植物生态学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 256-267.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00026 cstr: 32100.14.SP.J.1258.2013.00026
陶先萍, 罗宏海, 杨海, 丁全盛, 张亚黎, 张旺锋*(
)
发布日期:2014-02-12
作者简介: E-mail: zhwf_agr@shzu.edu.cn基金资助:
TAO Xian-Ping, LUO Hong-Hai, YANG Hai, DING Quan-Sheng, ZHANG Ya-Li, ZHANG Wang-Feng*(
)
Published:2014-02-12
摘要:
在新疆的气候生态条件下, 选用北疆2个棉花(Gossypium hirsutum)主栽品种‘新陆早13号’和‘新陆早33号’为供试材料, 设置限根(RR)与对照(CK)处理, 每个处理设置4个水氮水平: 水氮亏缺(W0N0)、水分亏缺(W0N1)、氮素亏缺(W1N0)与水氮适量(W1N1), 组成再裂区试验方案。采用管栽方法, 通过人工改变根系垂直生长深度和水氮供应, 在棉花产量形成期测定根系及叶片抗氧化保护酶系活性、生物量累积及分配等, 探讨根域限制及水氮供应对棉花根系生长及叶片衰老的影响机理。结果表明: 根域限制条件下, 棉花根系生物量、根系与叶片超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、过氧化物酶(POD)与过氧化氢酶(CAT)活性、棉株总生物量、根冠比均低于对照, 而地上部生物量与籽棉产量显著高于对照。水氮供应能有效地调节根系及叶片的生长, 不同水氮处理间棉花根系与叶片抗氧化保护酶系活性、叶绿素含量、地上部生物量及籽棉产量均表现为W1N1 > W0N1 > W1N0 > W0N0, 根冠比与根系生物量的表现与之相反。根域限制与水氮供应表现出互作优势, 根域限制下适量水氮供应处理的地上部生物量与籽棉产量均明显高于其他处理, 根冠比较低。因此, 在棉花根系生长受限的条件下, 优化生育期间水氮供应, 可以增强根系及叶片的抗氧化保护酶系活性、增加光合产物向地上部的分配比例、增加产量, 是进一步挖掘膜下滴灌棉花增产潜力的有效途径。
陶先萍, 罗宏海, 杨海, 丁全盛, 张亚黎, 张旺锋. 根域限制下水氮供应对膜下滴灌棉花根系及叶片衰老特性的影响. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(3): 256-267. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00026
TAO Xian-Ping, LUO Hong-Hai, YANG Hai, DING Quan-Sheng, ZHANG Ya-Li, ZHANG Wang-Feng. Effects of water and nitrogen supply on parameters of root and leaf senescence in cotton plants grown under root restriction and with under-mulch drip irrigation. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2013, 37(3): 256-267. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00026
图2 水氮供应对根域限制棉花根系生物量的影响(平均值±标准偏差)。CK, 对照; RR, 限根; W0N0, 水氮亏缺; W0N1, 水分亏缺; W1N0, 氮素亏缺; W1N1, 水氮适量。不同小写字母表示各处理的差异显著(p < 0.05)。
Fig. 2 Effects of water and nitrogen application regimes on root biomass of cotton cultivated under root restriction (mean ± SD). CK, control; RR, root restriction; W0N0, water and nitrogen deficiency; W0N1, water deficiency; W1N0, nitrogen deficiency; W1N1, moderate supply of water and nitrogen. Different small letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) among different treatments.
图3 水氮供应对根域限制棉花根系丙二醛(MDA)含量的影响(平均值±标准偏差)。CK, 对照; RR, 限根; W0N0, 水氮亏缺; W0N1, 水分亏缺; W1N0, 氮素亏缺; W1N1, 水氮适量。不同小写字母表示各处理的差异显著(p < 0.05)。
Fig. 3 Effects of water and nitrogen application regimes on malondialdehyde (MDA) content in root of cotton cultivated under root restriction (mean ± SD). CK, control; RR, root restriction; W0N0, water and nitrogen deficiency; W0N1, water deficiency; W1N0, nitrogen deficiency; W1N1, moderate supply of water and nitrogen. Different small letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) among different treatments.
图4 水氮供应对根域限制棉花根系超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)活性的影响(平均值±标准偏差)。CK, 对照; RR, 限根; W0N0, 水氮亏缺; W0N1, 水分亏缺; W1N0, 氮素亏缺; W1N1, 水氮适量。不同小写字母表示各处理的差异显著(p < 0.05)。
Fig. 4 Effects of water and nitrogen application regimes on superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities in root of cotton cultivated under root restriction (mean ± SD). CK, control; RR, root restriction; W0N0, water and nitrogen deficiency; W0N1, water deficiency; W1N0, nitrogen deficiency; W1N1, moderate supply of water and nitrogen. Different small letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) among different treatments.
图5 水氮供应对根域限制棉花根系过氧化物酶(POD)活性的影响(平均值±标准偏差)。CK, 对照; RR, 限根; W0N0, 水氮亏缺; W0N1, 水分亏缺; W1N0, 氮素亏缺; W1N1, 水氮适量。不同小写字母表示各处理的差异显著(p < 0.05)。
Fig. 5 Effects of water and nitrogen application regimes on peroxidase (POD) activities in root of cotton cultivated under root restriction (mean ± SD). CK, control; RR, root restriction; W0N0, water and nitrogen deficiency; W0N1, water deficiency; W1N0, nitrogen deficiency; W1N1, moderate supply of water and nitrogen. Different small letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) among different treatments.
图6 水氮供应对根域限制棉花根系过氧化氢酶(CAT)活性的影响(平均值±标准偏差)。CK, 对照; RR, 限根; W0N0, 水氮亏缺; W0N1, 水分亏缺; W1N0, 氮素亏缺; W1N1, 水氮适量。不同小写字母表示各处理的差异显著(p < 0.05)。
Fig. 6 Effects of water and nitrogen application regimes on catalase (CAT) activities in root of cotton cultivated under root restriction (mean ± SD). CK, control; RR, root restriction; W0N0, water and nitrogen deficiency; W0N1, water deficiency; W1N0, nitrogen deficiency; W1N1, moderate supply of water and nitrogen. Different small letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) among different treatments.
图7 水氮供应对根域限制棉花叶片SPAD值的影响(平均值±标准偏差)。CK, 对照; BO, 吐絮期; F, 开花期; FBO, 盛絮期; FF, 盛花期; LFB, 盛铃后期; PFB, 盛铃前期; RR, 限根; W0N0, 水氮亏缺; W0N1, 水分亏缺; W1N0, 氮素亏缺; W1N1, 水氮适量。
Fig. 7 Effects of water and nitrogen application regimes on leaf SPAD value of cotton cultivated under root restriction (mean ± SD). CK, control; BO, boll opening stage; F, flowering stage; FBO, full boll opening stage; FF, full flowering stage; LFB, late full boll stage; PFB, prophase full boll stage; RR, root restriction; W0N0, water and nitrogen deficiency; W0N1, water deficiency; W1N0, nitrogen deficiency; W1N1, moderate supply of water and nitrogen.
图8 水氮供应对根域限制棉花叶片丙二醛含量的影响(平均值±标准偏差)。CK, 对照; BO, 吐絮期; F, 开花期; FBO, 盛絮期; FF, 盛花期; LFB, 盛铃后期; PFB, 盛铃前期; RR, 限根; W0N0, 水氮亏缺; W0N1, 水分亏缺; W1N0, 氮素亏缺; W1N1, 水氮适量。
Fig. 8 Effects of water and nitrogen application regimes on malondialdehyde (MDA) content in leaf of cotton cultivated under root restriction (mean ± SD). CK, control; BO, boll opening stage; F, flowering stage; FBO, full boll opening stage; FF, full flowering stage; LFB, late full boll stage; PFB, prophase full boll stage; RR, root restriction; W0N0, water and nitrogen deficiency; W0N1, water deficiency; W1N0, nitrogen deficiency; W1N1, moderate supply of water and nitrogen.
图9 水氮供应对根域限制棉花叶片超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)活性的影响(平均值±标准偏差)。CK, 对照; BO, 吐絮期; F, 开花期; FBO, 盛絮期; FF, 盛花期; LFB, 盛铃后期; PFB, 盛铃前期; RR, 限根; W0N0, 水氮亏缺; W0N1, 水分亏缺; W1N0, 氮素亏缺; W1N1, 水氮适量。
Fig. 9 Effects of water and nitrogen application regimes on superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities in leaf of cotton cultivated under root restriction (mean ± SD). CK, control; BO, boll opening stage; F, flowering stage; FBO, full boll opening stage; FF, full flowering stage; LFB, late full boll stage; PFB, prophase full boll stage; RR, root restriction; W0N0, water and nitrogen deficiency; W0N1, water deficiency; W1N0, nitrogen deficiency; W1N1, moderate supply of water and nitrogen.
图10 水氮供应对根域限制棉花叶片过氧化物酶(POD)活性的影响(平均值±标准偏差)。CK, 对照; BO, 吐絮期; F, 开花期; FBO, 盛絮期; FF, 盛花期; LFB, 盛铃后期; PFB, 盛铃前期; RR, 限根; W0N0, 水氮亏缺; W0N1, 水分亏缺; W1N0, 氮素亏缺; W1N1, 水氮适量。
Fig. 10 Effects of water and nitrogen application regimes on peroxidase (POD) activities in leaf of cotton cultivated under root restriction (mean ± SD). CK, control; BO, boll opening stage; F, flowering stage; FBO, full boll opening stage; FF, full flowering stage; LFB, late full boll stage; PFB, prophase full boll stage; RR, root restriction; W0N0, water and nitrogen deficiency; W0N1, water deficiency; W1N0, nitrogen deficiency; W1N1, moderate supply of water and nitrogen.
图11 水氮供应对根域限制棉花叶片过氧化氢酶(CAT)活性的影响(平均值±标准偏差)。CK, 对照; BO, 吐絮期; F, 开花期; FBO, 盛絮期; FF, 盛花期; LFB, 盛铃后期; PFB, 盛铃前期; RR, 限根; W0N0, 水氮亏缺; W0N1, 水分亏缺; W1N0, 氮素亏缺; W1N1, 水氮适量。
Fig. 11 Effects of water and nitrogen application regimes on catalase (CAT) activities in leaf of cotton cultivated under root restriction (mean ± SD). CK, control; BO, boll opening stage; F, flowering stage; FBO, full boll opening stage; FF, full flowering stage; LFB, late full boll stage; PFB, prophase full boll stage; RR, root restriction; W0N0, water and nitrogen deficiency; W0N1, water deficiency; W1N0, nitrogen deficiency; W1N1, moderate supply of water and nitrogen.
| 品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 地上部分生物量 Shoot biomass (g) | 总生物量 Total biomass (g) | 根冠比 Root/shoot | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield (g·m-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ‘新陆早13号’ ‘Xinluzao 13’ | RRW0N0 | 59.41 ± 5.34e | 91.44 ± 6.24e | 0.54 ± 0.02b | 192.5 ± 1.1g |
| RRW0N1 | 86.06 ± 7.86b | 104.77 ± 5.74c | 0.22 ± 0.01g | 354.1 ± 3.5c | |
| RRW1N0 | 69.38 ± 6.39d | 101.84 ± 4.47d | 0.47 ± 0.01d | 299.4 ± 2.2e | |
| RRW1N1 | 94.08 ± 8.04a | 113.96 ± 5.77b | 0.21 ± 0.00g | 453.9 ± 4.1a | |
| CKW0N0 | 57.29 ± 4.79f | 92.69 ± 6.85e | 0.62 ± 0.03a | 141.8 ± 1.3h | |
| CKW0N1 | 77.54 ± 6.47c | 105.66 ± 5.52c | 0.36 ± 0.01e | 330.0 ± 2.2d | |
| CKW1N0 | 68.38 ± 5.83d | 102.30 ± 5.70d | 0.50 ± 0.02c | 276.2 ± 1.1f | |
| CKW1N1 | 92.04 ± 9.03a | 115.71 ± 5.79a | 0.26 ± 0.01f | 411.8 ± 6.8b | |
| ‘新陆早33号’ ‘Xinluzao 33’ | RRW0N0 | 65.79 ± 5.96g | 100.36 ± 6.89e | 0.53 ± 0.02b | 205.5 ± 1.4g |
| RRW0N1 | 96.18 ± 8.16c | 107.02 ± 5.10c | 0.11 ± 0.01f | 448.9 ± 1.1c | |
| RRW1N0 | 84.06 ± 7.08d | 103.83 ± 5.15d | 0.24 ± 0.01e | 420.1 ± 6.4d | |
| RRW1N1 | 115.45 ± 9.14a | 120.19 ± 6.77b | 0.04 ± 0.00h | 881.8 ± 21.6a | |
| CKW0N0 | 60.30 ± 5.63h | 101.67 ± 6.81e | 0.69 ± 0.03a | 196.5 ± 1.8g | |
| CKW0N1 | 79.72 ± 7.02e | 108.06 ± 5.24c | 0.36 ± 0.02d | 402.4 ± 2.4e | |
| CKW1N0 | 73.38 ± 6.83f | 103.98 ± 5.94d | 0.42 ± 0.02c | 325.0 ± 7.8f | |
| CKW1N1 | 113.77 ± 8.77b | 122.07 ± 6.60a | 0.07 ± 0.00g | 642.7 ± 13.5b |
表1 水氮供应对根域限制棉花生物量累积与分配的影响(平均值±标准偏差)
Table 1 Effects of water and nitrogen application regimes on accumulation and distribution of biomass of cotton cultivated under root restriction (mean ± SD)
| 品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 地上部分生物量 Shoot biomass (g) | 总生物量 Total biomass (g) | 根冠比 Root/shoot | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield (g·m-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ‘新陆早13号’ ‘Xinluzao 13’ | RRW0N0 | 59.41 ± 5.34e | 91.44 ± 6.24e | 0.54 ± 0.02b | 192.5 ± 1.1g |
| RRW0N1 | 86.06 ± 7.86b | 104.77 ± 5.74c | 0.22 ± 0.01g | 354.1 ± 3.5c | |
| RRW1N0 | 69.38 ± 6.39d | 101.84 ± 4.47d | 0.47 ± 0.01d | 299.4 ± 2.2e | |
| RRW1N1 | 94.08 ± 8.04a | 113.96 ± 5.77b | 0.21 ± 0.00g | 453.9 ± 4.1a | |
| CKW0N0 | 57.29 ± 4.79f | 92.69 ± 6.85e | 0.62 ± 0.03a | 141.8 ± 1.3h | |
| CKW0N1 | 77.54 ± 6.47c | 105.66 ± 5.52c | 0.36 ± 0.01e | 330.0 ± 2.2d | |
| CKW1N0 | 68.38 ± 5.83d | 102.30 ± 5.70d | 0.50 ± 0.02c | 276.2 ± 1.1f | |
| CKW1N1 | 92.04 ± 9.03a | 115.71 ± 5.79a | 0.26 ± 0.01f | 411.8 ± 6.8b | |
| ‘新陆早33号’ ‘Xinluzao 33’ | RRW0N0 | 65.79 ± 5.96g | 100.36 ± 6.89e | 0.53 ± 0.02b | 205.5 ± 1.4g |
| RRW0N1 | 96.18 ± 8.16c | 107.02 ± 5.10c | 0.11 ± 0.01f | 448.9 ± 1.1c | |
| RRW1N0 | 84.06 ± 7.08d | 103.83 ± 5.15d | 0.24 ± 0.01e | 420.1 ± 6.4d | |
| RRW1N1 | 115.45 ± 9.14a | 120.19 ± 6.77b | 0.04 ± 0.00h | 881.8 ± 21.6a | |
| CKW0N0 | 60.30 ± 5.63h | 101.67 ± 6.81e | 0.69 ± 0.03a | 196.5 ± 1.8g | |
| CKW0N1 | 79.72 ± 7.02e | 108.06 ± 5.24c | 0.36 ± 0.02d | 402.4 ± 2.4e | |
| CKW1N0 | 73.38 ± 6.83f | 103.98 ± 5.94d | 0.42 ± 0.02c | 325.0 ± 7.8f | |
| CKW1N1 | 113.77 ± 8.77b | 122.07 ± 6.60a | 0.07 ± 0.00g | 642.7 ± 13.5b |
| [1] | Bange MP, Milroy SP (2004). Growth and dry matter partitioning of diverse cotton genotypes. Field Crops Research, 87, 73-87. |
| [2] | Cai KZ, Luo SM, Duan SS (2003). The response of the rice root system to nitrogen conditions under-root confinement. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 23, 1109-1116. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 蔡昆争, 骆世明, 段舜山 (2003). 水稻根系在根袋处理条件下对氮养分的反应. 生态学报, 23, 1109-1116.] | |
| [3] | Casper BB, Jackson RB (1997). Plant competition underground. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 28, 545-570. |
| [4] | Dodd IC (2005). Root-to-shoot signalling: assessing the roles of ‘up’ in the up and down world of long-distance signalling in planta. Plant and Soil, 274, 251-270. |
| [5] |
Dong HZ, Niu YH, Li WJ, Zhang DM (2008). Effects of cotton rootstock on endogenous cytokinins and abscisic acid in xylem sap and leaves in relation to leaf senescence. Journal of Experimental Botany, 59, 1295-1304.
DOI URL PMID |
| [6] | Ferree DC, Myers SC, Schupp JR (1992). Root pruning and root restriction of fruit trees-current review. Acta Horticulturae, 322, 153-166. |
| [7] | Guo WQ, Zhao XH, Chen BL, Liu RX, Zhou ZG (2009). Effects of nitrogen on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) root growth under short-term waterlogging during flowering and boll-forming stage. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 35, 1078-1085. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 郭文琦, 赵新华, 陈兵林, 刘瑞显, 周治国 (2009). 氮素对花铃期短期渍水棉花根系生长的影响. 作物学报, 35, 1078-1085.] | |
| [8] | Hu ZZ (2007). Implementing actively the base construction of commodity cotton of high quality in Xinjiang production and construction group. Xinjiang Farmland Science & Technology, (6), 3-8. (in Chinese) |
| [ 胡兆璋 (2007). 积极促进兵团优质商品棉基地建设. 新疆农垦科技, (6), 3-8.] | |
| [9] | Kimura K, Kikuchi S, Yamasaki SI (1999). Accurate root length measurement by image analysis. Plant and Soil, 216, 117-127. |
| [10] | Li H, Zhang DY (1999). Morphological characteristics and growth redundancy of spring wheat root system in semi-arid regions. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 10, 26-30. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 李话, 张大勇 (1999). 半干旱地区春小麦根系形态特征与生长冗余的初步研究. 应用生态学报, 10, 26-30.] | |
| [11] | Li HS (2000). Principle and Technology of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry Experiment. Higher Education Press, Beijing. 169-172. (in Chinese) |
| [ 李合生 (2000). 植物生理生化实验原理和技术. 高等教育出版社, 北京. 169-172.] | |
| [12] | Li SK, Wang CT, Wang CY, Zhang WF (2000). A study on the distributing pattern and construction of high-yield cotton root system in north Xinjiang. Cotton Science, 12, 67-72. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 李少昆, 王崇桃, 汪朝阳, 张旺锋 (2000). 北疆高产棉花根系构型与动态建成的研究. 棉花学报, 12, 67-72.] | |
| [13] | Liu DY, Shi LY, Huang BR, Dong QY (1993). Research of cultivation methods on root system root vigor and plant characteristics in winter wheat. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 26, 51-56. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 刘殿英, 石立岩, 黄炳茹, 董庆裕 (1993). 栽培措施对冬小麦根系及其活力和植株性状的影响. 中国农业科学, 26, 51-56.] | |
| [14] | Liu JJ, Chen YH, Li MS (2002). Relationship between soil moisture and cotton transpiration under mulchtrickle irrigation. Cotton Science, 14, 200-203. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 刘建军, 陈燕华, 李明思 (2002). 膜下滴灌棉花植株耗水率与土壤水分的关系. 棉花学报, 14, 200-203.] | |
| [15] | Liu RX, Chen BL, Wang YH, Guo WQ, Zhou ZG (2009). Effects of nitrogen on cotton root growth under drought stress and after watering during flowering and boll-forming stages. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 33, 405-413. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 刘瑞显, 陈兵林, 王友华, 郭文琦, 周治国 (2009). 氮素对花铃期干旱再复水后棉花根系生长的影. 植物生态学报, 33, 405-413.] | |
| [16] | Liu RX, Guo WQ, Chen BL, Zhou ZG (2008). Effects of nitrogen on the antioxidant enzyme activities and endogenous hormone contents of cotton leaf under drought stress and after soil re-watering during the flowering and boll-forming stage. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 34, 1598-1607. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 刘瑞显, 郭文琦, 陈兵林, 周治国 (2008). 氮素对花铃期干旱及复水后棉花叶片保护酶活性和内源激素含量的影响. 作物学报, 34, 1598-1607.] | |
| [17] |
Liu RX, Zhou ZG, Guo WQ, Chen BL, Oosterhuis DM (2008). Effects of N fertilization on root development and activity of water-stressed cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants. Agricultural Water Management, 95, 1261-1270.
DOI URL |
| [18] | Pan QM, Yu ZW, Wang YF, Wang RY (1999). Changes of two senescence index and iPAs and ABA contents in wheat root at different soil layer after anthesis. Plant Physiology Communication, 35, 449-451. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 潘庆民, 于振文, 王月福, 王瑞英 (1999). 小麦开花后不同土层根系的两种衰老指标与iPAs及ABA含量的变化. 植物生理学通讯, 35, 449-451.] | |
| [19] | Schurr U (1998). Xylem sap sampling-new approaches to an old topic. Trends in Plant Science, 3, 293-298. |
| [20] | Song HX, Li SX (2003). Effects of root growing space of on maize its absorbing characteristics. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 36, 899-904. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 宋海星, 李生秀 (2003). 玉米生长空间对根系吸收特性的影响. 中国农业科学, 36, 899-904.] | |
| [21] | Thomas RB, Strain BR (1991). Root restriction as a factor in photosynthetic acclimation of cotton seedlings grown in elevated carbon dioxide. Plant Physiology, 96, 627-634. |
| [22] | Wang Z (2000). Plant Physiology. China Agriculture Press, Beijing. 422-423. (in Chinese) |
| [ 王忠 (2000). 植物生理学, 中国农业出版社, 北京. 422-423.] | |
| [23] | Wei CZ, Ma FY, Lei YW, Li JH, Ye J, Zhang FS (2002). Study on cotton root development and spatial distribution under film mulch and drip irrigation. Cotton Science, 14, 209-214. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 危常州, 马富裕, 雷咏雯, 李俊华, 冶军, 张福锁 (2002). 棉花膜下滴灌根系发育规律的研究. 棉花学报, 14, 209-214.] | |
| [24] |
Wei DZ, Ning SJ, Lin WX (2004). Relationship between wheat root activity and leaf senescence. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 15, 1565-1569. (in Chinese with English abstract)
URL PMID |
|
[ 魏道智, 宁书菊, 林文雄 (2004). 小麦根系活力变化与叶片衰老的研究. 应用生态学报, 15, 1565-1569. ]
PMID |
|
| [25] | Xie ZL, Tian CY, Bian WG (2009). Effects of water and nitrogen on cotton root architecture under film drip irrigation. Cotton Science, 21, 508-514. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 谢志良, 田长彦, 卞卫国 (2009). 膜下滴灌水氮对棉花根系构型的影响. 棉花学报, 21, 508-514. ] | |
| [26] | Xu M, Jia DT, Ma DR, Wang JY, Miao W, Chen WF (2010). Correlation of root physiology and leaf photosynthesis characteristics in northern Chinese japonica super rice. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 36, 1030-1036. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 许明, 贾德涛, 马殿荣, 王嘉宇, 苗微, 陈温福 (2010). 北方超级粳稻根系生理、叶片光合性能特点及其相互关系. 作物学报, 36, 1030-1036.] | |
| [27] | Yang HQ, Li LG, Jie YL (2001). Root restriction of horticultural plant and its application. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 28, 705-710. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 杨洪强, 李林光, 接玉玲 (2001). 园艺植物的根系限制及其应用. 园艺学报, 28, 705-710.] | |
| [28] |
Yang JC, Zhang JH, Wang Z, Zhu Q, Liu L (2002). Abscisic acid and cytokinins in the root exudates and leaves and their relationship to senescence and remobilization of carbon reserves in rice subjected to water stress during grain filling. Planta, 215, 645-652.
DOI URL PMID |
| [29] | Yong JWH, Stuart LD, Chin WS, Farquhar GD (2010). Effects of root restriction on growth and associated cytokinin levels in cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum). Functional Plant Biology, 37, 974-984. |
| [30] | Zhang DY, Jiang XH, Zhao SL (1995). Further thoughts on growth redundancy. Acta Pratacultural Science, (3), 17-22. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 张大勇, 姜新华, 赵松龄 (1995). 再论生长的冗余. 草业学报, (3), 17-22.] | |
| [31] | Zhang HZ, Gan XX, Hu XB, Li SL, Luo HH, Zhang WF (2010). Effects of irrigation and nitrogen application regimes on leaf senescence and yield and fiber quality of cotton in plastic mulched/drip irrigated systems. Journal of Shihezi University Natural Science, 28, 661-668. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [ 张宏芝, 干秀霞, 虎晓兵, 李善龙, 罗宏海, 张旺锋 (2010). 膜下滴灌水氮运筹方式对棉花叶片衰老及产量和品质的影响. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 28, 661-668.] | |
| [32] |
Zhang YQ, Miao GY (2006). Effects of soil root-growing space on root physiological characteristics and grain yield of sorghum. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 17, 635-639. (in Chinese with English abstract)
URL PMID |
|
[ 张永清, 苗果园 (2006). 根土空间对高粱根系生理特性及产量的影响. 应用生态学报, 17, 635-639.]
PMID |
| [1] | 张静, 陈洁, 李艳朋, 盘李军, 许涵, 李意德, 何海生. 南亚热带针阔混交人工林植物生物量比较及其影响因子分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(2): 400-416. |
| [2] | 徐恩相, 周蕾, 章晓炜, 张国萍, 仲杜伟, 黄智, 刘派, 迟永刚. 基于不同生育阶段冠层光谱和碳通量的水稻产量估算[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(1): 82-93. |
| [3] | 李淑英, 朱加保, 马艳, 徐道青, 阚画春, 陈敏, 刘小玲, 郑曙峰, 马小艳. 牛筋草对棉花的密度竞争和防治临界期[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(1): 134-149. |
| [4] | 张法伟, 李红琴, 祝景彬, 樊博, 周华坤, 李英年, 梁乃申. 氮添加和降水改变对高寒草甸生态系统地上与地下碳储的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1399-1409. |
| [5] | 邢强, 赵斌, 胡永红, 杨君, 秦俊, 刘何铭, 王红兵, 周鹏. 华东地区两种典型立体绿化植物根系性状特征及对新型土壤基质的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1498-1514. |
| [6] | 宋珊珊, 唐志尧. 河北塞罕坝草甸草原根际土壤真菌与植物地上生物量的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1461-1471. |
| [7] | 朱瑞德, 杨俊薇, 刘宵含, 陈冰瑞, 池秀莲, 田地, 杨光, 程蒙, 戴亚峰, 王诗文. 霍山石斛设施和林下栽培模式中养分对植物-微生物关联的调控[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1434-1447. |
| [8] | 樊月玲, 蒋正德, 叶佳舒, 郑立臣, 陈欣. 2005-2015年下辽河平原农田长期观测样地主要农作物收获期性状和产量数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(8): 1271-1282. |
| [9] | 马腾飞, 郝杰, 刁华杰, 宁亚楠, $\boxed{\hbox{王常慧}}$, 董宽虎. 晋北农牧交错带草地土壤无机氮含量的季节变化及其对放牧强度的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(6): 965-974. |
| [10] | 刘新月, 王立平, 刘春和, 孙艳丽, 刘鹏, 田赟, 贾昕, 查天山, 钱多. 北京不同林龄人工林生物量空间格局及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(6): 939-951. |
| [11] | 陈文义, 王智勇, 周梦岩, 麻文俊, 王军辉, 罗志斌, 周婧. 幼龄楸树生物量分配规律与异速生长模型[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(2): 356-366. |
| [12] | 郝毅晴, 刘伟, 杨阳, 安冰儿, 范冰, 李超, 崔久辉, 程延彬, 孙佳美, 潘庆民. 有机肥和无机肥对退化草原羊草种群密度和个体生物量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(1): 148-158. |
| [13] | 王袼, 胡姝娅, 李阳, 陈晓鹏, 李红玉, 董宽虎, 何念鹏, 王常慧. 不同类型草原土壤净氮矿化速率的温度敏感性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 523-533. |
| [14] | 梁逸娴, 王传宽, 臧妙涵, 上官虹玉, 刘逸潇, 全先奎. 落叶松径向生长和生物量分配对气候变暖的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 459-468. |
| [15] | 黄玲, 王榛, 马泽, 杨发林, 李岚, SEREKPAYEV Nurlan, NOGAYEV Adilbek, 侯扶江. 长期放牧和氮添加对黄土高原典型草原长芒草种群生长的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(3): 317-330. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2026 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19