植物生态学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (7): 811-822.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2021.0280 cstr: 32100.14.cjpe.2021.0280
谢欢1, 张秋芳2, 陈廷廷1, 曾泉鑫1, 周嘉聪1, 吴玥1, 林惠瑛1, 刘苑苑1, 尹云锋1, 陈岳民1,*(
)
收稿日期:2021-08-02
接受日期:2021-12-09
出版日期:2022-07-20
发布日期:2022-01-07
作者简介:* (ymchen@fjnu.edu.cn)基金资助:
XIE Huan1, ZHANG Qiu-Fang2, CHEN Ting-Ting1, ZENG Quan-Xin1, ZHOU Jia-Cong1, WU Yue1, LIN Hui-Ying1, LIU Yuan-Yuan1, YIN Yun-Feng1, CHEN Yue-Min1,*(
)
Received:2021-08-02
Accepted:2021-12-09
Online:2022-07-20
Published:2022-01-07
Supported by:摘要:
磷是亚热带地区植物生长的主要限制营养元素, 而氮沉降量的增加会降低土壤磷的有效性。该研究以微生物和植物细根为重点探究土壤磷转化, 揭示氮沉降背景下低磷有效性土壤的磷供应及生产力维持。通过在福州长安山模拟氮沉降实验, 设置对照(0 kg·hm-2·a-1)、低氮(40 kg·hm-2·a-1)和高氮(80 kg·hm-2·a-1) 3个处理, 收集杉木(Cunninghamia lanceolata)幼苗的土壤和根系样本, 综合分析土壤磷组分和养分含量、土壤微生物特征和植物根系特征。结果显示, 与对照处理相比, 低氮处理显著增加土壤易分解态有机磷、中等易分解态无机磷和闭蓄态磷含量, 但是显著降低原生矿物态磷和中等易分解态有机磷含量; 而高氮处理对土壤磷组分无显著影响。冗余分析表明, 土壤酸性磷酸酶活性、丛枝菌根真菌的相对丰度、土壤微生物生物量磷含量和根系生物量是解释土壤磷组分变化的重要微生物和植物因子。方差分解分析发现植物根系特征-土壤微生物特征共同解释了土壤磷组分变化的57%, 并且通过相关分析发现丛枝菌根真菌的相对丰度和根系生物量呈显著正相关关系。综上所述, 低水平的氮输入促进土壤丛枝菌根真菌的定殖, 丛枝菌根真菌和杉木根系通过协作促进中等易分解态有机磷和原生矿物态磷向易分解态磷的转换, 维持了杉木幼苗的生长。
谢欢, 张秋芳, 陈廷廷, 曾泉鑫, 周嘉聪, 吴玥, 林惠瑛, 刘苑苑, 尹云锋, 陈岳民. 氮添加促进丛枝菌根真菌和根系协作维持土壤磷有效性. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(7): 811-822. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2021.0280
XIE Huan, ZHANG Qiu-Fang, CHEN Ting-Ting, ZENG Quan-Xin, ZHOU Jia-Cong, WU Yue, LIN Hui-Ying, LIU Yuan-Yuan, YIN Yun-Feng, CHEN Yue-Min. Interaction of soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant roots acts on maintaining soil phosphorus availability under nitrogen addition. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2022, 46(7): 811-822. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2021.0280
图1 土壤磷(P)组分的提取流程和分类(图片内容参考自Hedley等(1982), Tiessen和Moir (2007))。
Fig. 1 Extraction procedure and classification of soil phosphorus (P) fractions (Picture content referenced from Hedley et al. (1982), Tiessen & Moir (2007)). Pi, inorganic phosphorus; Po, organic phosphorus.
| 处理 Treatment | pH | 总碳含量 Total carbon (C) content (g·kg-1) | 总氮含量 Total N content (g·kg-1) | 有效氮含量 Available N content (mg·kg-1) | 可溶性有机碳含量 Dissolved organic C content (mg·kg-1) | 可溶性有机氮含量 Dissolved organic N content (mg·kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 4.55 ± 0.06a | 16.30 ± 0.23a | 1.47 ± 0.03a | 7.97 ± 0.22b | 7.67 ± 0.60a | 4.61 ± 0.40b |
| LN | 4.51 ± 0.06a | 16.20 ± 0.04a | 1.48 ± 0.05a | 8.58 ± 0.49a | 6.78 ± 0.44b | 6.68 ± 0.36a |
| HN | 4.40 ± 0.09b | 16.61 ± 0.24a | 1.50 ± 0.02a | 8.83 ± 0.25a | 3.99 ± 0.71c | 7.24 ± 0.71a |
| p | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.57 | 0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
表1 施氮对福州长安山土壤理化性质的影响
Table 1 Effects of nitrogen (N) addition on soil physical and chemical properties at the Fuzhou Changʼan Mountain in Fujian Province
| 处理 Treatment | pH | 总碳含量 Total carbon (C) content (g·kg-1) | 总氮含量 Total N content (g·kg-1) | 有效氮含量 Available N content (mg·kg-1) | 可溶性有机碳含量 Dissolved organic C content (mg·kg-1) | 可溶性有机氮含量 Dissolved organic N content (mg·kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 4.55 ± 0.06a | 16.30 ± 0.23a | 1.47 ± 0.03a | 7.97 ± 0.22b | 7.67 ± 0.60a | 4.61 ± 0.40b |
| LN | 4.51 ± 0.06a | 16.20 ± 0.04a | 1.48 ± 0.05a | 8.58 ± 0.49a | 6.78 ± 0.44b | 6.68 ± 0.36a |
| HN | 4.40 ± 0.09b | 16.61 ± 0.24a | 1.50 ± 0.02a | 8.83 ± 0.25a | 3.99 ± 0.71c | 7.24 ± 0.71a |
| p | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.57 | 0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
图2 施氮(N)对福州长安山土壤磷(P)组分含量的影响(平均值±标准差)。不同小写字母表示处理间差异显著(p < 0.05)。CK, 对照; HN, 高氮; LN, 低氮。
Fig. 2 Effects of nitrogen (N) addition on soil phosphorus (P) components contents at the Fuzhou Changʼan Mountain in Fujian Province (mean ± SD). Different lowercase letters mean significant difference among different treatments (p < 0.05). CK, control; HN, high nitrogen; LN, low nitrogen. Pi, inorganic phosphorus; Po, organic phosphorus.
| 处理 Treatment | 子囊菌门 Ascomycota | 担子菌门 Basidiomycotaota | 被孢菌门 Mortierellomycota | 未定义 Unclassified | 罗兹菌门 Rozellomycota | 球囊菌门 Glomeromycota | 其他 Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 38.73 ± 9.28a | 26.04 ± 7.02a | 11.94 ± 3.16a | 11.18 ± 1.03a | 9.87 ± 6.22a | 0.27 ± 0.01b | 1.97 ± 0.56a |
| LN | 39.02 ± 6.00a | 26.16 ± 3.33a | 16.86 ± 3.52a | 10.83 ± 4.13a | 4.61 ± 0.97a | 1.09 ± 0.11a | 1.43 ± 0.48a |
| HN | 35.05 ± 12.21a | 37.24 ± 13.12a | 14.43 ± 2.39a | 8.11 ± 3.91a | 3.77 ± 1.27a | 0.62 ± 0.01a | 0.90 ± 0.63a |
| p | 0.809 | 0.175 | 0.129 | 0.400 | 0.091 | <0.001 | 0.072 |
表2 施氮(N)对福州长安山土壤真菌群落的影响(%)(平均值±标准差)
Table 2 Effects of nitrogen addition on soil fungi community (%) at the Fuzhou Changʼan Mountain in Fujian Province (mean ± SD)
| 处理 Treatment | 子囊菌门 Ascomycota | 担子菌门 Basidiomycotaota | 被孢菌门 Mortierellomycota | 未定义 Unclassified | 罗兹菌门 Rozellomycota | 球囊菌门 Glomeromycota | 其他 Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 38.73 ± 9.28a | 26.04 ± 7.02a | 11.94 ± 3.16a | 11.18 ± 1.03a | 9.87 ± 6.22a | 0.27 ± 0.01b | 1.97 ± 0.56a |
| LN | 39.02 ± 6.00a | 26.16 ± 3.33a | 16.86 ± 3.52a | 10.83 ± 4.13a | 4.61 ± 0.97a | 1.09 ± 0.11a | 1.43 ± 0.48a |
| HN | 35.05 ± 12.21a | 37.24 ± 13.12a | 14.43 ± 2.39a | 8.11 ± 3.91a | 3.77 ± 1.27a | 0.62 ± 0.01a | 0.90 ± 0.63a |
| p | 0.809 | 0.175 | 0.129 | 0.400 | 0.091 | <0.001 | 0.072 |
| 处理 Treatment | 酸性磷酸单酯酶 Acid phosphomonoesterase (nmol·g-1·h-1) | 酸性磷酸双酯酶 Acid phosphodiesterase (nmol·g-1·h-1) | 微生物生物量碳含量 Microbial biomass carbon content (mg·kg-1) | 微生物生物量氮含量 Microbial biomass N content (mg·kg-1) | 微生物生物量磷含量 Microbial biomass phosphorus content (mg·kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 24.68 ± 2.44b | 1.67 ± 0.08a | 215.42 ± 21.87c | 29.59 ± 1.40a | 41.07 ± 3.31a |
| LN | 48.89 ± 4.08a | 1.72 ± 0.05a | 273.59 ± 18.53b | 26.45 ± 0.98b | 21.75 ± 2.09b |
| HN | 19.59 ± 2.90c | 1.19 ± 0.03b | 358.27 ± 20.05a | 27.62 ± 0.95b | 20.78 ± 6.45b |
| p | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.003 | <0.001 |
表3 施氮对福州长安山土壤酶活性和微生物生物量养分含量的影响(平均值±标准差)
Table 3 Effects of nitrogen (N) addition on soil enzymes activity and microbial biomass nutrient content at the Fuzhou Changʼan Mountain in Fujian Province (mean ± SD)
| 处理 Treatment | 酸性磷酸单酯酶 Acid phosphomonoesterase (nmol·g-1·h-1) | 酸性磷酸双酯酶 Acid phosphodiesterase (nmol·g-1·h-1) | 微生物生物量碳含量 Microbial biomass carbon content (mg·kg-1) | 微生物生物量氮含量 Microbial biomass N content (mg·kg-1) | 微生物生物量磷含量 Microbial biomass phosphorus content (mg·kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 24.68 ± 2.44b | 1.67 ± 0.08a | 215.42 ± 21.87c | 29.59 ± 1.40a | 41.07 ± 3.31a |
| LN | 48.89 ± 4.08a | 1.72 ± 0.05a | 273.59 ± 18.53b | 26.45 ± 0.98b | 21.75 ± 2.09b |
| HN | 19.59 ± 2.90c | 1.19 ± 0.03b | 358.27 ± 20.05a | 27.62 ± 0.95b | 20.78 ± 6.45b |
| p | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.003 | <0.001 |
| 处理 Treatment | 根系生物量 Root biomass (g·plant-1) | 根系总碳含量 Root total carbon content (g·kg-1) | 根系总氮含量 Root total N content (g·kg-1) | 根系总磷含量 Root total phosphorous content (g·kg-1) | 侵染率 Root colonization rate (%) | 直径 root diameter (mm) | 比根长 Specific root length (m·g-1) | 比表面积 Specific root surface area (cm·g-1) | 组织密度 Root tissue density (g·cm-3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 2.79 ± 0.46b | 459.61 ± 4.62b | 9.61 ± 1.20a | 1.66 ± 0.23a | 58.23 ± 8.71c | 0.82 ± 0.13a | 36.13 ± 6.39a | 554.02 ± 25.53a | 0.20 ± 0.10a |
| LN | 4.01 ± 0.39a | 467.72 ± 8.98a | 10.01 ± 0.98a | 1.37 ± 0.19ab | 80.09 ± 4.13b | 0.69 ± 0.44a | 35.36 ± 9.58a | 265.01 ± 62.72b | 0.62 ± 0.37a |
| HN | 3.06 ± 0.49b | 470.08 ± 5.63a | 8.63 ± 1.18a | 1.31 ± 0.11b | 89.67 ± 4.69a | 0.39 ± 0.12a | 36.68 ± 12.59a | 342.53 ± 63.65b | 0.44 ± 0.21a |
| p | 0.003 | <0.001 | 0.180 | 0.023 | <0.001 | 0.079 | 0.978 | <0.001 | 0.062 |
表4 施氮对福州长安山植物根系特征的影响(平均值±标准差)
Table 4 Effects of nitrogen (N) addition on plant roots traits at the Fuzhou Changʼan Mountain in Fujian Province (mean ± SD)
| 处理 Treatment | 根系生物量 Root biomass (g·plant-1) | 根系总碳含量 Root total carbon content (g·kg-1) | 根系总氮含量 Root total N content (g·kg-1) | 根系总磷含量 Root total phosphorous content (g·kg-1) | 侵染率 Root colonization rate (%) | 直径 root diameter (mm) | 比根长 Specific root length (m·g-1) | 比表面积 Specific root surface area (cm·g-1) | 组织密度 Root tissue density (g·cm-3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 2.79 ± 0.46b | 459.61 ± 4.62b | 9.61 ± 1.20a | 1.66 ± 0.23a | 58.23 ± 8.71c | 0.82 ± 0.13a | 36.13 ± 6.39a | 554.02 ± 25.53a | 0.20 ± 0.10a |
| LN | 4.01 ± 0.39a | 467.72 ± 8.98a | 10.01 ± 0.98a | 1.37 ± 0.19ab | 80.09 ± 4.13b | 0.69 ± 0.44a | 35.36 ± 9.58a | 265.01 ± 62.72b | 0.62 ± 0.37a |
| HN | 3.06 ± 0.49b | 470.08 ± 5.63a | 8.63 ± 1.18a | 1.31 ± 0.11b | 89.67 ± 4.69a | 0.39 ± 0.12a | 36.68 ± 12.59a | 342.53 ± 63.65b | 0.44 ± 0.21a |
| p | 0.003 | <0.001 | 0.180 | 0.023 | <0.001 | 0.079 | 0.978 | <0.001 | 0.062 |
图4 土壤微生物特征(A)和植物根系特征(B)对福州长安山土壤磷(P)组分影响的冗余分析(RDA)。
Fig. 4 Redundancy analysis (RDA) of soil microbial (A) and plant roots characteristics (B) on soil phosphorus (P) components at the Fuzhou Changʼan Mountain in Fujian Province. AcP, acid phosphomonolase; AMF, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; FRD, fine root diameter; MBC, microbial biomass carbon; MBN, microbial biomass nitrogen; MBP, microbial biomass phosphorus; PD, acid phosphodiesterase; Pi, inorganic phosphorus; Po, organic phosphorus; RC, root colonization; RM, root biomass; RTC, root total carbon; RTD, special root density; RTN, root total nitrogen; RTP, root total phosphorous; SRA, special root area; SRL, special root length.
图5 方差分解分析显示由植物变量和微生物变量解释土壤磷组分变异百分比。
Fig. 5 Variation-partitioning analysis showing the percentages of the variance in soil phosphorus components explained by plant and microorganism variables.
| 根系生物量 Root biomass | 直径 Root diameter | 比根长 Specific root length | 比表面积 Specific root surface area | 组织密度 Root tissue density | 侵染率 Root colonization rate | 根系总碳含量 Root total carbon content | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 酸性磷酸单酯酶活性 Acid phosphomonoesterase activity | 0.713** | 0.264 | -0.009 | -0.287 | -0.434 | 0.064 | 0.267 |
| 酸性磷酸双酯酶活性 Acid phosphodiesterase activity | 0.306 | 0.541* | 0.001 | 0.400 | -0.585* | -0.590* | -0.417 |
| 丛枝菌根真菌相对丰度 Mycorrhizal Fungi relative abundance | 0.789** | 0.013 | 0.032 | -0.668** | -0.112 | 0.485 | 0.625* |
| 微生物生物量碳含量 Microbial biomass carbon content | 0.007 | -0.639* | -0.042 | -0.713** | 0.537* | 0.740** | 0.796** |
| 微生物生物量氮含量 Microbial biomass nitrogen content | -0.566* | 0.061 | -0.068 | 0.687** | 0.041 | -0.589* | -0.642** |
| 微生物生物量磷含量 Microbial biomass phosphorus content | -0.439 | 0.362 | 0.119 | 0.829** | -0.177 | 0.855** | -0.894** |
表5 福州长安山土壤微生物特征和植物根系特征的相关系数
Table 5 Correlation coefficients between soil microbial and plant roots characteristics at the Fuzhou Changʼan Mountain in Fujian Province
| 根系生物量 Root biomass | 直径 Root diameter | 比根长 Specific root length | 比表面积 Specific root surface area | 组织密度 Root tissue density | 侵染率 Root colonization rate | 根系总碳含量 Root total carbon content | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 酸性磷酸单酯酶活性 Acid phosphomonoesterase activity | 0.713** | 0.264 | -0.009 | -0.287 | -0.434 | 0.064 | 0.267 |
| 酸性磷酸双酯酶活性 Acid phosphodiesterase activity | 0.306 | 0.541* | 0.001 | 0.400 | -0.585* | -0.590* | -0.417 |
| 丛枝菌根真菌相对丰度 Mycorrhizal Fungi relative abundance | 0.789** | 0.013 | 0.032 | -0.668** | -0.112 | 0.485 | 0.625* |
| 微生物生物量碳含量 Microbial biomass carbon content | 0.007 | -0.639* | -0.042 | -0.713** | 0.537* | 0.740** | 0.796** |
| 微生物生物量氮含量 Microbial biomass nitrogen content | -0.566* | 0.061 | -0.068 | 0.687** | 0.041 | -0.589* | -0.642** |
| 微生物生物量磷含量 Microbial biomass phosphorus content | -0.439 | 0.362 | 0.119 | 0.829** | -0.177 | 0.855** | -0.894** |
图6 土壤磷(P)组分对施氮(N)的响应概念图。“ ”、“ ”、“ ”分别表示土壤微生物、植物根系指标含量显著增加、降低和无显著变化。“ ”和“ ”分别表示土壤各P组分显著增加和降低。Pi, 无机P; Po, 有机P。
Fig. 6 A conceptual diagram of the responses of soil phosphorus (P) components to nitrogen (N) addition and the regulation effect of soil microbes and plant root systems. “ ”、“ ”、“ ” represent that the contents of soil microbial and plant root index show significant increase, decrease, and no significant change, respectively. “ ” and “ ” represent that soil phosphorus components show significant increase and decrease, respectively. Pi, inorganic phosphorus; Po, organic phosphorus.
| [1] | Ackerman D, Millet DB, Chen X (2019). Global estimates of inorganic nitrogen deposition across four decades. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 33, 100-107. |
| [2] |
Aoki M, Fujii K, Kitayama K (2012). Environmental control of root exudation of low-molecular weight organic acids in tropical rainforests. Ecosystems, 15, 1194-1203.
DOI URL |
| [3] | Bing HJ, Wu YH, Zhou J, Sun HY, Luo J, Wang JP, Yu D (2016). Stoichiometric variation of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in soils and its implication for nutrient limitation in alpine ecosystem of eastern Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Soils & Sediments, 16, 405-416. |
| [4] |
Braun S, Thomas VFD, Quiring R, Flückiger W (2010). Does nitrogen deposition increase forest production? The role of phosphorus. Environmental Pollution, 158, 2043-2052.
DOI URL |
| [5] |
Brookes PC, Powlson DS, Jenkinson DS (1982). Measurement of microbial biomass phosphorus in soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 14, 319-329.
DOI URL |
| [6] |
Cao JL, Lin TC, Yang ZJ, Zheng Y, Xie L, Xiong DC, Yang YS (2020). Warming exerts a stronger effect than nitrogen addition on the soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community in a young subtropical Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation. Geoderma, 367, DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114273.
DOI |
| [7] |
Fan YX, Zhong XJ, Lin F, Liu CC, Yang LM, Wang MH, Chen GS, Chen YM, Yang YS (2019). Responses of soil phosphorus fractions after nitrogen addition in a subtropical forest ecosystem: insights from decreased Fe and Al oxides and increased plant roots. Geoderma, 337, 246-255.
DOI URL |
| [8] |
Fujii K, Aoki M, Kitayama K (2013). Reprint of “Biodegradation of low molecular weight organic acids in rhizosphere soils from a tropical montane rain forest”. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 56, 3-9.
DOI URL |
| [9] |
George TS, Turner BL, Gregory PJ, Cade-Menun BJ, Richardson AE (2006). Depletion of organic phosphorus from Oxisols in relation to phosphatase activities in the rhizosphere. European Journal of Soil Science, 57, 47-57.
DOI URL |
| [10] |
Goswami S, Fisk MC, Vadeboncoeur MA, Garrison-Johnston M, Yanai RD, Fahey TJ (2018). Phosphorus limitation of aboveground production in northern hardwood forests. Ecology, 99, 438-449.
DOI URL |
| [11] | Guo W, Geng ZZ, Chen Z, Li Q, Yang YX, Shen S, Jin DM, Wang CG (2018). Effects of nitrogen addition on mycorrhizal fungi community structure and diversity of Pinus koraiensis and Fraxinus mandshurica in Changbai Mountain. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 27, 10-17. |
| [郭伟, 耿珍珍, 陈朝, 李晴, 杨颜熙, 申思, 金大明, 王存国 (2018). 模拟氮沉降增加对长白山红松和水曲柳菌根真菌群落结构及多样性的影响. 生态环境学报, 27, 10-17.] | |
| [12] |
Hedley MJ, Stewart JWB, Chauhan BS (1982). Changes in inorganic and organic soil phosphorus fractions induced by cultivation practices and by laboratory incubations. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 46, 970-976.
DOI URL |
| [13] |
Helfenstein J, Tamburini F, von Sperber C, Massey MS, Pistocchi C, Chadwick OA, Vitousek PM, Kretzschmar R, Frossard E (2018). Combining spectroscopic and isotopic techniques gives a dynamic view of phosphorus cycling in soil. Nature Communications, 9, 3226. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05731-2.
DOI PMID |
| [14] |
Heuck C, Smolka G, Whalen ED, Frey S, Gundersen P, Moldan F, Fernandez IJ, Spohn M (2018). Effects of long-term nitrogen addition on phosphorus cycling in organic soil horizons of temperate forests. Biogeochemistry, 141, 167-181.
DOI URL |
| [15] |
Hou E, Chen C, Kuang Y, Zhang Y, Heenan M, Wen D (2016). A structural equation model analysis of phosphorus transformations in global unfertilized and uncultivated soils. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 30, 1300-1309.
DOI URL |
| [16] |
Huang WJ, Zhou GY, Liu JX, Duan HL, Liu XZ, Fang X, Zhang DQ (2014). Shifts in soil phosphorus fractions under elevated CO2and N addition in model forest ecosystems in subtropical China. Plant Ecology, 215, 1373-1384.
DOI URL |
| [17] | James M, Bernard M (1997). Reviews: working with mycorrhizas in forestry and agriculture. New Phytologist, 135, 788. |
| [18] | Jia LQ, Chen GS, Zhang LH, Chen TT, Jiang Q, Chen YH, Fan AL, Wang X (2019). Plastic responses of fine root morphological traits of Castanopsis fabri and Castanopsis carlesii to short-term nitrogen addition. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 30, 4003-4011. |
|
[贾林巧, 陈光水, 张礼宏, 陈廷廷, 姜琦, 陈宇辉, 范爱连, 王雪 (2019). 罗浮栲和米槠细根形态功能性状对短期氮添加的可塑性响应. 应用生态学报, 30, 4003-4011.]
DOI |
|
| [19] |
Kramer-Walter KR, Laughlin DC (2017). Root nutrient concentration and biomass allocation are more plastic than morphological traits in response to nutrient limitation. Plant and Soil, 416, 539-550.
DOI URL |
| [20] |
Lambers H, Raven JA, Shaver GR, Smith SE (2008). Plant nutrient-acquisition strategies change with soil age. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23, 95-103.
DOI URL |
| [21] |
Li L, McCormack ML, Chen FS, Wang HM, Ma ZQ, Guo DL (2019). Different responses of absorptive roots and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to fertilization provide diverse nutrient acquisition strategies in Chinese fir. Forest Ecology and Management, 433, 64-72.
DOI URL |
| [22] |
Lin GG, Gao MX, Zeng DH, Fang YT (2020). Aboveground conservation acts in synergy with belowground uptake to alleviate phosphorus deficiency caused by nitrogen addition in a larch plantation. Forest Ecology and Management, 473, 118309. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118309.
DOI URL |
| [23] |
Marklein AR, Houlton BZ (2012). Nitrogen inputs accelerate phosphorus cycling rates across a wide variety of terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytologist, 193, 696-704.
DOI PMID |
| [24] |
Oehl F, Oberson A, Probst M, Fliessbach A, Roth HR, Frossard E (2001). Kinetics of microbial phosphorus uptake in cultivated soils. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 34, 31-41.
DOI URL |
| [25] |
Ostonen I, Truu M, Helmisaari HS, Lukac M, Borken W, Vanguelova E, Godbold DL, Lõhmus K, Zang U, Tedersoo L, Preem JK, Rosenvald K, Aosaar J, Armolaitis K, Frey J, et al. (2017). Adaptive root foraging strategies along a boreal-temperate forest gradient. New Phytologist, 215, 977-991.
DOI PMID |
| [26] |
Peñuelas J, Poulter B, Sardans J, Ciais P, van der Velde M, Bopp L, Boucher O, Godderis Y, Hinsinger P, Llusia J, Nardin E, Vicca S, Obersteiner M, Janssens IA (2013). Human-induced nitrogen-phosphorus imbalances alter natural and managed ecosystems across the globe. Nature Communications, 4, 2934. DOI: 1038/ncomms3934.
DOI PMID |
| [27] |
Rennenberg H, Herschbach C (2013). Phosphorus nutrition of woody plants: many questions-few answers. Plant Biology, 15, 785-788.
DOI PMID |
| [28] |
Saiya-Cork KR, Sinsabaugh RL, Zak DR (2002). The effects of long term nitrogen deposition on extracellular enzyme activity in an Acer saccharum forest soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 34, 1309-1315.
DOI URL |
| [29] |
Shipley B, Meziane D (2002). The balanced-growth hypothesis and the allometry of leaf and root biomass allocation. Functional Ecology, 16, 326-331.
DOI URL |
| [30] | Smith SE, Read DJ (2008). Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. 3rd ed. Academic Press, Salt Lake City, USA. |
| [31] | Solaiman MZ, Ezawa T, Kojima T, Saito M (1999). Polyphosphates in intraradical and extraradical hyphae of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus, Gigaspora margarita. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 65, 5604-5606. |
| [32] |
Tian J, Wei K, Condron LM, Chen Z, Xu Z, Chen L (2016). Impact of land use and nutrient addition on phosphatase activities and their relationships with organic phosphorus turnover in semi-arid grassland soils. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 52, 675-683.
DOI URL |
| [33] | Tiessen H, Moir JO (2007). Characterization of available P by sequential extraction//Carter MR, Gregorich EG. Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. 2nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA. 293-306. |
| [34] |
Toljander JF, Lindahl BD, Paul LR, Elfstrand M, Finlay RD (2007). Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal mycelial exudates on soil bacterial growth and community structure. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 61, 295-304.
PMID |
| [35] |
Ushio M, Fujiki Y, Hidaka A, Kitayama K (2015). Linkage of root physiology and morphology as an adaptation to soil phosphorus impoverishment in tropical montane forests. Functional Ecology, 29, 1235-1245.
DOI URL |
| [36] |
Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987). An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 19, 703-707.
DOI URL |
| [37] |
Vitousek PM, Porder S, Houlton BZ, Chadwick OA (2010). Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen-phosphorus interactions. Ecological Applications, 20, 5-15.
DOI URL |
| [38] | Wardle DA, Walker LR, Bardgett RD (2005). Response to comment on “Ecosystem properties and forest decline in contrasting long-term chronosequences”. Science, 308, 633. |
| [39] |
Wright SJ, Turner BJ, Yavitt JB, Harms KE, Kaspari M, Tanner EVJ, Bujan J, Griffin EA, Mayor JR, Pasquini SC, Sheldrake M, Garcia MN (2018). Plant responses to fertilization experiments in lowland, species-rich, tropical forests. Ecology, 99, 1129-1138.
DOI URL |
| [40] |
Xiang W, Li L, Ouyang S, Xiao W, Zeng L, Chen L, Lei P, Deng X, Zeng Y, Fang J, Forrester DI (2021). Effects of stand age on tree biomass partitioning and allometric equations in Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) plantations. European Journal of Forest Research, 140, 317-332.
DOI URL |
| [41] | Xie H, Zhang QF, Zeng QX, Li YX, Ma YP, Lin HY, Liu YY, Yin YF, Chen YM (2020). Nitrogen application drives the transformation of phosphorus fractions in Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation by changing microbial biomass phosphorus. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 39, 3934-3942. |
| [谢欢, 张秋芳, 曾泉鑫, 李宇轩, 马亚培, 林惠瑛, 刘苑苑, 尹云锋, 陈岳民 (2020). 施氮通过改变微生物生物量磷驱动杉木人工林土壤磷组分转化. 生态学杂志, 39, 3934-3942.] | |
| [42] | Zeng QX, Zeng XM, Lin KM, Zhang QF, Cheng L, Zhou JC, Lin QY, Chen YM, Xu JG (2020). Responses of soil phosphorus fractions and microorganisms to nitrogen application in a subtropical Phyllostachys pubescen forest. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 31, 753-760. |
|
[曾泉鑫, 曾晓敏, 林开淼, 张秋芳, 程蕾, 周嘉聪, 林巧玉, 陈岳民, 徐建国 (2020). 亚热带毛竹林土壤磷组分和微生物对施氮的响应. 应用生态学报, 31, 753-760.]
DOI |
|
| [43] | Zhang HZ, Shi LL, Wen D, Yu KL (2016). Soil potential labile but not occluded phosphorus forms increase with forest succession. Biology & Fertility of Soils, 52, 41-51. |
| [44] | Zhang W (2013). Observation of N/S Deposition Fluxes and Investigation of Simulated S Deposition Effect on Soil N2O Production of Castanopsis carlesii Forests. Master degree dissertation, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou. 15-19. |
| [章伟 (2013). N/S沉降通量观测及模拟氮沉降对米槠林土壤N2O产生影响研究. 硕士学位论文, 福建师范大学, 福州. 15-19.] |
| [1] | 张安宁, 肖亚宁, 赵霞, 张淼, 崔瀚文, 陈书燕, 安黎哲. 青藏高原灌木化与氮添加对土壤线虫及功能性状的交互作用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(预发表): 0-. |
| [2] | 李燚, 黄欢, 赵艳超, 陈立同. 养分添加对不同海拔高寒草甸群落多样性及组成的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(预发表): 0-. |
| [3] | 林琳琳, 肖劲祥, 黄深深, 赵杨梅, 张德旭, 程毅康, 龙文兴. 磷添加对热带云雾林幼苗及幼树功能性状的影响[J]. , 2026, 50(预发表): 0-. |
| [4] | 杨密, 鲁梦珍, 冯治洋, 袁旭东, 赵小祥, 刘峰, 田秋香. 亚热带森林土壤磷有效性与外生菌根优势度的关联分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 639-648. |
| [5] | 刘润洪, 阳柳蓉, 梁慧婷, 申卫军. 丛枝菌根和外生菌根植物磷获取与利用策略研究进展与展望[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 566-583. |
| [6] | 皮惠之, 张秋芳, 孙浩, 曾泉鑫, 彭园珍, 元晓春, 徐建国, 陈岳民. 微生物碳氮不平衡影响罗浮栲林土壤微生物氮利用效率对氮富集的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(1): 34-44. |
| [7] | 戴允泽, 姚良锦, 陈淼, 徐小牛. 氮磷添加对常绿阔叶林土壤团聚体稳定性及其碳氮含量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(1): 55-69. |
| [8] | 张法伟, 李红琴, 祝景彬, 樊博, 周华坤, 李英年, 梁乃申. 氮添加和降水改变对高寒草甸生态系统地上与地下碳储的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1399-1409. |
| [9] | 冯梅, 欧阳胜男, 李迈和, 周晓倩, 铁烈华, 申卫军, 段洪浪. 前期氮添加对无梗花栎幼苗干旱响应中地上-地下碳氮分配动态的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1527-1542. |
| [10] | 张斌, 张浩成, 乔天, 吕治兵, 许亚男, 李雪芹, 原向阳, 冯美臣, 张美俊. 接种丛枝菌根真菌对干旱胁迫燕麦非结构性碳水化合物及碳氮磷化学计量特征的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(7): 1082-1095. |
| [11] | 唐远翔, 熊仕臣, 朱洪锋, 张新生, 游成铭, 刘思凝, 谭波, 徐振锋. 长期氮添加对四川盆地西缘常绿阔叶林优势树种凋落叶产量及碳氮磷归还的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(5): 720-731. |
| [12] | 上官瑶瑶, 苏世平, 顾雪丹, 张正中, 赵祜, 李毅, 魏星宇. 红砂幼苗对光周期和光质配比的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(5): 788-800. |
| [13] | 郝杰, 刁华杰, 苏原, 武帅楷, 高阳阳, 梁雯君, 牛慧敏, 杨倩雯, 常婕, 王袼, 许雯丽, 马腾飞, 董宽虎, $\boxed{\hbox{王常慧}}$. 降水调控农牧交错带盐渍化草地净初级生产力对氮添加及刈割的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(5): 710-719. |
| [14] | 李欣怡, 张丽芳, 吴友贵, 郭静, 兰荣光, 吕洪飞, 于明坚. 不同海拔高度下百山祖冷杉幼苗的生长特征及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(4): 610-623. |
| [15] | 闫小莉, 刘贵梅, 李小玉, 江宇翔, 全小强, 王燕茹, 曲鲁平, 汤行昊. 不同氮添加水平和铵硝态氮配比环境下木荷幼苗光合及叶绿素荧光特性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(4): 624-637. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2026 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19