植物生态学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 723-731.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0094
李振新1,2, 欧阳志云1,*(), 郑华1, 刘兴良3, 宿以明3
收稿日期:
2005-12-12
接受日期:
2006-03-28
出版日期:
2006-12-12
发布日期:
2006-09-30
通讯作者:
欧阳志云
作者简介:
E-mail: zyouyang@mail.rcees.ac.cn基金资助:
LI Zhen-Xin1,2, OUYANG Zhi-Yun1,*(), ZHENG Hua1, LIU Xing-Liang3, SU Yi-Ming3
Received:
2005-12-12
Accepted:
2006-03-28
Online:
2006-12-12
Published:
2006-09-30
Contact:
OUYANG Zhi-Yun
摘要:
植被的降雨分配作用对理解生态系统的水文功能具有重要的意义。该文对四川岷江上游岷江冷杉(Abies faxoniana)针叶林和川滇高山栎(Quercus aquifolioides)灌丛两种生态系统的降雨分配及降雨截留的影响因素进行了研究,探讨了植被分配降雨及截留降雨的影响机制和影响因素。文中采用定位观测的方法研究降雨分配。针叶林中冠层降雨截留占33.33%,树干茎流占0.07%,穿透雨占66.60%;而灌丛的冠层截留降雨为24.95%,穿透雨为75.05%;针叶林地被物的蓄留水能力(1.746 mm)要大于灌丛地被物的持水能力(0.941 mm);针叶林土壤的容积含水率(39.66%)也要高于灌丛土壤的容积含水率(38.19%);两种生态系统中的穿透雨率与降雨量的关系均可用逻辑斯谛方程较好地模拟。文中还选取了降雨量、降雨强度、降雨持续时间、两次降雨的间隔时间和次降雨期间的气温等5种因子分析影响两种生态系统降雨截留的主要因素。根据截留降雨与上述5种因子的偏相关分析结果:针叶林冠层的降雨截留主要受降雨量、降雨持续时间和间隔时间的影响;灌丛的降雨截留主要受降雨量、气温与降雨持续时间的影响。文中从当地的降雨特征与两种生态系统微气候差异的角度分析了两种生态系统降雨分配及降雨截留影响因素差异的原因。
李振新, 欧阳志云, 郑华, 刘兴良, 宿以明. 岷江上游两种生态系统降雨分配的比较. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(5): 723-731. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0094
LI Zhen-Xin, OUYANG Zhi-Yun, ZHENG Hua, LIU Xing-Liang, SU Yi-Ming. COMPARISON OF RAINFALL REDISTRIBUTION IN TWO ECOSYSTEMS IN MINJIANG UPPER CATCHMENTS, CHINA. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2006, 30(5): 723-731. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0094
雨强分级Classification of rainfall intensity (mm·h-1) | 0~0.2 | 0.2~0.5 | 0.5~1.0 | 1.0~2.0 | 2.0~5.0 | >5.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
次数Frequency | 10 | 18 | 12 | 10 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
降雨量范围Rrainfall range (mm) | 0.30~3.60 | 0.70~9.00 | 1.90~17.40 | 0.60~25.50 | 3.50~30.60 | 6.10 | |||||||||||||||||||
平均降雨量 Average rainfall (mm) | 1.20 | 3.99 | 8.57 | 10.84 | 13.32 | 6.10 |
表1 2001年7~9月及2002年6~8月邓生降雨特征
Table 1 The rainfall characteristics in Dengsheng from July to Sep., 2001 and June to Aug., 2002
雨强分级Classification of rainfall intensity (mm·h-1) | 0~0.2 | 0.2~0.5 | 0.5~1.0 | 1.0~2.0 | 2.0~5.0 | >5.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
次数Frequency | 10 | 18 | 12 | 10 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
降雨量范围Rrainfall range (mm) | 0.30~3.60 | 0.70~9.00 | 1.90~17.40 | 0.60~25.50 | 3.50~30.60 | 6.10 | |||||||||||||||||||
平均降雨量 Average rainfall (mm) | 1.20 | 3.99 | 8.57 | 10.84 | 13.32 | 6.10 |
气温(℃) Temperature | 最低气温 (℃) Minimum temperature | 最高气温 (℃) Maximum temperature | 相对湿度 (%) Relative humidity | 0 cm地温 (℃) 0 cm Soil temperature | 5 cm地温 (℃) 5 cm Soil temperature | 10 cm地温 (℃) 10 cm Soil temperature | 15 cm地温 (℃) 15 cm Soil temperature | 20 cm地温 (℃) 20 cm Soil temperature | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
林外 Open ground | 12.9 | 6.0 | 25.5 | 77.9 | 16.5 | 15.4 | 15.2 | 14.8 | 14.7 |
针叶林 Conifer forest | 12.4 | 6.0 | 22.0 | 83.8 | 12.4 | 11.4 | 11.0 | 10.8 | 10.7 |
灌丛 Shrub | 12.8 | 6.0 | 28.0 | 79.7 | 13.3 | 12.0 | 11.7 | 11.8 | 11.8 |
表2 林外、针叶林及灌丛的小气候比较
Table 2 Comparison of microclimate of conifer forest, shrub and open ground
气温(℃) Temperature | 最低气温 (℃) Minimum temperature | 最高气温 (℃) Maximum temperature | 相对湿度 (%) Relative humidity | 0 cm地温 (℃) 0 cm Soil temperature | 5 cm地温 (℃) 5 cm Soil temperature | 10 cm地温 (℃) 10 cm Soil temperature | 15 cm地温 (℃) 15 cm Soil temperature | 20 cm地温 (℃) 20 cm Soil temperature | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
林外 Open ground | 12.9 | 6.0 | 25.5 | 77.9 | 16.5 | 15.4 | 15.2 | 14.8 | 14.7 |
针叶林 Conifer forest | 12.4 | 6.0 | 22.0 | 83.8 | 12.4 | 11.4 | 11.0 | 10.8 | 10.7 |
灌丛 Shrub | 12.8 | 6.0 | 28.0 | 79.7 | 13.3 | 12.0 | 11.7 | 11.8 | 11.8 |
Pearson相关分析 Pearson correlation | 冠层截留 Interception of rainfall by canopy (I) | 降雨量 Rainfall (R) | 雨强 Rainfall intensity (RI) | 持续时间 Duration of the rainfall (DA) | 间隔时间 Interval time of two rainfall (INT) | 温度 Temperature (T) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.794 p<0.001 | 0.249 p=0.150 | 0.558 p<0.001 | 0.133 p=0.445 | -0.035 p=0.840 | ||
偏相关分析 Partial correlation | I | R | RI | DA | INT | T |
0.591 p<0.001 | 0.202 p=0.277 | 0.392 p=0.029 | 0.383 p=0.033 | -0.063 p=0.736 |
表3 针叶林树冠截留与其它因素的Pearson相关及偏相关系数
Table 3 The Pearson correlation and the partial correlation coefficients of rainfall intercepion and other influencing factors of conifer forest
Pearson相关分析 Pearson correlation | 冠层截留 Interception of rainfall by canopy (I) | 降雨量 Rainfall (R) | 雨强 Rainfall intensity (RI) | 持续时间 Duration of the rainfall (DA) | 间隔时间 Interval time of two rainfall (INT) | 温度 Temperature (T) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.794 p<0.001 | 0.249 p=0.150 | 0.558 p<0.001 | 0.133 p=0.445 | -0.035 p=0.840 | ||
偏相关分析 Partial correlation | I | R | RI | DA | INT | T |
0.591 p<0.001 | 0.202 p=0.277 | 0.392 p=0.029 | 0.383 p=0.033 | -0.063 p=0.736 |
Pearson相关分析 Pearson correlation | 冠层截留 Interception of rainfall by canopy (I) | 降雨量 Rainfall (R) | 雨强 Rainfall intensity (RI) | 持续时间 Duration of the rainfall (DA) | 间隔时间 Interval time of two rainfall (INT) | 温度 Temperature (T) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.818 p<0.001 | -0.014 p=0.947 | 0.690 p<0.001 | 0.076 p=0.712 | -0.468 p=0.016 | ||
偏相关分析 Partial correlation | I | R | RI | DA | INT | T |
0.684 p<0.001 | 0.091 p=0.688 | 0.445 p=0.038 | 0.177 p=0.432 | -0.520 p=0.013 |
表4 亚高山灌丛树冠截留与其它因素的Pearson相关及偏相关系数
Table 4 The Pearson correlation and the partial correlation coefficients of rainfall intercepion and other influencing factors of subalpine shrub
Pearson相关分析 Pearson correlation | 冠层截留 Interception of rainfall by canopy (I) | 降雨量 Rainfall (R) | 雨强 Rainfall intensity (RI) | 持续时间 Duration of the rainfall (DA) | 间隔时间 Interval time of two rainfall (INT) | 温度 Temperature (T) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.818 p<0.001 | -0.014 p=0.947 | 0.690 p<0.001 | 0.076 p=0.712 | -0.468 p=0.016 | ||
偏相关分析 Partial correlation | I | R | RI | DA | INT | T |
0.684 p<0.001 | 0.091 p=0.688 | 0.445 p=0.038 | 0.177 p=0.432 | -0.520 p=0.013 |
类型 Type | 厚度 Thick (cm) | 地表盖度 Coverage | 干重 Dry weight (g·m-2) (平均值±标准差) (Mean±SD) | 原重 Natural weight (g·m-2) (平均值±标准差) Mean±SD) | 最大吸水重 Weight with maximum water storage (g·m-2) (平均值±标准差) Mean±SD) | 自然吸水率 Natural water storage capacity (%) | 最大吸水率 Maximum water storage capacity (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
苔藓 Lichen (3) | 4 | 60% | 175.3±65.6 | 660.7±322.3 | 1 110.1±528.7 | 368.3% | 620.4% |
针叶林枯落物 Ground litter in conifer forest (3) | 3 | 90% | 2 199.8±459.4 | 6 760.0±1951.6 | 8 065.5±2 199.6 | 307.3% | 366.6% |
灌丛枯落物 Ground litter in shrub (3) | 3 | 95% | 895.8±125.5 | 2 533.3±334.9 | 3 468.1±433.8 | 283.0% | 388.0% |
表5 苔藓及枯落物的贮量及吸持水状况
Table 5 The stocking weight of lichen and ground litter, and theirs water storage capacity
类型 Type | 厚度 Thick (cm) | 地表盖度 Coverage | 干重 Dry weight (g·m-2) (平均值±标准差) (Mean±SD) | 原重 Natural weight (g·m-2) (平均值±标准差) Mean±SD) | 最大吸水重 Weight with maximum water storage (g·m-2) (平均值±标准差) Mean±SD) | 自然吸水率 Natural water storage capacity (%) | 最大吸水率 Maximum water storage capacity (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
苔藓 Lichen (3) | 4 | 60% | 175.3±65.6 | 660.7±322.3 | 1 110.1±528.7 | 368.3% | 620.4% |
针叶林枯落物 Ground litter in conifer forest (3) | 3 | 90% | 2 199.8±459.4 | 6 760.0±1951.6 | 8 065.5±2 199.6 | 307.3% | 366.6% |
灌丛枯落物 Ground litter in shrub (3) | 3 | 95% | 895.8±125.5 | 2 533.3±334.9 | 3 468.1±433.8 | 283.0% | 388.0% |
层次 Soil layer (cm) | 土壤容重 Bulk density of soil (g·cm-3) | 土壤孔隙度 Soil porosity (%) | 土壤容积含水量 Bulk moisture content of soil (%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
针叶林 Conifer forest | 灌丛 Shrub | 针叶林 Conifer forest | 灌丛 Shrub | 针叶林 Conifer forest | 灌丛 Shrub | ||
0~20 | 0.652 | 0.731 | 75.40 | 72.42 | 41.00 | 34.55 | |
20~40 | 0.792 | 0.894 | 70.11 | 66.26 | 43.54 | 37.63 | |
40~60 | 0.779 | 0.993 | 70.60 | 62.53 | 34.45 | 42.40 | |
平均 Average | 0.741 | 0.873 | 72.04 | 67.06 | 39.66 | 38.19 |
表6 两种生态系统的土壤容重及土壤含水量
Table 6 The bulk density of soil and soil moisture content of the two ecosystems
层次 Soil layer (cm) | 土壤容重 Bulk density of soil (g·cm-3) | 土壤孔隙度 Soil porosity (%) | 土壤容积含水量 Bulk moisture content of soil (%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
针叶林 Conifer forest | 灌丛 Shrub | 针叶林 Conifer forest | 灌丛 Shrub | 针叶林 Conifer forest | 灌丛 Shrub | ||
0~20 | 0.652 | 0.731 | 75.40 | 72.42 | 41.00 | 34.55 | |
20~40 | 0.792 | 0.894 | 70.11 | 66.26 | 43.54 | 37.63 | |
40~60 | 0.779 | 0.993 | 70.60 | 62.53 | 34.45 | 42.40 | |
平均 Average | 0.741 | 0.873 | 72.04 | 67.06 | 39.66 | 38.19 |
[1] | Asdak C, Jarvis PG, van Gardingen P, Fraser A (1998). Rainfall interception loss in unlogged and logged forest areas of central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Journal of Hydrology, 206,237-244. |
[2] | Bao W (鲍文), Bao WK (包维楷), He BH (何柄辉), Ding DR (丁德蓉) (2004). Redistribution effects of tree canopy of the artificial Pinus tabulaeformis forest on precipitation in the upperstream of Minjiang River . Journal of Beijing Forestry University (北京林业大学学报), 26(5),10-16. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[3] | Chen YZ (陈引珍), He F (何凡), Zhang HJ (张洪江), Wen XS (温熙胜) (2005). Preliminary analysis on factors influencing canopy interception in Jinyun Mountain. Science of Soil and Water Conservation (中国水土保持科学), 3(3),69-72. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[4] | Gómez JA, Giráldez JV, Fereres E (2001). Rainfall interception by olive trees in relation to leaf area. Agricultural Water Management, 49,65-76. |
[5] | Gómez JA, Vanderlinden K, Giráldez JV, Fereres E (2002). Rainfall concentration under olive trees. Agricultural Water Management, 55,53-70. |
[6] | Gong HD (巩合德), Wang KY (王开运), Yang WQ (杨万勤), Wang Q (王乾), Zhang YB (张远彬) (2004). Throughfall and stemflow in a Betula platyphylla forest at the subalpine of western Sichuan . Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 23(4),17-20. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[7] | Gong HD (巩合德), Wang KY (王开运), Yang WQ (杨万勤), Wang Q (王乾), Zhang YB (张远彬) (2005). Throughfall and stemflow in a primary spruce forest in the subalpine of western Sichuan. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 41,198-201. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[8] | Huang LL (黄礼隆) (1994). Pimary study on water conservation function of subalpine forest in western Sichuan. In: Zhou XF 周晓峰 ed. Long-Term Studies of Forest Ecosystems in China(中国森林生态系统定位研究). Northeast Forestry University Press, Harbin, 400-412. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[9] | Klaassen WH, Landreijer JM, Veen AWL (1996). Rainfall interception near a forest edge. Journal of Hydrology, 185,349-361. |
[10] | Li ZX (李振新), Zheng H (郑华), Ouyang ZY (欧阳志云), Wang XK (王效科), Liu XL (刘兴良), Su YM (宿以明) (2004). The spatial distribution characteristics of throughfall under Abies faxoniana forest in the Wolong Nature Reserve . Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 25,1015-1021. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[11] | Liu SR (刘世荣), Sun PS (孙鹏森), Wen YG (温远光) (2003). Comparative analysis of hydrological functions of major forest ecosystems in China. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 27,16-22. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[12] | Llorens PR, Poch J, Latron J, Gallart F (1997). Rainfall interception by a Pinus sylvestris forest patch overgrown in a Mediterranean mountainous abandoned area. I. Monitoring design and results down to the event scale . Journal of Hydrology, 199,331-345. |
[13] | Ma XH (马雪华) (1987). Studies on hydrological function of alpine fir in Miyaluo, Sichuan Province. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 23,253-265. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[14] | Wang JS (王景升), Ren QS (任青山), Lan XZ (兰小中) (2002). Study on the distribution pattern of precipitation in Abies georgei var. smithii virgin forest . Forestry Science & Technology (林业科技), 27(6),7-10. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[15] | Wang MY (王鸣远), Wang LX (王礼先) (1995). Effect of masson pine forests on rainfall interception in the reservoir area of the Three Gorges of Yangtze River. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (北京林业大学学报), 17(4),74-81. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[16] | Xie CH (谢春华), Guan WB (关文彬), Wu JA (吴建安), Cheng GW (程根伟), Luo J (罗辑) (2002). Interception capability of dark coniferous forest ecosystem in Gongga Mountain. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (北京林业大学学报), 24(4),68-71. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 吴瀚, 白洁, 李均力, 古丽•加帕尔, 包安明. 新疆地区植被覆盖度时空变化及其影响因素分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(1): 41-55. |
[2] | 徐光来, 李爱娟, 徐晓华, 杨先成, 杨强强. 中国生态功能保护区归一化植被指数动态及气候因子驱动[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(3): 213-223. |
[3] | 罗林, 黄艳, 梁进, 汪恩涛, 胡君, 贺合亮, 赵春章. 西南亚高山针叶林主要树种互作及增温对根区土壤微生物群落的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(8): 875-884. |
[4] | 闫敏, 李增元, 田昕, 陈尔学, 谷成燕. 黑河上游植被总初级生产力遥感估算及其对气候变化的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(1): 1-12. |
[5] | 李茂萍, 缪宁, 喻泓, 马姜明. 青藏高原东缘红桦-岷江冷杉次生林中大径级保留木对其他林木的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(12): 1263-1272. |
[6] | 夏磊, 吴福忠, 杨万勤. 季节性冻融期间土壤动物对岷江冷杉凋落叶质量损失的贡献[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(11): 1127-1135. |
[7] | 马姜明, 刘世荣, 史作民, 张远东, 缪宁. 川西亚高山暗针叶林恢复过程中岷江冷杉天然更新状况及其影响因子[J]. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(4): 646-657. |
[8] | 尹华军, 赖挺, 程新颖, 蒋先敏, 刘庆. 增温对川西亚高山针叶林内不同光环境下红桦和岷江冷杉幼苗生长和生理的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(5): 1072-1083. |
[9] | 徐振锋, 胡庭兴, 张远彬, 鲜骏仁, 王开运. 川西亚高山林线交错带糙皮桦和岷江冷杉幼苗物候与生长对模拟增温的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(5): 1061-1071. |
[10] | 李媛, 陶建平, 王永健, 余小红, 席一. 亚高山暗针叶林林缘华西箭竹对岷江冷杉幼苗更新的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2007, 31(2): 283-290. |
[11] | 张远彬, 王开运, 鲜骏仁. 岷江冷杉林林窗小气候及其对不同龄级岷江冷杉幼苗生长的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(6): 941-946. |
[12] | 程伟, 吴宁, 罗鹏. 岷江上游林线附近岷江冷杉种群的生存分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(3): 349-353. |
[13] | 赵常明, 陈庆恒, 乔永康, 潘开文. 青藏高原东缘岷江冷杉天然群落的种群结构和空间分布格局[J]. 植物生态学报, 2004, 28(3): 341-350. |
[14] | 樊后保. 森林降水酸度及电导率的时空变化[J]. 植物生态学报, 2000, 24(4): 463-467. |
[15] | 黄建辉, 李海涛, 韩兴国, 陈灵芝. 暖温带两种针叶林生态系统中茎流和穿透雨的养分特征研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2000, 24(2): 248-251. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19