Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2007, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 305-312.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0035
Special Issue: 碳循环
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
MA Ming-Dong1, JIANG Hong2,3(), LUO Cheng-De1, LIU Yao-Jian1
Received:
2006-03-06
Accepted:
2006-06-27
Online:
2007-03-06
Published:
2007-03-30
MA Ming-Dong, JIANG Hong, LUO Cheng-De, LIU Yao-Jian. PRELIMINARY STUDY OF CARBON DENSITY, NET PRODUCTION AND CARBON STOCK IN NATURAL SPRUCE FORESTS OF NORTHWEST SUBALPINE SICHUAN, CHINA[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2007, 31(2): 305-312.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.17521/cjpe.2007.0035
林分变量 Stand variables | 统计值 Statistical value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最小值 Minimum | 最大值 Maximum | 平均值 Average | 标准差 Standard derivation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
年龄 Age | 27 | 150 | 59.35 | 38.96 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
平均直径 Average diameter breast height (cm) | 9.0 | 23.2 | 18.92 | 4.17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
平均树高 Average height (m) | 6.1 | 20.6 | 14.53 | 3.62 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
每公顷株数 Timber stocking per hectare (株·hm-2) | 325 | 4 500 | 1 096 | 568 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
每公顷蓄积量 Timber stocking per hectare (m3·hm-2) | 32.66 | 898.06 | 180.1 | 112.26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
林分郁闭度 Stand closure (P) | 0.4 | 0.9 | 0.68 | 0.10 |
Table 1 The characteristics of spruce stand sampling plots
林分变量 Stand variables | 统计值 Statistical value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最小值 Minimum | 最大值 Maximum | 平均值 Average | 标准差 Standard derivation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
年龄 Age | 27 | 150 | 59.35 | 38.96 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
平均直径 Average diameter breast height (cm) | 9.0 | 23.2 | 18.92 | 4.17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
平均树高 Average height (m) | 6.1 | 20.6 | 14.53 | 3.62 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
每公顷株数 Timber stocking per hectare (株·hm-2) | 325 | 4 500 | 1 096 | 568 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
每公顷蓄积量 Timber stocking per hectare (m3·hm-2) | 32.66 | 898.06 | 180.1 | 112.26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
林分郁闭度 Stand closure (P) | 0.4 | 0.9 | 0.68 | 0.10 |
器官 Organ | 树干 Trunk | 树皮 Bark | 树枝 Branch | 树叶 Leaf | 树根 Root | 合计 Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
生物量Biomass % | 147.91 69.52 | 6.75 3.18 | 26.34 12.38 | 5.28 2.49 | 26.49 12.45 | 212.77 100.00 |
Table 2 The biomass and allocation percentage of organs in spruce stand tree layer (×103 kg·hm-2)
器官 Organ | 树干 Trunk | 树皮 Bark | 树枝 Branch | 树叶 Leaf | 树根 Root | 合计 Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
生物量Biomass % | 147.91 69.52 | 6.75 3.18 | 26.34 12.38 | 5.28 2.49 | 26.49 12.45 | 212.77 100.00 |
组分 Component | 乔木 Tree | 灌木 Shrub | 草本 Herb | 地被物 Duff layer | 枯落物 Litter | 林分 Foresty |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
生物量 Biomass % | 212.77 92.36 | 11.40 4.95 | 2.71 1.18 | 1.38 0.60 | 2.11 0.91 | 230.37 100.00 |
