植物生态学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7): 741-751.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2018.0097
李豆豆1,*,席本野1,*,王斐2,贾素苹3,赵洪林4,贺曰林1,刘洋1,贾黎明1,*()
出版日期:
2018-07-20
发布日期:
2018-06-11
通讯作者:
李豆豆,席本野,贾黎明
基金资助:
LI Dou-Dou1,*, XI Ben-Ye1,*, WANG Fei2, JIA Su-Ping3, ZHAO Hong-Lin4, HE Yue-Lin1, LIU Yang1, JIA Li-Ming1,**()
Online:
2018-07-20
Published:
2018-06-11
Contact:
Dou-Dou LI,Ben-Ye XI,Li-Ming JIA
Supported by:
摘要:
明确毛白杨叶片膨压变化规律及其对环境因子的响应, 可以为以叶片膨压作为水分亏缺指标指导灌溉提供理论依据。该研究以滴灌条件下的二年生毛白杨(Populus tomentosa)人工林为研究对象, 对充分灌溉(FI)和控水灌溉(CK)的叶片磁力探针压力输出值(Pp)进行了连续监测, 并同步监测了土壤温度(Ts)、土壤水势(Ψs)、液流速率(VSF)和气象因子, 探讨了不同水分处理下毛白杨叶片膨压变化规律及其与环境因子的关系。结果表明: 1)不同天气条件下的Pp均呈明显的“昼高夜低”变化规律, 且晴天的峰值宽度最大; 2)标准化相对叶片膨压(ΔPp)与VSF在不同天气条件下均呈正相关关系, 都可用二项式函数描述, 决定系数(R 2)从大到小依次是: 晴天(R 2 = 0.87) >阴天(R 2 = 0.72) >雨天(R 2 = 0.31); 3)影响Pp变化的环境因子主要是光合有效辐射(PAR)、空气温度(Ta)、空气相对湿度(RH)以及饱和水汽压差(VPD), 其中PAR与Pp协同变化最一致; 4) ΔPp对不同环境因子均存在时滞效应, 且不同水分处理的时滞圈大小不同; 5)不同水分处理的Pp曲线形状有明显差异。综上所述, 毛白杨叶片膨压变化规律与环境因子关系密切, 且与晴天液流速率存在高度的协同变化, 有作为水分亏缺诊断指标的潜力。
李豆豆, 席本野, 王斐, 贾素苹, 赵洪林, 贺曰林, 刘洋, 贾黎明. 毛白杨叶片膨压变化规律及其对环境因子的响应. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(7): 741-751. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2018.0097
LI Dou-Dou, XI Ben-Ye, WANG Fei, JIA Su-Ping, ZHAO Hong-Lin, HE Yue-Lin, LIU Yang, JIA Li-Ming. Patterns of variations in leaf turgor pressure and responses to environmental factors in Populus tomentosa. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2018, 42(7): 741-751. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2018.0097
土壤深度 Soil depth (cm) | 颗粒组成 Particle size distribution (%) | 质地1) Texture1) | 容重 Bulk density (g?cm-3) | 田间持水量 Field water- holding capacity (cm3·cm-3) | 饱和含水量 Saturated water content (cm3·cm-3) | 有机质 Organic matter (g·kg-1) | 速效磷 Available phosphorus (mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available potassium (mg·kg-1) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
砂粒 Sand | 粉粒 Silt | 黏粒 Clay | ||||||||
0-50 | 61.79 | 35.52 | 2.70 | 砂壤土 Sandy loam | 1.41 | 0.34 | 0.44 | 4.7 | 7.26 | 44.42 |
50-140 | 63.92 | 33.69 | 2.39 | 砂壤土 Sandy loam | 1.43 | 0.36 | 0.45 | 2.3 | 0.97 | 27.85 |
140-300 | 29.62 | 65.54 | 4.84 | 粉壤土 Silt loam | 1.46 | 0.35 | 0.44 | 2.6 | 1.63 | 41.98 |
表1 试验地土壤基本物理和化学性质
Table 1 Basic physical and chemical characteristics of the soil at the experimental site
土壤深度 Soil depth (cm) | 颗粒组成 Particle size distribution (%) | 质地1) Texture1) | 容重 Bulk density (g?cm-3) | 田间持水量 Field water- holding capacity (cm3·cm-3) | 饱和含水量 Saturated water content (cm3·cm-3) | 有机质 Organic matter (g·kg-1) | 速效磷 Available phosphorus (mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available potassium (mg·kg-1) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
砂粒 Sand | 粉粒 Silt | 黏粒 Clay | ||||||||
0-50 | 61.79 | 35.52 | 2.70 | 砂壤土 Sandy loam | 1.41 | 0.34 | 0.44 | 4.7 | 7.26 | 44.42 |
50-140 | 63.92 | 33.69 | 2.39 | 砂壤土 Sandy loam | 1.43 | 0.36 | 0.45 | 2.3 | 0.97 | 27.85 |
140-300 | 29.62 | 65.54 | 4.84 | 粉壤土 Silt loam | 1.46 | 0.35 | 0.44 | 2.6 | 1.63 | 41.98 |
图1 ZIM-探针构造和工作原理图。Pc, 植物叶片膨压; Pclamp, 两个磁体施加于植物叶片上的压力; Pp, Pc和Pclamp二者的压力差。
Fig. 1 Diagram of ZIM-probe structure and working principle. Pc, the turgor in the leaf patch; Pclamp, the pressure by the magnets on the leaf patch; Pp , the pressure of difference between Pc and Pclamp.
图2 充分灌溉(FI)和控水灌溉(CK)处理滴头正下方20 cm深处土壤水势动态变化。
Fig. 2 Variations of soil water potential at 20 cm depth and 0 cm distance from a dripper in treatments of full irrigation (FI) and control (CK).
图3 相对叶片膨压(Pp)与环境因子的日变化。I-1, 2, 3和II-1, 2, 3分别代表充分灌溉(FI)处理第一和第二株样树上的各3个ZIM-探针。
Fig. 3 Diurnal changes of leaf patch clamp pressure (Pp) and environmental factors. I-1, 2, 3 and II-1, 2, 3 represent 3 ZIM-probes on leaves of the 1st and 2nd sample trees in the full irrigation (FI) treatment, respectively.
图4 不同天气条件充分灌溉处理下相对叶片膨压(Pp)与液流速率(VSF)的关系。
Fig. 4 Diurnal changes in leaf patch clamp pressure (Pp) and sap flow velocity (VSF) under different weather conditions in the full irrigation (FI) treatment.
图5 标准化相对叶片膨压(ΔPp)与环境因子的相关性分析。充分灌溉处理6月1-12号每小时的平均ΔPp。
Fig. 5 Correlation analysis between normalized leaf patch clamp pressure (ΔPp) and environmental factors. Hourly average ΔPp from June 1st to 12th in the full irrigation (FI) treatment.
环境因子 Environmental factors | 光合有效辐射 Photosynthetically active radiation | 空气温度 Air temperature | 风速 Wind speed | 空气相对湿度 Relative air humidity | 饱和水气压差 Vapor pressure deficiency | 土壤温度 Soil temperature |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
相关系数 Correlation coefficient | -0.080 | 0.066 | 0.313 | -0.332 | 0.236 | 0.287 |
显著性水平 Sig. | 0.804 | 0.838 | 0.321 | 0.291 | 0.461 | 0.365 |
表2 日均标准化相对叶片膨压(ΔPp)与环境因子相关性分析表
Table 2 Correlation analysis between daily normalized leaf patch clamp pressure (ΔPp) and environmental factors
环境因子 Environmental factors | 光合有效辐射 Photosynthetically active radiation | 空气温度 Air temperature | 风速 Wind speed | 空气相对湿度 Relative air humidity | 饱和水气压差 Vapor pressure deficiency | 土壤温度 Soil temperature |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
相关系数 Correlation coefficient | -0.080 | 0.066 | 0.313 | -0.332 | 0.236 | 0.287 |
显著性水平 Sig. | 0.804 | 0.838 | 0.321 | 0.291 | 0.461 | 0.365 |
图6 不同水分处理下相对叶片膨压(Pp)曲线的变化特征。图中红色箭头表示当天充分灌溉(FI)处理灌溉, 灰色柱形表示黑夜(18:00-6:00), 红色矩形选中的为两处理峰值差异明显的6月10-12日。
Fig. 6 Variations in leaf patch clamp pressure (Pp) curves under different water treatments. The red arrow shows irrigation in the full irrigation (FI) treatment; nocturnal hours (18:00-6:00) are marked by grey columns, and the period of June 10th-12th is marked by red rectangle when significant difference of Pp peaks occurs between the full irrigation (FI) and control (CK) treatments.
图7 标准化相对叶片膨压(ΔPp)与环境因子时滞效应。充分灌溉和对照处理6月1-12号每小时的平均ΔPp。
Fig. 7 Hysteresis between normalized leaf patch clamp pressure (ΔPp) and environmental factors. Hourly average ΔPp from June 1st to 12th in full irrigation (FI) and control (CK) treatments, respectively.
[1] |
Bai XF, Bu QM, Tan YQ, Zhu JJ ( 2012). Comparison and analysis of four methods used in measuring the plant water potential. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 48(12), 128-133.
DOI URL |
[ 柏新富, 卜庆梅, 谭永芹, 朱建军 ( 2012). 植物4种水势测定方法的比较及可靠性分析. 林业科学, 48(12), 128-133.]
DOI URL |
|
[2] | Ballester C, Castiella M, Zimmermann U, Ruüger S, Martínez Gimeno MA, Intrigliolo DS ( 2017). Usefulness of the ZIM-probe technology for detecting water stress in clementine and persimmon trees. Acta Horticulturae, 1150, 105-112. |
[3] | Benkert R, Zhu JJ, Zimmermann G, Tiirk R, Bentrup FW, Zimmermann U ( 1995). Long-term xylem pressure measurements in the liana Tetrastigma voinierianum by means of the xylem pressure probe. Planta, 196, 804-813. |
[4] |
Bramley H, Ehrenberger W, Zimmermann U, Palta JA, Ruüger S, Siddique KHM ( 2013). Non-invasive pressure probes magnetically clamped to leaves to monitor the water status of wheat. Plant and Soil, 369, 257-268.
DOI |
[5] |
Chehab H, Tekaya M, Mechri B, Jemai A, Guiaa M, Mahjoub Z, Boujnah D, Laamari S, Chihaoui B, Zakhama H, Hammami M, Giudice TD ( 2017). Effect of the Super Absorbent Polymer Stockosorb? on leaf turgor pressure, tree performance and oil quality of olive trees cv. Chemlali grown under field conditions in an arid region of Tunisia. Agricultural Water Management, 192, 221-231.
DOI URL |
[6] |
Dong W, Qin J, Li J, Zhao Y, Nie L, Zhang Z ( 2011). Interactions between soil water content and fertilizer on growth characteristics and biomass yield of Chinese white poplar (Populus tomentosa Carr.) seedlings. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 57, 303-312.
DOI URL |
[7] |
Fernández JE ( 2014). Plant-based sensing to monitor water stress: Applicability to commercial orchards. Agricultural Water Management, 142, 99-109.
DOI URL |
[8] |
Fernández JE, Rodriguez-Dominguez CM, Perez-Martin A, Zimmermann U, Ruüger S, Marti?n-Palomo MJ, Torres-Ruiz JM, Cuevas MV, Sann C, Ehrenberger W, Diaz-Espejo A ( 2011). Online-monitoring of tree water stress in a hedgerow olive orchard using the leaf patch clamp pressure probe. Agricultural Water Management, 100, 25-35.
DOI |
[9] |
Hogg EH, Barr AG, Black TA ( 2013). A simple soil moisture index for representing multi-year drought impacts on aspen productivity in the western Canadian interior. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 178, 173-182.
DOI URL |
[10] |
Jia LM, Xing CS, Wei YK, Li YA, Yang L ( 2004). The growth and photosynthesis of poplar trees in fast-growing and high-yield plantations with subterranean drip irrigation. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 40(2), 61-67.
DOI URL |
[ 贾黎明, 邢长山, 韦艳葵, 李延安, 杨丽 ( 2004). 地下滴灌条件下杨树速生丰产林生长与光合特性. 林业科学, 40(2), 61-67.]
DOI URL |
|
[11] | Jing JH, Xiao QD ( 1986). Determination of water potential by thermocouple psychrometers. Plant Physiology Communications, ( 1), 53-55. |
[ 荆家海, 肖庆德 ( 1986). 利用热电偶湿度计测定水势. 植物生理学报, ( 1), 53-55.] | |
[12] |
Johnson DM, Mcculloh KA, Meinzer FC, Woodruff DR, Eissenstat DM ( 2011). Hydraulic patterns and safety margins, from stem to stomata, in three eastern U.S. tree species. Tree Physiology, 31, 659-668.
DOI URL PMID |
[13] |
Jones HG ( 2004). Irrigation scheduling: Advantages and pitfalls of plant-based methods. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55, 2427-2436.
DOI URL PMID |
[14] |
Li GD, Fu FZ, Xi BY, Wang Y, Jia LM ( 2016). Study of transpiration and water consumption of triploid Populus tomentosa at individual tree and stand scales by using thermal dissipation technology. Acta Ecologica Sinica , 36, 2945-2953.
DOI URL |
[ 李广德, 富丰珍, 席本野, 王烨, 贾黎明 ( 2016). 基于热扩散技术的三倍体毛白杨单木及林分蒸腾耗水研究. 生态学报, 36, 2945-2953.]
DOI URL |
|
[15] | Li JS, Li YF, Wang J, Wang Z, Zhao WX ( 2016). Microirrigation in China: History, current situation and prospects. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 47, 372-381. |
[ 李久生, 栗岩峰, 王军, 王珍, 赵伟霞 ( 2016). 微灌在中国: 历史、现状和未来. 水利学报, 47, 372-381.] | |
[16] |
Martinez EM, Cancela JJ, Cuesta TS, Neira XX ( 2011). Use of psychrometers in field measurements of plant material: Accuracy and handling difficulties. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 9, 313-328.
DOI URL |
[17] |
Martínez-Gimeno MA, Castiella M, Rüger S, Intrigliolo DS, Ballester C ( 2017). Evaluating the usefulness of continuous leaf turgor pressure measurements for the assessment of persimmon tree water status. Irrigation Science, 35, 159-167.
DOI URL |
[18] |
Mengel K, Arneke WW ( 1982). Effect of potassium on the water potential, the pressure potential, the osmotic potential and cell elongation in leaves of Phaseolus vulgaris. Physiologia Plantarum, 54, 402-408.
DOI URL |
[19] |
Moriana A, Pérez-López D, Prieto MH, Ramírez-Santa-Pau M, Pérez-Rodriguez JM ( 2012). Midday stem water potential as a useful tool for estimating irrigation requirements in olive trees. Agricultural Water Management, 112, 43-54.
DOI URL |
[20] |
Navarro A, Banon S, Olmos E, Sanchezblanco MJ ( 2007). Effects of sodium chloride on water potential components, hydraulic conductivity, gas exchange and leaf ultrastructure of Arbutus unedo plants. Plant Science, 172, 473-480.
DOI URL |
[21] |
Padilla-Díaz CM, Rodriguez-Dominguez CM, Hernandez-Santana V, Perez-Martin A, Fernández JE ( 2016). Scheduling regulated deficit irrigation in a hedgerow olive orchard from leaf turgor pressure related measurements. Agricultural Water Management, 164, 28-37.
DOI URL |
[22] |
Parent B, Suard B, Serraj R, Tardieu F ( 2010). Rice leaf growth and water potential are resilient to evaporative demand and soil water deficit once the effects of root system are neutralized. Plant, Cell & Environment, 33, 1256-1267.
DOI URL PMID |
[23] |
Rodriguez-Dominguez CM, Ehrenberger W, Sann C, Ruüger S, Sukhorukov V, Martiín-Palomo MJ, Diaz-Espejo A, Cuevas MV, Torres-Ruiz JM, Perez-Martin A, Zimmermann U, Fernaández JE ( 2012). Concomitant measurements of stem sap flow and leaf turgor pressure in olive trees using the leaf patch clamp pressure probe. Agricultural Water Management, 114, 50-58.
DOI |
[24] |
Rüger S, Netzer Y, Westhoff M, Zimmermann D, Reuss R, Ovadya S, Gessner P, Zimmermann G, Schwartz A, Zimmermann U ( 2010). Remote monitoring of leaf turgor pressure of grapevines subjected to different irrigation treatments using the leaf patch clamp pressure probe. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 16, 405-412.
DOI URL |
[25] | Stöhr A, Lösch R ( 2004). Xylem sap flow and drought stress of Fraxinus excelsior saplings. Tree Physiology, 24, 169-180. |
[26] |
Wan XC, Ye Q ( 2008). Pressure probe techniques in studies of plant physiology. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 25, 497-506.
DOI URL |
[ 万贤崇, 叶清 ( 2008). 植物生理学研究中的压力探针技术. 植物学通报, 25, 497-506.]
DOI URL |
|
[27] | Wang J, Meng XZ ( 1997). Thermocouple type water potential meter. Transducer and Microsystem Technologies,( 5), 41-42. |
[ 王军, 孟祥增 ( 1997). 热电偶水势测定仪. 传感器与微系统, ( 5), 41-42.] | |
[28] |
Westhoff M, Reuss R, Zimmermann D, Netzer Y, Gessner A, Geßner P, Zimmermann G, Wegner LH, Bamberg E, Schwartz A, Zimmermann U ( 2009). A non-invasive probe for online monitoring of turgor pressure changes under field conditions. Plant Biology, 11, 701-712.
DOI PMID |
[29] |
Xi BY, Bloomberg M, Watt MS, Wang Y, Jia LM ( 2016). Modeling growth response to soil water availability simulated by HYDRUS for a mature triploid Populus tomentosa plantation located on the North China Plain. Agricultural Water Management, 176, 243-254.
DOI URL |
[30] |
Xi BY, Di N, Wang Y, Duan J, Jia LM ( 2017). Modeling stand water use response to soil water availability and groundwater level for a mature Populus tomentosa plantation located on the North China Plain. Forest Ecology and Management, 391, 63-74.
DOI URL |
[31] | Xi BY, Wang Y, Di N, Jia LM, Li GD, Huang XF, Gao YY ( 2012). Effects of soil water potential on the growth and physiological characteristics of Populus tomentosa pulpwood plantation under subsurface drip irrigation.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 32, 5318-5329. |
[ 席本野, 王烨, 邸楠, 贾黎明, 李广德, 黄祥丰, 高园园 ( 2012). 地下滴灌下土壤水势对毛白杨纸浆林生长及生理特性的影响. 生态学报, 32, 5318-5329.] | |
[32] |
Xi BY, Wang Y, Jia LM, Bloomberg M, Li GD, Di N ( 2013). Characteristics of fine root system and water uptake in a triploid Populus tomentosa plantation in the North China Plain: Implications for irrigation water management. Agricultural Water Management, 117, 83-92.
DOI URL |
[33] |
Yan XL, Xi BY, Jia LM, Li GD ( 2015). Response of sap flow to flooding in plantations of irrigated and non-irrigated triploid poplar. Journal of Forest Research, 20, 375-385.
DOI URL |
[34] |
Zhao CY, Si JH, Feng Q, Yu TF, Li W ( 2015). Stem Sap flow research: Progress and project. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 30(5), 98-105.
DOI URL |
[ 赵春彦, 司建华, 冯起, 鱼腾飞, 李炜 ( 2015). 树干液流研究进展与展望. 西北林学院学报, 30(5), 98-105.]
DOI URL |
|
[35] | Zhao YD, Gao C, Zhang X, Cai X ( 2016). Review of real-time detecting methods of water stress for plants. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 47, 290-300. |
[ 赵燕东, 高超, 张新, 蔡祥 ( 2016). 植物水分胁迫实时在线检测方法研究进展. 农业机械学报, 47, 290-300.] | |
[36] |
Zimmermann D, Reuss R, Westhoff M, Geßner P, Bauer W, Bamberg E, Bentrup FW, Zimmermann U ( 2008). A novel, non-invasive, online-monitoring, versatile and easy plant-based probe for measuring leaf water status. Journal of Experimental Botany, 59, 3157-3167.
DOI PMID |
[37] |
Zimmermann U, Bitter R, Marchiori PER, Ruüger S, Herenberger W, Sukhorukov VL, Schuüttler A, Ribeiro RV ( 2013). A non-invasive plant-based probe for continuous monitoring of water stress in real time: A new tool for irrigation scheduling and deeper insight into drought and salinity stress physiology. Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology, 25, 2-11.
DOI |
[1] | 祝维 周欧 孙一鸣 古丽米热·依力哈木 王亚飞 杨红青 贾黎明 席本野. 混交林内毛白杨和刺槐根系吸水的动态生态位划分[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(预发表): 0-0. |
[2] | 刘洋 马煦 邸楠 曾子航 付海曼 李新 席本野. 毛白杨根系液流与水力再分配特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(1): 0-0. |
[3] | 赵飞飞, 马煦, 邸楠, 王烨, 刘洋, 李广德, 贾黎明, 席本野. 毛白杨茎干不同方位夜间液流变化规律及其主要影响因子[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(8): 864-874. |
[4] | 张振振, 杨轲嘉, 顾宇璐, 赵平, 欧阳磊. 模拟降雨格局变化对亚热带地区两树种液流特征的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(11): 988-998. |
[5] | 刘畅, 孙鹏森, 刘世荣. 植物反射光谱对水分生理变化响应的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(1): 80-91. |
[6] | 邸楠,席本野,Jeremiah R.PINTO,王烨,李广德,贾黎明. 宽窄行栽植下三倍体毛白杨根系生物量分布及其对土壤养分因子的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(10): 961-971. |
[7] | 张智猛, 万书波, 戴良香, 宋文武, 陈静, 石运庆. 花生抗旱性鉴定指标的筛选与评价[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(1): 100-109. |
[8] | 何茜, 李吉跃, 沈应柏, 陈晓阳, 尚富华, 胡磊, 张志毅. 毛白杨杂种无性系叶片δ13C差异与气体交换参数[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(2): 144-150. |
[9] | 贺学礼, 张焕仕, 赵丽莉. 不同土壤中水分胁迫和AM真菌对油蒿抗旱性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(5): 994-1001. |
[10] | 蔡昆争, 吴学祝, 骆世明. 不同生育期水分胁迫对水稻根叶渗透调节物质变化的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(2): 491-500. |
[11] | 蔡一霞, 王维, 朱庆森. 水分胁迫对水稻籽粒蛋白质积累及营养品质的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2007, 31(3): 536-543. |
[12] | 韦莉莉, 张小全, 侯振宏, 徐德应, 余雪标. 杉木苗木光合作用及其产物分配对水分胁迫的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(3): 394-402. |
[13] | 郑青松, 刘兆普, 刘友良, 刘玲. 等渗的盐分和水分胁迫对芦荟幼苗生长和离子分布的效应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2004, 28(6): 823-827. |
[14] | 王云龙, 许振柱, 周广胜. 水分胁迫对羊草光合产物分配及其气体交换特征的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2004, 28(6): 803-809. |
[15] | 刘洪升, 李凤民, 徐昊. 不同水分条件下春小麦根系耗碳及其与产量形成的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2004, 28(2): 191-197. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19