植物生态学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9): 1016-1024.DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.09.002
刘珏宏, 高慧, 张丽红, 陈丽萍, 赵念席, 高玉葆*()
收稿日期:
2010-03-29
接受日期:
2010-06-18
出版日期:
2010-03-29
发布日期:
2010-10-08
通讯作者:
高玉葆
作者简介:
* E-mail: ybgao@mail.nankai.edu.cn
LIU Jue-Hong, GAO Hui, ZHANG Li-Hong, CHEN Li-Ping, ZHAO Nian-Xi, GAO Yu-Bao*()
Received:
2010-03-29
Accepted:
2010-06-18
Online:
2010-03-29
Published:
2010-10-08
Contact:
GAO Yu-Bao
摘要:
内蒙古锡林郭勒草原处于我国典型草原分布区, 但部分地区有戈壁针茅(Stipa gobica)等荒漠成分侵入, 并与大针茅(S. grandis)和克氏针茅(S. krylovii)共同形成斑块状格局分布, 目前尚不清楚群落中优势种之间的相互作用关系。采用2 × 2列联表, 通过方差分析、Pearson相关分析和Spearman秩相关分析等研究方法, 对大针茅+克氏针茅群落的大针茅斑块、克氏针茅斑块和戈壁针茅斑块中的24种主要植物的种间联结动态进行了定量分析。结果表明: 1)群落主要成分总体上种间联结呈无关联, 种间关联松散; 2) 3种针茅斑块的种间关联分析, 验证了由于干扰、竞争、土壤环境与植物相互作用形成的斑块分布格局, 此结果为种对正、负关联理论提供了有力证据; 3) 同一种对的联结性质(正关联或负关联)或关联程度因斑块不同而发生改变, 根据24个优势种群对环境的适应方式和主导生态因素, 可将它们划分为3大生态种组。
刘珏宏, 高慧, 张丽红, 陈丽萍, 赵念席, 高玉葆. 内蒙古锡林郭勒草原大针茅-克氏针茅群落的种间关联特征分析. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(9): 1016-1024. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.09.002
LIU Jue-Hong, GAO Hui, ZHANG Li-Hong, CHEN Li-Ping, ZHAO Nian-Xi, GAO Yu-Bao. Comparative analysis of inter-specific association within the Stipa grandis-S. krylovii community in typical steppe of Inner Mongolia, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(9): 1016-1024. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.09.002
编号 Code | 物种 Species | 平均重要值 Mean importance value (%) |
---|---|---|
1 | 银灰旋花 Convolvulus ammannii | 16.89 |
2 | 猪毛菜 Salsola collina | 15.48 |
3 | 大针茅 Stipa grandis | 10.59 |
4 | 克氏针茅 Stipa krylovii | 10.40 |
5 | 野韭 Allium ramosum | 8.84 |
6 | 羊草 Leymus chinensis | 6.86 |
7 | 戈壁针茅 Stipa gobica | 5.53 |
8 | 双齿葱 Allium bidentatum | 5.23 |
9 | 木地肤 Kochia prostrata | 4.65 |
10 | 并头黄芩 Scutellaria scordlifloia | 3.98 |
11 | 刺穗藜 Chenopodium aristatum | 3.09 |
12 | 知母 Anemarrhena asphodeloides | 2.60 |
13 | 糙隐子草 Cleistogenes squarros | 1.91 |
14 | 冰草 Agropyron cristatum | 0.89 |
15 | 黄囊薹草 Carex korshinskyi | 0.68 |
16 | 天门冬 Asparagus cochinchinensis | 0.62 |
17 | 狭叶锦鸡儿 Caragana stenophyll | 0.56 |
18 | 无芒隐子草 Cleistogenes songorica | 0.44 |
19 | 细叶葱 Allium tenuissimum | 0.29 |
20 | 乳白花黄芪 Astragalus galactites | 0.12 |
21 | 细叶鸢尾 Iris tenuifolia | 0.11 |
22 | 达乌里胡枝子 Lespedeza davurica | 0.10 |
23 | 灰绿藜 Chenopodium glaucum | 0.09 |
24 | 狗尾草 Setaria viridi | 0.07 |
表1 斑块样地24种植物的编号和重要值
Table 1 Name, code and importance value of 24 species in the patch plots
编号 Code | 物种 Species | 平均重要值 Mean importance value (%) |
---|---|---|
1 | 银灰旋花 Convolvulus ammannii | 16.89 |
2 | 猪毛菜 Salsola collina | 15.48 |
3 | 大针茅 Stipa grandis | 10.59 |
4 | 克氏针茅 Stipa krylovii | 10.40 |
5 | 野韭 Allium ramosum | 8.84 |
6 | 羊草 Leymus chinensis | 6.86 |
7 | 戈壁针茅 Stipa gobica | 5.53 |
8 | 双齿葱 Allium bidentatum | 5.23 |
9 | 木地肤 Kochia prostrata | 4.65 |
10 | 并头黄芩 Scutellaria scordlifloia | 3.98 |
11 | 刺穗藜 Chenopodium aristatum | 3.09 |
12 | 知母 Anemarrhena asphodeloides | 2.60 |
13 | 糙隐子草 Cleistogenes squarros | 1.91 |
14 | 冰草 Agropyron cristatum | 0.89 |
15 | 黄囊薹草 Carex korshinskyi | 0.68 |
16 | 天门冬 Asparagus cochinchinensis | 0.62 |
17 | 狭叶锦鸡儿 Caragana stenophyll | 0.56 |
18 | 无芒隐子草 Cleistogenes songorica | 0.44 |
19 | 细叶葱 Allium tenuissimum | 0.29 |
20 | 乳白花黄芪 Astragalus galactites | 0.12 |
21 | 细叶鸢尾 Iris tenuifolia | 0.11 |
22 | 达乌里胡枝子 Lespedeza davurica | 0.10 |
23 | 灰绿藜 Chenopodium glaucum | 0.09 |
24 | 狗尾草 Setaria viridi | 0.07 |
斑块类型 Type of patches | 方差比率 Variance ratio | 检验统计量 Statistic W | χ2临界值 [χ20.05, N , χ20.95, N] | 结果 Results |
---|---|---|---|---|
大针茅斑块 S. grandis patches | 0.971 4 | 29.141 9 | (17.71, 42.56) | 轻微负关联 Non negative correlation |
克氏针茅斑块 S. krylovii patches | 0.921 2 | 27.637 1 | (17.71, 42.56) | 轻微负关联 Non negative correlation |
戈壁针茅斑块 S. gobica patches | 1.022 3 | 30.670 0 | (17.71, 42.56) | 轻微正关联 Non positive correlation |
总体 Total | 1.070 2 | 96.313 6 | (68.25, 111.02) | 轻微正关联 Non positive correlation |
表2 不同针茅斑块植物种间的总体关联性
Table 2 The overall association for different Stipa patches
斑块类型 Type of patches | 方差比率 Variance ratio | 检验统计量 Statistic W | χ2临界值 [χ20.05, N , χ20.95, N] | 结果 Results |
---|---|---|---|---|
大针茅斑块 S. grandis patches | 0.971 4 | 29.141 9 | (17.71, 42.56) | 轻微负关联 Non negative correlation |
克氏针茅斑块 S. krylovii patches | 0.921 2 | 27.637 1 | (17.71, 42.56) | 轻微负关联 Non negative correlation |
戈壁针茅斑块 S. gobica patches | 1.022 3 | 30.670 0 | (17.71, 42.56) | 轻微正关联 Non positive correlation |
总体 Total | 1.070 2 | 96.313 6 | (68.25, 111.02) | 轻微正关联 Non positive correlation |
图1 Pearson相关分析和Spearman秩相关分析半矩阵图。对角线上方为Spearman秩相关分析半矩阵图, 对角线下方为Pearson相关分半矩阵图。种序号同表1。 ★, 极显著负相关; ▼, 显著负相关; –, 不显著负相关; +, 不显著正相关; ◆, 极显著正相关; ▲, 显著正相关。
Fig. 1 The semi-matrix of Pearson’s correlation coefficients and Spearman’s rank correlation for 24 dominant species. The figures above diagonal line represent semi-matrix of Spearman’s rank correlation, that below diagonal line represent semi-matrix of Pearson’s correlation coefficients. Species code see Table 1. ★, Negative correlation at p = 0.01 (1-tailed); ▼, Negative correlation p = 0.05 (1-tailed); –, Non negative correlation; +, Non positive correlation; ◆, Positive correlation at p = 0.01 (1-tailed); ▲, Positive correlation at p = 0.05 (2-tailed).
图2 3个针茅斑块内种间关联Spearman秩相关分析半矩阵图。 图注同图1。
Fig. 2 The semi-matrix of Spearman’s rank correlation for 24 dominant species in three Stipa patches. Notes see Fig. 1.
图3 3个针茅斑块中主要物种的Spearman秩相关系数星座图。 ………表示显著正关联(p < 0.05); —— 表示极显著正关联(p < 0.01); 种序号同表1。
Fig. 3 The constellation diagram of Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients for dorminant species of three Stipa patches. ……… Positive correlation is significant at 0. 05 level; —— Positive correlation is significant at 0. 01 level; Species code see Table 1.
[1] | An Y (安渊), Li B (李博), Yang C (杨持), Yan ZJ (闫志坚), Han GD (韩国栋) (2002). Influence of grazing rate on population structure of Stipa Grandis. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 26, 163-169. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[2] | Bai YF, Li LH, Huang JH, Chen ZZ (2001). The influence of plant diversity and functional composition on ecosystem stability of four Stipa communities in the Inner Mongolia Plateau. Acta Botanica Sinica (植物学报), 43, 280-287. |
[3] | Bai YF (白永飞), Xu ZX (许志信), Li DX (李德新) (2002). On the small scale spatial heterogeneity of soil moisture, carbon and nitrogen in Stipa communities of the Inner Mongolia Plateau. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 22, 1215-1223. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[4] |
Callaway RM, DeLucia EH, Moore D, Nowak R, Schlesinger WH (1996). Competition and facilitation: contrasting effects of Artemisia tridentata on desert vs. Montane pines. Ecology, 77, 2130-2141.
DOI URL |
[5] | Du DL (杜道林), Liu YC (刘玉成), Li R (李睿) (1995). Studies on the interspecific association of dominant species in a subtropical Castanopsis fargesii forest of Jinyun mountain, China. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 19, 149-157. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[6] | Greig-Smith P (1983). Quantitative Plant Ecology 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London, UK. |
[7] | Guo ZH (郭志华), Zhuo ZD (卓正大), Chen J (陈洁) (1997). Interspecific association of trees in mixed evergreen and deciduous broadleaved forest in Lushan mountain. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 21, 424-432. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[8] |
Hubalek Z (1982). Coefficient of association and similarity, based on binary (presence-absence) data: an evalvation. Biological Reviews, 57, 669-689.
DOI URL |
[9] |
Hurlburt SH (1969). A coefficient of interspecific association. Ecology, 50, 1-9.
DOI URL |
[10] | Kikvidze Z, Nakhutsrishvili G (1998). Facilitation in subnival vegetation patches. Journal of Vegetation Science, 9, 261-264. |
[11] | Li CH (李存焕) (2000). The relationship between primary productivity of plant community and climate fluctuation in Stipa breviflora desert steppe. Inner Mongolia Prataculture (内蒙古草业), (1), 36-40. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[12] | Li JB (李军保), Liu HL (刘洪来), Zhu JZ (朱进忠), Tursunay R (吐尔逊娜依·热依木江), Li H (李海) (2009). Study on interspecific association of spring-autumn pasture under enclosure and recovering conditions in Yili River valley. Pratacutural Science (草业科学), 26(6), 18-24. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] | Li SM (李士美), Xie GD (谢高地), Zhang CX (张彩霞) (2009). Dynamics of the aboveground standing biomass assets of typical grassland. Acta Pratacul Turae Sinica (草业学报), 18(4), 1-8. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[14] | Lin WQ (林伟强), Liu HM (刘惠明), Zhang L (张璐) (2004). Studies on the interspecific association of dominant populations of the secondary forest community in Maofengshan, Guangzhou. Ecological Science (生态科学), 23(1), 42-46. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[15] | Liu Y (刘洋), Hu G (胡刚), Liang SC (梁士楚), Peng M (彭敏), Lu XF (卢学峰), Yue PP (岳鹏鹏) (2007a). Interspecific associations analysis of Stipa purpurea community in Tuotuo River area. Guihaia (广西植物), 27, 720-724. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[16] | Liu Y (刘洋), Peng M (彭敏), Lu XF (卢学峰), Zou FP (邹芳平), Liu DM (刘德铭), Yang SB (杨仕兵), Zhou YB (周玉碧) (2007b). Interspecific association analysis in Stipa purpurea community in Batan area in Qinghai. Pratacul- tural Science (草业科学), 24(2), 1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[17] | Lou YJ (娄彦景), Zhao KY (赵魁义) (2008). Analysis of interspecific associations of Carex lasiocarpa community in recent 30-year succession in Sanjiang Plain. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 27, 509-513. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[18] | Luo TS (骆土寿), Li YD (李意德), Chen DX (陈德祥), Lin MX (林明献), Sun YX (孙云霄) (2005). Interspecific correlation of Dacrycarpus imbricatus plantation community in Hainan Island. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 24, 591-594. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[19] | Mueller-Dombois D, Ellenberg H (1974). Intention and methods of Vegetation Ecology. Translated by Bao XC (鲍显诚)(1986). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[20] | Núñez CI, Aizen MA, Ezcurra C (1999). Species associations and nurse plant effects in patches of high-andean vegetation. Journal of Vegetation Science, 10, 357-364. |
[21] | Schluter D (1984). A variance test for detecting species associations, with some example applications. Ecology, 65, 998-1005. |
[22] | Sun ZW (孙中伟), Li XR (李新荣) (1999). Interspecific association and correlation of shrub layer in the coniferous- broad leaved mixed geobotanical zone of Russia plain. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 19, 55-60. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[23] | Sun ZW (孙中伟), Zhao SD (赵士洞) (1996). Interspecific association and correlation of lime-broad leave Korean pine forest on the northern slope of Changbai Mountain. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 7, 1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[24] | Wang BS (王伯荪), Li MG (李鸣光), Peng SL (彭少麟) (1995). Phytopopulology (植物种群学). Guangdong Higher Education Press, Guangzhou. 198-200. (in Chinese) |
[25] | Wang BS (王伯荪) (1989). Phytosociology (植物群落学). Zhongshan University Press, Guangzhou. 115-120. (in Chinese) |
[26] | Wang FL (王凤兰), Niu JM (牛建明), Zhang Q (张庆) (2009). Study on interspecific relationships among main species of Stipa breviflora communities. Acta Agriculturae Boreali- Sinica (华北农学报), 24, 159-164. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[27] | Wang GH (王国宏), Ren JZ (任继周), Zhang Z (张自) (2001). A study on the population diversity of plant communityin Hexi mountain-oasis-desert area. I. General features. Acta Agrestla Sinca (草业学报), 10(1), 1-12. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[28] | Xilin tana (锡林塔娜), Meng R (蒙荣), Mu ZJ (慕宗杰) (2008). Correlation analysis of interspecific relationship of community in Stipa breviflora desert steppe in Siziwang Banner in Inner Mongolia. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science (畜牧与饲料科学), 2(6), 6-9. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[29] | Xing F (邢福), Guo JX (郭继勋) (2001). Comparative analysis of interspecific association for three grazing successional stages of Cleistogenes squarrosa steppe. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 25, 693-698. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[30] | Yuan WP (袁文平), Zhou GS (周广胜) (2005). Responses of three Stipa communities net primary productivity along Northeast China Transect to seasonal distribution of precipitation. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 16, 605-609. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[31] | Zhang HM (张红梅), Zhao ML (赵萌莉), Li QF (李青丰), Han B (韩冰) (2003). Morphological variations of Stipa grandis under grazing stress. Grassland of China (中国草地), 25, 13-17. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[32] | Zhang JD (张金屯) (2004). Quantitative Ecology (数量生态学). Science Press, Beijing. 100. (in Chinese) |
[33] | Zhang LX (张丽霞), Zhang F (张峰), Shangguan TL (上官铁梁) (2001). Studies on relationship between species in plant communities of Luya Mountains. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica (西北植物学报), 21, 1085-1091. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[34] | Zhang WG (张卫国), Huang WB (黄文冰), Yang ZY (杨振宇) (2003). The study on the relationship between mini-patch and degradation of pasture. Acta Agrestla Sinica (草业学报), 12(3), 44-50. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[35] | Zhao YG (赵勇钢), Zhao SW (赵世伟), Hua J (华娟), Zhang Y (张扬) (2009). Soil structural properties of enclosed steppe in the semiarid area. Acta Agrestla Sinca (草地学报), 17(1), 106-112. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[36] | Zhou XY (周先叶), Wang BS (王伯荪), Li MG (李鸣光), Jiu QJ (昝启杰) (2000). An analysis of interspecific associations in secondary succession forest communities in Heishiding Natural Reserve, Guangdong Province. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 24, 332-339. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 王丽萍, 乌俊杰, 柴勇, 李家华, 杨昌级, 赵士杰. 高黎贡山中山湿性常绿阔叶林优势种空间分布格局及其关联性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(2): 180-191. |
[2] | 茹雅倩, 薛建国, 葛萍, 李钰霖, 李东旭, 韩鹏, 杨天润, 储伟, 陈章, 张晓琳, 李昂, 黄建辉. 高频轮牧对典型草原生产生态效果的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(2): 171-179. |
[3] | 郑宁, 李素英, 王鑫厅, 吕世海, 赵鹏程, 臧琛, 许玉珑, 何静, 秦文昊, 高恒睿. 基于环境因子对叶绿素影响的典型草原植物生活型优势研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(8): 951-960. |
[4] | 范敏, 卢奕曈, 王照华, 黄颖琪, 彭羽, 尚佳欣, 张杨. 浑善达克沙地中部斑块格局影响植物多样性及功能性状[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(1): 51-61. |
[5] | 张景慧, 王铮, 黄永梅, 陈慧颖, 李智勇, 梁存柱. 草地利用方式对温性典型草原优势种植物功能性状的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(8): 818-833. |
[6] | 熊星烁, 蔡宏宇, 李耀琪, 马文红, 牛克昌, 陈迪马, 刘娜娜, 苏香燕, 景鹤影, 冯晓娟, 曾辉, 王志恒. 内蒙古典型草原植物叶片碳氮磷化学计量特征的季节动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(11): 1138-1153. |
[7] | 苗百岭, 梁存柱, 史亚博, 梁茂伟, 刘钟龄. 降水变化对内蒙古典型草原地上生物量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(7): 557-565. |
[8] | 汤永康, 武艳涛, 武魁, 郭之伟, 梁存柱, 王敏杰, 常佩静. 放牧对草地生态系统服务和功能权衡关系的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(5): 408-417. |
[9] | 闫宝龙, 王忠武, 屈志强, 王静, 韩国栋. 围封对内蒙古典型草原与荒漠草原植被-土壤系统碳密度的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(3): 327-336. |
[10] | 李晋波, 姚楠, 赵英, 范庭, 张建国, 兰志龙, 易军, 司炳成. 不同放牧条件下锡林郭勒典型草原土壤水分分布特征及降水入渗估算[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(10): 1033-1042. |
[11] | 刘翔宇, 何东, 田文斌, 宋彦君, 尹芳, 许洺山, 程浚洋, 阎恩荣. 浙江普陀山岛森林木本植物的种间关联格局[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(12): 1219-1227. |
[12] | 乔丽青, 田大栓, 万宏伟, 宝音陶格涛, 潘庆民. 不同载畜率下瓣蕊唐松草的生长和繁殖对策[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(8): 878-887. |
[13] | 白雪, 程军回, 郑淑霞, 詹书侠, 白永飞. 典型草原建群种羊草对氮磷添加的生理生态响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(2): 103-115. |
[14] | 杨婧, 褚鹏飞, 陈迪马, 王明玖, 白永飞. 放牧对内蒙古典型草原α、β和γ多样性的影响机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(2): 188-200. |
[15] | 李文怀, 郑淑霞, 白永飞. 放牧强度和地形对内蒙古典型草原物种多度分布的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(2): 178-187. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19