葡萄园生态系统碳源/汇及碳减排策略研究进展

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2019.0252

植物生态学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3): 179-191.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2019.0252

所属专题：碳循环

• 综述 • 下一篇

葡萄园生态系统碳源/汇及碳减排策略研究进展

张亮¹,王志磊¹,薛婷婷¹,郝笑云¹,杨晨露¹,高飞飞¹,王莹¹,韩星¹,李华^1,^2,^3,^*(),王华^1,^2,^3,^*()

¹西北农林科技大学葡萄酒学院, 陕西杨凌 712100
²中国葡萄酒产业技术研究院, 银川 750000
³陕西省葡萄与葡萄酒工程研究中心, 陕西杨凌 712100

收稿日期:2019-09-25 接受日期:2020-01-08 出版日期:2020-03-20 发布日期:2020-03-26
通讯作者: 李华,王华
基金资助:
国家林业和草原局林业科技成果推广项目(K3130217005);国家重点研发计划(2019YFD1002500)

Progress in studies of carbon source/sink and emission reduction strategies in vineyard ecosystem

ZHANG Liang¹,WANG Zhi-Lei¹,XUE Ting-Ting¹,HAO Xiao-Yun¹,YANG Chen-Lu¹,GAO Fei-Fei¹,WANG Ying¹,HAN Xing¹,LI Hua^1,^2,^3,^*(),WANG Hua^1,^2,^3,^*()

¹College of Enology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
²Wine Industrial Technology Research Institute of China, Yinchuan 750000, China
³Shaanxi Engineering Research Center for Viti-Viniculture, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China

Received:2019-09-25 Accepted:2020-01-08 Online:2020-03-20 Published:2020-03-26
Contact: LI Hua,WANG Hua
Supported by:
Science and Technology Achievements Promotion Program of National Forestry and Grassland Administration(K3130217005);National Key R&D Program of China(2019YFD1002500)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

葡萄园生态系统是农业生态系统的重要组成部分, 集中连片栽培的葡萄园具有重要的生态价值。开展葡萄园生态系统碳源/汇的研究, 是完整探讨葡萄园生态系统碳循环必不可少的内容。随着葡萄生态学研究的进一步深入, 如何直观地揭示葡萄园生态系统碳循环规律和碳汇功能已经成为葡萄生态学领域关注的热点问题。研究发现, 葡萄园生态系统固定大量碳, 将碳封存在葡萄果实等一年生器官、主干等多年生器官以及土壤碳库中。葡萄园生态系统碳输入量大于碳输出量, 是碳汇; 土壤是葡萄园生态系统最大的碳库, 占总碳储量的70%, 尤其是土藤界面; 覆盖和免耕作为葡萄园的碳减排策略, 可以减少碳排放, 提高葡萄园土壤肥力。基于此, 为了阐明葡萄园生态系统的碳汇价值, 该文围绕葡萄生态学最新研究进展, 系统回顾了葡萄园生态系统中碳循环规律、碳汇研究进展及碳减排策略, 为葡萄生态学的研究提供理论基础, 并对本领域未来的研究方向和应用前景进行展望。

关键词: 葡萄园生态系统, 碳循环, 碳源, 碳汇, 碳储量, 碳减排策略

Abstract:

The vineyard ecosystem is an important part of agro-ecosystem, and contiguous vineyards have important ecological values. The research on carbon source/sink in vineyard ecosystem is an indispensable content of our understanding of carbon cycling. The mechanisms of carbon cycling and the carbon sink function of vineyard ecosystem have become hot topics. We found that a large amount of carbon was fixed in vineyard ecosystem that was distributed in annual organs (fruit, etc), perennial organs (trunk, etc) and soil carbon pool. The carbon input flux of the vineyard ecosystem was greater than the carbon output flux, suggesting a carbon sink. Soil was the largest carbon pool of vineyard ecosystem, accounting for 70% of total carbon stock, especially the soil-vines interface. Covering and non-tillage can reduce carbon emissions and increase soil fertility in vineyards. In order to clarify the carbon sink functions of vineyard ecosystem, we reviewed the latest research progress in the field, including the mechanisms of carbon cycling, and the strategies of carbon emission reduction. This paper provides a theoretical basis and prospects for future research directions and application.