Table 3 The biomass and allocation percentage of spruce stand (×103 kg·hm-2)
组分 Component | 乔木 Tree | 灌木 Shrub | 草本 Herb | 地被物 Duff layer | 枯落物 Litter | 林分 Foresty |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
生物量 Biomass % | 212.77 92.36 | 11.40 4.95 | 2.71 1.18 | 1.38 0.60 | 2.11 0.91 | 230.37 100.00 |
器官 Organ | 树干 Trunk | 树枝 Branch | 树叶 Leaf | 树皮 Bark | 树根 Root | 平均值 Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
碳密度 Carbon density 变异系数 Variation coefficient (%) | 57.85 7.64 | 51.22 8.75 | 48.27 10.12 | 47.12 6.31 | 52.39 7.24 | 51.37 |
Table 4 The carbon density in different organs of spruce tree (%)
器官 Organ | 树干 Trunk | 树枝 Branch | 树叶 Leaf | 树皮 Bark | 树根 Root | 平均值 Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
碳密度 Carbon density 变异系数 Variation coefficient (%) | 57.85 7.64 | 51.22 8.75 | 48.27 10.12 | 47.12 6.31 | 52.39 7.24 | 51.37 |
项目Items | 灌木Shrub | 草本Herb | 地被物Duff |
---|---|---|---|
平均值Average | 49.91 | 46.34 | 43.21 |
Table 5 The carbon density of understore in spruce stand (%)
项目Items | 灌木Shrub | 草本Herb | 地被物Duff |
---|---|---|---|
平均值Average | 49.91 | 46.34 | 43.21 |
层次 Layers | 组分 Component | 碳密度 Carbon density (%) |
---|---|---|
枯落物 Litter | 未分解枯落物Under composed litter | 48.34 |
半分解枯落物Semi decomposed litter | 45.26 | |
已分解枯落物Decomposed litter | 24.69 | |
平均Average | 39.44 | |
土壤层 Soil layer | 0~20 cm | 2.69 |
20~40 cm | 1.47 | |
40~60 cm | 1.12 | |
60~80 cm | 0.94 | |
80~100 cm | 0.83 | |
平均Average | 1.41 |
Table 6 The carbon density of litter and soil in spruce stands
层次 Layers | 组分 Component | 碳密度 Carbon density (%) |
---|---|---|
枯落物 Litter | 未分解枯落物Under composed litter | 48.34 |
半分解枯落物Semi decomposed litter | 45.26 | |
已分解枯落物Decomposed litter | 24.69 | |
平均Average | 39.44 | |
土壤层 Soil layer | 0~20 cm | 2.69 |
20~40 cm | 1.47 | |
40~60 cm | 1.12 | |
60~80 cm | 0.94 | |
80~100 cm | 0.83 | |
平均Average | 1.41 |
器官Organ | 树干Trunk | 树皮Bark | 树枝Branch | 树叶Leaf | 树根Root | 合计Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
碳贮量Carbon stock % | 85.57 72.11 | 3.18 2.68 | 13.49 11.37 | 2.55 2.15 | 13.88 11.70 | 118.67 100.00 |
Table 7 The carbon stock of each organs in spruce tree layer (×103 kg·hm-2)
器官Organ | 树干Trunk | 树皮Bark | 树枝Branch | 树叶Leaf | 树根Root | 合计Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
碳贮量Carbon stock % | 85.57 72.11 | 3.18 2.68 | 13.49 11.37 | 2.55 2.15 | 13.88 11.70 | 118.67 100.00 |
组分 Component | 生物量Biomass (×103 kg·hm-2) | 碳密度 Carbon density (%) | 碳贮量Carbon stock (×103 kg·hm-2) | 碳贮量百分比 Percentage of carbon stock (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
乔木层Arborous layer | 212.77 | 57.85~47.12(51.37) | 118.67 | 41.91 |
灌木层Shrub layer | 11.40 | 49.91 | 5.69 | 2.01 |
草本层Herb layer | 2.71 | 46.34 | 1.26 | 0.44 |
地被物层Ground cover layer | 1.38 | 43.21 | 0.60 | 0.21 |
枯落物层Litter layer | 2.11 | 48.38~24.69(39.44) | 0.83 | 0.29 |
土壤层Soil layer | ||||
0~20 cm | 2 046 | 2.69 | 55.04 | 19.44 |
20~40 cm | 2 137 | 1.47 | 31.41 | 11.10 |
40~60 cm | 2 350 | 1.12 | 26.32 | 9.30 |
60~80 cm | 2 413 | 0.94 | 22.68 | 8.00 |
80~100 cm | 2 489 | 0.83 | 20.66 | 7.30 |
合计Total | 283.16 | 100.00 |
Table 8 The distribution of carbon stock in spruce stand
组分 Component | 生物量Biomass (×103 kg·hm-2) | 碳密度 Carbon density (%) | 碳贮量Carbon stock (×103 kg·hm-2) | 碳贮量百分比 Percentage of carbon stock (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
乔木层Arborous layer | 212.77 | 57.85~47.12(51.37) | 118.67 | 41.91 |
灌木层Shrub layer | 11.40 | 49.91 | 5.69 | 2.01 |
草本层Herb layer | 2.71 | 46.34 | 1.26 | 0.44 |
地被物层Ground cover layer | 1.38 | 43.21 | 0.60 | 0.21 |
枯落物层Litter layer | 2.11 | 48.38~24.69(39.44) | 0.83 | 0.29 |
土壤层Soil layer | ||||
0~20 cm | 2 046 | 2.69 | 55.04 | 19.44 |
20~40 cm | 2 137 | 1.47 | 31.41 | 11.10 |
40~60 cm | 2 350 | 1.12 | 26.32 | 9.30 |
60~80 cm | 2 413 | 0.94 | 22.68 | 8.00 |
80~100 cm | 2 489 | 0.83 | 20.66 | 7.30 |
合计Total | 283.16 | 100.00 |
群落类型 Community type | 碳贮量Carbon stock | 计 Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
乔木 Arborous | 灌木 Shrub | 草本 Herb | 地被物 Duff | 枯落物 Litter | ||
偏干灌木-云杉 Dry shrub-Picea asperata | 160.39 | 6.60 | 1.13 | 0.66 | 0.17 | 168.95 |
中生箭竹-云杉 Medium tagesia bamboo-Picea asperata | 219.69 | 6.83 | 0.87 | 0.54 | 0.12 | 228.05 |
干性草类-云杉 Dry herb-Picea asperata | 85.53 | 2.84 | 1.76 | 0.42 | 0.19 | 90.74 |
阴湿苔藓-云杉 Humid moss-Picea asperata | 59.49 | 2.28 | 0.63 | 0.72 | 0.10 | 63.22 |
Table 9 Carbon stock of four typical communities in natural spruce forest (×103 kg·hm-2)
群落类型 Community type | 碳贮量Carbon stock | 计 Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
乔木 Arborous | 灌木 Shrub | 草本 Herb | 地被物 Duff | 枯落物 Litter | ||
偏干灌木-云杉 Dry shrub-Picea asperata | 160.39 | 6.60 | 1.13 | 0.66 | 0.17 | 168.95 |
中生箭竹-云杉 Medium tagesia bamboo-Picea asperata | 219.69 | 6.83 | 0.87 | 0.54 | 0.12 | 228.05 |
干性草类-云杉 Dry herb-Picea asperata | 85.53 | 2.84 | 1.76 | 0.42 | 0.19 | 90.74 |
阴湿苔藓-云杉 Humid moss-Picea asperata | 59.49 | 2.28 | 0.63 | 0.72 | 0.10 | 63.22 |
项目Items | 树干Trunk | 树皮Bark | 树枝Branch | 树叶Leaf | 根系Root | 合计Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均净生产量 Average net production | 2 507 | 233 | 616 | 344 | 976 | 4 676 |
占乔木层总量百分数 Percentage of tree layer (%) | 53.62 | 4.99 | 13.18 | 7.36 | 20.88 | 100.00 |
Table 10 Average net production of spruce tree layers (kg·hm-2·a-1)
项目Items | 树干Trunk | 树皮Bark | 树枝Branch | 树叶Leaf | 根系Root | 合计Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均净生产量 Average net production | 2 507 | 233 | 616 | 344 | 976 | 4 676 |
占乔木层总量百分数 Percentage of tree layer (%) | 53.62 | 4.99 | 13.18 | 7.36 | 20.88 | 100.00 |
项目 Items | 乔木层 Tree | 灌木层 Shrub | 草本层 Herb | 地被物层 Duff layer | 合计Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均净生产量Average net production | 4 676 | 1 140 | 677.5 | 345.0 | 6 838.5 |
占乔木层总量百分数Percentage(%) | 68.38 | 16.67 | 9.90 | 5.05 | 100.00 |
Table 11 Average net production of spruce stand (kg·hm-2·a-1)
项目 Items | 乔木层 Tree | 灌木层 Shrub | 草本层 Herb | 地被物层 Duff layer | 合计Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均净生产量Average net production | 4 676 | 1 140 | 677.5 | 345.0 | 6 838.5 |
占乔木层总量百分数Percentage(%) | 68.38 | 16.67 | 9.90 | 5.05 | 100.00 |
组分 Component | 净生产量 Net production (kg·hm-2·a-1) | 占林分净生产量百分比 Percentage of stand (%) | 碳素年净固定量 Net sequestration (kg C·hm-2·a-1) | 占林分碳素年净 固定量百分比 Percentage of stand (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
树干Trunk | 2 507 | 36.66 | 1 450.30 | 40.45 |
树皮Bark | 233 | 3.4 | 109.79 | 3.06 |
树枝Branch | 616 | 9.00 | 315.52 | 8.80 |
树叶Leaf | 344 | 5.03 | 166.05 | 4.63 |
树根Root | 976 | 14.27 | 511.33 | 14.26 |
