Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2005, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 829-835.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2005.0110
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
XU Fu-Xian, XIONG Hong(), ZHU Yong-Chuan, XIE Rong, WANG Gui-Xiong
Received:
2004-03-18
Accepted:
2004-09-20
Online:
2005-03-18
Published:
2005-08-30
Contact:
XIONG Hong
About author:
* E-mail: xiongh57@163.comXU Fu-Xian, XIONG Hong, ZHU Yong-Chuan, XIE Rong, WANG Gui-Xiong. THE EFFECTS OF CULTIVATION DENSITY ON THE PERCENT OF HEAD MILLED RICE AND SOURCE TO SINK RATIOS OF MID-SEASON HYBRID RICE IN EASTERN AND SOUTHERN SICHUAN PROVINCE[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2005, 29(5): 829-835.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.17521/cjpe.2005.0110
整精米率表现 Show of head milled rice | 组 合 Hybrid | 超稀栽培 (SSC)(%) | 传统栽培 (TC)(%) | SSC-TC | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(%) | T检验值 | |||||||||||||||||
增加组合 (SIH) | ‘D优162’‘D you 162’ | 57.64 | 41.80 | 15.84 | 17.60** | |||||||||||||
‘II优57’‘II you 57’ | 51.89 | 39.32 | 12.57 | 6.92** | ||||||||||||||
‘II优602’‘II you 602’ | 51.77 | 39.35 | 12.42 | 15.33** | ||||||||||||||
‘II优7号’‘II you 7’ | 35.44 | 23.93 | 11.51 | 19.38** | ||||||||||||||
‘D优527’‘D you 527’ | 41.45 | 30.43 | 11.02 | 14.11** | ||||||||||||||
‘II-32A/2041’ | 46.47 | 37.84 | 8.63 | 3.77* | ||||||||||||||
‘冈优602’‘ Gangyou 602’ | 39.85 | 31.41 | 8.44 | 4.96* | ||||||||||||||
‘II优4176’‘ II you 4176’ | 53.92 | 46.56 | 7.36 | 4.75* | ||||||||||||||
持平组合 (NDH) | ‘K18/725’ | 47.12 | 43.63 | 3.49 | 2.19NS | |||||||||||||
‘D优602’‘D you 602’ | 53.47 | 50.28 | 3.19 | 2.84NS | ||||||||||||||
‘汕优63’‘Shuangyou 63’ | 42.32 | 39.88 | 2.44 | 1.93NS | ||||||||||||||
‘冈优151’‘Gangyou 151’ | 41.36 | 46.03 | -4.67 | -2.86NS | ||||||||||||||
降低组合 (SDH) | ‘II优725’‘II you 725’ | 24.60 | 33.94 | -9.34 | -4.37* | |||||||||||||
‘D62/R102’ | 35.85 | 47.40 | -11.55 | -8.71** | ||||||||||||||
‘冈优1577’‘Gangyou 1577’ | 30.98 | 43.81 | -12.83 | -10.06** | ||||||||||||||
‘金优725’‘Jinyou 725’ | 35.01 | 47.96 | -12.95 | -12.47** | ||||||||||||||
‘冈优22’‘Gangyou 22’ | 33.60 | 46.67 | -13.07 | -23.59** | ||||||||||||||
‘冈优725’‘Gangyou 725’ | 34.33 | 50.41 | -16.08 | -9.74** | ||||||||||||||
方差分析F值 F value | 17.67** | 25.97** | 12.40** |
Table 1 The comparison of percentage of head milled rice between system of super sparse cultivation (SSC) and traditional cultivation (TC) for 18 hybrids
整精米率表现 Show of head milled rice | 组 合 Hybrid | 超稀栽培 (SSC)(%) | 传统栽培 (TC)(%) | SSC-TC | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(%) | T检验值 | |||||||||||||||||
增加组合 (SIH) | ‘D优162’‘D you 162’ | 57.64 | 41.80 | 15.84 | 17.60** | |||||||||||||
‘II优57’‘II you 57’ | 51.89 | 39.32 | 12.57 | 6.92** | ||||||||||||||
‘II优602’‘II you 602’ | 51.77 | 39.35 | 12.42 | 15.33** | ||||||||||||||
‘II优7号’‘II you 7’ | 35.44 | 23.93 | 11.51 | 19.38** | ||||||||||||||
‘D优527’‘D you 527’ | 41.45 | 30.43 | 11.02 | 14.11** | ||||||||||||||
‘II-32A/2041’ | 46.47 | 37.84 | 8.63 | 3.77* | ||||||||||||||
‘冈优602’‘ Gangyou 602’ | 39.85 | 31.41 | 8.44 | 4.96* | ||||||||||||||
‘II优4176’‘ II you 4176’ | 53.92 | 46.56 | 7.36 | 4.75* | ||||||||||||||
持平组合 (NDH) | ‘K18/725’ | 47.12 | 43.63 | 3.49 | 2.19NS | |||||||||||||
‘D优602’‘D you 602’ | 53.47 | 50.28 | 3.19 | 2.84NS | ||||||||||||||
‘汕优63’‘Shuangyou 63’ | 42.32 | 39.88 | 2.44 | 1.93NS | ||||||||||||||
‘冈优151’‘Gangyou 151’ | 41.36 | 46.03 | -4.67 | -2.86NS | ||||||||||||||
降低组合 (SDH) | ‘II优725’‘II you 725’ | 24.60 | 33.94 | -9.34 | -4.37* | |||||||||||||
‘D62/R102’ | 35.85 | 47.40 | -11.55 | -8.71** | ||||||||||||||
‘冈优1577’‘Gangyou 1577’ | 30.98 | 43.81 | -12.83 | -10.06** | ||||||||||||||
‘金优725’‘Jinyou 725’ | 35.01 | 47.96 | -12.95 | -12.47** | ||||||||||||||
‘冈优22’‘Gangyou 22’ | 33.60 | 46.67 | -13.07 | -23.59** | ||||||||||||||
‘冈优725’‘Gangyou 725’ | 34.33 | 50.41 | -16.08 | -9.74** | ||||||||||||||
方差分析F值 F value | 17.67** | 25.97** | 12.40** |
整精米率表现 Show of head milled rice | 组合数 No. of hybrids | 栽培方式 Cultivation way | 着粒数(粒/穗) Spikelets per panicle | |
---|---|---|---|---|
变 幅 Range | 平均值 Average value | |||
增加组合SIH | 8 | 超稀栽培SSC | 175.19~197.61 | 184.72 |
传统栽培TC | 143.79~169.22 | 155.96 | ||
持平组合NDH | 4 | 超稀栽培SSC | 192.17~209.25 | 201.17 |
传统栽培TC | 171.94~186.82 | 180.24 | ||
降低组合SDH | 6 | 超稀栽培SSC | 216.02~270.71 | 239.37 |
传统栽培TC | 189.33~217.22 | 196.30 |
Table 2 The comparison of spikelet per panicle for hybrids that showed different percentage of head milled rice in super sparse cultivation
整精米率表现 Show of head milled rice | 组合数 No. of hybrids | 栽培方式 Cultivation way | 着粒数(粒/穗) Spikelets per panicle | |
---|---|---|---|---|
变 幅 Range | 平均值 Average value | |||
增加组合SIH | 8 | 超稀栽培SSC | 175.19~197.61 | 184.72 |
传统栽培TC | 143.79~169.22 | 155.96 | ||
持平组合NDH | 4 | 超稀栽培SSC | 192.17~209.25 | 201.17 |
传统栽培TC | 171.94~186.82 | 180.24 | ||
降低组合SDH | 6 | 超稀栽培SSC | 216.02~270.71 | 239.37 |
传统栽培TC | 189.33~217.22 | 196.30 |
项目 Item | 着粒数(粒·穗-1) SPP | 叶粒比(mg·粒-1) LGR | 灌浆速率(mg·粒-1·d-1) GFR | 容重(mg·mL-1) GU | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSC | TC | SSC | TC | SSC | TC | SSC | TC | |
极大值Max. | 270.71 | 217.22 | 8.04 | 8.21 | 1.34 | 1.44 | 1.36 | 1.28 |
极小值Min. | 175.19 | 143.79 | 5.31 | 5.45 | 0.94 | 0.99 | 0.86 | 0.95 |
平均值Mean | 206.71 | 174.79 | 6.64 | 7.04 | 1.20 | 1.31 | 1.07 | 1.10 |
方差分析F值 F value | 20.60** | 17.83** | 9.56** | 12.89** | 8.74** | 10.06** | 13.71** | 11.40** |
Table 3 The show of ratio source to sink and grain filling level between system of super sparse cultivation(SSC) and traditional cultivation(TC) for 18 hybrids
项目 Item | 着粒数(粒·穗-1) SPP | 叶粒比(mg·粒-1) LGR | 灌浆速率(mg·粒-1·d-1) GFR | 容重(mg·mL-1) GU | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSC | TC | SSC | TC | SSC | TC | SSC | TC | |
极大值Max. | 270.71 | 217.22 | 8.04 | 8.21 | 1.34 | 1.44 | 1.36 | 1.28 |
极小值Min. | 175.19 | 143.79 | 5.31 | 5.45 | 0.94 | 0.99 | 0.86 | 0.95 |
平均值Mean | 206.71 | 174.79 | 6.64 | 7.04 | 1.20 | 1.31 | 1.07 | 1.10 |
方差分析F值 F value | 20.60** | 17.83** | 9.56** | 12.89** | 8.74** | 10.06** | 13.71** | 11.40** |
回归方程 Regression equation | y | x | r | R2 | n |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
y=-5.82+11.875 9x-5.01x2 | 籽粒容重 Grain unit | 灌浆速率 Grain filling rate | 0.732 7** | 0.536 9 | 36 |
y=84.725 4-0.479 5x | 整精米率差值 Head milled rice (SSC-TC) | 传统栽培着粒数 SPP for TC | -0.879 1** | 0.772 9 | 18 |
Table 4 Regression analysis between head milled rice and its correlation characters
回归方程 Regression equation | y | x | r | R2 | n |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
y=-5.82+11.875 9x-5.01x2 | 籽粒容重 Grain unit | 灌浆速率 Grain filling rate | 0.732 7** | 0.536 9 | 36 |
y=84.725 4-0.479 5x | 整精米率差值 Head milled rice (SSC-TC) | 传统栽培着粒数 SPP for TC | -0.879 1** | 0.772 9 | 18 |
组 合 Hybrid | 处 理 Treatment | 叶粒比(mg·粒-1) LGR | 灌浆速率 (mg·粒-1·d-1) GFR | 容 重(mg·mL-1) GU | 整精米率 PHMR (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘冈优22’‘Gangyou 22’ | 剪1/3颖花 1/3 grain cut | 9.08 | 1.47a | 1.06b | 32.64b |
剪1/3叶片1/3 leaf cut | 4.03 | 0.90c | 0.98c | 22.07c | |
对照CK | 6.05 | 1.24b | 1.19a | 41.92a | |
‘II优7号’‘II you 7’ | 剪1/3叶片1/3 leaf cut | 5.43 | 1.18b | 1.33a | 46.55a |
剪1/2叶片1/2 leaf cut | 4.07 | 0.96c | 1.01c | 17.32c | |
对照CK | 8.14 | 1.35a | 1.09b | 25.87b |
Table 5 The effect of the ratio source to sink were changed of same combination at heading stage on its percentage of head milled rice
组 合 Hybrid | 处 理 Treatment | 叶粒比(mg·粒-1) LGR | 灌浆速率 (mg·粒-1·d-1) GFR | 容 重(mg·mL-1) GU | 整精米率 PHMR (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘冈优22’‘Gangyou 22’ | 剪1/3颖花 1/3 grain cut | 9.08 | 1.47a | 1.06b | 32.64b |
剪1/3叶片1/3 leaf cut | 4.03 | 0.90c | 0.98c | 22.07c | |
对照CK | 6.05 | 1.24b | 1.19a | 41.92a | |
‘II优7号’‘II you 7’ | 剪1/3叶片1/3 leaf cut | 5.43 | 1.18b | 1.33a | 46.55a |
剪1/2叶片1/2 leaf cut | 4.07 | 0.96c | 1.01c | 17.32c | |
对照CK | 8.14 | 1.35a | 1.09b | 25.87b |
[1] | Fu BM(胡秉民), Zhang QD(张全德) (1985). Method of Statistics Analysis for Agricultural Experiment. Zhejiang Science and Technology Publishing House, Hangzhou,72-240. (in Chinese) |
[2] | Liao FM(廖伏明), Zhou KL (周坤炉), Yang HH (阳和华) (1999). Study on the rice quality of three-line indica hybrid rice. Hybrid Rice (杂交水稻), 146,35-38. (in Chinese) |
[3] | Ma J(马均), Tao SS(陶诗顺) (2002). Study on the practice and high-yield mechanism of super-sparse cultivation associated with maximum-tiller seedling of hybrid rice. Scientia Agricultura Sinica (中国农业科学), 351,42-48. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[4] | Quality and Technology Control Bureau of China(国家质量技术监督局)(1999). Nation quality standards for main grain crop(GB/T17891—1999), www.ccvi.net:1-11. (in Chinese) |
[5] | Shen B(沈波) (2000). Observation on the starch development in endosperm of early indica rice during chalkiness formation with scanning electronic microscope. Chinese Journal of Rice Science (中国水稻科学), 144,225-228. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[6] | Xu FX(徐富贤), Hong S (洪松) (1994). Review on effect of environmental factors on rice quality. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences (西南农业学报), 72,101-105. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[7] | Xu FX(徐富贤), Zheng JK(郑家奎), Zhu YC(朱永川), Wang GX(王贵雄) (2003a). Effects of the cultivation by super transplanting of small seedlings on the growth of medium hybrid rice in winter waterlogged fields. Hybrid Rice (杂交水稻), 183,40-43. (in Chinese) |
[8] | Xu FX(徐富贤), Zheng JK (郑家奎), Zhu YC(朱永川), Wang GX(王贵雄) (2003b). Effect of atmospheric phenomena factors on the milling quality and the appearance quality of medium Indica hybrid rice during the period from full heading to maturity. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 27,73-77. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[9] | Zhu YC(朱永川), Xu FX(徐富贤), Zheng JK(郑家奎), Wang GX(王贵雄) (2001). The appearance quality of good quality rice of Sichuan Province. China Rice (中国稻米), 2,33-34. (in Chinese) |
[1] |
Jia WEN Xin-Na ZHANG 娟 王 Xiu-Hai ZHAO Chun-Yu ZHANG.
Responses of seedling survival rate to neighbor competition and environmental variables regulated by traits [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(预发表): 0-0. |
[2] | ZHAO Rong-Jiang, CHEN Tao, DONG Li-Jia, GUO Hui, MA Hai-Kun, SONG Xu, WANG Ming-Gang, XUE Wei, YANG Qiang. Progress of plant-soil feedback in ecology studies [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(10): 1333-1355. |
[3] | SHI Huan-Huan, XUE Qiong, YU Zhen-Lin, WANG Cheng-Huan. Effects of density and species proportion on intraspecific and interspecific interactions between salt marsh plants during seed germination [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(1): 77-87. |
[4] | ZHANG Hui, ZENG Wen-Jing, GONG Xin-Tao, MA Ze-Qing. Relationships between root hairs and mycorrhizal fungi across typical subtropical tree species [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(1): 88-100. |
[5] | FENG Ji-Guang, ZHANG Qiu-Fang, YUAN Xia, ZHU Biao. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus addition on soil organic carbon: review and prospects [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(8): 855-870. |
[6] | XIONG Ying-Jie, YU Guo, WEI Kai-Lu, PENG Juan, GENG Hong-Ru, YANG Dong-Mei, PENG Guo-Quan. Relationships between lamina size, vein density and vein cell wall dry mass per unit vein length of broad-leaved woody species in Tiantong Mountain, southeastern China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(2): 136-147. |
[7] | ZHAO Wen-Qin, XI Ben-Ye, LIU Jin-Qiang, LIU Yang, ZOU Song-Yan, SONG Wu-Ye, CHEN Li-Xin. Transpiration process and environmental response of poplar plantation under different irrigation conditions [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2021, 45(4): 370-382. |
[8] | WANG Yin-Liu, GENG Qian-Qian, HUANG Jian-Hui, WANG Chang-Hui, LI Lei, HASI Muqier, NIU Guo-Xiang. Effects of nitrogen addition and planting density on the growth and biological nitrogen fixation of Lespedeza davurica [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2021, 45(1): 13-22. |
[9] | YU Qing-Han, JIN Guang-Ze, LIU Zhi-Li. Plant size, branch age and environment factors co-drive variations of branch traits of Pinus koraiensis [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2020, 44(9): 939-950. |
[10] | FENG Yin-Ping, SHEN Hai-Hua, LUO Yong-Kai, XU Long-Chao, LIU Shang-Shi, ZHU Yan-Kun, ZHAO Meng-Ying, XING Ai-Jun, FANG Jing-Yun. Effects of planting density on growth and biomass of Medicago sativa [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2020, 44(3): 248-256. |
[11] | LI Xu, WU Ting, CHENG Yan, TAN Na-Dan, JIANG Fen, LIU Shi-Zhong, CHU Guo-Wei, MENG Ze, LIU Ju-Xiu. Ecophysiological adaptability of four tree species in the southern subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest to warming [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2020, 44(12): 1203-1214. |
[12] | LI Na, ZHANG Yi-He, HAN Xiao-Zeng, YOU Meng-Yang, HAO Xiang-Xiang. Effects of long-term vegetation cover changes on the organic carbon fractions in soil aggregates of mollisols [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2019, 43(7): 624-634. |
[13] | FENG Hui-Fang, LIU Luo-Yu, XUE Li. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus additions and stand density on soil chemical property in Acacia auriculiformis stands [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2019, 43(11): 1010-1020. |
[14] | ZHANG Zhen-Zhen, YANG Ke-Jia, GU Yu-Lu, ZHAO Ping, OUYANG Lei. Effects of simulated changes in precipitation pattern on sap flux in two tree species in subtropical region [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2019, 43(11): 988-998. |
[15] | MENG Ling-Jun, YAO Jie, QIN Jiang-Huan, FAN Chun-Yu, ZHANG Chun-Yu, ZHAO Xiu-Hai. Drivers of composition and density pattern of tree seedlings in a secondary mixed conifer and broad-leaved forest, Jiaohe, Jilin, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2018, 42(6): 653-662. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn