植物生态学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 479-486.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0064
胡颂平1,2, 梅捍卫2, 邹桂花2, 刘鸿艳2, 刘国兰2, 蔡润1, 李明寿2, 罗利军2,*()
接受日期:
2005-08-19
发布日期:
2006-05-30
通讯作者:
罗利军
作者简介:
*E-mail: lijun@sagc.org.cn基金资助:
HU Song-Ping1,2, MEI Han-Wei2, ZOU Gui-Hua2, LIU Hong-Yan2, LIU Guo-Lan2, CAI Run1, LI Ming-Shou2, LUO Li-Jun2,*()
Accepted:
2005-08-19
Published:
2006-05-30
Contact:
LUO Li-Jun
摘要:
随着分子标记技术的发展,利用不同的遗传群体对叶绿素的分子遗传机理进行了一些探索,定位了一些控制叶绿素含量的数量性状基因座(Quantitative trait loci, QTL)。该研究着眼于当前干旱严重影响农业生产的形势,以水稻重组自交系‘珍汕97B’בIRAT109’ F9代群体195个株系为材料,在正常与水分胁迫环境下研究叶片叶绿素含量与光合速率的变化及相关性,定位不同水分条件下影响叶绿素含量的QTL,为阐明干旱环境下水稻叶绿素含量的分子遗传机理、分子标记辅助育种和节水抗旱稻培育提供理论基础和依据。研究表明叶绿素含量与光合速率在正常供水下呈极显著正相关(r=0.185 7**),但在干旱下则表现无关(r=0.076 6)。QTL定位共检测到13个影响叶绿素含量的主效QTL,分别位于第1、2、3、4、5、6、10染色体:其中在干旱处理下检测到6个,其联合贡献率为47.39%;在正常供水下检测到7个,联合贡献率达56.19%。检测到显著互作效应位点16对:其中干旱处理下有4对显著互作,联合贡献率为18.57%;正常供水下有12对显著互作,联合贡献率达38.49%。
胡颂平, 梅捍卫, 邹桂花, 刘鸿艳, 刘国兰, 蔡润, 李明寿, 罗利军. 正常与水分胁迫下水稻叶片叶绿素含量的QTL分析. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(3): 479-486. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0064
HU Song-Ping, MEI Han-Wei, ZOU Gui-Hua, LIU Hong-Yan, LIU Guo-Lan, CAI Run, LI Ming-Shou, LUO Li-Jun. ANALYSIS OF QUNATITATIVE TRAIT LOCI FOR CHLOROPHYLL CONTENT IN RICE LEAVES UNDER DROUGHT STRESS. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2006, 30(3): 479-486. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0064
处理 Treatments | ‘IRAT109’ | ‘珍汕97B’ ‘Zhenshan97B’ | 重组自交系 Recombinant inbred lines (RILs) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
均值 Mean±SD | 均值 Mean±SD | 范围 Range | 均值 Mean±SD | 峰度 Peak | 偏度 Skewness | F值 F value | |||||||||||||||||||||
N | 4.96±0.10 | 4.72±0.18 | 3.83~5.52 | 4.61±0.32 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.45 | ||||||||||||||||||||
S | 4.69±0.13 | 4.41±0.10 | 3.90~5.69 | 4.62±0.32 | 0.13 | 0.33 |
表1 亲本及群体的叶绿素含量表型值分布特征
Table 1 Phenotypic values of the chlorophyll content of parents and RIL population
处理 Treatments | ‘IRAT109’ | ‘珍汕97B’ ‘Zhenshan97B’ | 重组自交系 Recombinant inbred lines (RILs) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
均值 Mean±SD | 均值 Mean±SD | 范围 Range | 均值 Mean±SD | 峰度 Peak | 偏度 Skewness | F值 F value | |||||||||||||||||||||
N | 4.96±0.10 | 4.72±0.18 | 3.83~5.52 | 4.61±0.32 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.45 | ||||||||||||||||||||
S | 4.69±0.13 | 4.41±0.10 | 3.90~5.69 | 4.62±0.32 | 0.13 | 0.33 |
图1 重组自交系群体的叶绿素含量在不同水分处理下的频率分布 S-CC:干旱胁迫下的叶绿素含量 Chlorophyll content of rice leaves in drought stress N-CC:正常条件下的叶绿素含量 Chlorophyll content of rice leaves in normal condition S-Pn: 干旱胁迫下的光合速率 Photosynthesis of rice leaves in drought stress
Fig.1 Frequency distributions of chlorophyll content in RILs under different water treatments
性状 Traits | 正常条件下 光合速率 N-Pn | 干旱胁迫下 叶绿素含量 S-CC | 正常条件下 叶绿素含量 N-CC |
---|---|---|---|
S-Pn | 0.347 7** | 0.076 6 | 0.109 8 |
N-Pn | 0.285 2** | 0.185 7** | |
S-CC | 0.766 7** |
表2 水稻叶片叶绿素含量与净光合速率的相关分析
Table 2 The correlations between leaf chlorophyll content and net photosynthetic rate
性状 Traits | 正常条件下 光合速率 N-Pn | 干旱胁迫下 叶绿素含量 S-CC | 正常条件下 叶绿素含量 N-CC |
---|---|---|---|
S-Pn | 0.347 7** | 0.076 6 | 0.109 8 |
N-Pn | 0.285 2** | 0.185 7** | |
S-CC | 0.766 7** |
数量性状位点 QTLs | 处理 Treatments | 染色体 Chromosome | 标记区间 Marker intervals | LOD值 LOD values | 贡献率 PVE(%) | 加性效应 Additive | 概率 p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
qCC1 | S | 1 | RM443-RM297 | 4.56 | 6.46 | 0.083 2 | <0.000 1 |
qCC2a | S | 2 | RM438-RM424 | 2.69 | 4.81 | 0.071 8 | 0.000 4 |
qCC3a | S | 3 | RM132-RM22 | 5.02 | 8.26 | -0.094 1 | <0.000 1 |
qCC3b | S | 3 | RM520-RM571 | 5.43 | 9.35 | -0.100 1 | <0.000 1 |
qCC4a | S | 4 | RM349-RM127 | 2.13 | 3.98 | 0.065 3 | 0.001 7 |
qCC5 | S | 5 | RM153-RM507 | 5.94 | 14.53 | 0.124 8 | <0.000 1 |
qCC2b | N | 2 | RM424-RM561 | 2.31 | 3.54 | 0.052 7 | 0.001 1 |
qCC3c | N | 3 | RM22-RM231 | 7.92 | 13.95 | -0.104 6 | <0.000 1 |
qCC3d | N | 3 | RM426-RM203 | 5.65 | 10.51 | -0.090 8 | <0.000 1 |
qCC4b | N | 4 | RM255-RM349 | 2.85 | 5.31 | 0.064 5 | 0.000 3 |
qCC6a | N | 6 | RM549-RM539 | 4.00 | 6.39 | 0.070 8 | <0.000 1 |
qCC6b | N | 6 | RM3-RM162 | 4.51 | 9.26 | -0.085 2 | <0.000 1 |
qCC10 | N | 10 | RM271-RM269 | 3.02 | 7.23 | -0.075 3 | 0.000 2 |
表3 水稻‘珍汕97B’בIRAT109’群体中检测到的叶片叶绿素含量QTLs
Table 3 QTLs for leaf chlorophyll content detected in rice RI (‘Zhenshan 97B’בIRAT109’) population
数量性状位点 QTLs | 处理 Treatments | 染色体 Chromosome | 标记区间 Marker intervals | LOD值 LOD values | 贡献率 PVE(%) | 加性效应 Additive | 概率 p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
qCC1 | S | 1 | RM443-RM297 | 4.56 | 6.46 | 0.083 2 | <0.000 1 |
qCC2a | S | 2 | RM438-RM424 | 2.69 | 4.81 | 0.071 8 | 0.000 4 |
qCC3a | S | 3 | RM132-RM22 | 5.02 | 8.26 | -0.094 1 | <0.000 1 |
qCC3b | S | 3 | RM520-RM571 | 5.43 | 9.35 | -0.100 1 | <0.000 1 |
qCC4a | S | 4 | RM349-RM127 | 2.13 | 3.98 | 0.065 3 | 0.001 7 |
qCC5 | S | 5 | RM153-RM507 | 5.94 | 14.53 | 0.124 8 | <0.000 1 |
qCC2b | N | 2 | RM424-RM561 | 2.31 | 3.54 | 0.052 7 | 0.001 1 |
qCC3c | N | 3 | RM22-RM231 | 7.92 | 13.95 | -0.104 6 | <0.000 1 |
qCC3d | N | 3 | RM426-RM203 | 5.65 | 10.51 | -0.090 8 | <0.000 1 |
qCC4b | N | 4 | RM255-RM349 | 2.85 | 5.31 | 0.064 5 | 0.000 3 |
qCC6a | N | 6 | RM549-RM539 | 4.00 | 6.39 | 0.070 8 | <0.000 1 |
qCC6b | N | 6 | RM3-RM162 | 4.51 | 9.26 | -0.085 2 | <0.000 1 |
qCC10 | N | 10 | RM271-RM269 | 3.02 | 7.23 | -0.075 3 | 0.000 2 |
处理 Treatments | 区间 Interval (i) | 染色体 Chromosome | 区间 Interval (j) | 染色体 Chromosome | LOD值 LOD values | 贡献率 PVE(%) | 上位效应 AAij | 概率 p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S | RM476A-RM220 | 1 | RM134-RM420 | 7 | 3.64 | 5.04 | -0.089 8 | 0.000 1 |
S | RM492-RM145 | 2 | RM255-RM349 | 4 | 4.78 | 4.53 | -0.081 8 | 0.000 3 |
S | RM122-RM153 | 5 | RM337-RM407 | 8 | 9.13 | 4.11 | -0.090 5 | <0.000 1 |
S | RM585-RM111 | 6 | RM179-RM277 | 12 | 3.83 | 4.89 | 0.088 5 | 0.000 1 |
N | RM486-RM237 | 1 | RM349-RM127 | 4 | 5.32 | 2.77 | -0.060 2 | 0.000 5 |
N | RM297-RM302 | 1 | RM442-RM85 | 3 | 4.78 | 2.46 | 0.074 0 | <0.000 1 |
N | RM476B-RM315 | 1 | RM477-RM264 | 8 | 3.70 | 3.18 | 0.068 1 | 0.000 1 |
N | RM438-RM424 | 2 | RM13-RM548 | 5 | 2.45 | 2.31 | 0.056 7 | 0.001 3 |
N | RM525-RM318 | 2 | RM261-RM471 | 4 | 4.77 | 2.96 | -0.060 8 | 0.000 2 |
N | RM514-RM442 | 3 | RM507-RM13 | 5 | 2.30 | 4.26 | -0.055 1 | 0.002 4 |
N | RM442-RM85 | 3 | RM459-RM161 | 5 | 4.21 | 4.26 | 0.079 9 | <0.000 1 |
N | RM261-RM471 | 4 | RM536-RM287 | 11 | 4.44 | 3.29 | 0.081 2 | <0.000 1 |
N | RM471-RM119 | 4 | RM19-RM453 | 12 | 4.29 | 3.42 | -0.072 4 | <0.000 1 |
N | RM274-RM480 | 5 | RM245-RM205 | 9 | 5.37 | 1.87 | -0.056 0 | 0.000 3 |
N | RM455-RM351 | 7 | RM463-RM235 | 12 | 4.17 | 3.59 | 0.072 8 | 0.001 0 |
N | RM515-RM284 | 8 | RN287-RM209 | 11 | 5.37 | 4.12 | -0.090 2 | <0.000 1 |
表4 RILs群体叶片叶绿素含量的上位性效应分析
Table 4 Epistasis loci associated with leaf chlorophyll content detected in RILs population
处理 Treatments | 区间 Interval (i) | 染色体 Chromosome | 区间 Interval (j) | 染色体 Chromosome | LOD值 LOD values | 贡献率 PVE(%) | 上位效应 AAij | 概率 p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S | RM476A-RM220 | 1 | RM134-RM420 | 7 | 3.64 | 5.04 | -0.089 8 | 0.000 1 |
S | RM492-RM145 | 2 | RM255-RM349 | 4 | 4.78 | 4.53 | -0.081 8 | 0.000 3 |
S | RM122-RM153 | 5 | RM337-RM407 | 8 | 9.13 | 4.11 | -0.090 5 | <0.000 1 |
S | RM585-RM111 | 6 | RM179-RM277 | 12 | 3.83 | 4.89 | 0.088 5 | 0.000 1 |
N | RM486-RM237 | 1 | RM349-RM127 | 4 | 5.32 | 2.77 | -0.060 2 | 0.000 5 |
N | RM297-RM302 | 1 | RM442-RM85 | 3 | 4.78 | 2.46 | 0.074 0 | <0.000 1 |
N | RM476B-RM315 | 1 | RM477-RM264 | 8 | 3.70 | 3.18 | 0.068 1 | 0.000 1 |
N | RM438-RM424 | 2 | RM13-RM548 | 5 | 2.45 | 2.31 | 0.056 7 | 0.001 3 |
N | RM525-RM318 | 2 | RM261-RM471 | 4 | 4.77 | 2.96 | -0.060 8 | 0.000 2 |
N | RM514-RM442 | 3 | RM507-RM13 | 5 | 2.30 | 4.26 | -0.055 1 | 0.002 4 |
N | RM442-RM85 | 3 | RM459-RM161 | 5 | 4.21 | 4.26 | 0.079 9 | <0.000 1 |
N | RM261-RM471 | 4 | RM536-RM287 | 11 | 4.44 | 3.29 | 0.081 2 | <0.000 1 |
N | RM471-RM119 | 4 | RM19-RM453 | 12 | 4.29 | 3.42 | -0.072 4 | <0.000 1 |
N | RM274-RM480 | 5 | RM245-RM205 | 9 | 5.37 | 1.87 | -0.056 0 | 0.000 3 |
N | RM455-RM351 | 7 | RM463-RM235 | 12 | 4.17 | 3.59 | 0.072 8 | 0.001 0 |
N | RM515-RM284 | 8 | RN287-RM209 | 11 | 5.37 | 4.12 | -0.090 2 | <0.000 1 |
群体 Populations | 标记方法 Marker types | 主效QTL(个) Major QTLs | 所在染色体 Chromosome | 互作位点(对) Epistatic loci | 所在染色体 Chromosome | 文献 Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RI(‘珍汕97B’(‘Zhenshan 97B’)בIRAT109’)F9 | SSR | 13 | 1,2,3,4,5,6,10 | 16 | 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,11,12 | 本研究,2005 This study, 2005 |
RI(`Acc8558'×`H359')F10 | RFLP/AFLP | 6 | 1,4,11 | - | - | 汪斌等, Wang et al., |
BIL (‘日本晴’(‘Nipponbare’)/ ‘Kasalath’//‘日本晴’ (‘Nipponbare’))F9 | RFLP | 5 | 1,2,,3,10 | 2 | 2,6,12 | 杨权海等, Yang et al., |
F2(‘Palawan’/‘IR42’) | RFLP | 3 | 2,4,7 | 1 | 9,10 | 吴平和罗安程, Wu & Luo, |
表5 不同群体水稻叶片叶绿素含量QTL定位情况比较
Table 5 Comparison of CC's QTLs in different rice populations
群体 Populations | 标记方法 Marker types | 主效QTL(个) Major QTLs | 所在染色体 Chromosome | 互作位点(对) Epistatic loci | 所在染色体 Chromosome | 文献 Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RI(‘珍汕97B’(‘Zhenshan 97B’)בIRAT109’)F9 | SSR | 13 | 1,2,3,4,5,6,10 | 16 | 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,11,12 | 本研究,2005 This study, 2005 |
RI(`Acc8558'×`H359')F10 | RFLP/AFLP | 6 | 1,4,11 | - | - | 汪斌等, Wang et al., |
BIL (‘日本晴’(‘Nipponbare’)/ ‘Kasalath’//‘日本晴’ (‘Nipponbare’))F9 | RFLP | 5 | 1,2,,3,10 | 2 | 2,6,12 | 杨权海等, Yang et al., |
F2(‘Palawan’/‘IR42’) | RFLP | 3 | 2,4,7 | 1 | 9,10 | 吴平和罗安程, Wu & Luo, |
[1] |
Alberte RS, Thornber JP, Fiscus EL (1977). Water stress effects on the content and organization of chlorophyll in mesophyll and bundle sheath choroplaste of maize. Plant Physiology, 59,351-353.
DOI URL PMID |
[2] | Bogorad L, Vasil IK (1991). The Photosynthetic Apparatus. Academic Press Inc, California,302-321. |
[3] | Chen WF (陈温福), Xu ZJ (徐正进), Zhang LB (张龙步) (1995). Physiological Bases of Super High Yield Breeding in Rice (水稻超高产育种生理基础). Liaoning Science and Technology Publishing Company, Shenyang,87-156. (in Chinese) |
[4] |
Devos KM, Gale MD (1997). Comparative genetics in the grasses. Plant Molecular Biology, 35,3-15.
URL PMID |
[5] | Jiang MY (蒋明义), Yang WY (杨文英), Xu J (徐江), Chen QY (陈巧云) (1994). Active oxygen damage effect of chlorophyll degradation in rice seedlings under osmotic stress. Acta Botanica Sinica (植物学报), 36,289-295. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[6] | Liu HY (刘鸿艳), Zou GH (邹桂花), Liu GL (刘国兰), Hu SP (胡颂平), Li MS (李明寿), Yu XQ (余新桥), Mei HW (梅捍卫), Luo LJ (罗利军) (2005). Studies on the QTL locating of CT, LWP and SF in rice under water ladder and the correlation of them. Chinese Science Bulletin (科学通报), 50,130-139. |
[7] | Liu ZQ (刘贞琦), Liu ZY (刘振业), Ma DT (马达腾) (1984). Study on the relations between the chlorophyll content of rice and its photosynthetic rate. Acta Agronomica Sinica (作物学报), 10,55-61. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[8] | Liu YZ (刘彦卓), Huang NR (黄农荣), Huang QM (黄秋妹), Chen ZM (陈钊明), Liu B (刘斌), Liang ZY (梁祖扬), Qiu RH (邱润恒), Zhang X (张旭) (2000). Study on the photosynthetic rate of high-yielding rice varieties of late season and chlorophyll content. Guangdong Agricultural Science (广东农业科学), 1,2-4. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[9] | Mayak SK (1978). Effect of Photosynthetic Intensity and Quality to Photosynthetic Efficiency in Rice, High Photosynthetic Efficiency and High Production of Crop.. Chongqing Branch of Science and Technology Literature Publishing Company, Chongqing,146-148. |
[10] | Meng J (孟军), Chen WF (陈温福), Xu ZJ (徐正进), Li LX (李磊鑫), Zhou SQ (周淑清) (2001). Study on photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll content. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University (沈阳农业大学学报), 32,247-249. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[11] | Shigesaburo T (1972). Photosynthetic efficiency in rice and wheat. Rice Breeding.. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines,471-479. |
[12] | Tuinstra MR, Grote EM, Goldsbrough PB, Goldsbrough PB, Ejeta G (1997). Genetic analysis of post-flowering drought tolerance and components of grain development in Sorghum bicolor L. Moench . Molecular Breeding, 123,439-448. |
[13] | Wang B (汪斌), Lan T (兰涛), Wu WR (吴为人), Li WM (李维明) (2003). Mapping of QTLs controlling chlorophyll content in rice. Acta Genetica Sinica (遗传学报), 30,1127-1132. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[14] | Wang YR (王永锐) (1995). Physiological Breeding in Rice (水稻生理育种). Beijing Science and Technology Literature Publishing Company, Beijing, 23-44. (in Chinese) |
[15] | Wu P (吴平), Luo AC (罗安程) (1996). Investigation on genetic background of leaf chlorophyll content variation in rice under nitrogen stressed condition via molecular markers. Acta Genetica Sinica (遗传学报), 23,431-438. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[16] |
Xu W, Subudhi PK, Crasta OR, Rosenow DT, Mullet JE, Nguyen HT (2000). Molecular mapping of QTLs conferring stay-green in grain sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) . Genome, 43,461-469.
URL PMID |
[17] | Yang QH (杨权海), Lu W (陆巍), Hu ML (胡茂龙), Wang CM (王春明), Zhang RX (张荣铣), Wan JM, (万建民), Yano M(2003). QTL and epistatic interaction underlying leaf chlorophyll and H2O2 content variation in rice ( Oryza sativa L.) . Acta Gentica Sinica (遗传学报), 30,245-250. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 冯旭飞, 雷长英, 张玉洁, 向导, 杨明凤, 张旺锋, 张亚黎. 棉花花铃期叶片氮分配对光合氮利用效率的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(11): 1600-1610. |
[2] | 郑宁, 李素英, 王鑫厅, 吕世海, 赵鹏程, 臧琛, 许玉珑, 何静, 秦文昊, 高恒睿. 基于环境因子对叶绿素影响的典型草原植物生活型优势研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(8): 951-960. |
[3] | 林雍, 陈智, 杨萌, 陈世苹, 高艳红, 刘冉, 郝彦宾, 辛晓平, 周莉, 于贵瑞. 中国干旱半干旱区生态系统光合参数的时空变异及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(12): 1461-1472. |
[4] | 荀彦涵, 邸雪颖, 金光泽. 典型阔叶红松林主要树种叶性状的垂直变异及经济策略[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(7): 730-741. |
[5] | 宋慧清, 倪鸣源, 朱师丹. 乔木与木质藤本的水力与光合性状的差异: 以热带森林崖豆藤属和买麻藤属为例[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(3): 192-204. |
[6] | 朱启林, 向蕊, 汤利, 龙光强. 间作对氮调控玉米光合速率和光合氮利用效率的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(6): 672-680. |
[7] | 李志民, 王传宽, 罗丹丹. 兴安落叶松叶水力与光合性状的变异性和相关性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(11): 1140-1148. |
[8] | 赵文赛, 孙永林, 刘西平. 干旱-复水-再干旱处理对玉米光合能力和生长的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(6): 594-603. |
[9] | 司晓林, 王文银, 高小刚, 徐当会. 氮硅添加对高寒草甸垂穗披碱草叶片全氮含量及净光合速率的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(12): 1238-1244. |
[10] | 唐海萍, 薛海丽, 房飞. 叶片和群落尺度净光合速率关系的探讨[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(9): 924-931. |
[11] | 杨浩, 罗亚晨. 糙隐子草功能性状对氮添加和干旱的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(1): 32-42. |
[12] | 沙依然·外力,李秉柏,张佳华,杨沈斌. 水稻模拟模型在高温敏感性研究中的应用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(5): 515-528. |
[13] | 王荣荣, 夏江宝, 杨吉华, 赵艳云, 刘京涛, 孙景宽. 贝壳砂生境干旱胁迫下杠柳叶片光合光响应模型比较[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(2): 111-121. |
[14] | 邹媛媛, 刘琳, 刘洋, 赵亮, 邓启云, 吴俊, 庄文, 宋未. 不同水稻品种种子固有细菌群落的多样性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(8): 880-890. |
[15] | 王建林, 温学发, 赵风华, 房全孝, 杨新民. CO2浓度倍增对8种作物叶片光合作用、蒸腾作用和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(5): 438-446. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19