Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2007, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 937-945.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0119
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
CHEN Hui-Zhe1, Natalia Ladatko2, ZHU De-Feng1, LIN Xian-Qing1, ZHANG Yu-Ping1, SUN Zong-Xiu1,*()
Received:
2006-05-08
Accepted:
2006-09-08
Online:
2007-05-08
Published:
2007-09-30
Contact:
SUN Zong-Xiu
CHEN Hui-Zhe, Natalia Ladatko, ZHU De-Feng, LIN Xian-Qing, ZHANG Yu-Ping, SUN Zong-Xiu. ABSORPTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF Na+ AND K+ IN RICE SEEDLING UNDER SALT STRESS[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2007, 31(5): 937-945.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.17521/cjpe.2007.0119
品种 Variety | 盐处理 Treatment | 苗长 Seedling length (cm) | 干重 Dry weight (mg) | 含水量 Moisture content (%) | 绿叶面积 Green leaf area (cm2) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
绿叶 Green leaf | 茎鞘 Stem and sheath | 绿叶 Green leaf | 茎鞘 Stem and sheath | ||||||||||||||
‘日本晴’ | CK | 34.5±4.0 | 67.6±4.3 | 65.6±3.7 | 74.9±0.6 | 83.7±0.4 | 19.0±4.8 | ||||||||||
Nipponbare | 5 000 mg·L-1 | 32.6±0.4 | 40.6±7.1 | 46.5±9.5 | 73.4±1.7 | 86.8±2.0 | 12.7±1.3 | ||||||||||
8 000 mg·L-1 | 32.9±1.9 | 41.4±7.0 | 48.2±6.7 | 71.7±1.4 | 85.9±0.2 | 12.3±3.0 | |||||||||||
‘AB52’ | CK | 37.2±4.5 | 75.3±9.1 | 72.9±8.9 | 74.7±1.0 | 83.4±1.0 | 23.3±5.9 | ||||||||||
5 000 mg·L-1 | 35.7±3.7 | 77.1±2.3 | 74.0±6.0 | 74.2±1.7 | 87.1±0.6 | 23.1±7.6 | |||||||||||
8 000 mg·L-1 | 35.6±2.5 | 64.2±10.3 | 71.0±6.3 | 71.9±0.3 | 86.8±0.2 | 16.0±2.7 | |||||||||||
‘02402’ | CK | 44.2±7.8 | 139.3±5.7 | 125.0±5.6 | 75.3±0.3 | 85.0±0.8 | 39.4±11.2 | ||||||||||
5 000 mg·L-1 | 41.7±3.4 | 118.5±9.9 | 104.3±4.9 | 75.0±0.9 | 86.2±0.3 | 34.4±5.6 | |||||||||||
8 000 mg·L-1 | 38.6±0.4 | 71.3±3.2 | 77.4±4.2 | 72.6±1.1 | 83.7±1.0 | 22.5±5.6 | |||||||||||
‘02435’ | CK | 39.1±3.8 | 99.2±2.5 | 88.0±2.0 | 76.3±0.8 | 86.6±1.4 | 32.3±8.1 | ||||||||||
5 000 mg·L-1 | 37.7±0.7 | 75.8±7.3 | 78.7±1.8 | 75.8±0.3 | 88.4±0.3 | 24.5±2.6 | |||||||||||
8 000 mg·L-1 | 36.6±2.2 | 58.8±11.6 | 69.5±10.2 | 73.7±0.3 | 86.8±0.4 | 16.9±3.1 |
Table 1 Effect of NaCl treatment on rice seedling growth (Mean±SD)
品种 Variety | 盐处理 Treatment | 苗长 Seedling length (cm) | 干重 Dry weight (mg) | 含水量 Moisture content (%) | 绿叶面积 Green leaf area (cm2) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
绿叶 Green leaf | 茎鞘 Stem and sheath | 绿叶 Green leaf | 茎鞘 Stem and sheath | ||||||||||||||
‘日本晴’ | CK | 34.5±4.0 | 67.6±4.3 | 65.6±3.7 | 74.9±0.6 | 83.7±0.4 | 19.0±4.8 | ||||||||||
Nipponbare | 5 000 mg·L-1 | 32.6±0.4 | 40.6±7.1 | 46.5±9.5 | 73.4±1.7 | 86.8±2.0 | 12.7±1.3 | ||||||||||
8 000 mg·L-1 | 32.9±1.9 | 41.4±7.0 | 48.2±6.7 | 71.7±1.4 | 85.9±0.2 | 12.3±3.0 | |||||||||||
‘AB52’ | CK | 37.2±4.5 | 75.3±9.1 | 72.9±8.9 | 74.7±1.0 | 83.4±1.0 | 23.3±5.9 | ||||||||||
5 000 mg·L-1 | 35.7±3.7 | 77.1±2.3 | 74.0±6.0 | 74.2±1.7 | 87.1±0.6 | 23.1±7.6 | |||||||||||
8 000 mg·L-1 | 35.6±2.5 | 64.2±10.3 | 71.0±6.3 | 71.9±0.3 | 86.8±0.2 | 16.0±2.7 | |||||||||||
‘02402’ | CK | 44.2±7.8 | 139.3±5.7 | 125.0±5.6 | 75.3±0.3 | 85.0±0.8 | 39.4±11.2 | ||||||||||
5 000 mg·L-1 | 41.7±3.4 | 118.5±9.9 | 104.3±4.9 | 75.0±0.9 | 86.2±0.3 | 34.4±5.6 | |||||||||||
8 000 mg·L-1 | 38.6±0.4 | 71.3±3.2 | 77.4±4.2 | 72.6±1.1 | 83.7±1.0 | 22.5±5.6 | |||||||||||
‘02435’ | CK | 39.1±3.8 | 99.2±2.5 | 88.0±2.0 | 76.3±0.8 | 86.6±1.4 | 32.3±8.1 | ||||||||||
5 000 mg·L-1 | 37.7±0.7 | 75.8±7.3 | 78.7±1.8 | 75.8±0.3 | 88.4±0.3 | 24.5±2.6 | |||||||||||
8 000 mg·L-1 | 36.6±2.2 | 58.8±11.6 | 69.5±10.2 | 73.7±0.3 | 86.8±0.4 | 16.9±3.1 |
品种 Variety | 盐处理 Treatment | 总叶数 Total leaves (平均值±标准偏差) (Mean±SD) | 枯叶数 Dried leaf (平均值±标准偏差) (Mean±SD) | 相对枯叶数率 Relative dried leaf rate (%) | 绿叶干重 Green leaf DW (mg) | 枯叶干重 Dried leaf DW (mg) | 相对枯叶干重率 Relative dried leaf DW rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘日本晴’ | CK | 5.3±0.3 | 0.9±0.04 | 0 | 67.6 | 2.1C | 0 |
Nipponbare | 5 000 mg·L-1 | 4.9±0.1 | 2.4±0.12 | 31.1 | 40.6 | 10.3B | 17.2 |
8 000 mg·L-1 | 5.1±0.2 | 3.0±0.03 | 41.2 | 41.4 | 15.2A | 23.9 | |
‘AB52’ | CK | 4.7±0.1 | 1.3±0.05 | 0 | 75.3 | 4.8B | 0 |
5 000 mg·L-1 | 4.7±0.2 | 2.0±0.29 | 15.9 | 77.1 | 17.2A | 12.3 | |
8 000 mg·L-1 | 4.7±0.1 | 2.8±0.26 | 32.0 | 64.2 | 24.9A | 22.0 | |
‘02402’ | CK | 5.3±0.5 | 0.8±0.16 | 0 | 139.3 | 2.8C | 0 |
5 000 mg·L-1 | 4.9±0.2 | 1.6±0.17 | 17.1 | 118.5 | 15.0B | 9.2 | |
8 000 mg·L-1 | 4.2±0.1 | 2.2±0.13 | 35.1 | 71.3 | 22.7A | 22.2 | |
‘02435’ | CK | 5.1±0.5 | 0.9±0.08 | 0 | 99.2 | 1.8C | 0 |
5 000 mg·L-1 | 5.0±0.0 | 2.4±0.07 | 29.0 | 75.8 | 15.0B | 14.8 | |
8 000 mg·L-1 | 4.6±0.3 | 2.7±0.03 | 39.3 | 58.8 | 20.3A | 23.9 |
Table 2 Damage degree of NaCl treatment on rice leaves
品种 Variety | 盐处理 Treatment | 总叶数 Total leaves (平均值±标准偏差) (Mean±SD) | 枯叶数 Dried leaf (平均值±标准偏差) (Mean±SD) | 相对枯叶数率 Relative dried leaf rate (%) | 绿叶干重 Green leaf DW (mg) | 枯叶干重 Dried leaf DW (mg) | 相对枯叶干重率 Relative dried leaf DW rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘日本晴’ | CK | 5.3±0.3 | 0.9±0.04 | 0 | 67.6 | 2.1C | 0 |
Nipponbare | 5 000 mg·L-1 | 4.9±0.1 | 2.4±0.12 | 31.1 | 40.6 | 10.3B | 17.2 |
8 000 mg·L-1 | 5.1±0.2 | 3.0±0.03 | 41.2 | 41.4 | 15.2A | 23.9 | |
‘AB52’ | CK | 4.7±0.1 | 1.3±0.05 | 0 | 75.3 | 4.8B | 0 |
5 000 mg·L-1 | 4.7±0.2 | 2.0±0.29 | 15.9 | 77.1 | 17.2A | 12.3 | |
8 000 mg·L-1 | 4.7±0.1 | 2.8±0.26 | 32.0 | 64.2 | 24.9A | 22.0 | |
‘02402’ | CK | 5.3±0.5 | 0.8±0.16 | 0 | 139.3 | 2.8C | 0 |
5 000 mg·L-1 | 4.9±0.2 | 1.6±0.17 | 17.1 | 118.5 | 15.0B | 9.2 | |
8 000 mg·L-1 | 4.2±0.1 | 2.2±0.13 | 35.1 | 71.3 | 22.7A | 22.2 | |
‘02435’ | CK | 5.1±0.5 | 0.9±0.08 | 0 | 99.2 | 1.8C | 0 |
5 000 mg·L-1 | 5.0±0.0 | 2.4±0.07 | 29.0 | 75.8 | 15.0B | 14.8 | |
8 000 mg·L-1 | 4.6±0.3 | 2.7±0.03 | 39.3 | 58.8 | 20.3A | 23.9 |
品种 Variety | 盐处理 Treatment | 绿叶 Green leaf | 茎鞘 Stem and sheath | 枯叶 Dried leaf | 根 Root |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘日本晴’ | CK | 136.8bB | 255.2bB | 860.0cA | 646.6cB |
Nipponbare | 5 000 mg·L-1 | 2 595.0aA | 4 356.0aA | 5 197.1aA | 2 445.7bA |
8 000 mg·L-1 | 2 519.1aA | 4 913.5aA | 4 382.7 bB | 3 032.3aA | |
‘AB52’ | CK | 98.7cB | 307.8 bB | 365.1 bB | 471.1cB |
5 000 mg·L-1 | 2 039.8bA | 4 555.5aA | 6 225.7aA | 2 243.6bA | |
8 000 mg·L-1 | 2 516.2aA | 4 503.2aA | 6 052.3aA | 2 637.2aA | |
‘02402’ | CK | 173.0cB | 213.3cC | 983.0bB | 542.4bB |
5 000 mg·L-1 | 1 679.7bA | 2 716.0bB | 3 450.5aAB | 2 773.0aA | |
8 000 mg·L-1 | 2 286.0aA | 4 940.8aA | 5 413.6aA | 2 974.4aA | |
‘02435’ | CK | 98.6cC | 232.8cC | 658.2cB | 515.6cC |
5 000 mg·L-1 | 1 954.3bB | 4 191.0bB | 5 042.8bA | 2 365.7bB | |
8 000 mg·L-1 | 2 447.4aA | 5 977.5aA | 5 883.3aA | 2 904.0aA |
Table 3 Contents of Na+ in different organs of rice seedling (mg·kg-1)
品种 Variety | 盐处理 Treatment | 绿叶 Green leaf | 茎鞘 Stem and sheath | 枯叶 Dried leaf | 根 Root |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘日本晴’ | CK | 136.8bB | 255.2bB | 860.0cA | 646.6cB |
Nipponbare | 5 000 mg·L-1 | 2 595.0aA | 4 356.0aA | 5 197.1aA | 2 445.7bA |
8 000 mg·L-1 | 2 519.1aA | 4 913.5aA | 4 382.7 bB | 3 032.3aA | |
‘AB52’ | CK | 98.7cB | 307.8 bB | 365.1 bB | 471.1cB |
5 000 mg·L-1 | 2 039.8bA | 4 555.5aA | 6 225.7aA | 2 243.6bA | |
8 000 mg·L-1 | 2 516.2aA | 4 503.2aA | 6 052.3aA | 2 637.2aA | |
‘02402’ | CK | 173.0cB | 213.3cC | 983.0bB | 542.4bB |
5 000 mg·L-1 | 1 679.7bA | 2 716.0bB | 3 450.5aAB | 2 773.0aA | |
8 000 mg·L-1 | 2 286.0aA | 4 940.8aA | 5 413.6aA | 2 974.4aA | |
‘02435’ | CK | 98.6cC | 232.8cC | 658.2cB | 515.6cC |
5 000 mg·L-1 | 1 954.3bB | 4 191.0bB | 5 042.8bA | 2 365.7bB | |
8 000 mg·L-1 | 2 447.4aA | 5 977.5aA | 5 883.3aA | 2 904.0aA |
品种 Variety | 盐处理 Treatment | 绿叶 Green leaf | 茎鞘 Stem and sheath | 枯叶 Dried leaf | 根 Root |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘日本晴’ | CK | 11 478.1aA | 15 785.0aA | 6 380.5aA | 10 376.3aA |
Nipponbare | 5 000 mg·L-1 | 11 170.6aA | 9 532.5bB | 9 271.7aA | 6 118.2bB |
8 000 mg·L-1 | 12 188.5aA | 8 157.5bB | 10 269.4aA | 5 357.4bB | |
‘AB52’ | CK | 12 145.0 abA | 16 585.0aA | 5 804.7cC | 9 451.8aA |
5 000 mg·L-1 | 10 557.5bA | 10 855.0bB | 9 873.5bB | 6 652.0 aAB | |
8 000 mg·L-1 | 12 818.9aA | 8 696.9bB | 12 624.1aA | 5 218.0bB | |
‘02402’ | CK | 11 815.5aA | 17 602.5aA | 4 464.2bA | 11 146.6aA |
5 000 mg·L-1 | 10 627.1aA | 12 522.5bB | 4 143.3bA | 7 212.2bB | |
8 000 mg·L-1 | 10 545.2aA | 8 255.0cC | 9 702.3aA | 6 086.7bB | |
‘02435’ | CK | 11 955.0aA | 18 230.0aA | 7 383.5cC | 11 022.1aA |
5 000 mg·L-1 | 10 982.5bA | 11 255.0bB | 8 576.3bB | 5 975.9bB | |
8 000 mg·L-1 | 11 866.9aA | 8 655.0cC | 13 574.0aA | 5007.3cB |
Table 4 Contents of K+ in different organs of rice seedling (mg·kg-1)
品种 Variety | 盐处理 Treatment | 绿叶 Green leaf | 茎鞘 Stem and sheath | 枯叶 Dried leaf | 根 Root |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘日本晴’ | CK | 11 478.1aA | 15 785.0aA | 6 380.5aA | 10 376.3aA |
Nipponbare | 5 000 mg·L-1 | 11 170.6aA | 9 532.5bB | 9 271.7aA | 6 118.2bB |
8 000 mg·L-1 | 12 188.5aA | 8 157.5bB | 10 269.4aA | 5 357.4bB | |
‘AB52’ | CK | 12 145.0 abA | 16 585.0aA | 5 804.7cC | 9 451.8aA |
5 000 mg·L-1 | 10 557.5bA | 10 855.0bB | 9 873.5bB | 6 652.0 aAB | |
8 000 mg·L-1 | 12 818.9aA | 8 696.9bB | 12 624.1aA | 5 218.0bB | |
‘02402’ | CK | 11 815.5aA | 17 602.5aA | 4 464.2bA | 11 146.6aA |
5 000 mg·L-1 | 10 627.1aA | 12 522.5bB | 4 143.3bA | 7 212.2bB | |
8 000 mg·L-1 | 10 545.2aA | 8 255.0cC | 9 702.3aA | 6 086.7bB | |
‘02435’ | CK | 11 955.0aA | 18 230.0aA | 7 383.5cC | 11 022.1aA |
5 000 mg·L-1 | 10 982.5bA | 11 255.0bB | 8 576.3bB | 5 975.9bB | |
8 000 mg·L-1 | 11 866.9aA | 8 655.0cC | 13 574.0aA | 5007.3cB |
盐处理 Treatment | 品种 Variety | 绿叶 Green leaf | 茎鞘 Stem and sheath | 枯叶 Dried leaf | 根 Root |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | ‘日本晴’‘Nipponbare’ | 84.77 abA | 62.45aA | 8.48bcAB | 16.24bB |
‘AB52’ | 125.27aA | 57.87aA | 15.98aA | 20.00aA | |
‘02402’ | 68.29bA | 83.24aA | 4.46cB | 20.55aA | |
‘02435’ | 124.40aA | 79.71aA | 11.28abAB | 21.40aA | |
5 000 mg·L-1 | ‘日本晴’‘Nipponbare’ | 4.97aA | 2.28bB | 1.81aA | 2.50aA |
‘AB52’ | 5.31aA | 2.54bB | 1.61aAB | 3.01aA | |
‘02402’ | 6.63aA | 4.67aA | 1.21bB | 2.65aA | |
‘02435’ | 5.62aA | 2.69bB | 1.70aAB | 2.54aA | |
8 000 mg·L-1 | ‘日本晴’‘Nipponbare’ | 4.86aA | 1.66aA | 2.36aA | 1.77bcA |
‘AB52’ | 5.09aA | 1.93aA | 2.09bAB | 1.98abA | |
‘02402’ | 4.68aA | 1.76aA | 1.78bB | 2.04aA | |
‘02435’ | 4.85aA | 1.46aA | 2.31aA1.72 c A |
Table 5 Content ratio of K+ to Na+ in different organ of rice seedling
盐处理 Treatment | 品种 Variety | 绿叶 Green leaf | 茎鞘 Stem and sheath | 枯叶 Dried leaf | 根 Root |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | ‘日本晴’‘Nipponbare’ | 84.77 abA | 62.45aA | 8.48bcAB | 16.24bB |
‘AB52’ | 125.27aA | 57.87aA | 15.98aA | 20.00aA | |
‘02402’ | 68.29bA | 83.24aA | 4.46cB | 20.55aA | |
‘02435’ | 124.40aA | 79.71aA | 11.28abAB | 21.40aA | |
5 000 mg·L-1 | ‘日本晴’‘Nipponbare’ | 4.97aA | 2.28bB | 1.81aA | 2.50aA |
‘AB52’ | 5.31aA | 2.54bB | 1.61aAB | 3.01aA | |
‘02402’ | 6.63aA | 4.67aA | 1.21bB | 2.65aA | |
‘02435’ | 5.62aA | 2.69bB | 1.70aAB | 2.54aA | |
8 000 mg·L-1 | ‘日本晴’‘Nipponbare’ | 4.86aA | 1.66aA | 2.36aA | 1.77bcA |
‘AB52’ | 5.09aA | 1.93aA | 2.09bAB | 1.98abA | |
‘02402’ | 4.68aA | 1.76aA | 1.78bB | 2.04aA | |
‘02435’ | 4.85aA | 1.46aA | 2.31aA1.72 c A |
[1] | Akita S, Cabuslay GS (1990). Physiological basis of differential response to salinity in rice cultivars. Plant and Soil, 123,277-294. |
[2] | Basu S, Gangopadhyay G, Mukherjee BB (2002). Salt tolerance in rice in vitro: implication of accumulation of Na, K and proline. Plant Cell, Tissue, and Organ Culture, 69,55-64. |
[3] | Chen DM (陈德明), Yu RP (俞仁培) (1998). Salt-resistance and ionic characteristics of three wheat varieties under salt stress. Acta Pedologica Sinica (土壤学报), 35,88-94. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[4] | Chinnusamy V, Jagendorf A, Zhu JK (2005). Understanding and improving salt tolerance in plants. Crop Science, 45,437-448. |
[5] | Laurie S, Feeney KA, Maathuis FJM, Heard PJ, Brown SJ, Leigh RA (2002). A role for HKT1 in sodium uptake by wheat roots. The Plant Journal : for Cell and Molecular Biology, 32,39-149. |
[6] |
Lin HX, Zhu MZ, Yano M, Gao JP, Liang ZW, Su WA, Hu XH, Ren ZH, Chao DY (2004). QTLs for Na+ and K+ uptake of the shoots and roots controlling rice salt tolerance. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 108,253-260.
URL PMID |
[7] | Maathuis FJM, Amtmann A (1999). K+ nutrition and Na+ toxicity: the basis of cellular K+/Na+ ratios. Annals of Botany, 84,123-133. |
[8] | Munns R, Termaat A (1986). Whole plant responses to salinity. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 13,143-160. |
[9] | Qiu SP (邱生平), Zhou GA (周国安), Lu JF (陆驹飞), Huang J (黄骥), Pan LJ (潘丽娟), Wang JF (王建飞), Yang Q (杨清), Zhang HS (张红生) (2006). Molecular cloning and expression analysis of a new vacuolar Na+/H + antiporter gene in rice (Oryza sativa). Chinese Journal of Rice Science (中国水稻科学), 20,119-124. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[10] |
Ren ZH, Gao JP, Li LG, Cai XL, Huang W, Chao DY, Zhu MZ, Wang ZY, Luan S, Lin HX (2005). A rice quantitative trait locus for salt tolerance encodes a sodium transporter. Nature Genetics, 37,1141-1146.
URL PMID |
[11] | Sun XF (孙小芳), Liu YL (刘友良) (2000). Distribution of Na+ and K+ in cotton plant under NaCl stress and salt tolerance. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica (西北植物学报), 20,1027-1033. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[12] |
Tester M, Davenport RJ (2003). Na+ tolerance and Na+ transport in higher plants. Annals of Botany, 91,503-527.
URL PMID |
[13] | Uozumi N, Kim EJ, Rubio F, Yamaguchi T, Mutos S, Tsuboi A, Bakker EP, Nakamura T, Schroeder JI (2000). The Arabidopsis HKT1 gene homolog mediates inward Na+ currents in Xenopus laevis oocytes and Na+ uptake in saccharomyces cerevisiae. Plant Physiology, 122,1249-1259. |
[14] |
Wu SJ, Ding L, Zhu JK (1996). SOS1, a genetic locus essential for salt tolerance and potassium acquisition. Plant Cell, 8,617-627.
DOI URL PMID |
[15] | Yan B (晏斌), Dai QJ (戴秋杰) (1994). Effect of external K+ level on salt tolerance of rice seedlings. Chinese Journal of Rice Science (中国水稻科学), 8,119-122. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[16] | Yan B (晏斌), Wang ZL (汪宗立) (1992). Absorption of sodium ion and function of plasma membrane ATPase in roots of two rice varieties under salt stress. Chinese Journal of Rice Science (中国水稻科学), 6,29-34. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[17] | Yan B (晏斌), Wang ZL (汪宗立) (1994). Sodium ion distribution in rice seedling and varietal salt tolerance. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences (江苏农业学报), 10(1),1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[18] | Yan XL (严小龙), Zheng SL (郑少玲), Lian ZH (连兆煌) (1992). Studies on the mechanisms of salt tolerance in rice. Ⅰ. Comparisons of whote-plant salt tolerance among different genotypes. Journal of South China Agricultural University (华南农业大学学报), 13(4),19-24. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[19] | Yang XY (杨晓英), Zhang WH (章文华), Wang QY (王庆亚), Liu YL (刘友良) (2003). Salt tolerance of wild soybeans in Jiangsu and its relation with ionic distribution and selective transportation. Chinese Joural of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 14,2237-2240. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[20] | Yeo AR, Flowers TJ (1983). Varietal differences in the toxicity of sedium ion in rice leaves. Physiologia Plantarum, 59,189-195. |
[21] | Yeo AR, Flowers TJ (1986). Salinity resistance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) and a pyramiding approach to breeding varieties for saline soil. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 13,161-173. |
[22] |
Zhu JK (2003). Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 6,441-445.
URL PMID |
[1] | Sheng YANG, Hua-Xin ZHANG, Qiu-Xia CHEN, Xiu-Yan YANG. Responses of apical ion fluxes to NaCl stress in Elaeagnus angustifolia seedlings [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2017, 41(4): 489-496. |
[2] | Qing-Xian KONG, Jiang-Bao XIA, Zi-Guo ZHAO, Fan-Zhu QU. Effects of groundwater salinity on the characteristics of leaf photosynthesis and stem sap flow in Tamarix chinensis [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2016, 40(12): 1298-1309. |
[3] | GUO Rui,LI Feng,ZHOU Ji,LI Hao-Ru,XIA Xu,LIU Qi. Eco-physiological responses of linseed (Linum usitatissimum) to salt and alkali stresses [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2016, 40(1): 69-79. |
[4] | MENG De-Yun,HOU Lin-Lin,YANG Sha,MENG Jing-Jing,GUO Feng,LI Xin-Guo,WAN Shu-Bo. Exogenous polyamines alleviating salt stress on peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) grown in pots [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2015, 39(12): 1209-1215. |
[5] | HU Chu-Qi,LIU Jin-Ke,WANG Tian-Hong,WANG Wen-Lin,LU Shan,ZHOU Chang-Fang. Influence of three types of salt stress on photosynthesis in Spartina alterniflora and Phragmites australis [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2015, 39(1): 92-103. |
[6] | SAYRAN• Waley,LI Bing-Bai,ZHANG Jia-Hua,YANG Shen-Bin. Application of a rice simulation model in high temperature sensitivity study [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2014, 38(5): 515-528. |
[7] | LU Jia-Hui, L Xin, LIANG Yong-Chao, LIN Hai-Rong. Salt tolerance of Glycyrrhiza inflata seedlings in Xinjiang and its ion response to salt stress [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2013, 37(9): 839-850. |
[8] | LÜ Jin-Hui,REN Lei,LI Yan-Feng,WANG Xuan,ZHAO Xia-Lu,ZHANG Chun-Lai. Responses to salt stress among different genotypes of tea Chrysanthemum [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2013, 37(7): 656-664. |
[9] | CHEN Jian,LI Ni-Ya,LIU Qiang,ZHONG Cai-Rong,HUANG Min,ZENG Jia. Antioxidant defense and photosynthesis for non-indigenous mangrove species Sonneratia apetala and Laguncularia racemosa under NaCl stress [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2013, 37(5): 443-453. |
[10] | CI Dun-Wei,DAI Liang-Xiang,SONG Wen-Wu,ZHANG Zhi-Meng. Genotypic differences in salt tolerance from germination to seedling stage in peanut [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2013, 37(11): 1018-1027. |
[11] | ZOU Yuan-Yuan, LIU Lin, LIU Yang, ZHAO Liang, DENG Qi-Yun, WU Jun, ZHUANG Wen, SONG Wei. Diversity of indigenous bacterial communities in Oryza sativa seeds of different varieties [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2012, 36(8): 880-890. |
[12] | WEI Ming,LIAO Xue-Qun,LI Dong-Xia,DUAN Hai-Long. Comparison of tillering productivity among nodes along the mian stem of rice [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2012, 36(4): 324-332. |
[13] | SONG Xu-Li, HU Chun-Mei, MENG Jing-Jing, HOU Xi-Lin, HE Qi-Wei, LI Xin-Guo. NaCl stress aggravates photoinhibition of photosystem II and photosystem I in Capsicum annuum leaves under high irradiance stress [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2011, 35(6): 681-686. |
[14] | GU Dong-Xiang, TANG Liang, XU Qi-Jun, LEI Xiao-Jun, CAO Wei-Xing, ZHU Yan. Root growth and distribution in rice cultivars as affected by nitrogen and water supply [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2011, 35(5): 558-566. |
[15] | CHEN Jie, TANG Liang, LIU Xiao-Jun, CAO Wei-Xing, ZHU Yan. Modeling rice grain starch accumulation based on plant carbon flow [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2011, 35(4): 431-440. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn