小兴安岭三种槭树叶性状随植株大小和林冠条件的变异

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2023.0369

植物生态学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (6): 730-743.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2023.0369 cstr: 32100.14.cjpe.2023.0369

所属专题：植物功能性状

小兴安岭三种槭树叶性状随植株大小和林冠条件的变异

彭仲韬, 金光泽, 刘志理^*()

东北林业大学生态研究中心, 森林生态系统可持续经营教育部重点实验室, 东北亚生物多样性研究中心, 哈尔滨 150040

收稿日期:2023-11-28 接受日期:2024-02-27 出版日期:2024-06-20 发布日期:2024-02-27
通讯作者: *刘志理(liuzl2093@126.com)
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2022YFD2201100);国家自然科学基金(32071533);中央高校基本科研业务费(2572022DS13)

Leaf trait variations and relationships of three Acer species in different tree sizes and canopy conditions in Xiao Hinggan Mountains of Northeast China

PENG Zhong-Tao, JIN Guang-Ze, LIU Zhi-Li^*()

Center for Ecological Research, Key Laboratory of Sustainable Forest Ecosystem Management of the Ministry of Education, Northeast Asia Biodiversity Research Center, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China

Received:2023-11-28 Accepted:2024-02-27 Online:2024-06-20 Published:2024-02-27
Contact: *LIU Zhi-Li(liuzl2093@126.com)
Supported by:
National Key R&D Program of China(2022YFD2201100);National Natural Science Foundation of China(32071533);Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(2572022DS13)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

叶性状受植株大小的影响, 但也会因成年树和幼树所处林冠条件的不同而产生差异。因此植物可通过调整叶性状进而选择不同的生存策略。该研究测量了小兴安岭阔叶红松(Pinus korainesis)林中花楷槭(Acer ukurunduense)、青楷槭(A. tegmentosum)、五角槭(A. pictum subsp. mono) 3种槭树的林隙成年树、林隙幼树和林内幼树的叶经济谱性状: 比叶面积(SLA)、叶干物质含量(LDMC)、叶片厚度(LT)、叶绿素(Chl)含量、净光合速率(A_area)和非结构性碳水化合物(NSC)含量及防御性状: 总酚(TP)含量和类黄酮(FLA)含量, 通过研究植株大小和林冠条件对叶性状变异及相关性的影响, 阐述林隙如何通过影响叶性状进而影响林分更新以及不同生境下植株所选生存策略的差异。结果表明: 林隙成年树的LDMC、Chl含量、FLA含量和NSC含量显著高于林隙幼树, SLA则显著低于林隙幼树; 而林隙幼树的LDMC、LT、Chl含量和A_area均显著高于林内幼树; 成年树SLA和LDMC相关性斜率的绝对值显著大于林隙幼树, 林内幼树两者间的斜率的绝对值又显著小于林隙幼树。林隙成年树表现为“保守型”策略, 林内幼树表现为“获取型”策略; 林隙幼树则表现为两种策略之间的过渡策略。研究结果表明, 当幼树不再受到林内环境光照条件限制时, 植株大小对叶性状的影响可能发生改变。另外, 林隙可以通过提高幼树光合速率, 提高对病虫害的抵抗能力等方式促进林分更新。

关键词: 叶性状, 防御性状, 非结构性碳水化合物, 林冠条件

Abstract:

Aims Leaf traits are affected not only by plant sizes, but also by different canopy conditions where mature trees and saplings grow. Thus, these trees choose various survival strategies to adapt to different canopy conditions by adjusting their leaf traits. The aim of this study is to investigate the changes of leaf traits of three Acer trees along with the changes of plant size and canopy condition.

Methods In this study, three species (Acer ukurunduense, A. tegmentosumand A. pictumsubsp. mono) in broadleaf Pinus korainesis forest in Xiao Hinggan Mountains of Northeast China were selected. Six leaf economics spectrum traits, specific leaf area (SLA), leaf dry matter content (LDMC), leaf thickness (LT), chlorophyll (Chl) content, net photosynthetic rate per area (A_area) and non-structural carbohydrates (NSC) content, together with two defensive traits, total phenolics (TP) content and flavonoids (FLA) content of adult trees and saplings in gaps and saplings in understory were measured. Whether leaf traits and their relationships varied with plant sizes and canopy conditions was further analyzed to illustrate how gaps influence forest regeneration by altering leaf traits, and to explore the differentiation of survival strategies for plant individuals growing under various habitats.

