植物气孔导度对CO2响应模型的构建

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2020.0326

植物生态学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 420-428.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2020.0326

所属专题：光合作用

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

植物气孔导度对CO₂响应模型的构建

叶子飘¹, 于冯²^,³, 安婷¹, 王复标¹, 康华靖²^,³^,⁴^,^*

¹井冈山大学数理学院, 江西吉安 343009
²温州市农业科学研究院, 浙江温州 325006
³温州市农林渔生态系统增汇减排重点实验室, 浙江温州 325006
⁴浙江省浙南作物育种重点实验室, 浙江温州 325006

收稿日期:2020-10-09 接受日期:2021-01-16 出版日期:2021-04-20 发布日期:2021-03-09
通讯作者: ORCID: *康华靖: 0000-0003-3808-3115(kanghuajing@126.com)
作者简介:* kanghuajing@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(31960054);国家自然科学基金(31560069)

Investigation on CO₂-response model of stomatal conductance for plants

YE Zi-Piao¹, YU Feng²^,³, AN Ting¹, WANG Fu-Biao¹, KANG Hua-Jing²^,³^,⁴^,^*

¹College of Math and Physics, Jinggangshan University, Ji’an, Jiangxi 343009, China
²Wenzhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325006, China
³Wenzhou Key Laboratory of Adding Carbon Sinks and Reducing Carbon Emissions of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery Ecosystem, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325006, China
⁴Southern Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Crop Breeding of Zhejiang Provence, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325006, China

Received:2020-10-09 Accepted:2021-01-16 Online:2021-04-20 Published:2021-03-09
Contact: KANG Hua-Jing
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(31960054);National Natural Science Foundation of China(31560069)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

构建一个普适性的植物叶片气孔导度(g_s)对CO₂浓度响应(g_s-C_a)的模型, 对定量研究植物叶片g_s对CO₂浓度的响应变化尤为必要。该研究运用便携式光合仪(LI-6400)测量了大豆(Glycine max)和小麦(Triticum aestivum)光合作用对CO₂的响应曲线(A_n-C_a), 在比较传统的Michaelis-Menten模型(M-M模型)和叶子飘构建的CO₂响应模型拟合大豆和小麦A_n-C_a效果的基础上, 构建了g_s-C_a响应新模型。然后用新构建的模型拟合大豆和小麦的g_s-C_a曲线, 并将拟合结果与传统模型的拟合结果, 以及与其对应的观测数据进行比较, 以判断所构建模型是否合理。结果显示: 叶子飘构建的A_n-C_a模型可较好地拟合大豆和小麦的A_n-C_a曲线, 确定系数(R²)均高达0.999。M-M模型拟合大豆和小麦的A_n-C_a曲线时的R²虽然也较高, 但在较高CO₂浓度时的拟合曲线偏离观测曲线。因此, 基于叶子飘的A_n-C_a模型构建g_s-C_a模型更为可行。新构建的g_s-C_a模型可较好地拟合大豆和小麦的g_s-C_a曲线, R²分别为0.995和0.994, 而且还可以直接给出最大气孔导度(g_s-max)、最小气孔导度(g_s-min), 以及与g_s-min相对应的CO₂浓度值(C_s-min)。拟合得到大豆和小麦的g_s-max分别为0.686和0.481 mol·m^-2·s^-1, 与其对应的观测值(分别为0.666和0.471 mol·m^-2·s^-1)之间均不存在显著差异; 同样, 拟合得到的大豆和小麦的g_s-min分别为0.271和0.297 mol·m^-2·s^-1, 与其对应的观测值(分别为0.279和0.293 mol·m^-2·s^-1)之间也均不存在显著差异; 此外, 新构建的g_s-C_a模型给出大豆和小麦的C_s-min值分别为741.45和1 112.43 μmol·mol ^-1, 与其对应的观测值(732.78和1 200.34 μmol·mol ^-1)也不存在显著差异。由此可见, 该研究新构建的g_s-C_a模型可作为定量研究植物叶片气孔导度对CO₂浓度变化的有效数学工具。

关键词: 气孔导度, CO₂响应模型, CO₂浓度, 光合作用

Abstract:

Aims To quantify the responses of stomatal conductance (g_s) to CO₂ concentration (g_s-C_a) under current and future climate conditions, it is necessary to build a generally applicable model suitable for simulating this process at plant leaf levels.

