贵州普定喀斯特次生林乔灌层地上生物量

doi:10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2009.04.008

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

生物量是植物群落最重要的特征之一, 也是研究生态系统基本过程和功能的重要参数。我国西南喀斯特山地次生林是退化生态系统恢复过程中的重要阶段, 其生境特殊, 乔灌层种类繁杂且生长形态多样, 物种间体积质量密度差异悬殊, 生物量测定极为困难。所以, 有关其生物量的基础资料极为缺乏。该文根据对普定喀斯特生态站的窄叶石栎(Lithocarpus confinis)+云南鼠刺(Itea yunnanensis)林、圆果化香(Platycarya longipes)+云南鼠刺林、圆果化香+槲栎(Quercus aliena)林3个主要次生森林类型的样地调查资料, 采用样木回归模型法和收获法, 研究了群落乔灌层地上生物量及其分配格局。利用172株样木数据建立了圆果化香、窄叶石栎、云南鼠刺、刺楸(Kalopanax septemlobus)、安顺润楠(Machilus cavaleriei)、槲栎、香叶树(Lindera communis)、川钓樟(Lindera pulcherrima var. hemsleyana)、异叶鼠李(Rhamnus heterophylla)、倒卵叶旌节花(Stachyurus obovatus)、薄叶鼠李(Rhamnus leptophylla)、贵州花椒(Zanthoxylum esquirolii)、竹叶椒(Zanthoxylum planispinum)、铁仔(Myrsine africana)和刺异叶花椒(Zanthoxylum dimorphophyllum var. spinifolium)15个主要树种的分种生物量回归模型。同时, 利用这些样木建立了3个不同胸径(D)组(D＜1 cm、1 cm≤D≤5 cm和D>5 cm)的生物量回归模型。通过进一步分种和分组的计算得出: 这3个次生乔木林的乔灌层地上生物量分别为85.6×10³、65.3×10³和115.2×10³ kg·hm^-2; 层次分配上, 3个样地的乔木层地上生物量占绝对优势, 分别约占乔灌层地上生物量的98.5%、96.6%和99.0%; 径级分配上, 3个样地的生物量主要集中在大径级(D≥10 cm)的个体上; 物种分配上, 3个样地的生物量排序前10位的物种分别约占乔灌层地上生物量的99.3%、97.3%和99.0%, 并集中分配在少量优势树种中。

关键词: 生物量, 回归模型, 生物量分配, 喀斯特森林

Abstract:

Aims Information on community biomass is very important for understanding the structure, function and productivity of ecosystems; however, the biomass of karst forests is difficult to measure because of high habitat heterogeneity, complex and irregular growth forms, etc., and it seldom has been studied. Our objective was to study the biomass of karst forests to learn the structure and function of the ecosystems.
Methods We estimated biomass and allocation of tree and shrub layers in three karst forest communities at an ecological research station in Puding, Guizhou, using allometric analysis and sampling harvest methods.
Important findings Biomass regression models were established for three diameter classes (＜1 cm, 1-5 cm and >5 cm) and 15 abundant species: Platycarya longipes, Lithocarpus confinis, Itea yunnanesis, Kalopanax septemlobus, Machilus cavaleriei, Quercus aliena, Lindera communis, Lindera pulcherrima var. hemsleyana, Rhamnus hetrophylla, Stachyurus obovatus, Rhamnus leptophylla, Zanthoxylum esquirolii, Zanthoxylum planispinum, Myrsine africana and Zanthoxylum dimorphophyllum var. spinifolium. Average biomass of canopy and shrub layers was 88.7×10³ kg·hm^-2, with the tree layer accounting for about 98% of the total. Biomass allocation among different diameter classes was concentrated in the individuals >10 cm diameter at breast height. Ten species made up about 98% of the total biomass of canopy and shrub layers, and the total biomass was concentrated in the dominant trees.

Key words: biomass, regression models, biomass allocation, karst forest

刘长成, 魏雅芬, 刘玉国, 郭柯. 贵州普定喀斯特次生林乔灌层地上生物量. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(4): 698-705. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2009.04.008

LIU Chang-Cheng, WEI Ya-Fen, LIU Yu-Guo, GUO Ke. BIOMASS OF CANOPY AND SHRUB LAYERS OF KARST FORESTS IN PUDING, GUIZHOU, CHINA. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2009, 33(4): 698-705. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2009.04.008

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2009.04.008

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2009/V33/I4/698

图/表 5

参考文献 17

[1]	Chave J, Riera B, Dubois MA (2001). Estimation of biomass in a neotropical forest of French Guiana: spatial and temporal variability. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 17, 79-96. DOI URL
[2]	Huang DZ (黄典忠) (2006). Biomass characteristics of secondary forest community of Cyclobalanopsis chungii in the lower Minjiang river. Protection Forest Science and Technology (防护林科技), 1, 16-18. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	Jiang YL (姜运力), Wang J (王进), Ding FJ (丁访军), Yao XH (姚小华), Zhang XS (张显松), Zhu YW (褚永维) (2006). Study on the plant community in the karst rocky desertification areas in Puding County of Guizhou Province. Guizhou Forestry Science and Technology (贵州林业科技), 34(1), 55-59. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	Lin F (林芳) (2006). Biomass characteristics and allocation of Castanopsis fargesii natural stand in Wuyishan mountains. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis (江西农业大学学报), 28, 74-77. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	Lü XT (吕晓涛), Tang JW (唐建维), He YC (何有才), Duan WG (段文贵), Song JP (宋军平), XU HL (许海龙), Zhu SZ (朱胜忠) (2007). Biomass and its allocation in tropical seasonal rain forest in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version)(植物生态学报), 31, 11-22. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	Overman JPM, Witte HJL, Saldarriaga JG (1994). Evaluation of regression models for above-ground biomass determination in Amazon rainforest. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 10, 207-218. DOI URL
[7]	Qi JF (戚剑飞), Tang JW (唐建维) (2008). Biomass and its allocation pattern of monsoon rain forest over limestone in Xishuangbanna of Southwest China. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 27, 167-177. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	Qiu XZ (邱学忠), Xie SC (谢寿昌), Jing GF (荆桂芬) (1984). A prelimiary study on biomass of Lithocarpus xylocarpus forest in Xujiaba Region, Ailao Mts., Yunnan. Acta Botanica Yunnanica (云南植物研究), 6, 85-92. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	Tu YL (屠玉麟), Yang J (杨军) (1995). Study on biomass of the karst scrub community in central region of Guizhou Provice. Carsologica Sinica (中国岩溶), 14, 119-208. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	Yang HK (杨汉奎), Cheng SZ (程仕泽 ) (1991). Study on biomass of the karst forest community in Maolan, Guizhou Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 11, 307-313. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	Yang TH (杨同辉), Da LJ (达良俊), Li XP (李修鹏) (2007). Biomass of evergreen broad-leaved forest in Tiantong National forest Park, Zhejiang Provice. (II). Aboveground biomass and its allocation pattern. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College (浙江林学院学报), 24, 389-395. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	Yao FP (姚丰平), Wu JS (吴军寿), Yao LW (姚理武), Fan LM (范良敏), Cheng YP (程亚平), Mei JW (梅建伟) (2003). Determination and evaluation of biomass of different broad-leaf stand types in Qingyuan forest center. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology (浙江林业科技), 23, 74-78. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	Zhao ZY (赵振勇), Wang RH (王让会), Zhang HZ (张慧芝), Wang L (王雷) (2006). Aboveground biomass of Tamarix on piedmont plain of Tianshan Mountains south slope. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 17, 1557-1562. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	Zhu SQ (朱守谦) (1993). Ecoloigcal Research on Karst Forest (I)(喀斯特森林生态研究I). Guizhou Science and Technology Press,Guiyang, China. (in Chinese)
[15]	Zhu SQ (朱守谦) (1997). Ecoloigcal Research on Karst Forest (II) (喀斯特森林生态研究II). Guizhou Science and Technology Press,Guiyang, China. (in Chinese)
[16]	Zhu SQ (朱守谦) (2003). Ecoloigcal Research on Karst Forest (III) (喀斯特森林生态研究 III). Guizhou Science and Technology Press,Guiyang, China. (in Chinese)
[17]	Zhu SQ (朱守谦), Wei LM (魏鲁明), Chen ZR (陈正仁), Zhang CG (张从贵) (1995). A preliminary study on biomass components of karst forest in Maolan of Guizhou Province, China. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 19, 358-367. (in Chinese with English abstract)

样地号 Plot No.	I	II	III
地点 Study site	天龙山 Tianlongshan	天龙山 Tianlongshan	赵家田 Zhaojiatian
优势种 Dominant species	窄叶石栎(Lithocarpus confinis)、云南鼠刺(Itea yunnanensis)	圆果化香(Platycarya longipes)、云南鼠刺(Itea yunnanensis)	圆果化香(Platycarya longipes)、槲栎(Quercus aliena)
纬度 Latitude	26°14′43″ N	26°14′43″ N	26°16′1″ N
经度 Longitude	105°45′51″ E	105°45′37″ E	105°46′39″ E
海拔 Altitude (m)	1 506	1 415	1 431
坡向 Aspect	S	SW	N
坡度 Slope (°)	41	30	40
坡位 Position	上 Upper	中 Middle	中 Middle
土壤覆盖率 Soil coverage (%)	80	25	70

样地号 Plot No.	I	II	III
地点 Study site	天龙山 Tianlongshan	天龙山 Tianlongshan	赵家田 Zhaojiatian
优势种 Dominant species	窄叶石栎(Lithocarpus confinis)、云南鼠刺(Itea yunnanensis)	圆果化香(Platycarya longipes)、云南鼠刺(Itea yunnanensis)	圆果化香(Platycarya longipes)、槲栎(Quercus aliena)
纬度 Latitude	26°14′43″ N	26°14′43″ N	26°16′1″ N
经度 Longitude	105°45′51″ E	105°45′37″ E	105°46′39″ E
海拔 Altitude (m)	1 506	1 415	1 431
坡向 Aspect	S	SW	N
坡度 Slope (°)	41	30	40
坡位 Position	上 Upper	中 Middle	中 Middle
土壤覆盖率 Soil coverage (%)	80	25	70

物种 Species	径级(cm)及样本数 DBH classes (cm) and sample No.	回归模型 Regression models	R²
圆果化香 Platycarya longipes	1.0≤D≤22.6 (n=14)	y=1.961 1(D²H)^{0.892 1}	0.988 6**
窄叶石栎 Lithocarpus confinis	1.5≤D≤12.5 (n=12)	y=0.896 7(D²H)^{0.963 6}	0.981 7**
云南鼠刺 Itea yunnanensis	1.0≤D≤12.4 (n=10)	y=1.954 5(D²H)^{0.899 6}	0.956 8**
刺楸 Kalopanax septemlobus	1.0≤D≤22.6 (n=14)	y=1.141 6(D²H)^{0.882 8}	0.996 7**
安顺润楠 Machilus cavaleriei	1.0≤D≤19.9 (n=13)	y=2.621 1(D²H)^{0.856 5}	0.973 3**
槲栎 Quercus aliena	1.5≤D≤22.9 (n=10)	y=0.786 5(D²H)^{0.963 2}	0.994 2**
香叶树 Lindera communis	0.6≤d≤1.4 (n=13)	y=2.279 5(d²H)^{0.763 6}	0.961 9**
川钓樟 Lindera pulcherrima var. hemsleyana	0.6≤d≤2.5 (n=13)	y=1.329 5(d²H)^0.835	0.938 8**
异叶鼠李 Rhamnus hetrophylla	0.5≤d≤1.3 (n=10)	y=0.492 4(d²H)+21.122	0.900 5**
倒卵叶旌节花 Stachyurus obovatus	0.9≤d≤2.2 (n=10)	y=0.186 7(d²H)^{1.200 3}	0.940 6**
薄叶鼠李 Rhamnus leptophylla	0.7≤d≤3.1 (n=10)	y=0.959 8(d²H)^{0.884 9}	0.956 9**
贵州花椒 Zanthoxylum esquirolii	0.3≤d≤0.9 (n=11)	y=1.180 7(d²H)+1.175 4	0.984 9**
竹叶椒 Zanthoxylum planispinum	0.6≤d≤1.4 (n=12)	y=0.287 6(d²H)+22.075	0.900 6**
铁仔 Myrsine africana	0.2≤d≤0.8 (n=10)	y=0.575 7(d²H)+18.309	0.814 4**
刺异叶花椒 Zanthoxylum dimorphophyllum var. spinifolium	0.3≤d≤1.3 (n=10)	y=0.537 9(d²H)+29.405	0.935 9**
各径级 DBH classes	D＜1.0 (n=55)	y=0.541 8(d²H)+17.287	0.781 7**
	1.0＜D≤5.0 (n=66)	y=0.583 4(D²H)-8.151	0.958 4**
	D>5.0 (n=26)	y=2.014 1(D²H)^0.889	0.922 8**

物种 Species	径级(cm)及样本数 DBH classes (cm) and sample No.	回归模型 Regression models	R²
圆果化香 Platycarya longipes	1.0≤D≤22.6 (n=14)	y=1.961 1(D²H)^{0.892 1}	0.988 6**
窄叶石栎 Lithocarpus confinis	1.5≤D≤12.5 (n=12)	y=0.896 7(D²H)^{0.963 6}	0.981 7**
云南鼠刺 Itea yunnanensis	1.0≤D≤12.4 (n=10)	y=1.954 5(D²H)^{0.899 6}	0.956 8**
刺楸 Kalopanax septemlobus	1.0≤D≤22.6 (n=14)	y=1.141 6(D²H)^{0.882 8}	0.996 7**
安顺润楠 Machilus cavaleriei	1.0≤D≤19.9 (n=13)	y=2.621 1(D²H)^{0.856 5}	0.973 3**
槲栎 Quercus aliena	1.5≤D≤22.9 (n=10)	y=0.786 5(D²H)^{0.963 2}	0.994 2**
香叶树 Lindera communis	0.6≤d≤1.4 (n=13)	y=2.279 5(d²H)^{0.763 6}	0.961 9**
川钓樟 Lindera pulcherrima var. hemsleyana	0.6≤d≤2.5 (n=13)	y=1.329 5(d²H)^0.835	0.938 8**
异叶鼠李 Rhamnus hetrophylla	0.5≤d≤1.3 (n=10)	y=0.492 4(d²H)+21.122	0.900 5**
倒卵叶旌节花 Stachyurus obovatus	0.9≤d≤2.2 (n=10)	y=0.186 7(d²H)^{1.200 3}	0.940 6**
薄叶鼠李 Rhamnus leptophylla	0.7≤d≤3.1 (n=10)	y=0.959 8(d²H)^{0.884 9}	0.956 9**
贵州花椒 Zanthoxylum esquirolii	0.3≤d≤0.9 (n=11)	y=1.180 7(d²H)+1.175 4	0.984 9**
竹叶椒 Zanthoxylum planispinum	0.6≤d≤1.4 (n=12)	y=0.287 6(d²H)+22.075	0.900 6**
铁仔 Myrsine africana	0.2≤d≤0.8 (n=10)	y=0.575 7(d²H)+18.309	0.814 4**
刺异叶花椒 Zanthoxylum dimorphophyllum var. spinifolium	0.3≤d≤1.3 (n=10)	y=0.537 9(d²H)+29.405	0.935 9**
各径级 DBH classes	D＜1.0 (n=55)	y=0.541 8(d²H)+17.287	0.781 7**
	1.0＜D≤5.0 (n=66)	y=0.583 4(D²H)-8.151	0.958 4**
	D>5.0 (n=26)	y=2.014 1(D²H)^0.889	0.922 8**

层次 Layer	样地I Plot I		样地II Plot II				平均 Average
层次 Layer	个体数 No. of individual	生物量 Biomass	个体数 No. of individual	生物量 Biomass	个体数 No. of individual	生物量 Biomass	个体数 No. of individual	生物量 Biomass
乔木层 Tree layer	8 400	84.3	7 583	63.1	6 450	114.0	7 478	87.1
乔木层 Tree layer	(40.4)	(98.5)	(65.58)	(96.6)	(55.8)	(99.0)	(53.9)	(98.0)
灌木层 Shrub layer	12400	1.3	4 000	2.2	5 100	1.2	7167	1.6
灌木层 Shrub layer	(59.6)	(1.5)	(34.5)	(3.4)	(44.2)	(1.0)	(46.1)	(2.0)
总计 Total	20 800	85.6	11 583	65.3	11 550	115. 2	14 644	88.7