Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2006, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 791-801.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0101
Previous Articles Next Articles
YANG Xiao-Dong(), ZOU Xiao-Ming
Received:
2005-05-17
Accepted:
2005-12-30
Online:
2006-05-17
Published:
2006-09-30
About author:
First author contact:E-mail: yangxd@xtbg.ac.cn
YANG Xiao-Dong, ZOU Xiao-Ming. SOIL FAUNA AND LEAF LITTER DECOMPOSITION IN TROPICAL RAIN FOREST IN XISHUANGBANNA, SW CHINA: EFFECTS OF MESH SIZE OF LITTERBAGS[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2006, 30(5): 791-801.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.17521/cjpe.2006.0101
样地 Plots | 位置 Sites | 海拔 Altitude (m) | 盖度 Cover (%) | 样地环境 Environment of plot | 有机质 Organic matter (%) | 全氮 Total N (%) | pH | C/N | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRF1 | 位于勐昆公路55 km,属勐仑自然保护区,是CERN在西双版纳热带雨林定位研究样地 The SRF1 is located in a distance of 15 km to Tropical Botanical Garden, where belong to Xishuangbanna Nature Reserves. It is also field site for CERN study | 750 | 90~95 | 林地面积较大,周围主要是常绿阔叶林,样地包括坡度较大的坡地和平缓的冲积地,人为干扰较小 Forest area is large. Evergreen broad-leaved forest is surrounding vegetation. Landform of plot include riparian and upland. Human disturbance in the plot is light | 2.713 | 0.140 | 5.53 | 11.33 | ||||||||||||||||||||
SRF2 | 位于曼掌寨附近,属于勐仑自然保护区 The SRF2 is located in a distance of 12 km to Tropical Botanical Garden, where belongs to Xishuangbanna Nature Reserves | 650 | 90~95 | 林地面积较大,周围三面为雨林,一面是农田,样地由坡地构成,周围的雨林下有当地居民种植的砂仁,样地中人为干扰小 Forest area is large, Surrounding vegetation is evergreen broad-leaved forest (three sides) and farmland (one side). Landform of plot is only upland. Although Amomum plants were planted in plot surrounding forest by located people, there is not many human disturbance in the plot | 2.295 | 0.115 | 4.43 | 11.58 |
Table 1 Habitat and soil characteristics of two tropical seasonal rain forest plots in Xishuangbanna
样地 Plots | 位置 Sites | 海拔 Altitude (m) | 盖度 Cover (%) | 样地环境 Environment of plot | 有机质 Organic matter (%) | 全氮 Total N (%) | pH | C/N | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRF1 | 位于勐昆公路55 km,属勐仑自然保护区,是CERN在西双版纳热带雨林定位研究样地 The SRF1 is located in a distance of 15 km to Tropical Botanical Garden, where belong to Xishuangbanna Nature Reserves. It is also field site for CERN study | 750 | 90~95 | 林地面积较大,周围主要是常绿阔叶林,样地包括坡度较大的坡地和平缓的冲积地,人为干扰较小 Forest area is large. Evergreen broad-leaved forest is surrounding vegetation. Landform of plot include riparian and upland. Human disturbance in the plot is light | 2.713 | 0.140 | 5.53 | 11.33 | ||||||||||||||||||||
SRF2 | 位于曼掌寨附近,属于勐仑自然保护区 The SRF2 is located in a distance of 12 km to Tropical Botanical Garden, where belongs to Xishuangbanna Nature Reserves | 650 | 90~95 | 林地面积较大,周围三面为雨林,一面是农田,样地由坡地构成,周围的雨林下有当地居民种植的砂仁,样地中人为干扰小 Forest area is large, Surrounding vegetation is evergreen broad-leaved forest (three sides) and farmland (one side). Landform of plot is only upland. Although Amomum plants were planted in plot surrounding forest by located people, there is not many human disturbance in the plot | 2.295 | 0.115 | 4.43 | 11.58 |
Fig.1 Dry weight remaining as a percentage of initial mass in decomposing leaf litter in the litterbags with two different mesh size in two tropical rain forest plots Asterisks indicate a significance within mesh size during decomposition day (p<0.05,n=5)
样地 Plots | 网孔 Mesh size (mm) | 分解率指数 k (Mean±SD) | R2 | 年失重率 Mass loss (% a-1) | 3/k (a) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRF1 | 2 | 1.884±0.213A | 0.723 | 71.226A | 1.592 |
0.15 | 0.478±0.346B | 0.667 | 34.797B | 6.276 | |
SRF2 | 2 | 2.437±0.364C | 0.911 | 71.020A | 1.231 |
0.15 | 0.582±0.179B | 0.834 | 35.698B | 5.155 |
Table 2 Comparison of decomposition characteristics of leaf litter in the litterbags with two different mesh size in two tropical rain forest plots
样地 Plots | 网孔 Mesh size (mm) | 分解率指数 k (Mean±SD) | R2 | 年失重率 Mass loss (% a-1) | 3/k (a) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRF1 | 2 | 1.884±0.213A | 0.723 | 71.226A | 1.592 |
0.15 | 0.478±0.346B | 0.667 | 34.797B | 6.276 | |
SRF2 | 2 | 2.437±0.364C | 0.911 | 71.020A | 1.231 |
0.15 | 0.582±0.179B | 0.834 | 35.698B | 5.155 |
时间 Day (d) | 样地 Plot | 网孔(mm) Mesh size | C (%) | N (%) | P (mg·g-1) | S (mg·g-1) | K (mg·g-1) | Ca (mg·g-1) | Mg (mg·g-1) | C/N | C/P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | SRF1 | 2 | 52.887 | 1.287 | 0.777 | 1.777 | 4.660 | 15.907 | 2.697 | 41.112 | 681.442 |
0.15 | 52.887 | 1.287 | 0.777 | 1.777 | 4.660 | 15.907 | 2.697 | 41.112 | 681.442 | ||
SRF2 | 2 | 50.095 | 0.990 | 0.710 | 1.410 | 3.230 | 23.320 | 3.330 | 50.872 | 706.715 | |
0.15 | 50.095 | 0.990 | 0.710 | 1.410 | 3.230 | 23.320 | 3.330 | 50.872 | 706.715 | ||
60 | SRF1 | 2 | 51.464 | 1.338 | 0.684 | 1.668 | 1.124 | 21.620 | 2.200 | 38.518 | 764.278 |
0.15 | 52.074 | 1.398 | 0.586 | 1.656 | 1.310 | 22.072 | 2.520 | 37.364 | 890.132 | ||
SRF2 | 2 | 49.316 | 1.484 | 0.782 | 1.482 | 1.016 | 25.380 | 2.880 | 33.600 | 636.054 | |
0.15 | 51.678 | 1.452 | 0.700 | 1.554 | 1.632 | 23.706 | 2.786 | 35.593 | 738.546 | ||
120 | SRF1 | 2 | 42.874 | 1.498 | 0.858 | 1.602 | 1.234 | 19.376 | 1.820 | 28.769 | 505.641 |
0.15 | 50.404 | 1.544 | 0.648 | 1.794 | 0.684 | 22.322 | 2.242 | 32.723 | 794.131 | ||
SRF2 | 2 | 42.030 | 1.426 | 0.836 | 1.366 | 0.990 | 24.358 | 2.372 | 29.832 | 505.181 | |
0.15 | 49.758 | 1.556 | 0.792 | 1.648 | 0.874 | 24.684 | 2.560 | 31.765 | 635.371 | ||
180 | SRF1 | 2 | 41.280 | 1.622 | 1.022 | 1.688 | 1.760 | 21.330 | 1.978 | 25.482 | 405.523 |
0.15 | 46.342 | 1.636 | 0.722 | 1.852 | 1.588 | 22.074 | 2.640 | 28.463 | 648.485 | ||
SRF2 | 2 | 38.438 | 1.718 | 1.080 | 1.530 | 1.184 | 22.052 | 2.658 | 22.688 | 356.291 | |
0.15 | 46.708 | 1.822 | 1.052 | 1.944 | 0.856 | 29.404 | 3.546 | 26.247 | 449.102 | ||
240 | SRF1 | 2 | 35.306 | 1.526 | 0.836 | 1.562 | 1.830 | 18.520 | 1.830 | 23.184 | 430.773 |
0.15 | 48.160 | 1.690 | 0.700 | 1.905 | 1.248 | 24.275 | 2.795 | 28.986 | 712.654 | ||
SRF2 | 2 | 38.488 | 1.644 | 0.876 | 1.300 | 1.032 | 21.034 | 2.346 | 23.511 | 458.517 | |
0.15 | 47.582 | 1.778 | 0.926 | 1.884 | 0.984 | 28.514 | 3.150 | 28.020 | 519.262 | ||
300 | SRF1 | 2 | 32.554 | 1.412 | 0.768 | 1.462 | 2.186 | 16.444 | 1.916 | 22.813 | 432.406 |
0.15 | 46.444 | 1.592 | 0.722 | 1.844 | 1.458 | 23.744 | 2.414 | 29.237 | 648.585 | ||
SRF2 | 2 | 36.122 | 1.788 | 0.807 | 1.518 | 1.478 | 22.116 | 2.394 | 20.460 | 964.581 | |
0.15 | 45.884 | 1.754 | 0.922 | 1.800 | 1.010 | 26.852 | 2.850 | 26.166 | 499.937 | ||
360 | SRF1 | 2 | 38.238 | 1.770 | 0.914 | 1.682 | 2.086 | 19.216 | 1.908 | 21.744 | 425.401 |
0.15 | 43.292 | 1.654 | 0.724 | 1.868 | 2.032 | 22.700 | 2.614 | 26.157 | 599.982 | ||
SRF2 | 2 | 37.678 | 1.846 | 0.972 | 1.630 | 1.324 | 22.384 | 2.222 | 19.867 | 389.353 | |
0.15 | 44.890 | 1.882 | 0.962 | 1.974 | 1.110 | 25.830 | 3.050 | 24.624 | 489.471 |
Table 3 Change in nutrient concentrations in decomposing leaf litter in the litterbags with two different mesh size in two tropical rain forest plots (mean of replication, n=5)
时间 Day (d) | 样地 Plot | 网孔(mm) Mesh size | C (%) | N (%) | P (mg·g-1) | S (mg·g-1) | K (mg·g-1) | Ca (mg·g-1) | Mg (mg·g-1) | C/N | C/P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | SRF1 | 2 | 52.887 | 1.287 | 0.777 | 1.777 | 4.660 | 15.907 | 2.697 | 41.112 | 681.442 |
0.15 | 52.887 | 1.287 | 0.777 | 1.777 | 4.660 | 15.907 | 2.697 | 41.112 | 681.442 | ||
SRF2 | 2 | 50.095 | 0.990 | 0.710 | 1.410 | 3.230 | 23.320 | 3.330 | 50.872 | 706.715 | |
0.15 | 50.095 | 0.990 | 0.710 | 1.410 | 3.230 | 23.320 | 3.330 | 50.872 | 706.715 | ||
60 | SRF1 | 2 | 51.464 | 1.338 | 0.684 | 1.668 | 1.124 | 21.620 | 2.200 | 38.518 | 764.278 |
0.15 | 52.074 | 1.398 | 0.586 | 1.656 | 1.310 | 22.072 | 2.520 | 37.364 | 890.132 | ||
SRF2 | 2 | 49.316 | 1.484 | 0.782 | 1.482 | 1.016 | 25.380 | 2.880 | 33.600 | 636.054 | |
0.15 | 51.678 | 1.452 | 0.700 | 1.554 | 1.632 | 23.706 | 2.786 | 35.593 | 738.546 | ||
120 | SRF1 | 2 | 42.874 | 1.498 | 0.858 | 1.602 | 1.234 | 19.376 | 1.820 | 28.769 | 505.641 |
0.15 | 50.404 | 1.544 | 0.648 | 1.794 | 0.684 | 22.322 | 2.242 | 32.723 | 794.131 | ||
SRF2 | 2 | 42.030 | 1.426 | 0.836 | 1.366 | 0.990 | 24.358 | 2.372 | 29.832 | 505.181 | |
0.15 | 49.758 | 1.556 | 0.792 | 1.648 | 0.874 | 24.684 | 2.560 | 31.765 | 635.371 | ||
180 | SRF1 | 2 | 41.280 | 1.622 | 1.022 | 1.688 | 1.760 | 21.330 | 1.978 | 25.482 | 405.523 |
0.15 | 46.342 | 1.636 | 0.722 | 1.852 | 1.588 | 22.074 | 2.640 | 28.463 | 648.485 | ||
SRF2 | 2 | 38.438 | 1.718 | 1.080 | 1.530 | 1.184 | 22.052 | 2.658 | 22.688 | 356.291 | |
0.15 | 46.708 | 1.822 | 1.052 | 1.944 | 0.856 | 29.404 | 3.546 | 26.247 | 449.102 | ||
240 | SRF1 | 2 | 35.306 | 1.526 | 0.836 | 1.562 | 1.830 | 18.520 | 1.830 | 23.184 | 430.773 |
0.15 | 48.160 | 1.690 | 0.700 | 1.905 | 1.248 | 24.275 | 2.795 | 28.986 | 712.654 | ||
SRF2 | 2 | 38.488 | 1.644 | 0.876 | 1.300 | 1.032 | 21.034 | 2.346 | 23.511 | 458.517 | |
0.15 | 47.582 | 1.778 | 0.926 | 1.884 | 0.984 | 28.514 | 3.150 | 28.020 | 519.262 | ||
300 | SRF1 | 2 | 32.554 | 1.412 | 0.768 | 1.462 | 2.186 | 16.444 | 1.916 | 22.813 | 432.406 |
0.15 | 46.444 | 1.592 | 0.722 | 1.844 | 1.458 | 23.744 | 2.414 | 29.237 | 648.585 | ||
SRF2 | 2 | 36.122 | 1.788 | 0.807 | 1.518 | 1.478 | 22.116 | 2.394 | 20.460 | 964.581 | |
0.15 | 45.884 | 1.754 | 0.922 | 1.800 | 1.010 | 26.852 | 2.850 | 26.166 | 499.937 | ||
360 | SRF1 | 2 | 38.238 | 1.770 | 0.914 | 1.682 | 2.086 | 19.216 | 1.908 | 21.744 | 425.401 |
0.15 | 43.292 | 1.654 | 0.724 | 1.868 | 2.032 | 22.700 | 2.614 | 26.157 | 599.982 | ||
SRF2 | 2 | 37.678 | 1.846 | 0.972 | 1.630 | 1.324 | 22.384 | 2.222 | 19.867 | 389.353 | |
0.15 | 44.890 | 1.882 | 0.962 | 1.974 | 1.110 | 25.830 | 3.050 | 24.624 | 489.471 |
Fig.2 Change in absolute amount of nutrient in decomposing 1eaf litter in the litter-bags with two different mesh size in two tropical rain forest plots (mean of replic ation, n=5) 1 Legends see Fig. 1
贡献率 Contribution (%) | df | F | p | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRF1 年均值±标准差Mean±SD | SRF2 年均值±标准差Mean±SD | ||||
凋落叶Leaf litter | 46.088±6.715A | 45.604±5.435A | 5 | 0.016 | 0.299>0.05 |
C | 44.242±6.592A | 49.460±8.176B | 5 | 1.234 | 0.003<0.05 |
N | 65.091±10.363A | 111.673±23.116B | 5 | 16.906 | 0.000 09<0.05 |
P | 34.133±7.237A | 64.639±6.078B | 5 | 52.095 | 0.002<0.05 |
S | 50.653±8.012A | 70.061±5.721A | 5 | 19.433 | 0.377>0.05 |
K | 12.633±5.237A | 15.407±4.082A | 5 | 0.873 | 0.064>0.05 |
Ca | 117.914±67.275A | 52.111±12.647A | 5 | 4.620 | 0.273>0.05 |
Mg | 49.387±9.456A | 10.692±72.879A | 5 | 1.386 | 0.903>0.05 |
Table 4 The average of the mass loss and element loss contributed by the soil maro-mesofauna in two tropical rain forest plots
贡献率 Contribution (%) | df | F | p | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRF1 年均值±标准差Mean±SD | SRF2 年均值±标准差Mean±SD | ||||
凋落叶Leaf litter | 46.088±6.715A | 45.604±5.435A | 5 | 0.016 | 0.299>0.05 |
C | 44.242±6.592A | 49.460±8.176B | 5 | 1.234 | 0.003<0.05 |
N | 65.091±10.363A | 111.673±23.116B | 5 | 16.906 | 0.000 09<0.05 |
P | 34.133±7.237A | 64.639±6.078B | 5 | 52.095 | 0.002<0.05 |
S | 50.653±8.012A | 70.061±5.721A | 5 | 19.433 | 0.377>0.05 |
K | 12.633±5.237A | 15.407±4.082A | 5 | 0.873 | 0.064>0.05 |
Ca | 117.914±67.275A | 52.111±12.647A | 5 | 4.620 | 0.273>0.05 |
Mg | 49.387±9.456A | 10.692±72.879A | 5 | 1.386 | 0.903>0.05 |
Fig.3 Comparison of relative density of orders and individuals of soil fauna in the litterbags with two different mesh size in two tropical rain forest plots (mean±SD) Different capital letters for a same forest type indicate significant difference among the different mesh size, and different small letters within the same mesh size indicate significant difference between the forest type at p=0.05, n=5
[1] | Anderson JM (1988). Invertebrate-mediated transport process in soils. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 24,5-19. |
[2] | Benckiser G (1997). Fauna in Soil Ecosystems: Recycling, Nutrient Fluxes,and Agricultural Production. Basel and Hong Kong Press, New York. |
[3] | Coleman DC, Crossley DA Jr (1996). Fundamentals of Soil Ecology. Academic Press, New York. |
[4] |
Enriquez S, Duarte CM, Sand-Jensen K (1993). Patterns in decomposition rates among photosynthetic organisms: the importance of detritus C∶N∶P content. Oecologia, 94,457-471.
DOI URL PMID |
[5] | González G, Seastedt TR (2001). Soil fauna and plant litter decomposition in tropical and subalpine forests. Ecology, 82,955-964. |
[6] |
González G, Ley RE, Schmidt SK, Zou X, Seastedt TR (2001). Soil ecological interactions: comparisons between tropical and subalpine forests. Oecologia, 128,549-556.
URL PMID |
[7] |
Hanlon RDG, Anderson JM (1979). The effects of Collembola grazing on microbial activity in decomposing leaf litter. Oecologia, 38,93-99.
DOI URL PMID |
[8] | Heneghan L, Coleman DC, Zou X, Crossley DA Jr, Haines BL (1999). Soil microarthropod contributions to decomposition dynamics: tropical-temperate comparisons of a single substrate. Ecology, 80,1873-1882. |
[9] | Huang JH(黄建辉), Chen LZ(陈灵芝), Han XG(韩兴国) (1998). Advance in litter decomposition in forest ecosystems. In: Li CS(李承森) ed. Advances in Plant Sciences(植物科学进展). Higher Education Press, Beijing,218-236. (in Chinese) |
[10] | Hunter MD, Sina A, Catherine MP, Coleman DC (2003). Relative effects of macroinvertebrates and habitat on the chemistry of litter during decomposition. Pedobiologia, 47,101-115. |
[11] | Irmler U (2000). Changes in the fauna and its contribution to mass loss and N release during leaf litter decomposition in two deciduous forests. Pedobiologia, 44,105-118. |
[12] | Liao CH(廖崇惠), Chen MQ(陈茂乾), Chen JH(陈锦华) (1992). Population ecology of two species of terrestrial isopods and their role in litter decomposition. Acta Zoologica Sinica (动物学报), 38,23-30. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] | Liao CH(廖崇惠), Lin SM(林少明), Li JX(李健雄), Chen JH(陈锦华), Huang HT(黄海涛) (1995). A comparative study of soil animals on litter decomposition in varied types of artificial forests. Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 15(Suppl.),198-203. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[14] | Liu ZG, Zou XM (2002). Exotic earthworms accelerate plant litter decomposition in a Puerto Rican pasture and a wet forest. Ecological Applications 12,1406-1417. |
[15] | Luxton M (1982). General ecological influence of the soil fauna on decomposition and nutrient circulation. Oikos, 39,355-357. |
[16] | Martin KD, Scott W (1997). Litter decomposition and nitrogen dynamics in aspen forest and mixed-grass prairie. Ecology, 78,732-739. |
[17] | Magurran AE (1988). Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton. |
[18] |
Matthew WW, Zou X (2002). Soil macrofauna and litter nutrients in three tropical tree plantation on a disturbed site in Puerto Rico. Forest Ecology and Management, 170,161-171.
DOI URL |
[19] | State Forestry Administration of China(国家林业局)(1999). Forest Soil Analysis Methods, P. R. China—Forest Vocation Standard LY/T 1210-1275-1999(中华人民共和国林业行业标准——森林土壤分析方法). China Standard Publisher, Beijing,. (in Chinese) |
[20] | Olson JS (1963). Energy storage and the balance of producer and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology, 44,322-331. |
[21] | Reddy MV, Venkataiah B (1989). Influence of microarthropod abundance and climatic factors on weight loss and mineral nutrients of Eucalyptus leaf litter during decomposition . Biology Fertilizer Soils, 8,319-324. |
[22] | Reddy MV (1992). Effect of microarthropod abundance and abiotic variables on mass loss and concentration of nutrients during decomposition of Azadirachta indica leaf litter . Tropical Ecology, 33,89-96. |
[23] | Ren YH(任泳红), Cao M(曹敏), Tang JW(唐建维), Tang Y(唐勇), Zhang JH(张建侯) (1999). A comparative study on litterfall dynamics in a seasonal rain forest and a rubber plantation in Xishuangbanna, SW, China. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica(植物生态学报), 23,418-425. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[24] | Schlesinger WH (1997). Biogeochemistry: an Analysis of Global Change 2nd edn. Academic Press, California. |
[25] | Seastedt TR (1984). The role of microarthropods in decomposition and mineralisation process. Annual Review of Entomology, 29,25-46. |
[26] | Seastedt TR, Crossley DA Jr (1980). Effects of microarthropods on the seasonal dynamics of nutrients in forest litter. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 12,337-342. |
[27] | Swift MJ, Heal OW, Anderson JM (1979). Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London. |
[28] | Tian G, Brussaard L, Kang BT (1993). Biological effects of plant residues with contrasting chemical compositions under humid tropical condition: effects on soil fauna. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 25,731-737. |
[29] | Tian G, Brussaard L, Kang BT (1995). Plant residues decomposition in the humid tropics—influence of chemical composition and soil fauna. In: Reddy MV ed. Soil Organisms and Litter Decomposition in the Tropics. Oxford and IBH Publishing, New Delhi,204-224. |
[30] | Walker LR, Zimmerman JK, Lodge DJ, Guzman-Grajales S (1996). An altitudinal comparison of growth and species composition in hurricane-damaged forests in Puerto Rico. Journal of Ecology, 84,877-889. |
[31] | Yang MX(杨明宪), Ma SC(马树才), Zhang RZ(张容祖) (2000). Mathematical model and community series of effects of soil animals on litter decomposition. In:Yin WY(尹文英)ed. Soil Animals of China(中国土壤动物). Science Press, Beijing,108-115. (in Chinese) |
[32] | Yang XD(杨效东) (2004). Dynamics and community structure of soil meso-microarthropods during leaf litter decomposition in tropical seasonal rain forests of Xishuangbanna, Yunnan. Biodiversity Science (生物多样性), 12,252-261. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[33] | Yin WY(尹文英) (1992). Subtropical Soil Animals of China (中国亚热带土壤动物). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[34] | Yin WY(尹文英) (1998). Pictorical Keys to Soil Animals of China(中国土壤动物检索图鉴). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[35] | Zhang XP(张雪萍), Li CY(李春艳), Zhang SC(张思冲) (2001). Study of the function of millipedes in substance decomposition. Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 21,75-79. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[36] | Zheng Z, Shanmughavel P, Sha LQ, Cao M, Warren M (2006). Litter decomposition and nutrient release in a tropical seasonal rain forest of Xishuangbanna, Southwest China. Biotropica, 38,342-347. |
[37] | Zhong WY(钟伟彦), Yin XQ(殷秀琴), Chen P(陈鹏) (1999). Relationship of litter decomposition and consumption with soil animals in Maoer Mountain forest. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 10,511-512. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[38] | Zhu H (1994). The floristic characteristics of the tropical rain forest in Xishuangbanna. Chinese Geographical Science, 4,174-185. |
[39] | Zou XM, Zucca CP, Waide RB, McDowell WH (1995). Long-term influence of decomposition on tree species composition and litter dynamics of a tropical rain forest in Puerto Rico. Forest Ecology and Management, 78,147-157. |
[1] | Wei-Wei SHE Qin shugao Yan-Gui QIAO Yuqing Zhang. Effects of nitrogen and water addition on leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry of dominant species in an Artemisia ordosica community [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(5): 590-600. |
[2] | HAN Da-Yong, LI Hai-Yan, ZHANG Wei, YANG Yun-Fei. Nutrient transportation and aging process of ramets in Aster pekinensis populations on Songnen grassland, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(2): 192-200. |
[3] | SU Wei, CHEN Ping, WU Ting, LIU Yue, SONG Yu-Ting, LIU Xu-Jun, LIU Ju-Xiu. Effects of nitrogen addition and extended dry season on non-structural carbohydrates, nutrients and biomass of Dalbergia odorifera seedlings [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(8): 1094-1104. |
[4] | ZHANG Hui-Ling, ZHANG Yao-Yi, PENG Qing-Qing, YANG Jing, NI Xiang-Yin, WU Fu-Zhong. Variations of trace-elements resorption efficiency in leaves of different tree species as affected by life forms in a mid-subtropical common garden [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(7): 978-987. |
[5] | RAN Song-Song, YU Zai-Peng, WAN Xiao-Hua, FU Yan-Rong, ZOU Bing-Zhang, WANG Si-Rong, HUANG Zhi-Qun. Effects of neighborhood tree species diversity on foliar nitrogen-phosphorus stoichiometry of Cunninghamia lanceolata [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(7): 932-942. |
[6] | HU Zhao-Yi, CHEN Tian-Song, ZHAO Li, XU Pei-Xuan, WU Zheng-Jiang, DONG Li-Qin, ZHANG Kun. Effect of water level drop on nitrogen and phosphorus reabsorption of Carex muliensis in a herb swamp in Zoigê wetland, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(6): 847-855. |
[7] | ZHONG Qi, LI Zeng-Yan, MA Wei, KUANG Yu-Xiao, QIU Ling-Jun, LI Yun-Jie, TU Li-Hua. Effects of nitrogen addition and litter manipulations on leaf litter decomposition in western edge of Sichuan Basin, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(5): 629-643. |
[8] | HE Xi, FENG Qiu-Hong, ZHANG Pei-Pei, YANG Han, DENG Shao-Jun, SUN Xiao-Ping, YIN Hua-Jun. Altitudinal patterns of nutrient limiting characteristics of Abies fargesii var. faxoniana forest based on leaf and soil enzyme stoichiometry in western Sichuan, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(12): 1646-1657. |
[9] | ZHANG Qi, Yeerjiang BAIKETUERHAN, WANG Juan. Gender dimorphism in nutritional resource requirements of dioecious tree species Rhamnus schneideri var. manshurica [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(12): 1708-1717. |
[10] | LI Wan-Nian, LUO Yi-Min, HUANG Ze-Yue, YANG Mei. Effects of mixed young plantations of Parashorea chinensis on soil microbial functional diversity and carbon source utilization [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(9): 1109-1124. |
[11] | SUN Cai-Li, QIU Mo-Sheng, HUANG Chao-Xiang, WANG Yi-Wei. Characteristics of soil extracellular enzyme activities and their stoichiometry during rocky desertification in southwestern Guizhou, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(7): 834-845. |
[12] | WANG Guang-Ya, CHEN Bing-Hua, HUANG Yu-Chen, JIN Guang-Ze, LIU Zhi-Li. Effects of growing position on leaflet trait variations and its correlations in Fraxinus mandshurica [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(6): 712-721. |
[13] | WU Zan, PENG Yun-Feng, YANG Gui-Biao, LI Qin-Lu, LIU Yang, MA Li-Hua, YANG Yuan-He, JIANG Xian-Jun. Effects of land degradation on soil and microbial stoichiometry in Qingzang Plateau alpine grasslands [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(4): 461-472. |
[14] | ZHANG Ying, ZHANG Chang-Hong, WANG Qi-Tong, ZHU Xiao-Min, YIN Hua-Jun. Difference of microbial nutrient limiting characteristics in rhizosphere and bulk soil of coniferous forests under nitrogen deposition in southwest mountain, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(4): 473-483. |
[15] | ZHANG Qing, YIN Ben-Feng, LI Ji-Wen, LU Yong-Xing, RONG Xiao-Ying, ZHOU Xiao-Bing, ZHANG Bing-Chang, ZHANG Yuan-Ming. Effects of moss mortality on soil enzyme activities in a temperate desert [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(3): 350-361. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn