断根对冬小麦竞争能力与产量的影响

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2007.0034

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用简化的deWit替代系列法研究了盆栽冬小麦‘长武135’(Triticum aestivum cv. Changwu 135)在拔节初期断根对冬小麦根冠关系、竞争能力及其与产量性状的关系。无论干旱或湿润,单栽条件下断根降低了小麦的根冠比,在混栽条件下,断根小麦的相对穗重和相对地上部生物量均显著低于未断根小麦,说明断根降低了小麦的竞争能力。根冠比越大竞争能力越强,即作物的竞争能力与根冠比存在正相关关系。单栽湿润条件,断根降低了小麦的穗重和籽粒产量,而在中等干旱条件下,断根小麦穗重和籽粒产量高于未断根小麦。说明在水资源充分的条件下,较高的作物个体竞争能力则具有较高的生产能力,而在水资源有限的情况下,降低作物个体竞争能力反而提高了群体籽粒产量。

关键词: 断根, 竞争能力, 产量, 干旱, 冬小麦

Abstract:

Aims Decreasing root biomass might be an effective way to increase crop production under drought stress. A winter wheat with root excision was chosen to determine whether 1) root biomass or R/S (root/shoot ratio) is reduced by root excision, 2) competitive ability is reduced by root excision and its link with R/S and 3) competitive ability influences crop production.

Methods The effects of root excision on root-to-shoot relations, competition ability and yield characters of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum cv Changwu135) were investigated using a deWit replacement series in a pot study. Root excision was conducted from tillering to jointing. Two culture methods (mono and mixed) were compared. The effect of drought was estimated from two groups of plants, one group maintained at 75% soil FWC and a second at about 50%, after root excision. Soil water was controlled by weight daily. At grain maturity, plants for each pot were harvested, divided into shoot and root, dried and weighed.

Important findings The R/S was significantly reduced after root excision in monocultures irrespective of water condition. Furthermore, spike weight and aerial biomass of wheat after root excision were reduced in mixed cultures, indicating that the competitive ability of wheat was reduced after root excision. There was positive correlation between competitive ability and R/S in crop varieties, i.e., the crop with the higher R/S had higher competitive ability. In monocultures, spike weight and yield of wheat after root excision were reduced with a complete water supply. However, the spike weight and yield of wheat were higher after root excision than without excision under drought conditions. This study indicated that the crop with higher competitive ability has a higher production capability with a complete water supply and that the crop could obtain higher yield with the reduction in individual competitive ability under limited water.

Key words: root excision, competitive ability, yield, drought, winter wheat

王振宇, 吕金印, 李凤民, 徐炳成. 断根对冬小麦竞争能力与产量的影响. 植物生态学报, 2007, 31(2): 300-304. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0034

WANG Zhen-Yu, LÁ Jin-Yin, LI Feng-Min, XU Bing-Cheng. EFFECT OF ROOT EXCISION ON COMPETITIVE ABILITY AND YIELD OF WINTER WHEAT. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2007, 31(2): 300-304. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0034

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2007.0034

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2007/V31/I2/300

图/表 5

参考文献 17

[1]	Donald CM (1968). The breeding of crop ideotype. Euphytica, 17,385-403.
[2]	Donald CM (1981). Competitive plants, communal plants, and yield in wheat crops. In: Evans LT, Peacock WJ eds. Wheat Science—Today and Tomorrow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 223-247.
[3]	Donald CM, Hamblin J (1983). The convergent evolution of annual seed crops in agriculture. Advances in Agronomy, 36,97-143.
[4]	Evans LT (1993). Crop Evolution, Adaptation and Yield. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[5]	Guo AH(郭安红), Li FM(李凤民), Li ZX (李召祥), Pang BS (庞斌双), Shan L (山仑) (1999). Effect of topsoil drought and root signals on yield formation of spring wheat. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology(应用生态学报), 10,689-695. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	Hu YJ(胡延吉) (2003). Competitive ability of two winter wheat cultivars with different adaptability. Acta Agronomica Sinica(作物学报), 29,175-180. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	Hurd EA (1974). Phonology and drought tolerance in wheat. Agricultural Meteorology, 14,39-55.
[8]	Liu HS (刘洪升), Li FM (李凤民) (2003). The study of spring wheat root function efficiency under water stress conditions. Acta Botanica Boreal-Occidentalia Sinica (西北植物学报), 23,942-948. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	Meekins JF, McCarthy BC (1999). Competitive ability of Alliaria petiolata (garlic mustard, Brassicaceae), an invasive nonindigenous forest herb. International Journal of Plant Science, 160,743-752.
[10]	Passioura JB (1983). Roots and drought resistance. Agricultural Water Management, 7,265-280.
[11]	Wu ZS(吴兆苏) (1990). Wheat Breeding (小麦育种学). China Agriculture Press, Beijing, 206-272. (in Chinese)
[12]	Weiner J (2003). Ecology—the science of agriculture in the 21st century. Journal of Agricultural Science, 141,371-377.
[13]	Zhang DY, Sun GJ, Jiang XH (1999). Donald's ideotype and growth redundancy: a game theoretical analysis. Field Crops Research, 61,179-187.
[14]	Zhang DY, Wang G (1994). Evolutionarily stable reproductive strategies in sexual organisms: an integrated approach to life history evolution and sex allocation. American Naturalist, 144,65-75.
[15]	Zhang R(张荣), Zhang DY(张大勇) (2000). A comparative study on root redundancy in spring wheat varieties released in different years in semi-arid area. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica(植物生态学报), 24,298-303. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	Zhang R (张荣), Zhang DY (张大勇), Yuan BZ(原保忠), Lin K(林魁), Wei H(魏虹) (1999). A study on the relationship between competitive ability and productive performance of spring wheat in semi-arid regions of loess plateau. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 23,205-210. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	Zhao SL(赵松岭), Li FM(李凤民), Zhang DY(张大勇), Duan SS (段舜山) (1997). Crop production is a population process. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 17,100-104. (in Chinese with English abstract)

处理 Treatment	籽粒产量 Yield (g·m^-2)
处理 Treatment	W	D
A	464.5±4.6^b	421.9±5.7^a
B	575.0±7.6^a	390.7±10.1^b
Hc	223.5±4.6^d	203.9±5.8^d
Hn	284.4±7.5^c	307.0±2.4^c

处理 Treatment	籽粒产量 Yield (g·m^-2)
处理 Treatment	W	D
A	464.5±4.6^b	421.9±5.7^a
B	575.0±7.6^a	390.7±10.1^b
Hc	223.5±4.6^d	203.9±5.8^d
Hn	284.4±7.5^c	307.0±2.4^c

W		D		RYT
A	B	A	B	A	B
0.96^d	0.99^c	0.96^d	1.58^a	0.98^c	1.26^b

W		D		RYT
A	B	A	B	A	B
0.96^d	0.99^c	0.96^d	1.58^a	0.98^c	1.26^b

处理 Treatment		株高 Height (cm)	穗重 Spike weight (g·m^-2)	地上部生物量 Aerial biomass (g·m^-2)	根重 Root weight (g·m^-2)	根冠比 Root/shoot ratio (%)
W	A	79.1^b	634.9^c	1 223.0^d	156.1^e	12^d
	B	83.2^a	798.6^a	1 535.4^b	227.1^c	14^c
D	A	73.6^cd	606.4^d	1 107.6^f	181.1^d	17^b
	B	74.4^c	556.9^e	1 165.0^e	244.7^b	21^a
W	Hc	78.3^b	569.8^e	1 184.6^e	280.3^a	20^a
	Hn	78.7^b	787.0^a	1 434.4^c
D	Hc	71.2^e	552.4^e	1 098.8^f	221.6^c	18^b
	Hn	72.0^e	750.2^b	1 570.4^a