Methods The response curves (A_n-C_a) of photosynthesis of soybean (Glycine max) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) to CO₂ were fitted using data collected from a portable photosynthetic apparatus (LI-6400). Based on the comparison between the traditional Michaelis-Menten model (M-M model) and the CO₂ response model developed by Ye, a new g_s-C_a response model was proposed. Then, the measured g_s-C_a curves of soybean and wheat were fitted with the new model. The model results were compared with those of the traditional model and the corresponding observation data to judge the rationality of the model.

Important findings The A_n-C_a model developed by Ye could fit well the A_n-C_a curve of soybean and wheat, and the coefficient of determination (R²) is as high as 0.999. Although the R ² values of M-M model fitting the A_n-C_a curves of soybean and wheat were also high, the fitting curves deviated from the observation at higher CO₂ concentrations. Meanwhile, M-M model greatly overestimated the maximum photosynthetic rate and could not estimate the saturation CO₂ concentrations. Therefore, it was more feasible to developg_s-C_a model based on the A_n-C_a model of Ye. The new model of g_s-C_a could fit well the g_s-C_a curves of soybean and wheat, and the R ² were 0.995 and 0.994, respectively. Moreover, the maximum stomatal conductance (g_s-max), the minimum stomatal conductance (g_s-min) and the CO₂ concentration corresponding to g_s-min (C_s-min) could also be generated directly. g_s-max of soybean and wheat fitted by the g_s-C_a model was 0.686 and 0.481 mol·m^-2·s^-1, respectively, and there was no significant difference between the fitted values and corresponding observation values (0.666 and 0.471 mol·m^-2·s^-1, respectively). The new model of g_s-C_a could also obtain the minimum g_s (g_s-min) of soybean and wheat (0.271 and 0.297 mol·m^-2·s^-1, respectively), and there was also no significant difference between the fitted values and corresponding observation values (0.279 and 0.293 mol·m^-2·s^-1, respectively). In addition, the new model of g_s-C_a generated the C_s-min values of 741.45 and 1 112.43 μmol·mol ^-1for soybean and wheat, respectively, and also showed no significant difference from the observed value (732.78 and 1 200.34 μmol·mol^-1, respectively). Consequently, the g_s-C_a model developed in this paper can be used as an effective mathematical tool to quantitatively study the effect of stomatal conductance on CO₂ concentration.

Key words: stomatal conductance, CO₂ response model, CO₂ concentration, photosynthesis

叶子飘, 于冯, 安婷, 王复标, 康华靖. 植物气孔导度对CO₂响应模型的构建. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(4): 420-428. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2020.0326

YE Zi-Piao, YU Feng, AN Ting, WANG Fu-Biao, KANG Hua-Jing. Investigation on CO₂-response model of stomatal conductance for plants. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2021, 45(4): 420-428. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2020.0326

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2020.0326

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2021/V45/I4/420

图/表 4

参考文献 44

[1]	Allen LH, Kakani VG, Vu JCV, Boote KJ (2011). Elevated CO₂ increases water use efficiency by sustaining photosynthesis of water-limited maize and Sorghum. Journal of Plant Physiology, 168,1909-1918.
[2]	Ball JT, Woodrow IE, Berry JA (1987). A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions //Biggens J. Progress in Photosynthesis Research. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,Dordrecht. 221-224.
[3]	Batke SP, Yiotis C, Elliott-Kingston C, Holohan A, McElwain J (2020). Plant responses to decadal scale increments in atmospheric CO₂ concentration: comparing two stomatal conductance sampling methods. Planta, 251, 52. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-020-03343-z. DOI URL
[4]	Bonan GB (2008). Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science, 320, 1444-1449. DOI URL
[5]	Buckley TN, Mott KA (2013). Modelling stomatal conductance in response to environmental factors. Plant, Cell & Environment, 36, 1691-1699.
[6]	Cheng XF, Zhang FY, Chai SX ( 2010). Stomatal response of spring wheat and related affecting factors under different irrigation treatments. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 21, 36-40.
	[ 成雪峰, 张凤云, 柴守玺 ( 2010). 春小麦对不同灌水处理的气孔反应及其影响因子. 应用生态学报, 21, 36-40.]
[7]	Ding LK, Kan F, Li L, Yue N, Zhou LL, Wei GX ( 2019). Response model of maize to light and CO₂ concentration in semi-arid area of central Gansu Province . Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 47, 86-91.
	[ 丁林凯, 阚飞, 李玲, 岳宁, 周琳琳, 魏国孝 ( 2019). 陇中半干旱区玉米对光和CO₂浓度的响应模型. 江苏农业科学, 47, 86-91.]
[8]	Drake JE, Power SA, Duursma RA, Medlyn BE, Aspinwall MJ, Choat B, Creek D, Eamus D, Maier C, Pfautsch S, Smith RA, Tjoelker MG, Tissue DT (2017). Stomatal and non-stomatal limitations of photosynthesis for four tree species under drought: a comparison of model formulations. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 247, 454-466. DOI URL
[9]	Farquhar GD, Caemmerer S, Berry JA (1980). A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO₂ assimilation in leaves of C₃ species. Planta, 149, 78-90. DOI PMID
[10]	Flexas J, Díaz-Espejo A, Conesa MA, Coopman RE, Douthe C, Gago J, Gallé A, Galmés J, Medrano H, Ribas-Carbo M, Tomàs M, Niinemets Ü (2016). Mesophyll conductance to CO₂ and Rubisco as targets for improving intrinsic water use efficiency in C₃ plants. Plant, Cell & Environment, 39, 965-982.
[11]	Gao GL, Feng Q, Liu XD, Li W ( 2020). Simulating the leaf stomatal conductance of the desert riparian Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb. based on three empirical models. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40, 3486-3494.
	[ 高冠龙, 冯起, 刘贤德, 李伟 ( 2020). 三种经验模型模拟荒漠河岸柽柳叶片气孔导度. 生态学报, 40, 3486-3494.]
[12]	Guo BH, Wang RS, Xiao HJ ( 2018). Response of leaf water potential and stomatal conductance of sea-buckthorn to water stress during seedling stage. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 32, 609-616.
	[ 郭冰寒, 王若水, 肖辉杰 ( 2018). 沙棘苗期叶水势与气孔导度对水分胁迫的响应. 核农学报, 32, 609-616.]
[13]	Guo FY, Ha R, Ma YP, Cao B ( 2019). Effects of elevated CO₂ concentration on photosynthesis characteristics and biomass allocation of Lycium barbarum seedlings. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 39, 302-309.
	[ 郭芳芸, 哈蓉, 马亚平, 曹兵 ( 2019). CO₂浓度升高对宁夏枸杞苗木光合特性及生物量分配影响. 西北植物学报, 39, 302-309.]
[14]	Guo RP, Lin ZH, Mo XG, Yang CL (2010). Responses of crop yield and water use efficiency to climate change in the North China Plain. Agricultural Water Management, 97, 1185-1194. DOI URL
[15]	Harley PC, Thomas RB, Reynolds JF, Strain BR (1992). Modelling photosynthesis of cotton grown in elevated CO₂. Plant, Cell & Environment, 15, 271-282.
[16]	Jarvis PG (1976). The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 273, 593-610. DOI URL
[17]	Köhler IH, MacDonald AJ, Schnyder H (2016). Last-century increases in intrinsic water-use efficiency of grassland communities have occurred over a wide range of vegetation composition, nutrient inputs, and soil pH. Plant Physiology, 170, 881-890. DOI PMID
[18]	Leuning R (1990). Modelling stomatal behavior and photosynthesis of Eucalyptus grandis. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 17, 159-175.
[19]	Leuning R (1995). A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal- photosynthesis model for C₃ plants. Plant, Cell & Environment, 18, 339-355.
[20]	Li F, Liu L, Zhang H, Wang QT, Guo LL, Hao LH, Zhang XX, Cao X, Liang WJ, Zheng YP ( 2018). Effects of CO₂ concentrations on stomatal traits and gas exchange in leaves of soybean . Acta Agronomica Sinica, 44, 1212-1220. DOI URL
	[ 李菲, 刘亮, 张浩, 王清涛, 郭丽丽, 郝立华, 张茜茜, 曹旭, 梁伟佳, 郑云普 ( 2018). CO₂浓度对大豆叶片气孔特征和气体交换参数的影响. 作物学报, 44, 1212-1220.]
[21]	Li LX, Liu JM, Huang XL, Wang JC, Luo C, Liu JJ, Xiong X ( 2017). Response characteristic of Cinnamomum migaoseedling’s photosynthesis to CO₂ in different conditions of nitrogen . Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 48, 29-36.
	[ 李丽霞, 刘济明, 黄小龙, 王军才, 骆畅, 柳嘉佳, 熊雪 ( 2017). 不同氮素条件米槁幼苗光合作用对CO₂响应特征. 东北农业大学学报, 48, 29-36.]
[22]	Li YX, Lou YS, Zhang FC ( 2011). Comparison of stomatal conductance models for winter wheat. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 32, 106-110.
	[ 李永秀, 娄运生, 张富存 ( 2011). 冬小麦气孔导度模型的比较. 中国农业气象, 32, 106-110.]
[23]	Liu Y, Lei SG, Cheng LS, Cheng W, Bian ZF ( 2018). Effects of soil water content on stomatal conductance, transpiration, and photosynthetic rate of Caragana korshinskii under the influence of coal mining subsidence . Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38, 3069-3077.
	[ 刘英, 雷少刚, 程林森, 程伟, 卞正富 ( 2018). 采煤塌陷影响下土壤含水量变化对柠条气孔导度、蒸腾与光合作用速率的影响. 生态学报, 38, 3069-3077.]
[24]	Medlyn BE, Duursma RA, Eamus D, Ellsworth DS, Prentice IC, Barton CVM, Crous KY, Angelis PDE, Freeman M, Wingate L (2011). Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance. Global Change Biology, 17, 2134-2144. DOI URL
[25]	Miner GL, Bauerle WL (2017). Seasonal variability of the parameters of the Ball-Berry model of stomatal conductance in maize (Zea mays L.) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under well-watered and water-stressed conditions. Plant, Cell & Environment, 40, 1874-1886.
[26]	Ren B, Li J, Tong XJ, Mu YM, Meng P, Zhang JS ( 2018). Simulation on photosynthetic-CO₂ response of Quercus variabilis and Robinia pseudoacacia in the southern foot of the Taihang Mountain, China . Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 29, 1-10. DOI PMID
	[ 任博, 李俊, 同小娟, 母艳梅, 孟平, 张劲松 ( 2018). 太行山南麓栓皮栎和刺槐光合作用-CO₂响应模拟. 应用生态学报, 29, 1-10.] PMID
[27]	Su WH, Zhang GF ( 2002). The effect of soil and air temperature on photosynthesis and transpiration of Primula sinopurpurea . Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 22, 824-830.
	[ 苏文华, 张光飞 ( 2002). 土壤温度与气温对紫花雪山报春光合作用和蒸腾作用的影响. 西北植物学报, 22, 824-830.]
[28]	Tang XL, Cao YH, Zhou BZ, Zhou Y, Gu LH ( 2017). Comparison of light response modeling of photosynthesis in Castanopsis sclerophyllaleaves under different CO₂ concentrations . Chinese Journal of Ecology, 36, 2060-2067.
	[ 唐星林, 曹永慧, 周本智, 周燕, 顾连宏 ( 2017). 不同CO₂浓度下苦槠(Castanopsis sclerophylla)叶片光合光响应模型模拟比较. 生态学杂志, 36, 2060-2067.]
[29]	Tao FL, Hayashi Y, Zhang Z, Sakamoto T, Yokozawa M (2008). Global warming, rice production and water use in China: developing a probabilistic assessment. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 148, 94-110. DOI URL
[30]	Tuzet A, Perrier A, Leuning R (2003). A coupled model of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration. Plant, Cell & Environment, 26, 1097-1116.
[31]	Wang HZ, Han L, Xu YL, Niu JL ( 2015). Model analysis of the stomatal conductance response to light in Populus pruinosa at different temperatures in the Taklimakan desert . Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 24, 741-748.
	[ 王海珍, 韩路, 徐雅丽, 牛建龙 ( 2015). 不同温度下灰胡杨叶片气孔导度对光强响应的模型分析. 生态环境学报, 24, 741-748.]
[32]	Wang JL ( 2009). Response of photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance of oat to light intensity and CO₂ concentration and its modeling . Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 24, 134-137.
	[ 王建林 ( 2009). 燕麦叶片光合速率、气孔导度对光强和CO₂的响应与模拟. 华北农学报, 24, 134-137.]
[33]	Wang JL, Wen XF ( 2010). Modeling the response of stomatal conductance to variable CO₂ concentration and its physiological mechanism . Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30, 4815-4820.
	[ 王建林, 温学发 ( 2010). 气孔导度对CO₂浓度变化的模拟及其生理机制. 生态学报, 30, 4815-4820.]
[34]	Wang JL, Wen XF, Zhao FH, Fang QX, Yang XM ( 2012). Effects of doubled CO₂ concentration on leaf photosynthesis, transpiration and water use efficiency of eight crop species . Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 36, 438-446. DOI URL
	[ 王建林, 温学发, 赵风华, 房全孝, 杨新民 ( 2012). CO₂浓度倍增对8种作物叶片光合作用、蒸腾作用和水分利用效率的影响. 植物生态学报, 36, 438-446.]
[35]	Wang QL, Zhou GS ( 2018). Comparisons between common stomatal conductance models under progressive drought in spring maize. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38, 6846-6856.
	[ 王秋玲, 周广胜 ( 2018). 春玉米持续干旱过程中常用气孔导度模型的比较研究. 生态学报, 38, 6846-6856.]
[36]	Xing HL, Zhou WB, Hao WP, Li L, Wang C, Ma HY, Wang YS ( 2020). Inhibition of nitrogen increasing on maize growth under water stress. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 41, 240-252.
	[ 邢换丽, 周文彬, 郝卫平, 李丽, 王超, 马海洋, 王耀生 ( 2020). 水分胁迫下氮素增加对玉米生长的抑制作用. 中国农业气象, 41, 240-252.]
[37]	Ye ZP (2007). A new model for relationship between irradiance and the rate of photosynthesis in Oryza sativa. Photosynthetica, 45, 637-640. DOI URL
[38]	Ye ZP ( 2010). A review on modeling of responses of photosynthesis to light and CO₂ . Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 34, 727-740.
	[ 叶子飘 ( 2010). 光合作用对光和CO₂响应模型的研究进展. 植物生态学报, 34, 727-740.]
[39]	Ye ZP, Yu Q (2008). A coupled model of stomatal conductance and photosynthesis for winter wheat. Photosynthetica, 46, 637-640. DOI URL
[40]	Ye ZP, Yu Q ( 2009a). Mechanism model of stomatal conductance. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 33, 772-782.
	[ 叶子飘, 于强 ( 2009a). 植物气孔导度的机理模型. 植物生态学报, 33, 772-782.]
[41]	Ye ZP, Yu Q ( 2009b). A comparison of response curves of winter wheat photosynthesis to flag leaf intercellular and air CO₂ concentrations . Chinese Journal of Ecology, 28, 2233-2238.
	[ 叶子飘, 于强 ( 2009b). 光合作用对胞间和大气CO₂响应曲线的比较. 生态学杂志, 28, 2233-2238.]
[42]	Yu Q, Zhang YQ, Liu YF, Shi PL (2004). Simulation of the stomatal conductance of winter wheat in response to light, temperature and CO₂ changes. Annals of Botany, 93, 435-441. DOI URL
[43]	Zheng FY, Peng SL ( 2003). Responses of plant stomatal conductance to elevated CO₂ at different scales . Chinese Journal of Ecology, 22, 26-30.
	[ 郑凤英, 彭少麟 ( 2003). 不同尺度上植物叶气孔导度对升高CO₂的响应. 生态学杂志, 22, 26-30.]
[44]	Zhong C, Zhu Y ( 2013). Response of stomatal conductance to light in tobacco plants. Chinese Journal of Eco- Agriculture, 21, 966-972. DOI URL
	[ 钟楚, 朱勇 ( 2013). 烟草气孔导度对光强的响应. 中国生态农业学报, 21, 966-972.]