乔木层Arborous layer | 4 676 | 68.38 | 2 552.99 | 71.21 |
灌木层Shrub layer | 1 140 | 16.67 | 568.97 | 15.87 |
草本层Herb layer | 677.5 | 9.90 | 313.95 | 8.76 |
地被物层Ground cover layer | 345.0 | 5.05 | 149.07 | 4.16 |
计Total | 6 838.5 | 100.00 | 3 584.98 | 100.00 |
Table 12 Net production and carbon sequestration of each component in spruce stand
组分 Component | 净生产量 Net production (kg·hm-2·a-1) | 占林分净生产量百分比 Percentage of stand (%) | 碳素年净固定量 Net sequestration (kg C·hm-2·a-1) | 占林分碳素年净 固定量百分比 Percentage of stand (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
树干Trunk | 2 507 | 36.66 | 1 450.30 | 40.45 |
树皮Bark | 233 | 3.4 | 109.79 | 3.06 |
树枝Branch | 616 | 9.00 | 315.52 | 8.80 |
树叶Leaf | 344 | 5.03 | 166.05 | 4.63 |
树根Root | 976 | 14.27 | 511.33 | 14.26 |
乔木层Arborous layer | 4 676 | 68.38 | 2 552.99 | 71.21 |
灌木层Shrub layer | 1 140 | 16.67 | 568.97 | 15.87 |
草本层Herb layer | 677.5 | 9.90 | 313.95 | 8.76 |
地被物层Ground cover layer | 345.0 | 5.05 | 149.07 | 4.16 |
计Total | 6 838.5 | 100.00 | 3 584.98 | 100.00 |
群落类型 Community type | 林分密度 Density (株·hm-2) | 林龄 Age (a) | 净生产量 Net production | 碳素年净固定量 Annual net carbon sequestration | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
乔木 Tree | 灌木 Shrub | 草本 Herb | 地被物 Duff | 计 Total | 乔木 Tree | 灌木 Shrub | 草本 Herb | 地被物 Duff | 计 Total | |||
偏干灌木-云杉 Dry shrub- Picea asperata | 1 025 | 60 | 5 204 | 1 322.4 | 609.75 | 379.5 | 7 515.65 | 2 673 | 660.00 | 282.56 | 163.98 | 3 779.54 |
中生箭竹-云杉 Medium tagesia bamboo- Picea asperata | 1 083 | 86 | 4 973 | 1 368 | 474.25 | 310.5 | 7 125.75 | 2 555 | 682.77 | 219.77 | 134.17 | 3 591.71 |
干性草类-云杉 Dry herb- Picea asperata | 1 167 | 35 | 4 757 | 570 | 948.50 | 241.5 | 6 517.0 | 2 444 | 284.49 | 493.53 | 104.35 | 3 272.37 |
阴湿苔藓-云杉 Humid moss- Picea asperata | 933 | 47 | 2 464 | 456 | 338.75 | 414.0 | 3 672.75 | 1 266 | 227.59 | 156.98 | 178.89 | 1 829.46 |
Table 13 The net production and carbon sequestration in different spruce stands (kg·hm-2·a-1)
群落类型 Community type | 林分密度 Density (株·hm-2) | 林龄 Age (a) | 净生产量 Net production | 碳素年净固定量 Annual net carbon sequestration | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
乔木 Tree | 灌木 Shrub | 草本 Herb | 地被物 Duff | 计 Total | 乔木 Tree | 灌木 Shrub | 草本 Herb | 地被物 Duff | 计 Total | |||
偏干灌木-云杉 Dry shrub- Picea asperata | 1 025 | 60 | 5 204 | 1 322.4 | 609.75 | 379.5 | 7 515.65 | 2 673 | 660.00 | 282.56 | 163.98 | 3 779.54 |
中生箭竹-云杉 Medium tagesia bamboo- Picea asperata | 1 083 | 86 | 4 973 | 1 368 | 474.25 | 310.5 | 7 125.75 | 2 555 | 682.77 | 219.77 | 134.17 | 3 591.71 |
干性草类-云杉 Dry herb- Picea asperata | 1 167 | 35 | 4 757 | 570 | 948.50 | 241.5 | 6 517.0 | 2 444 | 284.49 | 493.53 | 104.35 | 3 272.37 |
阴湿苔藓-云杉 Humid moss- Picea asperata | 933 | 47 | 2 464 | 456 | 338.75 | 414.0 | 3 672.75 | 1 266 | 227.59 | 156.98 | 178.89 | 1 829.46 |
[1] | Bao XC(鲍显诚) (1984). Biomass of Oriental oak forest. Acta Phytoecologica et Geobotanic Sinica(植物生态学与地植物丛刊), 8,313-320. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[2] | Chen LZ (陈灵芝) (1986). Biomass research of Robinia pseudoacacia L. in Xi'shan, Beijing. Acta Botanica Sinica (植物学报), 28,201-208. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[3] |
Fang JY, Chen AP, Peng CH (2001). Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998. Science, 292,2320-2322.
