• •    

中国夏季植被对复合干旱高温事件的短期响应及其与事件强度的关系

何雪筠, 姜超, 冀永泽, 葛士龙   

  1. 北京林业大学生态与自然保护学院, 北京 100083 中国
    新疆新土地城乡规划设计院, 830028
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-25 修回日期:2026-03-27
  • 基金资助:
    教育部博士点基金新教师项目(××××)。(楷体_GB2312,五号)。Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (××××), and the......(××××); 教育部博士点基金新教师项目(××××)。(楷体_GB2312,五号)。Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(××××), and the......(××××)

Short-term Response of Summer Vegetation to Compound Drought and Heatwave Events in China and Its Relationship with Event Intensity

HE Xue-Yun, JIANG Chao, JI Yong-Ze, GE Shi-Long   

  1. School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University 100083, China
    , Xinjiang New Land Urban and Rural Planning & Design Institute 830028,
  • Received:2025-12-25 Revised:2026-03-27
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(42175170)

摘要: 中国是复合干旱高温事件的热点地区,此类事件对植被产生的负面影响备受关注。单次事件对植被的影响常受到植被前期生长状态或前期极端事件的叠加干扰。然而目前鲜有针对植被前期的状态进行剥离分析的相关研究。针对此,本研究利用2001-2023年夏季8天尺度的归一化植被指数(NDVI)与气象数据,通过筛选事件发生前8天植被状态良好且无干旱或高温事件干扰的样本,分析并比较短期复合干旱高温、单一干旱和单一高温事件对植被的影响过程。揭示了复合事件与单一事件对植被影响的差异。结果表明:(1)三类事件均导致植被状态变化量出现由正转负,超过80%的地区总植被状态变化为负值。从全国平均来看,复合事件(-0.27)与单一干旱事件(-0.26)造成的总变化接近,但二者的影响在空间上存在明显的异质性。(2)在全国约30%的地区(主要为华北、西北等干旱/半干旱区),复合干旱高温事件的负面影响大于任何单一事件;然而,在约25%的区域(比如内蒙古北部部分地区),复合事件的影响小于单一事件。(3)复合事件的负面影响受事件的强度调节。在所有降水强度下,复合事件对植被的总负面影响显著大于单一干旱事件,且随着干旱加剧,这种差异进一步扩大。在不同高温强度下,二者关系更为复杂:在中低强度高温胁迫下,复合事件的影响大于单一高温事件;但在高强度高温胁迫下,其负面影响反而显著小于单一高温事件。本研究揭示了短期复合干旱高温事件与短期单一事件对中国植被的影响特征及其随事件强度的变化规律为理解气候变化下生态系统的脆弱性及制定防治复合事件的有效措施提供了科学参考。

关键词: 短期复合干旱高温事件, NDVI, 影响, 事件强度, 植被前期状态

Abstract: Aims China is a hotpot for compound drought and hot events, which pose significant threats to ecosystem stability. Although the impact of climate extremes on vegetation is modulated by pre-existing growth conditions, few studies have explicitly accounted for the vegetation preconditioning when assessing impacts. This study aims to disentangle the short-term impacts of compound drought-hot events from those of individual extremes on summer vegetation in China, specifically by isolating events that occurred under favorable pre-event growth conditions. Methods Using summer 8-day NDVI and meteorological data from 2001 to 2023, we analyzed the short-term impact of compound drought–hot events on vegetation in comparison with individual drought or hot events. Crucially, we isolated the specific impact of these events themselves, we restricted our analysis to samples exhibiting favorable vegetation status and no preceding extremes prior to the event onset. Important findings (1) All three event types triggered significant vegetation decline, with over 80% of areas exhibiting negative NDVI standardized anomalies. Although the national average impact of compound events (-0.27) approximated that of individual droughts (-0.26), significant spatial heterogeneity was observed. (2) In approximately 30% of regions (mainly arid/semi-arid areas like North and Northwest China), compound events caused greater damage than any individual event (synergistic effect). Conversely, in ~25% of areas (e.g., parts of northern Inner Mongolia), the impact of compound events was weaker than that of individual extremes (antagonistic effect). (3) The impact of compound events was strongly dependent on event intensity. Across all precipitation deficits, compound events consistently caused greater vegetation loss than individual droughts, with the disparity amplifying as drought severity increased. However, the relationship with temperature was nonlinear: under low-to-moderate heat stress, compound events were more damaging than individual hot events, whereas under high-intensity heat stress, compound events caused significantly less damage than individual heatwaves. These findings highlight the critical role of event intensity and vegetation preconditioning in determining ecosystem vulnerability to compound climate extremes.

Key words: Short-term Compound Drought and Heatwave, NDVI, Impact, Event Intensity, Vegetation Preconditioning