参数 Parameter	物种 Species
	大豆 Soybean			小麦 Wheat
	叶模型 Ye model	M-M模型 M-M model	观测值 Observed data	叶模型 Ye model	M-M模型 M-M model	观测值 Observed data
初始斜率 α	0.101 ± 0.019 ^b	0.128 ± 0.014 ^a	-	0.101 ± 0.001 ^b	0.132 ± 0.001 ^a	-
最大羧化速率A_nmax (mol·m^-2·s^-1)	48.61 ± 5.52 ^b	93.71 ± 17.67 ^a	49.00 ± 4.33 ^b	68.13 ± 1.62 ^b	127.03 ± 4.42 ^a	68.02 ± 1.45 ^b
饱和CO₂浓度C_i,TPU (μmol·mol^-1)	1 328.28 ± 79.07 ^a	-	1 332.72 ± 66.52 ^a	1 596.73 ± 31.88 ^a	-	1 599.46 ± 0.25 ^a
CO₂补偿点 Γ (μmol·mol^-1)	66.32 ± 4.04 ^a	66.02 ± 4.48 ^a	70.32 ± 2.33 ^a	63.82 ± 1.59 ^b	64.91 ± 1.26 ^a	65.18 ± 1.13 ^ab
光下呼吸速率R_p (μmol·m^-2·s^-1)	6.22 ± 0.62 ^b	7.58 ± 0.19 ^a	5.39 ± 0.32 ^b	6.29 ± 0.22 ^b	8.06 ± 0.15 ^a	6.22 ± 0.26 ^b
确定系数 R²	0.999 8	0.996 3	-	0.999 9	0.995 3	-

参数 Parameter	物种 Species
	大豆 Soybean			小麦 Wheat
	叶模型 Ye model	M-M模型 M-M model	观测值 Observed data	叶模型 Ye model	M-M模型 M-M model	观测值 Observed data
初始斜率 α	0.101 ± 0.019 ^b	0.128 ± 0.014 ^a	-	0.101 ± 0.001 ^b	0.132 ± 0.001 ^a	-
最大羧化速率A_nmax (mol·m^-2·s^-1)	48.61 ± 5.52 ^b	93.71 ± 17.67 ^a	49.00 ± 4.33 ^b	68.13 ± 1.62 ^b	127.03 ± 4.42 ^a	68.02 ± 1.45 ^b
饱和CO₂浓度C_i,TPU (μmol·mol^-1)	1 328.28 ± 79.07 ^a	-	1 332.72 ± 66.52 ^a	1 596.73 ± 31.88 ^a	-	1 599.46 ± 0.25 ^a
CO₂补偿点 Γ (μmol·mol^-1)	66.32 ± 4.04 ^a	66.02 ± 4.48 ^a	70.32 ± 2.33 ^a	63.82 ± 1.59 ^b	64.91 ± 1.26 ^a	65.18 ± 1.13 ^ab
光下呼吸速率R_p (μmol·m^-2·s^-1)	6.22 ± 0.62 ^b	7.58 ± 0.19 ^a	5.39 ± 0.32 ^b	6.29 ± 0.22 ^b	8.06 ± 0.15 ^a	6.22 ± 0.26 ^b
确定系数 R²	0.999 8	0.996 3	-	0.999 9	0.995 3	-

参数 Parameter	物种 Species
	大豆 Soybean			小麦 Wheat
	新模型 New model	经验模型 Empirical model	观测值 Observed data	新模型 New model	经验模型 Empirical model	观测值 Observed data
初始斜率 α_i	(1.42 ± 0.68) × 10 ^-3	-	-	(7.22 ± 1.43) × 10 ^-4	-	-
系数 β_i(mol·mol^-1)	(6.14 ± 0.33) × 10 ^-4	-	-	(2.34 ± 0.73) × 10 ^-4	-	-
系数 γ_i (mol·mol^-1)	(7.02 ± 0.68) × 10 ^-4	-	-	(2.08 ± 0.35) × 10 ^-3	-	-
最大气孔导度 g_s-max (mol·m^-2·s^-1)	0.686 ± 0.154 ^a	0.615 ± 0.161 ^a	0.666 ± 0.151 ^a	0.481 ± 0.023 ^a	0.438 ± 0.013 ^a	0.471 ± 0.023 ^a
常数 C_s0(mol·mol^-1)	-	6 725.12 ± 3 765.30	-	-	2 781.66 ± 792.63	-
最小气孔导度 g_s-min (mol·m^-2·s^-1)	0.271 ± 0.062 ^a	-	0.279 ± 0.066 ^a	0.297 ± 0.018 ^a	-	0.293 ± 0.020 ^a
CO₂浓度 C_s-min (μmol·mol^-1)	741.45 ± 143.22 ^a	-	732.78 ± 133.14 ^a	1 112.43 ± 149.31 ^a	-	1 200.34 ± 200.38 ^a
确定系数 R²	0.995 1	0.727 3	-	0.994 1	0.984 2	-

参数 Parameter	物种 Species
	大豆 Soybean			小麦 Wheat
	新模型 New model	经验模型 Empirical model	观测值 Observed data	新模型 New model	经验模型 Empirical model	观测值 Observed data
初始斜率 α_i	(1.42 ± 0.68) × 10 ^-3	-	-	(7.22 ± 1.43) × 10 ^-4	-	-
系数 β_i(mol·mol^-1)	(6.14 ± 0.33) × 10 ^-4	-	-	(2.34 ± 0.73) × 10 ^-4	-	-
系数 γ_i (mol·mol^-1)	(7.02 ± 0.68) × 10 ^-4	-	-	(2.08 ± 0.35) × 10 ^-3	-	-
最大气孔导度 g_s-max (mol·m^-2·s^-1)	0.686 ± 0.154 ^a	0.615 ± 0.161 ^a	0.666 ± 0.151 ^a	0.481 ± 0.023 ^a	0.438 ± 0.013 ^a	0.471 ± 0.023 ^a
常数 C_s0(mol·mol^-1)	-	6 725.12 ± 3 765.30	-	-	2 781.66 ± 792.63	-
最小气孔导度 g_s-min (mol·m^-2·s^-1)	0.271 ± 0.062 ^a	-	0.279 ± 0.066 ^a	0.297 ± 0.018 ^a	-	0.293 ± 0.020 ^a
CO₂浓度 C_s-min (μmol·mol^-1)	741.45 ± 143.22 ^a	-	732.78 ± 133.14 ^a	1 112.43 ± 149.31 ^a	-	1 200.34 ± 200.38 ^a
确定系数 R²	0.995 1	0.727 3	-	0.994 1	0.984 2	-

植物气孔导度对CO₂响应模型的构建

Investigation on CO₂-response model of stomatal conductance for plants

全文

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 44

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李伟斌, 张红霞, 张玉书, 陈妮娜. 昼夜不对称增温对长白山阔叶红松林碳汇能力的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(9): 1225-1233.
[2]	蒋海港, 曾云鸿, 唐华欣, 刘伟, 李杰林, 何国华, 秦海燕, 王丽超, 姚银安. 三种藓类植物固碳耗水节律调节作用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(7): 988-997.
[3]	王嘉仪, 王襄平, 徐程扬, 夏新莉, 谢宗强, 冯飞, 樊大勇. 北京市行道树绒毛梣的水力结构对城市不透水表面比例的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(7): 998-1009.
[4]	刘海燕, 臧纱纱, 张春霞, 左进城, 阮祚禧, 吴红艳. 磷饥饿下硅藻光系统II光化学反应及其对高光强的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(12): 1718-1727.
[5]	马艳泽, 杨熙来, 徐彦森, 冯兆忠. 四种常见树木叶片光合模型关键参数对臭氧浓度升高的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(3): 321-329.
[6]	郑周涛, 张扬建. 1982-2018年青藏高原水分利用效率变化及归因分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(12): 1486-1496.
[7]	王晶苑, 魏杰, 温学发. 土壤CO₂通量梯度观测技术和方法的理论、假设与应用进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(12): 1523-1536.
[8]	吴霖升, 张永光, 章钊颖, 张小康, 吴云飞. 日光诱导叶绿素荧光遥感及其在陆地生态系统监测中的应用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(10): 1167-1199.
[9]	靳川, 李鑫豪, 蒋燕, 徐铭泽, 田赟, 刘鹏, 贾昕, 查天山. 黑沙蒿光合能量分配组分在生长季的相对变化与调控机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(8): 870-879.
[10]	武洪敏, 双升普, 张金燕, 寸竹, 孟珍贵, 李龙根, 沙本才, 陈军文. 短期生长环境光强骤增导致典型阴生植物三七光系统受损的机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(4): 404-419.
[11]	陈胜楠, 陈左司南, 张志强. 北京山区油松和元宝槭冠层气孔导度特征及其环境响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(12): 1329-1340.
[12]	李景, 王欣, 王振华, 王斌, 王成章, 邓美凤, 刘玲莉. 臭氧和气溶胶复合污染对杨树叶片光合作用的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(8): 854-863.
[13]	冯兆忠, 李品, 张国友, 李征珍, 平琴, 彭金龙, 刘硕. 二氧化碳浓度升高对陆地生态系统的影响: 问题与展望[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(5): 461-474.
[14]	牛书丽, 陈卫楠. 全球变化与生态系统研究现状与展望[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(5): 449-460.
[15]	李旭, 吴婷, 程严, 谭钠丹, 蒋芬, 刘世忠, 褚国伟, 孟泽, 刘菊秀. 南亚热带常绿阔叶林4个树种对增温的生理生态适应能力比较[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(12): 1203-1214.