Key words: vineyard ecosystem, carbon cycling, carbon source, carbon sink, carbon stock, carbon reduction strategies

张亮, 王志磊, 薛婷婷, 郝笑云, 杨晨露, 高飞飞, 王莹, 韩星, 李华, 王华. 葡萄园生态系统碳源/汇及碳减排策略研究进展. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(3): 179-191. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2019.0252

ZHANG Liang, WANG Zhi-Lei, XUE Ting-Ting, HAO Xiao-Yun, YANG Chen-Lu, GAO Fei-Fei, WANG Ying, HAN Xing, LI Hua, WANG Hua. Progress in studies of carbon source/sink and emission reduction strategies in vineyard ecosystem. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2020, 44(3): 179-191. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2019.0252

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2019.0252

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2020/V44/I3/179

图/表 5

参考文献 86

[1]	Agnelli A, Bol R, Trumbore SE, Dixon L, Cocco S, Corti G (2014). Carbon and nitrogen in soil and vine roots in harrowed and grass-covered vineyards. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 193, 70-82.
[2]	Basche AD, Miguez FE, Kaspar TC, Castellano MJ (2014). Do cover crops increase or decrease nitrous oxide emissions? A meta-analysis. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 69, 471-482. DOI URL
[3]	Bates TR, Dunst RM, Joy P (2002). Seasonal dry matter, starch, and nutrient distribution in ‘concord’ grapevine roots. HortScience, 37, 313-316. DOI URL
[4]	Bauerle TL, Smart DR, Bauerle WL, Stockert C, Eissenstat DM (2008). Root foraging in response to heterogeneous soil moisture in two grapevines that differ in potential growth rate. New Phytologist, 179, 857-866. DOI URL
[5]	Baumgartner K, Steenwerth KL, Veilleux L (2008). Cover-crop systems affect weed communities in a California vineyard. Weed Science, 56, 596-605. DOI URL
[6]	Bosco S, Di Bene C, Galli M, Remorini D, Massai R, Bonari E (2011). Greenhouse gas emissions in the agricultural phase of wine production in the Maremma rural district in Tuscany, Italy. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 6, e15. DOI: 10.4081/ija.2011.e15.
[7]	Bremner JM (1997). Sources of nitrous oxide in soils. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 49, 7-16. DOI URL
[8]	Brunori E, Farina R, Biasi R (2016). Sustainable viticulture: the carbon-sink function of the vineyard agro-ecosystem. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 223, 10-21.
[9]	Buermann W, Lintner BR, Koven CD, Angert A, Pinzon JE, Tucker CJ, Fung IY (2007). The changing carbon cycle at Mauna Loa Observatory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 4249-4254.
[10]	Carlisle EA, Steenwerth KL, Smart DR (2006). Effects of land use on soil respiration: conversion of oak woodlands to vineyards. Journal of Environmental Quality, 35, 1396-1404. DOI URL
[11]	Celette F, Findeling A, Gary C (2009). Competition for nitrogen in an unfertilized intercropping system: the case of an association of grapevine and grass cover in a Mediterranean climate. European Journal of Agronomy, 30, 41-51. DOI URL
[12]	Celette F, Gaudin R, Gary C (2008). Spatial and temporal changes to the water regime of a Mediterranean vineyard due to the adoption of cover cropping. European Journal of Agronomy, 29, 153-162. DOI URL
[13]	Chan KY, Conyers MK, Li GD, Helyar KR, Poile G, Oates A, Barchia IM (2011). Soil carbon dynamics under different cropping and pasture management in temperate Australia: results of three long-term experiments. Soil Research, 49, 320-328. DOI URL
[14]	Chen SC, Martin MP, Saby NPA, Walter C, Angers DA, Arrouays D (2018). Fine resolution map of top- and subsoil carbon sequestration potential in France. Science of the Total Environment, 630, 389-400. DOI URL
[15]	Chiarawipa R, Wang Y, Zhang XZ, Han ZH (2013). Growing season carbon dynamics and stocks in relation to vine ages under a vineyard agroecosystem in Northern China. American Journal of Plant Physiology, 8, 1-16. DOI URL
[16]	Chiriacò MV, Belli C, Chiti T, Trotta C, Sabbatini S (2019). The potential carbon neutrality of sustainable viticulture showed through a comprehensive assessment of the greenhouse gas (GHG) budget of wine production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 225, 435-450. DOI URL
[17]	Colman T, Päster P (2007). Red, white and ‘green’: the cost of carbon in the global wine trade. American Association of Wine Economists, 9, 1-19.
[18]	Delgado JA, Dillon MA, Sparks RT, Essah SYC (2007). A decade of advances in cover crops: cover crops with limited irrigation can increase yields, crop quality, and nutrient and water use efficiencies while protecting the environment. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 62, 110-117.
[19]	Deurer M, Müller K, Kim I, Huh KY, Young I, Jun GI, Clothier BE (2012). Can minor compaction increase soil carbon sequestration? A case study in a soil under a wheel-track in an orchard. Geoderma, 183-184, 74-79. DOI URL
[20]	Dobrei A, Nistor E, Sala F, Dobrei A (2015). Tillage practices in the context of climate change and a sustainable viticulture. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 7, 500-504. DOI URL
[21]	DuPont ST, Culman SW, Ferris H, Buckley DH, Glover JD (2010). No-tillage conversion of harvested perennial grassland to annual cropland reduces root biomass, decreases active carbon stocks, and impacts soil biota. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 137, 25-32.
[22]	Eldon J, Gershenson A (2015). Effects of cultivation and alternative vineyard management practices on soil carbon storage in diverse Mediterranean landscapes: a review of the literature. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 39, 516-550. DOI URL
[23]	Fang YL, Hui ZM, Chen J, He JL, Zhang ZW (2006). Effects of water stress on photosynthetic properties of grapevine. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 24, 135-138.
	[ 房玉林, 惠竹梅, 陈洁, 何建林, 张振文 (2006). 水分胁迫对葡萄光合特性的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 24, 135-138.]
[24]	Feyereisen GW, Wilson BN, Sands GR, Strock JS, Porter PM (2006). Potential for a rye cover crop to reduce nitrate loss in southwestern Minnesota. Agronomy Journal, 98, 1416-1426. DOI URL
[25]	Fidelibus MW (2014). Grapevine cultivars, trellis systems, and mechanization of the California raisin industry. HortTechnology, 24, 285-289. DOI URL
[26]	Fusi A, Guidetti R, Benedetto G (2014). Delving into the environmental aspect of a Sardinian white wine: from partial to total life cycle assessment. Science of the Total Environment, 472, 989-1000. DOI URL
[27]	Garland GM, Suddick E, Burger M, Horwath WR, Six J (2011). Direct N₂O emissions following transition from conventional till to no-till in a cover cropped Mediterranean vineyard (Vitis vinifera). Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 144, 423-428.
[28]	Goosse H (2010). Carbon cycle: degrees of climate feedback. Nature, 463, 438-439. DOI URL
[29]	Govaerts B, Verhulst N, Castellanos-Navarrete A, Sayre KD, Dixon J, Dendooven L (2009). Conservation agriculture and soil carbon sequestration: between myth and farmer reality. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 28, 97-122. DOI URL
[30]	Guo WH, Gao Y (2013). The variation of vineyard net CO₂ exchange under different conditions in northwest arid. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 32, 107-109, 136.
	[ 郭维华, 高云 (2013). 西北旱区葡萄园CO₂净交换量变化规律. 灌溉排水学报, 32, 107-109, 136.]
[31]	Guo WH, Kang SZ, Li FS, Li SE (2014). Variation of NEE and its affecting factors in a vineyard of arid region of northwest China. Atmospheric Environment, 84, 349-354. DOI URL
[32]	Hawk J, Martinson TE (2007). Sustainable viticulture: optimizing nitrogen use in vineyards. New York Fruit Quarterly, 15, 25-29.
[33]	Helgason BL, Walley FL, Germida JJ (2010). No-till soil management increases microbial biomass and alters community profiles in soil aggregates. Applied Soil Ecology, 46, 390-397. DOI URL
[34]	Houghton RA, Goodale CL (2004). Effects of land-use change on the carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems. Geophysical Monograph Series, 153, 85-98.
[35]	Janssens IA, Freiebauer A, Ciais P, Smith P, Nabuurs GJ, Folberth G, Schlamadinger B, Hutjes RWA, Ceulemans R, Schulze ED, Valentini R, Dolman AJ (2003). Europe’s terrestrial biosphere absorbs 7 to 12% of European anthropogenic CO₂ emissions. Science, 300, 1538-1542. DOI URL
[36]	Jastrow JD, Amonette JE, Bailey VL (2007). Mechanisms controlling soil carbon turnover and their potential application for enhancing carbon sequestration. Climatic Change, 80, 5-23. DOI URL
[37]	Kavargiris SE, Mamolos AP, Tsatsarelis CA, Nikolaidou AE, Kalburtji KL (2009). Energy resources’ utilization in organic and conventional vineyards: energy flow, greenhouse gas emissions and biofuel production. Biomass and Bioenergy, 33, 1239-1250. DOI URL
[38]	Kroodsma DA, Field CB (2006). Carbon sequestration in California agriculture, 1980-2000. Ecological Applications, 16, 1975-1985. DOI URL
[39]	Kuyah S, Dietz J, Muthuri C, Jamnadass R, Mwangi P, Coe R, Neufeldt H (2012). Allometric equations for estimating biomass in agricultural landscapes: II. Belowground biomass. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 158, 225-234.
[40]	Lal R (2004). Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science, 304, 1623-1627. DOI URL
[41]	Lejon DPH, Sebastia J, Lamy I, Chaussod R, Ranjard L (2007). Relationships between soil organic status and microbial community density and genetic structure in two agricultural soils submitted to various types of organic management. Microbial Ecology, 53, 650-663. DOI URL
[42]	Li SE, Kang SZ, Zhang L, Li FS, Hao XM, Ortega-Farias S, Guo WH, Ji SS, Wang JT, Jiang XL (2013). Quantifying the combined effects of climatic, crop and soil factors on surface resistance in a maize field. Journal of Hydrology, 489, 124-134. DOI URL
[43]	Liguori G, Gugliuzza G, Inglese P (2009). Evaluating carbon fluxes in orange orchards in relation to planting density. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 147, 637-645. DOI URL
[44]	Longbottom ML, Petrie PR (2015). Role of vineyard practices in generating and mitigating greenhouse gas emissions. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 21, 522-536. DOI URL
[45]	Ludwig B, Geisseler D, Michel K, Joergensen RG, Schulz E, Merbach I, Raupp J, Rauber R, Hu K, Niu L, Liu X (2011). Effects of fertilization and soil management on crop yields and carbon stabilization in soils. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 31, 361-372. DOI URL
[46]	Luo ZK, Wang EL, Sun OJX (2010). Soil carbon change and its responses to agricultural practices in Australian agro- ecosystems: a review and synthesis. Geoderma, 155, 211-223. DOI URL
[47]	Mangalassery S, Sjögersten S, Sparkes DL, Sturrock CJ, Craigon J, Mooney SJ (2014). To what extent can zero tillage lead to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from temperate soils? Scientific Reports, 4, 4586. DOI: 10.1038/srep04586. DOI URL
[48]	Marras S, Masia S, Duce P, Spano D, Sirca C (2015). Carbon footprint assessment on a mature vineyard. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 214-215, 350-356. DOI URL
[49]	McGourty G, Nosera J, Tylicki S, Toth A (2008). Self-reseeding annual legumes evaluated as cover crops for untilled vineyards. California Agriculture, 62, 191-194. DOI URL
[50]	Morandé JA, Stockert CM, Liles GC, Williams JN, Smart DR, Viers JH (2017). From berries to blocks: carbon stock quantification of a California vineyard. Carbon Balance and Management, 12, 5-17. DOI URL
[51]	Morlat R, Chaussod R (2008). Long-term additions of organic amendments in a Loire Valley vineyard. I. Effects on properties of a calcareous sandy soil. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 59, 353-363.
[52]	Mosier AR, Halvorson AD, Peterson GA, Robertson GP, Sherrod L (2005). Measurement of net global warming potential in three agroecosystems. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 72, 67-76. DOI URL
[53]	Nendel C, Kersebaum KC (2004). A simple model approach to simulate nitrogen dynamics in vineyard soils. Ecological Modelling, 177, 1-15. DOI URL
[54]	Nistor E, Dobrei AG, Dobrei A, Camen D, Sala F, Prundeanu H (2018). N₂O, CO₂, production, and C sequestration in vineyards: a review. Water Air & Soil Pollution, 229, 112-122.
[55]	Novara A, Gristina L, Kuzyakov Y, Schillaci C, Laudicina VA, La Mantia T (2013). Turnover and availability of soil organic carbon under different Mediterranean land-uses as estimated by ¹³C natural abundance . European Journal of Soil Science, 64, 466-475. DOI URL
[56]	Novara A, Gristina L, Saladino SS, Santoro A, Cerdà A (2011). Soil erosion assessment on tillage and alternative soil managements in a Sicilian vineyard. Soil & Tillage Research, 117, 140-147.
[57]	Novara A, Minacapilli M, Santoro A, Rodrigo-Comino J, Carrubba A, Sarno M, Venezia G, Gristina L (2019). Real cover crops contribution to soil organic carbon sequestration in sloping vineyard. Science of the Total Environment, 652, 300-306. DOI URL
[58]	Paradelo R, Moldes AB, Barral MT (2011). Carbon and nitrogen mineralization in a vineyard soil amended with grape marc vermicompost. Waste Management & Research, 29, 1177-1184.
[59]	Peregrina F, Larrieta C, Ibáñez S, García-Escudero E (2010). Labile organic matter, aggregates, and stratification ratios in a semiarid vineyard with cover crops. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 74, 2120-2130. DOI URL
[60]	Peregrina F, Pérez-Álvarez EP, García-Escudero E (2014). The short term influence of aboveground biomass cover crops on C sequestration and β-glucosidase in a vineyard ground under semiarid conditions. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 12, 1000-1007. DOI URL
[61]	Petersen SO, Mutegi JK, Hansen EM, Munkholm LJ (2011). Tillage effects on N₂O emissions as influenced by a winter cover crop. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 43, 1509-1517. DOI URL
[62]	Pizzigallo ACI, Granai C, Borsa S (2008). The joint use of LCA and emergy evaluation for the analysis of two Italian wine farms. Journal of Environmental Management, 86, 396-406. DOI URL
[63]	Post WM, Kwon KC (2000). Soil carbon sequestration and land-use change: processes and potential. Global Change Biology, 6, 317-327. DOI URL
[64]	Powlson DS, Whitmore AP, Goulding KWT (2011). Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change: a critical re-examination to identify the true and the false. European Journal of Soil Science, 62, 42-55. DOI URL
[65]	Rugani B, Vázquez-Rowe I, Benedetto G, Benetto E (2013). A comprehensive review of carbon footprint analysis as an extended environmental indicator in the wine sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 54, 61-77. DOI URL
[66]	Sainju UM, Singh BP, Whitehead WF (2002). Long-term effects of tillage, cover crops, and nitrogen fertilization on organic carbon and nitrogen concentrations in sandy loam soils in Georgia, USA. Soil and Tillage Research, 63, 167-179. DOI URL
[67]	Sanderman J, Baldock JA (2010). Accounting for soil carbon sequestration in national inventories: a soil scientist’s perspective. Environmental Research Letters, 5, 034003. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/5/3/034003. DOI URL
[68]	Smith LC, MacDonald GM, Velichko AA, Beilman DW, Borisova OK, Frey KE, Kremenetski KV, Sheng Y (2004). Siberian peatlands a net carbon sink and global methane source since the early Holocene. Science, 303, 353-356. DOI URL
[69]	Smith P (2004). How long before a change in soil organic carbon can be detected? Global Change Biology, 10, 1878-1883. DOI URL
[70]	Smith SJ, Wigley ML (2000). Global warming potentials: 1. Climatic implications of emissions reductions. Climatic Change, 44, 445-457. DOI URL
[71]	Soosay C, Fearne A, Dent B (2012). Sustainable value chain analysis—A case study of Oxford Landing from “vine to dine”. Supply Chain Management, 17, 68-77. DOI URL
[72]	Steenwerth KL, Belina KM (2008). Cover crops enhance soil organic matter, carbon dynamics and microbiological function in a vineyard agroecosystem. Applied Soil Ecology, 40, 359-369. DOI URL
[73]	Steenwerth KL, Belina KM (2010). Vineyard weed management practices influence nitrate leaching and nitrous oxide emissions. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 138, 127-131.
[74]	Tesic D, Keller M, Hutton R (2007). Influence of vineyard floor management practices on grapevine vegetative growth, yield, and fruit composition. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 58, 1-11.
[75]	Tezza L, Vendrame N, Pitacco A (2019). Disentangling the carbon budget of a vineyard: the role of soil management. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 272, 52-62.
[76]	Tian Y, Chen GM, Li JF, Xiang XY, Liu Y, Li HY (2018). Present development of grape industry in the world. Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 38(6), 96-105.
	[ 田野, 陈冠铭, 李家芬, 向雄鹰, 刘扬, 李宏杨 (2018). 世界葡萄产业发展现状. 热带农业科学, 38(6), 96-105.]
[77]	Vendrame N, Tezza L, Pitacco A (2019). Study of the carbon budget of a temperate-climate vineyard: inter-annual variability of CO₂ flux. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 70, 34-41. DOI URL
[78]	Walther GR, Post E, Convey P, Menzel A, Parmesan C, Beebee TJC, Fromentin JM, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Bairlein F (2002). Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature, 416, 389-395. DOI URL
[79]	Wang L, Li H, Wang H (2017). Climatic regionalization of grape in China II: wine grape varieties regionalization. Chinese Science Bulletin, 62, 1539-1554.
	[ 王蕾, 李华, 王华 (2017). 中国葡萄气候区划II: 酿酒葡萄品种区域化. 科学通报, 62, 1539-1554.]
[80]	West TO, Marland G (2002). A synthesis of carbon sequestration, carbon emissions, and net carbon flux in agriculture: comparing tillage practices in the United States. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 91, 217-232.
[81]	Wightwick AM, Reichman SM, Menzies NW, Allinson G (2013). Industry wide risk assessment: a case study of Cu in Australian vineyard soils. Water Air & Soil Pollution, 224, 1702. DOI: 10.1007/s11270-013-1702-2.
[82]	Williams JN, Hollander AD, OʼGeen AT, Thrupp LA, Hanifin R, Steenwerth K, McGourty G, Jackson LE (2011). Assessment of carbon in woody plants and soil across a vineyard-woodland landscape. Carbon Balance and Management, 6, 11. DOI: 10.1186/1750-0680-6-11. DOI URL
[83]	Wolff MW, Alsina MM, Armstrong-Stockert C, Khalsa SDS, Smart DR (2018). Minimum tillage of a cover crop lowers net GWP and sequesters soil carbon in a California vineyard. Soil and Tillage Research, 175, 244-254. DOI URL
[84]	Yan QD, Su PX (2005). Photosynthetic characteristics of grapvine leaves under different soil moistures. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 25, 1601-1606.
	[ 严巧娣, 苏培玺 (2005). 不同土壤水分条件下葡萄叶片光合特性的比较. 西北植物学报, 25, 1601-1606.]
[85]	Yang JF, Yang XN, Wang JH, Duan YM, Qi XN, Zhang LS (2018). Characteristics of CO₂ flux in a mature apple ( Malus demestica) orchard ecosystem on the Loess Plateau. Environmental Science, 39, 2339-2350.
	[ 杨剑锋, 杨小妮, 王俊花, 段宇敏, 祁香宁, 张林森 (2018). 黄土高原成龄苹果园生态系统CO₂通量特征. 环境科学, 39, 2339-2350.]
[86]	Yu OT, Greenhut RF, O’Geen AT, Mackey B, Horwath WR, Steenwerth KL (2017). Precipitation events and management practices affect greenhouse gas emissions from vineyards in a Mediterranean climate. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 81, 138-152. DOI URL

	葡萄器官 Vine organs	碳储量 Carbon stock (t·hm^-2)	碳去向 Carbon distribution	总碳储量 Total carbon stock (t·hm^-2)	比重 Proportion (%)
一年生器官 Annual organs	果实 Fruit	1.7	26%碳通过皮和种子回归土壤 26% carbon return to soil through skin and seeds	3.4	28
	叶 Leaves	0.6	100%碳通过凋落回归土壤 100% carbon return to soil by litter
	一年生枝 Canes	1.1	50%碳分配给当年浆果 50% carbon allocated to berries
多年生器官 Perennial organs	主干和主蔓 Trunk and cordons	4.8	35%-50%碳分配给当年浆果 35%-50% carbon allocated to berries	8.9	72
多年生器官 Perennial organs	根 Roots	4.1	部分碳分泌到土壤中 Part of carbon secreted into soil	8.9	72

	葡萄器官 Vine organs	碳储量 Carbon stock (t·hm^-2)	碳去向 Carbon distribution	总碳储量 Total carbon stock (t·hm^-2)	比重 Proportion (%)
一年生器官 Annual organs	果实 Fruit	1.7	26%碳通过皮和种子回归土壤 26% carbon return to soil through skin and seeds	3.4	28
	叶 Leaves	0.6	100%碳通过凋落回归土壤 100% carbon return to soil by litter
	一年生枝 Canes	1.1	50%碳分配给当年浆果 50% carbon allocated to berries
多年生器官 Perennial organs	主干和主蔓 Trunk and cordons	4.8	35%-50%碳分配给当年浆果 35%-50% carbon allocated to berries	8.9	72
多年生器官 Perennial organs	根 Roots	4.1	部分碳分泌到土壤中 Part of carbon secreted into soil	8.9	72

管理技术 Management technology	措施 Measures	碳储量变化 Change of carbon stock	控制机理 Mechanisms
农艺措施 Agronomic measures	耕作 Tillage	免耕>耕作 Non-tillage > tillage	干预越小, 系统碳分解越少 Reduce intervention, reduce carbon decomposition of ecosystem
	施肥 Fertilization	碳储量增加 Carbon stock increase	增加土壤有机质 Increase soil organic matter
	喷药 Pesticide	碳储量降低 Carbon stock decrease	增加干预和降低土壤活性 Increase intervention and reduce soil activity
	灌溉 Irrigation	碳储量降低 Carbon stock decrease	增加生态系统的人为干预 Increase human intervention in ecosystem
	修剪 Pruning	碳储量增加 Carbon stock increase	增加土壤有机质 Increase soil organic matter
	收割 Harvest	碳储量增加 Carbon stock increase	增加土壤有机质 Increase soil organic matter
	种植方式 Establishment method	常规葡萄园碳储量低于有机葡萄园 Carbon stock of conventional vineyard lower than organic vineyard	有机葡萄园免耕土壤储存更多有机质 Organic vineyard increases organic matter in non- tillage soil
田间管理 Farmland management	复种 Multiple cropping	碳储量增加 Carbon stock increase	增加土壤有机质 Increase soil organic matter
	覆盖 Covering	碳储量增加 Carbon stock increase	增加土壤有机质 Increase soil organic matter
	轮作 Rotation	碳储量增加 Carbon stock increase	增加土壤有机质 Increase soil organic matter
	运输 Transport	碳储量降低 Carbon stock decrease	增加生态系统的人为干预 Increase human intervention in ecosystem
其他因素 Other factors	区域 Region	不同区域碳储量不同 Different carbon stock in region	不同区域的气候和土壤质地不同 Different climates and soil textures in region
	品种 Variety	红葡萄品种碳储量高于白葡萄品种 Red variety of carbon stock higher than white variety	不同葡萄品种的生物特性不同 Different biological characteristics of variety
	树龄 Age	树龄越大植株碳储量越高 The more carbon stock in the older	葡萄作为碳汇, 逐年积累 Accumulation of vine year by year, as carbon sink
	生长季 Growing season	植株生长季碳储量最高 The most carbon stock in growing season	生长季是一个净碳汇 A net carbon sink
	温度 Temperature	温度越高碳储量越低 The higher temperature, the lower carbon stock	温度越高土壤有机质分解越快 The higher temperature, the faster decomposition of soil organic matter

管理技术 Management technology	措施 Measures	碳储量变化 Change of carbon stock	控制机理 Mechanisms
农艺措施 Agronomic measures	耕作 Tillage	免耕>耕作 Non-tillage > tillage	干预越小, 系统碳分解越少 Reduce intervention, reduce carbon decomposition of ecosystem
	施肥 Fertilization	碳储量增加 Carbon stock increase	增加土壤有机质 Increase soil organic matter
	喷药 Pesticide	碳储量降低 Carbon stock decrease	增加干预和降低土壤活性 Increase intervention and reduce soil activity
	灌溉 Irrigation	碳储量降低 Carbon stock decrease	增加生态系统的人为干预 Increase human intervention in ecosystem
	修剪 Pruning	碳储量增加 Carbon stock increase	增加土壤有机质 Increase soil organic matter
	收割 Harvest	碳储量增加 Carbon stock increase	增加土壤有机质 Increase soil organic matter
	种植方式 Establishment method	常规葡萄园碳储量低于有机葡萄园 Carbon stock of conventional vineyard lower than organic vineyard	有机葡萄园免耕土壤储存更多有机质 Organic vineyard increases organic matter in non- tillage soil
田间管理 Farmland management	复种 Multiple cropping	碳储量增加 Carbon stock increase	增加土壤有机质 Increase soil organic matter
	覆盖 Covering	碳储量增加 Carbon stock increase	增加土壤有机质 Increase soil organic matter
	轮作 Rotation	碳储量增加 Carbon stock increase	增加土壤有机质 Increase soil organic matter
	运输 Transport	碳储量降低 Carbon stock decrease	增加生态系统的人为干预 Increase human intervention in ecosystem
其他因素 Other factors	区域 Region	不同区域碳储量不同 Different carbon stock in region	不同区域的气候和土壤质地不同 Different climates and soil textures in region
	品种 Variety	红葡萄品种碳储量高于白葡萄品种 Red variety of carbon stock higher than white variety	不同葡萄品种的生物特性不同 Different biological characteristics of variety
	树龄 Age	树龄越大植株碳储量越高 The more carbon stock in the older	葡萄作为碳汇, 逐年积累 Accumulation of vine year by year, as carbon sink
	生长季 Growing season	植株生长季碳储量最高 The most carbon stock in growing season	生长季是一个净碳汇 A net carbon sink
	温度 Temperature	温度越高碳储量越低 The higher temperature, the lower carbon stock	温度越高土壤有机质分解越快 The higher temperature, the faster decomposition of soil organic matter

葡萄园生态系统碳源/汇及碳减排策略研究进展

Progress in studies of carbon source/sink and emission reduction strategies in vineyard ecosystem

全文

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 86

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	周建王焓. 森林径级结构研究：从统计描述到理论演绎[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(预发表): 0-0.
[2]	张智洋赵颖慧甄贞. 1986-2022年松花江流域陆地生态系统碳储量动态监测[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(预发表): 0-0.
[3]	张计深, 史新杰, 刘宇诺, 吴阳, 彭守璋. 气候变化下中国潜在自然植被生态系统碳储量动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(4): 428-444.
[4]	陈保冬, 付伟, 伍松林, 朱永官. 菌根真菌在陆地生态系统碳循环中的作用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(1): 1-20.
[5]	李冰, 朱湾湾, 韩翠, 余海龙, 黄菊莹. 降水量变化下荒漠草原土壤呼吸及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(9): 1310-1321.
[6]	徐干君, 吴胜义, 李伟, 赵欣胜, 聂磊超, 唐希颖, 翟夏杰. 陕西黄河湿地自然保护区碳储量估算[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(4): 469-478.
[7]	任培鑫, 李鹏, 彭长辉, 周晓路, 杨铭霞. 洞庭湖流域植被光合物候的时空变化及其对气候变化的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(3): 319-330.
[8]	李万年, 罗益敏, 黄则月, 杨梅. 望天树人工幼林混交对土壤微生物功能多样性与碳源利用的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 1109-1124.
[9]	韩广轩, 李隽永, 屈文笛. 氮输入对滨海盐沼湿地碳循环关键过程的影响及机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(4): 321-333.
[10]	吕亚香, 戚智彦, 刘伟, 孙佳美, 潘庆民. 早春和夏季氮磷添加对内蒙古典型草原退化群落碳交换的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(4): 334-344.
[11]	方精云. 碳中和的生态学透视[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(11): 1173-1176.
[12]	胡宗达, 刘世荣, 罗明霞, 胡璟, 刘兴良, 李亚非, 余昊, 欧定华. 川西亚高山不同演替阶段天然次生林土壤碳氮含量及酶活性特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(9): 973-985.
[13]	郑甲佳, 黄松宇, 贾昕, 田赟, 牟钰, 刘鹏, 查天山. 中国森林生态系统土壤呼吸温度敏感性空间变异特征及影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(6): 687-698.
[14]	夏建阳, 鲁芮伶, 朱辰, 崔二乾, 杜莹, 黄昆, 孙宝玉. 陆地生态系统过程对气候变暖的响应与适应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(5): 494-514.
[15]	邢鹏, 李彪, 韩一萱, 顾秋锦, 万洪秀. 淡水生态系统对全球变化的响应: 研究进展与展望[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(5): 565-574.