植物生态学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 513-520.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0064
收稿日期:
2006-08-10
接受日期:
2006-11-29
出版日期:
2007-08-10
发布日期:
2007-05-30
通讯作者:
高永
作者简介:
* E-mail: gaoyong315@yahoo.com.cn基金资助:
HU Sheng-Rong1, GAO Yong1,*(), WU Fei2, MI Zhi-Ying1, ZHANG Yu1
Received:
2006-08-10
Accepted:
2006-11-29
Online:
2007-08-10
Published:
2007-05-30
Contact:
GAO Yong
摘要:
在实验室中对两种无芒雀麦本地种(Bromus inermis cv. Xilinguole)和引进种(Bromus stamineus)种子在浓度为0.5%、1.0%、1.5%的Na2SO4、NaCl和MgCl2 3种单盐胁迫下进行发芽实验,结果表明:与对照相比,在以上3种盐胁迫下,随着胁迫浓度的增加,两种无芒雀麦种子的发芽率、发芽指数和发芽值均有不同程度的降低,相对盐害率升高,种子开始发芽的时间推迟且其发芽过程延长;在3种盐中,NaCl的胁迫对两种植物种子萌发的抑制作用最大,其中浓度为1.0% NaCl的胁迫对引进种和本地种无芒雀麦发芽率的抑制分别达到了68.67%和14%,在浓度为1.5%的NaCl胁迫下两种供试植物的发芽率均为零;通过建立不同盐分处理与两种无芒雀麦种子发芽率之间的回归方程得出,引进无芒雀麦种子芽期的耐盐性较本地无芒雀麦强。
胡生荣, 高永, 武飞, 米志英, 张雨. 盐胁迫对两种无芒雀麦种子萌发的影响. 植物生态学报, 2007, 31(3): 513-520. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0064
HU Sheng-Rong, GAO Yong, WU Fei, MI Zhi-Ying, ZHANG Yu. EFFECT OF SALT STRESS ON GERMINATION OF BROMUS STAMINEUS AND BROMUS INERMIS CV. XILINGUOLE. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2007, 31(3): 513-520. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0064
发芽环境 Germination environment | 发芽天数 Germination days (d) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
CK | 75.33 | 80.00 | 81.33 | 82.67 | 82.67 | 82.67 | 82.67 |
A1 | 25.33 | 36.00 | 43.33 | 47.33 | 50.67 | 52.67 | 52.67 |
A2 | 12.67 | 25.33 | 27.33 | 32.00 | 36.67 | 38.67 | 39.33 |
A3 | 3.33 | 3.33 | 5.33 | 11.33 | 17.33 | 20.00 | 22.00 |
B1 | 5.33 | 22.67 | 28.67 | 38.00 | 47.33 | 50.00 | 50.67 |
B2 | 2.00 | 6.00 | 8.00 | 9.33 | 12.00 | 14.00 | 16.00 |
B3 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
C1 | 10.00 | 20.00 | 40.00 | 46.00 | 51.33 | 52.00 | 54.67 |
C2 | 3.33 | 19.33 | 24.67 | 30.67 | 36.00 | 36.00 | 36.00 |
C3 | 5.33 | 10.00 | 19.33 | 25.33 | 29.33 | 34.67 | 34.67 |
表1 不同发芽环境下本地种种子7 d的累积发芽率(%)
Table 1 Accumulating germination percentage (%) of Bromus inermis cv. Xilinguole seeds in 7 days
发芽环境 Germination environment | 发芽天数 Germination days (d) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
CK | 75.33 | 80.00 | 81.33 | 82.67 | 82.67 | 82.67 | 82.67 |
A1 | 25.33 | 36.00 | 43.33 | 47.33 | 50.67 | 52.67 | 52.67 |
A2 | 12.67 | 25.33 | 27.33 | 32.00 | 36.67 | 38.67 | 39.33 |
A3 | 3.33 | 3.33 | 5.33 | 11.33 | 17.33 | 20.00 | 22.00 |
B1 | 5.33 | 22.67 | 28.67 | 38.00 | 47.33 | 50.00 | 50.67 |
B2 | 2.00 | 6.00 | 8.00 | 9.33 | 12.00 | 14.00 | 16.00 |
B3 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
C1 | 10.00 | 20.00 | 40.00 | 46.00 | 51.33 | 52.00 | 54.67 |
C2 | 3.33 | 19.33 | 24.67 | 30.67 | 36.00 | 36.00 | 36.00 |
C3 | 5.33 | 10.00 | 19.33 | 25.33 | 29.33 | 34.67 | 34.67 |
发芽环境 Germination environment | 发芽天数 Germination days (d) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
CK | 22.67 | 26.67 | 28.00 | 28.67 | 28.67 | 28.67 | 28.67 |
A1 | 11.33 | 18.00 | 22.67 | 25.33 | 25.33 | 25.33 | 25.33 |
A2 | 8.67 | 15.33 | 18.00 | 18.67 | 19.33 | 21.33 | 21.33 |
A3 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 13.33 | 15.33 | 18.67 | 18.67 | 18.67 |
B1 | 5.33 | 6.00 | 7.33 | 13.33 | 18.00 | 19.33 | 21.33 |
B2 | 0.00 | 1.33 | 4.00 | 6.00 | 10.67 | 14.00 | 16.67 |
B3 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
C1 | 12.67 | 12.67 | 14.00 | 16.67 | 18.00 | 19.34 | 22.00 |
C2 | 6.66 | 12.67 | 12.67 | 14.67 | 14.67 | 15.34 | 15.34 |
C3 | 0.00 | 6.67 | 12.67 | 12.67 | 13.34 | 14.00 | 14.00 |
表2 不同发芽环境下引进种种子7 d的累积发芽率(%)
Table 2 Accumulating germination percentage (%) of Bromus stamineus seeds in 7 days
发芽环境 Germination environment | 发芽天数 Germination days (d) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
CK | 22.67 | 26.67 | 28.00 | 28.67 | 28.67 | 28.67 | 28.67 |
A1 | 11.33 | 18.00 | 22.67 | 25.33 | 25.33 | 25.33 | 25.33 |
A2 | 8.67 | 15.33 | 18.00 | 18.67 | 19.33 | 21.33 | 21.33 |
A3 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 13.33 | 15.33 | 18.67 | 18.67 | 18.67 |
B1 | 5.33 | 6.00 | 7.33 | 13.33 | 18.00 | 19.33 | 21.33 |
B2 | 0.00 | 1.33 | 4.00 | 6.00 | 10.67 | 14.00 | 16.67 |
B3 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
C1 | 12.67 | 12.67 | 14.00 | 16.67 | 18.00 | 19.34 | 22.00 |
C2 | 6.66 | 12.67 | 12.67 | 14.67 | 14.67 | 15.34 | 15.34 |
C3 | 0.00 | 6.67 | 12.67 | 12.67 | 13.34 | 14.00 | 14.00 |
图6 盐胁迫下发芽率下降百分比变化趋势图
Fig.6 Effect of salt stress on decrease rate of germination percentage (Gp) of two plants CK、A1、A2、A3、B1、B2、B3、C1、C2、C3:同表1 See Table 1
植物种 Species | CK | A1 | A2 | A3 | B1 | B2 | B3 | C1 | C2 | C3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
本地种 Bromus inermis cv. Xilinguole | 100.00 | 66.80 | 48.84 | 25.61 | 62.63 | 18.15 | 0.00 | 65.14 | 40.93 | 40.26 |
引进种 B. stamineus | 100.00 | 93.99 | 81.82 | 68.81 | 76.21 | 62.07 | 0.00 | 77.80 | 69.90 | 51.76 |
表3 两种无芒雀麦种子在盐胁迫下相对发芽率的变化
Table 3 The change of relative germination percentage (RGp) of two plants under salt stress
植物种 Species | CK | A1 | A2 | A3 | B1 | B2 | B3 | C1 | C2 | C3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
本地种 Bromus inermis cv. Xilinguole | 100.00 | 66.80 | 48.84 | 25.61 | 62.63 | 18.15 | 0.00 | 65.14 | 40.93 | 40.26 |
引进种 B. stamineus | 100.00 | 93.99 | 81.82 | 68.81 | 76.21 | 62.07 | 0.00 | 77.80 | 69.90 | 51.76 |
植物种 Species | 盐分 Salt | 回归方程 Linear regression | 调整后R2 Adjusted R square | 显著性水平 Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|
本地种 Bromus inermis cv. Xilinguole | Na2SO4 | Y=78.47-19.535X | 0.953 | 0.016 |
NaCl | Y=79.737-28.268X | 0.968 | 0.011 | |
MgCl2 | Y=76.403-16.267X | 0.819 | 0.062 | |
引进种 B. stamineus | Na2SO4 | Y=28.6-3.4X | 0.992 | 0.003 |
NaCl | Y=30.268-9.067X | 0.890 | 0.037 | |
MgCl2 | Y=27.603-5.067X | 0.907 | 0.032 |
表4 不同盐处理与两种无芒雀麦种子发芽率之间的回归方程
Table 4 Linear regression between germination percentage (Gp) of two plants and salt stress
植物种 Species | 盐分 Salt | 回归方程 Linear regression | 调整后R2 Adjusted R square | 显著性水平 Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|
本地种 Bromus inermis cv. Xilinguole | Na2SO4 | Y=78.47-19.535X | 0.953 | 0.016 |
NaCl | Y=79.737-28.268X | 0.968 | 0.011 | |
MgCl2 | Y=76.403-16.267X | 0.819 | 0.062 | |
引进种 B. stamineus | Na2SO4 | Y=28.6-3.4X | 0.992 | 0.003 |
NaCl | Y=30.268-9.067X | 0.890 | 0.037 | |
MgCl2 | Y=27.603-5.067X | 0.907 | 0.032 |
[1] | Flowers TJ (1999). Salinisation and horticultural production. Scientia Horticulturae, 78, 1-4. |
[2] | Gupta GN (1987). Salt tolerance in dome tree species at seedling stage. Indian Forest, 12, 101-112. |
[3] | Laude HM, Chaugule BA (1953). Effect of seedling development upon heat tolerance in brome grasses. Journal of Range Management, 6, 320-324. |
[4] | Li CZ (李存桢), Liu XJ (刘小京), Yang YM (杨艳敏), Liu CY (刘春雨) (2005). The effects of saline condition on the germination and seedling growth of Suaeda salsa. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin (中国农学通报), 21(5), 209-212. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[5] | Liang HM (梁慧敏), Xia Y (夏阳), Du F (杜峰), Zhang PJ (张普金) (2001). Effects of NaCl stress on physioligical index of two lawn grassed. Grassland of China (中国草地), 23(5), 27-30. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[6] | Liu ZQ (刘祖祺), Zhang SC (张石城) (1994). The Plant Fastness Physiology (植物抗性生理学). China Agriculture Press, Beijing, 222~223. (in Chinese) |
[7] | Mahmut·Kari (买合木提·卡热), Karim·Ali (克热木·伊力), Wupur·Barat (吾甫尔·巴拉提) (2005). Effects of salt stress on activity of SOD, POD, CAT in leaves of almond rootstocks. Acta Agricultural Boreuli-Occidentalis Sinica (西北农业学报), 14(6), 96-101. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[8] | Qin GQ (覃广泉), Chen P (陈平), Su DH (苏东海) (2005). Effects of salt stress on seed germination and seedling growth of 4 graminaceous pasture cultivars. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin (中国农学通报), 21(3), 205-206. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[9] | Song SQ (宋士清) (2000). Effect of different treatment on the germination properties of Yunnan black seed squash. Journal of Hebei Vocation Technical Teachers College (河北职业技术师范学院学报), 14(2), 17-20. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[10] | Stewart AV (1996). Potential value of some Bromus species of the section Ceratochloa. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 39, 611-618. |
[11] | Sun JH (孙建华), Wang YR (王彦荣), Yu L (余玲), Wei D (卫东) (1999). Effects of osmotic priming with polyethylene glycol on seed germination and vigour of some herbage species. Acta Prataculturae Sinica (草业学报), 8, 34-42. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[12] | Wang GY (王广印), Zhou XM (周秀梅), Zhang JW (张建伟), Shen J (沈军) (2004). The effect of seed soaking with different chemical medicines and phytohormones on germination of Beta vulgaris L. var. cicla L. seeds. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences (河南农业科学), 10, 65-66. (in Chinese) |
[13] | Wang QZ (王亻全珍), Han JG (韩建国), Zhou H (周禾), Zhong Y (仲勇), Liu FY (刘富渊) (2004). Correlation and path coefficient analysis between seed yield components and seed yield on Bromus inermis L. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources (植物遗传资源学报), 5, 324-327. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[14] | Wang ZS (王占升), Zhu H (朱汉), Nohumasa Ichizen (1995). Herbage salt-endurance and species introduction for saline-alkali soil. Grassland of China (中国草地), (2), 38-42. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[15] | Wang ZQ (王遵亲), Zhu SQ (祝寿泉), Yu RP (俞仁培), Li LL (黎立群), Shan GZ (单光宗), You WR (尤文瑞), Zeng XX (曾宪修), Zhang CW (张粹雯), Zhang LJ (张丽君), Song RH (宋荣华) (1993). China Saline Soil (中国盐渍土). Science Press. Beijing, 278-286. (in Chinese) |
[16] | Wheeler DM (1995). Relative aluminium tolerance of 10 species of Graminaea. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 18, 2305-2312. |
[17] | Xie CT (谢承陶) (1993). Pickled Soil Meliorating and Crop Fastness. China Agriculture Press, Beijing, 203. (in Chinese) |
[18] | Yan QC (颜启传) (2001). Seeds (种子学). China Agriculture Press, Beijing, 112-118. (in Chinese) |
[19] | Yan SG (阎顺国), Shen YY (沈禹颖) (1996). Effects of ecological factors on salt-tolerance of Puccinellia tenuiflora seeds during germination. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 20, 414-422. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[20] | Yuan SH (苑盛华), Yang CP (杨传平), Jiao XC (焦喜才), Wang CJ (王春娟), Liu Y (刘燕), Yang QB (杨琼必), Liu GF (刘桂丰) (1996). The germinative characters of various tree seeds in different salinity. Journal of Northeast Forestry University (东北林业大学学报), 24(6), 41-46. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[21] | Zhang DG (张德罡) (1998). Study on the cell damage of five Poa turfgrass varieties at seedling stage under the salt stress. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University (甘肃农业大学学报), 33(1), 38-41. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[22] | Zhang JF (张建锋), Li JY (李吉跃), Xing SJ (邢尚军), Song YM (宋玉民), Xi JB (郗金标) (2003). Experiment of seed germination under salinity stress. Journal of Northeast Forestry University (东北林业大学学报), 31(3), 79-80. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[23] | Zhao KF (赵可夫), Wang ST (王韶唐) (1990). Crop Fastness Physiology (作物抗性机理). China Agriculture Press, Beijing, 279. (in Chinese) |
[1] | 李文博 孙龙 娄虎 于澄 韩宇 胡同欣. 火干扰对兴安落叶松种子萌发的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(预发表): 0-0. |
[2] | 袁涵 钟爱文 刘送平 徐磊 彭焱松. 水毛花种子萌发特性的差异及休眠解除方法[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(5): 638-650. |
[3] | 张雪, 韩凤朋, 肖波, 沈思铭. 黄土高原生物结皮对地表粗糙度和灌草植物种子二次扩散的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(12): 1668-1683. |
[4] | 迪力夏旦木·塔什买买提, 刘会良. 荒漠一年生植物异时萌发研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(12): 1611-1628. |
[5] | 董全民, 赵新全, 刘玉祯, 冯斌, 俞旸, 杨晓霞, 张春平, 曹铨, 刘文亭. 放牧方式影响高寒草地矮生嵩草种子大小与数量的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 1018-1026. |
[6] | 张敏, 朱教君. 光温条件对不同种源红松种子萌发的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(6): 613-623. |
[7] | 钟雨辰, 王斌, 方中平, 徐小忠, 于明坚. 片段化景观中壳斗科植物种子捕食和扩散模式[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(2): 154-162. |
[8] | 李绍阳, 马红媛, 赵丹丹, 马梦谣, 亓雯雯. 火烧信号对种子萌发影响的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(11): 1177-1190. |
[9] | 白天道, 余春兰, 甘泽朝, 赖海荣, 杨隐超, 黄厚宸, 蒋维昕. 细叶云南松种实性状变异与地理气象因子的关联[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(12): 1224-1235. |
[10] | 艾沙江•阿不都沙拉木, 迪丽娜尔•阿布拉, 张凯, 买热也木古•吐尔逊, 卡迪尔•阿布都热西提, 李玲. 喀什霸王的结实和种子萌发特性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(5): 437-446. |
[11] | 范紫腾, 毋钰灵, 王新菊, 李太强, 高江云. 共生真菌对兰科植物种间杂交后代种子萌发的效应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(4): 374-382. |
[12] | 王祖幸, 何维明. 土埋深度影响物种水平的种子质量-种子出苗关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(10): 899-908. |
[13] | 吴小琪, 杨圣贺, 黄力, 李笑寒, 杨超, 钱深华, 杨永川. 常绿阔叶林林冠环境对栲幼苗建成的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(1): 55-64. |
[14] | 田大栓. 氮磷供应量及比例对灰绿藜种子性状的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(9): 963-970. |
[15] | 何庆海, 杨少宗, 李因刚, 沈鑫, 柳新红. 枫香树种群种子与果实表型性状变异分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(7): 752-763. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19