植物生态学报 ›› 2005, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 630-635.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2005.0084
收稿日期:
2004-02-23
接受日期:
2004-07-16
出版日期:
2005-02-23
发布日期:
2005-07-31
通讯作者:
曹卫星
基金资助:
LI Wei-Guo, DAI Ting-Bo, ZHU Yan, CAO Wei-Xing()
Received:
2004-02-23
Accepted:
2004-07-16
Online:
2005-02-23
Published:
2005-07-31
Contact:
CAO Wei-Xing
About author:
* E-mail: caow@njau.edu.cn摘要:
在中国、日本、泰国不同生态环境下进行多品种籼型和粳型水稻(Oryza sativa)的区域种植试验,通过分析水稻籽粒蛋白质含量与纬度、海拔、抽穗后温度和太阳辐射等气候生态因子的相互关系,确立了影响水稻籽粒蛋白质积累的主要气候生态因子函数,并使用权重系数来进一步修订各气候生态因子对水稻籽粒蛋白质的作用,构建出基于生态效应(主要气候生态因子函数)的水稻籽粒蛋白质含量预测模型。利用不同年份、不同生态点、不同品种类型的试验资料对所建模型进行了检验,籼稻和粳稻籽粒蛋白质含量的预测误差RMSE平均分别为0.27%和0.24%;籼稻试验点和粳稻试验点的预测误差平均为0.25%和0.22%,表明模型总体上具有较好的预测性和实用性。
李卫国, 戴廷波, 朱艳, 曹卫星. 基于生态效应的水稻籽粒蛋白质含量预测模型研究. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(4): 630-635. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2005.0084
LI Wei-Guo, DAI Ting-Bo, ZHU Yan, CAO Wei-Xing. AN ECOLOGICAL MODEL FOR PREDICTING PROTEIN CONTENT IN RICE GRAINS. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2005, 29(4): 630-635. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2005.0084
籼稻 Indica rice | 决定系数 | 极值 Ymax | 籼稻 Indica rice | 决定系数 | 极值 Ymax | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
y1=-0.006 8 | 0.693 6* | 8.116 | y1=-0.005 6 | 0.895 2** | 8.062 | ||||||||||||
y2=2E-06 | 0.767 2* | 7.085 | y2=8E-07 | 0.102 7 | 8.017 | ||||||||||||
y3=6E-09 | 0.942 1** | 6.052 | y3=3E-09 | 0.305 5 | 7.479 | ||||||||||||
y4=-0.055 1 | 0.905 6** | 7.848 | y4=-0.033 9 | 0.686 9* | 8.148 | ||||||||||||
y5=-0.073 | 0.871 9** | 7.955 | y5=-0.054 5 | 0.835 8** | 8.331 | ||||||||||||
y6=-0.054 9 | 0.846 8** | 7.854 | y6=-0.033 7 | 0.672 2* | 8.181 | ||||||||||||
y7=-0.089 4x7+8.4843 | 0.409 7 | 8.005 | y7=-0.084 6x7+8.9531 | 0.409 7 | 8.241 | ||||||||||||
y8=0.244 8 | 0.110 8 | 7.984 | y8=0.237 3 | 0.300 9 | 8.195 |
表1 不同类型水稻籽粒蛋白质含量与气候因子的关系函数
Table 1 Relationship equation between climatic factors and grain protein content in different rice cultivars
籼稻 Indica rice | 决定系数 | 极值 Ymax | 籼稻 Indica rice | 决定系数 | 极值 Ymax | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
y1=-0.006 8 | 0.693 6* | 8.116 | y1=-0.005 6 | 0.895 2** | 8.062 | ||||||||||||
y2=2E-06 | 0.767 2* | 7.085 | y2=8E-07 | 0.102 7 | 8.017 | ||||||||||||
y3=6E-09 | 0.942 1** | 6.052 | y3=3E-09 | 0.305 5 | 7.479 | ||||||||||||
y4=-0.055 1 | 0.905 6** | 7.848 | y4=-0.033 9 | 0.686 9* | 8.148 | ||||||||||||
y5=-0.073 | 0.871 9** | 7.955 | y5=-0.054 5 | 0.835 8** | 8.331 | ||||||||||||
y6=-0.054 9 | 0.846 8** | 7.854 | y6=-0.033 7 | 0.672 2* | 8.181 | ||||||||||||
y7=-0.089 4x7+8.4843 | 0.409 7 | 8.005 | y7=-0.084 6x7+8.9531 | 0.409 7 | 8.241 | ||||||||||||
y8=0.244 8 | 0.110 8 | 7.984 | y8=0.237 3 | 0.300 9 | 8.195 |
籼稻蛋白质因子函数 Factor equation of Indic rice | ri | 粳稻蛋白质因子函数 Factor equation of Japonica rice | ri |
---|---|---|---|
f(x1)=-0.000 84 | 0.139 8 | f(x1)=-0.000 695 | 0.262 3 |
f(x2)= 2.82E-07 | 0.152 6 | ||
f(x3)= 9.2E-10 | 0.187 4 | f(x3)= 4.02E-10 | 0.09 |
f(x4)=-0.007 02 | 0.180 2 | f(x4)=-0.004 16 | 0.202 3 |
f(x5)=-0.009 18 | 0.168 5 | f(x5)=-0.006 54 | 0.246 1 |
f(x6)=-0.006 99 | 0.173 4 | f(x6)=-0.004 12 | 0.198 |
表2 不同类型水稻籽粒蛋白质含量的气候因子函数
Table 2 Climatic factor equations for grain protein content in different rice cultivars
籼稻蛋白质因子函数 Factor equation of Indic rice | ri | 粳稻蛋白质因子函数 Factor equation of Japonica rice | ri |
---|---|---|---|
f(x1)=-0.000 84 | 0.139 8 | f(x1)=-0.000 695 | 0.262 3 |
f(x2)= 2.82E-07 | 0.152 6 | ||
f(x3)= 9.2E-10 | 0.187 4 | f(x3)= 4.02E-10 | 0.09 |
f(x4)=-0.007 02 | 0.180 2 | f(x4)=-0.004 16 | 0.202 3 |
f(x5)=-0.009 18 | 0.168 5 | f(x5)=-0.006 54 | 0.246 1 |
f(x6)=-0.006 99 | 0.173 4 | f(x6)=-0.004 12 | 0.198 |
图1 不同生态区籼稻品种(A)和粳稻品种(B)籽粒蛋白质含量模拟值与观测值的比较
Fig.1 Comparison between simulated and measured grain protein contents of Indica rice (A) and Japonica rice (B) under different eco-environments
籼稻 Indica rice | RMSE (%) | 籼稻种植区 Indica rice region | RMSE (%) | 籼稻 Indica rice | RMSE (%) | 籼稻种植区 Indica rice region | RMSE (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
`NP65' | 0.15 | 岛根Shimane | 0.24 | `BA' | 0.14 | 岩手Iwate | 0.12 |
`SK' | 0.15 | 南京Nanjing | 0.26 | `TEN' | 0.15 | 岛根Shimane | 0.23 |
`CH86' | 0.30 | 岩手Iwate | 0.29 | `NIP' | 0.28 | 南京Nanjing | 0.24 |
`IR72' | 0.37 | 京都Kyoto | 0.30 | `WA' | 0.38 | 京都Kyoto | 0.29 |
`TAK' | 0.40 | ||||||
`扬稻6号' `Yangdao 6' | 0.20 | 金坛Jintan | 0.16 | `早丰9号' `Zaofeng 9' | 0.14 | 昆山Kunshan | 0.14 |
`丰优香占' `Fengyouxiangzhan' | 0.21 | 丹阳Danyang | 0.20 | `广陵香粳' `Guanglingxiangjing' | 0.18 | 泗洪Sihong | 0.18 |
`泗稻10号' `Sidao 10' | 0.23 | 泗洪Sihong | 0.22 | `连粳3号' `Lianjing 3' | 0.25 | 丹阳Danyang | 0.20 |
`常优1号' `Changyou 1' | 0.24 | 昆山Kunshan | 0.34 | `武育粳3号' `Wuyujing 3' | 0.29 | 金坛Jintan | 0.36 |
`汕优63' `Shanyou 63' | 0.41 | `武育粳7号' `Wuyujing 7' | 0.39 | ||||
平均值 Average | 0.27 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.22 |
表3 不同品种不同种植区水稻籽粒蛋白质含量预测的RMSE
Table 3 RMSEs for protein contents of different rice cultivars under different environments
籼稻 Indica rice | RMSE (%) | 籼稻种植区 Indica rice region | RMSE (%) | 籼稻 Indica rice | RMSE (%) | 籼稻种植区 Indica rice region | RMSE (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
`NP65' | 0.15 | 岛根Shimane | 0.24 | `BA' | 0.14 | 岩手Iwate | 0.12 |
`SK' | 0.15 | 南京Nanjing | 0.26 | `TEN' | 0.15 | 岛根Shimane | 0.23 |
`CH86' | 0.30 | 岩手Iwate | 0.29 | `NIP' | 0.28 | 南京Nanjing | 0.24 |
`IR72' | 0.37 | 京都Kyoto | 0.30 | `WA' | 0.38 | 京都Kyoto | 0.29 |
`TAK' | 0.40 | ||||||
`扬稻6号' `Yangdao 6' | 0.20 | 金坛Jintan | 0.16 | `早丰9号' `Zaofeng 9' | 0.14 | 昆山Kunshan | 0.14 |
`丰优香占' `Fengyouxiangzhan' | 0.21 | 丹阳Danyang | 0.20 | `广陵香粳' `Guanglingxiangjing' | 0.18 | 泗洪Sihong | 0.18 |
`泗稻10号' `Sidao 10' | 0.23 | 泗洪Sihong | 0.22 | `连粳3号' `Lianjing 3' | 0.25 | 丹阳Danyang | 0.20 |
`常优1号' `Changyou 1' | 0.24 | 昆山Kunshan | 0.34 | `武育粳3号' `Wuyujing 3' | 0.29 | 金坛Jintan | 0.36 |
`汕优63' `Shanyou 63' | 0.41 | `武育粳7号' `Wuyujing 7' | 0.39 | ||||
平均值 Average | 0.27 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.22 |
图2 江苏省不同稻区籼稻品种(A)和粳稻品种(B)籽粒蛋白质含量模拟值与观测值的比较
Fig.2 Comparison between simulated and measured grain protein content of Indica rice (A) and Japonica rice (B) under different environments in Jangsu Province
[1] | Borah R (1995). Effect of light stress on chlorophyll starch, protein content and grain yield in rice. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 38,320-321. |
[2] | Cai YX (蔡一霞), Zhu QS (朱庆森), Wang ZQ (王志琴), Yang JC(杨建昌), Zheng L (郑雷), Qian WC(钱卫成) (2002). Effects of soil moisture on rice quality during grain-filling period. Acta Agronomica Sinica (作物学报), 28,601-608. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[3] | Cheng FM(程方民), Zhong LJ(钟连进) (2001). Variation of rice quality traits under different climatic conditions and its main effect factors. Chinese Journal of Rice Science (中国水稻科学), 15,187-191. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[4] | Cheng FM(程方民), Zhu BY(朱碧岩) (1998). Present research on the effect of meteoroecological factors on rice quality. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology (中国农业气象), 19,39-45. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[5] | Cheng FM(程方民), Liu ZH(刘正辉), Zhang SW(张嵩午) (2002). The evaluation of climatic-ecology condition for the rice quality formation and its distribution laws in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 22,636-642. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[6] | Gomez K (1977). Effect of environment on protein and amylose content of rice. In: Juliaxo BO ed. Proceeding of the Workshop on Chemical Aspects of Rice Grain Quality. International Rice Research Institute, Philippines,59-65. |
[7] | Huang FS(黄发松), Sun ZX(孙宗修), Hu PS(胡培松), Tang SQ(唐绍清) (1998). Present situations and prospects for the research on rice quality forming. Chinese Journal of Rice Science (中国水稻科学), 12,172-176. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[8] | Meng YL(孟亚利), Zhou ZG(周治国) (1997). Relationship between rice quality and temperature during seed setting period. Chinese Journal of Rice Science (中国水稻科学), 11,51-54. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[9] | Ren WJ (任万军), Yang WY(杨文钰), Xu JW(徐精文), Fan GQ(樊高琼), Ma ZH(马周华) (2003). Effect of low light on grain growth and quality in rice. Acta Agronomica Sinica (作物学报), 29,785-790. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[10] | Shen XP(沈新平), Ding T(丁涛), Zhang HC(张洪程), Huo ZY(霍中洋), Tao XJ(陶小军) (2003). Study on latitudinal change in amylose and protein content of several dominant rice varieties cultivated in Jiangsu Province. Journal of Yangzhou University (扬州大学学报), 1,37-40. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[11] | Tang YH(唐永红), Zhang SW(张嵩午) (1997). The dynamic of the rice quality during the ripening of rice kernel. Chinese Journal of Rice Science (中国水稻科学), 11,28-32. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[12] | Xu FX(徐富贤), Zheng JK(郑家奎), Zhu YC(朱永川), Wang GX(王贵雄) (2003). Effect of atmospheric phenomena factors on the milling quality and the appearance quality of medium Indica Hybrid Rice during the period from full heading to maturity. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 27,73-77. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] | Yamagata H (1982). Biosynthesis of storage protein in developing rice seeds. Plant Physiology, 70,1094-1100. |
[14] | Zhang L(张磊), Wu DY(吴冬云), Zhu BY(朱碧岩), Zhang MG(张铭光), Li JQ(黎杰强) (2002). Effects of temperature and light on the dynamic change in soluble protein and sugar in rice leaves and grains during the milk-filling stage. Journal of South China Normal University (华南师范大学学报), 2,98-101. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 白娥, 薛冰. 土地利用与土地覆盖变化对生态系统的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(5): 543-552. |
[2] | 熊淑萍, 王静, 王小纯, 丁世杰, 马新明. 耕作方式及施氮量对砂姜黑土区小麦氮代谢及籽粒产量和蛋白质含量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(7): 767-775. |
[3] | 沙依然·外力,李秉柏,张佳华,杨沈斌. 水稻模拟模型在高温敏感性研究中的应用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(5): 515-528. |
[4] | 张佳蕾,李向东,杨传婷,高芳,张凤,王媛媛,孙莲强. 两种品质类型花生品质形成与子叶细胞超微结构的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(8): 768-776. |
[5] | 邹媛媛, 刘琳, 刘洋, 赵亮, 邓启云, 吴俊, 庄文, 宋未. 不同水稻品种种子固有细菌群落的多样性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(8): 880-890. |
[6] | 隗溟,廖学群,李冬霞,段海龙. 水稻分蘖节位生产力比较[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(4): 324-332. |
[7] | 蒋样明, 崔伟宏, 董前林. 基于空间技术的烤烟种植生态环境综合评价分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(1): 47-54. |
[8] | 顾东祥, 汤亮, 徐其军, 雷晓俊, 曹卫星, 朱艳. 水氮处理下不同品种水稻根系生长分布特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(5): 558-566. |
[9] | 陈洁, 汤亮, 刘小军, 曹卫星, 朱艳. 基于植株碳流的水稻籽粒淀粉积累模拟模型[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(4): 431-440. |
[10] | 王维, 蔡一霞, 杨建昌, 朱庆森. 结实期土壤水分亏缺影响水稻籽粒灌浆的生理原因[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(2): 195-202. |
[11] | 杨杰, 田永超, 姚霞, 曹卫星, 朱艳. 利用高光谱参数反演水稻叶片类胡萝卜素含量[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(7): 845-854. |
[12] | 张玉森, 姚霞, 田永超, 曹卫星, 朱艳. 应用近红外光谱预测水稻叶片氮含量[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(6): 704-712. |
[13] | 田永超, 杨杰, 姚霞, 朱艳, 曹卫星. 利用红边面积形状参数估测水稻叶层氮浓度[J]. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(4): 791-801. |
[14] | 张巍巍, 郑飞翔, 王效科, 冯兆忠, 欧阳志云. 臭氧对水稻根系活力、可溶性蛋白含量与抗氧化系统的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(3): 425-432. |
[15] | 蔡昆争, 吴学祝, 骆世明. 不同生育期水分胁迫对水稻根叶渗透调节物质变化的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(2): 491-500. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19