Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2005, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 373-379.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2005.0049
• Original article • Previous Articles Next Articles
SUN Xiao-Yu1, LU Zhao-Hua1, YU Xing-Jun2, SANG Wei-Guo2,*()
Received:
2004-08-09
Accepted:
2005-01-05
Online:
2005-08-09
Published:
2005-05-30
Contact:
SANG Wei-Guo
SUN Xiao-Yu, LU Zhao-Hua, YU Xing-Jun, SANG Wei-Guo. AGE STRUCTURE DYNAMICS OF EUPATORIUM ADENOPHORUM POPULATIONS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR CONTROL[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2005, 29(3): 373-379.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.17521/cjpe.2005.0049
环境因子 Environmental factors | 路旁荒地 Roadside | 阔叶林 Broad-leaved forest | 阔叶林林缘 Margin of broad-leaved forest | 云南松林 Pinus yunnanensis forest |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 海拔 Altitude (m) | 1 837 | 2 175 | 2 057 | 2 208 |
2 坡向Slope aspect | 北N | 西北NW | 北N | 西南NS |
3 坡度Graduate (°) | 9 | 25 | 17 | 33 |
4 坡位Slope position | 下Lower | 中Middle | 中下Mid-Lower | 上Upper |
5 乔木层盖度Coverage of tree layer (%) | - | 70 | 60 | 50 |
6 土壤厚度Soil thickness (cm) | 57 | 72 | 67 | 50 |
7 土壤pH值Soil pH | 6.0 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 5.8 |
8 土壤水分含量Soil moisture content (%) | 47 | 58 | 50 | 35 |
9 种群平均密度Mean density (individual·10-2·m-2) | 5 133 | 863 | 2 864 | 5 108 |
10 样地数量No. of plots | 4 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
Table 1 The environmental factors of different Eupatorium adenophorum populations
环境因子 Environmental factors | 路旁荒地 Roadside | 阔叶林 Broad-leaved forest | 阔叶林林缘 Margin of broad-leaved forest | 云南松林 Pinus yunnanensis forest |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 海拔 Altitude (m) | 1 837 | 2 175 | 2 057 | 2 208 |
2 坡向Slope aspect | 北N | 西北NW | 北N | 西南NS |
3 坡度Graduate (°) | 9 | 25 | 17 | 33 |
4 坡位Slope position | 下Lower | 中Middle | 中下Mid-Lower | 上Upper |
5 乔木层盖度Coverage of tree layer (%) | - | 70 | 60 | 50 |
6 土壤厚度Soil thickness (cm) | 57 | 72 | 67 | 50 |
7 土壤pH值Soil pH | 6.0 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 5.8 |
8 土壤水分含量Soil moisture content (%) | 47 | 58 | 50 | 35 |
9 种群平均密度Mean density (individual·10-2·m-2) | 5 133 | 863 | 2 864 | 5 108 |
10 样地数量No. of plots | 4 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
Fig.1 The age structure of different Eupatorium adenophorum populations a. One-year-old Eupatorium adenophorum plants of different populations b. The populations of E. adenophorum in broad-leaved forest c. The population of E. adenophorum at the margin of broad-leaved forest d. The population of E. adenophorum in Pinus yunnanensis forest e. The population of E. adenophorum in roadside field f. The total populations Ⅰ. The total individuals of one-year-old E. adenophorum in broad-leaved forest Ⅱ. The total individuals of one-year-old E. adenophorum at the margin of broad-leaved forest Ⅲ. The total individuals of one-year-old E. adenophorum in Pinus yunnanensis forest Ⅳ. The total individuals of one-year-old E. adenophorum in roadside field
年龄 (X) Age | 存活数 (NX) Number of survival | 存活数标准化 (LX) Standard survival | LOGLX | 死亡数 (DX) Standard death at interval | 死亡率 (QX) Mortality rate | 生命期望 (EX) Expecting life |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 616 | 1 000 | 3.000 | 513 | 0.833 | 0.901 |
2 | 103 | 167.210 | 2.223 | 34 | 0.330 | 1.898 |
3 | 69 | 112.010 | 2.049 | 21 | 0.304 | 1.587 |
4 | 48 | 77.920 | 1.892 | 31 | 0.646 | 1.063 |
5 | 17 | 27.590 | 1.441 | 14 | 0.824 | 1.088 |
6 | 3 | 4.870 | 0.688 | - | - | 2.833 |
7 | 4 | 6.490 | 0.812 | 1 | 0.250 | 1.250 |
8 | 3 | 4.870 | 0.688 | 3 | 1.000 | 0.500 |
Table 2 The life table of Eupatorium adenophorum population in broad-leaved forest
年龄 (X) Age | 存活数 (NX) Number of survival | 存活数标准化 (LX) Standard survival | LOGLX | 死亡数 (DX) Standard death at interval | 死亡率 (QX) Mortality rate | 生命期望 (EX) Expecting life |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 616 | 1 000 | 3.000 | 513 | 0.833 | 0.901 |
2 | 103 | 167.210 | 2.223 | 34 | 0.330 | 1.898 |
3 | 69 | 112.010 | 2.049 | 21 | 0.304 | 1.587 |
4 | 48 | 77.920 | 1.892 | 31 | 0.646 | 1.063 |
5 | 17 | 27.590 | 1.441 | 14 | 0.824 | 1.088 |
6 | 3 | 4.870 | 0.688 | - | - | 2.833 |
7 | 4 | 6.490 | 0.812 | 1 | 0.250 | 1.250 |
8 | 3 | 4.870 | 0.688 | 3 | 1.000 | 0.500 |
年龄 (X) Age | 存活数 (NX) Number of survival | 存活数标准化 (LX) Standard survival | LOGLX | 死亡数 (DX) Standard death at interval | 死亡率 (QX) Mortality rate | 生命期望 (EX) Expecting life |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 764 | 1 000.000 | 3.000 | 2 758 | 0.998 | 0.547 |
2 | 6 | 2.171 | 0.337 | 0 | 0 | 21.170 |
3 | 6 | 2.171 | 0.337 | - | - | 20.170 |
4 | 21 | 7.598 | 0.881 | 0 | 0 | 5.119 |
5 | 21 | 7.598 | 0.881 | - | - | 4.119 |
6 | 23 | 8.321 | 0.92 | - | - | 2.804 |
7 | 24 | 8.683 | 0.939 | 2 | 0.083 | 1.708 |
8 | 22 | 7.960 | 0.901 | 15 | 0.682 | 0.818 |
9 | 7 | 2.533 | 0.404 | 7 | 1.000 | 0.500 |
Table 3 The life table of Eupatorium adenophorum population in the margin of broad-leaved forest
年龄 (X) Age | 存活数 (NX) Number of survival | 存活数标准化 (LX) Standard survival | LOGLX | 死亡数 (DX) Standard death at interval | 死亡率 (QX) Mortality rate | 生命期望 (EX) Expecting life |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 764 | 1 000.000 | 3.000 | 2 758 | 0.998 | 0.547 |
2 | 6 | 2.171 | 0.337 | 0 | 0 | 21.170 |
3 | 6 | 2.171 | 0.337 | - | - | 20.170 |
4 | 21 | 7.598 | 0.881 | 0 | 0 | 5.119 |
5 | 21 | 7.598 | 0.881 | - | - | 4.119 |
6 | 23 | 8.321 | 0.92 | - | - | 2.804 |
7 | 24 | 8.683 | 0.939 | 2 | 0.083 | 1.708 |
8 | 22 | 7.960 | 0.901 | 15 | 0.682 | 0.818 |
9 | 7 | 2.533 | 0.404 | 7 | 1.000 | 0.500 |
年龄 (X) Age | 存活数 (NX) Number of survival | 存活数标准化 (LX) Standard survival | LOGLX | 死亡数 (DX) Standard death at interval | 死亡率 (QX) Mortality rate | 生命期望 (EX) Expecting life |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 796 | 1 000.000 | 3.000 | 4 706 | 0.981 | 0.565 |
2 | 90 | 18.766 | 1.273 | - | - | 2.967 |
3 | 99 | 20.642 | 1.315 | 32 | 0.323 | 1.742 |
4 | 67 | 13.970 | 1.145 | 27 | 0.403 | 1.336 |
5 | 40 | 8.340 | 0.921 | 29 | 0.725 | 0.900 |
6 | 11 | 2.294 | 0.361 | 6 | 0.546 | 0.955 |
7 | 5 | 1.043 | 0.018 | 5 | 1.000 | 438.000 |
Table 4 The life table of Eupatorium adenophorum population in Pinus yunnanensis forest
年龄 (X) Age | 存活数 (NX) Number of survival | 存活数标准化 (LX) Standard survival | LOGLX | 死亡数 (DX) Standard death at interval | 死亡率 (QX) Mortality rate | 生命期望 (EX) Expecting life |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 796 | 1 000.000 | 3.000 | 4 706 | 0.981 | 0.565 |
2 | 90 | 18.766 | 1.273 | - | - | 2.967 |
3 | 99 | 20.642 | 1.315 | 32 | 0.323 | 1.742 |
4 | 67 | 13.970 | 1.145 | 27 | 0.403 | 1.336 |
5 | 40 | 8.340 | 0.921 | 29 | 0.725 | 0.900 |
6 | 11 | 2.294 | 0.361 | 6 | 0.546 | 0.955 |
7 | 5 | 1.043 | 0.018 | 5 | 1.000 | 438.000 |
年龄 (X) Age | 存活数 (NX) Number of survival | 存活数标准化 (LX) Standard survival | LOGLX | 死亡数 (DX) Standard death at interval | 死亡率 (QX) Mortality rate | 生命期望 (EX) Expecting life |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 355 | 1 000.000 | 3.000 | 4 335 | 0.995 | 0.575 |
2 | 20 | 4.592 | 0.662 | - | - | 15.900 |
3 | 30 | 6.889 | 0.838 | - | - | 9.767 |
4 | 32 | 7.348 | 0.866 | - | - | 8.188 |
5 | 49 | 11.251 | 1.051 | 3 | 0.061 | 4.520 |
6 | 46 | 10.563 | 1.024 | 5 | 0.109 | 3.783 |
7 | 41 | 9.415 | 0.974 | - | - | 3.183 |
8 | 42 | 9.644 | 0.984 | 17 | 0.405 | 2.119 |
9 | 25 | 5.741 | 0.759 | 9 | 0.360 | 2.220 |
10 | 16 | 3.674 | 0.565 | 5 | 0.313 | 2.188 |
11 | 11 | 2.526 | 0.402 | 5 | 0.455 | 1.955 |
12 | 6 | 1.378 | 0.139 | 1 | 0.167 | 2.167 |
13 | 5 | 1.148 | 0.060 | 1 | 0.200 | 1.500 |
14 | 4 | 0.919 | -0.040 | 3 | 0.750 | 0.750 |
15 | 1 | 0.230 | -0.640 | 1 | 1.000 | 0.500 |
Table 5 The life table of Eupatorium adenophorum population in roadside field
年龄 (X) Age | 存活数 (NX) Number of survival | 存活数标准化 (LX) Standard survival | LOGLX | 死亡数 (DX) Standard death at interval | 死亡率 (QX) Mortality rate | 生命期望 (EX) Expecting life |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 355 | 1 000.000 | 3.000 | 4 335 | 0.995 | 0.575 |
2 | 20 | 4.592 | 0.662 | - | - | 15.900 |
3 | 30 | 6.889 | 0.838 | - | - | 9.767 |
4 | 32 | 7.348 | 0.866 | - | - | 8.188 |
5 | 49 | 11.251 | 1.051 | 3 | 0.061 | 4.520 |
6 | 46 | 10.563 | 1.024 | 5 | 0.109 | 3.783 |
7 | 41 | 9.415 | 0.974 | - | - | 3.183 |
8 | 42 | 9.644 | 0.984 | 17 | 0.405 | 2.119 |
9 | 25 | 5.741 | 0.759 | 9 | 0.360 | 2.220 |
10 | 16 | 3.674 | 0.565 | 5 | 0.313 | 2.188 |
11 | 11 | 2.526 | 0.402 | 5 | 0.455 | 1.955 |
12 | 6 | 1.378 | 0.139 | 1 | 0.167 | 2.167 |
13 | 5 | 1.148 | 0.060 | 1 | 0.200 | 1.500 |
14 | 4 | 0.919 | -0.040 | 3 | 0.750 | 0.750 |
15 | 1 | 0.230 | -0.640 | 1 | 1.000 | 0.500 |
X | NX | 未来3年的株数 (M3) No. of plants after three years | 未来5年的株数 (M5) No. of plants after five years |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 616 | ||
2 | 103 | ||
3 | 69 | 262.67 | |
4 | 48 | 73.33 | |
5 | 17 | 44.67 | 170.60 |
6 | 3 | 22.67 | 48.00 |
7 | 4 | 8.00 | 28.20 |
8 | 3 | 3.33 | 25.00 |
Table 6 Time sequence prediction of quantitative dynamics of Eupatorium adenophorum in broad-leaved forest
X | NX | 未来3年的株数 (M3) No. of plants after three years | 未来5年的株数 (M5) No. of plants after five years |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 616 | ||
2 | 103 | ||
3 | 69 | 262.67 | |
4 | 48 | 73.33 | |
5 | 17 | 44.67 | 170.60 |
6 | 3 | 22.67 | 48.00 |
7 | 4 | 8.00 | 28.20 |
8 | 3 | 3.33 | 25.00 |
X | NX | 未来3年的株数 (M3) No. of plants after three years | 未来5年的株数 (M5) No. of plants after five years |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 764 | ||
2 | 6 | ||
3 | 6 | 925.33 | |
4 | 21 | 11.00 | |
5 | 21 | 16.00 | 563.60 |
6 | 23 | 21.67 | 15.40 |
7 | 24 | 22.67 | 19.00 |
8 | 22 | 23.00 | 22.20 |
9 | 7 | 17.67 | 19.40 |
Table 7 Time sequence prediction of quantitative dynamics of Eupatorium adenophorum in the margin of broad-leaved forest
X | NX | 未来3年的株数 (M3) No. of plants after three years | 未来5年的株数 (M5) No. of plants after five years |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 764 | ||
2 | 6 | ||
3 | 6 | 925.33 | |
4 | 21 | 11.00 | |
5 | 21 | 16.00 | 563.60 |
6 | 23 | 21.67 | 15.40 |
7 | 24 | 22.67 | 19.00 |
8 | 22 | 23.00 | 22.20 |
9 | 7 | 17.67 | 19.40 |
X | NX | 未来3年的株数 (M3) No. of plants after three years | 未来5年的株数 (M5) No. of plants after five years |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 796 | ||
2 | 90 | ||
3 | 99 | 1 661.67 | |
4 | 67 | 85.33 | |
5 | 40 | 68.67 | 1 018.40 |
6 | 11 | 39.33 | 61.40 |
7 | 5 | 18.67 | 44.40 |
Table 8 Time sequence prediction of quantitative dynamics of Eupatorium adenophorum in Pinus yunnanensis forest
X | NX | 未来3年的株数 (M3) No. of plants after three years | 未来5年的株数 (M5) No. of plants after five years |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 796 | ||
2 | 90 | ||
3 | 99 | 1 661.67 | |
4 | 67 | 85.33 | |
5 | 40 | 68.67 | 1 018.40 |
6 | 11 | 39.33 | 61.40 |
7 | 5 | 18.67 | 44.40 |
X | NX | 未来3年的株数 (M3) No. of plants after three years | 未来5年的株数 (M5) No. of plants after five years |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 355 | ||
2 | 20 | ||
3 | 30 | 1 468.33 | |
4 | 32 | 27.33 | |
5 | 49 | 37.00 | 897.20 |
6 | 46 | 42.33 | 35.40 |
7 | 41 | 45.33 | 39.60 |
8 | 42 | 43.00 | 42.00 |
9 | 25 | 36.00 | 40.60 |
10 | 16 | 27.67 | 34.00 |
11 | 11 | 17.33 | 27.00 |
12 | 6 | 11.00 | 20.00 |
13 | 5 | 7.33 | 12.60 |
14 | 4 | 5.00 | 8.40 |
15 | 1 | 3.33 | 5.40 |
Table 9 Time sequence prediction of quantitative dynamics of Eupatorium adenophorum in roadside field
X | NX | 未来3年的株数 (M3) No. of plants after three years | 未来5年的株数 (M5) No. of plants after five years |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 4 355 | ||
2 | 20 | ||
3 | 30 | 1 468.33 | |
4 | 32 | 27.33 | |
5 | 49 | 37.00 | 897.20 |
6 | 46 | 42.33 | 35.40 |
7 | 41 | 45.33 | 39.60 |
8 | 42 | 43.00 | 42.00 |
9 | 25 | 36.00 | 40.60 |
10 | 16 | 27.67 | 34.00 |
11 | 11 | 17.33 | 27.00 |
12 | 6 | 11.00 | 20.00 |
13 | 5 | 7.33 | 12.60 |
14 | 4 | 5.00 | 8.40 |
15 | 1 | 3.33 | 5.40 |
[1] | Elton CS (1958). TheEcologyofInvasionsbyAnimalsandPlants.Methuen, London, 181. |
[2] | Li B (李博), Yang C (杨持), Lin P (林鹏) (1999). Ecology (生态学). HigherEducationPress, Beijing, 43.(inChinese). |
[3] | Li ZY (李振宇), Xie Y (解焱) (2002). InvasiveAlienSpeciesinChina (中国外来入侵种).ChinaForestryPublishingHouse, Beijing,163. (inChinese). |
[4] | Liu LH (刘伦辉), Liu WY (刘文耀), Zheng Z (郑征), Jing GF (荆桂芬) (1989). ThecharacteristicresearchofautecologyecologyofPamakani (Eupatoriumadenophorum). ActaEcologi calSinica (生态学报), 5,1-6. (inChinesewithEnglishab stract). |
[5] | Lodge DM (1993a). Biologicalinvasions:lessonsforecology. TrendsinEcology&Evolution, 8,133-137. |
[6] | Lodge DM (1993b). Speciesinvasionsanddeletions:communityeffectsandresponsestoclimateandhabitatchange.In:KarievaPM, KingsolverJG, HueyRBeds. BioticInteractionsandGlobalChange.SinauerAssociates, Sumderland, MA,367-387. |
[7] | Mooney HA, Hobbs RJ (2000). InvasiveSpeciesinaChangingWorld. IslandPublishingHouse, Washington, DC, 457. |
[8] | Oelrichs PB, Seawright AA, MacLeod JJK, Ng JC (1998). ToxicPlantsandOtherNaturalToxicants. CABInternational, Walling ford, UK, 271. |
[9] | ParkerI M, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Goodell K, Wonham M (1999). Impact:towardaframeworkforunderstandingtheeco logicaleffectsofinvaders. BiologicalInvasions, 1,3-19. |
[10] | Patrabansh S, Madan M (1997). Studiesoncultivation, biologicalefficiencyandchemicalanalysisofPleurotussajor-caju (FR). SINGERondifferentbio-wastes.ActaBiotechnologica, 17,107-122. |
[11] |
Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J (2000). Globalspreadofmicroorganismsbyships. Nature, 408,49-50.
DOI URL |
[12] | Simberloff D (1996). ImpactsofintroducedspeciesintheUnitedStates. Consequences, 2,13-222. |
[13] | Stein B, Kutner LS, Adams JS (2000). PreciousHeritage:theSta tusofBiodiversityintheUnitedStates. OxfordUniversityPress, London, 300. |
[14] | Vitousek PM, Antonio CMD, Loope LL, Westbrooks R (1996). Biologicalinvasionsasglobalenvironmentalchange. AmericanScientist, 84,468-478. |
[15] | Vitousek PM, Walker LR (1989). BiologicalinvasionbyMyricafayainHawaii:plantdemography, nitrogenfixation, ecosystemeffects. EcologicalMonographs, 59,247-265. |
[16] | Williamson M (1996). BiologicalInvasions.Chapman&Hall, NewYork, 244. |
[17] |
Wilcove DS, Rothstein D, Dubow J, Phillips A, Losos E (1998). QuantifyingthreatstoimperiledspeciesintheUnitedStates. BioScience, 48,607-615.
DOI URL |
[18] | Zhang WH (张文辉) (1998). StudyonthePopulationEcologyofAdenophorapotanini (裂叶沙参种群生态学研究). ThePublishingHouseofNortheastForestryUniversity, Harbin. (inChi nese). |
[1] | WANG Yan-Ling, ZHAO Li-Jun, ZHU Li-Qiong, MO Ruo-Guo, LIN Ting, ZHAO Xiao-Yu. Seedling quantitative characteristics and dynamics of Syzygium hancei populations in Guangxi, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(9): 1278-1286. |
[2] | GUAN Yue, WANG Yan-Xin, CHU Jia-Yao, FENG Lin-Jiao, SONG Xiao-Meng, ZHOU Long. Age structure and dynamic analysis of Amygdalus ledebouriana population in Xinjiang, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(7): 967-977. |
[3] | HE Chun-Mei, LI Yu-Shan, YIN Qiu-Long, JIA Shi-Hong, HAO Zhan-Qing. Diameter structure and quantitative characteristics of dominant tree species in warm temperate deciduous broadleaf forest plot in Huangguan of Qinling Mountains, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(12): 1658-1667. |
[4] | LIN Chun-Hui, GU Hui-Yi, YE Qin-Liang, ZHANG Zhi-Jian, ZHONG Zhi-Ming, YI Qi-Fei. Characteristics of population structure and dynamics in endangered Camellia granthamiana [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(12): 1684-1692. |
[5] | ZHANG Jin-Feng, GE Shu-Sen, LIANG Jin-Hua, LI Jun-Qing. Population age structure and dynamics of Pinus koraiensis in a broadleaved Korean pine forest in Changbai Mountain, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(6): 667-677. |
[6] | LU Jing, MA Zong-Qi, GAO Peng-Fei, FAN Bao-Li, SUN Kun. Changes in the Hippophae tibetana population structure and dynamics, a pioneer species of succession, to altitudinal gradients in the Qilian Mountains, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(5): 569-579. |
[7] | WEI Xue-Ying, YE Yu-Shi, LIN Xi-Po, CUI Yu-Wen, ZENG Fei-Yan, WANG Fa-Guo. Population status and conservation of an extremely small population species Euryodendron excelsum [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2020, 44(12): 1236-1246. |
[8] | Li-Long WANG, Liang WANG, Li-Fang ZHANG, Yu-Yang LIU, Shi-Jian XU. Structure and dynamic characteristics of Gymnocarpos przewalskii in different habitats [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2015, 39(10): 980-989. |
[9] | ZHANG Liang, WANG Xiao-An, LIU Peng, WANG Xian, DENG Mei-Jiao, ZHU Yun-Yun. Life table and survival analysis of Loranthus tanakae population in Mount Ziwuling [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2014, 38(7): 687-693. |
[10] | SU Yuan, JIAO Ju-Ying, WANG Zhi-Jie. Characteristics of seedling survival in habitats of hill and gully slopes in hill-gully Loess Plateau region of northern Shaanxi [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2014, 38(7): 694-709. |
[11] | XIA Yang-Jie, TANG Jian-Qiang, ZHANG Guang-Fu, HUANG Chao, MENG Feng-Qun, SUN Shu-Cun. First and second sets of shoots in five evergreen woody species from Tiantong National Forest Park of Zhejiang, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2013, 37(3): 220-229. |
[12] | SHENG Da-Yong, ZHUANG Xue-Ying, XU Han, LI Yi-De, HU Yue-Hua, SHI Lei-Lei, LUO Tu-Shou, CHEN De-Xiang, LIN Ming-Xian. Community structure of endemic woody plants in tropical montane rainforest of Jianfengling, Hainan Island, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2012, 36(9): 935-947. |
[13] | WANG Shuo, GAO Xian-Ming, WANG Jin-Fang, DANG Wei-Guang. CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL SEED BANKS OF CROFTON WEED AND THEIR EFFECTS ON SEEDLINGS [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2009, 33(2): 380-386. |
[14] | ZHANG Zhi-Xiang, LIU Peng, CAI Miao-Zhen, KANG Hua-Jing, LIAO Cheng-Chuan, LIU Chun-Sheng, LOU Zhong-Hua. POPULATION QUANTITATIVE CHARACTERISTICS AND DYNAMICS OF RARE AND ENDANGERED TSUGA TCHEKIANGENSIS IN JIULONGSHAN NATURE RESERVE OF CHINA [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2008, 32(5): 1146-1156. |
[15] | HE Ya-Ping, FEI Shi-Min, JIANG Jun-Ming, CHEN Xiu-Ming, ZHANG Xu-Dong, HE Fei. INFLUENCES OF SUBSTITUTING SIZE VARIABLES FOR AGE ON POPULATION SURVIVAL ANALYSIS: A CASE STUDY OF PINUS TABULAEFORMIS AND P. ARMANDII IN QINLING MOUNTAIN, CHINA [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2008, 32(2): 448-455. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn