植物生态学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8): 754-762.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00754 cstr: 32100.14.SP.J.1258.2012.00754
收稿日期:2011-11-18
接受日期:2012-03-27
出版日期:2012-11-18
发布日期:2012-08-21
作者简介:* E-mail: yxshen@xtbg.ac.cn
SHEN You-Xin1,*(
), ZHAO Chun-Yan2
Received:2011-11-18
Accepted:2012-03-27
Online:2012-11-18
Published:2012-08-21
摘要:
持久性土壤种子库(PSSB)是一种重要的植物生活史对策, 很多学者就这种对策对物种适应和进化的影响进行过推理。但种子在土壤中的长时间存留是一种风险行为, 所有的PSSB影响的推理都取决于一个假设, 即PSSB种子萌发的个体的竞争能力没有因为存留损耗而显著降低。为验证这一假设, 该文以紫茎泽兰(Eupatorium adenophorum)为研究材料, 比较了埋藏1年和3年的PSSB种子萌发的个体与同母体的当年新种子萌发的个体之间在无竞争和4种密度制约竞争条件下的株高和生物量的差异。结果显示, 无论株高还是生物量, PSSB种子萌发的个体较同母体的新种子萌发的个体均有所降低, 但在多数检测时间内的降低程度未达到显著水平, 表明紫茎泽兰PSSB种子萌发的个体相对于同母体的新种子萌发的个体的竞争能力无显著下降。
沈有信, 赵春燕. 持久性土壤种子库种子萌发的个体竞争能力会衰减吗?——以紫茎泽兰为例. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(8): 754-762. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00754
SHEN You-Xin, ZHAO Chun-Yan. Will competitiveness of resulting plants of persistent soil seed bank decline? Example from Eupatorium adenophorum. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2012, 36(8): 754-762. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00754
图1 埋藏1年的持久性土壤种子库(PSSB)种子萌发的个体与当年新种子萌发的个体之间的竞争试验设计。
Fig. 1 Diagram showing the competition arrangement between plants resulting from one year buried persistent soil seed bank (PSSB) and fresh seeds.
| 处理 Treatment | 距离播种天数 Days after sowing (d) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45 | 55 | 65 | 75 | 85 | 105 | 125 | 140 | 155 | 165 | ||
| D A A × D | df F p df F p df F p | 4 140.466 0.000 1 44.336 0.000 4 125.375 0.000 | 4 70.423 0.000 1 15.829 0.000 4 0.313 0.868 | 4 8.379 0.000 1 4.102 0.045 4 11.765 0.000 | 4 30.907 0.000 1 2.894 0.092 4 2.853 0.027 | 4 28.287 0.000 1 0.415 0.521 4 1.531 0.201 | 4 18.245 0.000 1 0.045 0.833 4 6.472 0.000 | 4 6.036 0.001 1 2.107 0.153 4 3.410 0.016 | 4 101.397 0.000 1 4.262 0.044 4 0.419 0.794 | 4 1.632 0.210 1 0.318 0.580 4 0.920 0.474 | 4 2.101 0.131 1 2.622 0.126 4 4.326 0.016 |
表1 播种不同天数后紫茎泽兰的密度(D)与种子来源类型(A) (新种子和埋藏1年的持久性土壤种子库种子)对株高的影响
Table 1 Effects of density (D) and seed source type (A) (new seeds vs one year old seeds of persistent soil seed bank) on plant height of Eupatorium adenophorum at different days after sowing
| 处理 Treatment | 距离播种天数 Days after sowing (d) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45 | 55 | 65 | 75 | 85 | 105 | 125 | 140 | 155 | 165 | ||
| D A A × D | df F p df F p df F p | 4 140.466 0.000 1 44.336 0.000 4 125.375 0.000 | 4 70.423 0.000 1 15.829 0.000 4 0.313 0.868 | 4 8.379 0.000 1 4.102 0.045 4 11.765 0.000 | 4 30.907 0.000 1 2.894 0.092 4 2.853 0.027 | 4 28.287 0.000 1 0.415 0.521 4 1.531 0.201 | 4 18.245 0.000 1 0.045 0.833 4 6.472 0.000 | 4 6.036 0.001 1 2.107 0.153 4 3.410 0.016 | 4 101.397 0.000 1 4.262 0.044 4 0.419 0.794 | 4 1.632 0.210 1 0.318 0.580 4 0.920 0.474 | 4 2.101 0.131 1 2.622 0.126 4 4.326 0.016 |
| 处理 Treatment | 距离播种天数 Days after sowing (d) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32 | 57 | 71 | 86 | 101 | 116 | 130 | 145 | 160 | 175 | ||
| D A A × D | df F p df F p df F p | 4 4.580 0.002 1 0.667 0.415 4 0.901 0.465 | 4 7.695 0.000 1 3.367 0.069 4 0.969 0.427 | 4 32.120 0.000 1 4.305 0.040 4 0.327 0.859 | 4 77.719 0.000 1 4.567 0.035 4 0.357 0.839 | 4 45.207 0.000 1 3.539 0.064 4 0.290 0.884 | 4 45.046 0.000 1 4.524 0.037 4 0.468 0.759 | 4 36.001 0.000 1 3.749 0.059 4 0.324 0.861 | 4 37.387 0.000 1 3.803 0.058 4 0.369 0.830 | 4 24.170 0.000 1 0.377 0.547 4 0.512 0.728 | 4 26.046 0.000 1 0.106 0.748 4 0.317 0.863 |
表2 播种不同天数后紫茎泽兰的密度(D)与种子来源类型(A) (新种子和埋藏3年的持久性土壤种子库种子)对株高的影响
Table 2 Effects of density (D) and seed source type (A) (new seeds vs three years old seeds of persistent soil seed bank) on plant height of Eupatorium adenophorum at different days after sowing
| 处理 Treatment | 距离播种天数 Days after sowing (d) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32 | 57 | 71 | 86 | 101 | 116 | 130 | 145 | 160 | 175 | ||
| D A A × D | df F p df F p df F p | 4 4.580 0.002 1 0.667 0.415 4 0.901 0.465 | 4 7.695 0.000 1 3.367 0.069 4 0.969 0.427 | 4 32.120 0.000 1 4.305 0.040 4 0.327 0.859 | 4 77.719 0.000 1 4.567 0.035 4 0.357 0.839 | 4 45.207 0.000 1 3.539 0.064 4 0.290 0.884 | 4 45.046 0.000 1 4.524 0.037 4 0.468 0.759 | 4 36.001 0.000 1 3.749 0.059 4 0.324 0.861 | 4 37.387 0.000 1 3.803 0.058 4 0.369 0.830 | 4 24.170 0.000 1 0.377 0.547 4 0.512 0.728 | 4 26.046 0.000 1 0.106 0.748 4 0.317 0.863 |
图2 不同种植密度下埋藏1年的持久性土壤种子库(PSSB)种子萌发的个体与新种子萌发的个体株高比较(平均值±标准误差)。A, 对照。B, 0.25株·cm-2。C, 1株·cm-2。D, 4株·cm-2。E, 8株·cm-2。
Fig. 2 Comparisons of plant height of plants resulting from one year old seeds of persistent soil seed bank (PSSB) and resulting from fresh seeds at different planting densities (mean ± SE). A, Control. B, 0.25 plants·cm-2. C, 1 plant·cm-2. D, 4 plants·cm-2. E, 8 plants·cm-2.
图3 不同种植密度下埋藏3年的持久性土壤种子库(PSSB)种子萌发的个体与新种子萌发的个体的株高比较(平均值±标准误差)。A, 对照。B, 0.10株·cm-2。C, 0.17株·cm-2。D, 0.60株·cm-2。E, 2.17株·cm-2。
Fig. 3 Comparisons of plant height of plants resulting from three years old seeds of persistent soil seed bank (PSSB) and resulting from fresh seeds at different planting densities (mean ± SE). A, Control. B, 0.10 plants·cm-2. C, 0.17 plants·cm-2. D, 0.60 plants·cm-2. E, 2.17 plants·cm-2.
| 处理 Treatment | 距离播种天数 Days after sowing (d) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85 | 115 | 145 | 175 | ||
| D A A × D | df F p df F p df F p | 4 2.047 0.126 1 0.383 0.543 4 0.025 0.999 | 4 3.386 0.029 1 25.317 0.000 4 0.937 0.463 | 3 15.829 0.000 1 5.046 0.036 3 3.586 0.023 | 4 12.077 0.000 1 0.338 0.567 4 0.343 0.846 |
表3 播种不同天数后紫茎泽兰的密度(D)与种子来源类型(A) (新种子和埋藏1年的持久性土壤种子库种子)对生物量的影响
Table 3 Effects of density (D) and seed source type (A) (new seeds vs one year old seeds of persistent soil seed bank) on biomass of Eupatorium adenophorum at different days after sowing
| 处理 Treatment | 距离播种天数 Days after sowing (d) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85 | 115 | 145 | 175 | ||
| D A A × D | df F p df F p df F p | 4 2.047 0.126 1 0.383 0.543 4 0.025 0.999 | 4 3.386 0.029 1 25.317 0.000 4 0.937 0.463 | 3 15.829 0.000 1 5.046 0.036 3 3.586 0.023 | 4 12.077 0.000 1 0.338 0.567 4 0.343 0.846 |
| 处理 Treatment | 距离播种天数 Days after sowing (d) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58 | 86 | 117 | 145 | 175 | ||
| D A A × D | df F p df F p df F p | 4 12.552 0.000 1 3.232 0.088 4 0.366 0.829 | 4 36.873 0.000 1 0.022 0.883 4 0.562 0.693 | 3 47.930 0.000 1 0.029 0.868 3 0.025 0.995 | 4 376.202 0.000 1 5.897 0.027 4 0.546 0.658 | 4 62.320 0.000 1 0.201 0.659 4 0.117 0.975 |
表4 播种不同天数后紫茎泽兰的密度(D)与种子来源类型(A) (新种子和埋藏3年的持久性土壤种子库种子)对生物量的影响
Table 4 Effects of density (D) and seed source type (A) (new seeds vs three years old seeds of persistent soil seed bank) on biomass of Eupatorium adenophorum at different days after sowing
| 处理 Treatment | 距离播种天数 Days after sowing (d) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58 | 86 | 117 | 145 | 175 | ||
| D A A × D | df F p df F p df F p | 4 12.552 0.000 1 3.232 0.088 4 0.366 0.829 | 4 36.873 0.000 1 0.022 0.883 4 0.562 0.693 | 3 47.930 0.000 1 0.029 0.868 3 0.025 0.995 | 4 376.202 0.000 1 5.897 0.027 4 0.546 0.658 | 4 62.320 0.000 1 0.201 0.659 4 0.117 0.975 |
图4 不同种植密度下埋藏1年的持久性土壤种子库(PSSB)种子萌发的个体与新种子萌发的个体的生物量比较(平均值±标准误差)。A, 对照。B, 0.25株·cm-2。C, 1株·cm-2。D, 4株·cm-2。E, 8株·cm-2。
Fig. 4 Comparisons of individual biomass of plants resulting from one year old seeds of persistent soil seed bank (PSSB) and resulting from fresh seeds at different planting densities (mean ± SE). A, Control. B, 0.25 plants·cm-2. C, 1 plant·cm-2. D, 4 plants·cm-2. E, 8 plants·cm-2.
图5 不同种植密度下埋藏3年的持久性土壤种子库(PSSB)种子萌发的个体与新种子萌发的个体的生物量比较(平均值±标准误差)。A, 对照。B, 0.10株·cm-2。C, 0.17株·cm-2。D, 0.60株·cm-2。E, 2.17株·cm-2。
Fig. 5 Comparisons of individual biomass of plants resulting from three years old seeds of persistent soil seed bank (PSSB) and resulting from fresh seeds at different planting densities (mean ± SE). A, Control. B, 0.10 plants·cm-2. C, 0.17 plants·cm-2. D, 0.60 plants·cm-2. E, 2.17 plants·cm-2.
| [1] | Baskin CC, Baskin JM (1998). Seeds: Ecology, Biogeo- graphy, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination. Academic Press, San Diego. |
| [2] | Berjak P, Villiers TA (1972a). Ageing in plant embryos. IV. Loss of regulatory control in aged embryos. The New Phytologist, 71, 1069-1074. |
| [3] | Berjak P, Villiers TA (1972b). Ageing in plant embryos. V. Lysis of the cytoplasm in non-viable embryos. The New Phytologist, 71, 1075-1079. |
| [4] | Berjak P, Villiers TA (1972c). Ageing in plant embryos. II. Age-induced damage and its repair during early germination. The New Phytologist, 71, 135-144. |
| [5] | Cohen D (1966). Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 12, 119-129. |
| [6] | Cohen D (1968). A general model of optimal reproduction in a randomly varying environment. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 56, 219-228. |
| [7] | Dang WG (党伟光), Gao XM (高贤明), Wang JF (王瑾芳), Li AF (李爱芳) (2008). Soil seed bank traits in an area invaded by Eupatorium adenophorum. Biodiversity Science (生物多样性), 16, 126-132. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [8] | Harper JL (1977). Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, New York. |
| [9] | Kivilaan A, Bandurski RS (1981). The one hundred year period for Dr. WJ Beal’s seed viability experiment. American Journal of Botany, 68, 1290-1292. |
| [10] | McGraw JB, Vavrek MC, Bennington CC (1991). Ecolo- gical genetic variation in seed banks. I. Establishment of a time transect. Journal of Ecology, 79, 617-625. |
| [11] | Onaindia M, Amezaga I (2000). Seasonal variation in the seed banks of native woodland and coniferous plantations in Northern Spain. Forest Ecology and Management, 126, 163-172. |
| [12] | Philippi T (1993). Bet-hedging germination of desert annuals: beyond the first year. The American Natur- alist, 142, 474-487. |
| [13] | Qiang S (强胜) (1998). The history and status of the study on crofton weed (Eupatorium adenophorum Spreng) a worst worldwide weed. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research (武汉植物学研究), 16, 366-372. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [14] | Rees M, Long MJ (1992). Germination biology and the ecology of annual plants. The American Naturalist, 139, 484-508. |
| [15] | Rice KJ, Dyer AR (2001). Seed aging, delayed germination and reduced competitive ability in Bromus tectorum. Plant Ecology, 155, 237-243. |
| [16] | Shen YX, Zhao CY, Liu WY (2011). Seed vigor and plant competitiveness resulting from seeds of Eupatorium adenophorum in a persistent soil seed bank. Flora, 206, 935-942. |
| [17] | Shen YX, Liu WY, Baskin JM, Baskin CC, Cao M (2006). Persistent soil seed banks of the globally significant invasive species, Eupatorium adenophorum, in Yunnan Province, southwestern China. Seed Science Research, 16, 157-162. |
| [18] | Shen YX (沈有信), Liu WY (刘文耀) (2004). Persistent soil seed bank of Eupatorium adenophorum. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 28, 768-772. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [19] | Telewski FW, Zeevaart JAD (2002). The 120-yr period for Dr. Beal’s seed viability experiment. American Journal of Botany, 89, 1285-1288. |
| [20] | Thompson K, Grime JP (1979). Seasonal variation in the seed banks of herbaceous species in ten contrasting habitats. Journal of Ecology, 67, 893-921. |
| [21] | Venable DL, Brown JS (1988). The selective interactions of dispersal, dormancy, and seed size as adaptations for reducing risk in variable environments. The American Naturalist, 131, 360-384. |
| [22] | Walck JL, Baskin JM, Baskin CC, Hidayati SN (2005). Defining transient and persistent seed banks in species with pronounced seasonal dormancy and germination patterns. Seed Science Research, 15, 189-196. |
| [23] | Wang J (王俊), Bai Y (白瑜) (2006). The hot topics and perspectives of soil seed bank research. Ecology and Environment (生态环境), 15, 1372-1379. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [24] | Wang S (王硕), Gao XM (高贤明), Wang JF (王瑾芳), Dang WG (党伟光) (2009). Characteristics of soil seed banks of crofton weed and their effects on seedlings. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology (植物生态学报), 33, 380-38. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [25] | Wang X (王玺), Zhao ZY (赵增煜) (1990). Studies on vigour change pattern of soybean seed in storage and effect of PEG treatment. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University (沈阳农业大学学报), 21, 207-213. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [26] | Xu ML (许美玲) (2006). Study on germination rule and aging for tobacco seeds. Seed (种子), 25, 9-13. (in Chinese) |
| [27] | Zhang L (张玲), Li GH (李广贺), Zhang X (张旭) (2004). A review on soil seed banks study. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 23, 114-120. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | 张静, 陈洁, 李艳朋, 盘李军, 许涵, 李意德, 何海生. 南亚热带针阔混交人工林植物生物量比较及其影响因子分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(2): 400-416. |
| [2] | 徐恩相, 周蕾, 章晓炜, 张国萍, 仲杜伟, 黄智, 刘派, 迟永刚. 基于不同生育阶段冠层光谱和碳通量的水稻产量估算[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(1): 82-93. |
| [3] | 张法伟, 李红琴, 祝景彬, 樊博, 周华坤, 李英年, 梁乃申. 氮添加和降水改变对高寒草甸生态系统地上与地下碳储的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1399-1409. |
| [4] | 邢强, 赵斌, 胡永红, 杨君, 秦俊, 刘何铭, 王红兵, 周鹏. 华东地区两种典型立体绿化植物根系性状特征及对新型土壤基质的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1498-1514. |
| [5] | 宋珊珊, 唐志尧. 河北塞罕坝草甸草原根际土壤真菌与植物地上生物量的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1461-1471. |
| [6] | 朱瑞德, 杨俊薇, 刘宵含, 陈冰瑞, 池秀莲, 田地, 杨光, 程蒙, 戴亚峰, 王诗文. 霍山石斛设施和林下栽培模式中养分对植物-微生物关联的调控[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1434-1447. |
| [7] | 樊月玲, 蒋正德, 叶佳舒, 郑立臣, 陈欣. 2005-2015年下辽河平原农田长期观测样地主要农作物收获期性状和产量数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(8): 1271-1282. |
| [8] | 马腾飞, 郝杰, 刁华杰, 宁亚楠, $\boxed{\hbox{王常慧}}$, 董宽虎. 晋北农牧交错带草地土壤无机氮含量的季节变化及其对放牧强度的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(6): 965-974. |
| [9] | 刘新月, 王立平, 刘春和, 孙艳丽, 刘鹏, 田赟, 贾昕, 查天山, 钱多. 北京不同林龄人工林生物量空间格局及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(6): 939-951. |
| [10] | 陈文义, 王智勇, 周梦岩, 麻文俊, 王军辉, 罗志斌, 周婧. 幼龄楸树生物量分配规律与异速生长模型[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(2): 356-366. |
| [11] | 郝毅晴, 刘伟, 杨阳, 安冰儿, 范冰, 李超, 崔久辉, 程延彬, 孙佳美, 潘庆民. 有机肥和无机肥对退化草原羊草种群密度和个体生物量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(1): 148-158. |
| [12] | 文佳, 张新娜, 王娟, 赵秀海, 张春雨. 性状调节幼苗存活率对邻体竞争和环境的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(6): 719-729. |
| [13] | 王袼, 胡姝娅, 李阳, 陈晓鹏, 李红玉, 董宽虎, 何念鹏, 王常慧. 不同类型草原土壤净氮矿化速率的温度敏感性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 523-533. |
| [14] | 梁逸娴, 王传宽, 臧妙涵, 上官虹玉, 刘逸潇, 全先奎. 落叶松径向生长和生物量分配对气候变暖的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 459-468. |
| [15] | 黄玲, 王榛, 马泽, 杨发林, 李岚, SEREKPAYEV Nurlan, NOGAYEV Adilbek, 侯扶江. 长期放牧和氮添加对黄土高原典型草原长芒草种群生长的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(3): 317-330. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2026 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19