URL PMID |
[4] | Fang X(方晰), Tian DL(田大伦) 2003. Productivity and carbon dynamics of masson pine plantation. Journal of Central South Forestry University(中南林学院学报), 23(2),11-15. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[5] | Fang JY, Wang GG, Liu GH (1998). Forest biomass of China: an estimation based on the biomass-volume relationship. Ecological Applications, 8,1084-1091. |
[6] | Feng ZW(冯宗炜) (1982). Biomass measure of Pinus massoniana in Huitong, Hunan. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 18(2),127-134. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[7] | Feng ZW (冯宗炜) (1983). Biomass and nutrient element distribution of Michelia macclurei artificial forest. Journal of Northeast Forestry College(东北林学院学报), 11(2),13-19. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[8] | Houghton RA, Hackler JL, Lawrence KT (1999). The US carbon budget: contributions from land-use change. Science, 285,574-578. |
[9] | Jiang H (江洪) (1986). The preliminary analysis of net primary productivity in natural spruce forests. Acta Botanica Sinica (植物学报), 28,538-548. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[10] | Jiang H, Apps ML, Peng CH (2002). Modeling the influence of harvesting on Chinese boreal forest carbon dynamics. Forest Ecology and Management, 169,65-82. |
[11] | Jiang H, Apps MJ, Zhang YL (1999). Modelling the spatial pattern of net primary productivity in Chinese forests. Ecological Modeling, 122,275-288. |
[12] | Lei PF(雷丕锋), Xiang WH(项文化), Tian DL(田大伦) (2004). Carbon storage and distribution in Cinnamomum camphora Plantation. Chinese Journal of Ecology(生态学杂志), 23(4),25-30. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] | Li XM(李学明) (1984). Biomass measure of Larix kaempferi. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology(四川林业科技), 5(1),27-29. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[14] | Ma MD(马明东), Liu YJ(刘跃建) (2006). Comparative analysis on the environmental factors of spruce stand through four mathematical methods. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture(中国生态农业学报), 14(1),196-210. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[15] | Pan WC (潘维俦) (1981). Study on nutrient cycle of Chinese fir. Journal of Central South Forestry University(中南林学院学报), 1(1),1-21. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[16] | Post WM, Emanuel WR, Zinke PJ (1982). Soil pools and world life zone. Nature, 298,156-159. |
[17] |
Woodwell GM, Whittaker RH, Reiners WA (1978). The biota and the world carbon budget. Science, 199,141-146.
DOI URL PMID |
[18] | Yao Y(姚迎九), Kang WX(康文星), Tian DL(田大伦) (2003). Study of the biomass and productivity of Cinnamomum camphora plantation. Journal of Central South Forestry University(中南林学院学报), 23(1),1~5. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[19] | Zhou GM (周国模), Jiang PK (姜培坤) (2004). Density storage and spatial distribution of carbon in Phyllostachys pubescens forest. Scientia Silvae Sinicae(林业科学), 40(6),20~24. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | ZHANG Liang, WANG Zhi-Lei, XUE Ting-Ting, HAO Xiao-Yun, YANG Chen-Lu, GAO Fei-Fei, WANG Ying, HAN Xing, LI Hua, WANG Hua. Progress in studies of carbon source/sink and emission reduction strategies in vineyard ecosystem [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2020, 44(3): 179-191. |
[2] | ZHOU Xu-Li, CAI Qiong, XIONG Xin-Yu, FANGWen-Jing, ZHU Jian-Xiao, ZHU Jiang-Ling, FANG Jing-Yun, JI Cheng-Jun. Ecosystem carbon stock and within-system distribution in successional Fagus lucida forests in Mt. Yueliang, Guizhou, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2018, 42(7): 703-712. |
[3] | CEN Yu, WANG Cheng-Dong, ZHANG Zhen, REN Xia, LIU Mei-Zhen, YANG Fan. Spatial distributions of biomass and carbon density in natural grasslands of Hebei, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2018, 42(3): 265-276. |
[4] | YANG Hao-Tian, WANG Zeng-Ru, JIA Rong-Liang. Distribution and storage of soil organic carbon across the desert grasslands in the southeastern fringe of the Tengger Desert, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2018, 42(3): 288-296. |
[5] | YAN Bao-Long, WANG Zhong-Wu, QU Zhi-Qiang, WANG Jing, HAN Guo-Dong. Effects of enclosure on carbon density of plant-soil system in typical steppe and desert steppe in Nei Mongol, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2018, 42(3): 327-336. |
[6] | LI Xu-Hua, SUN Osbert Jianxin. Testing parameter sensitivities and uncertainty analysis of Biome-BGC model in simulating carbon and water fluxes in broadleaved-Korean pine forests [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2018, 42(12): 1131-1144. |
[7] | Ya-Lin WANG, Rong GONG, Feng-Min WU, Wen-Wu FAN. Temporal and spatial variation characteristics of China shrubland net primary production and its response to climate change from 2001 to 2013 [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2017, 41(9): 925-937. |
[8] | Xi LI, Fang WANG, Yang CAO, Shou-Zhang PENG, Yun-Ming CHEN. Soil carbon storage and its determinants in the forests of Shaanxi Province, China [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2017, 41(9): 953-963. |
[9] | Guang-Shuai CUI, Lin ZHANG, Wei SHEN, Xin-Sheng LIU, Yuan-Tao WANG. Biomass allocation and carbon density of Sophora moorcroftiana shrublands in the middle reaches of Yarlung Zangbo River, Xizang, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2017, 41(1): 53-61. |
[10] | Lu-Cun YANG, Chang-Bin LI, Yi NING, Xiu-Qing NIE, Wen-Hua XU, Guo-Ying ZHOU. Carbon density and its spatial distribution in the Potentilla fruticosa dominated alpine shrub in Qinghai, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2017, 41(1): 62-70. |
[11] | Wei ZHAO, Zhong-Min HU, Hao YANG, Lei-Ming ZHANG, Qun GUO, Zhi-Yan WU, De-Yi LIU, Sheng-Gong LI. Carbon density characteristics of sparse Ulmus pumila forest and Populus simonii plantation in Onqin Daga Sandy Land and their relationships with stand age [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2016, 40(4): 318-326. |
[12] | Yu-He JI, Ke GUO, Jian NI, Xiao-Niu XU, Zhi-Gao WANG, Shu-Dong WANG. Current forest carbon stocks and carbon sequestration potential in Anhui Province, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2016, 40(4): 395-404. |
[13] | Yin LI, Guo-Ke CHEN, Dun-Mei LIN, Bin CHEN, Lei-Ming GAO, Xing JIAN, Bo YANG, Wu-Bing XU, Hong-Xin SU, Jiang-Shan LAI, Xi-Hua WANG, Hai-Bo YANG, Ke-Ping MA. Carbon storage and its distribution of forest ecosystems in Zhejiang Province, China [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2016, 40(4): 354-363. |
[14] | Wen-Qiang XU, Liao YANG, Xi CHEN, Ya-Qi GAO, Lei WANG. Carbon storage, spatial distribution and the influence factors in Tianshan forests [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2016, 40(4): 364-373. |
[15] | Xiao-Qiong HUANG, Cun-Lin XIN, Zhong-Min HU, Gang-Tie LI, Tong-Hui ZHANG, Wei ZHAO, Hao YANG, Lei-Min ZHANG, Qun GUO, Yong-Jie YUE, Run-Hong Gao, Zhi-Yan WU, Zhi-Gang YAN, Xin-Ping LIU, Yu-Qiang LI, Sheng-Gong LI. Carbon storage of the forests and its spatial pattern in Nei Mongol, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2016, 40(4): 327-340. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn