Transpiration process and environmental response of poplar plantation under different irrigation conditions

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2020.0343

Abstract

Abstract:

Aims Understanding the relationship between transpiration and environmental factors is critical to the establishment of efficient irrigation strategies for Populus tomentosa. Therefore, we studied transpiration and environmental responses of P. tomentosa under varied irrigation treatments.

Methods This study was carried out at the triploidP. tomentosaplantation in Gaotang County, Shandong Province. The irrigation treatments were set as full irrigation (DF, irrigated when the soil water potential at 20 cm directly below the dripper reached -18 kPa), water-controlled irrigation (DC, irrigated when the soil water potential at 20 cm directly below the dripper reached -45 kPa) and no irrigation (CK, blank control). Thermal dissipation probes (TDP) were used to observe the continuous sap flow ofP. tomentosa during the growing season of 2019. The environmental factors were simultaneously monitored, including solar radiation (SR), air temperature (T_a), soil moisture content (SWC) and wind speed (WS).

Important findings 1) The trend of the diurnal sap flow variation of P. tomentosa was similar among the contrasting treatments, showing a single-peak curve, and there was significant sap flow at night. Irrigation treatments did not influence the start of stem sap flow but caused differences in the timing of the stem peak flow. The peak flow arrived earlier in the DF treatment than in other treatments. Irrigation increased the transpiration ofP. tomentosa. However, the transpiration would increase with the decrease of soil moisture deficit threshold of irrigation, namely transpiration of DC followed by DF and CK in sequence. 2) There was significant time-lag between the sap flow and SR and VPD. The sap flow was ahead of the VPD and lagged behind the SR. Irrigation treatments have no significant effect on the time-lag effect between the sap flow and environmental factors. 3) Under the three treatments, transpiration has a significantly positive correlation with VPD, SR and SWC, and negatively correlated with wind speed. The transpiration responses to the environmental factors varied among irrigation treatments. In summary, irrigation could effectively mediate the hydraulic adaptation of plantation trees to the environment factors. However, increased irrigation does not necessarily lead to transpiration enhancement. Based on the differences of stand transpiration and natural rainfall, irrigation during the beginning of the growing season (April to July in this study) would benefit the hydraulic physiological activity of theP. tomentosa plantation.

Key words: environmental factor, irrigation, sap flow density, stand transpiration

ZHAO Wen-Qin, XI Ben-Ye, LIU Jin-Qiang, LIU Yang, ZOU Song-Yan, SONG Wu-Ye, CHEN Li-Xin. Transpiration process and environmental response of poplar plantation under different irrigation conditions[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2021, 45(4): 370-382.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.17521/cjpe.2020.0343

https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/Y2021/V45/I4/370

Figures/Tables 10

References 58

[1]	Bernier PY, Bartlett P, Black TA, Barr A, Kljun N, McCaughey JH (2006). Drought constraints on transpiration and canopy conductance in mature aspen and jack pine stands. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 140, 64-78. DOI URL
[2]	Bi HL, Lan ZP, Sun SW, Fu JP, Peng JJ, Ma X ( 2017). Spatial distribution of fine root in the poplar plantation under drip irrigation. Forest Research, 30, 946-953.
	[ 秘洪雷, 兰再平, 孙尚伟, 傅建平, 彭晶晶, 马鑫 ( 2017). 滴灌栽培杨树人工林细根空间分布特征. 林业科学研究, 30, 946-953.]
[3]	Campbell GS, Norman JM (1977). An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics. Springer,New York.
[4]	Chen SN, Kong Z, Chen LX, Liu QQ, Liu PS, Zhang ZZ ( 2020). The stand transpiration characteristics of Pinus tabulaeformisand its influential factors in a semi-arid urban environment . Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40, 1269-1280.
	[ 陈胜楠, 孔喆, 陈立欣, 刘清泉, 刘平生, 张志强 ( 2020). 半干旱区城市环境下油松林分蒸腾特征及其影响因子. 生态学报, 40, 1269-1280.]
[5]	Chuang YL, Oren R, Bertozzi AL, Phillips N, Katul GG (2006). The porous media model for the hydraulic system of a conifer tree: linking sap flux data to transpiration rate. Ecological Modelling, 191, 447-468. DOI URL
[6]	Coyle DR, Coleman MD (2005). Forest production responses to irrigation and fertilization are not explained by shifts in allocation. Forest Ecology and Management, 208, 137-152. DOI URL
[7]	Dang HZ, Yang WB, Li W, Zhang YY, Li CL ( 2014). Radial variation and time lag of sap flow of Populus gansuensis in Minqin Oasis, Northwest China . Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 25, 2501-2510.
	[ 党宏忠, 杨文斌, 李卫, 张友焱, 李昌龙 ( 2014). 民勤绿洲二白杨树干液流的径向变化及时滞特征. 应用生态学报, 25, 2501-2510.]
[8]	Daudet FA, Le Roux X, Sinoquet H, Adam B (1999). Wind speed and leaf boundary layer conductance variation within tree crown. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 97, 171-185. DOI URL
[9]	Dong WY, Qin J, Li JY, Zhao Y, Nie LS, Zhang ZY (2011). Interactions between soil water content and fertilizer on growth characteristics and biomass yield of Chinese white poplar (Populus tomentosaCarr.) seedlings. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 57, 303-312. DOI URL
[10]	Dragoni D, Caylor KK, Schmid HP (2008). Decoupling structural and environmental determinants of sap velocity. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 149, 570-581. DOI URL
[11]	Du TS, Kang SZ, Zhang BZ, Li SE, Yang XY ( 2008). Stem sap flow of grape under different drip irrigation patterns and its relationships with environmental factors in arid oasis region of Shiyang River basin. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 19, 299-305.
	[ 杜太生, 康绍忠, 张宝忠, 李思恩, 杨秀英 ( 2008). 石羊河流域干旱荒漠绿洲区不同滴灌模式下葡萄茎液流变化及其与环境因子的关系. 应用生态学报, 19, 299-305.]
[12]	Ford CR, Goranson CE, Mitchell RJ, Will RE, Teskey RO (2004). Diurnal and seasonal variability in the radial distribution of sap flow: predicting total stem flow in Pinus taeda trees. Tree Physiology, 24, 951-960. DOI URL
[13]	Granier A (1987). Evaluation of transpiration in a Douglas-fir stand by means of sap flow measurements. Tree Physiology, 3, 309-320. PMID
[14]	Granier A, Biron P, Lemoine D (2000). Water balance, transpiration and canopy conductance in two beech stands. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 100, 291-308. DOI URL
[15]	Hogg EH, Hurdle PA (1997). Sap flow in trembling aspen: implications for stomatal responses to vapor pressure deficit. Tree Physiology, 17, 501-509. PMID
[16]	Hutley LB, O’Grady AP, Eamus D (2001). Monsoonal influences on evapotranspiration of savanna vegetation of northern Australia. Oecologia, 126, 434-443. DOI PMID
[17]	Jia LM, Xing CS, Li JR, Wei YK ( 2005). Productivity and benefit analysis of fast-growing and high-yield plantations of poplar under subsurface drip irrigation. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 27(6), 43-49.
	[ 贾黎明, 邢长山, 李景锐, 韦艳葵 ( 2005). 地下滴灌条件下杨树速生丰产林生产力及效益分析. 北京林业大学学报, 27(6), 43-49.]
[18]	Kagotani Y, Nishida K, Kiyomizu T, Sasaki K, Kume A, Hanba YT (2016). Photosynthetic responses to soil water stress in summer in two Japanese urban landscape tree species (Ginkgo biloba and Prunus yedoensis): effects of pruning mulch and irrigation management. Trees, 30, 697-708. DOI URL
[19]	Kumagai T, Saitoh TM, Sato Y, Morooka T, Manfroi OJ, Kuraji K, Suzuki M (2004). Transpiration, canopy conductance and the decoupling coefficient of a lowland mixed dipterocarp forest in Sarawak, Borneo: dry spell effects. Journal of Hydrology, 287, 237-251. DOI URL
[20]	Kumagai T, Tateishi M, Shimizu T, Otsuki K (2008). Transpiration and canopy conductance at two slope positions in a Japanese cedar forest watershed. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 148, 1444-1455. DOI URL
[21]	Kume T, Komatsu H, Kuraji K, Suzuki M (2008). Less than 20-min time lags between transpiration and stem sap flow in emergent trees in a Bornean tropical rainforest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 148, 1181-1189. DOI URL
[22]	Liu DL, Li JY, Ma D ( 2008). Spatial variation pattern of Platycladus orientalis stem sap flow . Chinese Journal of Ecology, 27, 1262-1268.
	[ 刘德良, 李吉跃, 马达 ( 2008). 侧柏树干边材液流空间变化规律. 生态学杂志, 27, 1262-1268.]
[23]	Liu WN, Jia JB, Yu XX, Jia GD, Hou GR ( 2017). Characteristics of canopy stomatal conductance ofPlatycladus orientalisand its responses to environmental factors in the mountainous area of North China . Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 28, 3217-3226.
	[ 刘文娜, 贾剑波, 余新晓, 贾国栋, 侯贵荣 ( 2017). 华北山区侧柏冠层气孔导度特征及其对环境因子的响应. 应用生态学报, 28, 3217-3226.]
[24]	Ma CM, Ma YJ, Cheng YM ( 2017). Characteristics and the driving forces of sap flow in stems of Populus beijingensis in Bashang area of north-west Hebei . Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 31, 338-344.
	[ 马长明, 马玉洁, 程月明 ( 2017). 冀西北坝上干旱区北京杨树干液流特征及影响因素分析. 水土保持学报, 31, 338-344.]
[25]	McIlroy IC (1984). Terminology and concepts in natural evaporation. Agricultural Water Management, 8, 77-98. DOI URL
[26]	Nicolás E, Barradas VL, Ortuño MF, Navarro A, Torrecillas A, Alarcón JJ (2008). Environmental and stomatal control of transpiration, canopy conductance and decoupling coefficient in young lemon trees under shading net. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 63, 200-206. DOI URL
[27]	O’Neill MK, Shock CC, Lombard KA, Heyduck RF, Feibert EBG, Smeal D, Arnold RN (2010). Hybrid poplar (Populusssp.) selections for arid and semi-arid intermountain regions of the western United States. Agroforestry Systems, 79, 409-418. DOI URL
[28]	Oishi AC, Hawthorne DA, Oren R (2016). Baseliner: an open-source, interactive tool for processing sap flux data from thermal dissipation probes. SoftwareX, 5, 139-143. DOI URL
[29]	Oishi AC, Oren R, Stoy PC (2008). Estimating components of forest evapotranspiration: a footprint approach for scaling sap flux measurements. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 148, 1719-1732. DOI URL
[30]	Oren R, Pataki DE (2001). Transpiration in response to variation in microclimate and soil moisture in southeastern deciduous forests. Oecologia, 127, 549-559. DOI PMID
[31]	Ou ZY, Pang SL, Tan ZQ, He F, Lu GD, Shen WH ( 2020). Effects of drought stress on photosynthesis and water consumption of main afforestation tree species in the rocky desert area in Southwest Guangxi. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 39, 3237-3246.
	[ 欧芷阳, 庞世龙, 谭长强, 何峰, 陆国导, 申文辉 ( 2020). 干旱胁迫对桂西南石漠化地区主要造林树种光合及耗水特性的影响. 生态学杂志, 39, 3237-3246.]
[32]	Phillips N, Nagchaudhuri A, Oren R, Katul G (1997). Time constant for water transport in loblolly pine trees estimated from time series of evaporative demand and stem sapflow. Trees, 11, 412-419. DOI URL
[33]	Ren ZX, Nie LS, Zhang Q, Xin Y, Song LJ, Luo PP ( 2011). Stem volume current annual growth rhythm of four Populus tomentosa clones under water-nitrogen coupling and variety selection . Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 31(8), 187-193.
	[ 任忠秀, 聂立水, 张强, 辛颖, 宋莲君, 罗盼盼 ( 2011). 水氮耦合下毛白杨无性系材积生长规律及品种选择. 中南林业科技大学学报, 31(8), 187-193.]
[34]	Roberts T, Lazarovitch N, Warrick AW, Thompson TL (2009). Modeling salt accumulation with subsurface drip irrigation using HYDRUS-2D. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 73, 233-240. DOI URL
[35]	Roman DT, Novick KA, Brzostek ER, Dragoni D, Rahman F, Phillips RP (2015). The role of isohydric and anisohydric species in determining ecosystem-scale response to severe drought. Oecologia, 179, 641-654. DOI PMID
[36]	Samuelson LJ, Stokes TA, Coleman MD (2007). Influence of irrigation and fertilization on transpiration and hydraulic properties ofPopulus deltoides. Tree Physiology, 27, 765-774. PMID
[37]	Sang YQ, Guo F, Zhang JS, Meng P, Gao J ( 2009). Variation in transpiration of Populus bolleana and the influence factors in Maowusu sandy area . Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 45(9), 66-71.
	[ 桑玉强, 郭芳, 张劲松, 孟平, 高峻 ( 2009). 毛乌素沙地新疆杨蒸腾变化规律及其影响因素. 林业科学, 45(9), 66-71.]
[38]	Schäfer KVR, Oren R, Tenhunen JD (2000). The effect of tree height on crown level stomatal conductance. Plant, Cell & Environment, 23, 365-375.
[39]	Shi C, Fan WB, Zhu HK, Wang JL ( 2011). Research on water use of Populus bolleana under different irrigation gradients and irrigation systems . China Rural Water and Hydropower, ( 9), 1-4.
	[ 史册, 范文波, 朱红凯, 王久龙 ( 2011). 不同灌水梯度下新疆杨耗水过程与灌溉制度初步研究. 中国农村水利水电, ( 9), 1-4.]
[40]	Sun D, Guan DX, Yuan FH, Wang AZ, Wu JB ( 2010). Time lag effect between poplar sap flow velocity and microclimate factors in agroforestry system in west Liaoning Province. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 21, 2742-2748. PMID
	[ 孙迪, 关德新, 袁凤辉, 王安志, 吴家兵 ( 2010). 辽西农林复合系统中杨树液流速率与气象因子的时滞效应. 应用生态学报, 21, 2742-2748.] PMID
[41]	Sun HZ, Zhou XF, Zhao HX ( 2002). A researches on stem sap flow dynamics of Betula platyphylla . Acta Ecologica Sinica, 22, 1387-1391.
	[ 孙慧珍, 周晓峰, 赵惠勋 ( 2002). 白桦树干液流的动态研究. 生态学报, 22, 1387-1391.]
[42]	Sun L, Peng ZD, Wang JX, Lin YF ( 2015). Transpiration water consumption and growth of four energy resources plants of shrubs under different soil contents. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 35(10), 54-61.
	[ 孙龙, 彭祚登, 王佳茜, 林玉峰 ( 2015). 不同土壤水分对4个灌木能源树种生长和蒸腾耗水的影响. 中南林业科技大学学报, 35(10), 54-61.]
[43]	Sun ZD, Nie LS, Xin Y, Luo PP, Ren ZX, Wei D, Li JY, Shen YB, Zhang ZY ( 2012). Coupling effect of water and nitrogen fertilizer on growth of established triploid Populus tomentosa . Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 43, 896-902.
	[ 孙兆地, 聂立水, 辛颖, 罗盼盼, 任忠秀, 韦丹, 李吉跃, 沈应柏, 张志毅 ( 2012). 水氮耦合效应对三倍体毛白杨林木生长状况的影响. 土壤通报, 43, 896-902.]
[44]	Ungar ED, Rotenberg E, Raz-Yaseef N, Cohen S, Yakir D, Schiller G (2013). Transpiration and annual water balance of Aleppo pine in a semiarid region: implications for forest management. Forest Ecology and Management, 298, 39-51. DOI URL
[45]	Urban J, Ingwers MW, McGuire MA, Teskey RO (2017). Increase in leaf temperature opens stomata and decouples net photosynthesis from stomatal conductance in Pinus taeda and Populus deltoides × nigra. Journal of Experimental Botany, 68, 1757-1767. DOI URL
[46]	Wang H, Ouyang ZY, Zheng H, Wang XK, Ni YM, Ren YF ( 2009). Time lag characteristics of stem sap flow of common tree species during their growth season in Beijing downtown. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 20, 2111-2117. PMID
	[ 王华, 欧阳志云, 郑华, 王效科, 倪永明, 任玉芬 ( 2009). 北京城区常见树种生长季树干液流的时滞特征. 应用生态学报, 20, 2111-2117.] PMID
[47]	Wang H, Zhao P, Cai XA, Ma L, Rao XQ, Zeng XP ( 2008). Time lag effect between stem sap flow and photosynthetically active radiation, vapor pressure deficit of Acacia mangium . Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 19, 225-230. PMID
	[ 王华, 赵平, 蔡锡安, 马玲, 饶兴权, 曾小平 ( 2008). 马占相思树干液流与光合有效辐射和水汽压亏缺间的时滞效应. 应用生态学报, 19, 225-230.] PMID
[48]	Wang JF ( 2019). Comparative analysis on growth of poplar seedlings under two hard branch cutting methods. Forest Investigation Design, 1, 90-92.
	[ 王剑锋 ( 2019). 两种硬枝扦插方式下的杨树苗生长比较分析. 林业勘查设计, 1, 90-92.]
[49]	Wang S, Fan J, Ge JM, Wang QM, Fu W (2019). Discrepancy in tree transpiration of Salix matsudana, Populus simoniiunder distinct soil, topography conditions in an ecological rehabilitation area on the Northern Loess Plateau. Forest Ecology and Management, 432, 675-685. DOI URL
[50]	Wang X, Yu XX, Jia GD, Qiu YX, Shi JM, Zi ED ( 2020). Physiological activities and nitrogen allocation strategies of Platycladus orientalis seedlings under different soil water conditions . Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 34, 311-317.
	[ 王鑫, 余新晓, 贾国栋, 邱云霄, 史佳美, 孜尔蝶 ( 2020). 不同土壤水分条件下侧柏幼苗的生理活动及氮素分配策略. 水土保持学报, 34, 311-317.]
[51]	Xi BY ( 2013). Research on Theories of Irrigation Management and Key Techniques of High Efficient Subsurface Drip Irrigation in Populus tomentosa Plantation . PhD dissertation, Beijing Forestry University,Beijing.
	[ 席本野 ( 2013). 毛白杨人工林灌溉管理理论及高效地下滴灌关键技术研究. 博士学位论文, 北京林业大学, 北京.]
[52]	Xi BY, Bloomberg M, Watt MS, Wang Y, Jia LM (2016). Modeling growth response to soil water availability simulated by HYDRUS for a mature triploid Populus tomentosa plantation located on the North China Plain. Agricultural Water Management, 176, 243-254. DOI URL
[53]	Xi BY, Li GD, Bloomberg M, Jia LM (2014). The effects of subsurface irrigation at different soil water potential thresholds on the growth and transpiration of Populus tomentosain the North China Plain. Australian Forestry, 77, 159-167. DOI URL
[54]	Xin FM, Yan XL, Zhang CY, Jia LM (2019). Characteristics of stem sap flow of two poplar species and their responses to environmental factors in Lhasa river valley of Tibet. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 55, 22-32.
[55]	Yan CZ, Zheng WG, Jia JB, Yan WD, Wang ZC, Jia GD ( 2020). Responses of canopy stomatal conductance of Platycladus orientalis to soil water under water control . Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 31, 4017-4026.
	[ 颜成正, 郑文革, 贾剑波, 闫文德, 王忠诚, 贾国栋 ( 2020). 控水条件下侧柏冠层气孔导度对土壤水的响应. 应用生态学报, 31, 4017-4026.]
[56]	Yang J, Lyu JL, He QY, Yan MJ, Li GQ, Du S ( 2019). Time lag of stem sap flow and its relationships with transpiration characteristics in Quercus liaotungensis and Robina pseudoacaciain the loess hilly region, China . Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 30, 2607-2613. DOI PMID
	[ 杨洁, 吕金林, 何秋月, 闫美杰, 李国庆, 杜盛 ( 2019). 黄土丘陵区辽东栎和刺槐树干液流时滞效应与蒸腾特征的关联性. 应用生态学报, 30, 2607-2613.] PMID
[57]	Zhang HD, Wei W, Chen LD, Wang LX (2017). Effects of terracing on soil water and canopy transpiration of Pinus tabulaeformis in the Loess Plateau of China. Ecological Engineering, 102, 557-564. DOI URL
[58]	Zhang ZZ, Zhao P, Zhao XH, Zhou J, Zhao PQ, Zeng XM, Hu YT, Ouyang L (2018). The tree height-related spatial variances of tree Sap flux density and its scale-up to stand transpiration in a subtropical evergreen broadleaf forest. Ecohydrology, 11, e1979. DOI: 10.1002/eco.1979. DOI URL

处理 Treatment	样树 Sample tree	树高 Height (m)	胸径 Diameter breast height (cm)	边材厚度 Sapwood thickness (cm)	边材面积 Sapwood area (cm²)
充分灌溉 Full irrigation	1	13.6	13.8	5.8	134.86
	2	10.2	14.2	5.9	142.85
	3	14.4	12.5	5.3	110.51
	4	13.6	14.0	5.8	138.82
	5	10.5	14.0	5.8	138.82
控水灌溉 Water-controlled irrigation	1	10.0	11.4	4.8	91.80
	2	14.2	15.1	6.2	161.66
	3	12.8	13.9	5.8	136.84
对照 Control	1	10.3	10.7	4.5	80.81
	2	13.4	14.3	6.0	144.88
	3	11.6	11.2	4.7	87.80
	4	12.5	12.5	5.3	110.51

处理 Treatment	样树 Sample tree	树高 Height (m)	胸径 Diameter breast height (cm)	边材厚度 Sapwood thickness (cm)	边材面积 Sapwood area (cm²)
充分灌溉 Full irrigation	1	13.6	13.8	5.8	134.86
	2	10.2	14.2	5.9	142.85
	3	14.4	12.5	5.3	110.51
	4	13.6	14.0	5.8	138.82
	5	10.5	14.0	5.8	138.82
控水灌溉 Water-controlled irrigation	1	10.0	11.4	4.8	91.80
	2	14.2	15.1	6.2	161.66
	3	12.8	13.9	5.8	136.84
对照 Control	1	10.3	10.7	4.5	80.81
	2	13.4	14.3	6.0	144.88
	3	11.6	11.2	4.7	87.80
	4	12.5	12.5	5.3	110.51

月份 Month	处理 Treatment	启动时刻 Start time	到达峰值的时刻 Peak time	峰值 Peak F_d value (mL·m^-2·s^-1)	平均液流通量密度 Daily F_d value (mL·m^-2·s^-1)
4	DF	8:00 ± 60 min	13:00 ± 100 min	32.94 ± 3.47 ^a	10.66 ± 2.64 ^a
	DC	8:00 ± 70 min	13:00 ± 90 min	72.60 ± 4.77 ^a	24.65 ± 7.09 ^b
	CK	8:00 ± 100 min	13:10 ± 100 min	36.18 ± 3.77 ^c	12.28 ± 2.32 ^c
5	DF	6:00 ± 40 min	11:10 ± 60 min	63.87 ± 3.11 ^a	24.59 ± 6.74 ^a
	DC	6:00 ± 40 min	11:10 ± 70 min	78.83 ± 4.19 ^b	31.32 ± 8.25 ^a
	CK	6:00 ± 40 min	11:30 ± 70 min	61.61 ± 3.21 ^c	24.27 ± 6.06 ^a
6	DF	5:50 ± 50 min	12:00 ± 70 min	58.00 ± 7.73 ^a	25.03 ± 7.39 ^b
	DC	5:50 ± 50 min	12:00 ± 70 min	69.58 ± 7.43 ^b	30.80 ± 7.65 ^b
	CK	5:50 ± 50 min	12:20 ± 60 min	55.34 ± 6.18 ^ac	24.24 ± 6.15 ^b
7	DF	7:00 ± 40 min	12:00 ± 80 min	51.55 ± 4.75 ^a	19.81 ± 6.31 ^a
	DC	7:00 ± 70 min	12:30 ± 90 min	61.70 ± 5.73 ^b	25.20 ± 5.92 ^a
	CK	7:00 ± 70 min	12:30 ± 80 min	49.98 ± 6.48 ^ac	19.38 ± 5.37 ^a
8	DF	7:20 ± 40 min	12:30 ± 70 min	38.16 ± 13.18 ^a	17.00 ± 6.51 ^a
	DC	7:20 ± 40 min	13:00 ± 60 min	47.40 ± 15.02 ^a	20.98 ± 4.96 ^a
	CK	7:20 ± 40 min	13:00 ± 70 min	41.91 ± 14.63 ^a	19.09 ± 5.32 ^a
9	DF	7:40 ± 40 min	12:20 ± 60 min	35.02 ± 9.22 ^a	13.40 ± 4.52 ^a
	DC	7:40 ± 40 min	12:50 ± 60 min	42.85 ± 9.89 ^b	16.73 ± 3.40 ^a
	CK	7:40 ± 40 min	12:50 ± 50 min	38.73 ± 9.44 ^a	15.53 ± 4.82 ^a
10	DF	9:00 ± 70 min	13:00 ± 100 min	6.55 ± 8.55 ^a	3.37 ± 2.03 ^c
	DC	9:00 ± 70 min	13:30 ± 90 min	11.27 ± 11.01 ^a	4.46 ± 1.54 ^c
	CK	9:00 ± 80 min	13:30 ± 90 min	9.67 ± 10.28 ^c	3.77 ± 1.57 ^c

月份 Month	处理 Treatment	启动时刻 Start time	到达峰值的时刻 Peak time	峰值 Peak F_d value (mL·m^-2·s^-1)	平均液流通量密度 Daily F_d value (mL·m^-2·s^-1)
4	DF	8:00 ± 60 min	13:00 ± 100 min	32.94 ± 3.47 ^a	10.66 ± 2.64 ^a
	DC	8:00 ± 70 min	13:00 ± 90 min	72.60 ± 4.77 ^a	24.65 ± 7.09 ^b
	CK	8:00 ± 100 min	13:10 ± 100 min	36.18 ± 3.77 ^c	12.28 ± 2.32 ^c
5	DF	6:00 ± 40 min	11:10 ± 60 min	63.87 ± 3.11 ^a	24.59 ± 6.74 ^a
	DC	6:00 ± 40 min	11:10 ± 70 min	78.83 ± 4.19 ^b	31.32 ± 8.25 ^a
	CK	6:00 ± 40 min	11:30 ± 70 min	61.61 ± 3.21 ^c	24.27 ± 6.06 ^a
6	DF	5:50 ± 50 min	12:00 ± 70 min	58.00 ± 7.73 ^a	25.03 ± 7.39 ^b
	DC	5:50 ± 50 min	12:00 ± 70 min	69.58 ± 7.43 ^b	30.80 ± 7.65 ^b
	CK	5:50 ± 50 min	12:20 ± 60 min	55.34 ± 6.18 ^ac	24.24 ± 6.15 ^b
7	DF	7:00 ± 40 min	12:00 ± 80 min	51.55 ± 4.75 ^a	19.81 ± 6.31 ^a
	DC	7:00 ± 70 min	12:30 ± 90 min	61.70 ± 5.73 ^b	25.20 ± 5.92 ^a
	CK	7:00 ± 70 min	12:30 ± 80 min	49.98 ± 6.48 ^ac	19.38 ± 5.37 ^a
8	DF	7:20 ± 40 min	12:30 ± 70 min	38.16 ± 13.18 ^a	17.00 ± 6.51 ^a
	DC	7:20 ± 40 min	13:00 ± 60 min	47.40 ± 15.02 ^a	20.98 ± 4.96 ^a
	CK	7:20 ± 40 min	13:00 ± 70 min	41.91 ± 14.63 ^a	19.09 ± 5.32 ^a
9	DF	7:40 ± 40 min	12:20 ± 60 min	35.02 ± 9.22 ^a	13.40 ± 4.52 ^a
	DC	7:40 ± 40 min	12:50 ± 60 min	42.85 ± 9.89 ^b	16.73 ± 3.40 ^a
	CK	7:40 ± 40 min	12:50 ± 50 min	38.73 ± 9.44 ^a	15.53 ± 4.82 ^a
10	DF	9:00 ± 70 min	13:00 ± 100 min	6.55 ± 8.55 ^a	3.37 ± 2.03 ^c
	DC	9:00 ± 70 min	13:30 ± 90 min	11.27 ± 11.01 ^a	4.46 ± 1.54 ^c
	CK	9:00 ± 80 min	13:30 ± 90 min	9.67 ± 10.28 ^c	3.77 ± 1.57 ^c