Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2008, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 1002-1006.DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.05.004
• Original article • Previous Articles Next Articles
QIU Zong-Bo1,2, LIU Xiao1, LI Fang-Min1, TIAN Xiang-Jun1, YUE Ming1,*()
Received:
2007-02-08
Accepted:
2007-04-26
Online:
2008-02-08
Published:
2008-09-30
Contact:
YUE Ming
QIU Zong-Bo, LIU Xiao, LI Fang-Min, TIAN Xiang-Jun, YUE Ming. INFLUENCE OF He-Ne LASER IRRADIATION ON PROTECTIVE ENZYME ACTIVITIES AND LIPID PEROXIDATION IN WHEAT SEEDLINGS BY DROUGHT STRESS DAMAGE[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2008, 32(5): 1002-1006.
PEG浓度 PEG content (%) | 激光处理时间Treatment time of laser (min) | PEG胁迫处理天数 Time of drought stress (d) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 | ||
0 | 0 | 22.58±1.62 | 27.10±2.05 | 30.13±3.62 | 34.51±3.62 | 32.68±3.06 |
5 | 0 | 31.61±2.85a | 49.70±2.67a | 52.69±17.10a | 54.76±4.52a | 54.19±9.64a |
5 | 1 | 30.11±2.61a | 49.68±4.57a | 52.73±13.79a | 53.63±2.67a | 53.38±2.67a |
5 | 3 | 28.09±2.65a | 48.71±3.89a | 51.18±10.43a | 53.19±7.82a | 51.29±4.52a |
10 | 0 | 34.62±11.37a | 52.69±9.40a | 52.72±11.37a | 56.73±2.67a | 62.76±5.21a |
10 | 1 | 30.60±2.61a | 49.68±4.51a | 48.17±2.61a | 55.27±5.25a | 58.71±4.51a |
10 | 3 | 23.08±2.61b | 44.19±5.64b | 42.15±2.67b | 44.73±2.67b | 49.14±2.67b |
15 | 0 | 35.59±2.67a | 54.63±2.67a | 54.65±4.51a | 58.17±2.67a | 65.23±7.82a |
15 | 1 | 34.59±6.89a | 55.16±6.98a | 54.68±7.82a | 56.67±2.67a | 66.20±9.41a |
15 | 3 | 37.09±8.72a | 54.70±6.89a | 57.66±6.89a | 59.68±4.57a | 67.22±18.25a |
Table 1 The influence of He-Ne laser on MDA content in wheat seedlings under drought stress (μmol·g-1FW)
PEG浓度 PEG content (%) | 激光处理时间Treatment time of laser (min) | PEG胁迫处理天数 Time of drought stress (d) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 | ||
0 | 0 | 22.58±1.62 | 27.10±2.05 | 30.13±3.62 | 34.51±3.62 | 32.68±3.06 |
5 | 0 | 31.61±2.85a | 49.70±2.67a | 52.69±17.10a | 54.76±4.52a | 54.19±9.64a |
5 | 1 | 30.11±2.61a | 49.68±4.57a | 52.73±13.79a | 53.63±2.67a | 53.38±2.67a |
5 | 3 | 28.09±2.65a | 48.71±3.89a | 51.18±10.43a | 53.19±7.82a | 51.29±4.52a |
10 | 0 | 34.62±11.37a | 52.69±9.40a | 52.72±11.37a | 56.73±2.67a | 62.76±5.21a |
10 | 1 | 30.60±2.61a | 49.68±4.51a | 48.17±2.61a | 55.27±5.25a | 58.71±4.51a |
10 | 3 | 23.08±2.61b | 44.19±5.64b | 42.15±2.67b | 44.73±2.67b | 49.14±2.67b |
15 | 0 | 35.59±2.67a | 54.63±2.67a | 54.65±4.51a | 58.17±2.67a | 65.23±7.82a |
15 | 1 | 34.59±6.89a | 55.16±6.98a | 54.68±7.82a | 56.67±2.67a | 66.20±9.41a |
15 | 3 | 37.09±8.72a | 54.70±6.89a | 57.66±6.89a | 59.68±4.57a | 67.22±18.25a |
PEG浓度 PEG content (%) | 激光处理时间Treatment time of laser (min) | PEG胁迫处理天数 Time of drought stress (d) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 | 12d | 15d | |||||
0 | 0 | 1.61±0.62 | 2.44±0.35 | 3.12±0.38 | 3.83±0.28 | 3.52±0.26 | |||||
5 | 0 | 3.22±0.54a | 3.08±0.23a | 4.50±0.10a | 4.68±0.09a | 4.06±0.80a | |||||
5 | 1 | 2.85±1.08a | 2.89±0.06a | 4.26±0.50a | 4.41±0.30a | 3.69±0.52a | |||||
5 | 3 | 1.04±0.13b | 2.61±0.31b | 2.64±0.60b | 3.65±0.80b | 3.02±0.14b | |||||
10 | 0 | 3.45±0.27a | 3.48±0.09a | 4.83±0.30a | 5.05±0.40a | 4.85±0.40a | |||||
10 | 1 | 3.27±0.95a | 3.23±0.09a | 4.28±0.15a | 4.89±0.08a | 4.61±0.58a | |||||
10 | 3 | 3.10±0.59a | 3.11±0.04a | 4.22±0.41a | 4.72±0.48a | 4.49±0.04a | |||||
15 | 0 | 3.48±1.49a | 4.21±0.21a | 4.68±0.53a | 5.62±0.34a | 5.55±0.48a | |||||
15 | 1 | 3.13±0.54a | 4.06±0.56a | 4.86±0.10a | 5.69±0.28a | 5.60±0.52a | |||||
15 | 3 | 3.29±0.82a | 4.05±0.06a | 4.71±0.72a | 5.49±0.62a | 5.49±0.82a |
Table 2 The influence of He-Ne laser on the production rate of O2-.in wheat seedlings under drought stress (nmol·min-1·g-1FW)
PEG浓度 PEG content (%) | 激光处理时间Treatment time of laser (min) | PEG胁迫处理天数 Time of drought stress (d) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 | 12d | 15d | |||||
0 | 0 | 1.61±0.62 | 2.44±0.35 | 3.12±0.38 | 3.83±0.28 | 3.52±0.26 | |||||
5 | 0 | 3.22±0.54a | 3.08±0.23a | 4.50±0.10a | 4.68±0.09a | 4.06±0.80a | |||||
5 | 1 | 2.85±1.08a | 2.89±0.06a | 4.26±0.50a | 4.41±0.30a | 3.69±0.52a | |||||
5 | 3 | 1.04±0.13b | 2.61±0.31b | 2.64±0.60b | 3.65±0.80b | 3.02±0.14b | |||||
10 | 0 | 3.45±0.27a | 3.48±0.09a | 4.83±0.30a | 5.05±0.40a | 4.85±0.40a | |||||
10 | 1 | 3.27±0.95a | 3.23±0.09a | 4.28±0.15a | 4.89±0.08a | 4.61±0.58a | |||||
10 | 3 | 3.10±0.59a | 3.11±0.04a | 4.22±0.41a | 4.72±0.48a | 4.49±0.04a | |||||
15 | 0 | 3.48±1.49a | 4.21±0.21a | 4.68±0.53a | 5.62±0.34a | 5.55±0.48a | |||||
15 | 1 | 3.13±0.54a | 4.06±0.56a | 4.86±0.10a | 5.69±0.28a | 5.60±0.52a | |||||
15 | 3 | 3.29±0.82a | 4.05±0.06a | 4.71±0.72a | 5.49±0.62a | 5.49±0.82a |
PEG浓度 PEG content (%) | 激光处理时间Treatment time of laser (min) | PEG胁迫处理天数 Time of drought stress (d) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 | 9d | 12d | 15d | |
0 | 0 | 8.40±0.85 | 9.42±0.65 | 10.21±1.28 | 10.43±2.65 | 11.27±2.36 | ||
5 | 0 | 8.53±0.92b | 8.13±0.58b | 10.47±1.61b | 11.20±1.72b | 15.13±1.31b | ||
5 | 1 | 8.93±1.36b | 8.60±0.53b | 10.97±1.49b | 12.47±2.39b | 16.20±1.89a | ||
5 | 3 | 10.93±1.64a | 12.60±1.72a | 13.23±1.44a | 14.33±1.98a | 17.53±1.77a | ||
10 | 0 | 10.30±1.90a | 11.47±1.61a | 13.57±1.63a | 14.47±1.12a | 24.87±1.66a | ||
10 | 1 | 12.40±1.60a | 11.40±1.59a | 13.80±1.58a | 16.20±1.87a | 26.00±1.58a | ||
10 | 3 | 10.53±1.64a | 11.53±1.57a | 13.07±1.15a | 15.40±1.72a | 25.07±1.67a | ||
15 | 0 | 12.70±1.46a | 12.10±1.75a | 12.73±1.64a | 12.40±1.02a | 18.00±2.27a | ||
15 | 1 | 12.00±1.87a | 12.60±2.86a | 13.73±0.95a | 13.27±2.53a | 18.67±1.45a | ||
15 | 3 | 12.27±1.60a | 12.80±1.58a | 12.80±1.20a | 13.87±1.92a | 18.53±1.84a |
Table 3 The influence of He-Ne laser on POD activity in wheat seedlings under drought stress (U·mg-1protein)
PEG浓度 PEG content (%) | 激光处理时间Treatment time of laser (min) | PEG胁迫处理天数 Time of drought stress (d) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 | 9d | 12d | 15d | |
0 | 0 | 8.40±0.85 | 9.42±0.65 | 10.21±1.28 | 10.43±2.65 | 11.27±2.36 | ||
5 | 0 | 8.53±0.92b | 8.13±0.58b | 10.47±1.61b | 11.20±1.72b | 15.13±1.31b | ||
5 | 1 | 8.93±1.36b | 8.60±0.53b | 10.97±1.49b | 12.47±2.39b | 16.20±1.89a | ||
5 | 3 | 10.93±1.64a | 12.60±1.72a | 13.23±1.44a | 14.33±1.98a | 17.53±1.77a | ||
10 | 0 | 10.30±1.90a | 11.47±1.61a | 13.57±1.63a | 14.47±1.12a | 24.87±1.66a | ||
10 | 1 | 12.40±1.60a | 11.40±1.59a | 13.80±1.58a | 16.20±1.87a | 26.00±1.58a | ||
10 | 3 | 10.53±1.64a | 11.53±1.57a | 13.07±1.15a | 15.40±1.72a | 25.07±1.67a | ||
15 | 0 | 12.70±1.46a | 12.10±1.75a | 12.73±1.64a | 12.40±1.02a | 18.00±2.27a | ||
15 | 1 | 12.00±1.87a | 12.60±2.86a | 13.73±0.95a | 13.27±2.53a | 18.67±1.45a | ||
15 | 3 | 12.27±1.60a | 12.80±1.58a | 12.80±1.20a | 13.87±1.92a | 18.53±1.84a |
PEG浓度 PEG content (%) | 激光处理时间Treatment time of laser (min) | PEG胁迫处理天数 Time of drought stress (d) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 | ||
0 | 0 | 9.02±1.02 | 9.36±0.87 | 9.92±2.31 | 9.26±2.05 | 8.93±1.86 |
5 | 0 | 7.18±0.40b | 8.34±1.01b | 8.40±2.26b | 7.24±1.07b | 6.21±0.49b |
5 | 1 | 8.75±0.50ab | 9.42±1.07ab | 10.19±1.02ab | 7.83±1.04ab | 7.25±1.01ab |
5 | 3 | 10.02±1.27a | 10.39±2.11a | 10.50±2.01a | 9.19±0.53a | 8.49±1.14a |
10 | 0 | 7.84±1.02a | 8.14±1.69a | 8.82±1.01a | 8.54±0.67a | 7.68±1.01a |
10 | 1 | 8.77±1.01a | 8.90±1.03a | 10.04±1.01a | 8.50±1.25a | 7.83±0.68a |
10 | 3 | 8.57±1.07a | 9.54±1.01a | 10.16±0.58a | 8.92±1.15a | 8.43±0.78a |
15 | 0 | 8.05±1.01a | 9.51±+1.01a | 10.09±0.72a | 7.13±1.01a | 7.12±0.71a |
15 | 1 | 8.33±1.13a | 9.91±1.01a | 10.12±1.01a | 7.21±1.04a | 7.21±1.06a |
15 | 3 | 8.99±1.03a | 9.48±1.07a | 10.27±1.11a | 7.43±1.06a | 7.39±1.04a |
Table 4 The influence of He-Ne laser on AsA concentration in wheat seedlings under drought stress (μg·g-1FW )
PEG浓度 PEG content (%) | 激光处理时间Treatment time of laser (min) | PEG胁迫处理天数 Time of drought stress (d) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 | ||
0 | 0 | 9.02±1.02 | 9.36±0.87 | 9.92±2.31 | 9.26±2.05 | 8.93±1.86 |
5 | 0 | 7.18±0.40b | 8.34±1.01b | 8.40±2.26b | 7.24±1.07b | 6.21±0.49b |
5 | 1 | 8.75±0.50ab | 9.42±1.07ab | 10.19±1.02ab | 7.83±1.04ab | 7.25±1.01ab |
5 | 3 | 10.02±1.27a | 10.39±2.11a | 10.50±2.01a | 9.19±0.53a | 8.49±1.14a |
10 | 0 | 7.84±1.02a | 8.14±1.69a | 8.82±1.01a | 8.54±0.67a | 7.68±1.01a |
10 | 1 | 8.77±1.01a | 8.90±1.03a | 10.04±1.01a | 8.50±1.25a | 7.83±0.68a |
10 | 3 | 8.57±1.07a | 9.54±1.01a | 10.16±0.58a | 8.92±1.15a | 8.43±0.78a |
15 | 0 | 8.05±1.01a | 9.51±+1.01a | 10.09±0.72a | 7.13±1.01a | 7.12±0.71a |
15 | 1 | 8.33±1.13a | 9.91±1.01a | 10.12±1.01a | 7.21±1.04a | 7.21±1.06a |
15 | 3 | 8.99±1.03a | 9.48±1.07a | 10.27±1.11a | 7.43±1.06a | 7.39±1.04a |
PEG浓度 PEG content (%) | 激光处理时间Treatment time of laser (min) | PEG胁迫处理天数 Time of drought stress (d) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 | ||
0 | 0 | 2.17±0.16 | 2.68±0.36 | 2.78±0.28 | 2.18±0.19 | 2.34±.0.17 |
5 | 0 | 0.69±0.08a | 0.93±0.14a | 1.27±0.13a | 0.84±0.09a | 0.11±0.01a |
5 | 1 | 0.73±0.04a | 1.24±0.21a | 1.32±0.09a | 0.95±0.07a | 0.12±0.01a |
5 | 3 | 0.73±0.03a | 1.15±0.18a | 1.35±0.31a | 0.98±0.15a | 0.11±0.01a |
10 | 0 | 0.69±0.03a | 1.21±0.25a | 1.35±0.27a | 0.84±0.08a | 0.10±0.01a |
10 | 1 | 0.62±0.04a | 1.33±0.14a | 1.36±0.16a | 0.88±0.13a | 0.15±0.04a |
10 | 3 | 0.66±0.06a | 1.40±0.12a | 1.42±0.13a | 0.89±0.08a | 0.18±0.06a |
15 | 0 | 1.01±0.15b | 1.19±0.18b | 1.49±0.12b | 1.05±0.01b | 0.14±0.03a |
15 | 1 | 1.20±0.14b | 1.63±0.21a | 1.64±0.24ab | 1.21±0.06ab | 0.12±0.06a |
15 | 3 | 1.62±0.14a | 1.67±0.35a | 1.72±0.26a | 1.30±0.02a | 0.14±0.07a |
Table 5 The influence of He-Ne laser on GSH concentration in wheat seedlings under drought stress (μg·g-1FW )
PEG浓度 PEG content (%) | 激光处理时间Treatment time of laser (min) | PEG胁迫处理天数 Time of drought stress (d) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 | ||
0 | 0 | 2.17±0.16 | 2.68±0.36 | 2.78±0.28 | 2.18±0.19 | 2.34±.0.17 |
5 | 0 | 0.69±0.08a | 0.93±0.14a | 1.27±0.13a | 0.84±0.09a | 0.11±0.01a |
5 | 1 | 0.73±0.04a | 1.24±0.21a | 1.32±0.09a | 0.95±0.07a | 0.12±0.01a |
5 | 3 | 0.73±0.03a | 1.15±0.18a | 1.35±0.31a | 0.98±0.15a | 0.11±0.01a |
10 | 0 | 0.69±0.03a | 1.21±0.25a | 1.35±0.27a | 0.84±0.08a | 0.10±0.01a |
10 | 1 | 0.62±0.04a | 1.33±0.14a | 1.36±0.16a | 0.88±0.13a | 0.15±0.04a |
10 | 3 | 0.66±0.06a | 1.40±0.12a | 1.42±0.13a | 0.89±0.08a | 0.18±0.06a |
15 | 0 | 1.01±0.15b | 1.19±0.18b | 1.49±0.12b | 1.05±0.01b | 0.14±0.03a |
15 | 1 | 1.20±0.14b | 1.63±0.21a | 1.64±0.24ab | 1.21±0.06ab | 0.12±0.06a |
15 | 3 | 1.62±0.14a | 1.67±0.35a | 1.72±0.26a | 1.30±0.02a | 0.14±0.07a |
[1] | Cai SW (蔡素雯), Qi Z (齐智), Ma XL (马小来) (2000). Effect of He-Ne laser irradiation on soluble protein synthesis of corn seedlings. Chinese Journal of Lasers (中国激光), 27,284-288. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[2] | Han R (韩榕), Wang XL (王勋陵), Yue M (岳明) (2002). Influence of He-Ne laser irradiation on the damage and repair of wheat seedling by enhanced UV-B radiation. Chinese Journal of Lasers (中国激光), 29,859-863. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[3] | Lin ZF (林植芳), Li SS (李双顺), Lin GZ (林桂珠) (1984). Relationship between superoxide dismutase as well as lipid peroxidation and the senescence in rice leaves. Acta Botanica Sinica(植物学报), 26,605-615. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[4] |
Qi Z, Yue M, Han R (2002). The damage repair role of He-Ne laser in plant exposed to different intensities of ultraviolet-B irradiation. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 75,680-687.
DOI URL PMID |
[5] | Qi Zi, Yue M, Wang XL (2000). Laser pretreatment protects cells of broad bean from UV-B radiation damage. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 59,33-37. |
[6] | Wang AG (王爱国), Luo GH (罗广华) (1990). Quantitative relation between the reaction of hydroxylamine and superoxide anion radicals in plants. Plant Physiology Communications (植物生理学通讯), 6,55-57. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[7] | Yuan ZX (袁朝兴), Ding J (丁静) (1990). Effect of water stress on IAA, IAA-POD and POD activity in cotton leaves. Acta Phytophysiologia Sinica (植物生理学报), 16,37-42. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[8] | Zeng SX (曾韶西), Wang YR (王以柔) (1990). Effects of chilling stress on the activity of ascorbic acid peroxidase and glutathione content in cotyledons of cucumber seedlings. Acta Phytophysiologia Sinica (植物生理学报), 16,37-42. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[9] | Zhang ZS (张宗申), Li RQ (利容千), Wang JB (王建波) (2001). Effects of Ca 2+pretreatment on plasma lemma permeability, GSH and contents, and calcium distribution in pepper mesophyll cells under heat stress. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 25,230-234. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | CHEN Tu-Qiang, XU Gui-Qing, LIU Shen-Si, LI Yan. Hydraulic traits adjustments and nonstructural carbohydrate dynamics of Haloxylon ammodendron under drought stress [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(10): 1407-1421. |
[2] | ZHOU Jie, YANG Xiao-Dong, WANG Ya-Yun, LONG Yan-Xin, WANG Yan, LI Bo-Rui, SUN Qi-Xing, SUN Nan. Difference in adaptation strategy between Haloxylon ammodendron and Alhagi sparsifolia to drought [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(9): 1064-1076. |
[3] | LIU Li-Yan, FENG Jin-Xia, LIU Wen-Xin, WAN Xian-Chong. Effects of drought stress on photosynthesis, growth and root structure of transgenic PtPIP2;8 poplar 84K (Populus alba × P. glandulosa) [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2020, 44(6): 677-686. |
[4] | LUO Jin-Huan, TAN Zhao-Yuan, CHEN Bin, CHEN Guang-Wu, JIANG Kai, HEI Qi-Fang, ZHANG Hui. Key characteristics for facilitating Leucaena leucocephala to successfully invade pioneer communities of tropical rain forests [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2020, 44(12): 1215-1223. |
[5] | XU Li-Jiao, HAO Zhi-Peng, XIE Wei, LI Fang, CHEN Bao-Dong. Transmembrane H + and Ca 2+ fluxes through extraradical hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in response to drought stress [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2018, 42(7): 764-773. |
[6] | Xi WANG,Hong-Ling HU,Ting-Xing HU,Cheng-Hao ZHANG,Xin WANG,Dan LIU. Effects of drought stress on the osmotic adjustment and active oxygen metabolism of Phoebe zhennan seedlings and its alleviation by nitrogen application [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2018, 42(2): 240-251. |
[7] | Dan-Dan LUO, Chuan-Kuan WANG, Ying JIN. Plant water-regulation strategies: Isohydric versus anisohydric behavior [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2017, 41(9): 1020-1032. |
[8] | Rui GUO, Ji ZHOU, Fan YANG, Feng LI. Metabolic responses of wheat roots to alkaline stress [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2017, 41(6): 683-692. |
[9] | Jing-Xin XU, You-Fei ZHENG, Bo-Ru MAI, Hui ZHAO, Zhong-Fang CHU, Ji-Qing HUANG, Yue YUAN. Characteristics and partitioning of ozone dry deposition measured by eddy-covariance technology in a winter wheat field [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2017, 41(6): 670-682. |
[10] | GAO Lin, WANG Xiao-Fei, GU Xing-Fa, TIAN Qing-Jiu, JIAO Jun-Nan, WANG Pei-Yan, LI Dan. Exploring the influence of soil types underneath the canopy in winter wheat leaf area index remote estimating [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2017, 41(12): 1273-1288. |
[11] | Yu CEN, Mei-Zhen LIU. Effects of dew on eco-physiological traits and leaf structures of Leymus chinensis and Agropyron cristatum grown under drought stress [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2017, 41(11): 1199-1207. |
[12] | Cheng-Yan ZHENG, Ai-Xing DENG, Hojatollah LATIFMANESH, Zhen-Wei SONG, Jun ZHANG, Li WANG, Wei-Jian ZHANG. Warming impacts on the dry matter accumulation, and translocation and nitrogen uptake and utilization of winter wheat on the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2017, 41(10): 1060-1068. |
[13] | Rui GUO, Ji ZHOU, Fan YANG, Feng LI, Hao-Ru LI, Xu XIA, Qi LIU. Growth metabolism of wheat under drought stress at the jointing-booting stage [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2016, 40(12): 1319-1327. |
[14] | Qiu-Fang ZHANG, Chun-Ping LÜ, Zhao-Xian BEI, Jin-Sheng XIE, Mao-Kui LÜ, Wei-Sheng LIN, Yue-Min CHEN, Yu-Sheng YANG. Effects of simulated warming outdoor on lipid peroxidation and protective enzyme activities in the subtropical species Cunninghamia lanceolata [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2016, 40(12): 1230-1237. |
[15] | AN Dong-Sheng,CAO Juan,HUANG Xiao-Hua,ZHOU Juan,DOU Mei-An. Application of Lake-model based indices from chlorophyll fluorescence on sugarcane seedling drought resistance study [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2015, 39(4): 398-406. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn