Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2014, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (12): 1356-1363.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00130 cstr: 32100.14.SP.J.1258.2014.00130
Previous Articles Next Articles
KANG Hua-Jing1,2,3,4, TAO Yue-Liang5, QUAN Wei4, WANG Wei4, OUYANG Zhu2,3,4,*(
)
Received:2014-03-21
Accepted:2014-05-10
Online:2014-03-21
Published:2015-04-16
Contact:
OUYANG Zhu
KANG Hua-Jing, TAO Yue-Liang, QUAN Wei, WANG Wei, OUYANG Zhu. Fitting mitochondrial respiration rates under light by photosynthetic CO2 response models[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2014, 38(12): 1356-1363.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00130
Fig. 1 Apparent photorespiration rate (Rpa) in response to CO2 concentration (Ca) at different photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) in flag leaves of wheat (mean ± SD).
Fig. 2 Recovery (Re-i) or inhibition (Ii) of photorespiratory CO2 in response to CO2 concentration (Ca) at different photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) (mean ± SD).
| PAR (μmol·m-2·s-1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 000 | 1 500 | 1 000 | 500 | |
| 光下呼吸速率 Pn0-21% | 6.843 ± 0.341a | 6.343 ± 0.762a | 6.536 ± 0.408a | 5.729 ± 0.499a |
| 光下暗呼吸速率 Pn0-2% | 1.934 ± 0.190c | 2.064 ± 0.091c | 2.164 ± 0.112c | 2.539 ± 0.285c |
| 表观光呼吸 Rpa0 | 5.035 ± 0.194b | 4.222 ± 0.832b | 4.330 ± 0.394b | 3.263 ± 0.544b |
Table 1 Measured values of photosynthetic rate in flag leaves of wheat at different photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) when CO2 concentration was 0 (μmol CO2·m-2·s-1) (mean ± SD)
| PAR (μmol·m-2·s-1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 000 | 1 500 | 1 000 | 500 | |
| 光下呼吸速率 Pn0-21% | 6.843 ± 0.341a | 6.343 ± 0.762a | 6.536 ± 0.408a | 5.729 ± 0.499a |
| 光下暗呼吸速率 Pn0-2% | 1.934 ± 0.190c | 2.064 ± 0.091c | 2.164 ± 0.112c | 2.539 ± 0.285c |
| 表观光呼吸 Rpa0 | 5.035 ± 0.194b | 4.222 ± 0.832b | 4.330 ± 0.394b | 3.263 ± 0.544b |
| PAR (μmol·m-2·s-1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 000 | 1 500 | 1 000 | 500 | ||
| A-Ci | A | 21.667 ± 0.577*# | 21.857 ± 0.378*# | 21.750 ± 0.500*# | 20.850 ± 1.226*# |
| B | 17.924 ± 1.250*# | 16.947 ± 0.908*# | 15.754 ± 1.200*# | 12.780 ± 0.905*# | |
| C | 14.809 ± 0.279*# | 13.745 ± 1.117*# | 13.412 ± 0.744*# | 11.655 ± 1.154*# | |
| A-Ca | A | 21.667 ± 0.577*# | 21.857 ± 0.378*# | 21.750 ± 0.500*# | 20.850 ± 1.226*# |
| B | 8.745 ± 1.340*# | 8.335 ± 0.695*# | 8.769 ± 0.931*# | 7.245 ± 0.589*# | |
| C | 7.743 ± 0.556*# | 6.907 ± 0.528* | 7.579 ± 0.570*# | 6.491 ± 0.616*# | |
Table 2 Fitted values of mitochondrial respiration in flag leaves of wheat under light at different photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and 21% O2 (mean ± SD)
| PAR (μmol·m-2·s-1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 000 | 1 500 | 1 000 | 500 | ||
| A-Ci | A | 21.667 ± 0.577*# | 21.857 ± 0.378*# | 21.750 ± 0.500*# | 20.850 ± 1.226*# |
| B | 17.924 ± 1.250*# | 16.947 ± 0.908*# | 15.754 ± 1.200*# | 12.780 ± 0.905*# | |
| C | 14.809 ± 0.279*# | 13.745 ± 1.117*# | 13.412 ± 0.744*# | 11.655 ± 1.154*# | |
| A-Ca | A | 21.667 ± 0.577*# | 21.857 ± 0.378*# | 21.750 ± 0.500*# | 20.850 ± 1.226*# |
| B | 8.745 ± 1.340*# | 8.335 ± 0.695*# | 8.769 ± 0.931*# | 7.245 ± 0.589*# | |
| C | 7.743 ± 0.556*# | 6.907 ± 0.528* | 7.579 ± 0.570*# | 6.491 ± 0.616*# | |
| PAR (μmol·m-2·s-1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 000 | 1 500 | 1 000 | 500 | ||
| A-Ci | A | 12.067 ± 0.808* | 12.286 ± 0.445* | 12.400 ± 0.783* | 11.350 ± 0.823* |
| B | 8.293 ± 1.500* | 9.245 ± 1.093* | 9.320 ± 0.843* | 9.416 ± 1.475* | |
| C | 6.099 ± 0.730* | 6.507 ± 0.913* | 6.609 ± 0.515* | 7.264 ± 0.561* | |
| A-Ca | A | 21.667 ± 0.577* | 21.857 ± 0.378* | 21.750 ± 0.500* | 20.850 ± 1.226* |
| B | 4.520 ± 1.118* | 5.022 ± 1.306* | 5.345 ± 0.828* | 4.919 ± 0.244* | |
| C | 2.766 ± 0.564* | 3.323 ± 0.977* | 3.326 ± 0.554* | 3.798 ± 0.251* | |
Table 3 Fitted values of mitochondrial respiration in flag leaves of wheat under light at different photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and 2% O2 (mean ± SD)
| PAR (μmol·m-2·s-1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 000 | 1 500 | 1 000 | 500 | ||
| A-Ci | A | 12.067 ± 0.808* | 12.286 ± 0.445* | 12.400 ± 0.783* | 11.350 ± 0.823* |
| B | 8.293 ± 1.500* | 9.245 ± 1.093* | 9.320 ± 0.843* | 9.416 ± 1.475* | |
| C | 6.099 ± 0.730* | 6.507 ± 0.913* | 6.609 ± 0.515* | 7.264 ± 0.561* | |
| A-Ca | A | 21.667 ± 0.577* | 21.857 ± 0.378* | 21.750 ± 0.500* | 20.850 ± 1.226* |
| B | 4.520 ± 1.118* | 5.022 ± 1.306* | 5.345 ± 0.828* | 4.919 ± 0.244* | |
| C | 2.766 ± 0.564* | 3.323 ± 0.977* | 3.326 ± 0.554* | 3.798 ± 0.251* | |
| 1 | Bernacchi CJ, Singsaas EL, Pimentel C, Portis AR, Long SP (2001). Improved temperature response functions for models of Rubisco-limited photosynthesis. Plant, Cell & Environment, 24, 253-259. |
| 2 | Berry JA, Downton WJ (1982). Environmental regulation of photosynthesis. In: Govindjee ed. Photosynthesis. Academic Press, New York. |
| 3 | Cai SQ, Xu DQ (2000). Relationship between the CO2 compensation point and photorespiration in soybean leaves. Acta Phytophysiol Sinica, 26, 545-550.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [蔡时青, 许大全 (2000). 大豆叶片CO2补偿点和光呼吸的关系. 植物生理学报, 26, 545-550.] | |
| 4 | Ethier GJ, Livingston NJ (2004). On the need to incorporate sensitivity to CO2 transfer conductance into the Farquhar- von Caemmerer-Berry leaf photosynthesis model. Plant, Cell & Environment, 27, 137-153. |
| 5 | Farquhar GD, Caemmerers S, Berry JA (1980). A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta, 149, 78-90. |
| 6 | Guan XQ, Zhao SJ, Li DQ, Zhao XJ (2003). Photorespiration of C3 plant and its physiological function. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 23, 1849-1854.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [管雪强, 赵世杰, 李德全, 赵新节 (2003). C3植物光呼吸及其生理功能. 西北植物学报,23, 1849-1854.] | |
| 7 |
Harley PC, Sharkey TD (1991). An improved model of C3 photosynthesis at high CO2: reversed O2 sensitivity explained by lack of glycerate reentry into the chloroplast. Photosynthesis Research, 27, 169-178.
DOI URL PMID |
| 8 | Harley PC, Thomas RB, Reynolds JF, Strain BR (1992). Modelling photosynthesis of cotton grown in elevated CO2 . Plant,Cell & Environment, 15, 271-282. |
| 9 | Kang HJ, Tao YL, Quan W, Ouyang Z (2013). Response of photorespiration of wheat flag leaf to light intensities and CO2 concentrations. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 33, 1252-1257.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [康华靖, 陶月良, 权伟, 王伟, 欧阳竹 (2013). 小麦旗叶光呼吸对光强和CO2浓度的响应. 麦类作物学报,33, 1252-1257.] | |
| 10 |
Long SP, Bernacchi CJ (2003). Gas exchange measurements, what can they tell us about the underlying limitations to photosynthesis? Procedures and sources of error. Journal of Experimental Botany, 54, 2393-2401.
DOI URL PMID |
| 11 | Loreto F, Delfine S, Di-marco G (1999). Estimation of photorespiratory carbon dioxide recycling during photosynthesis. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 26, 733-736. |
| 12 | Loreto F, Velikova VB, Marco GDA (2001). Respiration in the light measured by 12CO2 emission in 13CO2 atmosphere in maize leaves. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 28, 1103-1108. |
| 13 | Peng CL, Lin ZF, Sun ZJ, Lin GZ, Chen YZ (1998). Response of rice photosynthesis to CO2 enrichment. Acta Photophysiologica Sinica, 24, 272-278.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [彭长连, 林植芳, 孙梓健, 林桂珠, 陈贻竹 (1998). 水稻光合作用对加富CO2的响应. 植物生理学报, 24, 272-278.] | |
| 14 |
von Caemmerer S, Farquhar GD (1981). Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta, 153, 376-387.
URL PMID |
| 15 | Ye ZP (2010). A review on modeling of responses of photosynthesis to light and CO2. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 34, 727-740.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [叶子飘 (2010). 光合作用对光和CO2响应模型的研究进展. 植物生态学报, 34, 727-740.] | |
| 16 | Ye ZP, Yu Q (2009). A comparison of response curves of winter wheat photosynthesis to flag leaf intercellular and air CO2 concentrations. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 28, 2233-2238.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [叶子飘, 于强 (2009). 光合作用对胞间和大气CO2响应曲线的比较. 生态学杂志, 28, 2233-2238.] | |
| 17 |
Yin XY, Sun ZP, Struik PC, Gu JF (2011). Evaluating a new method to estimate the rate of leaf respiration in the light by analysis of combined gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62, 3489-3499.
DOI URL PMID |
| [1] | SU Chen-Fei, TIAN Wei, ZHANG Nan, TANG Long, ZHAO Yu-Wei, WANG Yao. Multi-factor photosynthetic rate prediction model by fusion of photosynthetic response model and theory-guided neural network [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2026, 50(1): 173-187. |
| [2] | LI Shao-Wei, HE Yong-Tao, SUN Wei, DAI Er-Fu. Dataset of crop harvest traits and yield at long-term observation farmlands in Lhasa River Valley from 2016 to 2020 [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2025, 49(8): 1321-1328. |
| [3] | ZHU Xi, HE Zhi-Bin, DU Ming-Wu, ZHAO Li-Wen, WU Dan-Dan. Dataset of crop harvest traits and yields from long-term observation plots of oasis farmland ecosystems in the middle part of Hexi Corridor from 2004 to 2010 [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2025, 49(8): 1312-1320. |
| [4] | CHEN Wen-Yi, WANG Zhi-Yong, ZHOU Meng-Yan, MA Wen-Jun, WANG Jun-Hui, LUO Zhi-Bin, ZHOU Jing. Biomass allocation and allometric growth model of young Catalpa bungei [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2025, 49(2): 356-366. |
| [5] | ZHAO Meng-Yang, ZHUANG Hao-Ran, XU De-Hao, MA Guo-Rong, MA Yong-Cheng, FENG Ke-Peng. Hydrogen and oxygen stable isotope characteristics of maize fields in arid and semi-arid oasis irrigation areas with SPAC system: variability traits and influencing factors [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2025, 49(2): 256-267. |
| [6] | HAN Yu-Qing, XIONG Wei, WU Bo, LU Qi, YANG Wen-Bin, LIU Ya-Li, ZHANG Jing-Bo, XIN Zhi-Ming, MA Ying-Bin, LIAN Hong-Lin, WANG Si-Han. Responses of stem sap flow of Haloxylon ammodendron to rainfall pulses in Ulan Buh Desert [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(9): 1172-1179. |
| [7] | LI Bei-Bei, ZHANG Ming-Jun, CHE Cun-Wei, LIU Ze-Chen, ZHONG Xiao-Fei, ZHANG Yuan-Yuan, ZHANG Yu. Water utilization strategy of Ziziphus jujuba under different sand cover thicknesses based on stable isotope tracing [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(9): 1202-1212. |
| [8] | FU Zhao-Qi, HU Xu, TIAN Qin-Rui, GE Yan-Ling, ZHOU Hong-Juan, WU Xiao-Yun, CHEN Li-Xin. Nocturnal sap flow characteristics of two typical forest tree species and responses to environmental factors in the loess region of West Shanxi, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(9): 1128-1142. |
| [9] | JIANG Kang-Wei, ZHANG Qing-Qing, WANG Ya-Fei, LI Hong, DING Yu, YANG Yong-Qiang, Tuerxunnayi REYIMU. Characteristics of plant functional groups and the relationships with soil environmental factors in middle part of northern slope of Tianshan Mountains under different grazing intensities [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(6): 701-718. |
| [10] | WU Ru-Ru, LIU Mei-Zhen, GU Xian, CHANG Xin-Yue, GUO Li-Yue, JIANG Gao-Ming, QI Ru-Yi. Prediction of suitable habitat distribution and potential impact of climate change on distribution patterns of Cupressus gigantea [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(4): 445-458. |
| [11] | PAN Yuan-Fang, PAN Liang-Hao, QIU Si-Ting, QIU Guang-Long, SU Zhi-Nan, SHI Xiao-Fang, FAN Hang-Qing. Variations in tree height among mangroves and their environmental adaptive mechanisms in China’s coastal areas [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(4): 483-495. |
| [12] | ZHANG Ji-Shen, SHI Xin-Jie, LIU Yu-Nuo, WU Yang, PENG Shou-Zhang. Dynamics of ecosystem carbon storage of potential natural vegetation in China under climate change [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(4): 428-444. |
| [13] | WANG Fu-Biao, YE Zi-Piao. A review on light response models of electron transport rates of plant [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(3): 287-305. |
| [14] | LAN Guang-Fei, ZHANG Qiang, CHEN Xiang-Biao, CHEN Shi-Dong, XIONG De-Cheng, LIU Xiao-Fei, YANG Zhi-Jie, YANG Yu-Sheng. Seasonal dynamics of litterfall of a Castanopsis kawakamii evergreen broadleaf forest in mid-subtropical China and their influencing factors [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(12): 1589-1601. |
| [15] | YANG Zi-Long, LUO Guang-Yu, LEI Fu-Min, YU Jing-Rou, CAI Sheng-Xuan, YU Jing. Species-area relationship of bryophytes and its influencing factors on the coastal islands in Xiangshan, Zhejiang, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(11): 1486-1500. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2026 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn