.03B | 71.91D | 4.13 |
表7 不同林型组的白桦种群的世代结构与各世代的相对值(%)
Table 7 Sub-group of cohort structure and relative value (%) of cohort of Betula platyphylla population among different groups of forest type
林型组 Groups of forest type | 世代结构 Cohort structure | 更新代 Cohort of regeneration | 火后代 Cohort of post-fire | 火前代 Cohort of pre-cohort |
---|---|---|---|---|
溪旁林组 Group near streams | 火后优势火前劣势 Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 42.23AB | 49.45CD | 8.32 |
赤杨林组 Group of Alnus mandshurica | 火后优势火前劣势 Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 48.63A | 51.22C | 0.40 |
杜香林组 Group of Ledum palustre | 火后优势火前劣势Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 23.03B | 71.91D | 4.13 |
坡向 Aspect | 世代结构 Cohort structure | 更新代 Cohort of regeneration | 火后代 Cohort of post-fire | 火前代 Cohort of pre-cohort |
---|---|---|---|---|
东南坡 Southeastern slope | 火后优势火前劣势 Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 34.28ABC | 65.72DEF | 0.00 |
东坡 Eastern slope | 火后优势火前劣势 Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 15.82B | 81.43D | 0.53 |
东北坡 Northeastern slope | 火后优势火前劣势 Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 15.95BC | 80.53D | 3.68 |
北坡 Northern slope | 更新优势火前劣势型 Sub-groups of regeneration cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 49.40A | 44.44EG | 6.16 |
西坡 Western slope | 更新优势火前劣势型 Sub-groups of regeneration cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 77.80AB | 22.20DG | 0.00 |
西北坡 Northwestern slope | 更新优势火前劣势型 Sub-groups of regeneration cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 55.63A | 37.95FG | 6.97 |
表8 不同坡向的白桦种群的世代结构与各世代的相对值(%)
Table 8 Sub-group of cohort structure and relative value (%) of cohort of Betula platyphylla population between different groups of forest type
坡向 Aspect | 世代结构 Cohort structure | 更新代 Cohort of regeneration | 火后代 Cohort of post-fire | 火前代 Cohort of pre-cohort |
---|---|---|---|---|
东南坡 Southeastern slope | 火后优势火前劣势 Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 34.28ABC | 65.72DEF | 0.00 |
东坡 Eastern slope | 火后优势火前劣势 Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 15.82B | 81.43D | 0.53 |
东北坡 Northeastern slope | 火后优势火前劣势 Sub-groups of post-fire cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 15.95BC | 80.53D | 3.68 |
北坡 Northern slope | 更新优势火前劣势型 Sub-groups of regeneration cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 49.40A | 44.44EG | 6.16 |
西坡 Western slope | 更新优势火前劣势型 Sub-groups of regeneration cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 77.80AB | 22.20DG | 0.00 |
西北坡 Northwestern slope | 更新优势火前劣势型 Sub-groups of regeneration cohort dominance & pre-fire cohort inferiority | 55.63A | 37.95FG | 6.97 |
[1] | Fan ZF (范兆飞), Xu HC (徐化成), Yu RY (于汝元) (1991). Study on the relation among the diameter, height distribution and age structure of Larix gemelini. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (北京林业大学学报), 12(Suppl.),75-80. (in Chinese) |
[2] | Fan ZF (范兆飞), Xu HC (徐化成), Yu RY (于汝元) (1992). A study on the species group age structure of Larix gmelinii population and its relation to disturbance in the north Daxinganling Mountains . Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 28,2-11. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[3] | Glin-Leven DC, Peet RK, Veblin TT (1992). Plant Succession: Theory and Prediction. Chapman & Hall, New York. |
[4] | Gu YC (顾云春) (1985). The succession of forest communities in the forest region of the Greater Xingan Mountains. Acta Phytoecologica et Geobotanica Sinica (植物生态学与地植物学丛刊), 9,64-70. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[5] | Meng XY (孟宪宇) (1989). Analyses for structures of age in natural Larix gmelinii stands . Journal of Beijing Forestry University (北京林业大学学报), 11(3),17-23. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[6] | Oliver CD, Larson BC (1990). Forest Stand Dynamics. McGraw-Hill, New York. |
[7] | Pickett STA, White PS (1985). The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. Academic Press, New York. |
[8] | Qiu Y (邱扬), Du JL (杜建林) (1997). Age structure survey of tree population in forest ecology studies. Journal of Shanxi University (Natural Science Edition) (山西大学学报(自然科学版)), 20,107-110. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[9] | Qiu Y (邱扬), Li ZD (李湛东), Xu HC (徐化成) (1997). Study on the relation between the stability of Larix gemelini population and the fire disturbance . Bulletin of Botanical Research (植物研究), 17,441-446. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[10] | Qiu Y (邱扬), Li ZD (李湛东), Zhang YJ (张玉钧), Xu HC (徐化成), Yu RY (于汝元) (2003). Study on the cohort structure of Larix gemelinii population in virgin forest in northern of Daxing'an Mountains . Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 39(3),15-22. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[11] | Qiu Y (邱扬), Li ZD (李湛东), Yu RY (于汝元) (1998). Study on the relation between the stability of Betula platyphylla population and the fire disturbance . Bulletin of Botanical Research (植物研究), 18,321-327. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[12] | Shan JP (单建平), Xu ZB (徐振邦), Tao DL (陶大立) (1990). Fire and the seed germination of Larix gmelinii. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 26,545-549. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] | Sun XY (孙晓玉), Lu ZH (陆兆华), Yu XJ (于兴军), Sang WG (桑卫国) (2005). Age structure dynamics of Eupatorium adenophorum populations and its implications for control . Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 29,373-379. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[14] | Xu HC (徐化成), Fan ZF (范兆飞), Yu RY (于汝元) (1993). Age structure dynamics of virgin Larix gmelinii forest . Chinese Journal of Applied Edology (应用生态学报), 4,229-233. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[15] | Xu HC (徐化成), Li ZD (李湛东), Qiu Y (邱扬) (1997). Fire disturbance history in virgin forest in northern region of Daxinganling Mountains. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 17,337-343. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[16] | Yang YH (杨允菲), Zheng HY (郑慧莹), Li JD (李建东) (2001). The effects of grazing on age structure in clonal populations of Agropyron michnoi. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 25,71-75. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[17] | Zhao HX (赵惠勋), Wang YH (王义弘), Li JQ (李俊清), He XL (何晓兰) (1987). The age structure, spatial pattern and management of natural forest of Larix gemelini, Tahe forestry bureau . Journal of Northeast Forestry University (东北林业大学学报), 15(Suppl.),60-64. (in Chinese) |
[18] | Zheng HL (郑焕能), Jia SQ (贾松清), Hu HQ (胡海清) (1986). Forest fire and forest rehabilitation in the Daxing'anling Mountains. Journal of Northeast Forestry University (东北林业大学学报), 14,1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 李文博 孙龙 娄虎 于澄 韩宇 胡同欣. 火干扰对兴安落叶松种子萌发的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(预发表): 0-0. |
[2] | 牛一迪, 蔡体久. 大兴安岭北部次生林演替过程中物种多样性的变化及其影响因子[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(3): 349-363. |
[3] | 沈健, 何宗明, 董强, 郜士垒, 林宇. 轻度火烧对滨海沙地人工林土壤呼吸速率和非生物因子的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(7): 1032-1042. |
[4] | 李瑞, 胡朝臣, 许士麒, 吴迪, 董玉平, 孙新超, 毛瑢, 王宪伟, 刘学炎. 大兴安岭泥炭地植物叶片碳氮磷含量及其化学计量学特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(12): 1154-1167. |
[5] | 常永兴, 陈振举, 张先亮, 白学平, 赵学鹏, 李俊霞, 陆旭. 气候变暖下大兴安岭落叶松径向生长对温度的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(3): 279-289. |
[6] | 李志民, 王传宽, 罗丹丹. 兴安落叶松叶水力与光合性状的变异性和相关性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(11): 1140-1148. |
[7] | 李明泽, 王斌, 范文义, 赵丹丹. 东北林区净初级生产力及大兴安岭地区林火干扰影响的模拟研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(4): 322-332. |
[8] | 苏嫄, 焦菊英, 王志杰. 陕北黄土丘陵沟壑区坡沟立地环境下幼苗的存活特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(7): 694-709. |
[9] | 杨健,孔健健,刘波. 林火干扰对北方针叶林林下植被的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(5): 474-480. |
[10] | 胡海清, 魏书精, 孙龙. 1965-2010年大兴安岭森林火灾碳排放的估算研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(7): 629-644. |
[11] | 商志远, 王建, 崔明星, 陈振举. 樟子松树轮δ 13C的年内变化特征及其对气候要素的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(12): 1256-1267. |
[12] | 王晓春, 宋来萍, 张远东. 大兴安岭北部樟子松树木生长与气候因子的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(3): 294-302. |
[13] | 唐罗忠, 刘志龙, 虞木奎, 方升佐, 赵丹, 王子寅. 两种立地条件下麻栎人工林地上部分养分的积累和分配[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(6): 661-670. |
[14] | 罗东辉, 夏婧, 袁婧薇, 张忠华, 祝介东, 倪健. 我国西南山地喀斯特植被的根系生物量初探[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(5): 611-618. |
[15] | 孙菊, 李秀珍, 王宪伟, 吕久俊, 李宗梅, 胡远满. 大兴安岭冻土湿地植物群落结构的环境梯度分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(10): 1165-1173. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19