Important findings Adults in gaps had higher LDMC, Chl content, FLA content and NSC content compared with saplings in gaps, which meant adults had adequate photosynthetic accumulation and they were more capable to defend against herbivory. LDMC, LT, Chl content and A_area of gap saplings were significantly higher than saplings in understory, indicating that canopy condition was a vital source of leaf trait variations. The absolute slope of relationship between SLA and LDMC for adults was significantly higher than that for saplings in gaps, but the absolute slope of understory saplings was significantly lower than that of the gap saplings. The relationship between defensive traits remained stable among different plant sizes and canopy conditions. These evidences showed that, adults invested more in leaf construction such as leaf thickness and defensive substances, so they chose “conservative” strategy. Saplings in understory improved their ability to acquire light by increasing SLA, they therefore tended to choose “acquisitive” strategy. Saplings in gaps however, showed the transition strategy between “conservative” and “acquisitive” strategies. Results further indicated that, when saplings were not limited by light, their photosynthetic rate increased rapidly to be significantly higher than that of adults. In addition, forest gaps can promote the regeneration of forest stand by enhancing the abilities of photosynthesis and resistance to herbivory of saplings.

Key words: leaf traits, defensive traits, non-structural carbohydrates, canopy condition

彭仲韬, 金光泽, 刘志理. 小兴安岭三种槭树叶性状随植株大小和林冠条件的变异. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(6): 730-743. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2023.0369

PENG Zhong-Tao, JIN Guang-Ze, LIU Zhi-Li. Leaf trait variations and relationships of three Acer species in different tree sizes and canopy conditions in Xiao Hinggan Mountains of Northeast China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2024, 48(6): 730-743. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2023.0369

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2023.0369

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2024/V48/I6/730

图/表 6

表1 小兴安岭3种槭树胸径(DBH)、树高(H)和环境因子在不同林冠条件和大小植株之间的差异(平均值±标准误)

Table 1 Differences in diameter at breast height (DBH), tree height (H) and environmental factors among different canopy conditions and plant sizes of three Acer species in Xiao Hinggan Mountains (mean ± SE)

因子 Factor	林隙成年树 Adults in gaps	林隙幼树 Saplings in gaps	林内幼树 Saplings in understory
DBH (cm)	17.31 ± 1.46^a	5.15 ± 0.23^b	5.20 ± 0.17^b
H (m)	15.02 ± 1.23^a	7.23 ± 1.16^b	7.34 ± 0.92^b
CO (%)	24.63 ± 1.30^a	23.49 ± 1.15^a	15.15 ± 0.79^b
SWC	0.90 ± 0.10^a	1.00 ± 0.09^a	0.77 ± 0.06^a
STN (mg·g^-1)	12.11 ± 1.04^a	12.25 ± 0.97^a	10.53 ± 0.96^a
STP (mg·g^-1)	1.28 ± 0.11^a	1.30 ± 0.09^a	1.07 ± 0.08^a
pH	5.69 ± 0.12^a	5.49 ± 0.10^a	5.59 ± 0.12^a

图1 小兴安岭3种槭树不同植株大小和林冠条件之间叶性状的差异。 *, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001; ns, p ≥ 0.05。Aarea, 净光合速率; Chl, 叶绿素; FLA, 类黄酮; LDMC, 叶干物质含量; LT, 叶片厚度; NSC, 非结构性碳水化合物; SLA, 比叶面积; SS, 可溶性糖; ST, 淀粉; TP, 总酚。

Fig. 1 Leaf traits variations for three Acer species among different tree sizes and canopy conditions in Xiao Hinggan Mountains. *, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001; ns, p ≥ 0.05. Aarea, net photosynthetic rate per area; Chl, chlorophyll; FLA, flavonoids; LDMC, leaf dry matter content; LT, leaf thickness; NSC, non-structural carbohydrates; SLA, specific leaf area; SS, soluble sugar; ST, starch; TP, total phenolics.

图2 小兴安岭3种槭树叶性状间Pearson相关系数。 *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001。Aarea, 净光合速率; Chl, 叶绿素含量; FLA, 类黄酮含量; LDMC, 叶干物质含量; LT, 叶片厚度; NSC, 非结构性碳水化合物含量; SLA, 比叶面积; TP, 总酚含量。

Fig. 2 Correlations coefficients between leaf traits of three Acer species in Xiao Hinggan Mountains. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001. Aarea, net photosynthetic rate per area; Chl, chlorophyll content; FLA, flavonoids content; LDMC, leaf dry matter content; LT, leaf thickness; NSC, non-structural carbohydrates content; SLA, specific leaf area; TP, total phenolics content.

图3 小兴安岭3种槭树叶性状间相关关系随植株大小的变化。实线表示叶性状间的相关关系显著(p < 0.05), 虚线表示性状间的相关关系不显著(p ≥ 0.05)。*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001。p1 < 0.05代表叶性状间相关性的斜率随植株大小而显著变化, p1 ≥ 0.05代表叶性状间相关性的斜率差异不显著; p2 < 0.05则表示截距存在显著差异, p2 ≥ 0.05表示截距不存在显著差异。Aarea, 净光合速率; Chl, 叶绿素含量; FLA, 类黄酮含量; LDMC, 叶干物质含量; LT, 叶片厚度; NSC, 非结构性碳水化合物含量; SLA, 比叶面积; TP, 总酚含量。

Fig. 3 Variations for trait-trait relationships between different sizes of three Acer species in Xiao Hinggan Mountains. The significant regression relationships between leaf traits were shown as solid lines (p < 0.05), and the regression line was represented by a dashed line if the relationships weren’t significant (p ≥ 0.05). *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001. p1 < 0.05 indicated that the slope of relationship between leaf traits varied significantly with plant sizes; p1 ≥ 0.05 indicated that the slope of relationship between leaf traits didn’t vary significantly with plant sizes; p2 < 0.05 indicated a significant difference in intercept; p2 ≥ 0.05 indicated no significant difference in intercept. Aarea, net photosynthetic rate per area; Chl, chlorophyll content; FLA, flavonoids content; LDMC, leaf dry matter content; LT, leaf thickness; NSC, non-structural carbohydrates content; SLA, specific leaf area; TP, total phenolics content.

图4 小兴安岭3种槭树叶性状间相关关系随林冠条件的变异。实线表示叶性状间的相关关系显著(p < 0.05), 虚线表示性状间的相关关系不显著(p ≥ 0.05)。*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001。p1 < 0.05代表叶性状间相关性的斜率随林冠条件而显著变化, p1 ≥ 0.05代表叶性状间相关性的斜率差异不显著; p2 < 0.05则表示截距存在显著差异, p2 ≥ 0.05表示截距不存在显著差异。Aarea, 净光合速率; Chl, 叶绿素含量; FLA, 类黄酮含量; LDMC, 叶干物质含量; LT, 叶片厚度; NSC, 非结构性碳水化合物含量; SLA, 比叶面积; TP, 总酚含量。

Fig. 4 Variations for trait-trait relationships between different canopy conditions of three Acer species in Xiao Hinggan Mountains. The significant regression relationships between leaf traits were shown as solid lines (p < 0.05), and the regression line was represented by a dashed line if the relationships weren’t significant (p ≥ 0.05). *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001. p1 < 0.05 indicated that the slope of relationship between leaf traits varied significantly with canopy conditions; p1 ≥ 0.05 indicated that the slope of relationship between leaf traits didn’t vary significantly with canopy conditions; p2 < 0.05 indicated a significant difference in intercept; p2 ≥ 0.05 indicated no significant difference in intercept. Aarea, net photosynthetic rate per area; Chl, chlorophyll content; FLA, flavonoids content; LDMC, leaf dry matter content; LT, leaf thickness; NSC, non-structural carbohydrates content; SLA, specific leaf area; TP, total phenolics content.

图5 小兴安岭3种槭树在不同大小植株以及不同林冠条件下的主成分分析(PCA)。 Aarea, 净光合速率; Chl, 叶绿素含量; FLA, 类黄酮含量; LDMC, 叶干物质含量; LT, 叶片厚度; NSC, 非结构性碳水化合物含量; SLA, 比叶面积; TP, 总酚含量。

Fig. 5 Principal component analysis (PCA) for leaf traits and defensive traits among different plant sizes and canopy conditions of three Acer species in Xiao Hinggan Mountains. Aarea, net photosynthetic rate per area; Chl, chlorophyll content; FLA, flavonoids content; LDMC, leaf dry matter content; LT, leaf thickness; NSC, non-structural carbohydrates content; SLA, specific leaf area; TP, total phenolics content.

参考文献 74

[1]	Abdala-Roberts L, Galman A, Petry WK, Covelo F, de la Fuente M, Glauser G, Moreia X (2018). Interspecific variation in leaf functional and defensive traits in oak species and its underlying climatic drivers. PLoS ONE, 13, e0202548. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202548.
[2]	Bebre I, Marques I, Annighoefer P (2022). Biomass allocation and leaf morphology of saplings grown under various conditions of light availability and competition types. Plant-Basel, 11, 305. DOI: 10.3390/plants11030305.
[3]	Bin Y, Li Y, Russo SE, Cao H, Ni Y, Ye W, Lian J (2022). Leaf trait expression varies with tree size and ecological strategy in a subtropical forest. Functional Ecology, 36, 1010-1022.
[4]	Buajan S, Liu J, He Z, Feng X, Muhammad A (2017). The effect of light on micro-environment and specific leaf area within the gap, subtropical forest, China. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 49, 273-282.
[5]	Chang YN, Xu CB, Yang H, Zhou JX, Hua WP, Zhang SH, Zhong QL, Li BY (2021). Leaf structural traits vary with plant size in even-aged stands of Sapindus mukorossi. Frontier in Plant Science, 12, 692484. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.692484.
[6]	Chauvin KM, Asner GP, Martin RE, Kress WJ, Wright SJ, Field CB (2018). Decoupled dimensions of leaf economic and anti-herbivore defense strategies in a tropical canopy tree community. Oecologia, 186, 765-782. DOI PMID
[7]	Chen ZC, Liu C, Liu XJ, Wan XC (2017). Effects of irradiation and tree size on the carbon-water balances of Quercus aliena var. acuteserrata. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 53(9), 18-25.
	[陈志成, 刘畅, 刘晓静, 万贤崇 (2017). 光强和树体大小对锐齿栎树木水、碳平衡的影响. 林业科学, 53(9), 18-25.]
[8]	Cheng SQ, Jiang F, Jin GZ (2022). Leaf economics spectrum of broadleaved seedlings and its relationship with defense traits in a temperate forest. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 46, 678-686.
	[程思祺, 姜峰, 金光泽 (2022). 温带森林阔叶植物幼苗叶经济谱及其与防御性状的关系. 植物生态学报, 46, 678-686.] DOI
[9]	da Silva DC, Guimaraes ZTM, dos Santos VAHF, Grandis A, Palacios CE, Ferreira MJ (2020). Herbivory and leaf traits of Amazonian tree species as affected by irradiance. Plant Biology, 23, 229-240.
[10]	de Vries J, Evers JB, Poelman EH (2017). Dynamic plant- plant-herbivore interactions govern plant growth-defence integration. Trends in Plant Science, 22, 329-337.
[11]	Devagiri GM, Khaple AK, Mohan S, Venkateshamurthy P, Tomar S, Arunkumar AN, Joshi J (2016). Species diversity, regeneration and dominance as influenced by canopy gaps and their characteristics in tropical evergreen forests of Western Ghats, India. Journal of Forestry Research, 27, 799-810.
[12]	Du JH, Shao JY, Li SF, Qin J (2020). Non-structural carbonhydrate content of trees and its influencing factors at multiple spatial-temporal scales: a review. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 31, 1378-1388.
	[杜建会, 邵佳怡, 李升发, 秦晶 (2020). 树木非结构性碳水化合物含量多时空尺度变化特征及其影响因素研究进展. 应用生态学报, 31, 1378-1388.] DOI
[13]	Du Y, Liu RL, Xia JY (2020). Impacts of global environmental change drivers on non-structural carbohydrates in terrestrial plants. Functional Ecology, 34, 1525-1536.
[14]	Ellsworth DS, Reich PB (1992). Leaf mass per area, nitrogen content and photosynthetic carbon gain in Acer saccharum seedlings in contrasting forest light environments. Functional Ecology, 6, 423-435.
[15]	Funk JR, Larson JE, Vose G (2021). Leaf traits and performance vary with plant age and water availability in Artemisia californica. Annals of Botany, 127, 495-503.
[16]	Furze ME, Wainwright DK, Huggett BA, Knipfer T, McElrone AJ, Broderson CR (2021). Ecologically driven selection of nonstructural carbohydrate storage in oak trees. New Phytologist, 232, 567-578. DOI PMID
[17]	Goodger JQD, Gleadow RM (2006). Growth cost and ontogenetic expression patterns of defence in cyanogenic Eucalyptus spp. Trees, 20, 757-765.
[18]	Granata MU, Bracco F, Nola P, Catoni R (2020). Photosynthetic characteristic and leaf traits variations along a natural light gradient in Acer campestre and Crataegus monogyna. Flora, 268, 151626. DOI: 10.1016/j.flora.2020.151626.
[19]	Grassi G, Baganresi U (2001). Foliar morphological and physiological plasticity in Picea abies and Abies alba saplings along a natural light gradient. Tree Physiology, 21, 959-967. DOI PMID
[20]	Griffith DM, Quigley KM, Anderson TM (2016). Leaf thickness controls variation in leaf mass per area (LMA) among grazing-adapted grasses in Serengeti. Oecologia, 181, 1035-1040. DOI PMID
[21]	He D, Yan ER (2018). Size-dependent variations in individual traits and trait scaling relationships within a shade-tolerant evergreen treespecies. American Journal of Botany, 105, 1165-1174.
[22]	Hérault B, Bachelot B, Poorter L, Rossi V, Bongers F, Chave J, Paine CET, Wagner F, Baraloto C (2011). Functional traits shape ontogenetic growth trajectories of rain forest tree species. Journal of Ecology, 99, 1431-1440.
[23]	Hirano I, Iida H, Ito Y, Park HD, Takahashi K (2019). Effects of light conditions on growth and defense compound contents of Datura inoxia and D. stramonium. Journal of Plant Research, 132, 473-480.
[24]	Houter NC, Pons TL (2014). Gap effects on leaf traits of tropical rainforest trees differing in juvenile light requirement. Oecologia, 175, 37-50. DOI PMID
[25]	Huang J, Wang XM, Zheng MH, Mo JM (2021). 13-year nitrogen addition increases nonstructural carbon pools in subtropical forest trees in southern China. Forest Ecology and Management, 481, 118748. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118748.
[26]	Jiang F, Cadotte MW, Jin G (2021). Individual-level leaf trait variation and correlation across biological and spatial scales. Ecology and Evolution, 11, 5344-5354. DOI PMID
[27]	Karavin N (2014). Effects of leaf and plant age on specific leaf area in deciduous tree species Quercus Cerris L. var. cerris. Bangladesh Journal of Botany, 42, 301-306.
[28]	Katahata SI, Naramoto M, Kakubari Y, Mukai Y (2007). Photosynthetic capacity and nitrogen partitioning in foliage of the evergreen shrub Daphniphyllum humile along a natural light gradient. Tree Physiology, 27, 199-208.
[29]	Keram A, Halik Ü, Keyimu M, Aishan T, Mamat Z, Rouzi A (2019). Gap dynamics of natural Populus euphratica floodplain forests affected by hydrological alteration along the Tarim River: implications for restoration of the riparian forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 438, 103-113.
[30]	Klipel J, Bergamin RS, Seger GDD, Carlucci MB, Müller SC (2021). Plant functional traits explain species abundance patterns and strategies shifts among saplings and adult trees in Araucaria forests. Austral Ecology, 46, 1084-1096.
[31]	Li RH, Zhu SD, Lian JY, Zhang H, Liu H, Ye WH, Ye Q (2021a). Functional traits are good predictors of tree species abundance across 101 subtropical forest species in China. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 541577. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.541577.
[32]	Li SJ, Wang H, Gou W, White JF, Kingsley KL, Wu GQ, Su PX (2021b). Leaf functional traits of dominant desert plants in the Hexi Corridor, Northwestern China: trade-off relationships and adversity strategies. Global Ecology and Conservation, 28, e01666. DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01666.
[33]	Lin SM, Galloway LF (2010). Environmental context determines within- and potential between-generation consequences of herbivory. Oecologia, 163, 911-920. DOI PMID
[34]	Liu FD, Yang WJ, Wang ZS, Xu Z, Liu H, Zhang M, Liu YH, An SQ, Sun SC (2010). Plant size effects on the relationships among specific leaf area, leaf nutrient content, and photosynthetic capacity in tropical woody species. Acta Oecologica, 36, 149-159.
[35]	Liu JF, Kang FF, Yu AH, Yang WJ, Cang EM, Jiang ZP (2018). Responses of foliar carbohydrates and nutrient status of two distinctive cypress species to shading and nitrogen addition. Global Ecology and Conservation, 16, e00452. DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00452.
[36]	Liu SC, Wang JH, Duan WB, Chen LX, Wang LX, Du S, Zhao JH (2013). Gap characteristics in the mixed broadleaf Korean pine forest in Xiaoxing’an Mountains. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33, 5234-5244.
	[刘少冲, 王敬华, 段文标, 陈立新, 王丽霞, 杜珊, 赵健慧 (2013). 小兴安岭阔叶红松混交林林隙特征. 生态学报, 33, 5234-5244.]
[37]	Liu Z, Hikosaka K, Li F (2020). Variations in leaf economics spectrum traits for an evergreen coniferous species: tree size dominates over environment factors. Functional Ecology, 34, 458-467.
[38]	Liu ZL, Jiang F, Li FR, Jin GZ (2019). Coordination of intra and inter-species leaf traits according to leaf phenology and plant age for three temperate broadleaf species with different shade tolerances. Forest Ecology and Management, 434, 63-75.
[39]	Lu DL, Zhu JJ, Wang XY, Hao GY, Wang GG (2021). A systematic evaluation of gap size and within-gap position effects on seedling regeneration in a temperate secondary forest, Northeast China. Forest Ecology and Management, 490, 119140. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119140.
[40]	Luo T, Yu FY, Lian JY, Wang JJ, Shen J, Wu ZF, Ye WH (2022). Impact of canopy vertical height on leaf functional traits in a lower subtropical evergreen broadleaf forest of Dinghushan. Biodiversity Science, 30, 21414. DOI: 10.17520/bidos.2021414.
	[罗恬, 俞方圆, 练琚愉, 王俊杰, 申健, 吴志峰, 叶万辉 (2022). 冠层垂直高度对植物叶片功能性状的影响: 以鼎湖山南亚热带常绿阔叶林为例. 生物多样性, 30, 21414. DOI: 10.17520/bidos.2021414.]
[41]	Makkar HPS, Blümmel M, Borowy NK, Becker K (1993). Gravimetric determination of tannins and their correlations with chemical and protein precipitation methods. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 61, 161-165.
[42]	Marenco RA, Antezana-Vera SA, Nascimento HCS (2009). Relationship between specific leaf area, leaf thickness, leaf water content and SPAD-502 readings in six Amazonian tree species. Photosynthetica, 47, 184-190.
[43]	Martin AR, Thomas SC (2013). Size-dependent changes in leaf and wood chemical traits in two Caribbean rainforest trees. Tree Physiology, 33, 1338-1353. DOI PMID
[44]	Miura M, Yamamoto SI (2003). Effects of sprouting and canopy states on the structure and dynamics of a Castanopsis cuspidata var. sieboldii sapling population in an old-growth evergreen broadleaf forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 183, 387-400.
[45]	Moreira X, Pearse IS (2017). Leaf habit does not determine the investment in both physical and chemical defences and pair-wise correlations between these defensive traits. Plant Biology, 19, 354-359. DOI PMID
[46]	Nakamura M, Hina T, Nabeshima E, Hiura T (2008). Do spatial variation in leaf traits and herbivory within a canopy respond to selective cutting and fertilization? Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 38, 1603-1610.
[47]	Nielesen SS (2010). Phenol-Sulfuric acid method for total carbohydrates//Nielesen SS. Food Analysis Laboratory Manual. Springer, Boston, USA. 47-53.
[48]	Oktavia DN, Jin GZ (2020). Variations in leaf morphological and chemical traits in response to life stages, plant functional types, and habitat types in an old-growth temperate forest. Basic and Applied Ecology, 49, 22-33.
[49]	Osnas JLD, Lichstein JW, Reich PB, Pacala SW (2013). Global leaf trait relationships: mass, area, and the leaf economics spectrum. Science, 340, 741-744. DOI PMID
[50]	Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Díaz S, Garnier E, Lavorel S, Poorter H, Jaureguiberry P, Bret-Harte MS, Cornwell WK, Craine JM, Gurvich DE, Urcelay C, Veneklaas EJ, Reich PB, Poorter L, Wright IJ, et al. (2016). New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany, 64, 715-716.
[51]	Piper FI, Altmann SH, Lusk CH (2018). Global patterns of insect herbivory in gap and understorey environments, and their implications for woody plant carbon storage. Oikos, 127, 483-496.
[52]	Puglielli G, Varone L, Gratani L, Catoni R (2017). Specific leaf area variations drive acclimation of Cistus salvifolius in different light environments. Photosynthetica, 55, 31-40.
[53]	Qiu J, Han AX, He CM, Dai XX, Jia SH, Luo Y, Hao ZQ, Yin QL (2022). Functional Traits of Quercus aliena var. acuteserrata in Qinling Huangguan forest dynamics plot: the relative importance of plant size and habitat. Forests, 13, 899. DOI: 10.3390/f13060899.
[54]	Rijkers T, Pons TL, Bongers F (2000). The effect of tree height and light availability on photosynthetic leaf traits of four neotropical species differing in shade tolerance. Functional Ecology, 14, 77-86.
[55]	Rozendaal DMA, Hurtado VH, Poorter L (2006). Plasticity in leaf traits of 38 tropical tree species in response to light; relationships with light demand and adult stature. Functional Ecology, 20, 207-216.
[56]	Ryan MG, Yoder BJ (1997). Hydraulic limits to tree height and tree growth. Bioscience, 47, 235-242.
[57]	Schliemann SA, Bockheim JG (2014). Influence of gap size on carbon and nitrogen biogeochemical cycling in Northern hardwood forests of the Upper Peninsula, Michigan. Plant and Soil, 377, 323-335.
[58]	Smith EA, Collette SB, Boynton TA, Lillrose T, Stevens MR, Bekker MF, Eggett D, St Clair SB (2011). Developmental contributions to phenotypic variation in functional leaf traits within quaking aspen clones. Tree Physiology, 31, 68-77. DOI PMID
[59]	Spasojevic MJ, Yablon EA, Oberle B, Myers JA (2014). Ontogenetic trait variation influences tree community assembly across environmental gradients. Ecosphere, 5, 129. DOI: 10.1890/ES14-000159.1.
[60]	Takafumi H, Kawase S, Nakamura M, Hiura T (2010). Herbivory in canopy gaps created by a typhoon varies by understory plant leaf phenology. Ecological Entomology, 35, 576-585.
[61]	Tian JX, Wei LP, He NP, Xu L, Chen Z, Hou JH (2018). Vertical variation of leaf functional traits in temperate forest canopies in China. Acta Ecological Sinica, 38, 8383-8391.
	[田俊霞, 魏丽萍, 何念鹏, 徐丽, 陈智, 侯继华 (2018). 温带针阔混交林叶片性状随树冠垂直高度的变化规律. 生态学报, 38, 8383-8391.]
[62]	Veneklaas EJ, den Ouden F (2005). Dynamics of non-structural carbohydrates in two Ficus species after transfer to deep shade. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 54, 148-154.
[63]	Villagra M, Trentini CP, di Francescantonio D, Eleuterio AA, Foletto F, Montti LF, Campanello PI (2021). Disturbance as a driver of trait assembly in liana communities in a semi-deciduous Atlantic forest. Plant Ecology, 222, 773-790.
[64]	Wang KB, Jin GZ, Liu ZL (2023). Dynamic variation of non-structural carbohydrates in branches and leaves of temperate broadleaf tree species over a complete life history. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 6, 1130604. DOI: 10.3389/ffgc.2023.1130604.
[65]	Wang XL, Liu JF, He ZS, Xing C, Zhu J, Gu XG, Lan YQ, Wu ZY, Liao PC, Zhu DH (2021). Forest gaps mediate the structure and function of the soil microbial community in a Castanopsis kawakamii forest. Ecological Indicators, 122, 107288. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107288.
[66]	Wang Z, Huang H, Wang H, Peñuelas J, Sardans J, Niinemets Ü, Niklas KJ, Li Y, Xie J, Wright IJ (2022). Leaf water content contributes to global leaf trait relationships. Nature Communciations, 13, 5525. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-32784-1.
[67]	Wiley E, Rogers BJ, Hodgkinson R, Landhäusser SM (2016). Nonstructural carbohydrate dynamics of lodgepole pine dying from mountain pine beetle attack. New Phytologist, 209, 550-562. DOI PMID
[68]	Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin T, Cornelissen JHC, Diemer M, Flexas J, Garnier E, Groom PK, Gulias J, Hikosaka K, et al. (2004). The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature, 428, 821-827.
[69]	Xie HT, Yu MK, Cheng XR (2018). Leaf non-structural carbohydrate allocation and C:N:P stoichiometry in response to light acclimation in seedlings of two subtropical shade- tolerant tree species. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 124, 146-154.
[70]	Xu LN, Jin GZ (2012). Species composition and community structure of a typical mixed broadleaf-Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) forest plot in Liangshui Nature Reserve, Northeast China. Biodiversity Science, 20, 470-481. DOI
	[徐丽娜, 金光泽 (2012). 小兴安岭凉水典型阔叶红松林动态监测样地: 物种组成与群落结构. 生物多样性, 20, 470-481.] DOI
[71]	Zhang ZH, Cao BL, Chen ZJ, Xu K (2021). Grafting enhances the photosynthesis and nitrogen absorption of tomato plants under low-nitrogen stress. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 41, 1714-1725.
[72]	Zheng J, Jiang Y, Qian H, Mao YJ, Zhang C, Tang XX, Jin Y, Yi Y (2022). Size-dependent and environment-mediated shifts in leaf traits of a deciduous tree species in a subtropical forest. Ecology and Evolution, 12, e8516. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8516. PMID
[73]	Zhu JJ, Lu DL, Zhang WD (2014). Effects of gaps on regeneration of woody plants: a meta-analysis. Journal of Forestry Research, 25, 501-510.
[74]	Zvereva EL, Paolucci LN, Kozlov MV (2020). Top-down factors contribute to differences in insect herbivory between saplings and mature trees in boreal and tropical forests. Oecologia, 193, 167-176. DOI PMID

