Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2007, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 300-304.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0034
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
					
													WANG Zhen-Yu1,2, LÁ Jin-Yin1, LI Feng-Min1,2,*(
), XU Bing-Cheng1,2
												  
						
						
						
					
				
Received:2005-08-15
															
							
															
							
																	Accepted:2006-03-28
															
							
																	Online:2007-08-15
															
							
																	Published:2007-03-30
															
						Contact:
								LI Feng-Min   
													WANG Zhen-Yu, LÁ Jin-Yin, LI Feng-Min, XU Bing-Cheng. EFFECT OF ROOT EXCISION ON COMPETITIVE ABILITY AND YIELD OF WINTER WHEAT[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2007, 31(2): 300-304.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.17521/cjpe.2007.0034
| 处理  Treatment  |  籽粒产量 Yield (g·m-2) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | D | |||||||||||||||||
| A | 464.5±4.6b | 421.9±5.7a | ||||||||||||||||
| B | 575.0±7.6a | 390.7±10.1b | ||||||||||||||||
| Hc | 223.5±4.6d | 203.9±5.8d | ||||||||||||||||
| Hn | 284.4±7.5c | 307.0±2.4c | ||||||||||||||||
Table 1 Grain yield in monoculture and mixture of two root treatment
| 处理  Treatment  |  籽粒产量 Yield (g·m-2) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | D | |||||||||||||||||
| A | 464.5±4.6b | 421.9±5.7a | ||||||||||||||||
| B | 575.0±7.6a | 390.7±10.1b | ||||||||||||||||
| Hc | 223.5±4.6d | 203.9±5.8d | ||||||||||||||||
| Hn | 284.4±7.5c | 307.0±2.4c | ||||||||||||||||
| W | D | RYT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | A | B | A | B | 
| 0.96d | 0.99c | 0.96d | 1.58a | 0.98c | 1.26b | 
Table 2 Relative yield of root excision (A) and non-excision (B) in mixture
| W | D | RYT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | A | B | A | B | 
| 0.96d | 0.99c | 0.96d | 1.58a | 0.98c | 1.26b | 
| 处理  Treatment  |  株高  Height (cm)  |  穗重  Spike weight (g·m-2)  |  地上部生物量  Aerial biomass (g·m-2)  |  根重  Root weight (g·m-2)  |  根冠比  Root/shoot ratio (%)  |  |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | A | 79.1b | 634.9c | 1 223.0d | 156.1e | 12d | 
| B | 83.2a | 798.6a | 1 535.4b | 227.1c | 14c | |
| D | A | 73.6cd | 606.4d | 1 107.6f | 181.1d | 17b | 
| B | 74.4c | 556.9e | 1 165.0e | 244.7b | 21a | |
| W | Hc | 78.3b | 569.8e | 1 184.6e | 280.3a | 20a | 
| Hn | 78.7b | 787.0a | 1 434.4c | |||
| D | Hc | 71.2e | 552.4e | 1 098.8f | 221.6c | 18b | 
| Hn | 72.0e | 750.2b | 1 570.4a | |||
Table 3 Height, spike weight, aerial biomass, root weight and root/shoot ratio
| 处理  Treatment  |  株高  Height (cm)  |  穗重  Spike weight (g·m-2)  |  地上部生物量  Aerial biomass (g·m-2)  |  根重  Root weight (g·m-2)  |  根冠比  Root/shoot ratio (%)  |  |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | A | 79.1b | 634.9c | 1 223.0d | 156.1e | 12d | 
| B | 83.2a | 798.6a | 1 535.4b | 227.1c | 14c | |
| D | A | 73.6cd | 606.4d | 1 107.6f | 181.1d | 17b | 
| B | 74.4c | 556.9e | 1 165.0e | 244.7b | 21a | |
| W | Hc | 78.3b | 569.8e | 1 184.6e | 280.3a | 20a | 
| Hn | 78.7b | 787.0a | 1 434.4c | |||
| D | Hc | 71.2e | 552.4e | 1 098.8f | 221.6c | 18b | 
| Hn | 72.0e | 750.2b | 1 570.4a | |||
| 处理  Treatment  |  穗数  Spike number (m-2)  |  穗粒数  Kernels per spike (m-2)  |  千粒重 1 000  kernel weight (g)  |  穗粒重 Kernel weight  per spike (g)  |  |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | A | B | A | B | A | B | ||
| W | 单播 Monocultures | 40.4b | 54.2b | 38.2a | 38.7b | 36.8b | 39.0a | 1.031a | 0.801d | 
| 混播 Mixture | 44.9b | 60.2a | 37.1b | 38.2c | 36.4b | 38.7a | 0.976b | 0.943c | |
| D | 单播 Monocultures | 37.5c | 43.0c | 35.7c | 39.6a | 41.0a | 37.6b | 1.033a | 1.002b | 
| 混播 Mixture | 35.6c | 45.5c | 36.4c | 37.8c | 38.7b | 36.2b | 1.041a | 1.123a | |
Table 4 Yield characteristics in monoculture and mixture of two root treatment
| 处理  Treatment  |  穗数  Spike number (m-2)  |  穗粒数  Kernels per spike (m-2)  |  千粒重 1 000  kernel weight (g)  |  穗粒重 Kernel weight  per spike (g)  |  |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | A | B | A | B | A | B | ||
| W | 单播 Monocultures | 40.4b | 54.2b | 38.2a | 38.7b | 36.8b | 39.0a | 1.031a | 0.801d | 
| 混播 Mixture | 44.9b | 60.2a | 37.1b | 38.2c | 36.4b | 38.7a | 0.976b | 0.943c | |
| D | 单播 Monocultures | 37.5c | 43.0c | 35.7c | 39.6a | 41.0a | 37.6b | 1.033a | 1.002b | 
| 混播 Mixture | 35.6c | 45.5c | 36.4c | 37.8c | 38.7b | 36.2b | 1.041a | 1.123a | |
| 处理  Treatment  |  分蘖数  Tiller number  |  收获指数  Harvesting index  |  |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | A | B | ||
| W | 单播  Monocultures  |  2.58a | 2.71b | 0.41a | 0.37b | 
| 混播  Mixture  |  2.16b | 3.11a | 0.38b | 0.40a | |
| D | 单播  Monocultures  |  2.10b | 2.32c | 0.38b | 0.33c | 
| 混播  Mixture  |  1.97c | 2.74b | 0.37b | 0.39a | |
Table 5 Average tiller in monoculture and mixture of two root treatment
| 处理  Treatment  |  分蘖数  Tiller number  |  收获指数  Harvesting index  |  |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | A | B | ||
| W | 单播  Monocultures  |  2.58a | 2.71b | 0.41a | 0.37b | 
| 混播  Mixture  |  2.16b | 3.11a | 0.38b | 0.40a | |
| D | 单播  Monocultures  |  2.10b | 2.32c | 0.38b | 0.33c | 
| 混播  Mixture  |  1.97c | 2.74b | 0.37b | 0.39a | |
| [1] | Donald CM (1968). The breeding of crop ideotype. Euphytica, 17,385-403. | 
| [2] | Donald CM (1981). Competitive plants, communal plants, and yield in wheat crops. In: Evans LT, Peacock WJ eds. Wheat Science—Today and Tomorrow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 223-247. | 
| [3] | Donald CM, Hamblin J (1983). The convergent evolution of annual seed crops in agriculture. Advances in Agronomy, 36,97-143. | 
| [4] | Evans LT (1993). Crop Evolution, Adaptation and Yield. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. | 
| [5] | Guo AH(郭安红), Li FM(李凤民), Li ZX (李召祥), Pang BS (庞斌双), Shan L (山仑) (1999). Effect of topsoil drought and root signals on yield formation of spring wheat. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology(应用生态学报), 10,689-695. (in Chinese with English abstract) | 
| [6] | Hu YJ(胡延吉) (2003). Competitive ability of two winter wheat cultivars with different adaptability. Acta Agronomica Sinica(作物学报), 29,175-180. (in Chinese with English abstract) | 
| [7] | Hurd EA (1974). Phonology and drought tolerance in wheat. Agricultural Meteorology, 14,39-55. | 
| [8] | Liu HS (刘洪升), Li FM (李凤民) (2003). The study of spring wheat root function efficiency under water stress conditions. Acta Botanica Boreal-Occidentalia Sinica (西北植物学报), 23,942-948. (in Chinese with English abstract) | 
| [9] | Meekins JF, McCarthy BC (1999). Competitive ability of Alliaria petiolata (garlic mustard, Brassicaceae), an invasive nonindigenous forest herb. International Journal of Plant Science, 160,743-752. | 
| [10] | Passioura JB (1983). Roots and drought resistance. Agricultural Water Management, 7,265-280. | 
| [11] | Wu ZS(吴兆苏) (1990). Wheat Breeding (小麦育种学). China Agriculture Press, Beijing, 206-272. (in Chinese) | 
| [12] | Weiner J (2003). Ecology—the science of agriculture in the 21st century. Journal of Agricultural Science, 141,371-377. | 
| [13] | Zhang DY, Sun GJ, Jiang XH (1999). Donald's ideotype and growth redundancy: a game theoretical analysis. Field Crops Research, 61,179-187. | 
| [14] | Zhang DY, Wang G (1994). Evolutionarily stable reproductive strategies in sexual organisms: an integrated approach to life history evolution and sex allocation. American Naturalist, 144,65-75. | 
| [15] | Zhang R(张荣), Zhang DY(张大勇) (2000). A comparative study on root redundancy in spring wheat varieties released in different years in semi-arid area. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica(植物生态学报), 24,298-303. (in Chinese with English abstract) | 
| [16] | Zhang R (张荣), Zhang DY (张大勇), Yuan BZ(原保忠), Lin K(林魁), Wei H(魏虹) (1999). A study on the relationship between competitive ability and productive performance of spring wheat in semi-arid regions of loess plateau. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 23,205-210. (in Chinese with English abstract) | 
| [17] | Zhao SL(赵松岭), Li FM(李凤民), Zhang DY(张大勇), Duan SS (段舜山) (1997). Crop production is a population process. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 17,100-104. (in Chinese with English abstract) | 
| [1] | Hao-Ran BAI Meng HOU Yan-Jie LIU. Effects of the invasion of Cenchrus spinifex and drought on productivity of Leymus chinensis community [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(5): 577-589. | 
| [2] | MA Chang-Qin, HUANG Hai-Long, PENG Zheng-Lin, WU Chun-Ze, WEI Qing-Yu, JIA Hong-Tao, WEI Xing. Response of compound leaf types and photosynthetic function of male and female Fraxinus mandschurica to different habitats [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(9): 1287-1297. | 
| [3] | SHI Meng-Jiao, LI Bin, YI Li-Ta, LIU Mei-Hua. Sexual divergence of Populus deltoides seedlings growth and ecophysiological response to drought and rewatering [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(8): 1159-1170. | 
| [4] | LIU Jian-Xin, LIU Rui-Rui, LIU Xiu-Li, JIA Hai-Yan, BU Ting, LI Na. Regulation of exogenous hydrogen sulfide on photosynthetic carbon metabolism in Avena nude under saline-alkaline stress [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(3): 374-388. | 
| [5] | YU Jun-Rui, WAN Chun-Yan, ZHU Shi-Dan. Hydraulic vulnerability segmentation in woody plant species from tropical and subtropical karst forests [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(11): 1576-1584. | 
| [6] | CHEN Tu-Qiang, XU Gui-Qing, LIU Shen-Si, LI Yan. Hydraulic traits adjustments and nonstructural carbohydrate dynamics of Haloxylon ammodendron under drought stress [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(10): 1407-1421. | 
| [7] | WU Min, TIAN Yu, FAN Da-Yong, ZHANG Xiang-Xue. Hydraulic regulation of Populus tomentosa and Acer truncatum under drought stress [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(9): 1086-1097. | 
| [8] | LI Yi-Ding, SANG Qing-Tian, ZHANG Hao, LIU Long-Chang, PAN Qing-Min, WANG Yu, LIU Wei, YUAN Wen-Ping. Effects of air and soil humidification on the growth of young Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica trees in semi-arid area of Nei Mongol, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(9): 1077-1085. | 
| [9] | ZHOU Jie, YANG Xiao-Dong, WANG Ya-Yun, LONG Yan-Xin, WANG Yan, LI Bo-Rui, SUN Qi-Xing, SUN Nan. Difference in adaptation strategy between Haloxylon ammodendron and Alhagi sparsifolia to drought [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(9): 1064-1076. | 
| [10] | YU Shui-Jin, WANG Juan, ZHANG Chun-Yu, ZHAO Xiu-Hai. Impact and mechanism of maintaining biomass stability in a temperate coniferous and broadleaved mixed forest [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(6): 632-641. | 
| [11] | XIONG Shu-Ping, CAO Wen-Bo, CAO Rui, ZHANG Zhi-Yong, FU Xin-Lu, XU Sai-Jun, PAN Hu-Qiang, WANG Xiao-Chun, MA Xin-Ming. Effects of horizontal structure on canopy vertical structure, microenvironment and yield of Triticum aestivum [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(2): 188-196. | 
| [12] | LIN Yong, CHEN Zhi, YANG Meng, CHEN Shi-Ping, GAO Yan-Hong, LIU Ran, HAO Yan-Bin, XIN Xiao-Ping, ZHOU Li, YU Gui-Rui. Temporal and spatial variations of ecosystem photosynthetic parameters in arid and semi-arid areas of China and its influencing factors [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(12): 1461-1472. | 
| [13] | ZANG Yong-Xin, MA Jian-Ying, ZHOU Xiao-Bing, TAO Ye, YIN Ben-Feng, Shayaguli JIGEER, ZHANG Yuan-Ming. Effects of extreme drought and extreme precipitation on aboveground productivity of ephemeral plants across different slope positions along sand dunes [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(12): 1537-1550. | 
| [14] | Yang ZHAO, Jun-Wei LUAN, Yi WANG, Huai YANG, Shi-Rong LIU. Effects of simulated drought and phosphorus addition on nitrogen mineralization in tropical lowland rain forests [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(1): 102-113. | 
| [15] | Fei LI, Ming-Wei SUN, Shang-Zhi ZHONG, Wen-Zheng SONG, Xiao-Yue ZHONG, Wei SUN. Photosynthetic physiology and growth adaptation of herbages with different photosynthetic pathways in response to drought-rehydration [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(1): 74-87. | 
| Viewed | ||||||
| 
										Full text | 
									
										 | 
								|||||
| 
										Abstract | 
									
										 | 
								|||||
	Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology 
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn