中国植物细根碳、氮、磷化学计量学的空间变化及其影响因子

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2015.0015

植物生态学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2): 159-166.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0015 cstr: 32100.14.cjpe.2015.0015

所属专题：生态化学计量

中国植物细根碳、氮、磷化学计量学的空间变化及其影响因子

马玉珠^1,², 钟全林^1,², 靳冰洁^1,², 卢宏典^1,², 郭炳桥^1,², 郑媛^1,², 李曼^1,², 程栋梁^1,^2,^*()

¹福建师范大学地理研究所, 福州 350007
²福建师范大学地理科学学院, 湿润亚热带山地生态国家重点实验室培育基地, 福州 350007

收稿日期:2014-09-16 接受日期:2014-12-17 出版日期:2015-02-01 发布日期:2015-03-10
作者简介:
# 共同第一作者
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(31170374、31170596和31370589)、福建省教育厅新世纪优秀人才支持计划(JA12055)和福建省杰出青年基金(2013J06009)

Spatial changes and influencing factors of fine root carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry of plants in China

MA Yu-Zhu^1,², ZHONG Quan-Lin^1,², JIN Bing-Jie^1,², LU Hong-Dian^1,², GUO Bing-Qiao^1,², ZHENG Yuan^1,², LI Man^1,², CHENG Dong-Liang^1,^2,^*()

¹Geography Institute of Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China
²State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Humid Subtropical Mountain Ecology, College of Geographical Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China

Received:2014-09-16 Accepted:2014-12-17 Online:2015-02-01 Published:2015-03-10
About author:
# Co-first authors

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了研究中国陆地植物细根碳(C)、氮(N)、磷(P)的空间变化模式, 揭示细根在“温度-植物生理假说”及“生长速率假说”等方面的规律, 该文收集已发表的有关中国陆地植物细根研究的文献, 从中提取细根C、N、P元素含量及其相关数据, 分析了细根C、N、P含量及其比例与经纬度之间的关系。结果表明: 细根N、P元素含量均随纬度增加而增加, P含量随经度增加而降低, N:P随经度增加而增加。细根N、P含量与年平均气温、年降水量均呈负相关关系, 与土壤养分呈正相关关系。在土壤养分、温度、降水量3个非生物因素中, 土壤养分对细根N、P含量的影响最大。该文中细根和粗根的C:P、N:P差异变化不完全支持“生长速率假说”。根系和叶片一样, N、P含量与纬度呈正相关关系, 支持“温度-植物生理假说”, 反映了植物对自然环境的适应策略。

关键词: 纬度, 经度, 土壤养分, 温度, 降水

Abstract: Aims

Fine roots and leaves are important below- and above-ground functional organs. It is widely recognized that leaf nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) stoichiometry displays significant latitudinal variations, and two competing theories (i.e. Temperature-Plant Physiological Hypothesis and Growth Rate Hypothesis) have been proposed to explain this phenomenon. Although considerable efforts have been made to test these theories, comparatively few data have been reported for the plants in China to examine the latitudinal and longitudinal variations in fine root carbon (C), N and P stoichiometry. Accordingly, we compiled an extensive data set of root C, N and P stoichiometry, our objective was to address three main issues: (1) whether the C, N and P stoichiometric latitudinal patterns for roots conform to those reported for leaves, (2) how exactly does root C, N and P stoichiometry changes as a function of longitude, and (3) whether the Temperature-Plant Physiological Hypothesis or Growth Rate Hypothesis can account for the latitudinal patterns observed for fine root stoichiometry.

Methods

We compiled data on fine root C, N and P contents, climate, and geographic location, and analyzed the correlations among these variables.

Important findings

The N and P contents were higher in fine roots as opposed to coarse roots. The N and P contents in fine roots increased with increasing latitude. P content in fine roots declined with increasing longitude, whereas the N:P of fine roots increased with increasing longitude. The N and P contents in fine roots were negatively correlated with mean annual temperature and mean annual precipitation, but positively correlated with soil nutrient. Among the three abiotic factors (i.e. soil N and P contents, temperature and precipitation), soil N and P levels had the greatest effect on the N and P contents in fine roots . The variations observed in fine and coarse root C:P and N:P were inconsistent with the Growth Rate Hypothesis, whereas the positive correlations between root N and P contents and latitude were the same as those observed for leaves, which support Temperature-Plant Physiological Hypothesis, reflecting an adaptive strategy to environmental conditions.

Key words: latitude, longitude, soil nutrient, temperature, precipitation

马玉珠, 钟全林, 靳冰洁, 卢宏典, 郭炳桥, 郑媛, 李曼, 程栋梁. 中国植物细根碳、氮、磷化学计量学的空间变化及其影响因子. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(2): 159-166. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0015

MA Yu-Zhu,ZHONG Quan-Lin,JIN Bing-Jie,LU Hong-Dian,GUO Bing-Qiao,ZHENG Yuan,LI Man,CHENG Dong-Liang. Spatial changes and influencing factors of fine root carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry of plants in China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2015, 39(2): 159-166. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0015

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2015.0015

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2015/V39/I2/159

图/表 5

参考文献 50

1	Ågren GI (2004). The C:N:P stoichiometry of autotrophs- theory and observations.Ecology Letters, 7, 185-191.
2	Beyer F, Hertel D, Leuschner C (2013). Fine root morphological and functional traits in Fagus sylvatica and Fraxinus excelsior saplings as dependent on species, root order and competition.Plant and Soil, 373, 143-156.
3	Bloom AJ, Chapin F III, Mooney HA (1985). Resource limitation in plants: An economic analogy.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 16, 363-392.
4	Burton AJ, Pregitzer KS, Hendrick RL (2000). Relationships between fine root dynamics and nitrogen availability in Michigan northern hardwood forests.Oecologia, 125, 389-399.
5	Chadwick OA, Derry LA, Vitousek PM, Huebert BJ, Hedin LO (1999). Changing sources of nutrients during four million years of ecosystem development.Nature, 397, 491-497.
6	Crews TE, Kitayama K, Fownes JH, Riley RH, Herbert DA, Mueller-Dombois D, Vitousek PM (1995). Changes in soil phosphorus fractions and ecosystem dynamics across a long chronosequence in Hawaii.Ecology, 76, 1407-1424.
7	Dipesh KC, Schuler JL (2013). Estimating fine-root production and mortality in the biomass plantations.Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 44, 2514-2523.
8	Eissenstat DM, Yanai RD (1997). The ecology of root lifespan.Advances in Ecological Research, 27, 1-60.
9	Elser JJ, Dobberfuhl DR, MacKay NA, Schampel JH (1996). Organism size, life history, and N:P stoichiometry: Towards a unified view of cellular and ecosystem processes.Bioscience, 46, 674-684.
10	Elser JJ, Sterner RW, Corokhova E, Fngan WF, Markow TA, Conter JB, Hanrrison JF, Hobbie SE, Odell GM, Weider LW (2000). Biological stoichiometry from genes to ecosystems.Ecology Letters, 3, 540-550.
11	Foulds W (1993). Nutrient concentrations of foliage and soil in South-western Australia.New Phytologist, 125, 529-546.
12	Geng Y, Wang L, Jin DM, Liu HY, He JS (2014). Alpine climate alters the relationships between leaf and root morphological traits but not chemical traits.Oecologia, 175, 445-455.
13	Gordon WS, Jackson RB (2000). Nutrient concentrations in fine roots.Ecology, 81, 275-280.
14	Guo LB, Halliday MJ, Gifford RM (2006). Fine root decomposition under grass and pine seedlings in controlled environmental conditions.Applied Soil Ecology, 33, 22-29.
15	Han WX, Fang JX, Reich PB, Ian Woodward F, Wang ZH (2011). Biogeography and variability of eleven mineral elements in plant leaves across gradients of climate, soil and plant functional type in China.Ecology Letters, 14, 788-796.
16	Hao YR, Peng SL (2009). Roots of different dominant tree species in zonal vegetation in southern subtropical China.Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 31(2), 25-30.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[郝艳茹, 彭少麟 (2009). 南亚热带地带性植被优势树种根系的研究, 北京林业大学学报, 31(2), 25-30.]
17	He JS, Wang L, Flynn DFB, Wang XP, Ma WH, Fang JY (2008). Leaf nitrogen: Phosphorus stoichiometry across Chinese grassland biomes.Oecologia, 155, 301-310.
18	Hedin LO, Vitousek PM, Matson PA (2003). Nutrient losses over four million years of tropical forest development.Ecology, 84, 2231-2255.
19	Hendrick RL, Pregitzer KS (1993). The dynamics of fine root length, biomass, and nitrogen content in two northern hardwood ecosystems.Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 23, 2507-2520.
20	Hendricks JJ, Aber JD, Nadelhoffer KJ, Hallett RD (2000). Nitrogen controls on fine root substrate quality in temperate forest ecosystems.Ecosystems, 3, 57-69.
21	Jackson RB, Mooney HA, Schulze ED (1997). A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94, 7362-7366.
22	Kerkhoff AJ, Enquist BJ, Elser JJ, Fagan WF (2005). Plant allometry, stoichiometry and the temperature-dependence of primary production.Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters, 14, 585-598.
23	Kitajima K, Anderson KE, Allen MF (2010). Effect of soil temperature and soil water content on fine root turnover rate in a California mixed conifer ecosystem.Journal of Geophysical Research, 115, G04032, doi: 10.1029/2009JG001210.
24	Kochsiek A, Tan S, Russo SE (2013). Fine root dynamics in relation to nutrients in oligotrophic Bornean rain forest soils.Plant Ecology, 214, 869-882.
25	Koerselman W, Meuleman AFM (1996). The vegetation N:P ratio: A new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation.Journal of Applied Ecology, 33, 1441-1450.
26	Korner C, Diemer M (1987). In situ photosynthetic responses to light, temperature and carbon dioxide in herbaceous plants from low and high altitude.Functional Ecology, 1, 179-194.
27	Lin CF, Yang YS, Guo JF, Chen GS, Xie JS (2011). Fine root decomposition of evergreen broadleaved and coniferous tree species in mid-subtropical China: Dynamics of dry mass, nutrient and organic fractions.Plant and Soil, 338, 311-327.
28	Liu XJ, Zhang Y, Han WX, Tang AH, Shen JL, Cui ZL, Vitousek P, Erisman JW, Goulding K, Christie P, Fangmeier A, Zhang FS (2013). Enhanced nitrogen deposition over China.Nature, 494, 459-462.
29	Lu HZ, Sha LQ (2009). A decomposition dynamics study of different-size roots between a tropical rainforest and a rubber plantation in Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, SW China. Journal of Yunnan University (Natural Science Edition), 31, 528-533.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[卢华正, 沙丽清 (2009). 西双版纳热带季节雨林与橡胶林不同径级根分解. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 31, 528-533.]
30	Makino W, Cotner JB (2004). Elemental stoichiometry of a heterotrophic bacterial community in a freshwater lake: Implications for growth- and resource-dependent variations.Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 34, 33-41.
31	Makita N, Hirano Y, Dannoura M, Kominami Y, Mizoguchi T, Ishii H, Kanazawa Y (2009). Fine root morphological traits determine variation in root respiration of Quercus serrata.Tree Physiology, 29, 579-585.
32	McCormack ML, Guo DL (2014). Impacts of environmental factors on fine root lifespan.Frontiers in Plant Science, 5, 205.
33	Montagnoli A, Terzaghi M, Iorio AD, Stefania G, Scippa S, Chiatante D (2012). Fine-root morphological and growth traits in a Turkey-oak stand in relation to seasonal changes in soil moisture in the Southern Apennines, Italy.Ecological Research, 27, 1015-1025.
34	Nadelhoffer KJ (2000). The potential effects of nitrogen deposition on fine-root production in forest ecosystems.New Phytologist, 147, 131-139.
35	Odum HT, Pinkerton RC (1955). Time’s speed regulator: The optimum efficiency for maximum power output in physical and biological systems.The American Naturalist, 43, 331-343.
36	Reich PB, Oleksyn J (2004). Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 11001-11006.
37	Ruess RW, Hendriek RL, Burton AJ, Pregitzer KS, Sveinbjornssön B, Allen MF, Maurer GE (2003). Coupling fine root dynamics with ecosystem carbon cycling in black spruce forests of interior Alaska.Ecological Monographs, 73, 643-662.
38	Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2002). Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA. 145-177.
39	Sun T, Mao ZJ, Han YY (2013). Slow decomposition of very fine roots and some factors controlling the process: A 4-year experiment in four temperate tree species.Plant and Soil, 372, 445-458.
40	Tjoelker MG, Reich PB, Oleksyn J (1999). Changes in leaf nitrogen and carbohydrates underlie temperature and CO2 acclimation of dark respiration in five boreal tree species.Plant, Cell & Environment, 22, 767-778.
41	Trumbore SE, Gaudinski JB (2003). The secret lives of roots.Science, 302, 1344-1345.
42	Uriankhai T, Liu MS, Huang Z, Chen B, Zhang MJ, Xu C (2009). Distribution pattern of root biomass and inter- specific relationship in Achnatherum splendens-sophora alopecuroides community in Northwest China.Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 33, 748-754.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[晨乐木格, 刘茂松, 黄峥, 陈斌, 张明娟, 徐驰 (2009). 我国西北地区芨芨草-苦豆子群落根系分布与种间关系. 植物生态学报, 33, 748-754.]
43	Vogt KA, Grier CC, Vogt DJ (1986). Production, turnover, and nutrient dynamics of above-and belowground detritus of world forests.Advances in Ecological Research, 15, 303-377.
44	Wang QC (2004). Fine roots responses of manchurian ash and Korean larch to soil nutrients heterogeneity. PhD dissertation, College of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin.(in Chinese)
	[王庆成 (2004). 水曲柳落叶松细根对土壤养分空间异质性的反应. 博士学位论文, 东北林业大学林学院, 哈尔滨.]
45	Weih M, Karlsson PS (2001). Growth response of mountain birch to air and soil temperature: Is increasing leaf-nitro- gen content an acclimation to lower air temperature?New Phytologist, 150, 147-155.
46	Wilcox CS, Ferguson JW, Fernandez GCJ, Nowak RS (2004). Fine root growth dynamics of four Mojave Desert shrubs as related to soil moisture and microsite.Journal of Arid Environments, 56, 129-148.
47	Woods HA, Makino W, Cotner JB, Hobbie SE, Harrison JF, Acharya K, Elser JJ (2003). Temperature and the chemical composition of poikilothermic organisms.Functional Ecology, 17, 237-245.
48	Yuan ZY, Chen HYH (2012). A global analysis of fine root production as affected by soil nitrogen and phosphorus.Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279, 3796-3802.
49	Yuan ZY, Chen HYH, Reich PB (2011). Global-scale latitudinal patterns of plant fine-root nitrogen and phosphorus.Nature Communications, 2, 344.
50	Zhang XQ, Wu KH (2001). Fine-root production and turnover for forest ecosystems.Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 37(3), 126-138.
	[张小全, 吴可红 (2001). 森林细根生产和周转研究. 林业科学, 37(3), 126-138.]

	因变量 Dependent variable	n	最小值 Min (%)	最大值 Max (%)	平均值 Mean (%)	标准差 Standard deviation
细根 Fine root	C	33	37.09	58.91	47.39	5.07
	N	146	0.24	2.97	0.92	0.43
	P	123	0.01	0.47	0.10	0.08
	N:P	123	1.63	63.87	14.27	9.88
	C:N	33	23.09	116.02	59.15	27.11
	C:P	17	166.08	1 118.00	522.10	289.86
粗根 Coarse root	C	59	34.80	54.49	45.65	4.42
	N	182	0.07	2.18	0.59	0.33
	P	149	0.01	0.54	0.06	0.05
	N:P	149	1.58	35.07	11.67	6.86
	C:N	55	24.27	560.00	121.98	95.50
	C:P	41	318.15	2 407.22	957.27	551.18

	因变量 Dependent variable	n	最小值 Min (%)	最大值 Max (%)	平均值 Mean (%)	标准差 Standard deviation
细根 Fine root	C	33	37.09	58.91	47.39	5.07
	N	146	0.24	2.97	0.92	0.43
	P	123	0.01	0.47	0.10	0.08
	N:P	123	1.63	63.87	14.27	9.88
	C:N	33	23.09	116.02	59.15	27.11
	C:P	17	166.08	1 118.00	522.10	289.86
粗根 Coarse root	C	59	34.80	54.49	45.65	4.42
	N	182	0.07	2.18	0.59	0.33
	P	149	0.01	0.54	0.06	0.05
	N:P	149	1.58	35.07	11.67	6.86
	C:N	55	24.27	560.00	121.98	95.50
	C:P	41	318.15	2 407.22	957.27	551.18

	因变量 Dependent variable	截距 Intercept	斜率 Slope	R²	p	n
细根 Fine root	C	1.74	-0.002	0.102	0.070	33
	N	-0.36	0.009	0.133	<0.001	146
	P	-1.54	0.013	0.097	<0.001	123
	N:P	1.21	-0.005	0.016	0.161	123
	C:N	2.20	-0.015	0.259	0.003	33
	C:P	2.95	-0.009	0.085	0.256	17
粗根 Coarse root	C	1.71	-0.002	0.099	0.015	59
	N	-0.21	-0.003	0.006	0.316	182
	P	-1.45	0.005	0.020	0.084	149
	N:P	1.37	-0.012	0.095	<0.001	149
	C:N	2.13	-0.004	0.015	0.373	55
	C:P	2.89	0.001	0.001	0.863	41
细根+粗根 Fine root + coarse root	C	1.71	-0.002	0.081	0.006	92
	N	-0.29	0.003	0.008	0.101	328
	P	-1.50	0.009	0.051	<0.001	272
	N:P	1.29	-0.008	0.047	<0.001	272
	C:N	2.26	-0.012	0.097	0.003	88
	C:P	3.04	-0.007	0.034	0.167	58

	因变量 Dependent variable	截距 Intercept	斜率 Slope	R²	p	n
细根 Fine root	C	1.74	-0.002	0.102	0.070	33
	N	-0.36	0.009	0.133	<0.001	146
	P	-1.54	0.013	0.097	<0.001	123
	N:P	1.21	-0.005	0.016	0.161	123
	C:N	2.20	-0.015	0.259	0.003	33
	C:P	2.95	-0.009	0.085	0.256	17
粗根 Coarse root	C	1.71	-0.002	0.099	0.015	59
	N	-0.21	-0.003	0.006	0.316	182
	P	-1.45	0.005	0.020	0.084	149
	N:P	1.37	-0.012	0.095	<0.001	149
	C:N	2.13	-0.004	0.015	0.373	55
	C:P	2.89	0.001	0.001	0.863	41
细根+粗根 Fine root + coarse root	C	1.71	-0.002	0.081	0.006	92
	N	-0.29	0.003	0.008	0.101	328
	P	-1.50	0.009	0.051	<0.001	272
	N:P	1.29	-0.008	0.047	<0.001	272
	C:N	2.26	-0.012	0.097	0.003	88
	C:P	3.04	-0.007	0.034	0.167	58

	因变量 Dependent variable	截距 Intercept	斜率 Slope	R²	p	n
细根 Fine root	C	1.76	-0.000 7	0.024	0.386	33
	N	-0.60	0.004 5	0.028	0.042	146
	P	0.35	-0.013 0	0.059	0.007	123
	N:P	-0.46	0.013 4	0.078	0.002	123
	C:N	2.44	-0.006 3	0.098	0.075	33
	C:P	2.15	0.004 7	0.037	0.462	17
粗根 Coarse root	C	1.81	-0.001 3	0.097	0.016	59
	N	-1.24	0.008 4	0.125	<0.001	182
	P	-1.27	-0.000 2	<0.001	0.932	149
	N:P	0.13	0.007 6	0.083	<0.001	149
	C:N	2.76	-0.006 9	0.060	0.071	55
	C:P	2.19	0.006 8	0.056	0.138	41
细根+粗根 Fine root + coarse root	C	1.78	-0.001 1	0.057	0.021	92
	N	-1.13	0.008 2	0.090	<0.001	328
	P	-0.94	-0.002 5	0.005	0.232	272
	N:P	-0.01	0.009 0	0.077	<0.001	272
	C:N	2.80	-0.008 2	0.084	0.006	88
	C:P	2.24	0.005 6	0.033	0.172	58

中国植物细根碳、氮、磷化学计量学的空间变化及其影响因子

Spatial changes and influencing factors of fine root carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry of plants in China

全文

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 50

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

	N			P
	斜率 Slope	R²	n	斜率 Slope	R²	n
年平均气温 MAT	-6.8E-3	0.105^***	146	-8.3E-3	0.056^**	123
年降水量 MAP	-8.4E-5	0.061^**	146	-1.6E-4	0.077^**	123
年平均气温+年降水量 MAT + MAP		0.109^***	146		0.077^**	123
土壤N Soil N	0.17	0.112^**	80
土壤P Soil P				0.36	0.154^**	65
气候+土壤N Climate + soil N		0.154^**	80
气候+土壤P Climate + soil P					0.250^**	65

	年平均气温 MAT	年降水量 MAP	土壤N Soil N	土壤P Soil P	n	R²	p
细根N Fine root N	-0.047	-0.106	0.283		80	0.154	0.005
细根P Fine root P	-0.336	0.228		0.419	65	0.250	0.001
细根N Fine root N	-0.226	0.062			146	0.109	<0.001
细根P Fine root P	-0.008	-0.147			123	0.077	0.008

[1]	秦斐斐, 唐朝辉, 司彤, 慈敦伟. 盐碱耐受型和敏感型花生生长发育及根际土壤特性对丛枝菌根真菌的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 742-759.
[2]	何堂庆, 王变变, 曹鑫鑫, 张康成, 汪晓东, 王浩, 白彤硕, 赵叶新, 张艺, 王益, 仇云鹏, 胡水金. 半干旱草地植物和丛枝菌根真菌群落对长期降水增加的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 674-684.
[3]	张竟文, 李晶, 王汝苗, 王贺年, 崔丽娟. 不同纬度滨海湿地植物根系与土壤生态化学计量特征及内稳性分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(2): 461-473.
[4]	张静, 陈洁, 李艳朋, 盘李军, 许涵, 李意德, 何海生. 南亚热带针阔混交人工林植物生物量比较及其影响因子分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(2): 400-416.
[5]	张法伟, 李红琴, 祝景彬, 樊博, 周华坤, 李英年, 梁乃申. 氮添加和降水改变对高寒草甸生态系统地上与地下碳储的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1399-1409.
[6]	郝杰, 刁华杰, 苏原, 武帅楷, 高阳阳, 梁雯君, 牛慧敏, 杨倩雯, 常婕, 王袼, 许雯丽, 马腾飞, 董宽虎, $\boxed{\hbox{王常慧}}$. 降水调控农牧交错带盐渍化草地净初级生产力对氮添加及刈割的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(5): 710-719.
[7]	韩菲, 王袼, 武帅楷, 林茂, 董宽虎, $\boxed{\hbox{王常慧}}$, 苏原. 极端降水对不同草原土壤总硝化及总氮矿化速率及其敏感性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(5): 697-709.
[8]	李欣怡, 张丽芳, 吴友贵, 郭静, 兰荣光, 吕洪飞, 于明坚. 不同海拔高度下百山祖冷杉幼苗的生长特征及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(4): 610-623.
[9]	葛小彩, 李锦隆, 孙俊, 武盼盼, 胡丹丹, 程栋梁, 钟全林. 武夷山亚高山草甸土壤呼吸组分特征及影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(3): 502-512.
[10]	赵梦扬, 庄淏然, 许德浩, 马国荣, 马永成, 冯克鹏. 干旱半干旱地区灌区玉米农田土壤植物大气连续体系统氢氧稳定同位素特征及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(2): 256-267.
[11]	徐源, 谭卓然, 殷缘, 化佳敏, 韩迎新, 蔺吉祥, 王傲, 王竞红. 入侵植物对土壤特性影响的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(11): 1767-1777.
[12]	童金莲, 张博纳, 汤璐瑶, 叶琳峰, 李姝雯, 谢江波, 李彦, 王忠媛. C₄植物狗尾草功能性状网络沿降水梯度带的区域分异规律[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(11): 1817-1832.
[13]	马录花, 孟宪超, 王贵强, 马子峰, 李以康, 李月梅, 周华坤, 张法伟, 林丽. 藓类结皮接种对三江源高寒草甸土壤性状和微生物的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(1): 173-188.
[14]	马煦晗, 黄菊莹, 余海龙, 韩翠, 李冰. 降水量变化及氮添加下荒漠草原土壤有机碳及其易分解组分研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(8): 1065-1077.
[15]	钱尼澎, 高浩鑫, 宋超杰, 董淳超, 刘琪璟. 长白山白桦径向生长季节动态及其对环境因子的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(8): 1001-1010.