小兴安岭三种槭树叶性状随植株大小和林冠条件的变异

Leaf trait variations and relationships of three Acer species in different tree sizes and canopy conditions in Xiao Hinggan Mountains of Northeast China

全文

PDF (PC)

附录附件

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 74

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	苏炜, 陈平, 吴婷, 刘岳, 宋雨婷, 刘旭军, 刘菊秀. 氮添加与干季延长对降香黄檀幼苗非结构性碳水化合物、养分与生物量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(8): 1094-1104.
[2]	余海霞, 曲鲁平, 汤行昊, 刘南, 张子雷, 王浩, 王艺璇, 邵长亮, 董刚, 胡亚林. 闽楠和木荷非结构性碳水化合物对不同模式热浪的差异性响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(2): 249-261.
[3]	赵镇贤, 陈银萍, 王立龙, 王彤彤, 李玉强. 河西走廊荒漠区不同功能类群植物叶片建成成本的比较[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(11): 1551-1560.
[4]	陈图强, 徐贵青, 刘深思, 李彦. 干旱胁迫下梭梭水力性状调整与非结构性碳水化合物动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(10): 1407-1421.
[5]	张增可, 李曾燕, 杨柏钰, 赛碧乐, 杨安娜, 张立, 牟凌, 郑俊勇, 金乐薇, 赵钊, 王万胜, 杜运才, 阎恩荣. 上海大金山岛常见木本植物功能性状对生长和死亡的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(10): 1398-1406.
[6]	李变变, 张凤华, 赵亚光, 孙秉楠. 不同刈割程度对油莎豆非结构性碳水化合物代谢及生物量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(1): 101-113.
[7]	伍敏, 田雨, 樊大勇, 张祥雪. 干旱胁迫下毛白杨和元宝槭的水力学调控[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 1086-1097.
[8]	董涵君, 王兴昌, 苑丹阳, 柳荻, 刘玉龙, 桑英, 王晓春. 温带不同材性树种树干非结构性碳水化合物的径向分配差异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(6): 722-734.
[9]	李思源, 张照鑫, 饶良懿. 桑苗非结构性碳水化合物和生长激素对水淹胁迫的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(3): 311-320.
[10]	秦慧君, 焦亮, 周怡, 薛儒鸿, 柒常亮, 杜达石. 祁连山优势树木碳水化合物资源分配的海拔和树种效应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(2): 208-219.
[11]	代远萌, 李满乐, 徐铭泽, 田赟, 赵洪贤, 高圣杰, 郝少荣, 刘鹏, 贾昕, 查天山. 毛乌素沙地沙丘不同固定阶段黑沙蒿叶性状特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(11): 1376-1387.
[12]	祁鲁玉, 陈浩楠, 库丽洪·赛热别力, 籍天宇, 孟高德, 秦慧颖, 王宁, 宋逸欣, 刘春雨, 杜宁, 郭卫华. 基于植物功能性状的暖温带5种灌木幼苗生长策略[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(11): 1388-1399.
[13]	林夏珍, 刘林, 董婷婷, 方琦博, 郭庆学. 非结构性碳水化合物与氮分配对美洲黑杨和青杨耐盐能力的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(9): 961-971.
[14]	吴秋霞, 吴福忠, 胡仪, 康自佳, 张耀艺, 杨静, 岳楷, 倪祥银, 杨玉盛. 亚热带同质园11个树种新老叶非结构性碳水化合物含量比较[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(7): 771-779.
[15]	谭一波, 田红灯, 曾春阳, 沈浩, 申文辉, 叶建平, 甘国娟. 猫儿山铁杉相邻植株冠层机械磨损对枝叶性状的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(12): 1281-1291.